Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1- Diagnosis
2- Indications / Contraindications
3- StepStep-byby-step pulpotomy technique
4- Mechanism of action of formocresol
5- Alternatives to formocresol
2004/03/30
Introduction
Preservation of primary teeth in the arch
Management of developing dentition
Nurturing a positive attitude in
children towards dental health
Introduction
Use of pulp therapy to conserve carious
primary teeth
Preserve pulp involved primary molar
when missing permanent successor
Prevent possible aberrant habits
Maintain masticatory function
Preserve aesthetics
Future dental attitudes
A1A1- Diagnosis
1/5 dilution of
the original Buckley
Buckleys formocresol
NISHIKA
Root canal disinfectant
Cresol
40mL
Formalin 40mL
Ethanol 20mL
A1A1- Diagnosis
A1A1- Diagnosis
The reason for this is that
caries in primary teeth
compromises pulp very early on,
with pulp inflammation setting in
even before pulp is exposed
A1A1- Diagnosis
Hobson (1970)
In over 50% of the primary molars
Loss of marginal ridge
irreversible pulp inflammation
A1A1- Diagnosis
Duggal et al (1999)
The need for pulp therapy for
most primary molars where
proximal caries has involved the
marginal ridge
The importance of early
diagnosis of proximal caries with
the use of bitewing radiographs
A1A1- Diagnosis
A1A1- Diagnosis
A1A1- Diagnosis
A1A1- Diagnosis
By the time the caries exposes the pulp, the inflammation is irreversible
irreversible
Direct pulp capping is contraindicated
A2A2- Indications
Large caries with substantial loss (
(1/3 )
of marginal ridge in restorable tooth
Tooth free of radicular pulpitis
At least 2/3 of root remaining
Absence of abscess or fistula
No interinter-radicular bone loss
No evidence of internal resorption
Instances where extraction is C/I
A2A2- Contraindications
An unrestorable tooth
BiBi- or trifurcation involvement
Less than 2/3 of root remaining
Presence of abscess or fistula
Permanent successor close to eruption
Medical contraindications
Heart disease
ImmunoImmuno-compromised children
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 1: Administer local analgesia with
the use of a topical analgesic
Nerve block
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 2: Isolate tooth with rubber dam
Buccal infiltration
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 3: Remove caries &
determine site of pulp exposure
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 5: Remove coronal pulp with
large excavator or large round bur
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 4: Remove roof of pulp chamber
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 6: Apply FC on a pledget of
cotton wool for 4 minutes
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 7: Remove FC pledget after 4 mins
& check that haemorrhage has stopped
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 8: Fill pulp chamber with cement
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 9: Restore tooth with SSC
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
Step 10: Take a postpost-OP radiograph
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
A3A3- StepStep-byby-step
FollowFollow-up
Regularly reviewed both clinically &
radiographically 66-monthly
Appearance of rarefaction of bone
in furcation area or
a worsening of bone condition
in furcation
usually signifies failure of the procedure
PrePre-OP
PostPost-OP
3M
12 M
FC acts through
aldehyde group of formaldehyde,
formaldehyde,
forming bonds with sideside-groups
of amino acids of both bacterial
proteins & remaining pulp tissue
Both bactericidal & devitalizing
agent
A5A5- Alternatives to FC
Concern about possible toxicity of
FC, both locally & systemically
Alternatives
Ferric sulphate [Fe2(SO4)3]
Glutaraldehyde
Calcium hydroxide
Other experimental methods
A5A5- Alternatives to FC
Glutaraldehyde
Introduced by sGravenmade (1975)
Better fixative agent
Toxic properties
Reported
success rate
of FC
pulpotomy
A5A5- Alternatives to FC
Ferric sulphate [Fe2(SO4)3, 15.5%]
Excellent haemostatic agent
(ferric ionion-protein complex)
As effective as FC
No fixative
fixative effect
A5A5- Alternatives to FC
Calcium hydroxide
Poor (around 60%) success rate
Extensive internal resorption
below amputation
Allergic reactions
Eye irritation
A5A5- Alternatives to FC
Other experimental methods
Electrosurgery
CO2 lasers
Enriched collagen solution
B2B2- Indications
Irreversible inflammation
extending to radicular pulp
Primary teeth with necrotic pulps
Evidence of furcation pathology
Presence of an abscess
B2B2- Contraindications
Unrestorable crown
Advanced pathological root
resorption
Medical contraindications
Heart disease
ImmunoImmuno-compromised
children
- Vitapex, Endoflas
- Machida (1983): Ca(OH)2-iodoform mixture to
be a nearly ideal primary tooth filling material
1) easy to apply
2) resorbs at a slightly faster rate
than that of the roots
3) has no toxic effects on the
permanent successor
4) radiopaque
3 M later
One-stage / single-visit
pulpectomy
Two-stage / two-visit
pulpedctomy
Within 11-2 mm
File lightly
Reaming is not advisable
File to no more than size 30
FollowFollow-up
Regularly reviewed both clinically &
radiographically 66-monthly
PrePre-OP
PostPost-OP
6 M later
PrePre-OP
3 M later
PostPost-OP
12 M later
10
92/08/21
(F/U 9M)
PrePre-OP
PrePre-OP
91/11/12
(Root canal filling)
6 M later
92/12/29
(F/U 13M)
PostPost-OP
Indications
Presence of an acute abscess
with or without associated
cellulitis
Presence of active & persistent
discharge from the root canals
11
12