Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iznalaenje odnosa momenta savijanja zakrivljenosti armiranobetonskih stupova upljeg presjeka na mostovima
Pregledni lanak
Predmet rada je tono odreivanje odnosa momenta savijanja i zakrivljenosti upljih pravokutnih stupova mostova. Uz postupak prorauna tone krivulje
odnosa prikazan je i nain odreivanja idealiziranog dijagrama obino koritenog u praksi. Cilj rada je ukazati na zalihu nosivosti elementa u usporedbi
tone krivulje i idealiziranog dijagrama te analizirati utjecaj razliitih proraunskih situacija na oblik krivulje. Zakljuak je da je za praktinu uporabu
dovoljno koristiti idealizirani dijagram dok se za detaljne znanstvene analize mora odreivati toan odnos momenta savijanja i zakrivljenosti.
Kljunerijei: moment savijanja; stupovi mostova; uplji presjek; zakrivljenost
Introduction
Determination of the bending moment curvature relationship for bridge concrete columns
Previous research
I. uri et al.
Zc1
Xc
I. uri i dr.
1 =
M cr
,
Ecm I
B
180 250
250 350
H
200 220
220 250
D
30 40
40 60
(1)
Height
< 50 m
50 m
fctm + P/A
P/A
fctm + 2P/A
D
30 40
40 60
H
200 300
300 500
H - Xc
B
400 500
500 800
Xc
Height
< 50 m
50 m
fctm + P/A
fctm
909
Determination of the bending moment curvature relationship for bridge concrete columns
xc =
( f ctm + 2 P A) H ,
2 f ctm + 2 P A
I. uri et al.
(2)
(4)
M cr1 =
ct I i
H xc
(5)
910
Xc
H'
Zst2
Zsc2
Zsc1
d
ti = [ Ac H 2 + ( ep 1) Asc1 (d + rsc1 ) +
+ Asc2 ( D d rsc2 ) + Ast1 ( H d rst1 ) +
+ Ast2 ( H D + d rst2 )] Ai ,
Zst1
Zc1
Zc2
s0 =
f sd
,
Es
(6)
2 =
cc
xc
(7)
I. uri i dr.
xc =
( ccM + P ) ( H d r )
,
st1 + ccM + P
(8)
(9)
Fsc1
v =
-
3000 ( ccM + P ) 2
,
3000 ( ccM + P )
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
P =
P
.
A Ecm
(18)
Fsc2
Fcc
H' =
xc ( cc + ct )
cc
(19)
cc = f cd 2
Fst1
2
cc cc
,
c0 c0
(20)
cc = f cd 1 0,2
(10)
(11)
1000 ( ccM + P )
[6 1000 ( ccM + P )],
12
cc c0
,
cu c0
(21)
v =
(12)
Ai = B D + 2 ( X c D) D + ( ep 1) As ,
(22)
911
Determination of the bending moment curvature relationship for bridge concrete columns
ti = [( B D D 2 + 2 ( xc D) D
( D + ( xc D) 2) + ( ep 1) Asc1 (d + r ) +
+ Asc2 ( D d r ) + Ast1 ( H d r ) +
+ Ast2 ( H D + d + r )] Ai ,
I. uri et al.
(23)
D ( H ' D) 3
B D3
+
B D (ti D 2) 2 +
12
12
2
+ D ( H ' D) (( H ' D) 2 ti ) + (ep 1)
Ii =
( 2r ) 4
( 2r ) 4
nsc 2 +
nsc1 + Asc1 (ti d r ) 2 +
64
64
( 2r ) 4
nst1 +
+ Asc 2 (ti D + d + r ) 2 +
64
4
( 2r )
nst 2 +
+ Ast1 ( H ti d r ) 2 +
64
+ Ast2 ( H ti D + d + r ) 2 ],
(24)
Ai = xc B + ( ep 1) As ,
(25)
ti = [( xc B xc 2 + ( ep 1) Asc1 (d + r ) +
+ Asc2 ( D d r ) + Ast1 ( H d r ) +
+ Ast2 ( H D + d + r )] Ai ,
(26)
B xc3
B xc (ti xc 2) 2 + (ep 1)
12
( 2r ) 4
( 2r ) 4
[
nsc1 + Asc1 (ti d r ) 2 +
nsc 2 +
64
64
4
( 2r )
+ Asc 2 (ti D + d + r ) 2 +
nst1 +
64
( 2r ) 4
+ Ast1 ( H ti d r ) 2 +
nst 2 +
64
2
+ Ast2 ( H ti D + d + r ) ],
Ii =
(27)
M cr2 =
cc I i
xc
(28)
912
I. uri i dr.
35.000,0
10.000,0
45.000,0
40.000,0
35.000,0
30.000,0
25.000,0
20.000,0
15.000,0
32.096,30
5.000,0
30.000,0
My
25.000,0
25.866,63
Mu
0,0020
0,0040
0,0060
0,0080
0,0100
15.000,0
10.000,0
0,0
0,0000
23.888,29
20.000,0
Idealized
curve M/
Realistic
curve M/
50000,0
40000,0
9.093,75
Mcr
0,0
0,0000
b/h =
400/200 cm
b/h =
500/200 cm
b/h =
300/200 cm
5.000,0
30000,0
b/h =
400/250 cm
0,0020
0,0040
0,0060
20000,0
3.4
2,51%
reinforcement
1,03%
reinforcement
1,99%
reinforcement
3,02%
reinforcement
4,02%
reinforcement
b/h =
400/300 cm
10000,0
0,0
0,0000 0,0010 0,0020 0,0030 0,0040 0,0050 0,0060
Figure 11 Bending moment - curvature relationship diagram for
different geometrical characteristic of section
Determination of the bending moment curvature relationship for bridge concrete columns
I. uri et al.
35000,0
M
30000,0
25000,0
P = 2000 kN
20000,0
P = 15000 kN
15000,0
50000,0
40000,0
30000,0
20000,0
10000,0
Fck = 40
N/mm2
Fck = 30
N/mm2
Fck = 50
N/mm2
Fck = 60
N/mm2
Fck = 70
N/mm2
0,0
0,0000 0,0010 0,0020 0,0030 0,0040 0,0050 0,0060 0,0070
Figure 12 Bending moment - curvature relationship diagram for
different concrete characteristic strengths
914
P = 25000 kN
5000,0
0,0
0,0000
0,0010
0,0020
0,0030
0,0040
0,0050
0,0060
60000,0
P = 20000 kN
10000,0
70000,0
P = 10000 kN
Conclusion
References
I. uri i dr.
[4] Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for
buildings. Brussels, 2004.
[5] Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 2: Bridges. Brusseles, 2005.
[6] The fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Wilhelm
Ernst & Sohn, Verlag fr Architektur und technische
Wissenschaften GmbH & Co. KG. Berlin 2013.
[7] Radi, J. Mostovi. Dom i Svijet, Zagreb 2002.
[8] Radi, J. Masivni mostovi. Andris, Zagreb 2007.
[9] Radi, J. Betonske konstrukcije prirunik. Andris, Zagreb
2007.
[10] Pfrang, E. O.; Siess, C. P.; Sozen, M. A. Load-MomentCurvature Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Cross
Sections. // Journal of the American Concrete Institute, July
(1964), pp. 763-777.
[11] Creazza, G.; Di Marco, R. Bending moment-mean
curvature relationship with constant axial load in the
presence of tension stiffening. // Materials and Structures.
26, (1993), pp. 196-206. DOI: 10.1007/BF02472612
[12] Kisiek, T.; Sori, Z. Dijagram moment savijanja
zakrivljenosti za armiranobetonske grede. // Graevinar, 55,
4(2003), pp. 207-215.
[13] imi, V. Otpornost materijala 1. kolska knjiga, Zagreb
2002.
[14] AASHTO LFRD Bridge Design Specification, American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
Washington, D. C. 2012.
Authors addresses
Ivan uri, mag. ing. aedif.
Massa d.o.o.
Ul. Svetog Leopolda Bogdana Mandia,
31000 Osijek, Croatia
E-mail: ivan.curic1@gmail.com
prof. dr. sc. Jure Radi, dipl. ing. gra.
Sveuilite u Zagrebu,
Graevinski fakultet,
Fra Andrije Kaia-Mioia 26,
10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
E-mail: jradic@master.grad.hr
Marin Franetovi, dipl. ing. gra.
Sveuilite u Zagrebu,
Graevinski fakultet,
Fra Andrije Kaia-Mioia 26,
10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
E-mail: mfranetovic@grad.hr
915