Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The quantification of blood vessels provides the means for assessing the severity of
corneal neovascularization and the impact of any treatment process being followed.
In this paper we propose a Contourlet Transform based approach to the detection,
enhancement and quantification of blood vessels in corneal images. Initially a semiautomated approach is used to identify the boundary of the cornea and to segment
the corneal region of interest (ROI). This is followed by the application of
Contourlet Transforms to the difference of red and green colour planes of the ROI,
an image that produces fewer artefacts due to reflections and highlights. The blood
vessel regions are subsequently enhanced in the Countourlet domain before being
inverse transformed to obtain a corneal ROI with enhanced contrast. The enhanced
image is finally thresholded to form a binary image which undergoes thinning to
produce the final binary image. The quantification of the blood vessels is carried out
by calculating the ratio between pixels belonging to the blood vessels and
background areas. Experimental results on four practical data sets obtained from
patients suffering from different levels of corneal neovascularization are provided.
Keywords:Contourlet Transform, corneal neovascularization,segmentation of blood vessels
INTRODUCTION
UbiCC Journal
(a)
(b)
Page 31
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
(a)
(b)
Proposed Approach
2.1
An Overview
The quantification of corneal neovascularization
requires the determination of the ratio between the
total area occupied by the blood vessels and the total
area of the cornea. This requires both the
determination of the boundary of the cornea and the
segmentation of all blood vessels.
Although a number of automated corneal area
segmentation algorithms have been proposed in
literature under the present context of our research
which focuses more on the accuracy of segmentation
of blood vessels [15], we decided to use a semiautomated, accurate, corneal boundary segmentation
approach. In this approach an initial elliptically shaped
countour is adjusted manually by the user to register
UbiCC Journal
Page 32
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
2.2
Pre-processing
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
UbiCC Journal
Page 33
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Km
if x < a
x a m p 2a x
(
) +
a
a
a
m p
if 2a x < m
y a ( x, ) = ( )
x
m
y a ( x, ) = ( ) s
if x m
x
y a ( x, ) =
of the
maximum Contourlet coefficient
relative sub-band. l must be less than 1. In this
case, choosing for instance a=3 l=0.5, we
amplify all coefficients with an absolute value
between 3 and half the maximum absolute
value of the sub-band.
if a x < 2a
(1)
In the above equations, m determines the degree of
nonlinearity. s introduces dynamic range compression.
Using a nonzero s will enhance the weaker edges and
soften the stronger edges. a is a normalization
parameter. Parameter m is the value under which
coefficients are amplified. It is obviously dependent
on the values of pixels. There are two possible options
to derive the value of m,
m = K m
UbiCC Journal
Page 34
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
2 f =
f
f
+
x 2
y 2
Then,
(2)
|t |
1
2
exp(
t 2
2 2
(9)
n , which is the
2
standarddeviation of noise from the variance n
n =
0 1 0
L1 = 1 -4 1
0 1 0
)dt
1
| f ( x, y) * M |
2 6(W 2)( H 2) image f
(10)
1 0 1
1
=
L2 = 0 -4 0
2
1 0 1
(4)
1 -2 1
M = 2(L2 L1 ) = -2 4 -2
1 -2 1
(5)
(a)
2
n
= 36 n
(b)
(6)
deviation n . Assume f(x, y) * M denotes the value filter was applied on the output of the previous step
of applying the mask M at position (x, y) in the image f. (Inverse contourlet transform)
Computing the variance of the output of the M
operator applied to the image f, will give an estimate
36 2
1
36(W 2)(H 2)
(7)
image f
|t |
1
2
UbiCC Journal
exp(
t 2
)dt =
2 2
(11)
2.3 Segmentation
After the images have been enhanced following the
procedure described in 2.2 we use a simple
threholding based approach to segment the blood
vessels (Note experimental selection of threshold
that results in the best perceptual results). In doing so
we create a binary image with 0 (black) representing
pixel values outside the blood vessels and 255 (white)
representing pixel values belonging to the blood
vessels.
Figure 9 illustrates the resulting blood vessel
segmentation obtained by following the contrast
enhancement procedure described in 2.2
(8)
Page 35
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Condition G3:
(16)
Condition G3:
(17)
(a)
(b)
Thinning
We applied a standard Thinning approach [19] to
make the blood vessels more analogous to the ones on
the original image. The algorithm can be described as
follows:
In the thinning approach used the deletion or retention
of a (white) pixel p depends on a number of conditions
(G1, G2 and G2 defined below) and iterations.
After dividing the image into two distinct subfields, in
the first sub-iteration, if and only if conditions G1, G2
and G3 are all satisfied pixel p would be deleted from
the first subfield.
In the second sub-iteration, if and only if conditions
G1, G2 and G3 are all satisfied pixel p would be
deleted from the second subfield. [19]
Condition G1:
(12)
(a)
(b)
Where
(13)
Condition G2:
(14)
Where
(15)
UbiCC Journal
Image 1
Image 2
35
39
Cornea
area
196022
190582
Image 3
Image 4
Image 5
Image 6
40
35
70
135
195034
197199
186190
157139
Page 36
Vessel
area
72491
60734
Ratio
%
36.9
31.9
55448
51138
42728
13374
28.4
25.9
22.9
8.5
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Image 1
(a)
(b)
(e)
(f)
(c)
(d)
(g)
(h)
(c)
(d)
(g)
(h)
(c)
(d)
Image 2
(a)
(b)
(e)
(f)
Image 3
(a)
UbiCC Journal
(b)
Page 37
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Image 4
(a)
(b)
(e)
(f)
(c)
(d)
(g)
(h)
Image 5
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
UbiCC Journal
Page 38
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Image 6
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Figure 11: Experimental Results (a) original colour images (b) red component images (c) green component
images (d) The difference between the red and green component image, before enhancement (e) The difference
between the red and green component image after countoulet based enhancement (f) result after applying the
contrast enhancement filter (g) binary images after segmentation that was used in the quantification. (h) Result
after the Thinning algorithm is applied.
Conclusions
We have proposed an efficient computer aided
UbiCC Journal
Page 39
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
2007
2009
2010
(a)
(b)
Figure 12: Results for a patient who has undergone corneal drafting. [Note: each column indicates the year of
data capture] (a) Original Images. (b) Binary images after segmentation
Chart 1: The healing progression of the cornea of the patient who had undergone corneal grafting.
UbiCC Journal
Page 40
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
May 2010
June 2010
December 2010
(a)
(b)
Figure 13: Results for the patient who has been undergoing medical treatment. [Note: each column indicates the
month and year of data capture. Only three out of the seven samples are illustrated above] (a) Original Images
(b) binary images after segmentation
Chart 2: The healing progression of the cornea of the patient who had been undergoing medical treatment.
UbiCC Journal
Page 41
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to extend their gratitude to
Prof. H. Dua and Ms L.Faraj, Queens Medical Centre,
Nottingham University, UK for their support and
advice.
5
References
[1] F.Scarpa,E.
Grisan
and
A.Ruggeri
Automatic Recognition of Corneal Nerve
Structures in Images from Confocal
Microscopy, Investigative Ophthalmology
& Visual Science, November 2008, Vol. 49,
No. 11.
[2] F. Bock, J. Onderka, D. Hos, F. Horn, P.
Improved
Martus,
C.
Cursiefen
semiautomatic method for morphometry of
angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in
corneal flatmounts Elsevier, Experimental
Eye Research, 2008 ,87,pp.46270.
[3] C.Cursiefen, F.Bock, F.Horn, F. Kruse, et.
GS-101 Antisense Oligonucleotide Eye
Drops Inhibit Corneal Neovascularization
American Academy of Ophthalmology,
September 2009, Vol. 116, No. 9.
[4] Proia AD, Chandler DB, Haynes WL,.
Quantitation of corneal neovascularization
using computerized image analysis Lab
Invest. 1988 Apr,58(4):473-9.
[5] M.Dabbaha, J. Grahama, M.Tavakolib, et.
Nerve Fibre Extraction in Confocal Corneal
Microscopy Images for Human Diabetic
Neuropathy Detection using Gabor Filters,
JDRF scholar grant 17-2008-1031.
[6] Cursiefen C, Wenkel H, Martus P, et.
Standardized semiquantitative analysis of
corneal neovascularization using projected
corneal photographs--pilot study after
perforating corneal keratoplasty before
immune reaction. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd.
2001 Jul,218(7),484-91.
[7] I.Bahar,
I.Kaiserman,
P.McAllum,
D.Rootman,
and
A.Slomovic
Subconjunctival Bevacizumab Injection for
Neovascularization
Lippincott
Corneal
Williams & Wilkins, February 2008,Vol. 27,
No 2.
[8] B. S.Yan Lam and H. Yan, A Novel Vessel
Segmentation Algorithm for Pathological
Retina Images Based on the Divergence of
Vector Fields IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON
MEDICAL IMAGING, FEBRUARY 2008,
VOL. 27, NO. 2,
[9] Q.Li, J.You, L.Zhang.et. Automated Retinal
Vessel Segmentation Using Multiscale
Analysis and Adaptive Thresholding IEEE
2006 1-4244-0069-4/06.
UbiCC Journal
Page 42
www.ubicc.org
Special Issue on The International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS 2011)
Digital
Imaging
Research
Loughborough University, UK.
Group
(DIRG),
UbiCC Journal
Page 43
www.ubicc.org