Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Association of Teachers of German, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The German Quarterly
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Report
HORST S. DAEMMRICH
University of Pennsylvania
I. Research reports have traditionally presented evaluations of major contributions, recent findings, and directions in criticism. They are based on
the premise that the field of investigation is not only well established in
literary history but also clearly delineated in handbooks or bibliographies.
Even assessments of critical methods, whether of textual analysis, formalism, reader response, structuralism, semiotics, or deconstruction, can
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
II. Motif. Ever since its appearance in the Encyclopedie (1765) to describe
shows that motif is defined as: (1) a subject, a central idea, a recurrent
thematic element used in the development of an artistic or literary work;
(2) a distinctive figure in a design in architecture or decoration; (3) a short,
and noted that they seemed to be present directly in folk songs. Henry
James identified his central intent in The Wings of the Dove (1902) as a "very
old ... a very young- motive" and continued a chain of associations that
moves from motive to situation, idea, theme, image, and picture to subject.
Current literary criticism reflects these extensive correspondences not only
in the direct identification of motif with other concepts but also in the often
pronounced differences of its use. Scholars devoted to motif studies have
written excellent, incisive investigations, yet have failed to reach agreement
on the nature of motifs.
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
To pursue this argument further, one would have to assume that motifs
express basic forms of thinking (the Grundformen des Denkens proposed
by Dilthey), evolve into mythic forms (Albouy, Brunel, Danckert, Derche,
Fraisse), or disclose subconscious factors in personality formation (Jaff6).
Nevertheless, these studies and even those attributing the initial inception
of motifs to an author's unique recreation of experiences (Korner, Krogmann,
Sperber) tried to set the motif apart from the subject matter or material
These distinctions lack precision because they fail to consider the fact
that authors never work with raw material. Linguistic forms are precoded
in the language from which they are generated and the motif exists only in
and through the interrelations with other textual units. An observation such
as: he hoists the sail; he reefs the sail, made at the time in which sailing
represented a mode of transportation in a culture, can be used metaphorically
for the beginning and end of any journey. It can become a topos for writing
(Curtius, 1948) and may also form the basis for a motif sequence that links
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
broader thought in a series of images that are interwoven into the text
(Beller, 1970). To describe the various functions, scholars (Frenzel [1966],
LUmmert, Petsch) have classified motifs. Major groups include: anticipatory,
referential (internal and external), central, ornamental, filler, situational,
descriptive, and dynamic action-related motifs. Frenzel (1976) utilizes the
classification system. Yet her inventory of fifty-four motifs in the Western
tradition proves that in practice she does not acknowledge the structure of
motifs and is less concerned with function than appearance and recurrence.
I (1977) pointed out that she explores basic situations such as a man between
two women, figure traits (the ashamed ruler), and characters (beggar) without accounting for the often contradictory motifs associated with figures
and situations.
(Benveniste, Barthes), the motif functions like a switch that guides the
reader to a new plane. Each subsequent recurrence in its original or altered
quently balanced by (a) the linking process with figures and themes that
call forth conflicting associations such as horse-rider: joyous affirmation of
life/lack of foresight/early death; (b) connections established to objects (mir-
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
(5) Schematization. The continued use over long periods of time, in addition to the pronounced reductive characteristics of some motifs, can foster
schematized action sequences. Such basic game plans characterize, for instance, plays and narratives employing deception, disguise, or revenge. It
(6) The principle of supporting themes. Motifs sustain and clarify themes
by supplying concrete details and by establishing in concert a basic grid of
references in the form of primary and secondary associations.
(7) Textual organization. Aside from the aforementioned functions, motifs
contribute to the textual arrangement by initial foregrounding and subsequent restatement. The early introduction raises anticipation. Ensuing
recurrences heighten suspense and point toward a resolution. Motifs serve
the textual cohesion by motivating behavior and coordinating action. They
can also, as in the ruins and garden motifs, establish significant temporal
and spatial relations. All of these functions combine to create a dynamic
quality in texts.
Changing historical, cultural, and socio-economic conditions have not only
III. Theme. Everyone knows from the often painful experience of writing
compositions in school that a theme should be spelled out in a topic sentence,
must be developed, and brought to a satisfactory conclusion. The assignments typically cover a wide range of topics: Alexander the Great and the
structure of his army, Napoleon's decision to invade Russia, Hamlet's hesitation, or a memorable experience from the summer's vacation. It is hardly
surprising that scholars have resorted to a broad application of the concept
and also arrived at definitions that reflect specific aspects of the general
use. Curtius (1948) analyzes sapientia et fortitudo (armas y letras, Waffen
und Wissenschaften, weapons and letters) as "topos" but in numerous other
instances also identifies the ideational component of the topos as a theme.
Yet the questions of rank, prominence, and basic stance toward the world
raised by linking sword and pen have served as motivating forces in the
clash of personalities (Tasso and Antonio in Goethe's Tasso, 1790) and as a
motif sequence in the self-evaluation of writer-figures who look upon the
word as a finely honed weapon for criticism (Honore Balzac, Les illusions
perdues, 1837-43; Thomas Mann, "Tonio Kr6ger," 1903). The theme, supported by the motif, captures the struggle of gifted writers with society and
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
However, Cassirer points out that "the mythical world is. . . at a much
more fluid and fluctuating state than our theoretical world." And if myth
"steps in where knowledge fails," then thematic components of myth invariably function symbolically, thereby infusing these elements with multidimensional levels of signification.
The literary tradition shows a reciprocal relationship between figure conception and unique traits, specific situations, or actions. Thus a figure may
be identified consistently with a situation or the situation calls for a suitable
figure. But it is obviously its position in reference to events, decisions, actions, reactions, etc., not the static location, that shapes thematic configurations. A figure in a room is not a theme. Persons fighting for survival, coming
to terms with their confinement, trying to escape a deadly environment
(Edgar Alan Poe, "The Pit and the Pendulum," 1840), pleading for acceptance
(Franz Kakfa, "Die Verwandlung," 1916), struggling at midnight with a difficult play (Thomas Mann, "Schwere Stunde, " 1905), awakening and continuously reflecting upon the creative interrelationship between artist and the
world (Thomas Mann, Lotte in Weimar 1939) provide the necessary ideational
substance for thematic development. Frauenrath has shown that a situation
(a son's homecoming) and event (murder) can determine the textual structure
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
IV. Why study themes and motifs? Since any exhaustive account of all occurrences of a given motif or theme in the literary tradition will surpass our
competence, we will have to rely on selections of representative texts. However, once the structure and functional pattern has been identified, the study
should show true literary constants. Themes and motifs are basic components of literary works. Their arrangement, distribution, repetition, and
variation form an intricate system of relationships which is an integral part of
the textual structure. The system also provides the signals which guide the
reader's perception of organization and signification. Since themes and motifs
recur not only in texts of an author but also in other works, contemporaneous
and distant, they establish a literary tradition that transcends time and location. Writers from different nations and ages have woven the threads of available configurations into new patterns that characterize individual works but
also continue an established tradition. The study of themes and motifs reveals
often unsuspected relationships between literary works usually not grouped
together. It points to the historical position of a writer and the change in intellectual history. It shows that themes and motifs are powerful forces shaping
distributional and integrational relationships in texts. It accounts for the
factors that not only govern the correlation and integration of units but also
determine the mutual dependence of figure conceptions, motifs, and themes.
Indeed, themes and motifs enforce basic structural patterns that persistently
recur and thus assist in comprehending the implicit system of rules governing
the complex plurality of the indefinitely large number of texts.
Notes
der deutschen Literatur (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1932); Elisabeth Frenzel, Stoff-, Motiv- und
Symbolforschung (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1966); Franz Anselm Schmitt, Stoff- und Motivgeschichte
Works Cited
Albouy, Pierre, Mythes et mythologies dans la littgrature frangaise. Paris: Colin, 1969.
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Brown, Calvin S. "Theme and Variations as a Literary Form." Yearbook of Comparative and
General Literature 27 (1978): 35-43.
Brunel, Pierre. Le Mythe d'Electre. Paris: Colin, 1971.
. Le Mythe de mitamorphose. Paris: Colin, 1974.
Buuren, M. B. van. "Le concept de motif." Rapports 48 (1978): 171-76.
Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man. New Haven: Yale UP, 1956.
Christensen, Arthur E. Motifyet theme. (Finnish Folklore Communications 59). Helsinki: Acad.
scientiarum fennica, 1925.
Curtius, Ernst R. Europaische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter Bern: Francke, 1948.
Czerny,
"Contribution
a une
theorie comparee
du motif
les arts."
und Formprobleme
in derZ.Literatur
Ed. Paul
B6ckmann.
Heidelberg:
Carl dans
Winter,
1959.Stil38-50.
Daemmrich, Horst S. "Review of Frenzel, Motive." German Quarterly 50 (1977): 511-12.
Daemmrich, Horst S. and Ingrid Daemmrich. Wiederholte Spiegelungen. Bern: Francke, 1978.
. Themes and Motifs in Western Literature. New York: Ungar, 1985.
Danckert, Werner. Goethe. Der mythische Urgrund seiner Weltschau. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1951.
Derche, Roland. Quatre mythos po8tiques. Paris: Soc. d'ed. d'enseignement, 1962.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (1883); Studien zur Grundlegung der
Geisteswissenschaften (1883); Das Erlebnis und die Dichtung (1906). Gesammelte Schriften.
Leipzig: Teubner, 1927-40.
Dundes, Alan. "From Etic to Emic Units in the Structural Study of Folktales." Journal of
American Folklore 75 (1962): 95-105.
deakatemia, 1964.
Falk, Eugene H. Types of Thematic Structure. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1969.
Fraisse, Simone. Le Mythe d'Antigone. Paris: Colin, 1974.
Jaffe, Aniela. "Bilder und Symbole aus E. T. A. Hoffmanns Mirchen 'Der goldne Topf.'"
Gestaltungen des UnterbewuJ3ten. Ed. Carl G. Jung. Zirich: Rascher, 1950. 239-616.
Jason, Heda. Ethnopoetry. Bonn: Linguistica Biblica, 1977.
Jolles, Andre. Einfache Formen. Halle: Niemeyer, 1930.
Jost, Frangois. Introduction to Comparative Literature. Indianapolis: Pegasus, 1974.
Kayser, Wolfgang. Das sprachliche Kunstwerk. Bern: Francke, 1959.
Knabe, Peter Ekhard. Schliisselbegriffe des kunsttheoretischen Denkens in Frankreich von der
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Levin, Harry. "Thematics and Criticism." Grounds for Comparison. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
UP, 1972.
"Motif." Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Ed. Philip P. Wiener. New York: Scribner
. "Motiv, Zug, Thema aus der Sicht der Volkserzahlungsforschung." Elemente der
Vinaver, Eugene. "From Motiv to Ornament." Medieval Literature and Folklore Studies. Essays
in Honor of Francis Lee Utley. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 1970.
Van Tieghem, Paul. La Littirature compar&e. Paris: Colin, 1946.
Volkmann-Schluck, Karl-Heinz, "Ist der Mythos ein Symbol?" Symbolon N. E (1972): 101-11.
Weber, Jean-Paul. Domaines thimatiques. Paris: Gallimard, 1963.
Weisstein, Ulrich. Einfiihrung in die vergleichende Literaturwissenschaft. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1968.
Wellek, Ren6 and Austin Warren. Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1956.
Ziolkowski, Theodore. Varieties of Literary Thematics. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983.
This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Wed, 11 May 2016 07:23:14 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms