READING 1.1
A Revolution Awaited
by Suresh Lulla from Business Today,
January 7-21, 1995parreenl
Pd
SNe We sMel UT)
A REVOLUTION AWAITED
"AN has striven for quality
since the dawn of history.
Early societies were deper-
ent on the quality of food and the
‘environment. In response to these
needs, two basic strategies or
managing for quality emerged:
human sensing—judging quality by
‘ight, smell, or feel—and lessons
Jeamt—using past experience as a
quality guide.
Primitive nomads eventually set:
tled into the sociological stricture of
‘towns and villages. With this arrange
‘ment came the division of labour
individuals being responsible for
specific tasks within the community.
‘There evolved craftsmanship, where
the customer relied on the skill and
the reputation of experienced crafts
‘men, With the growth of early techy
nology, additional strategies were
adopted for quali: specilyingneeds
by providing a sample; contol of
ually through inspection; war-
‘antesthat products were fit for use.
Inlargetowns,thecrattsmen orga-
nised themselves into monopolistic
which were strict in their
‘enforcement of product quay. Their
strategies included: mandated speci-
{ications for raw materials, processes
followed, and finished goods, audits
‘of guild members performance; and
export controls on finished goods.
‘TheIndustrial Revolution created
the factory stem. Power was har
nessed and machines did the jobs
‘once performed by craftsmen. Small
‘raftshops became obsolete, crats-
‘men became factory workers, mas-
tersbecame factory foremen. Quality
was managed as before through the
skis of the workers, supplemented
by departmental inspection, or
supervisory audits. It also brought
additional strategies for quay: wit-
ten specifications for materials,
processes ished goods, and tess,
measurement and test laboratories;
‘and standardisation in many forms,
Late in the 16th Century, the US
adopted Taylors sytem of Scientific
Management. Cental to the Taylor
sjstem was the separation of plan-
‘ning from execution. This made pos-
siblea ris in produetiviy, but dealt
crippling bow to cratsmanship and
had a negative effect on quality. To
‘compensate, factory managers setup
central inspection departments head-
‘edby chief inspectors Sil the prior-
‘y given to quality dectined and the
leadership of the quality function
became vague.
Following World War 1, the
Japanese embarked on a course of
reachingnational goalsbytraderather
than by miltary means. Prior to the
War, the export of poor quality goods
had eamed Japan a national eputa-
ion for shoddy products. To solve
these qualy problems, the Japanese
devised unprecedented strategiesfor
creating a revolution in quality.
Upper ‘managers personally took‘charge of leading the revolution. All
levels and all functions underwent
training in managing for quality.
Quality improvement was under.
taken as a continuing, revolutionary
pace. Through qualily circles, the
workforce was enlisted in quality
improvement. As a result, the Jap-
‘nese became the world's quality
leaders. Worldwide, industry after
industry has had to strugle with the
onslaught of high-quality but
reasonablypriced products from,
Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia,
‘and now, China. On the other hand,
Indian companies are consumed
in implementing $0200 quality
assurance gstems.
‘Aswenear the 21st Century, India
needs a Quality Revolution, Already,
therearesomesignsthata movement
‘may be gathering force, but we need
to hasten the process manifold. The
Quality Revolution will be charac-
terised by astronger focusonthe cur
tomer to the point of beinga passion.
Quality wil become integral 10
strategic business plans. Quality
goals and objectives willbeset at the
corporate level and deployed
throughout the organisation.
Companies will develop and
Implement new means of identifying
‘customer needs and expectations,
‘and for translating these into high-
‘quality goods and services.
Companies will develop better
‘methods for identifying poor quality
and eliminating the associated costs
‘of poor qualily. In fact, companies
‘will more than double their profits
‘without capital investment. Cycle:
time reduction willbe an obsession.
Companies will benchmark their
qualiy performances against those
‘of their competitors and leading
‘organisations in other industries.
‘The desire tobe the bestin-class wil
be paramount.
Inthe Quality Revolution, manag-
‘ng for quality will become a way of
life in every function and at every
level. Consequently, performance
appraisal systems will focus on
ually management. Ownership of
‘rostunctional business processes
will lortly ownership of functions.
Organisations will invest heavily
in educating their most valuable
resource. Thiswillbecometheircom.
petitive edge. Selfdirectng teams of
‘employees, professionals and man
agers wil continuously improve their
‘own performance and drive cross
functional quality improvement
throughout the organisation.
Companies will use training as
strategic weapon. They will rain all
their people inthe basic concepts of
‘quality management, tied closely to
job functions and individual needs.
By 2000, many finns will have
achieved levels of efficiency and
quality unimagined now. Others wll
bescrambling forsurvval.
India’s National Quality Award
will drive quality in the Afro-Asian
region. The Prime Minister's Office
will bave a Quality Council. And the
Quality Revolution will never end.READING1.2
What Future for Quality, What
Role for Ethics?
by George Muir and Csamah Shaheen, Quality Word,
March 1999technical paper @
Does the philosophical study of moral values and the guiding principles of human conduct play a
role in the competitive global economy? George Muir, director of the Quality Centre at the
University of Paisley, and Osamah Shaheen, consultant, consider the relationship between quality
and ethics
‘study to assess how far ethics contributes to
‘maintaining 2 quality strategy in small service-
oriented organisations progressed when I.
became evident that ethics was a constituent of
When quality i applied tothe
‘management ofan organisation it contributes towards the
‘maintenance of that organisation's consclence, whether
under the guise ofa quality code or customer care.
Balancing commerc
‘and customer demands
The role of quality is not as clear as it frst seems BS
{6143:1990 part two ‘Guide to the economics of quality’
Includes the following extract:
‘Aaditioal resources are usualy allocated for quaity-related
activities if can be clearly demonstrated that by doing 0 prof-
itability will be increased. Effecive quality management can
provide significant contribution to profit, and evidence shows
that allocating resources to identify reduce and contol failure
costs gives a benefit in terms of improved quality, increased
‘profitability and enhanced competiiveness
"However it cannot be expected that unlimited resources willbe
svailble and thre should be supporting financial information,
to demonstrate that action to improve quality i justified and to
direct attention to the most urgent (ie cor effective) improve:
ments”
‘There are two main implications in these paragraphs. The Brst
“describes the allocation of resources for quality-rlaed purpos-
and justifies expenditure by affirming that evidence has
shown that such efforts usualy reslt in improved quality and
36 Quattywortd Yigal 19199
profiabity. The second paragraph discourages possible rushes
Towards overspending. I states tha the cos of improved quall-
ty has to be moderated inthe light of these reuns Endless
‘unqualified expenditure should not be the order ofthe day
(Over the past 30 to 40 years quality has come tothe fore, 25
the world economy becomes increasingly driven by income at
all costs. Qualyy’s significance has sen only 25 fast asthe
edine of accountabiliry. This has become the norm in industry
and commerce.
Ethics gets personal
‘The isue of ethics is Fondamenaly @ personal matter. Ethical
‘rnciples themselves are built ino the enlightened conscience
‘of human beings, refined through generations of experienc,
and put into context by philosophy and religion. We regard
them as fundamental and essential, But human experience
changes and develops and the question of how to apply eternal
principles to new phenomena needs working on. Wheres engi-
‘neering and commerce are founded on facts, etic is subject to
‘ucuations based on differences in upbringing, background
and morals Therefore, the reinstatement of accountability and
conformity to undertaking would be best served by implement-
ing standardised set of regulations which are noo-culare oF
non-background specific.
thas been suggested tha the quality standard is fundamental-
ly an atempt by enginers to introduce ethic into industry and
‘commerce. But this is due to the fact chat quality 2s i known
today, comes fom the engineers dive for refinement, consis
tency and perfection. As Charles Jones ssid: “The more you
lear the more you realise what you did not know and all of
sudden you get the feeling that you are traveling backwards?oneal poe Farmer on ow ub
"pape soe cont nota ane rte ono
(ualty redresses the balance berween commercial undertaking
and consumer eights. Asi the case with ethics, quality has t2
be judged not so much on its own merits but on its results
Ethics fr ethics’ sake would be pointless. In the same way, qual-
it for the sake of quality would not only be poindess but azo
cverprescriptive and burdensome to industry.
Define quality
Even the definition of quality seems to vary. For example, qual-
ity as outlined by 1SO 9000 means grin things right fist-
time, nota drive for anything beyond the nom. eis an attempt
to comply with the implied offer of product or service.
Differences in perceptions of quality rest fom the variety of
definitions and these ae the primary cause ofthe differences in
‘sandards. Consider the following defisitions ind descriptions
commonly asocated with quality;
‘the totality of features and characersics of 2 product or
service that bear on its abil to satisfy stated or implied
‘needs (DW Deming)
4+ whatever makes you faster, more efficient, and more flexible
‘is what you do le Weber J)
+ value for money
+ fitness for purpose - customer’ perspective
sherence (0 defined requirements - manufacturer's
pesspective
conformance to customer requirements
conformance to customer expectations
doing things right-frstime