DISTRICT COURT of

JUDICIAL DISTRICT of ST. ALBERT

JUDICIAL, ST. ALBERT, CANADA

JUDICIAL, DISTRICT COURT OF EDMONTON, CANADA

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Maku/Chief:Nanya-Shaabu:El
[HENRY SEAN WESLEY, SIC] CESTUI QUI TRUST SIC
and :Diani:BeyEl
IN PROPRIA PERSONA

PETITIONERS

CASE NO. 090939596P1-01-001 and

090939596P1-01-002

CANADA CORPORATION, RMCP, CORPORAL LAMB ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

ST. ALBERT CORPORATION, EDMONTON, ALBERTA )

and SAINT ALBERTA PROVENTIAL COURT )

KENYOUTH LUCIEN HENRY, KENNETH V. HENRY )

MARTIN PAUL McKIERNAN, CSIS AGENT )

)

JOHN and JANE DOE'S 1 through 500 )

Respondent(s)
See:
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act:

28 U.S.C. § 1603

Articles of Confederation : March 1, 1781                                                   

WHAT IS A NATION STATE

CANADA ACCIDENTALLY RECOGNIZES MOHAWK SOVEREIGNTY

King Alfred Plan...REX 84

The "Bar" Treaty of 1947

D E C L A R A T I O N

1. I am Maku/Chief :Nanya-Shaabu:El©TM, of At-Sik-Hata Nation of

Yamassee Moors. I am a Living Flesh and Blood Man and Deny Corporate
Existence, UCC 1-2-1 and UCC 1-2-2, Foreign Head of State with
Diplomat Immunity,Authorized Represenative, Secured Party and
Creditor and I have UCC 1 Financing Statement on file in Frankfort,
Kentucky.

2. I am applying for an ex-parte Writ of Habeas Corpus and Order to

Show Cause as presented in the annexed proposal.

3. I have personal knowledge of the following facts and am

competent to testify as to the truth of these facts if called as a
witness.

II

J U R I S D I C T I O N
 4. This court of record has no jurisdiction because this action
arises under the following Constitutional sections and laws of the
United States: UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE III, SECTION 2;
TITLE 42, UNITED STATES CODE, Sections 1983, 1985, and 1986, TITLE
28, UNITED STATES CODE, Sections 1331, 1333, and 1343; and TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE, Sections 241 and 242. The Constitutional
sections and laws of the United States appear more fully below.

III

I D E N T I F I C A T I O N O F P A R T I E S

5. I am a Yamasse in the Land of Atlan. At all times mentioned

herein I have resided in the Land of Atlan. I am not a subject, and
as such I am entitled to all rights, privileges, immunities and
protections at common law as guaranteed in the Constitution.

6. Respondent(s) in this application are free Indigenous citizens

of At-Sik-Hata Nation of Yamassee Moors in the united states of
America known as Atlan, Amexem, Turtle Island and Land of The Frogs
solely responsible for their actions and do business in the Province
of Alberta, Canada. Respondents, for purposes of identification
only, are identified as follows:

a. __Jeff Morrison_______, CROWN PROSECUTOR

b. __BIRCH_______________, Judge

7. The true names and capacities of respondents sued herein as

JOHN and JANE DOE'S 1 through 500 are unknown to petitioner at this
time and therefore, Petitioner sues those respondents by such
fictitious names.

Petitioner will amend this application to allege their true names

and capacities upon discovery. Petitioner is informed, believes and
thereupon alleges, that each of the respondents is responsible for
restraint of petitioner.
 I V

A L L E G A T I O N S

8. I allege that __JEFF MORRISON_______, the CROWN PROSECUTOR,

and _______BIRCH_________, JUDGE, have conspired and are conspiring
under color of law to restrain my liberty which is guaranteed by the
U.S. Constitution.

9. They caused my restraint of liberty without any valid

reason. They have never produced an injured party. I am apprehensive
that they will cause me to be arrested again.

10. The merits of the factual dispute were not resolved nor
adequately developed in any of the hearings. Further, the state, as
a party, lacks jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction over my
person--it does not qualify for original jurisdiction as required by
U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 2(2).

11. I am being prosecuted on information and supposed statutory

(mere code) violation. In substance, the supposed violation is not
a substantive (common law) crime, nor related thereto. In its forum,
the Provincial Court was acting ministerially and did not establish
jurisdictional facts or nexus. Courts enforcing mere statutes do not
act judicially (THOMP. V. SMITH, 154 SE 579; cf. FRC V. GE, 281 US
464; KELLER V. PE, 261 US 428). This court, acting as in THOMPSON V.
SMITH, has no discretion, but must grant the remedy of Habeas
Corpus.

12. I have denied, and continue to deny the jurisdiction of the

state/provincial nisi prius court. Respondents are estopped for
failure to prove their position. A court which acts in want of
jurisdiction can issue no judgment nor warrant of authority, and all
of its acts are void ab-initio, not just voidable; nor does such a
court have any contempt powers; whereupon habeas corpus should
issue(ILL V. SIMAN, 284 Ill. 28, ILL. V. BARRETT, 203 Ill. 9).

C A V E A T

13. This is an action at law: proceedings will be pursuant to

Rule (a), 7(c), FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Actions at law
forbid titles of nobility. Titles of nobility must remain silent in
a court at law. Should a title of nobility be allowed to speak in a
court at law, it would no longer be a court at law, but a court in
equity. A title of nobility corrupts the jury, therefore it is no
longer a court at law. A court at law means: subject to a jury.

V I

C A V E A T V I A T O R

14. Respondents must enter the court at law, to answer the

complaint. Answer to complaint must bear a proper court seal. A
proper court seal is given by indigenous hand,. Sovereign authority
gives court jurisdiction to try accused by jury. Any proper answer
to this action gives this court and jury jurisdiction to consider
the issues pursuant to proper civil and/or criminal laws. Any person
who gives a proper answer to this complaint also gives the court
jurisdiction to try him criminally if found guilty. Failure to
answer results in civil process to be pursued against property and
no Constitutional defenses exist until respondents takes issue.

V I I
 A S S E R T I O N O F L A W

The laws in this case are hereby asserted:

15. "In all cases....in which a state shall be party, the Supreme
Court shall have original jurisdiction." from U. S. CONSTITUTION,
ARTICLE III, SECTION 2(2). means: subject to a jury.

16. "...all executive and judicial officers, both of the United

States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or
affirmation, to support this Constitution...." from U. S.
CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE VI, CLAUSE 3.

17. "The right of the people to be secure....against

unreasonable.... seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or
affirmation...." from U. S. CONSTITUTION, AMENDMENT IV.

18. "No person shall....be deprived of....liberty.... without due

process of law...." from U. S. CONSTITUTION, AMENDMENT V.

19. "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights,

shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the
people." from U.S. CONSTITUTION, AMENDMENT IX.

20. "A freeman shall only be amerced for a small offense

according to the measure of that offense... And none of the
aforesaid fines shall be imposed save upon oath of upright men from
the neighbourhood." from MAGNA CARTA, ARTICLE

21. "No sheriff, constable, coroners, or other bailiffs of ours

shall hold the pleas of our crown." from MAGNA CARTA, ARTICLE

22. "Henceforth the writ which is called 'Praecipe' shall not be

served on any one for any holding so as to cause a free man to lose
his court." from MAGNA CARTA, ARTICLE 34. "No freeman shall be
taken, or imprisoned, or disseized, or outlawed, or exiled, or in
any way harmed--nor will we go upon or send upon him--save by the
lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land." from MAGNA
CARTA, ARTICLE 39.

23. "If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten,

or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any
right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the
United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
or "If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the
premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

24. "They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not
more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be
subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life." from
U.S.C., TITLE 18, Section 241.

25. “Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance,

regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any
State, Territory, or District to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States, ....shall be fined not more than
$1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; ...." from
U.S.C., TITLE 18, Section 242.

26. "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of

all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or
treaties of the United States." from U.S.C., TITLE 28, Section
1331.

"(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any

civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person:

"(1) To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or

because of the deprivation of any right or privilege of a citizen of
the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any conspiracy
mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42;

"(2) To recover damages from any person who fails to prevent or to

aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42
which he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
 "(3) To redress the deprivation, under color of any State law,
statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any right,
privilege or immunity secured by the Constitution of the United
States or by any Act of Congress providing for equal rights of
citizens or of all persons within the jurisdiction of the United
States. ...." from U.S.C., TITLE 28, Section 1343.

27. "Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance,

regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ...., subjects, or causes
to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person
within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights,
privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. ...." from U.S.C.,
TITLE 42, Section 1983.

28. "... (3) If two or more persons in any State or Territory

conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of
another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or
indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection
of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the
laws; .... in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if
one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act
in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is
injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and
exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the
United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action
for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or
deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators." from
U.S.C., TITLE 42, Section 1985.

29. "Every person who, having knowledge that any of the

wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this
title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid
in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to
do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party
injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by
such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could
have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on
the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect
or refusal may be joined as respondents in the action;...." from
U.S.C., TITLE 42, Section 1986.
 30. 18 USC 241 and 42 USC 1983 "must be construed in pari
materia." from PICKING V. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO. (CCA 3) 151 F(2d) 240,
rev'g 3 FedRDec 4

31. "The individual owes nothing to the state, for he receives

nothing therefrom... his rights are such as existed by the Law of
the Land long antecedent to the organization of the antecedent to
the organization of the accordance with the Constitution. Among his
rights are...the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or
seizure except under a warrant of the law." from HALE V. HENKLE, 201
U.S. 43.

32. "...an...officer who acts in violation of the Constitution

ceases to represent the government." from BROOKFIELD CO. V. STUART,
(1964) 234 F. Supp 94, 99 (U.S.D.C., Wash., D.C.)

33. "...an officer may be held liable in damages to any person

injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties connected
with his office...The liability for nonfeasance, misfeasance, and
for malfeasance in office is in his ‘individual,' not his official
capacity..." from 70 AmJur2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil Liability.

34. "Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that

government officials be subjected to the same rules of conduct that
are commands to the citizen. In a Government of laws, existence of
the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law
scrupulously. Crime is contagious. If government becomes a
lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for the law..." from OLMSTEAD V.
U.S., 277 US 348, 485; 48 S Ct. 564, 575; 72 LEd 944.

35. A writ of habeas corpus is a proper remedy if petitioner has

reasonable apprehension of restraint of liberty by force. To justify
issuance of the writ of habeas corpus, constraint need not consist
of actual physical force. Conduct inducing a reasonable apprehension
of force may be sufficient to restrain one of his/her liberty (From
In re Rider (1920)50 CalApp 797, 802, 195 P 965).

36. Constructive Custody. The availability of the writ of habeas

corpus does not depend on the actual detention of petitioner in
prison. It is also available where petitioner is constructively in
custody and subject to restraint (From In re Petersen (1958) 51
Cal2d 177, 181, 331 P2d 24).

V I I I

S U M M A R Y

37. The merits of the factual dispute were not resolved in any
state court hearing (28 USC 2254(d)(1)).

38. The fact-finding procedure employed by the state court was not
adequate to afford a full and fair hearing (28 USC 2254(d)(2)).

39. The state court lacked jurisdiction over me in the state

court hearing (i.e. no injured party was produced, and I was never
properly within the court's jurisdiction) (28 USC 2254(d)(4)).

40. I did not receive a full, fair, and adequate hearing in

any state court proceeding (28 USC 2254(d)(6)).

41. I was denied due process of law in the state court proceeding
(28 USC 2254(d)(7)).

I X

P R A Y E R

42. WHEREFORE, I pray judgment that a writ of habeas corpus

issue and that I be released from any attendant restraint of
liberty.

43. I verify that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief, and that this verification was executed
in San Francisco, California, on March 8, 1987.
By: :Diani-Naja:Bey-El_____
:Diani:Bey-El, Martiarch of At-Sik-Hata Nation of
Yamassee Moors, Creditor, Secured Party, Authorized
Representative, Bailor/Bailee

Title 4 U.S.C. § 1-4 Title 28 U.S.C. §1333, §1337

Title 50 U.S.C. Appendix Sections: 7(c), 7 (e), 9 and 12

Fed.Rules of Civ. Procedure Rules: 8, 13 & 24 1917 Trading with the Enemy Act

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT , NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.

I, :Diani-Naja:Bey-El, am a Flesh and Blood Woman , Matriarch of The At-Sik Hata Nation of
Yamssee Moors. The following United Nations Articles and Charter were violated due to the
kidnapping of my husband :Nanya-Shaabu:El who is a Foreign Head of State is being detained and/or
false imprisonment without due process because this case was called for HENRY, SEAN (:Nanya-
Shaabu:El was never called in court).Fraud Voids A Contract Ab Inito. As a Native American, Flesh
and Blood Man, Chief of At-Sik-Hata Nation, Secured Party, and Creditor. The Provincial Court of St.
Albert, Canada never had jurisdiction or subject matter jurisdiction. The Article of Confederation
joined the UNITED STATES and CANADA in Article 11. The United States and Canada, The
Provincial Court, Edmonton District Court, CSIS, and RMCP violated the following UN Articles
and Covenants:

1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 6, states: “Everyone has the right to
recognition everywhere as a person before the law.”

2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 13 Section (1) states: “Everyone has the right
to freedom of movement and resident within the borders of each state.
3. Universal Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 12 Section (1) states: “Everyone
lawfully within the territory of a State, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to
choose his residence.”

4. Charter of the United Nations, Article 55 states: “Governmental Representatives are bound to
“promote universal respect for, and observance of, human rights and fundamental freedoms
for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion.”

5. Charter of the United Nations, Article 56 states: “All member-states pledge themselves to take
joint and separate action in cooperation with the Organization for the achievement of the
purpose set forth in Article 55.”

6. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 9 states that: “No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.”

7. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 10 states that: “Everyone is entitled in full
equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the
determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.”

8. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11 states that: “Everyone charged with a penal
offense has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty until according to law in a
public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defense.”

9. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 2, Section 1 states that: “Each
State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals
within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant,
without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other
opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.”

10. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 2, Section 3 states that: “Each
State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:

a. To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are
violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has
been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
 b. To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his rights thereto
determined by competent judicial, administrative or legislative authorities, or
by other competent authority provided for by the legal system of the State, and
to develop authorities possibilities of judicial remedy;

c. To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such remedies when
granted.”

11. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 9 Section (1) states that:
“Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds
and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.”

12. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 9 Section (1) states that: “Anyone
who is arrested shall be informed, at the time of arrest, of the reason for his arrest and shall be
promptly informed of any charges against him.”

13. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 9 Section (2) states that: “Anyone
who has been a victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to
compensation.

United States and Canada are Obligation to Respect the Right to Own Property: The arbitrary

1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17, Section 1 and 2 state: “Everyone has the
right to own property alone as well as in association with others” and “No one shall be
arbitrarily deprived of his property.”

2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 12 state: “No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home, or correspondence, nor attacks upon his
honor and reputation. Everyone has the right to protection of the law against such interference
or attacks.”

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 17, Section 1 and 2 state: “No one
shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home, or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honor and reputation” and Everyone has the
right to the protection of the law against such interference or attack.”
UNITED STATES Charter of Rights and Freedom

Part 1, Article 7, 9, and 10 recognize the fundamental right of justice for all people, to be free
from arbitrary detention and to have the basic legal right to due process. Article 12 establishes
the right to be free from cruel or unusual punishment, verifying that any person detained or
imprisoned in United States has the basic human right to medical attention and necessary life-
sustaining care.

1. Life, Liberty and Security of Person, Article 7

“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be
deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”

2. Detention or Imprisonment, Article 9

“Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned.”

3. Arrest or Detention, Article 10

“Everyone has the right on arrest or detention to be informed of the reasons therefore;

and to be released if the detention is not lawful.”

4. To retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of that right;

and to have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus

5. Treatment or Punishment, Article 12

“Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or
punishment.”

AFFIDAVIT STATEMENT OF FACTS

Fact 1. :Nanya-Shaabu:El is Plenipotentiary of Atlan, Amexem, Turtle Island, Land of the Frogs, Egypt of the
West; and RECOGNIZED by the GOVERNMENT of CANADA and have received letters from the Government of
Canada as Maku/Chief of the At-sik-hata Nation of Yamassee Moors. Our Nation is RECOGNIZED BY THE
UNITED NATIONS as an Indigenous Peoples Organization - UNIPO# 2718; Our Nations has Treaties
AUTHENTICATED by the Province of Alberta = recognition of our Self-Autonomy and Self-Government. see
http://naturalcredit.tripod.com

Fact 2. :Nanya-Shaabu:El is RECOGNIZED by CANADA INDIAN and NORTHERN AFFAIRS as

Indigenous/Aboriginal/Autochthon; and the CREDITOR IN FACT of Canada, The UNITED STATES , THE U.S.
POSTOFFICE - which was created BEFORE the U.S. Government, and Mexico. - THIS HAS NOT BEEN
REFUTED, COUNTERCLAIMED OR REBUTTED BY ANY OF THE AFOREMENTION CORPORATE ENTITIES =
TACIT CONSENT AND AGREEMENT IN COMMERCE TO THE FACTS PRESENTED UCC 2-201(2).
Fact 3. :Nanya-Shaabu:El who is a Foreign Head of State is being detained and/or false imprisonment
in which the charges has been changed several times without due process because this case was called
for HENRY, SEAN (:Nanya-Shaabu:El was never called in court).Fraud Voids A Contract Ab Inito.
:Nanya-Shaabu:El signed the order to appear but :Nanya-Shaabu-El’s name was not on the docket.

Fact 4. Should Maku:Nanya-Shaabu-El go to trial he must have a jury of his peers.

Fact 5. Canada is Bankrupt = Defacto Government. Canada/United States does not exist and ALL
subsidiaries of the state are defacto. http://sites.google.com/site/authenticexport/2 .
'WE'RE OUT OF MONEY' Sat May 23 2009 10:32:18 ET

In a sobering holiday interview with C-SPAN, President Obama boldly told

Americans: "We are out of money."

C-SPAN host Steve Scully broke from a meek Washington press corps with probing
questions for the new president.

SCULLY: You know the numbers, $1.7 trillion debt, a national deficit of $11
trillion. At what point do we run out of money?

OBAMA: Well, we are out of money now. We are operating in deep deficits, not
caused by any decisions we've made on health care so far. This is a consequence of
the crisis that we've seen and in fact our failure to make some good decisions on
health care over the last several decades.

Fact 4. CANADA/UNITED STATES have no courts. The United States/Canada was thrown into the
Atlantic Ocean and don’t know which way to start swimming and don’t know if they can swim to
shore.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NMu1mFao3w- Rep. Kanjorski: $550 Billion

Disappeared in "Electronic Run On the Banks"

Fact 6. Canada is a corporation.

Fact 7. Canada was NEVER confederated see: www.detaxcanada.org .

Fact 8. Canada (organically) is part of the United States see: 1778 Articles of Confederation and
Perpetual Union - Art. XI.

Fact 9. The SPP - North American Union, I have accepted the contract, Filed on a UCC-1 in the
Commonwealth of Kentucky and exported the SPP onto Atlan= Collateral Estoppel.

Fact 10. There are NO Common Law Courts or Canada/U.S. Corporate Courts anywhere on this land
mass see: http://sites.google.com/site/authenticexport . There are NO LONGER ANY U.S. COURTS, there
is NO Canada/U.S. or America there is ONLY ATLAN, Amexem , Turtle Island, Land of the Frogs.

Fact 11. The U.S. Post Office has been exported onto Atlan, Amexem, Turtle Island, Land of the Frogs.

Fact 12. As Stated by Pennsylvania Rep. Senator Kanjorski on CSPAN - The U.S. Corporation is in the
MIDDLE OF THE ATLANTIC. see: http://sites.google.com/site/atsikhata-1
Fact 13. There is no Canada, U.S. or Mexico see http://sites.google.com/site/authenticexport/2 - THEY
NO LONGER EXIST = NO COURTS = NO CORPORATE OPERATIONAL CHARTER = NO JURISDICTION =
NO AUTHORITY = NO Venue = THE COURTS YOU ARE TENDERING PAPERWORK TO ARE operating in
admiralty on the LAND, which they cannot do as it has already been established they are in the Middle of
the Atlantic = ALL these so-called U.S. courts with their Puerto Rican Judges( Title 48 USC sec 874) are in
an improper LOCATION and improper venue, either they shut the court down entirely or they take the
building to the middle of the Atlantic coordinates are 00 00 North Latitude; 25 00 West Longitude.

Fact 14. Proclamation by President George Bush: This is Prima Facie Evidence. We
will protect and honor tribal sovereignty and help to stimulate economic development in
reservation communities.

Fact 15. Executive Order 13107 by President Bill Clinton: This is Prima Facie
Evidence.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13107

IMPLEMENTATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and

the laws of the United States of America, and bearing in mind the
obligations of the United States pursuant to the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Convention Against Torture
and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), the
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination
(CERD), and other relevant treaties concerned with the protection and
promotion of human rights to which the United States is now or may
become a party in the future, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Implementation of Human Rights Obligations. (a) It shall

be the policy and practice of the Government of the United States, being
committed to the protection and promotion of human rights and
fundamental freedoms, fully to respect and implement its obligations
under the international human rights treaties to which it is a party,
including the ICCPR, the CAT, and the CERD.

http://www.hrweb.org/legal/genocide.html

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of

Genocide
Adopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December
1948.

Article 1
The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in
time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to
punish.

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;

(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;

(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;

(d) Attempt to commit genocide;

(e) Complicity in genocide.

Article 4

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be
punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private
individuals.

Article 5

The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective

Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present
Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of
genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3.

Article 6
Persons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be
tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was
committed, or by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect
to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction.

Article 7

Genocide and the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall not be considered as political
crimes for the purpose of extradition.

The Contracting Parties pledge themselves in such cases to grant extradition in

accordance with their laws and treaties in force.

Article 8

Any Contracting Party may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take
such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the
prevention and suppression of acts of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in
Article 3.

Article 9

Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or

fulfillment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a
State for genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3, shall be submitted to
the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.

Article 10

The present Convention, of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish
texts are equally authentic, shall bear the date of 9 December 1948.

Article 11

The present Convention shall be open until 31 December 1949 for signature on behalf of
any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State to which an invitation
to sign has been addressed by the General Assembly.

The present Convention shall be ratified, and the instruments of ratification shall be
deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

After 1 January 1950, the present Convention may be acceded to on behalf of any
Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State which has received an
invitation as aforesaid.

Instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United

Nations.

Article 12
Any Contracting Party may at any time, by notification addressed to the Secretary-
General of the United Nations, extend the application of the present Convention to all or
any of the territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations that Contracting Party is
responsible.

Article 13

On the day when the first twenty instruments of ratification or accession have been
deposited, the Secretary-General shall draw up a process-verbal and transmit a copy of it
to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States
contemplated in Article 11.

The present Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day following the date of
deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification or accession.

Any ratification or accession effected subsequent to the latter date shall become
effective on the ninetieth day following the deposit of the instrument of ratification or
accession.

Article 14

The present Convention shall remain in effect for a period of ten years as from the date
of its coming into force.

It shall thereafter remain in force for successive periods of five years for such
Contracting Parties as have not denounced it at least six months before the expiration of
the current period.

Denunciation shall be effected by a written notification addressed to the Secretary-

General of the United Nations.

Article 15

If, as a result of denunciations, the number of Parties to the present Convention should
become less than sixteen, the Convention shall cease to be in force as from the date on
which the last of these denunciations shall become effective.

Article 16

A request for the revision of the present Convention may be made at any time by any
Contracting Party by means of a notification in writing addressed to the Secretary-
General.

The General Assembly shall decide upon the steps, if any, to be taken in respect of such
request.

Article 17
The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall notify all Members of the United
Nations and the non-member States contemplated in Article 11 of the following:

(a) Signatures, ratifications and accessions received in accordance with Article 11;

(b) Notifications received in accordance with Article 12;

(c) The date upon which the present Convention comes into force in accordance with
Article 13;

(d) Denunciations received in accordance with Article 14;

(e) The abrogation of the Convention in accordance with Article 15;

(f) Notifications received in accordance with Article 16.

Article 18

The original of the present Convention shall be deposited in the archives of the United
Nations.

A certified copy of the Convention shall be transmitted to all Members of the United
Nations and to the non-member States contemplated in Article 11.

Article 19

The present Convention shall be registered by the Secretary-General of the United

Nations on the date of its coming into force.

REQUEST FOR DISCLOSURE

 1. I REQUEST a certified copy of the charges instantar.

2. I REQUEST a certified assessment of the debt owed instantar.

3. I REQUEST a certified copy of the warrant with :Nanya-Shaabu:El’s name on it

and the names of the individuals that signed the warrant instantar.

4. I REQUEST the BID Bond, Performance Bond and Payment Bonds returned to
me instantar.

5. I REQUEST the name of the insurance company(s) that is underwriting this case
instantar.

6. I REQUEST the name of the insurance companys for: Canada; St. Albert,

Canada; RMCP Lamb badge # 55359, Constable S.A. Wagner, Constable Chu; Chief

Executive Officer of Canada; Chief Financial of Canada; Chief Financial

Officer of St. Albert; Chief Executive Officer of St. Albert; Board of Trustees

of St. Albert, Canada; Board of Trustees of Edmonton District Court; Board of Trustees of

Canada; Risk Management of Canada; The Prime Minister of Canada; RMCP; Risk

Management of Edmonton, Canada; Risk Management of St. Albert, Canada; Mayor’s

Office of St. Albert, Canada; St. Albert’s Clerk of Court/Manager Sharon Boisvert; Risk

Management of St. Albert Provincial Court, Canada; Crown Prosecutor Jeff Morrison;

Canada Secret Intelligent Service ; Risk Management of ; Canada Secret

Intelligent Service Agent Martin Paul Mckiernan; Canada and Judge Birch and ALL
JOHN and JANE DOE’S from 1-500.

7. I request the Dunn and Brad Street Registration numbers for: Canada; St.

Albert, Canada; Edmonton, Canada; District Court in Edmonton, Canada; RMCP Lamb
Badge #55359, Constable S.A. Wagner, Constable Chu; Chief Executive Officer of Canada;

Chief Financial Officer of Edmonton, Canada; Chief Financial Officer of St. Albert, Canada;

Chief Financial Officer of Edmonton, Canada; Chief Executive Officer of St. Albert; Board of

Trustees of St. Albert, Canada; Board of Trustees of Edmonton, Canada; Board of Trustees of

Canada; Chief Executive Officer of Alberta, Canada; Risk Management of Edmonton, Canada,

Risk Management of Alberta, Canada; Risk Management of Canada; Risk Management of

Edmonton, Canada; The Prime Minister of Canada; RMCP; Mayor’s Office of St. Albert,

Canada; Mayor’s Office of Edmonton, Canada; St. Albert’s Clerk of Court/Manager Sharon

Boisvert; St. Albert’s Provincial Court, St. Albert, Canada; of Canada Secret Intelligent
Service:

Risk Management of Canada Secret Intelligent Service; Martin Paul Mckiernan ; Crown
Prosecutor Jeff

Morrison and Judge Birch and ALL JOHN and JANE DOE’S from 1-500 instantar.

8. I request copies of ALL BAR Cards: ALL Judges and Attorneys instantar.

NOTICE

According to the :Nanya-Shaabu-El, United Nations IPO# 2718, Plenipotentiary of Atlan,

Banker, Judge, Secured Party and Creditor has a Security Agreement on file in Macon,
Georgia, states: there is a Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollar ($750,000.00) cost per day for
violation of infringement of copyright and trademark. The cost of violating the copyright and
trademark will be Nunc Pro Tunc, starting the day that the kidnapping of the Flesh and Blood
Man: Nanya-Shaabu-El.

If Canada Recognize one Indigenous Nation then Canada recognize ALL Indigenous Nation

International Commercial Notice

Lack of written response, no response, acquiescence within 30 days by not supplying documents
and full disclosure as required by law (TILA, Section 226.23) and all requests to the Principal / Bailor /
Secured Party / Lien Holder are valid, lawful and initiated involuntary bankruptcy proceedings against
all claimants / parties and take alleged claimants/parties into a foreign proceedings to be prosecuted.
All parties agree to and consent by their actions and inactions that the Principal / Bailor / Secured
Party / Lien Holder may proceed against all alleged claimant/parties, by taking alleged
claimant/parties into a foreign proceeding to be prosecuted. See United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Sea , and agree that all processes, claims, notices and public filings advertised, filed, and
utilized by the Secured Party/Lien Holder/Grantor are valid, lawful and enforceable in favor of the
Secured Party/Lien Holder/Grantor. All parties agree that the Secured Party/Lien Holder/Grantor may
initiate involuntary bankruptcy, including seizure of alleged claimants property and proceedings
against all parties and all alleged claimants/parties and take alleged claimant/parties into a foreign
proceeding to be prosecuted. All parties agree to and consent by their actions that the Secured
Party/Lien Holder/Grantor may proceed against all alleged claimant/parties, including seizure of all
alleged claimants property, by taking alleged/parties into a foreign proceeding to be prosecuted. See
Suits in Admiralty Act.

All claims in this instrument done by the secured party/principal/lien holder are
under Admiralty law and agreed and consented to by all parties.

The claims of this Instrument are Within the Admiralty: Title 28 U.S.C. §1333,
§1337.

(See: Suits in Admiralty Act, The Bill of Lading Act, The Admiralty Extension Act and the
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.)

Jurat
At-sik-Hata , Atlan, Amexem , Turtle Island [ state of Georgia]; 1787 Constitution for the
united states of America and Articles 55 & 56 of the United Nations Charter.

Affirmed By: _Diani-Naja:Bey-El_ )

U.C.C. 1-103; U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved, Without Prejudice

By: Diani-Naja:Bey-El
U.C.C. 1-308 All Rights Reserved

 People
The Foreign Sovereign
 Publications
Immunities Act: Assessing the
Immunity of Foreign States in
  Events

 Brochures
U.S. Litigation
 Services Index U.S. litigation involving foreign sovereigns
 Nixon Peabody|
Redgrave and their instrumentalities continues to
Information Law
Advisors
grow with the increasingly global economy.
Industry participants and practitioners
should be well versed with the
jurisdictional immunity and other
Search Services:
protections afforded such entities by the
Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)
and their effect on the vindication of
Search »
adverse parties’ rights. This article
highlights significant recent appellate
decisions addressing the FSIA. These
decisions will be of interest to those
practitioners representing foreign states
and to those representing parties with
adverse interest whose position in litigation
will be affected by the rights and
procedures prescribed by the Act.
By Hugh R. Koss, Brooke C. Galardi, and
Eric B. Strain
2/16/2005

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (“the FSIA” or “the

Act”)[1] defines the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States in
actions
28 U.S.C. § 1603 : US Code - Section 1603: Definitions
Search 28 U.S.C. § 1603 : US Code - Section 1603: Definitions
 Search by Keyword or Citation
Search
For purposes of this chapter -
(a) A "foreign state", except as used in section 1608 of this
title, includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an
agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in
subsection (b).
(b) An "agency or instrumentality of a foreign state" means any
entity -
(1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise,
and
(2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political
subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other
ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political
subdivision thereof, and
2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political
subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other
ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political
subdivision thereof, and
(3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United
States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (e) of this title,
nor created under the laws of any third country.
(c) The "United States" includes all territory and waters,
continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States.
(d) A "commercial activity" means either a regular course of
commercial conduct or a particular commercial transaction or act.
The commercial character of an activity shall be determined by
reference to the nature of the course of conduct or particular
transaction or act, rather than by reference to its purpose.
(e) A "commercial activity carried on in the United States by a
foreign state" means commercial activity carried on by such state
and having substantial contact with the United States

The Article of Confederation has not been repealed to this very day

Articles of Confederation : March 1, 1781 
 Annapolis Convention Madison Debates Federalist Papers U. S. Constitution

See Also Benjamin Franklin's Draft and John Dickinson's Draft

See Discussion of The Articles of Confederation in Jefferson's Autobiography

Art 1 Art 2 Art 3 Art 4 Art 5 Art 6 Art 7

Art 8 Art 9 Art 10 Art 11 Art 12 Art 13

To all to whom these Presents shall come, we the undersigned Delegates of the States affixed to our
Names send greeting.

Articles of Confederation and perpetual Union between the states of New Hampshire, Massachusetts-
bay Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia.

I.
The Stile of this Confederacy shall be

"The United States of America".

II.
Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and
right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.

III.
The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their
common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves
to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of
religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretense whatever.

IV.
The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the
different States in this Union, the free inhabitants of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds, and
fugitives from justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the
several States; and the people of each State shall free ingress and regress to and from any other State,
and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce, subject to the same duties, impositions,
and restrictions as the inhabitants thereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so
far as to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other State, of which the owner is
an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition, duties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the
property of the United States, or either of them.

If any person guilty of, or charged with, treason, felony, or other high misdemeanor in any State, shall
flee from justice, and be found in any of the United States, he shall, upon demand of the Governor or
executive power of the State from which he fled, be delivered up and removed to the State having
jurisdiction of his offense.

Full faith and credit shall be given in each of these States to the records, acts, and judicial
proceedings of the courts and magistrates of every other State.

V.
For the most convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be
annually appointed in such manner as the legislatures of each State shall direct, to meet in Congress on
the first Monday in November, in every year, with a powerreserved to each State to recall its delegates, or
any of them, at any time within the year, and to send others in their stead for the remainder of the year.

No State shall be represented in Congress by less than two, nor more than seven members; and no
person shall be capable of being a delegate for more than three years in any term of six years; nor shall
any person, being a delegate, be capable of holding any office under the United States, for which he, or
another for his benefit, receives any salary, fees or emolument of any kind.

Each State shall maintain its own delegates in a meeting of the States, and while they act as members
of the committee of the States.

In determining questions in the United States in Congress assembled, each State shall have one vote.

Freedom of speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court or
place out of Congress, and the members of Congress shall be protected in their persons from arrests or
imprisonments, during the time of their going to and from, and attendence on Congress, except for
treason, felony, or breach of the peace.

VI.
No State, without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled, shall send any embassy
to, or receive any embassy from, or enter into any conference, agreement, alliance or treaty with any King,
Prince or State; nor shall any person holding any office of profit or trust under the United States, or any of
them, accept any present, emolument, office or title of any kind whatever from any King, Prince or foreign
State; nor shall the United States in Congress assembled, or any of them, grant any title of nobility.

No two or more States shall enter into any treaty, confederation or alliance whatever between them,
without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled, specifying accurately the purposes for
which the same is to be entered into, and how long it shall continue.
 No State shall lay any imposts or duties, which may interfere with any stipulations in treaties, entered
into by the United States in Congress assembled, with any King, Prince or State, in pursuance of any
treaties already proposed by Congress, to the courts of France and Spain.

No vessel of war shall be kept up in time of peace by any State, except such number only, as shall be
deemed necessary by the United States in Congress assembled, for the defense of such State, or its
trade; nor shall any body of forces be kept up by any State in time of peace, except such number only, as
in the judgement of the United States in Congress assembled, shall be deemed requisite to garrison the
forts necessary for the defense of such State; but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and
disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide and constantly have ready for use,
in public stores, a due number of filed pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition and
camp equipage.

No State shall engage in any war without the consent of the United States in Congress assembled,
unless such State be actually invaded by enemies, or shall have received certain advice of a resolution
being formed by some nation of Indians to invade such State, and the danger is so imminent as not to
admit of a delay till the United States in Congress assembled can be consulted; nor shall any State grant
commissions to any ships or vessels of war, nor letters of marque or reprisal, except it be after a
declaration of war by the United States in Congress assembled, and then only against the Kingdom or
State and the subjects thereof, against which war has been so declared, and under such regulations as
shall be established by the United States in Congress assembled, unless such State be infested by
pirates, in which case vessels of war may be fitted out for that occasion, and kept so long as the danger
shall continue, or until the United States in Congress assembled shall determine otherwise.

VII.
When land forces are raised by any State for the common defense, all officers of or under the rank of
colonel, shall be appointed by the legislature of each State respectively, by whom such forces shall be
raised, or in such manner as such State shall direct, and all vacancies shall be filled up by the State which
first made the appointment.

VIII.
All charges of war, and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general
welfare, and allowed by the United States in Congress assembled, shall be defrayed out of a common
treasury, which shall be supplied by the several States in proportion to the value of all land within each
State, granted or surveyed for any person, as such land and the buildings and improvements thereon shall
be estimated according to such mode as the United States in Congress assembled, shall from time to time
direct and appoint.

The taxes for paying that proportion shall be laid and levied by the authority and direction of the
legislatures of the several States within the time agreed upon by the United States in Congress
assembled.
IX.
The United States in Congress assembled, shall have the sole and exclusive right and power of
determining on peace and war, except in the cases mentioned in the sixth article -- of sending and
receiving ambassadors -- entering into treaties and alliances, provided that no treaty of commerce shall be
made whereby the legislative power of the respective States shall be restrained from imposing such
imposts and duties on foreigners, as their own people are subjected to, or from prohibiting the exportation
or importation of any species of goods or commodities whatsoever -- of establishing rules for deciding in
all cases, what captures on land or water shall be legal, and in what manner prizes taken by land or naval
forces in the service of the United States shall be divided or appropriated -- of granting letters of marque
and reprisal in times of peace -- appointing courts for the trial of piracies and felonies commited on the
high seas and establishing courts for receiving and determining finally appeals in all cases of captures,
provided that no member of Congress shall be appointed a judge of any of the said courts.

The United States in Congress assembled shall also be the last resort on appeal in all disputes and
differences now subsisting or that hereafter may arise between two or more States concerning boundary,
jurisdiction or any other causes whatever; which authority shall always be exercised in the manner
following. Whenever the legislative or executive authority or lawful agent of any State in controversy with
another shall present a petition to Congress stating the matter in question and praying for a hearing, notice
thereof shall be given by order of Congress to the legislative or executive authority of the other State in
controversy, and a day assigned for the appearance of the parties by their lawful agents, who shall then be
directed to appoint by joint consent, commissioners or judges to constitute a court for hearing and
determining the matter in question: but if they cannot agree, Congress shall name three persons out of
each of the United States, and from the list of such persons each party shall alternately strike out one, the
petitioners beginning, until the number shall be reduced to thirteen; and from that number not less than
seven, nor more than nine names as Congress shall direct, shall in the presence of Congress be drawn
out by lot, and the persons whose names shall be so drawn or any five of them, shall be commissioners or
judges, to hear and finally determine the controversy, so always as a major part of the judges who shall
hear the cause shall agree in the determination: and if either party shall neglect to attend at the day
appointed, without showing reasons, which Congress shall judge sufficient, or being present shall refuse to
strike, the Congress shall proceed to nominate three persons out of each State, and the secretary of
Congress shall strike in behalf of such party absent or refusing; and the judgement and sentence of the
court to be appointed, in the manner before prescribed, shall be final and conclusive; and if any of the
parties shall refuse to submit to the authority of such court, or to appear or defend their claim or cause, the
court shall nevertheless proceed to pronounce sentence, or judgement, which shall in like manner be final
and decisive, the judgement or sentence and other proceedings being in either case transmitted to
Congress, and lodged among the acts of Congress for the security of the parties concerned: provided that
every commissioner, before he sits in judgement, shall take an oath to be administered by one of the
judges of the supreme or superior court of the State, where the cause shall be tried, 'well and truly to hear
and determine the matter in question, according to the best of his judgement, without favor, affection or
hope of reward': provided also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United
States.
 All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more
States, whose jurisdictions as they may respect such lands, and the States which passed such grants are
adjusted, the said grants or either of them being at the same time claimed to have originated antecedent
to such settlement of jurisdiction, shall on the petition of either party to the Congress of the United States,
be finally determined as near as may be in the same manner as is before presecribed for deciding
disputes respecting territorial jurisdiction between different States.

The United States in Congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of
regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority, or by that of the respective States --
fixing the standards of weights and measures throughout the United States -- regulating the trade and
managing all affairs with the Indians, not members of any of the States, provided that the legislative right
of any State within its own limits be not infringed or violated -- establishing or regulating post offices from
one State to another, throughout all the United States, and exacting such postage on the papers passing
through the same as may be requisite to defray the expenses of the said office -- appointing all officers of
the land forces, in the service of the United States, excepting regimental officers -- appointing all the
officers of the naval forces, and commissioning all officers whatever in the service of the United States --
making rules for the government and regulation of the said land and naval forces, and directing their
operations.

The United States in Congress assembled shall have authority to appoint a committee, to sit in the
recess of Congress, to be denominated 'A Committee of the States', and to consist of one delegate from
each State; and to appoint such other committees and civil officers as may be necessary for managing the
general affairs of the United States under their direction -- to appoint one of their members to preside,
provided that no person be allowed to serve in the office of president more than one year in any term of
three years; to ascertain the necessary sums of money to be raised for the service of the United States,
and to appropriate and apply the same for defraying the public expenses -- to borrow money, or emit bills
on the credit of the United States, transmitting every half-year to the respective States an account of the
sums of money so borrowed or emitted -- to build and equip a navy -- to agree upon the number of land
forces, and to make requisitions from each State for its quota, in proportion to the number of white
inhabitants in such State; which requisition shall be binding, and thereupon the legislature of each State
shall appoint the regimental officers, raise the men and cloath, arm and equip them in a solid-like manner,
at the expense of the United States; and the officers and men so cloathed, armed and equipped shall
march to the place appointed, and within the time agreed on by the United States in Congress assembled.
But if the United States in Congress assembled shall, on consideration of circumstances judge proper that
any State should not raise men, or should raise a smaller number of men than the quota thereof, such
extra number shall be raised, officered, cloathed, armed and equipped in the same manner as the quota of
each State, unless the legislature of such State shall judge that such extra number cannot be safely
spread out in the same, in which case they shall raise, officer, cloath, arm and equip as many of such extra
number as they judeg can be safely spared. And the officers and men so cloathed, armed, and equipped,
shall march to the place appointed, and within the time agreed on by the United States in Congress
assembled.

The United States in Congress assembled shall never engage in a war, nor grant letters of marque or
reprisal in time of peace, nor enter into any treaties or alliances, nor coin money, nor regulate the value
thereof, nor ascertain the sums and expenses necessary for the defense and welfare of the United States,
or any of them, nor emit bills, nor borrow money on the credit of the United States, nor appropriate money,
nor agree upon the number of vessels of war, to be built or purchased, or the number of land or sea forces
to be raised, nor appoint a commander in chief of the army or navy, unless nine States assent to the same:
nor shall a question on any other point, except for adjourning from day to day be determined, unless by
the votes of the majority of the United States in Congress assembled.

The Congress of the United States shall have power to adjourn to any time within the year, and to any
place within the United States, so that no period of adjournment be for a longer duration than the space of
six months, and shall publish the journal of their proceedings monthly, except such parts thereof relating to
treaties, alliances or military operations, as in their judgement require secrecy; and the yeas and nays of
the delegates of each State on any question shall be entered on the journal, when it is desired by any
delegates of a State, or any of them, at his or their request shall be furnished with a transcript of the said
journal, except such parts as are above excepted, to lay before the legislatures of the several States.

X.
The Committee of the States, or any nine of them, shall be authorized to execute, in the recess of
Congress, such of the powers of Congress as the United States in Congress assembled, by the consent of
the nine States, shall from time to time think expedient to vest them with; provided that no power be
delegated to the said Committee, for the exercise of which, by the Articles of Confederation, the voice of
nine States in the Congress of the United States assembled be requisite.

XI.

Canada acceding to this confederation, and adjoining in the measures

of the United States, shall be admitted into, and entitled to all the
advantages of this Union; but no other colony shall be admitted into the
same, unless such admission be agreed to by nine States.

XII.
All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of
Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be
deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the
said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pleged.

XIII.
Every State shall abide by the determination of the United States in Congress assembled, on all
questions which by this confederation are submitted to them. And the Articles of this Confederation shall
be inviolably observed by every State, and the Union shall be perpetual; nor shall any alteration at any
time hereafter be made in any of them; unless such alteration be agreed to in a Congress of the United
States, and be afterwards confirmed by the legislatures of every State.

And Whereas it hath pleased the Great Governor of the World to incline the hearts of the legislatures
we respectively represent in Congress, to approve of, and to authorize us to ratify the said Articles of
Confederation and perpetual Union. Know Ye that we the undersigned delegates, by virtue of the power
and authority to us given for that purpose, do by these presents, in the name and in behalf of our
respective constituents, fully and entirely ratify and confirm each and every of the said Articles of
Confederation and perpetual Union, and all and singular the matters and things therein contained: And we
do further solemnly plight and engage the faith of our respective constituents, that they shall abide by the
determinations of the United States in Congress assembled, on all questions, which by the said
Confederation are submitted to them. And that the Articles thereof shall be inviolably observed by the
States we respectively represent, and that the Union shall be perpetual.

In Witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands in Congress. Done at Philadelphia in the State of
Pennsylvania the ninth day of July in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven Hundred and Seventy-
Eight, and in the Third Year of the independence of America.

Agreed to by Congress 15 November 1777 In force after ratification by Maryland, 1 March 1781

Source:
Documents Illustrative of the Formation of the Union of the American States.
Government Printing Office, 1927.
House Document No. 398.
Selected, Arranged and Indexed by Charles C. Tansill

1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_state

2.

http://www.towson.edu/polsci/ppp/sp97/realism/whatisns.htm

WHAT IS A NATION STATE

In a nutshell . . .

The terms nation, state, country and nation-state are used to refer to political,
economic, social and cultural actors in the international system. The modern
nation-state refers to a single or multiple nationalities joined together in a
formal political union. The nation-state determines an official language(s), a
system of law, manages a currency system, uses a bureaucracy to order
elements of society, and fosters loyalties to abstract entities like "Canada,"
"the United States," and so on.

What's the difference between these concepts?

A nation-state differs from a "state" or a "nation" for a couple of important

reasons:

A nation refers only to a socio-cultural entity, a union of people sharing who

can identify culturally and linguistically. This concept does not necessarily
consider formal political unions.

A state refers to a legal/political entity that is comprised of the following: a) a

permanent population; b) a defined territory; c) a government ; and d) the
capacity to enter into relations with other states.

This distinction is an important one because we, as political scientists, must be

able to account for both political and socio-cultural factors in a political entity.
Using the term nation-state, permits this investigation.

What does the growth in the number of nation-states mean?

The growth in the number of nation-states means that nation-states are going
to have to cope with new political, economic, and social realities. The new
entrants in the political system bring with them new opportunities for the
international political system, but also bring new problems that the
international order must be able to approach and attempt to solve.

3.

http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-nation-state.htm

A nation-state is a state, or country, that has defined borders and territory. It

is additionally a country in which a nation of principally the same type of
people exists, organized by either race or cultural background. In the nation-
state, generally, everyone would speak the same language, probably practice
the same or similar types of religion, and share a set of cultural, “national,”
values.

From this strict definition it’s easy to see that the US is not a nation-state. We
have multiple ethnicities, numbers of religions practiced, and different cultural
norms. Even though citizens of the US share the same borders and territory,
we do not, in the sense of the nation-state, share a common nationality.

Another way in which a nation-state cannot exist is when there is a defined

ethnic and cultural group that exists without territorial borders, and complete
right of ownership to those borders. For example, when immigrants to the US
declared the country to be a state, numerous Native American tribes were
nations without being states. The borders of the various Native American
nations were disregarded by the larger US state, resulting in repeated
relocation of these nations to other areas and territories. These territories
were only held at the permission of the US. Today, some tribes do have defined
borders but they still in some cases may be subject to the laws of the US,
making them not fully nation-states.

In fact, most countries do not completely fall within the definition of the
nation-state, since most countries have immigrants. Once immigrants come to
a country, especially in large numbers, the nation-state can no longer exist.
Countries with only a small number of immigrants may still be seen as
containing predominantly the same ethnicity and shared culture and may thus
be considered as approaching the theoretical nation-state.

Iceland is considered almost an ideal nation-state since immigration to Iceland

is quite low. Japan also comes close to being a nation-state because the sense
of national identity and shared language is very strong. It is not coincidental
that both of these countries are islands and thus less “crossing of the border”
can exist.

The Republic of Ireland approaches the nation-state, though immigration to

other countries often led to more Southern Irish people living outside of the
Republic than inside it. It has relatively few immigrants, except returning
nationals or their descendants, and shares a strong national identity. In the
Republic of Ireland, the state is founded on the principles of the nation, with
laws made respecting the deep Catholic beliefs of the country.

The desire to establish a nation-state can be one of the most devastating ones
and may result in either mass eviction of other nationalities or ethnic
cleansing. Hitler attempted to establish Germany as a nation-state by first
exiling Jews, and then ultimately, by killing the majority of Jewish residents in
Germany, and in other countries he conquered like Poland. Attempting to
enforce a nation-state where none truly exists often results in high numbers of
deaths for large minority populations and a lack of humanity to the extreme

4. I copied this part from the end of link #5 below for you to research.

Background: Federal Court of Canada File No. T-1309-08, Kahentinetha et al v.

The Queen: Order of madam Prothonotary Mireille Tabib, October 23, 2008
that the women give $19,460.00 security for the court costs from the
beginning to the end, because they are “ordinarily resident outside of Canada”
as they live in Akwesasne and Kahnawake [FC rule 416(10)a];

On Feb. 26, 2009, Statement of Claim filed on the Reckless disregard for the
safety and security of Indigenous Women at the Canadian Border, Akwesasne,
FCC # T-288-09 between Kahentinetha, of the Kanion’ke:haka, and the Queen,
Sec. 48 Federal Court Act. Filed Feb. 26, 2009, on Hon. John Sims, Deputy
Attorney General of Canada 613-946-2774 Fax 613-952-6006. [Contact:
Marieke Bouchard 613-952-6006; Cynthia Leaver, Regional Assistant 613-952-
3653; Shurman Longo Grenier 613-868-9009; Vincent Veilleux 613-952-6006.]

Art. 27, Geneva Conventions: protected persons are entitled to respect for
their persons, honor, family rights, religious convictions, manners and
customs. They shall be treated humanely especially against violence or
threats and insults. Women should especially be protected against indecent
assault based on race, religion and political opinions.

CANADA ACCIDENTALLY RECOGNIZES MOHAWK

SOVEREIGNTY

MNN. Sept. 8, 2009 The colony of Canada has officially recognized our
sovereignty on Great Turtle Island and has taken steps to abide by the Two
Row Wampum agreement. Canada admits they have no jurisdiction over
Indigenous people and territory.

On June 14, 2008, two women were peacefully crossing the illegal checkpoint
in the middle of Kawenoke Island of Akwesasne. The Canada Border Services
Agency CBSA called in 12 burly well-armed colonial goons to viciously attack
the two women. One elder almost died of a trauma induced heart attack and
the other was severely beaten and held incommunicado.

The two women live in the Mohawk communities of Akwesasne and

Kahnawake. They filed formal complaints with the RCMP, OPP, Mohawk
Akwesasne Police and the CBSA to investigate. All refused. The women were
treated like enemy combatants with no rights. We are being falsely labeled as
insurgents, terrorists and global risks. This violates the Geneva Conventions
1949 which set the standards in international law for humanitarian treatment
of civilians and the victims of conflict. [See notes at end]
The women are not Canadian citizens as the Mohawk Nation never
relinquished our territorial independence. The two women took it to the
Federal Court of Canada, FCA T-1309-08, to address the human rights abuses.
Canada is supposed to live up to its commitments under international law to
respect human rights of all.

The Crown issued orders respecting our sovereignty. On October23, 2008,

Prothonotary Mireille Tabib ordered the two women to pay for Canada ’s costs
by depositing $19,460.00 with the court plus all subsequent costs. The
reason! They live in Akwesasne and Kahnawake and are not residents of
Canada . An appeal was filed. On January 29, 2009 Judge Francois Lemieux
issued the same order. On Feb. 26, 2009 another case was filed by one of the
women, T-288-09. On April 7, 2009, the same order was made because she
lives in Kahnawake, making her a non-resident of Canada .

The Two Row Wampum agreement separates the colonists from the true
original Indigenous jurisdiction. The Crown must fulfill our request to
investigate our complaints against their agents. The CBSA acted outside its
territorial jurisdiction when it assaulted the two women and cannot demand
security for their costs.

The CBSA can never return to Kawenoke Island , the real name of Cornwall
Island , which they abandoned on May 31, 2009. The Mohawks refused to
allow these foreigners to carry guns in the middle of our community. The old
Customs House sits empty and belongs to the Mohawks. CBSA needs to get
their junk out of there. When Alcatraz was abandoned, it returned
automatically to the Indigenous people.

The colony of Canada removed the CBSA checkpoint from Kawenoke to the foot
of the bridge in the city of Cornwall Ontario. Cornwall is part of the Mohawk
North Shore claim. A CBSA supervisor stated to Mohawk elders that the
former Kawenoke Customs had to be officially de-designated as a Canada port
of entry. The new one sits on Akwesasne land. CBSA has to remove its port-
a-potties out of Cornwall to parts unknown, maybe back to England . Phew!

Our territory extends all across this land.In requesting Mohawks to report to
them when leaving Kawenoke, which they formerly treated as part of the
colony of Canada , they are respecting our sovereignty. They actually have no
business asking our people anything. We cannot allow them to interfere with
our natural birthright and our right to travel freely about our homeland or
entering our communities.

The colonial pirates that are attacking and confiscating our legitimate
products on our rivers are also out of their jurisdiction. They have no right
whatsoever to interfere with our trade and commerce anywhere. All
waterways are our highways long before the coming of foreigners to this land
to be freely traversed by us.

These Federal Court of Canada orders recognize that Indigenous people on

Onowaregeh retain international sovereignty. The demand for money is meant
to discourage us from seeking justice against these brutal carpetbaggers.
They are telling us we have to buy justice from them. Canada has no problems
to dish out millions to the band and tribal councils to illegitimately sell us out
and fraudulently try to settle our land claims. It violates the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Our political position does not allow
them to assault or murder us, prevent freedom of speech or violate our human
rights. These organized criminal cartels have no right to extort money from
us. Everything they do falls under every kind of genocide known to
humankind.

The checkpoint had to be removed. The border had to be removed. What’s

next?

To stop the CBSA from coming in, we need to keep our fire going and to erect a
building. To help, please contact akwpeoplesfire@bell.net 613-937-1813.

Kahentinetha MNN Mohawk Nation News, www.mohawknationnews.com

kahentinetha2@yahoo.com Note: Your financial help is needed and
appreciated. Please send your donations by check or money order to “MNN
Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991 , Kahnawake [ Quebec , Canada ] J0L 1B0. Or
go to PayPal on website. Nia:wen thank you very much. Go to MNN “BORDER”
and “AKWESASNE” categories for more stories; New MNN Books Available
now! Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePressStore
http://www.cafepress.com/mohawknews; Subscribe to MNN for breaking news
updates http://.mohawknationnews.com/news/subscription.php; Sign Women
Title Holders petition! http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Iroquois

Background: Federal Court of Canada File No. T-1309-08, Kahentinetha et al v.

The Queen: Order of madam Prothonotary Mireille Tabib, October 23, 2008
that the women give $19,460.00 security for the court costs from the
beginning to the end, because they are “ordinarily resident outside of Canada”
as they live in Akwesasne and Kahnawake [FC rule 416(10)a];

On Feb. 26, 2009, Statement of Claim filed on the Reckless disregard for the
safety and security of Indigenous Women at the Canadian Border, Akwesasne,
FCC # T-288-09 between Kahentinetha, of the Kanion’ke:haka, and the Queen,
Sec. 48 Federal Court Act. Filed Feb. 26, 2009, on Hon. John Sims, Deputy
Attorney General of Canada 613-946-2774 Fax 613-952-6006. [Contact:
Marieke Bouchard 613-952-6006; Cynthia Leaver, Regional Assistant 613-952-
3653; Shurman Longo Grenier 613-868-9009; Vincent Veilleux 613-952-6006.]

Art. 27, Geneva Conventions: protected persons are entitled to respect for
their persons, honor, family rights, religious convictions, manners and
customs. They shall be treated humanely especially against violence or
threats and insults. Women should especially be protected against indecent
assault based on race, religion and political opinions.

The "Bar" Treaty of 1947

Effectively Tying the Bar Associations of the Respective Pan-American States Together
and subverting our Constitution to United Nations International Law

Today an attorney is a sworn officer of the court, and by his own admission, as that
officer, his duty is to impose the will of the state against the citizen.

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

(Organized at Saratoga Springs New York, August 21, 1878)

It's object shall be to advance the science of jurisprudence, promote the administration
of justice and uniformity of legislation and of judicial decision throughout the Nation,
uphold the honor of the profession of the law, encourage cordial intercourse among the
members of the American Bar and to correlate the activities of the Bar organizations of
the respective States on a representative basis, in the interest of the legal profession and
of the public throughout the United States. (ABA Constitution, Article 1)

REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR PEACE AND LAW THROUGH UNITED NATIONS
(relative to the Bar Treaty of 1947)

RECOMMENDATIONS*

Resolved, That the American Bar Association notes with approval the further progress
made, within the structure and Charter of the United Nations, at the recent Inter-
American Conference for the Maintenance of Continental Peace and Security, held at
Quitindinia in Brazil, in implementing the Act of Chapultepec and strengthening further
the spirit of friendly consultations and of submission to law-governed procedures, as well
as the means of united self-defense, throughout the Americas, against aggressions from
outside and for the prevention of the causes of disputes and misunderstandings among
the nations of this hemisphere. The Association hails with particular satisfaction the
Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance, signed at Rio de Janeiro on September 2
by the representatives of nineteen American republics, as a concrete demonstration of
what can be accomplished within the framework of the United Nations, by nations which
are willing to submit themselves to the rule of law and to agree to act together for
mutual assistance and defense against aggression clearly defined.

The Association commends this Treaty to the consideration of the Delegation of the
United States in the General Assembly of the United Nations and to like-minded peoples
because of its clear and specific statement and limitation of its scope and purposes and
especially its acceptance of the principles of decision by a vote of two~thirds of the
member nations on major questions (a majority vote on some others), with a party to a
dispute between members excluded from voting on it, no nation required to use armed
force without its consent, and no right or power on the part of any nation to "veto or
block the defined procedures for pacific settlement of controversies within the Americas
and for united action in the exercise of the inherent right of individual or collective self-
defense recognized by Article 51 of the Charter, against aggression from any source,
anywhere within a Continental American zone defined in the treaty.

Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association hails with especial satisfaction the
progress made at Quitindinia and Rio de Janeiro because it has been fostered actively
and substantially by lawyers of the Americas, through their respective bar associations
and learned academies of the law; and that this Association pledges its continued
support, through its own activities and its participation in the Inter-American Bar
Association, in behalf of the objectives of the treaty and in behalf of peace,
understanding, mutual assistance and self-defense, and the prevalence of the rule of
law, throughout the Americas.
Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association favors and urges the earliest
practicable ratification of the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance by the
Senate of the United States.

* These recommendations were adopted by the House of Delegates

II

Resolved, That the American Bar Association expresses its gratification that the General
Assembly of the United Nations has before it for consideration and action a notable
report by its distinguished committee, which submits definitive plans for the progressive
development and the eventual statement or codification of the rules and principles of
international law.

Resolved Further, That if the International Law Commission proposed by the report is
authorized by the General Assembly and elected by the United Nations, this Association
as an accredited organization long at work in the field shall tender and render to the
Commission and the Secretariat such assistance as they desire that this Association shall
undertake, through its constituted committees and sections as hitherto voted by the
House of Delegates and in close cooperation with The Canadian Bar Association, to the
continuance of which this Association pledges its best efforts.

III

Resolved, That the American Bar Association expresses again its considered opinion to
be that the interests of peace, justice and law throughout the world will best be
advanced through the continuance of united, outspoken support of the United Nations by
the American people, and that efforts to strengthen and extend international
organization, cooperation and control of matters which are international in their scope
should be undertaken within the framework of the United Nations and on the basis of
undivided support of that organization.

Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association urges that lawyers and other
citizens shall do all they can in their home communities to maintain an informed public
opinion in favor of working through the United Nations for accomplishing the great
objectives of the Charter and the Statute of the International Court of Justice.

IV

Resolved, That while the American Bar Association has recognized and urged, at the time
of the adoption and ratification of the Charter in 1945 and since, that strengthening
amendments in several respects will be needed and should be considered in the light of
experience, the Association respectfully submits to the Delegation of the United States in
the General Assembly of the United Nations the Association's opinion that at the present
juncture there is an especial need that, through agreed-on interpretations of the Charter
in the procedural rules or through the formulation and adoption of specific amendments
of the Charter if need be, it shall be assured that two-thirds or other substantial majority
of the nations which wish to submit themselves to the rule of law and accomplish the
pacific settlement of international disputes can take effective action against aggression
and do so within the procedures of the United Nations, beyond the power of a minority to
"veto" and prevent the action of such a majority in these respects.
Resolved Further, That although the American Bar Association hopes that all members of
the United Nations will accede to the principles of effective action by substantial
majorities, such as have lately been accepted by nineteen republics of this hemisphere,
all of which are members of the United Nations, the Association respectfully submits to
the Delegation of the United States in the General Assembly the Association's considered
opinion that any such amendments, if proceeded with, should be specific and sufficient
to accomplish the above-stated purpose, and that consideration should be given to so
conditioning their submission for ratification as to make clear the intention of the
ratifying members to put them into effect between themselves if and when they are
ratified by at least two-thirds of the member States.

Resolved, That the American Bar Association expresses the keen interest of its members
in the proposed International Trade Organization and its proposed Charter, to be given
final form and approval at a conference to convene in Havana, Cuba, on November 21;
and the Association recommends that when copies of the proposed Organization and
Charter become available, the same should be studied carefully and thoroughly by the
Congress and the people of the United States, and also reported on to the House of
Delegates by the Section of International and Comparative Law, the committee on
Commerce, and the Committee for Peace and Law Through United Nations, as hitherto
directed by the House.

Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association is of the opinion that if the final
form of the Organization and Charter would place binding obligations on its members,
the membership of the United States in the Organization and Charter should become
effective only when the same are submitted by the President and ratified by the Senate
as a treaty; and in view of the effect of prospective provisions upon American tariffs,
reciprocal arrangements, and financial obligations, only when approved also by the
House of Representatives of the United States.

VI

Resolved, That the American Bar Association is of the opinion that the foreign policy of
the United States should continue to be in all respects developed, decided and unitedly
supported, without division on party lines or regard for differences on other issues; and
that the members of the Association should to that end cooperate in bringing about in
their respective communities informative public discussions of all questions entering into
the foreign policy of our country, and should take the lead in behalf of an informed and
united support of that policy.

Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association endorses and supports the action of
the Government of the United States in giving assistance to the Government of Greece,
in the exercise of the right of the United States under Article 51 of the Charter to take
individual and collective action in defending against an armed attack upon a member of
the united Nations.

Resolved Further, That the American Bar Association endorses and supports in principle
the proposal of the Government of the United States that the nations of Europe which
need financial and other assistance from the United States in the restoration of their
economy and the maintenance of their governments against aggressions and infiltrations
shall first mobilize their own resources in helping themselves and each other and shall
establish their own organized means of cooperating with each other for the removal of
trade barriers and for the maintenance of united action by themselves against
aggression and propaganda from outside their border; and that the extent of the
financial needs of such nations and the extent of their cooperation in such a policy shall
be ascertained and made known, before the United States undertakes commitments.

VII

Resolved, That officers of the American Bar Association are authorized to transmit copies
of the above resolutions when adopted or of such of them as may be appropriate, to
officials and committees of the United Nations, to officers of the Government of the
United States, to members of the Senate and House of Representatives, and to other
associations and organizations with which this Association is cooperating, including all
organizations represented in the House of Delegates.

REPORT

The matters covered by our recommendations have been so closely followed by

American lawyers that this report will be brief. Their background has been from time to
time reported to the members of our Association through its Journal.

The matters dealt with are of the utmost importance to all the people of our country and
of the world. The General Assembly of the United Nations re-convened in New York City
on September 16, for sessions which seem likely to be decisive as to the future of the
existing international organization. The present prospect is that the Congress of the
United States will be called in special session in November or December to make
decisions on new and urgent phases of the foreign policy of our country and authorize
action to effectuate that policy.

Under the conditions existing in the world today, your committee is of the opinion that its
recommendations, and the action of our Association through the House of Delegates
should be only such as will support and assist those who, in our Government and in the
United Nations, are working earnestly for peace and law, and will help to unite, not
divide, American public opinion.

Against the background of a troubled and troubling world, two heartening events of the
present month are first noted:

1. At Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on September 2, the representatives of the Governments of

all the American republics, who constitute more than one-third of all of the members of
the United Nations, agreed upon, and nineteen of them signed and the two others will
sign, the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance, significant provisions of which
are referred to in our recommendations Nos. 1 and 4 and are hereinafter briefly
discussed.
2. The General Assembly of the United Nations has on its calendar for action during its
current sessions, the comprehensive report and recommendations of the distinguished
committee which it created last December to formulate and submit definitive plans for
the progressive development, and the eventual codification, of the rules and principles of
international law, in a form and content adapted to the needs of the post war world. For
members of our Association who long have worked earnestly for such an objective, this
further progress toward the definitive formulation of international law under the authority
of the United Nations is an encouraging step at a time when many other advances seem
to be stalled.

Law Abiding Nations and Submission to the Rule of Law

Your committee has felt the need for a phrase of characterization that can be used in
place of "peace-loving Nations," to denote those governments and peoples which are
willing to submit themselves to the rule of law in international affairs and conform to it.
Secretary Hull's "peace loving nations" of the 1943 Moscow Conference and Declaration
will not do. All nations claim to be "peace loving," and all or most of them are- some of
them only on their own terms. "Law-abiding nations" may be the best phrase. Its
appropriation from internal, community life is apt. What is meant by a law-abiding citizen
of a city or town is well known. The individual who breaks the peace or considers himself
above the law is readily found out. To "abide" the law and legal procedures and not to
take the law and one's claimed rights into one's own hands is a good English phrase and
a recognized test.. In world affairs, the law-abiding nations are:

1. Those which believe that peace, freedom and security can be secured best (and
probably only) through the rule of law.

2. Those which wish and intend, in a cooperative spirit and through their chosen
representatives, to formulate, establish and support the supremacy of rules and
principles of law, orderly adjudication, and impartial enforcement.

3. Those that by their agreements and their acts stand pledged to abide by and conform
to the laws which majorities have duly established after the views of majorities and
minorities have been democratically expressed and duly considered.

The law-abiding citizen of a community does not insist or expect that his disputes or
rights shall be settled by "negotiations" or by political support from the powerful or by
discussions at the political level. He instinctively and by habit obeys the law as he
understands it to be : if disagreement or dispute as to it arises, he goes to court and
abides the decision.

The policeman who finds a bully beating up a little man does not ask for debate: "Is his
aggression justified?" He asks only: "Is there a law against it?" If he thinks there is, he
stops the attack, hales the aggressor or both parties to court, and lets the law and the
judge decide.

So it should be with nations. The international community should become law-abiding.

The chairman of your committee has made some check as to whether "law-abiding" has
similar connotation in the community life of Canada and Great Britain. Like
understanding seems to prevail.
The Charter of the nations entrusts the development and codification of international law
to the General Assembly. That body is at work on that task. Progress in the Assembly
cannot be blocked by any "veto." For an authoritative body of jurisconsults to state and
declare international and world law will give it great weight and force, will make it a
standard to which law-abiding nations will repair. To give it binding force in the sense that
domestic legislation is law will be a second step, but hardly difficult on the part of
nations that are minded to pledge themselves to abide the rule of law.

Your committee submits the following brief comment on its principal recommendations:

RECOMMENDATION No. 1:

AS TO THE INTER-AMERICAN TREATY OF RECIPROCAL ASSISTANCE

Nineteen American republics, (1) constituting more than one-third of the status in the
British Commonwealth of Nations, the Dominion of Canada did not take part in the
Conference or sign the Treaty, but provision was made for its accession or cooperation, if
Canada so desires and decides. In any event, Canada and the United States have for
many months been taking practical steps for the defense of North America against
attack, and have long resorted to friendly and peaceful means of settling whatever
disputes or problems arise between them.

Of far reaching importance is the fact that the Treaty of Rio de Janeiro contains a clear
definition of elementary acts of aggression which are outlawed in advance and are not
left to ex post facto debate and political action subject to the "veto," as is the case in the
Charter of the United Nations. A further gain is the recognition and specific and basic
averment that "the American regional community affirms as manifest truth that juridical
organization is a necessary prerequisite of security and peace and is founded on justice
and moral order" (Preamble).

In this and other respects, the significance of what has been accomplished by the
nations of the Americas may well be commended at this time to the American Delegation
in the United Nations and to the world. The principles, purposes, and practical
effectiveness of the Charter have been assured as to the Western Hemisphere. What has
been amicably agreed on and done here to outlaw war of aggression, assure the
settlement of disputes by juridical or other peaceful means, and provide for the common
defense against attack, exemplifies what can be done under the Charter. That more than
one-third of the members of the United Nations bind themselves to accept decisions by a
two-thirds vote on actions within that specific and limited field, with out a "veto" power
on the part of any nation, 'may be also a hopeful augury as well as example. The sole
limitation on collective action so determined is that no nation "shall be required to use
armed force without its consent" (Treaty, Article 20), by its vote or otherwise.

The Treaty may thus offer an opportunity, in that it denotes the support of the United
States and other members of the United Nations, in this hemisphere, for principles which
might solve some of the major difficulties under the Charter. No nation will be obligated
to participate in sanctions of a military character unless it has voted for that or otherwise
consented. One of the reasons urged for granting and retaining the "veto," for the five
principal powers, has been that the United States should not put itself in a position
where it might be called on to furnish and use, without its own consent, its armed forces
to enforce non-unanimous decisions.

Your committee recommends that the Association favor the speedy ratification of the
Treaty. (3)

RECOMMENDATION No. 2:

AS TO THE INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION AND THE PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF

INTERNATIONAL LAW

The report of the General Assembly's committee, as submitted to the members of the
United Nations and now pending before the General Assembly at Flushing Meadows, as
summarized in the July JOURNAL (33 A.B.A.J. 727-730 (1947) and published in full in the
August JOURNAL (33 A.B.A. J. 831-835 (1947)

The recommended task is to be entrusted in the first instance, as our Association

recommended in 1945, before the San Francisco Conference (31 A.B.A.J. 227-228; May,
1945) and again to the State Department in May of 1947 (33 A.B.A.J. 728; July, 1947), to
an International Law Commission of fifteen specially qualified jurists and jurisconsults
who will be nominated by the member nations on a basis which will tend to assure that
none will name only its own nationals. (4) They will be elected by the General Assembly
and the Security Council, in the same manner as judges of the International Court of
Justice are elected (4) this also as recommended by our Association (31A.B.A.J. 227-228;
May, 1945).

A statement or codification of the principles and rules of present-day international law,

prepared and issued under the auspices of a body elected in a manner similar to that in
which the members of the World Court are elected, would have great authority and
influence among states which were willing to submit themselves to the rule of law in the
international sphere, irrespective of its adoption and promulgation as a unilateral
agreement having a binding legal force.

Your committees' recommendation extends an assurance of our Association's

cooperation with the International Law Commission and the Secretariat, if the
International Law Commission is created. In assistance to that work and in order that
submissions by our Association in cooperation with The Canadian Bar Association shall
reflect the considered opinion of lawyers in all parts of the two countries, it is expected
that the regional group conferences under the auspices of the two bar associations will
be resumed before the year ends. Eight such conferences in the series were held in
March through May (33 A.B.A.J. 562(1947).

RECOMMENDATION No.3:

AS TO UNITED AMERICAN SUPPORT FOR THE UNITED NATIONS AND FOR WORKING
THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS TO STRENGTHEN IT

Our Association has repeatedly declared for united, undivided support of the United
Nations and its Charter by the American people. Such a declaration is opportune and well
justified at this juncture. "Fidelity to the United Nations" was declared by President
Truman at Rio de Janeiro to be the cornerstone of American policy. It has profoundly
affected and changed that policy, in that organized cooperation with other nations has
become a primary objective.

Up to the present time, the United Nations has been in more than a few respects less
effective that had been fondly hoped when the Charter was signed. Perhaps too much
was expected of it too soon, by some; the machinery and procedures for consultations
and organized cooperation cannot of themselves make all nations law-abiding or instill
immediately a purpose to get along together amicably despite conflicting ideologies.

Memories may be short-lived. Probably good-will and a spirit of understanding and

cooperation are more manifest today among more nations than was the case during the
first ten or more years after World War I. Even in the conspicuous and highly provocative
controversies in which the United Nations has appeared to make little or no headway in
the absence of its General Assembly, many observers have felt that the aggravations
were less acute because the disputants were face to face and around a table, and had to
state and argue their claims in as friendly an atmosphere as could be created.

Beyond a doubt, the rift between the East and the West has thus far created serious
obstructions, which existing procedures and powers have not overcome, But the United
Nations provides the only forum in which the spokesmen for the two "spheres" are
continually brought together; for discussion which is amicable in spirit although
animated and at times divisive. Especially in view of what has recently been
accomplished under the Charter and within the framework of the United Nations, your
committee is of the opinion that efforts to strengthen the Charter and extend the
effectiveness of international organization and cooperation should in any event go
forward on the basis of supporting the United Nations rather than of abandoning or
rejecting the existing international organization.

RECOMMENDATION NO. 4:

AS TO AMENDMENTS OF THE CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS

The General Assembly is in session in New York City. Before its present convocation ends,
the proposal of amendments of the Charter seems certain to receive the consideration of
leaders and delegates in that "town meeting of the world."

Ever since the signing and ratification of the Charter in 1945, our Association has been of
the opinion that strengthening amendments will be needed and should be sought as
experience made it advisable. At the appropriate time, if the United States Delegation in
the Assembly indicates that the judgment and recommendations of our Association are
desired or will be considered, your committee will be prepared to submit specific
suggestions.

At the present time, your committee is of the opinion that action by our Association will
not advisably go beyond the recommendations which accompany this report. The Treaty
between the American republics which comprise more than one-third of the members
may open or point way to interpretations or amendments which will enable prompt and
effective action by a two-thirds vote or other substantial majority. The Charter's
requirement of unanimity of action among the five nations having permanent
representation in the Security Council has given to serious problems. (5) More than a
third of the members of the United Nations, including the United States have agreed that
no such "veto" is needed among any of the nations of this hemisphere, in fulfilling the
paramount purposes of the Charter.

It should of course be recognized that the "vetoes" interposed have been within the
rights of the principal powers under the Charter. No claim that they violated the
provisions of the Charter could be made. On the other hand, many of them are regarded
as violating both the spirit and the letter of the assurances which the five principal
powers gave at the San Francisco Conference, as to the extent and purposes for which
they would use the veto. (6)

Certainly the San Francisco Conference determined and declared that if a "veto" was
interposed as an amendment of the Charter desired by the great majority of the member
nations, that majority was not to be without remedy. (7)

The expressed attitude of the United States, before, and during the first days of the
meeting of the General Assembly, is that (8) "We are not unalterably opposed to every
proposal for a revision of the Charter although we believe that there is at the present
time no need for major revisions of the Charter or for a change in the general character
of the United Nations.

"Many articles of the Charter have not yet been brought into play and given life and
meaning by practical application. None of the principal organs have as yet fully exerted
the authority and influence which are possible under the existing Charter. The members
themselves as represented in the General Assembly have by no means exhausted the
potentialities of the Charter in finding ways and means of overcoming obstruction and of
meeting their common problems While we might be willing to accept certain
amendments to the Charter, we believe that rapid progress can be made in the
immediate future within the general framework which we now have and we shall
ourselves make proposals for utilizing more fully existing machinery."

The nature and scope of the proposals by the United States to fulfill "the potentialities of
the Charter," to find "ways and means of overcoming obstruction," and to accomplish
"rapid progress". . . in the immediate future within the general framework which we now
have," have not been made public at this writing. (9) Basically, they seek the
strengthening of the General Assembly to an extent that its present session "may begin
a new phase in the life of the United Nations." Said Secretary Marshall:

"The General Assembly is the forum in which this skepticism must be forestalled and the
forum in which our disagreements must be resolved. The great moral and political forces
of the world must somehow be brought to bear with full effect through the General
Assembly."

The American proposals will doubtless include all or most of those which Delegate
Herschel V. Johnson informally submitted to the Security Council on August 27, to show
the extent to which agreed-on clarifications and amendments of the Council's procedural
rules could remove obstacles to effective action, without amendment of the Charter. (10)
If these changes had been in effect, they would not have barred the "vetoes" which have
been interposed.

Another proposal favored by some nations is that, through agreement or through

amendment of the Charter if need be, the "veto" shall apply only to sanctions and
enforcement measures by the Security Council and shall not apply to steps for fact-
finding and the peaceful settlement of disputes. This change would have barred all or
most of the "vetoes" which have been blocking action for investigations and efforts to
settle disputes.

If amendments of the Charter are not proceeded with and the law-abiding nations have
to consider and decide as to what individual and collective action they can agree on and
take, within the framework of the Charter and pursuant to its Article 51, a considered
suggestion has been made for a supplementary agreement or protocol for mutual
defense against defined aggression, to be effective among the ratifying nations when
two-thirds of them have ratified. (11)

All but one of the members of your committee are of the present opinion that such
amendments as may be developed and decided on by the General Assembly shall be
submitted under Article 108 of the Charter for ratification and that a General Conference
under Article 109 should not be called at this time, for the drafting of amendments. A
possible alternative or compromise, in the event that the General Assembly is of the
opinion that the formulation of amendments should be considered but that its calendar
for its present regular session is too heavy and congested, has been suggested, to the
effect that the General Assembly vote to meet in special session early in 1948 to
consider amendments, any proposals for amendment to be filed with the Secretary-
General in advance and by him circulated among the member nations. This would be in
lieu of the calling of a Conference under Article 109, which would as a practical matter
be made up of substantially the same persons as are delegates to the General Assembly.

Your committee does not at this time pass upon any of these proposals as such. The
amendments previously recommended by the House of Delegates are along lines which
appear to be worthy of consideration now. There is every prospect that the whole subject
will be spiritedly and thoroughly considered in conferences of the delegations and on the
floor of the General Assembly. An important objective is that the power of the great
majority of the member nations to act together to outlaw war, prevent and punish
aggression, and provide for the peaceful settlement of pro-vocative disputes, shall be
assured beyond doubt. In the opinion of many observers, the present critical issues
among the nations go much deeper than anything that could at present be coped with
through amendments of the Charter.

RECOMMENDATION No. 5:

AS TO THE PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL TRADE ORGANIZATION AND ITS CHARTER

Because rehabilitation of the world's shattered economy and the relief of peoples from
hunger, want, unemployment and despair are essential to the restoration of lasting
peace and the rule of law, American lawyers are naturally interested in proposals to deal
with international economic problems and those of international trade and commerce
through cooperative action under the auspices of an agency of the United Nations. The
provisions of a Charter creating and implementing such an international Trade
Organization may also have important effects on industry and commerce, in respects
which are of interest and concern to lawyers. (12)

Considerable preparatory work as to the Charter of the proposed International Trade

Organization has been done at a conference in session in Geneva, Switzerland, since
April; but the Charter will be given its final form in a Conference to be convened in
Havana, Cuba, on November 21. The form in which the draft Charter will emanate from
the Geneva Conference is not yet available for study by your committee, It is known that
the document has been largely changed from the form in which it was taken to Geneva,
after a few hearings in this country.

The House of Delegates asked your committee, along with the Committee on Commerce
and the Section of International and Comparative Law, to study and report to the House
concerning the International Trade Organization and its proposed Charter.

Under these circumstances, your committee is of the opinion that it would plainly be
premature for the committee or the House at this time to pass upon any phases of the
International Trade Organization or its proposed Charter. Present action by the House of
Delegates may appropriately, in the opinion of your committee, call the attention of the
profession and the public to the importance of the subject, recommend a careful study of
the Charter when copies of it are available, and declare in favor of its being submitted for
ratification by the Senate as a treaty, and for action upon it also by the House of
Representatives, for reasons indicated in our submitted resolution.

Because of their large relationships to tariffs, revenues, and other fiscal matters, as well
as their probable legislative consequences, the projected provisions of the Charter
appear to be such as to come within the intent and practice under the Constitution that
the House of Representatives shall act as to such matters.

RECOMMENDATION No. 6:

AS TO THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES

Our first resolution is for a re-affirmance of our Association's stand that the foreign policy
of the United States should be developed, decided on, supported and carried forward, by
a United country, without division on party lines. (13)

Our second resolution proposes support of the action of our Government in giving
assistance to the Government and people of Greece, under Article 51 of the Charter; Your
committee believes that this basic feature of our country's policy should have the
endorsement of our Association and the support of the American people. (14)

Our final resolution as to foreign policy proposes to declare support for stated basic
principles which are believed to be fundamental for a soundly-conceived plan for the
economic rehabilitation of the shattered economy of Europe, for our own protection
against aggressions and infiltrations which might otherwise come so near our shores and
"region" as to menace all nations of the America. The basic principle underlying
American assistance in money, food, farm equipment, fertilizer, and other essentials of a
free economy, shall be that the free nations of Europe shall first organize and cooperate
to help themselves and each other, on the hard road back to stability, independence,
solvency and peace.

In the opinion of a majority of your committee, the "Marshall Plan" has not yet at this
writing been given sufficiently definite and particularized form to enable or warrant a
declaration approving it as such and by name. But it seems to be highly essential that
the organized bar, and individual lawyers throughout our country, shall do all they can to
bring it about that the principles and reasons underlying the American policy toward
Europe shall be understood and approved by the people. Resolutions which declare and
endorse the vital principles may serve this purpose better than an endorsement by name
of a plan which has not yet been published in a definitive form.

THE SECOND REPORT BY THE COMMISSION AS TO INTERNATIONAL CONTROL OF ATOMIC

ENERGY

Action by the United Nations for effective international control of the production and use
of atomic energy for war purposes is still "stalled" by the attitude of the Soviet Union.
The second report of the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission, created by the
General Assembly at its organizational session in London in February of 1946, was filed
this month. A definitive plan supported by the Nations, including the United Kingdom,
France, China and the United States, was approved by the votes of ten members of the
Commission and transmitted to the Security Council.

Russia voted against it and gave notice on September 6 that it would not waive the
"veto" when the report comes before the Security Council.

Poland protested the report but "abstained" from voting against it in the Commission.
The "sticking-point" is that the Soviet Union insists that only the Security Council shall
decide all questions of sanctions, enforcement, etc., as to violators of the proposed
convention for prohibition or control of atomic weapons in war, and insists further that
there be no waiver or modification of its "veto" power in the council as to action against
violators. (15)

This all-important issue will thus be blocked in the Security Council, but will receive
spirited consideration at some stage of the crucial session of the Assembly.

Proposals have been made that the nations which are willing to submit themselves to
international control and to international and world law on the subject shall proceed with
their convention and give all ratifying nations its benefit and protection.

Your committee reports that in view of the pressure of urgent business before the Senate
of the United States at the short session of the Congress which adjourned on July 26, no
efforts were made by your committee to obtain the introduction and passage of a Senate
resolution for an amended or superseding American Declaration. to eliminate the
Connally reservation as to American acceptance of the "optional" jurisdiction of the
World Court. Such action by the Senate was recommended by the House of Delegates at
its February session on the recommendation of your committee. (see 33 A.B.A.J. 249,
4O0-4O1, 430 (1947).

Several members of the Senate expressed their interest in the subject and their attention
to initiate corrective action at an opportune time.
In conclusion, your committee calls special attention to the declarations in several of its
resolutions, as to the need that lawyers everywhere shall do all they can to aid the
development of public understanding of the issues involved and an informed public
opinion in support of our country's policy in foreign affairs.

Respectfully Submitted

WILLIAM L. RANSOM

Chairman

FREDERIC M. MILLER

Vice-Chairman

REGINALD HEBER SMITH

Secretary

GEORGE A. FINCH

TAPPAN GREGORY

FRANK E. HOLMAN

WILLIAM LOGAN MARTIN

ORIE L. PHILLIPS

M.C.SLOSS

CHARLES W. TILLETT

PHILIP J. WICKSER

King Alfred Plan...REX 84

KING ALFRED*
In the event of widespread and continuing and coordinated racial disturbances in
the United States, King Alfred, at the discretion of the President, is to be put into
action immediately.

PARTICIPATING FEDERAL AGENCIES

National Security Council
Department of Justice
Central Intelligence Agency
Department of Defense
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Interior

PARTICIPATING STATE AGENCIES

(Under Federal Jurisdiction)
National Guard Units
State Police

PARTICIPATING LOCAL AGENCIES

(Under Federal Jurisdiction)
City Police
County Police

Memo: National Security Council

Even before 1954, when the Supreme Court of the United States of America declared unconstitutional
separate educational and recreational facilities, racial unrest and discord had become very nearly a part
of the American way of life. But that way of life was repugnant to most Americans. Since 1954,
however, that unrest and discord have broken out into widespread violence which increasingly have
placed the peace and stability of the nation in dire jeopardy. This violence has resulted in loss of life,
limb and property, and has cost the taxpayers of this nation billions of dollars. And the end is not yet in
sight. This same violence has raised the tremendously grave question as to whether the races can ever
live in peace with each other. Each passing month has brought new intelligence that, despite new laws
passed to alleviate the condition of the Minority, the Minority still is not satisfied. Demonstrations and
rioting have become a part of the familiar scene. Troops have been called out in city after city across
the land, and our image as a world leader severely damaged. Our enemies press closer, seeking the
advantage, possibly at a time during one of these outbreaks of violence. The Minority has adopted an
almost military posture to gain its objectives, which are not clear to most Americans. It is expected,
therefore, that when those objectives are denied the Minority, racial war must be considered inevitable.
When that emergency comes, we must expect the total involvement of all 22 million members of the
Minority, men, women, and children, for once this project is launched, its goal is to terminate, once
and for all, the Minority threat to the whole of the American society, and indeed, the Free World.

Chairman, National Security Council

Preliminary Memo: Department of Interior

Under King Alfred, the nation has been divided into 10 regions. In case of Emergency, Minority
members will be evacuated from the cities by federalized national guard units, local and state police
and, if necessary, by units of the Regular Armed Forces, using public and military transportation, and
detained in nearby military installations until a further course of action has been decided.

1 - Capital Region
2 - Northeast Region
3 - Southeast Region
4 - Great Lakes Region
5 - South Central Region
6 - Deep South Region
7 - Deep South Region II
8 - Great Plains, Rocky mountain Region
9 - Southwest Region
10 - West Coast Region

No attempt will be made to seal off the Canadian and Mexican borders.

Secretary, Department of Interior

* 849-899 King of England who slaughtered thousands under the disguise of protecting the European
religion of Christianity. As a result he was revered as one of the most noble Kings in the history of
England.

Combined Memo: Department of Justice

Preliminary Memo: Federal Bureau of Investigation & Central Intelligence Agency

There are 12 major Minority organizations and all are familiar to the 22 million. Dossiers have been
compiled on the leaders of the organizations, and can be studied in Washington. The material
contained in many of the dossiers, and our threat to reveal that material, has considerably held in check
some of the leaders. Leaders who do not have such usable material in their dossiers have been
approached to take government posts, mostly as ambassadors and primarily in African countries. The
promise of these positions also has materially contributed to a temporary slow-down of Minority
activities. However, we do not expect these slow-downs to be of long duration, because there are
always new and dissident elements joining these organizations, with the potential power to replace the
old leaders. All organizations and their leaders are under constant, 24-hour surveillance. The
organizations are:

1 - The Black Muslims

2 - Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC)
3 - Congress of Racial Equality
4 - Uhuru Movement
5 - Group On Advanced Leadership (GOAL)
6 - Freedom Now Party (FNP)
7 - United Black Nationalists of America (UBNA)
8 - The New Pan-African Movement (TNPAM)
9 - Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC)
10 - The National Urban League (NUL)
11 - The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)
12 - Committee on Racial and Religious Progress (CORARP)

NOTE: At the appropriate time, to be designated by the President, the leaders of some of these
organizations are to be detained ONLY WHEN IT IS CLEAR THAT THEY CANNOT PREVENT
THE EMERGENCY, working with local public officials during the first critical hours. All other
leaders are to be detained at once. Compiled lists of Minority leaders have been readied at the National
Data Computer Center. It is necessary to use the Minority leaders designated by the President in much
the same manner in which we use Minority members who are agents with Central and Federal, and we
cannot, until there is no alternative, reveal King Alfred in all its aspects. Minority members of
Congress will be unseated at once. This move is not without precedent in American history.

Attorney General
Preliminary Memo: Department of Defense

This memo is being submitted in lieu of a full report from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. That report is now
in preparation. There will be many cities where the Minority will be able to put into the street a
superior number of people with a desperate and dangerous will. He will be a formidable enemy, for he
is bound to the Continent by heritage and knows that political asylum will not be available to him in
other countries. The greatest concentration of the Minority is in the Deep South, the Eastern seaboard,
the Great lakes region and the West Coast. While the national population exceeds that of the Minority
by more than ten times, we must realistically take into account the following:

1 - An estimated 40-50 percent of the white population will not, for various reasons, engage the
Minority during an Emergency.
2 - American Armed Forces are spread around the world. A breakout of war abroad means fewer
troops at home to handle the Emergency.
3 - Local law enforcement officials must contain the Emergency until help arrives, though it may mean
fighting a superior force. New York City, for example, has a 25,000 man police force, but there are
about one million Minority members in the city.

We are confident that the Minority would hold any city it took for only a few hours. The lack of
weapons, facilities, logistics --- all put the Minority at a final disadvantage.
Since the Korean War, this department has shifted Minority members of the Armed Forces to areas
where combat is most likely to occur, with the aim of eliminating, through combat, as many combat-
trained military servicemen as possible. Today the ratio of Minority member combat deaths in
Vietnam, where they are serving as “advisors,” is twice as high as the Minority population ratio to the
rest of America. Below is the timetable for King Alfred as tentatively suggested by the JCS who
recommend that the operation be made over a period of eight hours:

1. Local police and Minority leaders in action to head off the Emergency.
2. Countdown to eight hours begins at the moment the President determines the Emergency to be:
a. National
b. Coordinated
c. Of Long Duration (8th hour)
3. County police join local police (7th hour)
4. State police join county and local police (6th hour)
5. Federal marshals join state, county, and local forces (5th hour)
6. National guards federalized, held in readiness (4th hour)
7. Regular Armed Forces alerted, take up positions; Minority troops divided and detained,
along with all white sympathizers, under guard (3rd hour)
8. All minority leaders, national and local detained (2nd hour)
9. President addresses Minority on radio-television,
gives it one hour to end the Emergency (1st hour)
10. All units under regional commands into the Emergency (0 hour)
“0” Committee Report:

Survey shows that during a six-year period, production created 9,000,000 objects, or 1,500,000 each
year. Production could not dispose of the containers, which proved a bottleneck. However, that was
almost 20 years ago. We suggest that vaporization techniques be employed to overcome the production
problems inherent in King Alfred.
(The “0” Committee Report is referring to the problems that occurred in Nazi Germany when the
furnaces were not hot enough to burn the bodies that Hitler had killed. The bodies clogged up the
furnaces thereby causing a problem that the above committee recommends avoiding by building high-
volume (nuclear-powered) incinerators that burn 5,000 degrees. It should be noted that steel melts at
approximately 2700 degrees!)

Note: Dr. Ray Hagin (Pastor and Professor at the Afrikan Village Center in St. Louis, Missouri).