Well Intervention

Surgi-Jet Perforating
Presented by: Mohamed Omar
PE Algeria

Table Of Content

Concept of SurgiJet
Advantage of SurgiJet Vs conventional Perforating
Application Of SurgiJet
Prefrac Job
Associated with frac job (Surgifrac)
Production
Cement Remedial job
Depth Correlation
Calculation demonstration
Case histories
Prefrac Job case
Production perforation case history
Cement remedial job
Conclusion

Well Intervention

SurgiJet Perforating

Well Intervention

SurgiJetting Perforations
Eroded Perf Tunnels
Reduced NearWellbore Fracture
Entry Issues
High Concentration of
Proppant at the
Perforations

Well Intervention

Hard Rock Perforating

What You Want

Well Intervention

What You Get

Well Intervention

SurgiJet Perforation

Well Intervention

Explosive Perforation

Well Intervention

Penetration vs. Time

Time to Penetrate function of:

Hydra-Jet tool standoff

Casing thickness & grade

Jets ID

Pressure drop across jets

Cement sheath thickness

Formation hardness

Abrasive material

Well Intervention

Hydra-jet Tool Selection

Considerations

Minimum standoff between tool and

casing

Number of jets

Jet ID

Jets phasing

Well Intervention

Tool Sizes Exist in Algeria

Well Intervention

Application Of SurgiJet
Prefrac Job
Associated with frac job (Surgifrac)
Production
Cement Remedial squeeze

Well Intervention

Surgijet Perforating History in Algeria

45
40
New State rules on Transportation of
perforating guns

35

Number of Jobs

30
25
`

20
15
10
5

0
05-Sep-05

24-Mar-06

10-Oct-06

28-Apr-07

Well Intervention

14-Nov-07

01-Jun-08

18-Dec-08

06-Jul-09

22-Jan-10

# Of Jobs for each application

Perfs to
circulate
cement

Perfs
to Frac

# Of Jobs

18

Well Intervention

Perfs to reduce
Injection
pressure

Perfs for
production

10

SurgiJet Job Chart

A
6000

Stages

A Flow Rate
A Depth
6

10

11

C
E
12

13

14

15

16

E
11800

20

17

5000

C
6

18

(psi)

4000

11780
4

3000

2000

(bpm)

19

11760

11740
1000

0
12:00

12:30

13:00

13:30

1 7 /0 3 /2 0 0 8

14:00

14:30

15:00

Time

Load CT with SLF

12:00:08

Pull up to Stage 3

0
15:30
1 7 /0 3 /2 0 0 8

Start Perforating 1st Stage

12:16:24

Pull up to Stage 2

12:32:18

12:47:16

Pull up to Stage 4

13:02:06

Pull up to Stage 5

13:16:21

Pull up to Stage 6

13:30:42

10

Pull up to Stage 7

13:45:07

11

Pull up to Stage 8

13:59:57

12

Pull up to Stage 9

14:14:18

13

Pull up to Stage 10

14:28:39

14

Pull up to Stage 11

14:43:32

15

Stage 12 /Stop Sand

14:57:55

16

Switch to high vis p ill

15:14:49

17

Run in to tag bottom

15:16:07

18

Switch to TW

15:19:37

19

Tag fill @ 11,787 ft

15:20:17

20

Tag bottom Circ hole

15:26:14

CTWin v1.6.2
20-Mar-08 20:25

Well Intervention

11720

(ft)

ROM 20 Surgijet Perforating

Tubing Pressure
Wellhead Pressure

Case History 1: Prefrac job

Comparison between frac jobs in the same formation
Main Treatment Attempt #1
A
20000

Treating Pressure (psig)

Slurry Rate (bpm)
BH Proppant Conc (lb/gal)
1

Main Treatment Complete Job

A Calc'd BH Pres (psi)

B Slurry Proppant Conc (lb/gal)
C 7" Annulus (psi)
3

A
C
A B C
100 50
6

A
22000

Treating Pressure (psi)

Slurry Proppant Conc (lb/gal)
1

19800

A Calc'd BH Pres (psi)

C BH Proppant Conc (lb/gal)
5

7
6

9 10 11

A Slurry Rate (bpm)

C
12

13 14

B C
60 60

15 18

54 54

19

18000

90

45

16000

80

40

17600

48 48

14000

70

35

15400

42 42

12000

60

30

13200

36 36

10000

50

25

11000

30 30

8000

40

20

8800

24 24

6000

30

15

6600

18 18

4000

20

10

4400

12 12

2000

10

2200

0
14:20

0
12:00

12:20

5/22/2008

Customer: Repsol

12:40

13:00

13:20

13:40

14:00

5/22/2008

Time

Job Date: May 22, 2008

0
11:20

Job Type: Main Treatment

Well Intervention

H A L L IB U R T O N
INSITE for Stimulation v3.1.4

03/02/2009

11:40

12:00
Time

12:20

12:40
03/02/2009

Case History 2: Prefrac Job

Before and After Hydrajet Perforating
Impulse Fracture Injection
A
12000

Tubing Pressure (psi)

Annulus Pressure (psi)

Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT)

A Calc'd BH Pressure (psi)

A Slurry Rate (bpm)

A
B B

12
1

11000

10

9000

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

1
13:32

13:33

13:34

13:35

13:36

13:37

13:38

20/12/2006

13:39

Job Date: 20-December-06

Formation: Lochkovian

A
B B

100
2

8000

80

6000

60

4000

40

2000

20

0
13:40

0
13:16

20/12/2006

23/12/2006

13:18

13:20

13:22

13:24

13:26

13:28

13:30

13:32

13:34

0
13:36
23/12/2006

Time
Customer: Total
Well #: IRS-1

A Calc'd BH Pressure (psi)

A Slurry Rate (bpm)

11

10000

0
13:31

A
10000

Tubing Pressure (psi)

Annulus Pressure (psi)

Time
Job Type: IFI
Country: Algeria

Well Intervention

H A LL IB U R T O N

StimWin v4.8.2
31-Dec-06 13:12

Customer: Total
Well #: IRS-1

Job Date: 23-December-06

Formation: Lochkovian

Job Type: DFIT

Country: Algeria

H A LL IB U R T O N

StimWin v4.8.2
01-Jan-07 09:11

Cement Squeeze Job

A
8000

B
500

AL-2 Surgijetting Perforations Overall

Tubing Pressure (psi)
A Wellhead Pressure (psi)
Depth (ft)
E Flow Rate (bpm)
1

7000
6000
5000

400

7
6

9
8

10 11

13

14

12

16

17 18

15

19

20

23

24

25

B
C

26

27

21
22

300

4000
3000
2000

200
100

1000
0

0
16:00

18:00

20:00

22:00

00:00

07/07/2008

02:00

08/07/2008

04:00
08/07/2008

Time
Event Log
1

Open BOPS

07/07/2008 15:31:10

P/U pipe

07/07/2008 15:31:30

P/U to first shot

07/07/2008 15:39:04

On depth for first shot

07/07/2008 15:49:03

test pump lines to 7000 psi

07/07/2008 16:03:27

blee the pressure off

07/07/2008 16:08:05

start punping 8 bbl of gel

07/07/2008 16:45:06

switch to sand

07/07/2008 16:50:27

switch to gel

07/07/2008 17:01:55

10

P/U to second shot

07/07/2008 17:21:39 11

pooh

07/07/2008 17:40:21

13

17:55 stop CTwait to get water 07/07/2008 18:43:16 14

16

Swamp out halliburton pump

19

stop CT ready for second shot 07/07/2008 17:36:03 12

rih

07/07/2008 19:58:39 15

stop CT ready for next shot

07/07/2008 20:07:04

07/07/2008 20:42:45 17

Test Bj pump lines

07/07/2008 22:18:08 18

start sand using BJ pump

07/07/2008 22:35:08

switch to gel

07/07/2008 22:41:32 20

switch to mud

07/07/2008 22:56:54 21

rih

07/07/2008 23:01:44

22

Reduce rate

07/07/2008 23:05:43 23

stop CT swipe the sand

07/07/2008 23:25:14 24

POOH

08/07/2008 00:05:19

25

CT on surface

08/07/2008 01:29:06 26

start pumping fresh water

08/07/2008 01:49:21 27

Rigged down Leave location

08/07/2008 04:45:55

CTWin v1.6.2
28-Jul-08 10:38

Well Intervention

C
10

E
10000

9000

8000

7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

Case History 3
Well 1 and Well 2 Wellhead Performance relationship Comparison

Well Intervention

Conclusion
Increase Productivity
Decrease Nearwellbore damage
Help easily initiate the fracture
Eliminate NPT caused by waiting on explosives
Less safety concerns compared to explosives

Well Intervention

 What do you think?

Well Intervention