Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

1 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

28

21 captures

2005 2008

3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

"Those who say it cannot be done should not interfere with those of us who are doing it" - S. Hickman
Home

Knowledge is Freedom

Against the
Grain
Paul,
Livid Leigh
Boilin' Ed
D. Tom
The Informer
Knowledge is
Freedom
Privacy
Links
Court Case
Contact Us

1994 - 2007
Against the Grain
Site Design, Hosting and
Logo
by DNA Web Media

I dont want to reinvent the wheel, but will attempt to pull from my earlier research a few quotes and place them
in this one email. It will take you some time to study them, but you will be well served to do so, without it there
is no way you can know who controls this country and just how far down the ladder you come. I hope it will
convey legal and historical facts, so you will come away with an understanding of where we are in the chain of
land ownership, thereby understanding your personal status, because if you are living an illusion as all
Americans are, how can we ever hope to go back to the Constitutional government, we believe we have. After
you have read all this, read the comments of Patrick Henry; if you dont have his speeches I can send them to
you, he understood what was being setup. The below quotes are just a sampling of the facts on our Conquest, I
am also sending the third Chapter of a book I wrote, that goes into in more depth, the post Civil War Conquest.
The quotes below will be sufficient for you or anyone reading them, to form your own conclusions, they speak
for themselves.
Years ago, when studying the sovereignty issue, of which I believed myself to be, I came across a court case in
my county, since I was also fighting local property tax, a case stating that your mere presence in the county made
you subject to the tax. In other words your body being in the geographical area of the county meant you were
taking advantage of the countys resources, making you libel to taxation. For years I defied this, not
understanding how they could do that, nor understanding the law that was being used. In believing I was
sovereign and had allodial property, I believed the county, state and federal government had no claim to my land
or money earned by my labor.
Then I learned via research, my belief was provided to me through propaganda, and selected history taught by
the public schools, media and the government. We were all taught that we were freeman, and the sovereigns, and
that government existed by our leave. That we owned our land as a part of our history and heritage, that all these
things were guaranteed by the 1787 Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the common law that founded them.
This is as you will see an illusion and a lie for a number of reasons, but I will deal with only one, Conquest, and
the body of law that made it possible.
From the outset of our Constitution it was doomed, because it recognized the Power of emergency, to be
exercised by the President as Commander-in-Chief, so only one man need be controlled to overcome our
declared freedom. Rather than hear my opinion of the facts, below are the facts, for you to read for yourself.
Following is a list of the contained subject matter, broken down in to sections.
DEATH OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY, PASSED TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
THE COURTS RECOGNIZE THE INSULAR POWER CLAIMED BY CONGRESS
UNDERSTANDING ADMIRALTY POWER OF THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF
UNDERSTANDING CONQUEST AND MILITARY OCCUPATION
DEATH OF THE 1787 CONSTITUTION, BY POST CIVIL WAR CONQUEST

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

2 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

OVERSIGHT OF THE CONQUEST WAS TURNED OVER TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

21CONGRESSIONAL
captures
RECORD ON TH
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28
2005 2008

ALLODIAL PROPERTY VS. TENET ON THE LAND

DEATH OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY, PASSED TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
"How was this accomplished, in reading the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol I, 1789-1897 I
discovered the following:
Gentlemen of the Senate:
Pursuant to the powers vested in me by the act entitled "An act repealing after the last day of June next the duties
heretofore laid upon distilled spirits imported from abroad and laying others in their stead, and also upon spirits
distilled within the United States, and for appropriating the same," I have thought fit to divide the United States
into the following districts, namely:
The district of New Hampshire, to consist of the State of New Hampshire; the district of Massachusetts, to
consist of the State of Massachusetts; the district of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, to consist of the
State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations; the district of Connecticut, to consist of the State of
Connecticut; the district of Vermont, to consist of the State of Vermont; the district of New York, to
consist of the State of New York; the district of New Jersey, to consist of the State of New Jersey; the district of
Pennsylvania, to consist of the State of Pennsylvania; the district of Delaware, to consist of the State of
Delaware; the district of Maryland, to consist of the State of Maryland; the district of Virginia, to consist of the
State of Virginia; the district of North Carolina, to consist of the State of North Carolina; the
district of South Carolina; and the district of Georgia, to consist of the State of the State of Georgia .Page 99
March 4, 1791 In George Washingtons Proclamation of March 30, 1791 he declares the District of Columbia to
be created and its borders established, he says further:
"And Congress by an amendatory act passed on the 3rd day of the present month of March have given further
authority to the President of the United States...."
This completely changed the landscape, and for the first time, the Commander-in-Chief, could operate outside of
the Constitution as a matter of National Security. Even more than this it established the Commander-in-Chiefs
law above the common law. It put in place a military government, created state overlays of military jurisdiction,
called Districts. It placed the controlling bodies, District courts and country sheriffs within that jurisdiction. This
was also done to allow the Bank of the United States to operate in the United States, which was setup just after
Washingtons Act. However, the 1787 Constitution still existed and was still a problem for them, through the
body of stare decisis it embraced. Congress then passed the Act of 1845, bringing the law of the sea on land.
This attack on the 1787 Constitution left its defense to the third branch of our government, the courts, to reject
this grab for power by the Executive and Congress. What did they do? They sided with Congress, changing the
legal stare decisis law, with common law as its foundation, replacing it with Admiralty law, bringing about the
Insular Cases, giving Congress legislative power independent of the Constitution. This was the next step in
destroying the 1787 Constitution, but the end was not yet. You have to understand these definitions below, before
you will understand what Washington and Congress did, which will bring us to the Conquest.
THE COURTS RECOGNIZE THE INSULAR POWER CLAIMED BY CONGRESS
"Next to revenue (taxes) itself, the late extensions of the jurisdiction of the admiralty are our greatest grievance.
The American Courts of Admiralty seem to be forming by degrees into a system that is to overturn our
Constitution and to deprive us of our best inheritance, the laws of the land. It would be thought in England a
dangerous innovation if the trial, of any matter on land was given to the admiralty." Jackson v. Magnolia, 20
How. 296 315, 342 (U.S. 1852)
"These courts, then, are not constitutional courts in which the judicial power conferred by the Constitution on the
general government can be deposited. They are incapable of receiving it. They are legislative courts, created in
virtue of the general right of sovereignty which exists in the government, or in virtue of that clause which
enables Congress to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory belonging to the united States.
The jurisdiction with which they are invested is not a part of that judicial power which is conferred in the third
article of the Constitution, but is conferred by Congress in the execution of those general powers which that body
possesses over the territories of the United States." Harvard Law Review, Our New Possessions. page 481.
"...[T]he United States may acquire territory by conquest or by treaty, and may govern it through the exercise of
the power of Congress conferred by Section 3 of Article IV of the Constitution...

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

3 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

In exercising this power, Congress is not subject to the same constitutional limitations, as when it is legislating
for the United States. ...And in general the guaranties of the Constitution, save as they are limitations upon the
21exercise
captures
of executive and legislative power when exerted for or over our insular possessions, extend to them only
2005 2008
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10
as Congress, in the exercise of its legislative power over territory belonging to the United States, has made those
guarantees applicable."

28

[Hooven & Allison & Co. vs Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945)
"The idea prevails with some indeed, it found expression in arguments at the bar that we have in this country
substantially or practically two national governments; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its
restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument, by exercising
such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise.
I take leave to say that if the principles thus announced should ever receive the sanction of a majority of this
court, a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will be the result. We will, in that event,
pass from the era of constitutional liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of
legislative absolutism.
It will be an evil day for American liberty if the theory of a government outside of the supreme law of the land
finds lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence. No higher duty rests upon this court than to exert its full
authority to prevent all violation of the principles of the constitution."
[Downes vs Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)]

UNDERSTANDING ADMIRALTY POWER OF THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF

"Pursuant to U.S.C. Chapter 1, 2, and 3; Executive Order No. 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military
flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE,
bordered on three sides. The President of the United states designates this deviation from the regular flag, by
executive order, and in his capacity as COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Armed forces."
"...The agency of the master is devolved upon him by the law of the flag. The same law that confers his authority
ascertains its limits, and the flag at the mast-head is notice to all the world of the extent of such power to bind the
owners or freighters by his act. The foreigner who deals with this agent has notice of that law, and, if he be
bound by it, there is not injustice. His notice is the national flag which is hoisted on every sea and under which
the master sails into every port, and every circumstance that connects him with the vessel isolates that vessel in
the eyes of the world, and demonstrates his relation to the owners and freighters as their agent for a specific
purpose and with power well defined under the national maritime law." Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1914.
"It is only with the extent of powers possessed by the district courts, acting as instance courts of admiralty, we
are dealing. The Act of 1789 gives the entire constitutional power to determine "all civil causes of admiralty and
maritime jurisdiction," leaving the courts to ascertain its limits, as cases may arise." Waring ET AL,. v. Clarke,
Howard 5 12 L. ed.
1847

UNDERSTANDING CONQUEST AND MILITARY OCCUPATION

The following is the definition of Conquest:
"The acquisition of the sovereignty of a country by force of arms, exercised by an independent power which
reduces the vanquished to submission to its empire."
"The intention of the conqueror to retain the conquered territory is generally manifested by formal proclamation
of annexation, and when this is combined with a recognized ability to retain the conquered territory, the transfer
of sovereignty is complete. A treaty of peace based upon the principle of uti possidetis (q.v.) is formal
recognition of conquest."
"The effects of conquest are to confer upon the conquering state the public property of the conquered state, and
to invest the former with the rights and obligations of the latter; treaties entered into by the conquered state with
other states remain binding upon the annexing state, and the debts of the extinct state must be taken over by it.
Conquest likewise invests the conquering state with sovereignty over the subjects of the conquered state. Among

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

4 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

subjects of the conquered state are to be included persons domiciled in the conquered territory who remain there
after the annexation. The people of the conquered state change their allegiance but not their relations to one
21another."
capturesLeitensdorfer v. Webb, 20 Ho
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28

2005 2008

"After the transfer of political jurisdiction to the conqueror the municipal laws of the territory continue in force
until abrogated by the new sovereign." American Ins. Co. v. Canter, 1 Pet. (U.S.) 511, 7 L. Ed. 242. Conquest, In
international Law. - Bouviers Law Dictionary
Military Occupation
"This at most gives the invader certain partial and limited rights of sovereignty. Until conquest, the sovereign
rights of the original owner remain intact. Conquest gives the conqueror full rights of sovereignty and,
retroactively, legalizes all acts done by him during military occupation. Its only essential is actual and exclusive
possession, which must be effective."
"A conqueror may exercise governmental authority, but only when in actual possession of the enemys country;
and this will be exercised upon principles of international law; MacLeod v. U.S., 229 U.S. 416, 33 Sup. Ct 955,
57 L. Ed. 1260."
"The occupant administers the government and may, strictly speaking, change the municipal law, but it is
considered the duty of the occupant to make as few changes in the ordinary administration of the laws as
possible, though he may proclaim martial law if necessary. He may occupy public land and buildings; he cannot
alienate them so as to pass a good title, but a subsequent conquest would probably complete the title..."
"Private lands and houses are usually exempt. Private movable property is exempt, though subject to
contributions and requisitions. The former are payments of money, to be levied only by the commanderin-chief...Military necessity may require the destruction of private property, and hostile acts of communities or
individuals may be punished in the same way. Property may be liable to seizure as booty on the field of battle, or
when a town refuses to capitulate and is carried by assault. When military occupation ceases, the state of things
which existed previously is restored under the fiction of postliminium (q.v.)"
"Territory acquired by war must, necessarily, be governed, in the first instance, by military power under the
direction of the president, as commander-in-chief. Civil government can only be put in operation by the action of
the appropriate political department of the government, at such time and in such degree as it may determine. It
must take effect either by the action of the treaty-making power, or by that of congress. So long as congress has
not incorporated the territory into the United States, neither military occupation nor cession by treaty makes it
domestic territory, in the sense of the revenue laws. Congress may establish a temporary government, which is
not subject to all the restrictions of the constitution. Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244, 21 Sup Ct. 770, 45 L. Ed.
1088, per Gray, J., concurring in the opinion of the court." Bouviers Law Dictionar
"While it is held to be the right of a conqueror to levy contributions upon the enemy in their seaports, towns, or
provinces which may be in his military possession by conquest, and to apply the proceeds to defray the expenses
of the war, this right is to be exercised within such limitations that it may not savor of confiscation. As the result
of military occupation, the taxes and duties payable by the inhabitants to the former government become payable
to the military occupant, unless he sees fit to substitute for them other rates or modes of contributions to the
expenses of the government. The moneys so collected are to be used for the purpose of paying the expenses of
government under the military occupation, such as the salaries of the judges and the police, and for the payment
of the expenses of the army." Macleod v. U.S, 229 U.S. 416 1913
Martial Law - Military jurisdiction - Military necessity Retaliation
"Article 1. A place, district, or country occupied by an enemy stands, in consequence of the occupation, under
the Martial Law of the invading or occupying army, whether any proclamation declaring Martial Law, or any
public warning to the inhabitants, has been issued or not. Martial Law is the immediate and direct effect and
consequence of occupation or conquest.
Art. 2. Martial Law does not cease during the hostile occupation, except by special proclamation, ordered by the
commander in chief; or by special mention in the treaty of peace concluding the war, when the occupation of a
place or territory continues beyond the conclusion of peace as one of the conditions of the same.
Art. 3. Martial Law in a hostile country consists in the suspension, by the occupying military authority, of the
criminal and civil law, and of the domestic administration and government in the occupied place or territory, and
in the substitution of military rule and force for the same, as well as in the dictation of general laws, as far as
military necessity requires this suspension, substitution, or dictation.

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

5 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

The commander of the forces may proclaim that the administration of all civil and penal law shall continue either
wholly or in part, as in times of peace, unless otherwise ordered by the military authority."
21 captures
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28

2005 2008

{Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field, prepared by Francis Lieber, LL.D.,
Originally Issued as General Orders No. 100, Adjutant Generals Office,
1863, Washington 1898: Government Printing Office.}"

DEATH OF THE 1787 CONSTITUTION, BY POST CIVIL WAR CONQUEST

Everyone has always concentrated on the 1st section of the 14th Amendment, never thinking of the Amendments
connection with the Reconstruction Acts. Read the Reconstruction Acts, then take notice to section 3, which
prevents anyone holding public office to aid anyone challenging the public policy. Section 4 declares the right of
the conqueror to recoup the cost of the conquest and the operation of the occupying government, and I mean
every aspect of government. Also, denying the conquered the ability to challenge the debt they create while they
occupy, ergo we have a 6 trillion dollar debt, they hold us responsible for.
Fourteenth amendment:
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens
of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any
State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within
its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers,
counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at
any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in
Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to
any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in
any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be
reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male
citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and
Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having
previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any
State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United
States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies
thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for
payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of
insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all
such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
"As a result of these decisions, enforcement of the Reconstruction Act against the Southern States, helpless to
resist military rule without aid of the judiciary, went forward unhampered. Puppet governments were founded in
these various States under military auspices. Through these means the adoption of new state constitutions,
conforming to the requirements of Congress, was accomplished. Likewise, one by one, these puppet state
governments ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, which their more independent predecessors had rejected.
Finally, in July 1868, the ratifications of this amendment by the puppet
governments of seven of the ten Southern States, including Louisiana, gave more than the required ratification
by three-fourths of the States, and resulted in a Joint Resolution adopted by Congress and a Proclamation by the
Secretary of State, both declaring the Amendment ratified and in force." Tulane Law
Review, The Dubious Origin Of The Fourteenth Amendment. page 36
"Despite the fact that the southern States had been functioning peacefully for two years and had been counted to

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

6 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

secure ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment , Congress passed the Reconstruction Act, which provided for
the military occupation of 10 of the 11 southern States. It excluded Tennessee from military occupation and one
21must
captures
suspect it was because Tennessee
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28

2005 2008

The Act further disfranchised practically all white voters and provided that no Senator or Congressman from the
occupied States could be seated in Congress until a new Constitution was adopted by each State which would be
approved by Congress.
The Act further provided that each of the 10 States was required to ratify the proposed Fourteenth
Amendment must become a part of the Constitution of the United States before the military occupancy would
cease and the States be allowed to have seats in Congress." Dyett v. Turner 439 p2d 266 @ 269, 20 U2d 403.
The following, is an excerpt from Joint Resolution No.1 of the State of New Jersey of March 24, 1868, when
they rescinded their prior ratification and rejected:
"It being necessary, by the Constitution, that every amendment to the same, should be proposed by two thirds of
both Houses of Congress, the authors of said proposition, for the purpose of securing the assent of the requisite
majority, determined to, and did, exclude from the said two Houses eighty representatives form eleven States of
the Union, upon the pretence that there were no such States in the Union; but, finding that two-thirds of the
remainder of said Houses could not be brought to assent to the said proposition, they deliberately formed and
carried out the design of mutilating the integrity of the United States Senate, and without any pretext or
justification, other than the possession of power, without the right and in palpable violation of the Constitution,
ejected a member of their own body, representing this State, and thus practically denied to New Jersey its equal
suffrage in the Senate and thereby nominally secured the vote of two-thirds of the said Houses."
"The object of dismembering the highest representative assembly in the Nation, and humiliating a State of the
Union, faithful at all times to all of its obligations, and the object of said amendment were one- to place new and
unheard of powers in the hands of a faction, that it might absorb to itself all executive, judicial and legislative
power, necessary to secure to itself immunity for the unconstitutional acts it had already committed, and those it
has since inflicted on a too patient people."
"The subsequent usurpation of these once national assemblies, in passing pretended laws for the establishment,
in ten States, of martial law, which is nothing but the will of the military commander, and therefore inconsistent
with the very nature of all law, for the purpose reducing to slavery men of their own race to those States, or
compelling them, contrary to their own convictions, to exercise the elective franchise in obedience to dictation of
a fraction in those assemblies; the attempt to commit to one man arbitrary and uncontrolled power, which they
have found necessary to exercise to force the people of those States into compliance with their will; the authority
given to the Secretary of War to use the name of the President, to countermand its Presidents order, and to
certify military orders to be by the direction of the President when they are notoriously known to be contrary to
the Presidents direction, thus keeping up the forms of the Constitution to which the people are accustomed, but
practically deposing the President from his office of Commander-in-Chief, and suppressing one of the great
departments of the Government, that of the executive; the attempt to withdraw from the supreme judicial tribunal
of the Nation the jurisdiction to examine and decide upon the conformity of their pretended laws to the
Constitution, which was the Chief function of that August tribunal, as organized by the fathers of the republic:
all are but amplified explanations of the power they hope to acquire by the adoption of the said amendment."
"To conceal from the people the immense alteration of the fundamental law they intended to accomplish by the
said amendment, they gilded the same with propositions of justice..."
"It imposes new prohibitions upon the power of the State to pass laws, and interdicts the execution of such part
of the common law as the national judiciary may esteem inconsistent with the vague provisions of the said
amendment; made vague for the purpose of facilitating encroachment upon the lives, liberties and property of the
people."
"It enlarges the judicial power of the United States so as to bring every law passed by the State, and every
principle of the common law relating to life, liberty, or property, within the jurisdiction of the Federal tribunals,
and charges those tribunals with duties, to the due performance of which they, from their nature and
organization, and their distance from the people, are unequal."
"It makes a new apportionment of representatives in the National courts, for no other reason than thereby to
secure to a faction a sufficient number of votes of a servile and ignorant race to outweigh the intelligent voices of
their own."
"This Legislature, feeling conscious of the support of the largest majority of the people that has ever been given
expression to the public will, declare that the said proposed amendment being designed to confer, or to compel
the States to confer, the sovereign right of elective franchise upon a race which has never given the slightest

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

7 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

evidence, at any time, or in any quarter of the globe, of its capacity of self-government, and erect an
impracticable standard of suffrage, which will render the right valueless to any portion of the people was
21intended
capturesto overthrow the system of self-government under which the people of the United States have for eighty
2005 2008
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10
years enjoyed their liberties, and is unfit, from its origin, its object and its matter, to be incorporated with the
th
fundamental law of a free people." (The 14 Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the threat
that it poses to our democratic government, Pinckney G. McElwee, South Carolina Law Quarterly 1959)

28

A portion of the Veto message of Andrew Johnson.

"It is plain that the authority here given to the military officer amounts to absolute despotism. But to make it still
more unendurable, the bill provides that it may be delegated to as many subordinates as he chooses to appoint,
for it declares that he shall punish or cause to be punished. Such a power has not been wielded by any Monarch
in England for more than five hundred years. In all that time no people who speak the English language have
borne such servitude. It reduces the whole population of the ten States- all persons, of every color, sex and
condition, and every stranger within their limits- to the most abject and degrading slavery. No master ever had a
control so absolute over the slaves as this bill gives to the military officers over both white and colored
persons...."
"I come now to a question which is, if possible, still more important. Have we the power to establish and carry
into execution a measure like this? I answer, Certainly not, if we derive our authority from the Constitution and
if we are bound by the limitations which is imposes."....
"...The Constitution also forbids the arrest of the citizen without judicial warrant, founded on probable cause.
This bill authorizes an arrest without warrant, at pleasure of a military commander. The Constitution declares
that no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime unless on presentment of a
grand jury. This bill holds ever person not a soldier answerable for all crimes and all charges without any
presentment. The Constitution declares that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due
process of law. This bill sets aside all process of law, and makes the citizen answerable in his person and
property to the will of one man, and as to his life to the will of two. Finally, the Constitution declares that the
privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended unless when, in case of rebellion or invasion, the
public safety may require it; whereas this bill declares martial law (which of itself suspends this great writ) in
time of peace, and authorizes the military to make the arrest, and gives to the prisoner only one privilege, and
that is trial without unnecessary delay. He has no hope of release from custody, except the hope, such as it is, of
release by acquittal before a military commission."
"The United States are bound to guarantee to each State a republican form of government. Can it be pretended
that this obligation is not palpably broken if we carry out a measure like this, which wipes away every vestige of
republican government in ten States and puts the life, property, and honor of all people in each of them under
domination of a single person clothed with unlimited authority?"
"....,here is a bill of attainder against 9,000,000 people at once. It is based upon an accusation so vague as to be
scarcely intelligible and found to be true upon no credible evidence. Not one of the 9,000,000 was heard in his
own defense. The representatives of the doomed parties were excluded from all participation in the trial. The
conviction is to be followed by the most ignominious punishment ever inflicted on large messes of men. It
disfranchises them by hundreds of thousands and degrades them all, even those who are admitted to be guiltless,
from the rank of freeman to the condition of slaves."
Veto Message of President Johnson, March 2, 1867, Footnote

OVERSIGHT OF THE CONQUEST WAS TURNED OVER TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

"If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of government, it will now belong to the
Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice. It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the
Army. He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion
of the administration of military law which relates to military justice." Congressman Lawrence
"In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the states of the union, their
right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional
questions, will be limited."
Congressman Lawrence

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

8 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

"...The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and
regulations for the government....
21 captures
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

"...The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the
Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he
may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3 rd, 1859, as
provides that money drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by
such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed....

28

2005 2008

"...The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior
over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States,
shall be exercised by the Attorney General...."
H.R. 1328
"THE RECONSTRUCTION ACTS"
"1. The powers and duties of the military commanders in the districts constituted by the act of March 2, 1867, "to
provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," considered and determined."
"2. The jurisdiction of military commissions under that act defined."
"3. Summary of the points considered and determined in the former opinion of the Attorney General on this
subject."
Attorney Generals Office, June 12, 1867
"Sir: On the 24th ultimo, I had the honor to transmit for your consideration my opinion upon some of the
questions arising under the reconstruction acts therein referred to. I now proceed to give my opinion on the
remaining questions upon which the military commanders require instructions.
1, As to the powers and duties of these commanders. The original act recites in its preamble, that "no legal State
governments or adequate protection for life or property exist" in those ten States, and that "it is necessary that
each and good order should be enforced" in those States "until loyal and republican State governments can be
legally established.".... "....The 5th section declares the qualification of voters in all elections, as well to frame the
new constitution for each State, as in the elections to be held under the provisional government, until the new
State constitution is ratified by Congress, and also fixes the qualifications of the delegates to frame the new
constitution.
The 6th section provides, "That until the people of said rebel States shall be by law admitted to representation in
the Congress of the United States, any civil governments which may exist therein shall be deemed provisional
only, and in all respects subject to the paramount authority of the United States at any time to abolish, modify,
control, or supersede the same; and in all elections to any office under such provisional governments all persons
shall be entitled to vote, and none others, who are entitled to vote under the provisions of the 5 th section of this
act; and no person shall be eligible to any office under any such provisional governments who would not be
disqualified from holding office under the provisions of the third article of said constitutional amendment."
"....It appears that some of the military commanders have understood this grant of power as all comprehensive,
conferring on them the power to remove the executive and judicial officers of the State, and to appoint other
officers in their places; to suspend the legislative power of the State; to take under their control, by officers
appointed by themselves, the collection and disbursement of the revenues of the State; to prohibit the execution
of the laws in matters affecting purely civil and private rights; to suspend or enjoin the execution of the
judgments and decrees of the established State courts; to interfere in the ordinary administration of justice in the
State courts, by prescribing new qualifications for jurors, and to change, upon the ground of expedience, the
existing relations of the parties to contracts, giving protection to one party by violating the rights of the other
party...."
Reconstruction Acts, Attorney Generals Office, June 12, 1867

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ON THE CONQUEST

"If these Southern States are conquered provinces, then by the laws of nations we are responsible for all the debts
and liabilities of the Conquered country. I ask gentleman to pause before we take so great a responsibility as this
upon us."

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

9 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

Congressman Ross, January 26, 1867

21"Republican
captures in form!--governments formed by the Chief Executive without authority of law and upheld by the
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28
2005 2008

military power when deemed proper, and set aside at the suggestion of post commanders of military districts
these State governments, conceived in ignorance, brought forth in confusion, and rocked in the cradle of
treason, are to be palmed upon the country as legitimate, and taken into the sisterhood of States as republican in
form, with all the rights belonging to great States of the Union."
Congressman Cullom, January 28, 1867

"Mr. Chairman, the time has come when every patriotic citizen of this country should be aroused to the danger
which hangs like a thick pall over our institutions. The time has come when the question must be decided
whether the people of this country have any longer any rights that deserve to be respected. The glory of the
fathers was that we had a Government resting so lightly on the shoulders of the people that they hardly knew
they were taxed. The idea on which our Government was founded was that we were to dispense with all the
traditionary notions of monarchy and aristocracy; that among the other abuses of monarchical government from
which we were to be exempt were standing armies and navies, needlessly eating out the substance of the people.
But, sir, this old doctrine is being entirely reversed; we have been placed under military despotism; a permanent
military establishment has been created; provision is made for putting one third of the people of this Union under
military law; and we are having pressed upon us in this House a militia bill providing for the military enrollment
of the entire community.
Mr. Chairman, these are important moments in the history of our country, and I call upon patriotic Union-loving
men who revere and venerate the institutions under which we live to come to the rescue. There is no time to be
lost; ere long the chins will be around our necks; there is great danger in permitting this thing to go on. I call
upon the honorable and distinguished gentlemen on the other side to come to the help of our imperiled free
Government." Congressman Ross, February 19, 1867
"Nearly two years ago the armies of a government calling itself the confederate States of America were
conquered and the government was dispersed. By the law of nations the conqueror after that had a right to say
exactly what government should be administered over them or by them, keeping always within the law of
nations. The conqueror had a right either to extend his own laws over those conquered States, or if no action was
taken by the conqueror, then by the law of nations the old institutions were permitted to run on for the purpose of
administering the local laws until such time as the conquering party should act......This bill provides the ten
disorganized States shall be divided into five military districts, and that the commander of the Army shall take
charge of them through his lieutenants as governors, or you may call them commandants if you choose, not
below the grade of brigadiers, who shall have the general supervision of the peace, quite, and the protection of
the people, loyal and disloyal, who reside within those precincts; and that do so he may use, as the law of nations
would authorize him to do, the legal tribunals wherever he may deem them competent; but they are to be
considered of no validity per se, of no intrinsic force, no force in consequence of their origin, the question being
wholly within the power of the conqueror, and to remain until that conqueror shall permanently supply their
place with something else."
Congressman Stevens from Pennsylvania, February 7, 1867.
"I feel, sir, that the passage of this bill is the death-knell of civil liberty, not only here but everywhere. Sad as the
thought may be it is too true that almost the last hope of a once free people, that liberty is secure here, is fast
passing away.
The bill under consideration proposes to establish nothing more and nothing less than a military despotism....
The provisions of this bill strike down every important provision in your Constitution. You have already
inaugurated enough here to destroy any Government that was ever founded....When you do that there is nothing
left, I repeat, but quiet submission to your tyranny, or a resort to arms on the part of the American People to
defend themselves....We are drifting to monarchy. It will come unless the people take this matter in hand and
stop this progress that is being made in the downward road, and restore this shattered Government upon the basis
upon which it was originally founded."
Congressman Le Blond, February 7, 1867
"Will it aid the cause of democratic Government to exhibit this great Republicthis model, as we have sought to
make it, of what every republic should beabandoning all the functions of civil government, abrogating every
thing like civil authority over one third of our domain and one third of our people, and for very imbecility and
inability to agree upon any measure handing over the control of this section and these people to the absolute and
sovereign will of a brigadier general in the regular Army? Will that aid the cause of free republican government
anywhere on the face of the earth? It is the last resort of a decayed and dying republic. If we have no better
resource than this, we may as well do at once what this would seem to be a preliminary step for doing: invite the

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

10 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

regular Army to take control of the whole country, install itself here in the capital as the central, sovereign
power, and make such laws and issue such decrees as it may see fit."

28

21 captures
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

Congressman Raymond, February 8, 1867

2005 2008

"Now, I again call on gentlemen who deny that the Union has been dissolved, for I suppose this military bill is to
pass if any does, to pause before they take this last and final step. What does this bill do? It proclaims the Union
dissolved; it declares that ten States are out of the Union; and if ten States are out
all are out; the Constitution holds and binds all together or it holds none. It proclaims that the Union is dissolved;
that the experiment of mans capacity for self-government is a failure....And yet gentlemen are disposed to rush
madly upon the passage of a bill declaring in substance that the Union is dissolved, establishing an absolute
military despotism over ten States with a population of eight or ten million people, giving to the military
commander unlimited and absolute power over life, liberty, property, and all things else." Congressman Harding,
February 12, 1867
"As the gentleman from Pennsylvania is now in his seat I will repeat a remark which I made a short time ago
when he was absent. I said that he was the first to make the startling announcement here in this House a few
years ago, "That all compacts between the North and South were abrogated, and that the laws of nations and of
war thenceforward controlled the destinies of each party in the conflict then pending."
Congressman Harding, February 12, 1867
"It is true, undoubtedly true, that these States remained disorganized States in the Union. It is also undoubtedly
true that those who were the conquerors upon the field of battle reduced those in rebellion to subjects."
Congressman Eldridge, February 7, 1867
"The following bureaus shall be established in this department [The Department of Justice]: a Bureau of
International Law, a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Navel Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a
Bureau of Land Management Law."
Congressional Globe, concerning H.R. 1328
"This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the
cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and cognizance of all subjects of military and navel law, except that
portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the
supervision of records." Congressman Lawrence
"Now look at what has been done. That very party obtained control of the Government. There has been war; that
war is over, but the Union is not restored, and at this very moment the public debt, mountain high, is casting its
deadly and blighting shadow of bankruptcy over the whole country. We are literally bankrupts to day; and
generations to come must be ground to the earth under the crushing weight of this monstrous debt."
Congressman Harding,
February 12, 1867
"Sec. 13. Be it further enacted, That all laws now in force in Louisiana, consistent with the Constitution and laws
of the United States and with the provisions of this act, shall remain in force until repealed or modified: Provide,
That no person shall be competent to act as a juror who is not an elector under the provisions of this act: And
provided also, That all the expenses of and incident to the administration of the provisional governments herein
provided for shall be collected and paid as is now done for the support of the present government of Louisiana."
Reported by Congressman Elliot, February 11, 1867
"Yes, say gentlemen upon that side of the House, "but the President of the United States has the appointing of the
military officers who are to control the people of those States." Sir, that may be a matter of some consequence in
the minds of gentlemen upon that side of the House; but to me it is a matter of no consequence who is to be the
man that is to establish military despotism in any State within this Union or to establish a power that is to absorb
all other powers.
Whoever appoints these officers lays the foundation for a military despotism that must destroy our Government,
and I envy not the man who is to exercise the powers attempted to be granted by this bill.
Mr. Speaker, this bill is to pass Congress. All the powers of the Union men of this House cannot obstruct its
passage. The die is cast, and the subversion of constitutional liberty willed by the usurpers.

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

11 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

In conclusion, let me warn gentlemen that there is a point beyond which forbearance ceases to be a virtue and
where hope no longer restrains the action of men. That point is at hand or near by.

28

21 captures
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

2005 2008

Conclude your works of destruction by impeaching the Executive and you have lopped off one arm of the
Government. Circumscribe the judiciary by your network of laws and you have paralyzed one of its main
branches; but to dismember this Union, either by armed force or usurped legislative power, is the destruction of
constitutional liberty, and to establish military despotism over all of the States of this Union that will justify the
friends of liberty to a resort to arms."
Congressman Le Blond, February 18, 1867

"I shall content myself with denouncing this measure as most wicked and abominable. It contains all that is
vicious, all that is mischievous in any and all of the propositions which have come either from the Committee on
Reconstruction or from any gentleman upon the other side of the House. I am not quite so certain as my friend
from Ohio [Mr. Le Blond] that when this bill shall have become a law, should it ever become the law, a state of
war will not exist. In my judgement, this bill is of itself a declaration of war against the southern people; it is at
least a revival and continuation of the war, which we had hoped was forever ended. If it is bello cessante now
from the time this bill shall pass and become a law, it will be a war actual and flagrant which will I fear involve
that whole people, white and black, in one common ruin.
Now, what is this measure? I do not wonder that there is some difference of opinion upon the other side of the
House. I should wonder if there was not. For as you approach the final consummation of the purpose which you
have had in view of virtually declaring the Government of our fathers a failure, I wonder not that you differ; that
you have some controversy among yourselves, some misgivings....
It was well said by my friend from Ohio [Mr. Le Blond] that this bill starts out with a falsehood. It does, indeed.
It declares that there are no legal governments in these States. It not only starts out with a lie, but every provision
of the bill is a lie; it is one consummate, unmitigated lie from beginning to end. It will, if it shall become a law,
subject the people of ten States of this Union to the unwritten, undefined, and undefinable will of a brigadier
general of the Army. It will substitute for our written Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof the
arbitrary, uncontrolled, and unlimited will of a military despot. It matters not who he may be; how pure, how
upright; I care not if he be the Commander-in-Chief of the Army, he will be, he can be nothing less, than a
military despot. Gentlemen may sugar-coat the pill if they can on that side or this side of the House by saying
that it is all to be under the control of the President of the United States; I honor him in his position and office,
and for many things he has done; but, sir, God never made the man or the angel whom I would trust with the
liberties of the people unlimited and unrestrained by a written constitution....
But the effect of this bill is to abrogate the Constitution of the United States, to overthrow all government and
commit all the rights, all the vast interests of the people of those States subject to the supreme will and pleasure
of a military despot."
Congressman Eldridge, February 18, 1867
"The terms of this bill are fearful to contemplate as a permanent system. If the South must be permanently
governed by this bill there is an end of republican government, for there is no republican government in this
bill." Congressman Stewart,
February 15, 1867
"....The principle upon which the bill proceeds is the principle for which I have all along contended, that the
rebel States, as communities, have been conquered by the arms of the United States in the prosecution of the war
which resulted in the suppression of the rebellion waged by those States. I hold that, subject to the Constitution
of the United States and to the duty of ultimately restoring the rebel States to their former standing under the
Constitution, the Government of the United States has the same power in reference to those conquered
communities as it would have had they been foreign territory.
Let me not be misunderstood, sir. I do not say that the Government of the United States has precisely the same
authority over the rebel States which it would have in reference to conquered foreign territory; but we hold them
by the sword and by the right of conquest; yet we hold them in a fiduciary capacity, and the trust imposed upon
the Government is ultimately and in our good time, as Congress shall judge most fit and expedient in reference
to the public interest, to restore them to the enjoyment of all their former rights as members of the Union. But at
present we hold them as conquered country. The governments which have been established there under the
imperial edicts of the Executive have all depended for their vitality and force upon the military power of the
United States; and it cannot be denied to-day that all these bogus governments in the rebel StatesI call them
bogus only in the sense of their being unconstitutionalrest upon the military edicts of the President of the
United States, so far as they have any foundation and operation...." Congressman Howard, February 15, 1867

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

12 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

"....I suppose we have the constitutional right and constitutional power to treat these States as conquered

28

21provinces.
captures I do not doubt that, because I believe we have the power to do about as we please with them. I believe
2005 2008

3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

when they fell into our hands we were controlled by no law except the general laws of humanity and the laws of
war and of nations with regard to them." Congressman Stewart, February 15, 1867

"Now, allow me to remind my honorable friend from Nevada that since these insurrectionary States were
subdued and overthrown the military power in that region of the country has been absolute, and we have sat here
since 1865 and witnessed the military acts of the President of the United States unlimited and absolute over the
whole country. We have seen him set aside States and State institutions and govern that entire country by his
absolute military authority. Nobody denies that...." Congressman Morrill, February 15, 1867
"I am for invoking that law no longer than it is necessary, for exercising it only within the limits of the necessity.
Enacted into a system of permanent laws, with no limit to the duration of such a system, and it does look, and the
world will believe, that this struggle is for military despotism as an end, and not for military rule as a means for
the preservation of free institutions....Show me an instance where any one who had such power ever relinquished
it. It is according to all history and the nature of man that those who have power hold on to it as long as they
can...." Congressman Stewart, February 15, 1867
"....Mr. Henderson, Do I understand the Senator from Michigan to say that General Grant is superior in his orders
to the President of the United States
Mr. Howard. No, sir; I have not said so.

Mr. Henderson. Can he be so made by law?

Mr. Howard. Does the Senator wish me to answer that question
Mr. Henderson. I do , because I am seeking light.
Mr. Howard. I have no doubt that it is within the competency
of Congress, under the Constitution, in the form of a law, to impose any duty it may see fit upon any military
officer by name or by rank, and that it is not in the competency of the President, after the passage of such a law,
to thwart its execution or interfere with its execution in any way.
Mr. Henderson. What becomes of the constitutional provision which declares that the President of the United
States shall be the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy?
Mr. Howard. That is a mere rank conferred upon the President...." Congressman Henderson and Howard,
February 15, 1867
"....While I question not the sincerity of other men I shall give utterance to what I feel, to what I think, and, if I
have the power, to all that abhorrence which I feel for this proposition, which, of itself, if it be carried out, is the
death-knell of the Republic." Congressman Doolittle, February 15, 1867
"....The passage of this bill, if it shall become an act either by the signature of the President or by the vote of
Congress over a veto, is in my judgement, as we heard this afternoon, the death-knell, not only of the Republic,
but of civil and constitutional liberty in this country." Congressman Saulsbury, February 15, 1867
"....What, sir, are we doing? I shall not now enter into a discussion of this question, though I intend to do so
before the bill is finally passed; but what do we hear here? The agent reconstruction the principal! What is the
Federal Government? A mere agent created by the States of this Union with no particle of original inherent
sovereignty about it. And that Federal Government, established by a written Constitution defining its powers, a
Government simply of delegated powers, not assumes in the face of the people of this country, and in the eyes of
the world, to undertake to reconstruct its creator! How did the
Federal Government have an existence? It was because the people of the thirteen original States, acting
separately for themselves, chose to establish this Federal Government with certain specified and limited powers.
And I cannot bring myself to the conclusion that, in the lines of the history of the formation of the Constitution,
in defiance of al the teachings of the fathers, and in contravention of every principle of adjudicated constitutional
law, any court will ever hold this bill to be constitutional or worth the paper that it is written on; and let it not be
supposed that outraged rights will not seek the peaceable redress of the courts of law to test the constitutionality
of this measure...." Congressman Saulsbury,
February 15, 1867

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

13 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

"....If the court know, as I am sure they do, what is due to their dignity, they will refuse to hold their courts at all
where such doctrines are enforced. The present Chief Justice of the United States declared it to be his
21determination,
captures
and I applauded him for it, that he would hold no court in a State in which martial law prevailed
2005 2008
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10
and the writ of habeas corpus was denied...." Congressman Johnson, February 15, 1867

28

"....Congress has too often since those ordinances were adopted recognized them as States to allow the majority
now to deny their existence as States. When did they cease to be States and come to be pretended governments? I
should like to hear some gentleman of this majority state exactly at what time that took
place, when it was, and how it was. State governments were in existence when the rebellion took place. Did the
rebellion disrobe them as States? Too often we said that was not the case to allow the contrary to be said now.
Did they cease to be States by the act of secession, by the act of rebellion, by the act of war, or was it because the
rebellion itself was defeated?...." Congressman Hendricks, February 15, 1867
ALLODIAL PROPERTY VS. TENET ON THE LAND
16 USC Sec. 831x
TITLE 16
CHAPTER 12A
Sec. 831x. Condemnation proceedings; institution by
Corporation; venue
STATUTE"The Corporation may cause proceedings to be instituted for the acquisition by condemnation of any lands,
easements, or rights-of-way which, in the opinion of the Corporation, are necessary to carry out the provisions of
this chapter. The proceedings shall be instituted in the United States district court for the district in which the
land, easement, right-of-way, or other interest, or any part thereof, is located, and such court shall have full
jurisdiction to divest the complete title to the property sought to be acquired out of all persons or claimants and
vest the same in the United States in fee simple, and to enter a decree quieting the title thereto in the United
States of America."
"The fiefs were built in the same manner as a pyramid, with the King, the true owner of the land, being at the
top, and from the bottom up there existed a system of small to medium sized to large to large sized estates on
which the persons directly beneath one estate owed homage to the lord of that estate as well as to the King." Id.
at 114, Allodial And Land
Patents Titles
"At the lowest level of this pyramid through at least the 14th and 15th centuries existed to serfs or villains, the
class of people that had no rights and were recognized as nothing more than real property." F.Goodwin, Treatise
on The Law of Real Property, Ch. 1, p. 10 (1905), Allodial And Land Patents
Titles
"Under this type of fief a certain portion of the grain harvested each year would immediately be turned over to
the lord above that particular fief even before the shares from the lower lords and then serfs of the fief would be
distributed. A more interesting type of fief for purposes of this memorandum [3] was the money fief. In most
cases, the source of money was not specified, and the payment was simply made from the fief holders treasury,
but the fief might also consist of a fixed revenue to be paid from a definite source in annual payments in order
for the tenant owner of the fief to be able to remain on the property." Gilsebert of Mons, Chronique, cc. 69 and 1
15, pp. 109, 175 (ed.
Vanderkindere), Allodial And Land Patents Titles
"142. (1) Fee-simple estatesTenant in fee simple (or, as he is frequently styled, tenant in fee) is he that hath
lands, tenements, or hereditaments, to hold to him and his heirs forever; generally, absolutely, and simply;
without mentioning what heirs, but referring that to his own pleasure, or to the dispostition of the law. The true
meaning of the word "fee" (feodum) is the same with that of feud or fief, and in its original sense it is taken in
contradistinction to allodium; which latter the writers on this subject define to be every mans own land, which
he possesseth merely in his own right, without owing any rent or service to any superior." 2 Blackstones
Commentary, page 105

12/5/2015 3:13 PM

Against the Grain Press - Knowledge is Freedom

14 of 14

http://web.archive.org/web/20080828063431/http://www.atgpress.com/k...

"Thus, the term fee simple absolute in Common-Law England denotes the most and best title a person could
have as long as the King allowed him to retain possession of (own) the land. It has been commented that the
21basis
captures
of English land law is the owners
3 May 02 - 13 Jul 10

28
2005 2008

The original and true meaning of the word "fee" and therefore fee simple absolute is the same as fief or feud, this
being in contradiction to the term "allodium" which means or is defined as a mans own land, which he possesses
merely in his own right, without owing any rent or service to any superior." Wendell [4] v Crandall, 1 N. Y. 491
(1848), Allodial And Land Patents Titles
"Therefore on Common-Law England practically everybody who was allowed to retain land, had the type of fee
simple absolute often used or defined by courts, a fee simple that grants or gives the occupier as much of a title
as the "sovereign" allows such occupier to have at that time. The term became a synonym with the supposed
ownership of land under the feudal system of England at common law. Thus, even though the word absolute was
attached to the fee simple, it merely denoted the entire estate that could be assigned or passed to heirs, and the
fee being the operative word; fee simple absolute dealt with the entire fief and its divisibility, alienability and
inheritability." Friedman v Steiner, 107 111. 131 (1883), Allodial And Land Patents Titles
"If a fee simple absolute in Common-Law England denoted or was synonymous with only as much title as the
King allowed his barons to possess, then what did the King have by way of a title?
The King of England held ownership of land under a different title and with far greater powers than any of his
subjects. Though the people of England held fee simple titles to their land, the King actually owned all the land
in England through his allodial title, and though all the land was in the feudal system, none of the fee simple
titles were of equal weight and dignity with the Kings title, the land always remaining allodial in favor of the
King." Gilsbert of Mons, Chronique, Ch. 43, p. 75 (ed. Vanderkindere), Allodial And Land
Patents Titles
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of
government, i.e., law, amounting to a mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the
necessities of the State." Senate Document No. 43, "Contracts payable in Gold" written in 1933. As far as the
ladder goes, based on the current law, the public policy of the conqueror, we are on the bottom rung. Land
ownership is a misnomer, there are only tenets on the land.

12/5/2015 3:13 PM