Denver Seminary > Articles > The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple

Seite 1

D E NVE R S E MINAR Y

The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple

Richard Bauckham
Dec 1, 2007
Series: Volume 11 - 2008

Richard Bauckham, The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple: Narrative, History, and Theology in the Gospel of
John. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007. $29.99. 313 pp. ISBN 978-0-8010-3485-5.
Many collections of a biblical scholar's previously published articles on a topic seem not to merit yet one more
book in an already glutted industry. No one can fairly accuse this volume of falling into that category. Richard
Bauckham, recently retired from the University of St. Andrews, has a distinguished career as a prolific writer
on an amazing array of topics, arguably none of them more important than his works on the Gospel of John.
Although all of the offerings of this volume are reprints or revisions of essays that have appeared elsewhere
(one is a reworking of a section from a recent book of Bauckham's), many were tucked away in little-known
sources and all deserve the wider audience and context that their presentation in this volume will afford.
The opening study reviews Bauckham's case for John the elder (not the apostle) of Papias' testimony as the
beloved disciple and eyewitness to the events of the Gospel. Particularly important is that he is never named,
whereas the sons of Zebedee appear in 21:2 as distinct characters from the BD. Following logically from this
study is Bauckham's work on the BD as ideal author, to be distinguished from those who have viewed him as
ideal disciple. He witnesses to Jesus, even if his potential avoidance of martyrdom proves uncharacteristic.
"Historiographical Characteristics of the Gospel of John" present elements that link this document more with
history than biography, or at least more so than in the Synoptics. These include accurate details of topography
and chronology and the use of eyewitness testimony and numerous speeches or dialogues. None of this makes
the Gospel necessarily accurate in all it presents but it leaves the door open for such a conclusion given the
literary genre that results from this study. "The Audience of the Gospel of John" demonstrates how poorly J. L.
Martyn's influential approach of a two-level reading of the narrative (a few things truly from Jesus' life but
most transparent of end of first-century realities) actually works. The excommunication passages may not
reflect any empire wide birkath-ha-minim, numerous characters do not obviously stand for anyone in John's
community or its opposition, and Patristic use regularly viewed John's audience as the broadest, not the most
sectarian.
A comparison of the dualism in the Dead Sea Scrolls, especially with respect to light and darkness, shows that
the parallels with John are not as close as sometimes maintained. Scholars were right to swing the pendulum
away from Greco-Roman backgrounds to Jewish ones for this and related phenomena, but the case for doing
so can be made even better by looking simply at Old Testament parallels. Rabbinic literature and Josephus
refer to at least two powerful, wealthy Jewish leaders by the name of Nicodemus in the elite Gurion family.
Probably neither matches the one in John, but given the frequent practice of reusing family names and the
rarity of this particular name outside of this family, everything in the Fourth Gospel about Nicodemus bespeaks
verisimilitude.
Lazarus, Mary and Martha, on the other hand, were extremely common Jewish names. So the appearance of
the resurrected Lazarus in John 11 need not require hypotheses of borrowing from the parable of Luke 16:19-

http://www.denverseminary.edu/article/the-testimony-of-the-beloved-disciple

07.01.2008 14:03:36

Denver Seminary > Articles > The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple

Seite 2

31. After all, no resurrection is requested there, only a temporary apparition from the realm of the dead. On
the other hand the portraits of the two sisters do show the right combination of similarities and differences
between Luke 10:38-42 and John 11-12 to suggest that John may well be providing historically accurate
portraits without simply borrowing from Luke. Similar logic supports the authenticity of the footwashing scene
in John 13-coherence with the Synoptic servant logia without close enough parallelism to suggest dependence
at any point.
In a study of Jewish Messianism in the Fourth Gospel, Bauckham shows how the various portraits of Jesus as
Christ, prophet like Moses, and Son of man all reflect the right balance of coherence with Jewish backgrounds
and fit with Jesus' progressive self-revelation as to be credible in the contexts to which John ascribes them. In
his focus on monotheism and Christology in this Gospel, Bauckham shows how Jesus' oneness with the Father,
the I-am sayings and other examples of his exercise of divine prerogatives are never phrased so as to suggest
a compromise with monotheism. Indeed, the relevant Old Testament backgrounds show that what is
predicated of Jesus is exactly that his relationship with the Father "is integral to who the one God is" (p. 252).
The holiness of Jesus in the Fourth Gospel is to be mirrored in the holiness of the disciples, except that it is not
absolute for them and (thus) they do not atone for the sins of the world, as Christ did. But it separates them
from the world so that they can be his message-bearers to the world. The mysterious number 153 for the
amount of fish caught in John 21:11 should be understood as highly symbolic, given the prevalence of Jewish
gematria in John's day. In addition to endorsing certain previous suggestions, Bauckham observes that the
numerical equivalents of the Greek of the four key words in the first "ending" of the Gospel in John 20:30-31
for "sign," "believe," "Christ" and "life" are 17, 98, 19 and 36, respectively. 153 is the "triangle" number of 17
(the sum of the numbers 1 through 17, and the sum of 98, 19 and 36 also is 153. Whatever else all this
implies, it certainly suggests the same person behind chapter 21 as wrote the rest of the Gospel!
A short review can scarcely evaluate each of these contributions in any detail. One wonders if Bauckham's
John the elder, who so closely resembles the son of Zebedee in profile, would have been quite so readily
recognized as distinct from him, especially since the only character named John in the Fourth Gospel is the
Baptist, but he is never given this epithet. Would anyone other than John, son of Zebedee, have been able to
do this without fear of ambiguity, especially once the Gospel did circulate widely beyond its initial Ephesian
addressees, as Bauckham stresses it did? Must we choose between Bauckham and Larry Hurtado, for
example, who stresses the partial antecedent variegated monotheism in various strands of Judaism bordering
on binitarianism? Despite the remarkable coincidences of numerical sums, do we have any controls on such
gematrial speculation to give us any confidence John actually intended this?
But these are minor quibbles. Overall, this is an extraordinary meticulous, creative, even ground-breaking
collection of essays, each of which merits careful study, and almost all of which deserve widespread
acceptance. Buy this book, marvel at it and digest it. May Bauckham be as enlightened and lucid in his
retirement as he has been during his illustrious career!
Craig L. Blomberg, Ph.D.
Distinguished Professor of New Testament
Denver Seminary
December 2007
6399 South Santa Fe Drive, Littleton, CO, USA 80120
800-922-3040 | info@denverseminary.edu
Copyright Denver Seminary. | Privacy Policy (/about-us/seminary-policies/privacy-policy/)
Powered by Ekklesia 360 (http://www.ekklesia360.com/)

http://www.denverseminary.edu/article/the-testimony-of-the-beloved-disciple

07.01.2008 14:03:36