Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MB0027
SET 1
Earlier researchers had concluded the short-term improvement was caused by teamwork
when workers saw themselves as part of a study group or team. Others have broadened the
definition to mean that people's behavior and performance change following any new or
increased attention. Hence, the term Hawthorne effect no longer has a specific definition
The term Hawthorne effect has been linked with numerous other terms, including:
Epistemic feedback, systemic bias, implicit social cognition, and continuous improvement.
Some more definitions of the Hawthorne effect, showing how differently it can be defined:
An experimental effect in the direction expected but not for the reason
expected; i.e., a significant positive effect that turns out to have no causal basis in the
theoretical motivation for the intervention, but is apparently due to the effect on the
participants of knowing themselves to be studied in connection with the outcomes
measured.
The Hawthorne Effect is the confounding that occurs if experimenters fail to realize
how the consequences of subjects' performance affect what subjects do
People singled out for a study of any kind may improve their performance or behavior,
not because of any specific condition being tested, but simply because of all the
attention they receive
People will respond positively to any novel change in work environment
In the light of the various critiques, we can see the Hawthorne effect at several levels:
At the top level, it seems clear that in some cases there is a large effect that experimenters
did not anticipate, that is due to participants' reactions to the experiment itself.
At a middle level the most important (though not the only) aspect of this is how the
participants interpret the situation. Interviewing them
(after the "experiment" part) would be the way to investigate this.
This is important because factory workers, students, and most experimental
participants are doing things at the request of the experimenter.
At the lowest level is the question of what the direct causal factors might be.
2 .Trace the growth of Trade Union Movement from Factories Act 1881 to Factories
Act 1948.
Ans.
Trade unions are unique organisations whose role is variously interpreted and understood
by different interest groups in the society. Traditionally trade unions role has been to
protect jobs and real earnings, secure better conditions of work and life and fight against
exploitation and arbitrariness to ensure fairness and equity in employment contexts. In the
wake of a long history of union movement and accumulated benefits under collective
agreements, a plethora of legislations and industrial jurisprudence, growing literacy and
awareness among the employees and the spread of a variety of social institutions including
consumer and public interest groups the protective role must have undergone, a qualitative
change. It can be said that the protective role of trade unions remains in form, but varies in
substance.
There is a considerable debate on the purposes and role of trade unions. The predominant
view, however, is that the concerns of trade unions extend beyond 'bread and butter'
issues. Trade unions through industrial action (such as protests and strikes) and political
action (influencing Government policy) establish minimum economic and legal conditions
and restrain abuse of labour wherever the labour is organised. Trade unions are also seen
as moral institutions, which will uplift the weak and downtrodden and render them the
place, the dignity and justice they deserve.
Growth of Indian trade union movement can be divided into three phases:
The first phase falls between 1850 and 1900 during which the inception of trade unions
took place. During this period of the growth of Indian Capitalist enterprises, the working and
living conditions of the labour were poor and their working hours were long. Capitalists were
only interested in their productivity and profitability. In addition to long working hours, their
wages were low and general economic conditions were poor in industries. In order to
regulate the working hours and other service conditions of the
Indian textile labourers, the Indian Factories Act was enacted in 1881. As a result,
employment of child labour was prohibited. Mr. N M Lokhande organized people like
rickshawalas etc., prepared a study report on their working conditions and submitted it to
the Factory Labour Commission. The Indian Factory Act of 1881 was amended in 1891 due
to his efforts. Guided by educated philanthropists and social workers like Mr.Lokhande, the
growth of trade union movement was slow in this phase. Many strikes took place in the two
decades following 1880 in all industrial cities. These strikes taught
workers to understand the power of united action even though there was no union in real
terms. Small associations like Bombay Mill-Hands Association came up.
The second phase of The Indian trade union movement falls between 1900 and 1947.This
phase was characterized by the development of organized trade unions and political
movements of the working class. It also witnessed the emergence of militant trade
unionism. The First World War (1914-1918) and the Russian revolution of 1917 gave a new
turn to the Indian trade union movement and organized efforts on part of the workers to
form trade unions. In 1918, B P Wadia organized trade union movements with Textile mills
in Madras. He served strike notice to them and workers appealed to Madras High Court
because under ‘Common Law’, strike is a breach of law. In 1919, Mahatma Gandhi
suggested to let individual struggle be a Mass movement. In 1920, the First National Trade
union organization (The All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC)) was established. Many of
the leaders of this organization were leaders of the national Movement. In 1926, Trade
union law came up with the efforts of Mr. N N Joshi that became operative from 1927.
The third phase began with the emergence of independent India (in 1947), and the
Government sought the cooperation of the unions for planned economic development. The
working class movement was also politicized along the lines of political parties. For instance
Indian national trade Union Congress (INTUC) is the trade union arm of the Congress Party.
The AITUC is the trade union arm of the Communist Party of India. Besides workers, white-
collar employees, supervisors and managers are also organized
by the trade unions, as for example in the Banking, Insurance and Petroleum industries.
• According to the Factory Act of 1881, the workers employed in the factories were
allowed a week-off and provisions were also made for inspection as well as limiting
the hours of work for women workers to eleven per day.
• In 1890, the first labour organization designated as Bombay Mill Hands
Association were established. Subsequently,
• in 1905, the printer's union at Calcutta and
• in 1907, the Postal Union at Bombay were established.
• In 1981,the Madras Labour Union
• In 1922, the Indentured Labour System and Central Labour Board and All Trade
Union Congress
• In 1926, the Indian Trade Union Act( a landmark in history of industrial relations)
• During Second World War, rapid growth in Trade Unionism
• Between 1939-40 and 1944-45 the no of registered trade unions increased from
666 to 865
• After second world war especially after the independence large scale of expansion
of the trade union movement
• During 1947-1960, employment rose by 2.8 times
• During 1960, 45 percent of the total industrial workforce was claimed to be
unionized
• Explicitly, during post-independence period, the activities of Personnel
Department in different public and private sectors have multiplied
• According to the provisions of section 49 of the Factories Act 1948,it become
obligatory for the-employers to employee a Welfare Officer in a factory employing
500 or more workers
3. Elaborate the HR planning System
Ans.
Ans.
Multiple person Evaluation techniques are used for evaluating one employee in
comparison to another. Three such frequently used methods in organization are – ranking,
paired comparison and forced distribution.
Ranking method
This is a relatively easy method of performance evaluation. Under this method, the ranking
of an employee in a work group is done against that of another employee. The relative
position of each employee is tested in terms of his numerical rank. It may also be done by
ranking a person on his job performance against another member of the competitive group.
The quintessence of this method is that employees are ranked according to their levels of
performance. While using this method, the evaluator is asked to rate employees from
highest to lowest on some overall criterion. Though it is relatively easier to rank the best
and the worst employees, it is very difficult to rank the average employees. Generally,
evaluators pick the top and bottom employees first and then select the next highest and
next lowest and move towards the average (middle) employees. The longstanding
limitations of this method are:
The ‘whole man’ is compared with another ‘whole man’ in this method. In practice, it
is very difficult to compare individuals possessing varied behavioral traits.
This method speaks only of the position where an employee stands in his group. It
does not tell anything about how much better or how much worse an employee is
when compared to another employee.
When a large number of employees are working, ranking of individuals becomes a
toxicating issue.
There is no systematic procedure for ranking individuals in the organization. The
ranking system does not eliminate the possibility of snap judgments.
Ranking becomes more reliable and easier under the paired comparison method. Each
worker is compared with all other employees in the group; for every trait the worker is
compared with all other employees.
For several individual traits, paired comparisons are made, tabulated and then rank is
assigned to each worker. Though this method seems to be logical, it is not applicable when
a group is large. When the group becomes too large, the number of comparisons to be
made may become frighteningly excessive.
Under this system, the rater is asked to appraise the employee according to a
predetermined distribution scale. The rater’s bias is sought to be eliminated here because
workers are not placed at a higher or lower end of the scale. Normally, the two criteria used
here for rating are the job performance and promotability. Further, a five point performance
scale is used without any mention of descriptive statements. Workers are placed between
the two extremes of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ performances.
One strong positive point in favor of the forced distribution method is that by forcing the
distribution according to predetermined percentages, the problem of making use of different
raters with different scales is avoided. Further, this method is appreciated on the ground
that it tends to eliminate rater bias. The limitation of using this method in salary
administration however, is that it may result in low morale, low productivity and high
absenteeism. Employees who feel that they are productive, but find themselves placed in a
lower grade (than expected) feel frustrated and exhibit, over a period of time, reluctance to
work.
Group appraisal
HRA is a sophisticated way to measure (in financial terms) the effectiveness of personnel
management activities and the use of people in an organization. It is the process of
accounting for people as an organizational resource. It tries to place a value on
organizational human resources as assets and not as expenses. The HRA process shows the
investment the organization makes in its people and how the value of these people changes
over time. In this method, employee performance is evaluated in terms of costs and
contributions of employees. Human resource costs include expenditure incurred by the
company in hiring, training, compensating and developing people. The contributions of
human resources is the money value of labour productivity
This technique has not developed fully and is still in the transitionary stage.
Assessment centre
This method of appraising was first applied in German Army in 1930. Later business and
industrial houses started using this method. This is not a technique of performance
appraisal by itself. In fact it is a system or organization, where assessment of several
individuals is done by various experts using various techniques. These techniques include
the methods discussed before in addition to in-basket, role playing, case studies, simulation
exercises, structured in sight, transactional analysis, etc.
Where subjective performance measures are used, there is scope for biases influencing the
evaluation process. To avoid this, some employees use the field review method. In this
method a trained, skilled representative of the HR department goes into the ‘field’ and
assists line supervisors with their ratings of their respective subordinates. The HR specialist
requests from the immediate supervisor specific information about the employees
performance. Based on this information, the expert prepares a report which is sent to the
supervisor for review, changes, approval and discussion with the employee who is being
rated. The ratings are done on standardized forms.
Subsistence theory: This theory, also known as ‘Iron Law of Wages’, was propounded by
David Ricardo (1772-1823). According to this theory, wages tend to settle at a level just
sufficient to maintain the workers and his family at minimum subsistence levels. The theory
applies only to backward countries where labourers are extremely poor and are unable to
get their share from the employers.
Standard of living theory: This theory is a modified form of subsistence theory. According
to this theory, wages are determined not by subsistence level but also by the standard of
living to which a class of labourers become habituated.
Residual claimant theory: Francis A. Walker(1840-1897) propounded this theory.
According to him, there were four factors of production/ business activity viz., land, labour,
capital and entrepreneurship. Wages represent the amount of value created in the
production which remains after payment has been made for all these factors of production.
In other words, labour is the residual claimant.
The wage fund theory: According to this theory, after rent and raw materials are paid for,
a definite amount remains for labour. The total wage fund and the number of workers
determine the average worker’s share in the form of wages.
Demand and supply theory: According to this theory, wages depend upon the demand
and supply of labour.
Marginal productivity theory: This is an improved form of demand and supply theory.
Wages are determined by the value of the net product of the marginal unit of labour
employed.
Purchasing power theory: According to this theory the prosperity, productivity and
progress of industry depend on there being sufficient demand to ensure the sale of its
products and pocketing of reasonable profits. A large pact of the products of industry is
consumed by workers and their families and if wages are high m demand will be good.
However, if wages and the purchasing power of the workers are low, some of the goods will
remain unsold; output will go down which will result in unemployment.
The bargaining theory of wages: John Davidson propounded this theory. According to
him, wages are determined by the relative bargaining power of workers or trade unions and
of employers, When a trade union is involved, basic wages, fringe benefits, job differentials
and individual differences tend to be determined by the relative strength of the organization
and the trade union.
Professionals who design and implement comprehensive direct and indirect pay programs
are often required to balance conflicting variables. These variables include internal
pressures for cost containment, the financial interests of employees, external competition
for talented employees, executives’ roles in shaping organizational cultures, ethical
considerations, the role of government, and the influence of long-range business plans.
There are four basic methods of job evaluation: ranking method, job
grading method, point method and factor comparison method. Out of these,
first two methods are non-quantitative and also known as traditional, non analytical or
summary methods. The last two methods are quantitative, also known as analytical
methods, and use various quantitative techniques in evaluating a job.
Ranking Method
In the ranking method, a whole job is compared with others and rank is
provided on the basis of this comparison.
Advantages:
Ranking method has certain facial merits. Some of these merits are as
follows:
1. The method is comparatively simple, easily understandable, and mostly
acceptable by labour unions. It is suitable for comparatively smaller
organisations which may not like to undertake more laborious exercises.
2. The method is less costly to undertake and maintain as compared to other
systems.
Limitations:
Since ranking method of job evaluation is qualitative and non-analytical.
it suffers from the following limitations:
1. Ranking method is judgmental and, therefore, it is affected by personal
preferences of job evaluators.
2. This method ranks various jobs in order of their relative worth. It does not
specify the real difference between two jobs.. For example, the exact
difference between job ranked at first and the job ranked at second cannot
be specified.
Grading Method
Job grading method also known as job classification method establishes
various grades for different categories of jobs
Advantages:
Grading system of job evaluation particularly in government jobs. is
quite popular as this has certain merits over the ranking method. These are
as follows:
1. It is quite simple to operate and understand as the relevant information
is provided by job analysis which serves other purposes too.
2. Job evaluation done on grading method makes wage and salary
determination easier as these are fixed in terms of various grades of
jobs.
Limitations:
This system of job evaluation suffers with the following limitations:
1. Job grade description is vague and personal biases may distort job
grading as the method is not based on any scientific analysis.
2. There are chances of employees' resistance when new clusters of jobs
are prepared. This is evident by the fad that government employees
agitate when recommendations of a new pay commission come.
Point Method
Point method of job evaluation is widely used in business organisations.
It is an analytical and quantitative method which determines the relative
Worth of a job on the basis of points allotted to each specific factor of a job.
MB0027
SET 2
Ans. Every organization has the option of choosing the candidates for its recruitment
processes from two kinds of sources: internal and external sources. The sources within the
organization itself (like transfer of employees from one department to other, promotions) to
fill a position are known as the internal sources of recruitment. Recruitment candidates from
all the other sources (like outsourcing agencies etc.) are known as the external sources of
recruitment.
INTERNAL SOURCES:
1. TRANSFERS
The employees are transferred from one department to another according to their efficiency
and experience.
2. PROMOTIONS
The employees are promoted from one department to another with more benefits and
greater responsibility based on efficiency and experience.
3. Others are Upgrading and Demotion of present employees according to their
performance.
4. Retired and Retrenched employees may also be recruited once again in case of shortage
of qualified personnel or increase in load of work. Recruitment such people save time and
costs of the organizations as the people are already aware of the organizational culture and
the policies and procedures.
5. The dependents and relatives of Deceased employees and disabled employees are also
done by many companies so that the members of the family do not become dependent on
the mercy of others.
EXTERNAL SOURCES:
To combines the two methods, the interviewer may start with the guided interview, which
should be not too long or cover too much territory. The interviewer is then invited to discuss
any subject that he may like to talk about. During the guided interview some persons tend
to bring in material that has no special significance in relation to the information sought.
The interviewer should observe such instances and encourage the interviewee should
observe such instances and encourage the interviewee to follow up these leads during the
unguided position of the interview. As a matter of fact, few guided interviews are strictly
kept on the detailed subjects laid out in the formal programme and a conscious effort has to
be put forth to get the most out of the unguided phases of the interview.
There are varying penalties for first, second, and third offences of the same rule. Among the
penalties available in business are:
1. Oral reprimand
2. Written reprimand
3. Loss of privileges
4. Fines
5. Lay off
6. Demotion
7. Discharge
The penalties are listed in the general order of severity, from mild to severe. For most
cases, an oral reprimand is sufficient to achieve the desired result. The supervisor must
know his or her personnel in determining how to give a reprimand. For one person, a severe
"chewing out" may be necessary in order to get attention and co-operation; another person
may require only a casual mention of a deficiency. If the offence is more serious, the
reprimand may be put in written form. Since a written reprimand is more permanent than
an oral one, it is considered a more severe penalty.
For such offences as tardiness or leaving work without permission, fines or loss of various
privileges can be used. The fines usually have some relationship to the work time actually
lost. The loss of privileges includes such items as good job assignments, right to select
machine or other equipment, and freedom of movement about the workplace or company.
The more severe penalties of layoff, demotion, and discharge are usually outside the grant
of authority to the immediate supervisor. Disciplinary layoffs can vary in severity from one
to several days' loss of work without pay. The use of demotions as a penalty is highly
questionable. If the employee is properly qualified for the present assignment, he or she will
be improperly placed on a lower job. Discharge is the most severe penalty that a business
organization can give and constitutes "industrial capital punishment".
5.Explain the importance of grievance handling
Ans.
At one or other stage of the grievance procedure, the dispute must be handled by some
member of management. In the solution of a problem, the greater burden rests on
management. The clearest opportunity for settlement is found at the first stage, before the
grievance has left the jurisdiction of the supervisor. For this reason, many firms have
specifically trained their supervisors as to how to handle a grievance or complaint properly.
The
dispute or grievance constitutes a managerial problem and the scientific method is usually
most productive in arriving at a satisfactory solution.
5. Follow up:
The objective of the grievance procedure is to resolve a disagreement between an employee
and the organization. Discussion and conference are important to this process. The purpose
of its follow up phase is to determine whether the clash of interest has been resolved. If
follow up reveals that the case has been handled unsatisfactorily or that the wrong
grievance has been processed, then redefinition of the problem, further fact finding,
analysis,
solution and follow up are required.
The managerial grid model (1964) is a behavioral leadership model developed by Robert
Blake and Jane Mouton. This model originally identified five different leadership styles based
on the concern for people and the concern for production. The optimal leadership style in
this model is based on Theory Y.
The grid theory has continued to evolve and develop. Robert Blake updated it.The theory
was updated with two additional leadership styles and with a new element, resilience.
Blake and Mouton suggested that managers who practice a 9.9 style (team management) of
leadership are more effective compared to the 9.1
style (authoritarian), or the 1,9 style (country club type). Leaders whose behavior falls into
the 5,5 style are also considered to be fairly effective.