Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Wiley and The London School of Economics and Political Science are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The British Journal of Sociology.
http://www.jstor.org
British30urnalof SociologyVolume
27 Aumber
3 September
I976
Guerlther Roth
Historyandsociology
in theworkofMaxWeber
Max Weberbeganhis academiccareeras an historianand endedit as a
sociologist,but intellectuallythis move meant for him a divisionof
labour,not an antagonisticrelationshipbetweenthe rolesof historian
and sociologist.His methodologicalpositionis not well suitedfor the
defenceof vestedinterestsin disciplinary
boundariesorforthepreference
of one academicfield over the other. I would like to suggestthat a
re-examinationof Weber'sthought may be useful primarilyfor the
sake of understandingsome of the waysin whichimportantquestions
about past and presentcan be dealt with irrespectiveof the narrow
survivalinterestsof the two disciplines.
In the courseof his careerWebergraduallycameto championa new
sociology,which differedfromthe old evolutionarysociology,against
detractorsamonghistoriansand economistswho failedto comprehend
the difference.He expectedto be recognizedas 'a partisanin methodological matters,somethingI want to be', as he wrote to Heinrich
Herknerin I909. One importantaspectof this partisanshipinvolved
the struggleagainstorganicistand otherreifiedconceptsof sociallife,
which had been basic to the old sociologyand its followersamong
evolutionaryhistorians.lWhen Weber took one of the first German
chairsin sociologyat the Universityof Munichafterthe end of World
WarI, he wrote(on g MarchI920) to the economistRobertLiefmann,
who had attackedsociology: 'I do understandyour battle against
sociology.But let me tell you: If I now happen to be a sociologist
accordingto my appointmentpapers,then I becameone in orderto
put an end to the mischievousenterprisewhich still operateswith
collectivistnotions (Kollektiabegriffie).
In other words, sociology,too,
can only be practisedby proceedingfromthe action of one or more,
few or many,individuals,that means, by employinga strictly"individualist"method.'2This remarkanticipatedWeber'selaborationin
the firstchapterof Economy
andSociety,
whichwasaboutto be published,
albeit after his sudden death. In his introductorymethodological
observationshe made it plain that with regardto this 'individualist'
method,which only througha 'tremendousmisunderstanding'
could
be equated with 'an individualistsystem of values', there was no
differencebetween sociologyand history, since 'both for sociology
in the presentsenseand for historythe objectof cognitionis the subjective meaning (Sinnzusammenhang)
of action'.3However,in the same
3o7
Guenther
Roth
308
3o9
SOCIOLOGICAL,
HISTORICAL,
Guenther
Roth
3IO
3I I
Guenther
Roth
3I2
3I3
Roth
Guenther
3I4
interestconstellationswerepredominant,everysoberanalysiswould
have to drawthe conclusionthat all economicweathervanespoint
in the directionof increasinglack of freedom.It is utterlyridiculous
to attributeelectiveaffinitywith democracyor evenfreedom(in any
sense of the word) to today's advanced capitalism that 'inevitability'of our economicdevelopment as it is now importedinto
Russiaand as it existsin the United States.Rather,the questioncan
be phrasedonly in this way: How can democracyand freedombe
maintainedin the long run under the dominanceof advanced
capitalism? They can be maintainedonly if a nationis alwaysdetermined not to be ruled like a herd of sheep. We individualistsand
partisansof democraticinstitutionsare swimmingagainstthe stream
of materialconstellations.Whoeverdesiresto be the weathervane of
a 'developmentaltendency'may abandonthoseold-fashionedideals
as quickly as possible.The rise of modern freedompresupposed
unique constellationswhich will never repeat themselves.Let us
enumeratethe mostimportantones:First,the overseasexpansion.In
Cromwell'sarmies,in the FrenchConstituentAssembly,in ourwhole
economiclife, even today, there blows that wind frombeyond the
seas.But a newcontinentis no longeravailable.Just as in antiquity,
the populationcentersof westerncultureare movingirresistiblyto
large inland areas,the North Americancontinentand Russiawith
their monotonous plains which favor uniformity. The second
constellationwas the natureof the economicand socialstructureof
the earlycapitalistepochin WesternEurope,and the thirdthe riseof
science. Finally, there were certain values that grew out of the
concrete historicaldistinctivenessof a religiousbody of thought.
These religious conceptionsshaped the ethical quality and the
'higherculture'of modernman,in combinationwith severalequally
peculiar political constellationsand with those material preconditions.22
3I5
Guenther
Roth
3I6
3 I
Augsatze zur
wherever feasible, Parsons' choice of essays from Gesammelte
(Tubingen: Mohr,
terms, I do agree with Mommsenthat Wissenschaftslehre
many passagescould be improved. In I95I) presentlyunavailablein English
drawingon a given passage,the choice are the two vigorousattackson Rudolf
of terms in translatingit often depends Stammlerand the critique of Wilhelm
upon the issuewith which the researcher Ostwald, but the Stammlercritique is
andSociety(I968),
tries to deal. A straighttranslationof a summarizedin Economy
whole work is more concerned with 325-32
andIslam,Lon9. B. S. Turner,Weber
generalreadabilityand consistencythan
with multiple meanings and nuances, don, Routledge& Kegan Paul, I974.
I 0. G. Roth, 'On Max Weber'.Contemwhich may become visible or relevant
4: 4, July I975, pp. 366-73.
only in a particular context. I have porarySociolog)",
I I. S. Andreski, 'Method and Subretranslatedthe presentpassage.
stantive Theory in Max Weber'. Brit.
5. M. Weber,op. cit., p. LVIII.
6. Max Weber, 'Die "Objektivitat" 7. Sociol.,I5: I, March I964, pp. I-I8;
sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozial- D. Beetham,Max Weberand the Theory
politischer Erkenntnis' in Gesammelteof Modern Politics, London, Allen
Tubingen, & Unwin, I974; A. Giddens, Politics
Aufsatzezur Wissenschaftslehre,
Mohr, I95I (J. Winckelmann, ed.), and Sociologyin the Thoughtof Max
on theMethod- Weber,London, Macmillan, I 972; W.
p. I53 f., and Max Weber
Glencoe, Free Mommsen,op. cit.; J. Rex, 'Typology
ologyof theSocialSciences,
and Objectivity:A commenton Weber's
Press, I949 (E. Shils, ed.), p. 66.
7. W. Mommsen, op. cit., p. Iof. Four SociologicalMethods'in A. Sahay
Weber'sapproachto constructing'par- (ed.), Max Weberand ModernSociology,
tial pictures'is paralleledby the teaching London,Routledge& KeganPaulvI97I,
practice of academic sociology, which pp. I 7-36; A. Sahay,'The Importanceof
presents its subject matter in segmen- Weber's Methodology in Sociological
talizedcourseson stratification,organiza- Explanation'in A. Sahay, op. cit., pp.
tion, politics, religion, etc. No depart- 67-8I; and B. S. Turner,op. cit.
SocioI 2. Cf., G. Roth, Contemporary
ment attempts that 'complete analysis
op. cit.
of culture' that Weber envisagedas an log)",
Model
I3. G. Roth, 'Socio-Historical
on-going effort at synthesis. Marxistorientedcoursesclaim to presenta total and DevelopmentalTheory:Charismatic
theory of society, but frequently this Community, Charismaof Reason and
boils down to little more than sum- the Counterculture',Amer.Sociol.Rev.,
mariesof the theoriesof capitalismand 40 2n April I975, pp I48-57.
For
imperialism,which put a premium on anotherexemplificationof the first two
intellectual simplification rather than levels, see my essay on 'Religion and
the study of the complex relationships RevolutionaryBeliefs'in a special issue
among the 'partialpictures'.
of SocialForces,55:2, Dec. I976 (forth8. See Weber, 'Marginal Utility coming), edited by D. Chirot, on the
Theoryand the So-CalledFundamental relationshipof historyand sociology. I
Law of Psychophysics',Louis Schneider first tried to sketchthe distinctionin R.
and
trans. and ed. Social ScienceQuarterly, Bendix and G. Roth, Scholarship
'On Some Categories of Partisanship,
I975;
Berkeleyand London, Uni56: I,
InterpretiveSociology',Edith Graeber, versityof CaliforniaPress,I97I, ch. VI,
trans. and ed. unpublishedM.A. thesis 'Sociological Typology and Historical
Explanation'.For a brief discussionof
Norman:Universityof Oklahoma,I 970;
andKnies.The Logical Problems the logic of Weber's construction of
Roscher
of Historical Economics, Guy Oakes models, which does not bring out this
trans. and ed. New York and London: differencebut views his conceptualizaThe tion in the context of present-dayuses
Free Press (Macmillan), I975;
Edward of models in social science, see P. S.
of theSocialSciences,
Methodology
Shils and H. A. Finch trans. and ed. Cohen, 'Models'. Brit. jt. Sociol.,
Glencoe: Free Press, I 949. The only I 7, I 966, pp. 70-8.
Roth
Guenther
3I8