You are on page 1of 7

PP 7767/09/2010(025354)

RHB Research
Malaysia Corporate Highlights Institute Sdn Bhd
A member of the
RHB Banking Group
Company No: 233327 -M

V is it Note
8 June 2010
MARKET DATELINE

Gamuda Share Price


Fair Value
:
:
RM2.99
RM2.74
Field Report: Tan Thang Looking To Sell Like “Hot Recom : Underperform
(Maintained)
Pho”

Table 1 : Investment Statistics (GAMUDA; Code: 5398) Bloomberg: GAM MK


Turn- Net FD Net
FYE over Profit# EPS# Growth PER EPS# C.EPS* P/CF P/NTA ROE Gearing GDY
Jul (RMm) (RMm) (sen) (%) (x) (sen) (sen) (x) (x) (%) (%) (%)
2009 2,727.3 193.7 9.7 (40.7) 31.0 - - 9.1 1.9 6.2 0.1 2.7
2010f 2,958.5 277.0 13.6 41.4 21.9 13.5 15.0 (9.5) 1.8 8.1 0.2 4.0
2011f 3,370.5 326.6 16.1 17.9 18.6 15.6 19.0 (10.6) 1.6 8.7 0.4 4.0
2012f 3,194.9 331.3 16.3 1.5 18.3 15.8 23.0 nm 1.5 8.1 0.5 4.0
Main Market Listing / Trustee Stock / Syariah-Approved Stock By The SC #Ex-EI * Consensus Based On IBES Estimates

♦ Tan Thang surrounded by high-density areas. Despite being located Issued Capital (m shares) 2,018.7
Market Cap(RMm) 6,036.0
9km away from HCMC’s CBD, the areas surrounding the site of the Tan
Daily Trading Vol (m shs) 6.3
Thang project do not at all lack the hustle and bustle of HCMC. An
52wk Price Range (RM) 2.55-3.38
estimated population of 900,000 within 5km radius of the site will translate
Major Shareholders: (%)
to ready buyers for the 7,000 units of apartments of the Tan Thang EPF 11.0
project. In addition, demand will also come from HCMC’s 12m population Raja Dato’ Seri Eleena 7.4
as well as wealthy Viet Kieu or overseas Vietnamese and “the powers that Platinum Investment 6.2
be” based in Hanoi.
FYE Jul FY10 FY11 FY12
♦ Ready to launch. Previously farm land, the land is flat and just a little EPS Revision (%) - - -
lower than the road level that means it does not need extensive ground Var to Cons (%) -9 -15 -29
treatment other than some filling to raise the elevation. Most importantly,
the land is 100% cleared of squatters. PE Band Chart

♦ Yenso Park should do well too. To our surprise, the consultants we PER = 25x
PER = 20x
spoke to in Vietnam told us that at present, the prospects of the property PER = 15x
market in Hanoi are actually stronger than HCMC. This is because Hanoi is PER = 10x

where “the powers that be” are based. In fact, some believe that “liquidity
from Hanoi” had helped to stoke the property bubble in HCMC before it
burst in 2008. According to the consultants, “given the right products,
Yenso Park should do well”.
♦ Forecasts. Maintained.
Relative Performance To FBM KLCI
♦ Risks to our view. These include: (1) New construction contracts
secured coming in above our target of RM1bn per annum in FY07/10-11;
Gamuda
and (2) A stronger-than-expected recovery in construction margins.
♦ We are Neutral on the construction sector. On one hand, we foresee
FBM KLCI
improved investors’ risk appetite for construction stocks following: (1) The
massive underperformance of the sector vis-à-vis the market in 4Q2009
and 1Q2010; and (2) A better sector news flow and new expectations
leading up to the announcement of the 10th Malaysia Plan (10MP) in June
2010. On the other hand, certain negative elements remain such as: (1)
The still slow pace of the roll-out of public projects, shrinking margins and
declining dominance of established players in large-scale projects locally;
and (2) The not-so-rosy outlook and increased operating risks in key
overseas markets.
♦ Maintain Underperform. We are raising our indicative fair value for
Gamuda by 34% from RM2.05 to RM2.74, having imputed in for the first Joshua CY Ng
time a value of RM1,231m, translating to 54sen per share on a fully- (603) 92802151
diluted basis, to Gamuda’s two property projects in Vietnam based on DCF. joshuang@rhb.com.my

Please read important disclosures at the end of this report. Page 1 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
8 June 2010

Field Report: Tan Thang Looking To Sell Like “Hot Pho”

♦ Highlights. Key takeaways/observations during our recent visit to Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC) including the site
of Gamuda’s RM6bn Tan Thang project in HCMC are:

1. We can confirm that the areas surrounding the site of the Tan Thang project are densely populated. This
dense population base translates to ready buyers for the Tan Thang project; and

2. Our conversation with consultants from the HCMC office of an international property consulting firm gave us
the comfort that Gamuda’s RM10bn Yenso Park in Hanoi should do well too.

Dense population in surrounding areas translates to ready buyers for Tan Thang

♦ Surrounded by high-density areas. Despite being located 9km away from HCMC’s CBD (see Image 1), the
areas surrounding the site of the Tan Thang project do not at all lack the hustle and bustle and usual sights of
HCMC, i.e. the sea of men, women and families on their motorbikes, people lazing on stools or little armchairs
on the sidewalks (obstructed by utility poles that hold unthinkably large numbers of overhead cables) in front of
a combination of run-down and quasi-modern looking low-rise shops standing oddly next to each others (see
Images 2 & 3).

Image 1: Location Of Tan Thang Relative To HCMC

Tan Thang

Source: Google

Image 2: A Main Road Metres Away From Tan Thang Image 3: A Typical Sight Of Areas Surrounding Tan Thang

Page 2 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
8 June 2010

♦ Huge population base. We understand that there is an estimated population of 900,000 within 5km radius of
the site. This 900,000-strong localised population will translate to ready buyers for the 7,000 units of
apartments (comprising 4,500 mid-priced units and 2,500 high-end units) of the Tan Thang project over the
next seven years. In addition, demand will also come from HCMC’s 12m population (including 3m migrant
workers) as well as wealthy Viet Kieu or overseas Vietnamese and “the powers that be” based in Hanoi.
Gamuda intends to price the mid-priced apartments at US$1,100 psm while the high-end apartments at
US$1,700 psm. Our conversation with consultants from the HCMC office of an international property consulting
firm gave us the impression that the pricing for the mid-priced apartments is reasonable, at only 10% premium
to the market rate of US$1,100 psm. We believe the premium is justifiable given the “extras” buyers are getting
including a massive 40-acre park, and various sporting and recreational facilities and amenities within the
development. However, the consultants we spoke to did think US$1,700 psm (for the high-end apartments) is
not quite the price the market is used to paying in that area.

♦ Ready to launch. Previously farm land, the land is flat and just a little lower than the road level that means it
does not need extensive ground treatment other than some filling to raise the elevation. The filling materials
can be partially sourced from excavation for car-park basements for the apartments. Most importantly, the land
is 100% cleared of squatters (see Images 4 & 5).
Image 4: Passers-by Attracted To A “Snake Show” On The Image 5: Flat Terrain And Free Of Squatters
Site*

*According to our local tour guide, the sighting of snakes is rare and Vietnamese people believe it will bring good luck

♦ Gamuda has a 60% stake. To recap, Gamuda in Mar 2010 proposed to pay US$82.8m (RM273m) for a 60%
stake in Tan Thang that holds the development rights for a piece of land measuring 204 acres at Son Ky Ward,
Tan Phu District, HCMC, Vietnam (9km from HCMC’s CBD and 3km from HCMC’s international airport). Tan
Thong has secured the key approvals from the authority to develop the land into a township comprising 7,000
apartments, a sports complex and an education centre with a total GDV of RM6bn over seven years. Other
shareholders of Tan Thang are Sacomreal (30%) and an individual (10%). Sacomreal is engaged in the
provision of real estate services and development of high-end apartments. Its sister company Sacombank is the
largest private commercial bank listed in Vietnam with 200 branches nationwide and a market capitalisation of
US$1bn (It was not difficult to find branches of Sacomreal and Sacombank in HCMC, for instance, see Image 6).
Gamuda was approached by Sacomreal about a year ago to become its JV partner for this project as Sacomreal
lacked the experience in township development and was impressed by Gamuda’s first property project in
Vietnam, i.e. Yenso Park in Hanoi.

Page 3 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
8 June 2010

Property consultants: Yenso Park should do well too

♦ Hanoi is where “the powers that be” are based. To our surprise, the consultants we spoke to told us that
at present, the prospects of the property market in Hanoi are actually stronger than HCMC. This is because
Hanoi is where “the powers that be” are based. In fact, some believe that “liquidity from Hanoi” had helped to
stoke the property bubble in HCMC before it burst in 2008. According to the consultants, “given the right
products, Yenso Park should do well”.

Image 6: A Branch Of Sacomreal/Sacombank

♦ Official maiden launches in 2H2010. During a recent analysts’ briefing, Gamuda guided US$170m and
US$100m sales from Yenso Park and the Tan Thang project in FY07/11. Soft and official maiden launches are
scheduled in May and Aug 2010 for Yenso Park, and Aug and Sep/Oct 2010 for the Tan Thang project. Gamuda
also guided that when both the projects are in full swing three years from now, they should contribute RM1.8bn
turnover and RM300m PBT combined (see Table 2).

Table 2: Gamuda’s Property Projects In Vietnam


Yenso Park, Hanoi Tan Thang, HCMC Total
Area (acres) 1,235 204 1,439
GDV (RMm) 10,000 6,000 16,000
Project life (years) 10 7 -
Capital outlay (US$m) 400* 92.8^ 492.8
Capital outlay (RMm) 1,320 306 1,626
Expected soft launch May 2010 Aug 2010 -
Expected official launch Aug 2010 Sep/Oct 2010 -
Expect sales in FY07/11 (US$m) 170 100 270
*Gamuda thus far only invested US$100m
^US$82.8m for a 60% stake in operating company + US$10m shareholders loan
Source: Company, RHBRI

♦ Forecasts. We continue not to reflect in our numbers any earnings contributions from both the property
projects in Vietnam as they are likely to be insignificant during our forecast period based on the “completion”
method under the new accounting standards.

♦ Risks to our view. These include: (1) New construction contracts secured coming in above our target of
RM1bn per annum in FY07/10-11; and (2) A stronger-than-expected recovery in construction margins.

♦ We are Neutral on the construction sector. On one hand, we foresee improved investors’ risk appetite for
construction stocks following: (1) The massive underperformance of the sector vis-à-vis the market in 4Q2009
and 1Q2010; and (2) A better sector news flow and new expectations leading up to the announcement of the
10th Malaysia Plan (10MP) in June 2010. On the other hand, certain negative elements remain such as: (1) The
still slow pace of the roll-out of public projects, shrinking margins and declining dominance of established players

Page 4 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
8 June 2010

in large-scale projects locally; and (2) The not-so-rosy outlook and increased operating risks in key overseas
markets (following the Dubai credit crisis, Dong’s devaluation and rising arbitration cases).

♦ Fair value raised to RM2.74. We are raising our indicative fair value for Gamuda by 34% from RM2.05 to
RM2.74, having imputed in for the first time a value of RM1,231m, translating to 54sen per share on a fully-
diluted basis, to Gamuda’s two property projects in Vietnam based on DCF (see Table 3). We have also rolled
forward the base year for valuation purpose from CY10 to fully-diluted CY11 (to reflect 252.3m newly listed
warrants). Despite the upward revision in indicative fair value, Gamuda remains an Underperform as upside in
share price has already been exhausted.

Table 3: Sum-Of-Parts Valuation


Segment RMm RM/shr Basis
Existing (ex-Vietnam) 5,023 2.20 14x fully-diluted CY11 net profit of RM358.8m or 15.7sen/shr
Vietnam 1,231 0.54 Yenso Park, Hanoi: GDV of RM10bn and project life of 10 years
Tan Thang, HCMC: GDV of RM6bn and project life of 7 years
PBT margin of 25%, tax rate of 25% and benchmark discount rate of 10% for property
projects. A 30% discount to NPV of RM1,759m to reflect country risk
Total 6,254 2.74

Table 4: Outstanding Construction Orderbook


Project Balance Of Works (RMbn)
Ipoh – Padang Besar double-tracking project 3.8
Nam Thuen 1 hydroelectric project 1.8
Yenso Park Infrastructure works 0.9
Outstanding works in the Gulf states 0.5
Total 7.0
Source: Company

Table 5: Earnings Forecasts Table 6: Forecast Assumptions


FYE Jul (RMm) FY09a FY10F FY11F FY12F FYE Jul FY10F FY11F FY12F

Turnover 2,727.3 2,958.5 3,370.5 3,194.9 Construction EBIT margin (%) 4.1 7.2 8.8
Turnover growth (%) 13.5 8.5 13.9 -5.2 New orderbook secured (RMbn) 1.0 1.0 2.0

EBITDA 197.9 257.3 363.6 397.1


EBITDA margin (%) 7.3 8.7 10.8 12.4

Depreciation -14.1 -14.8 -15.6 -16.4


Net Interest -44.8 -38.2 -76.6 -101.7
Associates 143.2 176.2 176.2 176.2
EI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Pretax Profit 282.2 380.4 447.6 455.2


Tax -78.0 -95.1 -111.9 -113.8
PAT 204.2 285.3 335.7 341.4
Minorities -10.5 -8.3 -9.2 -10.1
Net Profit 193.7 277.0 326.6 331.3
Source: Company data, RHBRI estimates

Page 5 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
Chart 1: Gamuda Technical View Point
♦ The share price of Gamuda reached a high of
RM3.44 in Aug 2009, before congesting around
RM3.06 – RM3.33 from Aug to Nov 2009.

♦ In late Nov, volatility increased when the stock


plunged below RM3.06 to a low of RM2.58 in Dec,
near a support of RM2.59.

♦ The stock later staged a recovery, but met a tough


support-turned-resistance level at RM3.06 in Apr
2010.

♦ As a result, it fell again to a low of RM2.70 in late


May.

♦ In recent trading, the stock regained some


momentum and trended closer to RM3.06. It closed
at RM2.99 yesterday.

♦ Recorded with a “bullish engulfing” candle on the


chart, and the upticks on the momentum
indicators, it is poised to retest RM3.06 soon.

♦ However, we are of the view that it has yet to


accumulate enough momentum to break through
the heavy resistance. As such, we see limited
upside ahead to RM3.06.

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

This report has been prepared by RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd (RHBRI) and is for private circulation only to clients of RHBRI and RHB Investment Bank Berhad
(previously known as RHB Sakura Merchant Bankers Berhad). It is for distribution only under such circumstances as may be permitted by applicable law. The
opinions and information contained herein are based on generally available data believed to be reliable and are subject to change without notice, and may differ or
be contrary to opinions expressed by other business units within the RHB Group as a result of using different assumptions and criteria. This report is not to be
construed as an offer, invitation or solicitation to buy or sell the securities covered herein. RHBRI does not warrant the accuracy of anything stated herein in any
manner whatsoever and no reliance upon such statement by anyone shall give rise to any claim whatsoever against RHBRI. RHBRI and/or its associated persons
may from time to time have an interest in the securities mentioned by this report.

This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives
of persons who receive it. The securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. RHBRI recommends that investors independently evaluate
particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of a particular investment or
strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives. Neither RHBRI, RHB Group nor any of its affiliates, employees or agents accepts
any liability for any loss or damage arising out of the use of all or any part of this report.

RHBRI and the Connected Persons (the “RHB Group”) are engaged in securities trading, securities brokerage, banking and financing activities as well as providing
investment banking and financial advisory services. In the ordinary course of its trading, brokerage, banking and financing activities, any member of the RHB
Group may at any time hold positions, and may trade or otherwise effect transactions, for its own account or the accounts of customers, in debt or equity
securities or loans of any company that may be involved in this transaction.

“Connected Persons” means any holding company of RHBRI, the subsidiaries and subsidiary undertaking of such a holding company and the respective directors,
officers, employees and agents of each of them. Investors should assume that the “Connected Persons” are seeking or will seek investment banking or other
services from the companies in which the securities have been discussed/covered by RHBRI in this report or in RHBRI’s previous reports.

This report has been prepared by the research personnel of RHBRI. Facts and views presented in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect
information known to, professionals in other business areas of the “Connected Persons,” including investment banking personnel.

The research analysts, economists or research associates principally responsible for the preparation of this research report have received compensation based
upon various factors, including quality of research, investor client feedback, stock picking, competitive factors and firm revenues.

The recommendation framework for stocks and sectors are as follows : -

Stock Ratings

Outperform = The stock return is expected to exceed the FBM KLCI benchmark by greater than five percentage points over the next 6-12 months.

Trading Buy = Short-term positive development on the stock that could lead to a re-rating in the share price and translate into an absolute return of 15% or more
over a period of three months, but fundamentals are not strong enough to warrant an Outperform call. It is generally for investors who are willing to take on
higher risks.

Market Perform = The stock return is expected to be in line with the FBM KLCI benchmark (+/- five percentage points) over the next 6-12 months.

Underperform = The stock return is expected to underperform the FBM KLCI benchmark by more than five percentage points over the next 6-12 months.

Industry/Sector Ratings

Page 6 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com
Overweight = Industry expected to outperform the FBM KLCI benchmark, weighted by market capitalisation, over the next 6-12 months.

Neutral = Industry expected to perform in line with the FBM KLCI benchmark, weighted by market capitalisation, over the next 6-12 months.

Underweight = Industry expected to underperform the FBM KLCI benchmark, weighted by market capitalisation, over the next 6-12 months.

RHBRI is a participant of the CMDF-Bursa Research Scheme and will receive compensation for the participation. Additional information on recommended
securities, subject to the duties of confidentiality, will be made available upon request.

This report may not be reproduced or redistributed, in whole or in part, without the written permission of RHBRI and RHBRI accepts no liability whatsoever for the
actions of third parties in this respect.

Page 7 of 7

A comprehensive range of market research reports by award-winning economists and analysts are exclusively
available for download from www.rhbinvest.com

You might also like