Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
ScienceDirect
Journal of Hydro-environment Research 9 (2015) 354e367
www.elsevier.com/locate/jher
Research paper
Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
b
College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
c
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
d
Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA
e
Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth 6000, Australia
f
Environmental Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth 6000, Australia
g
Department of Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA
h
Fujian Provincial Investigation, Design and Hydropower, Fuzhou 350001, China
Received 2 August 2013; revised 13 January 2014; accepted 29 January 2014
Available online 16 December 2014
Abstract
Flexible emergent vegetation has a remarkable impact on flow structure, flood control and ecological restoration. In this study, the variation of
flow turbulence and kinetic energy characteristics caused by artificial flexible emergent vegetation were studied by measuring the flow velocity
with a 3D acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) in an open flume. Experiments were carried out in five vegetation densities at two flow discharges, which commonly occur in rivers. The findings revealed that flexible emergent vegetation had a great resistance on flow to quickly
reduce the average velocity, especially at the foliage part. In vegetation zone, vertical velocity profiles were roughly divided into two layers: the
upper layer (z/z0 > 0.3) and the bottom layer (z/z0 < 0.3). The demarcation line of foliage and sheath stem (z/z0 0.3) were observed to be a key
point to impact the Reynolds stress, turbulence intensity and turbulence kinetic energy. This area was the momentum exchange area, turbulence
and Reynolds stress increased gradually along with the streamwise distance. At the same time, the larger vegetation density, the greater turbulence momentum exchanged. The experiment also measured Manning's coefficient n and obtained that vegetation density was a more
important factor to influence roughness than flow discharge. A linear relationship was obtained between vegetation density and Manning's n. The
findings in this paper will be useful for understanding the impact of emergent vegetation on the flow pattern, flood control and designing aquatic
vegetation restoration.
2014 International Association for Hydro-environment Engineering and Research, Asia Pacific Division. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
Aquatic plants play an important role in the beauty and
flood control of rivers, lakes, and also impact the flow
* Corresponding author. College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing
210098, China. Tel.: 86 13951787286.
E-mail address: liyiping@hhu.edu.cn (Y. Li).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2014.01.006
1570-6443/ 2014 International Association for Hydro-environment Engineering and Research, Asia Pacific Division. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
that flow velocity under the existence of the emergent vegetation can be decreased apparently, especially in the foliage
part. It is a great significance on the river's flood control.
Meanwhile, the foliage can promote sedimentation of small
sediment particles and organic particles. Brix (1994) found
that the emergent vegetation on the absorption of N, P was
greater than submerged vegetation.
Over the past few decades, researchers considered importance of analyzing the flow characteristics and estimating the
hydraulic resistance in open channel with vegetation (Cowan,
1956; Chow, 1959; Petryk and Bosmajian, 1975). Because of
the complex situation with real plants in the river, rigid stem
cylinders are first considered to simulate natural plants. A series
of experiments were undertaken in 2D and 3D model to make
the process simple and simulate the Manning's n coefficient and
drag force (Darby, 1999; Wu, 2008; Noarayanan et al., 2012) to
find out the interior reason for change in velocity and turbulence
characteristics. Nepf (1999) developed a model to describe the
drag, turbulence and diffusion for flow through emergent
vegetation. In the analysis, she covered the natural range of
vegetation density and stem Reynolds numbers to extend the
cylinder-based model for vegetative resistance by including the
dependence of the drag coefficient, CD. Following the contribution of researchers, the rigid cylinder analogy was deemed a
good starting point in attempting to understand flowevegetation interactions. Nevertheless, vegetation elements,
e.g. foliage and bend, had a significant impact on the experimental results. Therefore, Schnauder (2004) proved that the
frontal area (or momentum absorbing area) decreased as a result
of vegetation bending. Based on these facts, Yagci and Kabdasli
(2008) used three real tree saplings to analyze the cumulative
volume, V versus relative height, z/z0 relationship (where z
represented location of measuring point and z0 referred to the
water depth). Wilson et al. (2006) then studied the influence of
rigid stems and flexible plants on the drag force and on velocity
profiles. Wilson et al. (2008) determined the contribution of a
plant's foliage to the total plant's hydrodynamic drag. It was
found that the flexibility of the plant's foliage and its ability to
streamline with the flow potentially decreased the total drag
extraordinarily. Hui and Hu (2010) considered single leafy
shrub and three mixed communities (including shrub-grass,
shrub-reed and reed-grass community) in their experiment to
find out the effects of ecological factors (diameter and flexibility) and vegetation community composition on the drag coefficient related with vegetation. O'Hare et al. (2007) used five
different macrophytes from a lowland river to consider the drag
and reconfiguration. The vegetation changed shape and bend
with the increasing velocity, which in turn reduced the flow
rate. The Manning's coefficient n was expressed as a function of
hydraulics radius, flexibility, Froude number, vertical velocity
and index of the vegetation (Noarayanan et al., 2012).
Although there had been previous research dedicated to the
topic of vegetationeflow interaction, the quantitative equations and relationships for describing the detailed flow
structure and Manning roughness coefficient in different
vegetation densities and flow discharges associated with
emergent vegetation were still unclear. This study was thus
355
necessitated mainly to investigate and describe the flow patterns and turbulence structure in open channel in this regard.
The objectives of this study were (1) to understand the role of
flexible emergent vegetation with different densities on
changing the flow structures along the streamwise direction
and the variation between the flow structures with the characteristics of the plant itself, and then (2) to figure out the
reason of the momentum exchange in vegetation zone and the
relationship between Reynolds stress, turbulence intensity
and vegetation density in the channel, and then (3) to prove
that vegetation could obviously increase the Manning's coefficient and investigate the relationship between the Manning's coefficient and the emergent vegetation's density, shape
etc. These findings in this paper could be useful for flood
control, aquatic vegetation restoration and river management
in nature world.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Experimental apparatus and conditions
All the experiments were conducted in the Hydraulics
Laboratory in Hohai University, China. The experimental
apparatus was mainly composed of two pumps, an inlet section to generate fully developed turbulent flow, a test section
with a rectangle flume to operate interaction between overflow
and vegetation and an outlet section with an adjustable weir.
The re-circulating flume was 0.5 m wide, 1 m high and 30 m
long, with glass sidewalls and concrete bottom (Fig. 1). In
order to decrease the inlet turbulence and maintain the uniform
flow, a wave dissipation board was set at the upstream of the
flume. A triangle weir located at the downstream of the flume
was used to control the water level keeping in 0.5 m depth
accurately. Preliminary experiments were carried out to ensure
there was no flow turbulence effect due to the dissipation
board within the measurement region. It was long enough far
from the inlet to ensure that the water flows through the plant
was smooth and the measurement data were accurate. A three
dimensional Macro-Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry (ADV)
(SonTek, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to measure the velocity and turbulence at a frequency of 20 Hz with 30 second
(s) sampling time. From initial control experimental run
(Fig. 2), it was revealed that the sampling frequency was
enough to obtain accurate velocity and turbulence characteristics (Jarvela, 2005). Thus, 600 data measurements were
collected at each location and with post-processing software
(WinADV), and an average velocity value was obtained.
Measurements at 50 mm below the surface could not be taken
due to ADV limitations. For more information about the
application of ADV on flow measurement in a flume, refer to
Chen's paper (2011).
2.2. Basic characteristics of the vegetation elements and
experimental setup
The simulation of emergent vegetation, similar to Phragmites australis (hv 65 cm), was utilized (Fig. 3) in the
356
Fig. 1. General layout of the experimental re-circulating open channel flume set up.
Fig. 2. One complete time series belonging to velocity record by ADV. The sampling frequency was 20 Hz and 30 s time at flow discharges of 0.06025 m3/s.
357
q
urms varu2i
k
1 2
urms v2rms w2rms
2
Property
Value
65 cm
50 cm
15 cm
9 cm
0.2 cm
8 cm
0.025 m2
k0:5
Vm
where Vm was the mean flow velocity which was equal to ratio
of Q/A, Q denoted flow discharge, A denoted wetted area.
2.4. The Manning's roughness coefficient n
1 2 1
n R3h S2
u
DTKE
Vu2
V2
hu d hd Hf
2g
2g
(
Hf vegnon
2
2
Vuvegnon
Vdvegnon
hdvegnon
2g
)
huvegnonl
8
358
Fig. 5. a) Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) board used to stick in vegetation with pre-drilled holes. Cross distribution was set to make sure the uniform vegetation density.
b) Four vegetation configurations represents different densities of vegetation used in the flume, 40 stem/m2, 50 stem/m2, 60 stem/m2 and 70 stem/m2 respectively.
The cross with a circle represents hole with a plant, while the cross without a circle means hole without a plant.
2=3
1=2
nveg
* Rh *Svegnon
Vvegnon
1
2=3
1=2
* Rh *Snon
Vnon
1
Where n(veg) was Manning coefficient relative only to vegetation, V(vegnon) was average velocity with vegetation,
Vu(vegnon) was upstream velocity measured with vegetation in
position 1, Vd(vegnon) was downstream velocity measured with
vegetation in position 8, V(non) was average velocity measured
without vegetation, hu(vegnon) was depth of flow upstream of
the vegetation in position 1, hd(vegnon) was depth of flow at the
downstream location with vegetation in position 8, S(vegnon)
was energy slope with vegetation and S(non) was energy slope
without vegetation, BG was length of the vegetation zone, Rh
was hydraulic radius and Hf(vegnon) was energy loss of head
due to friction.
3. Results
Series of experiments with varying vegetation densities and
flow discharges were conducted to investigate the flow structure, Reynolds stress, turbulence intensity, kinetic energy
characteristics and Manning's roughness coefficients n in the
presence of the emergent vegetation. It was found that
different conditions produced different results.
359
Fig. 6. Location of the eight ADV measuring sections within the flume. P1 to P8 represent position 1 to 8, respectively. All the measurement points (the black
circles) were set in the central line, and ten different vertical points throughout the whole depth (an interval of 5 cm for the upper 3 points and an interval of 2 cm
for the rest points).
Fig. 7. The vertical velocity profile of 0.06025 m3/s on different vegetation densities. The dotted line represents the demarcation of foliage and sheath stem.
360
Fig. 8. The variation of the velocity along streamwise direction at different vegetation densities. a) 50 stems/m2 vegetation; b) 70 stems/m2 vegetation density. The
dotted line represents the demarcation of foliage and sheath stem. The black curve represents the demarcation line of the smaller velocity and larger velocity
compared to the non-disturbed flow.
361
Fig. 9. Vertical distribution profiles of Reynolds stresses at the longitudinal and vertical directions (u0 v0 , u0 w0 ). The dotted line represents the demarcation of
foliage and sheath stem. The unit of Reynolds stresses was cm2/s2.
362
Fig. 10. Vertical distribution profiles of turbulence intensity of three directions in five densities (urms, vrms, wrms as representation). The dotted line represents the
demarcation of foliage and sheath stem. The unit of root mean squared velocity was cm/s.
Fig. 11. The vegetation dimensionless turbulent kinetic energy ratio (DTKE ) of different densities in positions 1, 4, 6, 8. The dotted line represents the demarcation
of foliage and sheath stem.
the flume. Around z/z0 0.3 the DTKE increased greatly, the
maximum value was almost 1, twice times as it near the surface, suggesting that this part had an obvious turbulence kinetic energy exchange. While at the bottom of the flume, the
DTKE reached its maximum value, indicating that the
boundary layer effect played a drastic role on the vertical
distribution of turbulence kinetic energy.
Vegetation density also impacted the distribution of turbulence kinetic energy. Although outside the vegetation zone,
there was little change of DTKE at different vegetation densities. Inside the vegetation zone, however, the density of the
vegetation played an important role in the values of DTKE. In
the kinetic energy exchange area, a larger vegetation density
resulted in a greater turbulent kinetic energy, e.g. one of the
most obvious Position 6, the maximum value (when density
was 70 stems/m2) was close to 1. However, in the conditions
of small vegetation densities (e.g. 0 and 40 stems/m2), the
values of DTKE at the demarcation of the foliage and sheath
stem part were less than 0.5.
3.3. The Manning's roughness coefficient n
In general, the Manning coefficient comprehensively reflects the influence of flume roughness on the flow under the
presence of emergent vegetation in this study. The Manning's n
in different discharges and different densities were considered
in this experiment, which expressed as a function of flow rate
and vegetation density. The relationship between Manning's n
and vegetation density at each flow rate was obtained
(Fig. 12). In order to better understand the influence of the
resistance on flow, the Froude number and Reynolds number
based on depth under experimental conditions were selected to
reflect the impact of vegetation (Table 2). The equation for
Froude number and Reynolds number were shown as below.
Vm
r*Vm *hm
Fr p and Re
m
g*hm
where g Gravitational constant; r mass density of water;
m kinematic viscosity coefficient, hm was the height of
measuring point.
363
Table 2
The experiment conditions for different vegetation densities and discharges.
Re is the Reynolds number based on the flow depth.
Test
number
Discharge
(m3/s)
Stem density
(stems/m2)
Manning's n
Fr
Re
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
0.03832
70
60
50
40
0
70
60
50
40
0
0.087
0.082
0.070
0.055
0.020
0.074
0.069
0.059
0.053
0.013
0.051
0.054
0.056
0.065
0.069
0.089
0.090
0.091
0.092
0.109
44,951.38
46,074.98
49,172.63
57,438.02
58,951.92
77,751.92
78,648.35
78,832.29
78,967.73
92,692.31
0.06025
11
364
4. Discussion
4.1. Mean velocity profiles
Velocity profiles could be roughly divided into two layers
suggesting that emergent vegetation played an important role
on the flow structure, dependent on vegetation densities and
the locations of foliage and sheath stem. For the purpose of
this study, emergent vegetation had an important effect on flow
structure of river channel and flood control.
A series of analyses in this study showed that the vertical
velocity decreased drastically outside the vegetation zone,
especially at the downstream section. It is possible because
that the vegetation increased the roughness and friction
resistance of the flume, which resulted in a significant negative
effect on the uniform flow. Bennett et al. (2002) also
concluded similar experimental results with several discontinuous small vegetation zones. In our experiment, however,
due to a long vegetation zone, the resistance of the vegetation
to flow was more apparent, comparable to the effect of a big
blockage. So the velocities took a large amount of attenuation,
in particular outside the downstream.
In this study, the velocity profiles were divided into two
layers, which was mainly due to the nature characteristics of
vegetation elements as shown in Fig. 4. The cumulative volume of vegetation and vegetation height was inversely proportional relationship. The flow resistance was increased as
volume of foliage area became larger. It was also noted that
the sheath stem part had a significant impact on the flow
through the whole vegetation zone. The demarcation point of
foliage and sheath stem was found to be a significant position,
as also found by Wang and Wang (2010). Our experimental
results obtained that the flexibility of the plant's foliage had the
ability to reduce the velocity considerably. The cumulative
volume was very small when the relative depth of measurement points was less than 0.3, but increased significantly when
relative depth was greater than 0.3 (Fig. 4). Therefore, the
velocity profiles formed an apparent stratification phenomenon
decreasing in the upper layer and increasing in the bottom
layer.
In order to understand the streamwise velocities inside the
vegetation zone along the streamwise direction, five
different positions were set up. Unlike Yagci et al. (2010),
who only investigated the impacts of individual vegetation to
the mean velocity at a certain distance, our experiment
showed the variation along the propagation direction inside
the vegetation zone. In this experiment, five densities (0, 40,
50, 60, 70 stems/m2) were chosen to investigate the flow
structure. To better understand the effect of different positions of the vegetation under different densities in our
0
experiment, the description of retaining percentage uu
u0
(Yagci, 2010) was used to analyse the flow domain characteristics. Where u was the time-averaged streamwise velocity
in the locations upstream, the u0 was the time-averaged flow
velocity under non-disturbed condition. The change of the
flow velocity could be easily investigated by using this
simple formula.
365
Fig. 13. The retaining percentage of the vertical velocity under 50 and 70 stems/m2 vegetation density.
366
Table 3
Unit depth discharge of the foliage section and the sheath stem section in a discharge of 0.06025 m3/s from position 2 to 7.
Vegetation density (stems/m2)
70
qf
qs
qf/qs
qf
qs
qf/qs
qf
qs
qf/qs
qf
qs
qf/qs
60
50
40
Positions
0.106
0.113
0.933
0.114
0.120
0.952
0.089
0.107
0.830
0.106
0.107
0.991
0.091
0.133
0.686
0.120
0.140
0.857
0.106
0.120
0.881
0.109
0.113
0.958
0.120
0.140
0.857
0.123
0.133
0.921
0.120
0.113
1.059
0.117
0.113
1.034
0.143
0.153
0.932
0.146
0.147
0.994
0.131
0.127
1.038
0.117
0.120
0.976
0.109
0.140
0.776
0.131
0.140
0.939
0.131
0.127
1.038
0.126
0.120
1.048
0.126
0.127
0.992
0.114
0.113
1.008
0.109
0.113
0.958
0.117
0.127
0.925
stem. Unit depth discharge of the foliage part (qf) and the stem
part (qs) was used here to analyze these phenomenon (Table 3
(discharge 0.06025 m3/s)) with the outside vegetation zone
not being considered. In general, the unit depth discharge of
the foliage part was smaller than the stem part, for the foliage
part occupied most of the water height. The average flow ratio
increased as the density decreased (Table 3). For example, the
average flow ratio was the smallest (qf/qs 0.863) in the
biggest density (70 stems/m2), which could be explained that
the resistance of the upper foliage part was larger with more
vegetation, inducing most of the water went through the bottom stem part (no foliage). The change of qf/qs from density
60 to 70 stems/m2 was more than 0.1, while it was only 0.04
from 40 to 60 stems/m2. Through a series of analyses, we
could find that the change range of the velocity or turbulence
characteristics became largest with the largest vegetation
density (70 stems/m2). It might be considered that in the
condition of our laboratory, the density of 70 stems/m2 was a
relatively large density, and this finding might be useful for the
flood control under emergent vegetation.
5. Conclusions
This paper measured the effect of emergent vegetation on
flow structures using a 3D acoustic Doppler velocity apparatus
(ADV) in an open channel flume. Different properties such as
vertical velocities, turbulence characteristics and Manning's
roughness coefficient n were investigated under five vegetation
densities and two discharges. The results shows that the vertical distribution of streamwise velocity profiles could be
divided into two layers which depended on the demarcation of
foliage and sheath stem inside the vegetation zone. And a
logarithmic curve was generated to divide the demarcation of
the smaller and larger velocity compared to the velocities on
non-disturbed condition along the streamwise direction. It
achieved stability at the middle of the vegetation zone (about
350 cm). When vegetation density was 70 stems/m2, maximal
velocity increased nearly 70% compared to the non-disturbed
flow. The energy exchange mainly occurred at this unstable
0.116
0.134
0.863
0.125
0.132
0.945
0.114
0.118
0.967
0.115
0.117
0.989
367
Yagci, O., Tschiesche, U., Kabdasli, M.S., 2010. The role of different forms of
natural riparian vegetation on turbulence and kinetic energy characteristics.
Adv. Water Resour. 33, 601e614.
Glossary