You are on page 1of 2

ASSIGNMENT

2
MGN538 LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
RUBRICS
Criteria
Standards

Identification of leadership
traits

Mar High
Distinction
k Distinction
5 Identifies and Identifies and
examines major examines major
Leadership traits alternative
concepts with Leadership traits
depth, detail and concepts clearly
clarity.
and accurately.

Credit

Pass

Fail (0-1)

Identifies and
Identifies and Limited grasp of
examines
examines
leadership traits,
important
alternative
lacking in
alternative
Leadership traits critical
leadership traits but with some examination.
but occasionally limitations,
lacks clarity or
inconsistency
accuracy. Critique and/or
is limited.
inaccuracy.
Superficial
critique.
(2-3)

(4-5)
Application of these theoretical
concepts and how they influence
managerial practices.

Concept clarity and


understanding of content.

Highlighting evidences and


communication skills

5 Clearly
demonstrates a
high level
ability to
synthesise
theory and
practice using
readings and/or
alternative
perspectives.

(0-1)
(1-2)

(3-4)
Able to interpret Able to identify
the relationship the relevant
between theory relationships
and practice
between theory
accurately. Offers and practice.
appropriate and Offers some
relevant examples evaluation, but
to support line of occasionally lack
argument.
consistency.

Demonstrates an Descriptive.
adequate level Reproduces
of
information
understanding from lectures
relating theory and readings.
to practice; and The relationship
some
between theory
consideration and practice
provided of
underdeveloped
alternative
and is poorly
perspectives.
argued.

(4-5)
(3-4)
(2-3)
(1-2)
5 Shows deep
Shows detailed Shows a degree of Examples of
critical
critical reflection critical reflection alternative
reflection of
of content
of content
perspectives are
content analysis analysis of the
analysis of the
provided;
of the leaders leaders speech. leaders
reflection is
speech.
A strong argument speechNotes
superficial
A strong and
is made to support alternative
rather than
reasoned
the
perspectives and meaningful.
argument is
recommendations. provides
Shows a basic
made to support
examples where level of
the
necessary to
understanding
recommendation
support
of the leaders.
s.
(3.5-4.5)
recommendations
(1.5-2.5)
(4-5)
(2.5-3.5)
5 Group
Group discussion Clear structure. Structure of the
discussion
structuring that Adequate use of discussion is
structure uses expresses
sentences and
apparent, fair
clear and
evidences
paragraphs.
use of topic and
concise succinct properly. The
Guidelines
linking
with excellent argument in the followed
sentences and
ability with
discussion is clear clearly.. Paragrap paragraphs.
grammar,
and logical way. hs are succinct. Some of the
vocabulary and demonstrated.
Generally good guidelines
spelling.
Substantial ability ability with
followed.
Impeccable
with grammar,
grammar, and
Adequate level
evidences in
spelling and
spelling;
of control over

(0-1)
Engagement is
minimal.
Recommendatio
ns are reached
providing no or
little evidence.
Shows scant
level of content
analysis.
(0-1)

No apparent
structure. Poor
sentence and
paragraph
construction.
Guidelines not
followed.
Language not
professional,
inclusive or
respectful.
Paragraphs off

ASSIGNMENT
2
MGN538 LEADERSHIP AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR
RUBRICS
Outstanding
vocabulary.
discussion.
Ample relevant
Highly
evidences
appropriate
evidences in the
discussion
(3.5-4.5)

appropriate
vocabulary.
Significant but
limited evidences
in the discussion.

(4-5)

grammar, fair the point.


ability with
Inadequate
spelling and
ability with
vocabulary.
grammar, poor
Referencing
vocabulary and
lacks specificity spelling. Insuffic
evidences with ient and/or
some
inaccurate
inaccuracies.
evidences
provided.

(2.5-3.5)
(1.5-2.5)

Class Participation

Resource collection

4 Highly
Participative, has
participative and done speech
comes prepared analysis
in every
appropriately.
discussion. Has Demonstrate his
thorough
involvement in
understanding discussion in the
of the leaders. classroom.
Has done
(3-4)
outstanding
speech analysis.
(4-5)
6 Quality of all
videos
outstanding
More clarity of
speech. Team
work
demonstrated.
(5-6)

Quality of videos
and team work is
appropriate.
(4.5-3.5)

(0-1)
Fair in classroom Involvement in Inadequate/
activities. Has
the discussion very less
done speech
but lacks in
involvement in
analysis of some some kind of
the classroom
leaders. But
clarity of
discussions. Has
showed limited thoughts. Just not showed
involvement at
participating but enthusiasm in
times.
with less
each discussion.
(2-3)
meaningful
(0-1)
discussions.
(2-1)

Quality of videos
collected is fair
and not very
strong team work
(3.5-2.5)

Qualities of
Poor and limited
videos collected access to quality
were not very videos. Not all
clear. Very less are of good
content could be quality. Poor
drawn out of it. team work
(2.5-1.5)
demonstrated.
(0-1)

You might also like