Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Film thickness calculation in elasto-hydrodynamic lubricated line and elliptical contacts: The Dowson,
Higginson, Hamrock contribution
A A Lubrecht, C H Venner and F Colin
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology 2009 223: 511
DOI: 10.1243/13506501JET508
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://pij.sagepub.com/content/223/3/511
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
On behalf of:
Additional services and information for Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology
can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://pij.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://pij.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://pij.sagepub.com/content/223/3/511.refs.html
511
Abstract: This article traces the contribution of the Dowson and Higginson work to numerical line
contact elasto-hydrodynamic lubricated lm thickness prediction and the Hamrock and Dowson
contribution to the lm thickness prediction in elliptical contacts. Considering the line contact
work, this article shows that both the numerical pressure and lm thickness results and the curvetted lm thickness predictions are very accurate, even by todays standards. Concerning the
elliptical results, the authors show that the original predictions remain surprisingly accurate but
that the issue of the minimum to central lm thicknesss ration Hm /Hc is not yet completely settled.
The article then continues to discuss some limitations of the current models that require additional work, mainly in the area of realistic non-Newtonian lubricant rheology for lm thickness
predictions and pressure spike analysis.
Keywords: elasto-hydrodynamic lubricant, lm thickness, line contact, elliptical contact,
numerical solution
INTRODUCTION
The introduction of the electronical computer has revolutionized the eld of science and technology. In
the area of elasto-hydrodynamic lubricated (EHL) lm
thickness predictions, only few analytical solutions
exist. The pioneering numerical work of Dowson and
Higginson on the EHL line contact and that of Hamrock and Dowson on the elliptical EHL contact have
created an important new eld in Tribology: numerical elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication (EHL)! As a result
of their work, the lm thickness in an EHL contact can
be predicted with accuracy from the contact geometry
and the operating conditions. Using three dimensionless parameters W , U , and G, they simplied the lm
thickness representation. The minimum and central
Corresponding
LINE CONTACT
512
Fig. 1
EHL line contact pressure distributions from reference [2]; vertical scale has been
non-dimensionalized with respect to the Hertzian pressure ph
Table 1
Hcalc
109
5.15 104
4.99 104
9.81 105
2.03 105
4.05 106
8.05 107
1010
1011
1012
1013
Fig. 2
9.85 105
2.05 105
4.09 106
8.13 107
Due to computing power limitations, the rst circular and elliptical pressure and lm thickness solutions
Fig. 3
513
Elliptical contact lm thickness distribution for Ry /Rx = 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 50.0 (see Table 2 for
the operating conditions)
Table 2
Ry /Rx
Hc
Hc-calc
Hm
Hm-calc
1.0
2.0
5.0
10.0
20.0
50.0
100.0
1.11 107
2.13 107
4.48 107
7.45 107
1.19 106
2.13 106
3.25 106
6.28 106
6.84 106
7.43 106
7.58 106
7.49 106
7.23 106
7.03 106
6.30 106
6.53 106
6.61 106
6.43 106
6.42 106
6.41 106
6.40 106
3.59 106
4.51 106
5.53 106
5.91 106
5.94 106
5.74 106
5.57 106
3.66 106
4.33 106
5.19 106
5.39 106
5.38 106
5.37 106
5.37 106
Table 3
Ry /Rx
Hc
Hc-calc
Hm
Hm-calc
1.0
2.0
5.0
10.0
20.0
50.0
100.0
8.86 107
1.70 106
3.58 106
5.96 106
9.54 106
1.71 105
2.60 105
3.50 105
3.81 105
4.14 105
4.22 105
4.17 105
4.03 105
3.92 105
3.62 105
3.78 105
3.84 105
3.82 105
3.82 105
3.80 105
3.79 105
2.03 105
2.56 105
3.13 105
3.35 105
3.36 105
3.25 105
3.15 105
2.26 105
2.66 105
3.15 105
3.32 105
3.31 105
3.29 105
3.27 105
514
1.2
1.2e-05
1e-05
0.8
8e-06
P 0.6
6e-06 H
0.4
4e-06
0.2
2e-06
0
-1.5
Y
Fig. 4
-1
-0.5
0.5
0
1.5
X
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The rst author is indebted to A. Nijkamp for facilitating the completion of this paper.
REFERENCES
1 Dowson, D. and Higginson, G. R. A numerical solution
to the elastohydrodynamic problem. J. Mech. Eng. Sci.,
1959, 1, 6.
2 Dowson, D., Higginson, G. R., and Whitaker, A. V. Elastohydrodynamical lubrication: a survey of isothermal
solutions. J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 1961, 4, 121126.
3 Dowson, D. and Higginson, G.R. Elastohydrodynamic
lubrication, the fundamentals of roller and gear lubrication, 1966 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, Great Britain).
4 Venner C. H. and Lubrecht A. A. Multilevel methods in
lubrication, vol. 37, 2000, p. 379 (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
5 Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts, part I, theoretical
formulation. ASME J. Lubr. Tech., 1976, 98, 223229.
6 Hamrock, B. J. and Dowson, D. Isothermal elastohydrodynamic lubrication of point contacts, part III, fully
ooded results. ASME J. Lubr. Tech., 1977, 99, 264276.
7 Moes, H. Lubrication and beyond. In Lecture notes,
2000, p. 386 (Twente University), available from the
University of Twente server http://www.tr.ctw.utwente.
nl/Organisation/Links/index.html.
h
H
H , Hm
Hc
p
ph
P
Rx
Ry
um
U
w
W
APPENDIX
Notation
a
b
E
G
X,Y
0
0
515
lm thickness
dimensionless lm thickness
(H = h/Rx )
dimensionless minimum lm thickness
(one- and two-dimensional)
dimensionless central lm thickness
pressure (Pa)
maximum Hertzian pressure (Pa)
dimensionless pressure (P = p/ph )
reduced radius of curvature in x-direction
reduced radius of curvature in y-direction
mean velocity in x-direction
(um = (u1 + u2 )/2)
dimensionless speed parameter
(U = (0 um )/(E Rx ))
load (per unit length (one-dimensional))
dimensionless load parameter
W = w/(E Rx ), W = w/(E Rx2 ) (one- and
two-dimensional, respectively)
dimensionless coordinates (X = x/a,
Y = y/b)
viscosity pressure coefcient (Pa1 )
viscosity at ambient pressure (Pa s)
density at ambient pressure (kg/m3 )