Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Connectors
In this exercise, we will use bolt connectors to replace the physical bolts and eye
bolt. With the absence of the eye bolt, the external load is applied as a remote load.
This exercise reinforces the following skills:
Problem
Statement
A bar is attached to a base plate with two loose fitting bolts: bolt
diameter is 12 mm, hole diameter is 12.2 mm.
Eye bolt
Base Plate
Bolts
Bar
The base plate is supported along both sides. The eye bolt is loaded in vertical
and horizontal directions with 1,100 N [247 lb] forces, as indicated in the figure
below. It is assumed that the eye is rather stiff and provides a nearly rigid
connection between the forces and the strip.
Both the bar and the base plate are manufactured from steel AISI 1020.
Fixed Support
Fixed Support
Vertical
Load 1,100
N.
Horizontal
Load 1,100 N
Create Study.
Create a static study named two bolts - torque preload.
Apply material.
Apply AISI 1020 steel as the material for both parts.
Edges
defining bolt
heads
You can verify with hand calculations that the corresponding axial bolt preload
force is 66,666N [16,860 lb]. Consequently, bolt tensile stress equals 590 MPa
[96,160 psi] which is 95% of the yield strength of Alloy Steel.
Show Exploded View.
Apply fixture.
Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture to the
two side faces on the base plate.
10 Mesh assembly.
Select Curvature based mesh under
Mesh Parameters.
Create High quality mesh with the default settings.
11 Run the analysis.
12 Review Results
13 .
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
16
stresses are located and notice that the size of the hot spot is smaller
than that of the element size. Therefore, stresses in this area are reported with a
large error. Mesh refinement would be required to obtain more accurate maximum
stress results.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
37
39
38
It can be seen that the
bar and the base plate separate
from each other.
42
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
41
The axial bolt forces in Bolt Connector-1 and Bolt Connector-2
are 66,667 N and 69,057 N.
43
As compared to the bolt preload of 66,666 N, the effect of the external
load is very small. A negligible change in bolt axial load is desirable if we want to
avoid bolt loosening.
61
62
Exercise 22:
Beam Elements
63
The simplified model
of a conveyor frame (shown
64
in the figure) is
manufactured from Plain
65
Carbon Steel with all
the joints welded.
66
67
During the inspection,
it was found that the weld at
the indicated joint
68
became defective and
was not capable of
69
transmitting
the moments.
80
All six legs of the frame are bolted to the ground but only the two
inclined legs can actually transmit the moments to the floor.
81
87
88
1
90
2
93
3
76
M
oment
Foundatio
n
78
In this exercise you will analyze the frame when subjected to the
extreme operating loading conditions (combination of an isolated force and a
moment).
79
84
85
86
72
73
74
75
70
77
83
71
Defective
weld
82
Procedure
95
96
4
Beam elements.
97
Expand the folder Conveyor
Frame and you can see that all the solid
bodies of the weldment have a beam icon
98
Right-click the Cut List folder
and select Delete. All the beams are now in
the Conveyor Frame folder.
99
101
104
105
106
107
108
111
112
113
114
5
100
The sixteen beam elements were
automatically generated because the part file was
a weldment.
102
103
Slenderness ratio
Beam
elements are typically used to
represent long, slender
components. For the beam
formulation to produce acceptable
results, the length of the beam
should be 10 times larger than the
largest dimension of its cross
section.
109
The software automatically
110
detects the ratio and warns the user about the beams having a
slenderness ratio of less than 10.
Specify material.
115
116
38
1
118
120
121
122
124
2
119
123
If needed, the joints may be modified and re-calculated. In this exercise
this step is not required.
126
125
127
38
2
128
3
130
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
4
131
Under the Conveyor Frame folder, right-click on the beam
element corresponding to the inclined member with the faulty weld and select Edit
definition.
Create a hinge.
149
The two end points are graphically shown as red and blue circles. Select
Hinge for the upper connection between the joint and the beam. Click OK to
confirm the settings.
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
1
176
178
2
legs.
177
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
3
192
194
196
193
Under Selection
click Beams
then select
the two beams shown.
195
Apply 67,000 N
[15,062 lb] force in the
Normal to Plane direction
(with reference to the Top
plane). Select Reverse
direction.
197
Click OK.
198
199
4
202
205
5
207
6
203
Apply a 45,000 N
[10,116 lb] force and a 2,260
N-m [20,000 lb-in] moment
to the corner joint. The force
and the moment are oriented
in the Normal to Plane and
Along Plane Dir1 directions
with reference
204
to the Front plane, respectively.
206
Notice how quickly the study completes. If solid or shell elements were
used instead, the computations would take considerably longer.
209
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
210
Zoom closer to the section where both inclined members connect to the
top of the frame. Notice that the member with the faulty weld rotated at the joint
location, while the other member remains perpendicular irrespective of the
structural deformations. This indicates that the faulty weld connection does not
transmit moments, indeed.
226
228
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
269
271
227
Under Display select Moment in Dir 1
and the units of N-m.
229
Under Selected
Beams, click Select and
pick the inclined beam with
the faulty weld.
242
268
We can see a linear variation of the bending moment in the elemental
direction 1. Note that the moment at the faulty joint is zero.
270
The large negative value of -3850 N-m then corresponds to the moment
along the elemental direction 1 transmitted to the floor.
273
275
272
274
Under List select Stresses, set the units to SI and click OK.
276
277
278
The List Forces dialog window shows a complete list of maximum
(minimum) normal and shear stresses for all beam elements.
279
283
284
Exercise
23: Cabinet
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308 Project
Description
309
311
310
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
329
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
1
340
2
Create study.
342
3
341
345
4
347
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
368
370
372
374
346
Right-click on the Joint group
folder and select Edit.
348
At each of the eight corners,
there should be either one or two joints,
connecting all of the beams that converge
on that corner. See the figure.
Note
Joints identified as yellow spheres are attached to a single member.
367
Violet color identifies the joints which connect at least two beam
members.
369
The joints can be merged by entering a
user-defined value through Treat as joint for
clearence.
371
373
Click Calculate to update the
joint definitions.
375
Click OK to complete the definition of
the joints.
376
39
1
377
378
380
382
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
5
Tip
Optionally, the joints can also be merged by adding or removing a
beam member. Right-click each joint to examine the components that form the
joint.
379
In the Select Joint Members window, click the components in
the graphics window to add or remove them from the joint.
381
To save the new joint definition, close the Select Joint Members
window. Make sure Keep modified joint on update is selected and click
Calculate.
383
Repeat the procedure for all the joints that need to be merged.
415
Assign materials.
39
2
416
6
418
420
422
423
424
426
7
419
421
Click OK.
Note
under Type.
425
Repeat the definitions of the bonded contacts between the beams and
the skin shells for the right, back, and top sides of the cabinet.
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
447
449
446
Frame Plates
448
Copy all the contacts from the Completed contacts study into
our current study, stress analysis.
451
453
2
455
456
457
458
459
460
3
452
454
Apply a Fixed Geometry fixture
to the cylindrical faces of the four holes in the
Base.
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
Note
We use the Node to Surface formulation here because the parts are
initially touching and we expect little or no sliding between the two bodies.
471
472
4
474
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
475
Make sure to
select Selected direction
to define the force on the
joints.
Note
In mixed mesh analysis the Force can be applied to the faces, edges or
vertices of the solid components or shells, beam joints and along the length of the
beam components.
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
2
Create mesh.
522
524
526
527
528
3
523
parameters: Maximum element size =
111.37mm, Minimum element size = 5mm, Min
number of elements in a circle = 16, and Element
size growth ratio = 1.6. .
525
Make sure that the shell tops and bottoms
are consistent.
Mesh details.
530
532
4
520
521
529
531
Combined mesh with
beams, shells and solids resulted in
approximately 39,200 nodes.
533
5
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
559
558
It can be seen that the maximum von Mises stress in solid and shell
feature, 142.68 MPa, is at a sharp corner. This is an area of singular stress and
can be ignored. There is also some high stress in the vicinity of the holes that
are bonded to the bottom plate(you can verify that both the Top and the
Bottom indicate identical maximum value).
560
561
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
587
2
562
Edit the definition of the stress plot and select Beams. Select
Axial and Bending as the Beam Stress. Select the Render beam
profile option.
586
The highest axial and bending stress plot in beam elements indicate
a maximum stress of 43 MPa. We can therefore conclude that the factor of
safety in strength is approximately 195 MPa/43 MPa = 4.5 (195 MPa is the
yield strength of the Aluminum 5052 H32). This result indicates that the
cabinet frame is designed with sufficient factor of safety.
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
mm.
612
613