Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.1079/PHN2001256
Department of Human Nutrition, University of the North, Pietersburg, South Africa: 2Chronic Diseases of Lifestyle
(CDL) Unit, Medical Research Council, PO Box 19070, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa: 3Department of Medical
Sciences, University of the North, Pietersburg, South Africa: 4Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town,
South Africa: 5Centre for Epidemiological Research in Southern Africa, Medical Research Council, Cape Town,
South Africa: 6Health and Development Group, Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa: 7Health
Systems Research Unit, Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa: 8Centre for Science, Athabasca
University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada
Submitted 9 May 2001: Accepted 15 August 2001
Abstract
Objective: To determine the dietary intake, practices, knowledge and barriers to
dietary compliance of black South African type 2 diabetic patients attending primary
health-care services in urban and rural areas.
Design: A cross-sectional survey. Dietary intake was assessed by three 24-hour recalls,
and knowledge and practices by means of a structured questionnaire (n 133 men,
155 women). In-depth interviews were then conducted with 25 of the patients to
explore their underlying beliefs and feelings with respect to their disease. Trained
interviewers measured weight, height and blood pressure. A fasting venous blood
sample was collected from each participant in order to evaluate glycaemic control.
Setting: An urban area (Sheshego) and rural areas near Pietersburg in the Northern
Province of South Africa.
Subjects: The sample comprised 59 men and 75 women from urban areas and 74 men
and 80 women from rural areas. All were over 40 years of age, diagnosed with type 2
diabetes for at least one year, and attended primary health-care services in the study
area over a 3-month period in 1998.
Results: Reported dietary results indicate that mean energy intakes were low (,70% of
Recommended Dietary Allowance), 8086 8450 kJ day21 and 6967 7382 kJ day21 in
men and women, respectively. Urban subjects had higher P , 0:05 intakes of
animal protein and lower ratios of polyunsaturated fat to saturated fat than rural
subjects. The energy distribution of macronutrients was in line with the
recommendations for a prudent diet, with fat intake less than 30%, saturated fat
less than 10% and carbohydrate intake greater than 55% of total energy intake. In most
respects, nutrient intakes resembled a traditional African diet, although fibre intake
was low in terms of the recommended 36 g/1000 kJ. More than 90% of patients ate
three meals a day, yet only 32 47% had a morning snack and 1927% had a late
evening snack. The majority of patients indicated that they followed a special diet,
which had been given to them by a doctor or a nurse. Only 3.46.1% were treated by
diet alone. Poor glycaemic control was found in both urban and rural participants,
with more than half of subjects having fasting plasma glucose above 8 mmol l21 and
more than 35% having plasma glycosylated haemoglobin level above 8.6%. High
triglyceride levels were found in 24 to 25% of men and in 17 to 18% of women.
Obesity (body mass index $30 kg m22) was prevalent in 15 to 16% of men compared
with 35 to 47% of women; elevated blood pressure ($160/95 mmHg) was least
prevalent in rural women (25.9%) and most prevalent in urban men (42.4%).
Conclusions: The majority of black, type 2 diabetic patients studied showed poor
glycaemic control. Additionally, many had dyslipidaemia, were obese and/or had an
elevated blood pressure. Quantitative and qualitative findings indicated that these patients
frequently received incorrect and inappropriate dietary advice from health educators.
Keywords
Black South Africans
Diabetes mellitus
Non-insulin-dependent
diet therapy
Diet therapy
330
G Nthangeni et al.
331
332
Table 1 Mean energy (SD) and macronutrient intakes in type 2 diabetic patients in the study
Nutrients
Urban men
n 59
Rural men
n 74
Urban/rural
Wilcoxon
P-value
Urban women
n 75
Rural women
n 82
Urban/rural
Wilcoxon
P-value
Energy (kJ)
Protein (g)
Plant protein (g)
Animal protein (g)
Total fibre (g)
Insoluble fibre (g)
Soluble fibre (g)
Total carbohydrate (g)
Total sugar (g)
Added sugar (g)
Cholesterol (mg)
Fat (g)
Saturated fat (g)
Monounsaturated fat (g)
Polyunsaturated fat (g)
P/S ratio
Alcohol (g)
Total protein as % energy
Plant protein as % energy
Animal protein as % energy
Total fat as % energy
Saturated fat as % energy
Monounsaturated fat as % energy
Polyunsaturated fat as % energy
Carbohydrate as % energy
Added sugar as % energy
Alcohol as % energy
8449 (1881)
75 (18.1)
44 (12.6)
31 (14.0)
21 (6.3)
2.5 (1.6)
2.0 (1.3)
336 (83.7)
15 (10.6)
2.6 (5.2)
118 (77.9)
30 (11.3)
7.6 (4.0)
10.2 (5.1)
8.1 (4.0)
1.2 (0.5)
1.9 (9.0)
15.1 (2.6)
8.6 (1.2)
6.4 (4.4)
13.6 (4.6)
3.4 (1.8)
4.7 (2.3)
3.7 (1.2)
66.4 (5.4)
3.1 (2.4)
1.1 (5.0)
8086 (1906)
70 (21.6)
43 (11.2)
26 (18.4)
21 (6.8)
2.7 (2.1)
2.3 (2.5)
322 (79.5)
12 (12.0)
3.8 (11.0)
114 (102.5)
29 (12.9)
7.1 (4.4)
9.3 (5.1)
8.1 (4.0)
1.4 (0.7)
0.4 (2.3)
14.4 (2.7)
9.0 (1.2)
5.3 (3.3)
13.3 (4.5)
3.3 (1.7)
4.3 (1.8)
3.8 (1.7)
67.0 (5.7)
2.6 (2.7)
0.3 (1.9)
0.29
0.07
0.80
0.018*
0.47
0.95
0.54
0.31
0.10
0.79
0.27
0.33
0.27
0.22
0.60
0.27
0.45
0.12
0.07
0.046*
0.72
0.46
0.57
0.71
0.39
0.08
0.45
7381 (1894)
65 (22.3)
39 (12.6)
26 (18.6)
21 (8.6)
2.6 (1.6)
2.2 (1.6)
288 (74.3)
16 (10.8)
4.0 (7.2)
126 (118.7)
28 (12.8)
7.2 (5.1)
9.0 (5.0)
7.4 (3.2)
1.3 (0.6)
0.9 (4.4)
14.7 (2.9)
8.9 (1.4)
5.8 (3.7)
14.0 (4.3)
3.6 (2.1)
4.5 (1.8)
3.8 (1.1)
65.9 (5.8)
3.8 (2.9)
0.8 (5.7)
6967 (1816)
59 (17.5)
39 (12.4)
20 (13.4)
19 (6.7)
3.1 (1.7)
2.3 (1.7)
274 (81.5)
14 (11.8)
2.1 (5.1)
105 (92.6)
27 (11.3)
6.1 (3.4)
8.9 (4.7)
8.2 (3.6)
1.5 (0.6)
0.9 (4.5)
14.3 (2.6)
9.2 (1.2)
4.9 (3.1)
14.8 (5.6)
3.4 (1.8)
4.9 (2.4)
4.5 (1.8)
65.7 (6.3)
3.5 (3.3)
0.8 (4.1)
0.19
0.15
0.85
0.09
0.50
0.07
0.54
0.24
0.13
0.18
0.38
0.82
0.36
0.93
0.12
0.019*
0.76
0.73
0.037*
0.29
0.60
0.57
0.43
0.015*
0.84
0.37
0.77
*, P , 0:05.
P/S: ratio of polyunsaturated fats to saturated fats.
G Nthangeni et al.
333
Table 2 Food items most commonly consumed by type 2 diabetics in the study, as derived from three 24-hour recalls
Urban men
n 59
Rural men
n 74
Urban women
n 75
Rural women
n 80
Food
Mean (g)
SD
Mean (g)
SD
Chi-square
P-value
Mean (g)
SD
Mean (g)
SD
Chi-square
P-value
Brown bread
Maize porridge
Tea (Ceylon)
Sorghum porridge
Chicken
Beef
Milk
Apple
Cabbage
Tea (herbal)
Spinach
Oranges
92
75
66
66
76
36
28
31
25
22
20
20
145
721
303
671
94
80
165
163
109
281
208
174
66
138
136
159
31
40
100
51
52
93
77
59
86
82
81
76
76
22
30
23
50
18
39
27
152
723
278
616
99
96
99
137
114
242
116
205
56
218
87
184
33
41
23
26
79
35
48
52
0.507
0.782
0.914
0.097
0.784
0.155
0.174
0.121
0.815
0.332
0.000*
0.193
93
87
59
69
72
24
25
40
27
47
31
47
128
597
284
560
96
70
171
136
86
314
136
184
58
174
81
203
38
43
139
31
32
103
84
62
90
76
75
79
69
16
23
30
38
30
29
35
135
584
337
596
100
108
133
146
101
310
130
168
56
195
167
146
45
114
105
24
61
107
53
64
0.317
0.811
0.390
0.143
0.783
0.155
0.180
0.203
0.598
0.883
0.602
0.317
*, P , 0:05.
Urban men
n 59 (%)
Rural men
n 74 (%)
Urban women
n 75 (%)
Rural women
n 80 (%)
P-value
78
56.1
15.8
22.8
3.5
0
32.7
83.8
71.6
8.1
12.2
1.4
0
41.9
0.39
0.06
0.17
0.11
0.58
0.71
0.22
78.7
63.5
4.1
18.9
1.4
0
34
79.3
57
14.3
27.3
3.9
1.2
39
0.92
0.4
0.03*
0.22
0.62
0.69
0.24
8.7
55.9
35.6
16.2
55.4
28.4
0.34
18.7
56
25.3
13.4
59.8
26.8
0.83
64.4
8.5
44.1
30.5
27.1
20.3
5.1
60.8
2.7
43.2
10.8
23
20.3
4.1
0.67
0.13
0.92
0.004*
0.58
0.99
0.77
52
14.7
40
24
21.3
22.7
6.7
47.6
11
36.6
20.8
7.3
26.7
2.4
0.57
0.48
0.66
0.62
0.011*
0.62
0.21
25.3
14.7
58.7
29.3
11
59.8
12
9.3
77.3
17.1
18.3
64.6
0.62
0.62
0.78
0.26
0.42
56
41.3
25.3
16
5.3
56.1
28.1
24.4
18.3
10.9
0.99
0.08
0.89
0.71
0.24
0.829
0.342
0.167
0.578
0.697
52
48
21.3
9.3
5.3
31.7
22
6.1
9.8
6.1
0.010*
0.001*
0.005*
0.92
0.55
P-value
0.144
0.581
0.007*
0.007*
Weet Bix
Oranges
Bananas
Oranges
Green apples
Whole milk
White rice
Whiskey
* Some patients had been told to eat the foods and some not to eat them.
White bread
Maize porridge
Mashed potatoes
Sweet potatoes
Red apples
Sweet fruits (e.g. grapes)
Mangoes
Watermelon
Papaw
Beer
Carbonated cold drinks
Mageu (fermented maize beverage)
Alcohol
Sweets and confectionery
Salty foods
Tripe and intestines
Sugar
From questionnaires
Sorghum porridge
Brown rice
Brown bread
Vegetables without sugar (except potatoes)
Fruit (except specified fruits)
Red meat cooked without fat
Chicken without skin
Fish cooked without fat
Boiled eggs
Tinned fish
Peanut butter
Low-fat milk
Cheese
Yoghurt
Fruit juice
Diet cold drinks
Artificially sweetened tea
Sorghum porridge
Brown rice
Brown bread
Cabbage
Peaches one per day
Oranges one per day
Green apples
Low-fat milk
Diet cold drinks
Saccharine
White bread
Maize porridge
White rice
Foods with starch
Red apples
Grapes
Mangoes
Bananas
Papaw
Potatoes
Sweet potatoes
Whole milk
Alcohol
Sweets and confectionery
Salt
Tripe and intestines
Sugar and jam
Fried eggs
Foods to be avoided
G Nthangeni et al.
Foods recommended
Table 4 Foods diabetic patients had been advised to eat and/or not to eat, as obtained from a questionnaire n 288 and by in-depth interviews n 25
334
335
Table 5 Meal patterns and alcohol consumption of type 2 diabetic patients studied
Meals
Breakfast, % (number)
Morning snack, % (number)
Lunch, % (number)
Afternoon snack, % (number)
Dinner, % (number)
Evening snack, % (number)
Number of meals, mean (SD)
Number of foods per snack period
Morning snack, mean (SD)
Afternoon snack, mean (SD)
Evening snack, mean (SD)
Regular alcohol consumption
On weekdays, % (number)
On weekends, % (number)
Urban men
n 59
Rural men
n 74
Chi-square
P-value
Urban women
n 75
Rural women
n 80
Chi-square
P-value
100 (59)
42.4 (25)
100 (59)
55.9 (33)
100 (59)
27.1 (16)
4.3 (1.0)
97.3 (72)
37.8 (28)
93.2 (69)
48.6 (36)
100 (74)
21.6 (16)
4.0 (1.1)
0.50
0.59
0.06
0.40
0.46
0.16
100 (75)
46.7 (35)
100 (75)
65.3 (49)
100 (75)
24.0 (18)
4.4 (1)
98.8 (79)
32.1 (26)
92.6 (75)
44.4 (36)
98.8 (79)
18.5 (15)
3.9 (0.9)
0.07
0.06
0.01*
0.42
0.001*
2.5 (1.6)
1.8 (1.0)
0.6 (1.9)
2.0 (1.4)
1.8 (1.2)
1.4 (0.7)
0.22
0.62
0.73
2.5 (1.6)
2.2 (1.7)
1.2 (0.5)
2.0 (1.5)
1.5 (0.8)
1.9 (1.9)
0.20
0.03*
0.21
17.0 (10)
25.4 (15)
16.2 (12)
17.6 (13)
0.91
0.26
1.3 (1)
4.0 (3)
4.9 (4)
6.1 (5)
0.36
0.72
*, P , 0:05.
336
G Nthangeni et al.
Table 6 Percentage of type 2 diabetic patients with abnormal blood values, obesity and hypertension, and their medication usage
Blood variable
Glucose
.7 mmol l21*
.8 mmol l21
HbA1c
.7%*
.8.6%
Triglycerides
$2 mmol l21*
$2.2 mmol l21
Total cholesterol
$5 mmol l21*
$6.5 mmol l21
HDL-C
#1.2 mmol l21*
,0.9 mmol l21
LDL-C
$3 mmol l21
BMI$30 kg m22
Blood pressure
$140/90 mmHg*
$160/95 mmHg
Medication
OHGA
Insulin
Other
Urban men
n 57
Rural men
n 73
Chi-square
P-value
Urban women
n 74
Rural women
n 80
Chi-square
P- value
62.1
60.8
74.0
59.2
0.14
0.22
72.2
67.1
67.1
65.4
0.49
0.88
56.9
39.7
69.9
42.5
0.12
0.05
59.7
38.9
66.7
37.0
0.37
0.39
25.9
24.1
28.4
24.7
0.79
0.95
18.9
17.5
23.2
17.0
0.45
0.94
39.0
5.2
41.1
11.0
0.81
0.49
30.0
14.9
54.9
9.8
0.52
0.25
35.6
0
30.1
0
0.51
0
37.8
0
25.0
0
0.09
0
35.1
15.3
41.7
16.2
0.45
0.85
63.5
46.7
56.8
35.4
0.39
0.15
76.3
42.4
64.9
33.3
0.32
0.24
62.7
33.0
54.9
25.9
0.34
0.37
67.8
27.1
5.1
66.2
27.0
6.8
0.99
96.0
2.7
6.7
92.7
4.9
2.4
0.68
Reference values: *, Working Group of the National Diabetes Advisory Board (SEMDSA)8; , Society for Endocrinal Metabolism and Diabetes of Southern
Africa24.
OHGA oral hypoglycaemic agents.
337
7
8
9
10
Recommendations
It is recommended that a culturally appropriate dietary
intervention programme be developed for black type 2
diabetic patients. This should include a diet plan that is
based on the traditional staple foods maize and/or
sorghum, and be spaced throughout the day in wellbalanced portion sizes. Patients should be encouraged to
increase their fibre intake, e.g. by including legumes,
which are culturally acceptable and have a low glycaemic
index40. Additionally, patients need to be given accurate
dietary and lifestyle information on their disease from
doctors and nurses since they are the main nutrition
educators. This may require that health professionals be
retrained in the concepts of an optimal diabetic diet which
is culturally and economically acceptable to black patients.
11
12
13
14
15
16
Acknowledgements
17
18
19
20
21
22
338
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
G Nthangeni et al.
Friedewald WT, Levy RJ, Frederickson DS. Estimation of the
concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in
plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin.
Chem. 1972; 18: 499 502.
Society for Endocrinal Metabolism and Diabetes of Southern
Africa. Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes at Primary Care Level.
Johannesburg: Servier, 1999.
Lipid and Atherosclerosis Society of Southern Africa Working
Group. Diagnosis, management and prevention of the
common dyslipidaemias in South Africa clinical guidelines, 2000. S. Afr. Med. J. 2000; 90: 164 77.
Raubenheimer PJ, Levitt NS. What is good control in diabetes
mellitus? Cont. Med. Educ. 2000; 18: 915 8.
Mahan LK, Escott-Stump S. Krauses Food, Nutrition, and
Diet Therapy, 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders
Company, 2000.
World Health Organization (WHO). Arterial Hypertension.
Report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Technical Reports
Series No. 628. Geneva: WHO, 1978.
American Heart Association (AHA). Dietary guidelines for
healthy American adults. Position statement. Circulation
1988; 77: 721A 4A.
Steyn NP, Burger S, Monyeki KD, Alberts M, Nthangeni G.
Seasonal Variation in Dietary Intake of the Adult Population
of Dikgale. Sovenga: University of the North, 1999.
Steyn NP, Senekal M, Brits S, Nel JH. Urban and rural
differences in dietary intake, weight status and nutrition
knowledge of black female students. Asia Pacific J. Clin.
Nutr. 2000; 9: 53 8.
Steyn NP, MacIntyre UE, Olwagon R, Albert M. Validation of
multiple 24-hour recalls in a rural adult population using
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40