You are on page 1of 7

The incoherence of the incoherence

Ibrahim Amellal
27 septembre 2016

The clarity is well-dosed repartition of shadow and light


Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Abstract

The main reason why I read this article, is to undestand something that
Ive never understood in quantum physics. Its was the phenom of diffraction
and the wave-particule duality of the light and the conecpt of photon. Thats
why we proposed a determinst theory to represent these phenomens.

Quanta
I think I can safely that nobody understands quantum mechanics
Richarrd Feynman
So lets change it Ibrahim Amellal

Lets besgin by the photoelectric effect very famous, Einstein obtained


the Nobel prize in 1921 for his works.
He claims that the light transports energy with particule photon on the
particules. The fact that energy is brought discretly means that they are
discret particles. We know too that the light is diffsued by quanta, unit of
light. And to confuse me still far, the Heisenbergs principe claim that its
impossible to know the position and momentum arguing with the Young
slots while physics say that the photon havent mass because nothing can
have the speed of the light.
Lets go directly to the solution, a photon is not a particle, a electromagnetic quanta is a period of an eletromagnetic wave and a photon is a
quanta and the energy of the light is distribued continuously.
So, take a carpet with dust. The fines dust particles are encrusted in the
carpet and his meshs. How clean it without vacuum and with wall ? Aspirate dust with mouth ? Probably no. Shake it. But what a shake ? You move
the carpet in one direction and you alternate the sense. The movement will
spread by the concept called wave.
Have we send particle until the dust particle ? No. The wave transports
the energy until dust. And if will expel the dust with a great efficience, what
should we do ? Every cleaning worker knows by practice the photoelectric effect on macroscopic scale. Move by slow and even giant amplitude will move
no particle of dust but you should shake the carpet with short frequence,
alternate vigorously. When the wave on the carpet is enough powerful, the
dust leave the carpet. The energy depends of the frequency of the carpet
wave too. But in practice, its very difficult thus ... people hit the carpet
on sur wall and and the force produced by the wall overlap with the carpet
wave and expel the particles of dust out.
The dusted carpet example shows us that we can send energy without
send particle in the direction of the wave. A alternative linear movement
produces a wave orthogonally.

With the light, each time that we shake the eletrcon, his sends a quanta or a photon, call it how you will. The quanta have no mass, its not an
object, and its coherent with youngs slots. Its discret, we can count the
number of waves sent and the speed, the frequence and this phenomen is
observable at our macroscopic scale.
So whats the light ? A electromagnetic wave sent in a range of frequence
and a wave of length (400 to 700 nm). Our eyes transform the electromagnetic wave is electric signals. If the length of wave is too short, the energy
of the wave is too short, the eye can transform it, and for more porweful,
the eye is too weak to deal with it. No proof that light is a flow of particles,
and the fact that a particle can move a the speed of light infirm the theory
of particles. A full-wave theory is sustainable and this theory is coherent.
Can we explain the Young slots ? Yes.
So, now I can understand what I didnt. The diffraction.
How the the light or any other waves whose pass through a small slot,
smaller than the wave of length can change the movement.
So illustrate with a picture 1

How explain diffraction without photons ?

1. http ://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Red3kx4ddLw/TUjWiAiR7hI/AAAAAAAAAUE/se0xEEvSRy4/s1600/Diffractionp

And why its depends about the wavelength whose the movement is perpendicular, how can the small slot filter ? For example, if i stand up on a
train like in the film, I will hit the tunnel only if the height of the train and
mine are greater than the tunnels height, we dont care about the length of
the wagon.
So lets see what a electromagnetic wave with a picture 2

In fact, I think, just a part of the quanta can pass through the slot
and the a part of the energy is lost in the slot. Fine ? No, remember that we
assume that the energy depends only about frequency. How ?
Its again a phenomen known by rugbymen, artillerymen, worker ...
In a 3 dimensional world we have 3 directions for energy spreading. But
we have a constraint, thus we lose one degree of freedom. Lets see :

E(x, y, z)

E(x) =

f (x)
E(y) = f (y)

E(z) = f (z)

But we know that r2 = x2 +y 2 , so we speak about torsional energy and


frontal energy. For example, a rugbymen passes the ball at his colleague.
If he move just the shoulder to throw the ball, the ball will fall quickly but
if he create a spin on the ball with the hands, the ball will move like a shell
and more far.
2. http ://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/imgel2/emwavec.gif

The wave have two energy :


1. Torsionnal energy whose depends only about frequence. 2. Frontal
energy whose depends about the amplitude.
These energy produces movement in the orthogonal direction compared
to their movements.
If I shot an object with a FN SCAR that I havent. The frontal energy
will push the object and the torsionnal will screw the body.
The fact is the frequency can increase easily than the amplitude, thus,
physicist thought and think that the energy depends only of the frequency.
I think, its false, if we can produce waves with so big amplitude ... it will
eject the electron, but increases the frequence by 106 , its very easy but the
amplitude ... may be were not able to confirm.
So return about the slot, what was the problem ? Shot photon by photon and we concluded that we cant know the position of the photon.
In an all-wave theory, how to explain ? The wave have period, so its
like an clock, if the slot is a quart of the wavelength, 3 hours of the wave
will pass and 9 hours will be blocked by the slot, but its frontal energy
and we have seen that its very small. So the wave pass in the thin slot and
bounce and after exit the slot in one direction.
So what was the problem ? Like with Bali balo in space, when we approach, we create physical interference and we obtain a biased result. Can
we know by which slot pass the photon ? Yes, just put a black film on the
two slots, and look which shine.
So and for the electron ? That will be the topic of the next article.

Conclusion

We disturb the system that we study even with so small interferences


and for the microscopic objects, theyre more sensitive to our interferences
but as we can see, we can retrieve the same physicals concepts.

You might also like