Professional Documents
Culture Documents
h i g h l i g h t s
g r a p h i c a l
a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 January 2013
Received in revised form 18 February 2013
Accepted 3 March 2013
Available online 19 March 2013
Keywords:
Biochemical composition
Pigments
Carbohydrates
Proteins
Lipids
a b s t r a c t
Biochemical compositional analysis of microbial biomass is a useful tool that can provide insight into the
behaviour of an organism and its adaptational response to changes in its environment. To some extent,
it reects the physiological and metabolic status of the organism. Conventional methods to estimate
biochemical composition often employ different sample pretreatment strategies and analytical steps for
analysing each major component, such as total proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids, making it labour-,
time- and sample-intensive. Such analyses when carried out individually can also result in uncertainties
of estimates as different pre-treatment or extraction conditions are employed for each of the component
estimations and these are not necessarily standardised for the organism, resulting in observations that
are not easy to compare within the experimental set-up or between laboratories. We recently reported a
method to estimate total lipids in microalgae (Chen, Vaidyanathan, Anal. Chim. Acta, 724, 6772). Here,
we propose a unied method for the simultaneous estimation of the principal biological components,
proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, chlorophyll and carotenoids, in a single microalgae culture sample that
incorporates the earlier published lipid assay. The proposed methodology adopts an alternative strategy
for pigment assay that has a high sensitivity. The unied assay is shown to conserve sample (by 79%), time
(67%), chemicals (34%) and energy (58%) when compared to the corresponding assay for each component,
carried out individually on different samples. The method can also be applied to other microorganisms,
especially those with recalcitrant cell walls.
2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Biochemical composition of cells that includes pigments, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids can provide a valuable indication of
the physiology and metabolic status of an organism. The response of
Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 0114 222 7526; fax: +44 0114 222 7501.
E-mail address: s.vaidyanathan@shefeld.ac.uk (S. Vaidyanathan).
0003-2670/$ see front matter 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2013.03.005
32
2. Experimental
All the solvents and chemicals used were from SigmaAldrich,
unless specied otherwise.
2.1. Microalgae cultivation and harvest
N. salina and D. salina were selected as the model microalgae.
They were obtained from the Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP, UK) and grown in the f/2 medium (recipe from CCAP)
[20]. Stock cultures were grown in 1 L Erlenmeyer ask placed on a
shaking platform at 25 C with 12 h light/dark cycles. For biochemical compositional analysis by using the proposed method, 1.5 mL of
the microalgae culture at different stages of growth (OD of 0.051.5)
were harvested by centrifugation (3000 g for 10 min) and the cell
pellets were stored frozen at 20 C until analysis.
2.2. Reference pigment assay
Cellular pigments were determined using a spectrophotometric
method after extraction with 80% acetone [8,21]. Briey, a 2 mL
aliquot of culture was harvested, washed twice with distilled water
and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended in 0.4 mL of 0.1 M
phosphate buffer (pH = 7) and disrupted by bead-beating using a
cell disruptor (DISRUPTOR GENIE , USA) for 10 min. 1.6 mL of pure
acetone was added to form an 80% acetone solution, vigorously
vortexed for 2 min and incubated in the dark for 15 min. After centrifugation, the supernatant was decanted to read the absorbance in
a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 2100 pro, Thomas Scientic, USA).
Subsequently, the amount of pigments was calculated using the
formulae (1)(3) [8]:
Ca = 12.21A663 2.81A646
(1)
Cb = 20.13A646 5.03A663
(2)
Ct =
(3)
33
Scheme 1. Proposed combined assay for total pigments, carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. Chl a/b: chlorophyll a/b; Car: carbohydrates; Pro: proteins; Polys: polysaccharides;
Tc : total carotenoids.
34
Fig. 1. Spectra of saponied chlorophylls (a) in aqueous phase and total carotenoids (b) in organic phase. The inset in (a) shows the structure of Mg-Rchln a/b, where R is
methyl group in Mg-Rchln a and formyl group in Mg-Rchln b.
been able to utilise the major peaks of Mg-Rchln a/b at 416 nm and
453 nm, as a result of the extraction procedure adopted here, where
the carotenoids are partitioned in the organic phase and hence do
not interfere. The choice of the stronger peaks at 416 and 453 nm
enables higher sensitivities to be achieved for the determination of
chlorophylls, as shown in Fig. 2, with little or no interference from
carotenoids.
Serial dilutions of N. salina and D. salina samples were saponied
in R1 and used to establish a correlation between the absorbance at
416 nm and 453 nm and chlorophylls determined by the reference
method. As can be seen from Fig. 2a, a strongly linear relationship can be observed. The slopes of the correlation for chlorophyll
a from N. salina at 416 nm and 453 nm were directly taken as the
extinction coefcients of chlorophyll a at 416 nm and 453 nm (E416a
and E453a ) because N. salina is known to have only chlorophyll a. It
needs to be pointed out that, in D. salina, the absorbance of chlorophyll a at 416 nm contains the contribution from chlorophyll b
and the absorbance of chlorophyll b at 453 nm contains the contribution from chlorophyll a. Consequently, E416a and E453a derived
from the N. salina spectra were used to calculate the absorbance of
chlorophyll a in D. salina at 416 nm and 453 nm, based on the reference method estimations. The calculated chlorophyll a absorbance
was then subtracted from the observed absorbance of D. salina at
the two wavelengths (416 nm and 453 nm), in order to remove
the interference from chlorophyll a and calculate the extinction
coefcients of chlorophyll b at 416 nm and 453 nm (E416b and E453b ).
Fig. 2. Spectral sensitivity to chlorophylls. (a) Absorbance of chlorophyll a and b in N. salina and D. salina at different wavelengths as a function of chlorophyll concentration;
(b) relationship of the predicted chlorophylls using the present coefcient equations and the chlorophylls estimated using the 80% acetone method [8,21]; (c) test limitation
of 0.025 g mL1 for both chlorophylls is encircled in the inset.
35
Table 1
Comparison of extinction coefcients at corresponding wavelengths among different methods. ad are the corresponding extinction coefcients (g mL1 ).
Method
a/b
d/c
Present method
Porras method [9]
80% acetone [8]
Chloroform [8]
Methanol [8]
Diethyl-ether [8]
Dimethyl-formamide [8]
Dimethyl-sulphoxide [8]
0.1571
0.0611
0.0869
0.0946
0.0793
0.101
0.0904
0.0881
0.0212
0.0063
0.0121
0.0069
0.0215
0.0048
0.0117
0.0138
0.0064
0.0162
0.0217
0.0264
0.0329
0.0194
0.0197
0.0213
0.1711
0.0218
0.0527
0.063
0.0459
0.062
0.0506
0.0488
7.41
9.69
7.18
13.65
3.69
21.26
7.74
6.37
26.73
1.35
2.43
2.39
1.4
3.2
2.57
2.29
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
B2 = c Ca + d Cb
(10)
36
Fig. 3. Correlation of absorbance at three wavelengths (a), and spectral difference at the given wavelengths (b) with total carotenoid concentration (Tc ), estimated by the
reference method, in serial dilutions of N. salina.
Schneegurts method [22], before reaction with anthrone the carbohydrates were extracted by a hot KOH solution followed by cold
precipitation of carbohydrates before colour development. Nevertheless, recent estimation approaches appear to gloss over the
extraction procedure [4,15,39]. In these studies, there is no reference to sample pretreatment such as physical lysis, except washing
the cell pellets before conducting the assay. For instance, Laurens
et al. [39] employed the phenol-sulphuric acid method to estimate
the carbohydrates in the water-resuspended biomass. It appears
that the sample with intact cells can be directly applied to the carbohydrate assay given the digestion by the concentrated sulphuric
acid. However, it is unclear whether a separate extraction approach
before colour formation would have made a difference or not. Evidently, the success of the method depends on the sample material
and the effectiveness of the employed methodology in reproducibly
extracting the carbohydrates. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the
kind of treatment required for a given sample. Scheme 2 illustrates
the six treatments that we examined in this investigation, including the hot alkaline extraction method adopted by Schneegurt [22].
All the samples were subsequently subjected to the carbohydrate
assay using the anthrone-sulphuric acid method.
The results of the pre-treatment are compared in Fig. 4a. It
can be observed that the original culture sample without any pretreatment yielded the maximum absorbance. This either indicates
that there are extracellular carbohydrates in the medium that
are detected, in addition to intracellular carbohydrates, or that
the method is inuenced by media components giving an overestimation. After a wash step, the medium was substituted by
distilled water and the measured carbohydrate content decreased.
Lysis of cells with the help of glass beads led to a higher carbohydrate content than water-washed cell pellets. This illustrates
that more carbohydrates were released by the physical grinding
of glass beads. The saponication step appears to reduce the carbohydrate level to similar levels observed in the washed pellets.
Table 2
Formulae for total carotenoids at different wavelength, y: absorbance; x: concentration (g mL1 ). The value of is the difference of two slopes divided by their average, i.e.,
= (S1 S2 )/0.5*(S1 + S2 ), S1 and S2 are the two comparing slopes.
Wavelength (nm)
A430
A450
A480
A450430
Average
A480430
Average
N. salina
D. salina
2
Formula
Formula
y = 0.096x
y = 0.1364x
y = 0.1258x
y = 0.0404x
0.9835
0.9831
0.9818
0.9806
y = 0.1189x
y = 0.1634x
y = 0.1481x
y = 0.0445x
0.9562
0.9585
0.9603
0.9636
0.213
0.18
0.163
0.096
y = 0.0298x
0.9729
y = 0.0292x
0.9713
0.02
y = 0.0425x
y = 0.0295x
37
Scheme 2. Pre-treatment methods examined prior to anthrone sulphuric acid estimation of carbohydrates. Sample numbers indicated correspond to the ones used in Fig. 4a.
Fig. 4. Effects of different pre-treatment on the assay of carbohydrates (triplicate determinations). (a) Total carbohydrate in the same samples by different treatment (for
details refer to Scheme 2). (b) Carbohydrate proportion in supernatant and pellet from samples subjected to water-washing (H2 O), lysis in R1 reagent (R1) and saponication
(R1 + Sap.), respectively.
38
Fig. 6. (a) Effect of saponication time on the assay of proteins (triplicate determinations); (b) correlation between known and estimated protein concentrations.
39
Table 3
Comparison of consumptions for analysing ten samples in terms of time, material and cost between the proposed method and the individual methods. P represents the GBP
pounds. Cost estimation was on the basis of the UK rates of chemicals and electricity, as on 5th November, 2012.
Assays
Sample (mL)
Time (h)
Chemicals (P)
Energy (P)
Method
Pigments
Carbohydrates
Proteins
Lipids
Sub-total
Simultaneous
Conservation %
2.00
1.50
2.00
1.50
7.00
1.50
78.57
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
12.00
4.00
66.67
0.59
0.43
0.32
0.39
1.73
1.14
34.15
0.09
0.08
0.14
0.18
0.49
0.21
58.18
Fig. 7. Growth curve and biochemical composition in N. salina (left) and D. salina
(right). (a) Yields of biomass (dry weight), carbohydrate (Car), protein (Pro) and
lipid (Lip); (b) percentage content of carbohydrate, protein and lipid in the basis of
biomass; (c) yields of chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b) and total carotenoids
(Tc ).
40
[16] O. Classics Lowry, N. Rosebrough, A. Farr, R. Randall, J. Biol. Chem. 193 (1951)
265.
[17] T. Zor, Z. Selinger, Anal. Biochem. 236 (1996) 302.
[18] T. Rausch, Hydrobiologia 78 (1981) 237.
[19] Y. Chen, S. Vaidyanathan, Anal. Chim. Acta 724 (2012) 67.
[20] C. F/2 medium. Accessed from http://www.ccap.ac.uk/media/documents/f2.pdf
[21] J. Kirk, Planta 78 (1967) 200.
[22] M.A. Schneegurt, D.M. Sherman, S. Nayar, L.A. Sherman, J. Bacteriol. 176 (1994)
1586.
[23] X.-P. Liu, T.E. Grams, R. Matyssek, H. Rennenberg, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 43
(2005) 147.
[24] W. Zwerschke, B. Mannhardt, P. Massimi, S. Nauenburg, D. Pim, W. Nickel, L.
Banks, A.J. Reuser, P. Jansen-Drr, J. Biol. Chem. 275 (2000) 9534.
[25] R. Itzhaki, D. Gill, Anal. Biochem. 9 (1964) 401.
[26] L.M. Lubin, O. Montero, I. Moreno-Garrido, I.E. Huertas, C. Sobrino, M.
Gonzlez-del Valle, G. Pars, J. Appl. Phycol. 12 (2000) 249.
[27] J.S. Brown, Plant Physiol. 83 (1987) 434.
[28] W. Chen, N. Jin, Y. Shi, Y. Su, B. Fei, W. Li, D. Qiao, Y. Cao, Photosynthetica 48
(2010) 355.
[29] J.P. Yuan, F. Chen, J. Agric. Food Chem. 46 (1998) 3371.
[30] G. Lietz, C. Henry, Food Chem. 60 (1997) 109.
[31] M. Dubois, K. Gilles, J. Hamilton, P. Rebers, F. Smith, Nature 168 (1951)
167.
[32] M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P. Rebers, F. Smith, Anal. Chem. 28 (1956)
350.
[33] R. Dreywood, Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 18 (1946) 499.
[34] J.F. Robyt, S. Bemis, Anal. Biochem. 19 (1967) 56.
[35] D. Liu, P. Wong, B. Dutka, Water Res. 7 (1973) 741.
[36] F.J. Viles Jr., L. Silverman, Anal. Chem. 21 (1949) 950.
[37] S. Seifter, S. Dayton, B. Novic, E. Muntwyler, Arch. Biochem. 25 (1950) 191.
[38] E. Yemm, A. Willis, Biochem. J. 57 (1954) 508.
[39] L.M.L. Laurens, T.A. Dempster, H.D.T. Jones, E.J. Wolfrum, S. Van Wychen, J.S.P.
McAllister, M. Rencenberger, K.J. Parchert, L.M. Gloe, Anal. Chem. 84 (2012)
1879.
[40] S.I. Ogata, K.O. Lloyd, Anal. Biochem. 119 (1982) 351.
[41] T. Nakajima, C.E. Ballou, J. Biol. Chem. 249 (1974) 7679.
[42] C. Degani, M. Halmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90 (1968) 1313.
[43] M. Rebolloso-Fuentes, A. Navarro-Perez, F. Garcia-Camacho, J. Ramos-Miras, J.
Guil-Guerrero, J. Agric. Food Chem. 49 (2001) 2966.
[44] A. Singh, S.I. Olsen, Appl. Energy 88 (2011) 3548.