MARKING SCHEME TRIAL PAPER 2 SPM 2016

SECTION A

0
11

3
1

4
1

SECTION B

16. JomBekpes!
17. underprivileged students (students is mandatory)
18. homeless people
19. Datuk Seri HishamuddinTun Hussein
20. Institut Onn Jaafar / IOJ
21. Yayasan Chow Kit / YCK
22. provide breakfast to the less fortunate (less fortunate is mandatory)
23. once a fortnight /first and third Wednesdays every month
24. From 7 a.m. (from is mandatory)
25. 346, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman / outside KL Krash Pad at 346, Jalan Tuanku Abdul
Rahman

SECTION C
26
27
28
29

30

a)
b)
a)
b)
a)
a)
b)

they were not understood by their parents

parents are old-fashioned squares who cannot understand youths of today
To show their love (for their children)
Their childs happiness
Old-fashioned/ they have not moved with the times
Not impressed/no-reaction
Lack judgement
The child has failed to prove that he is grown up enough to be trusted/ he has lied about
where he has been or with whom
Their judgment is controlled by prejudice / situations are misread and condemned
unreasonably

Summary writing : Marks are awarded as follow:

Content

: 10 marks

Language : 5 marks
Total

: 15 marks

Content points for summary

1.

of their love for their children / they love their children

2.

they desire their teenagers happiness

3.

interested in their welfare

4.

parents intentions are ood (irrespective of what teenagers think of their ideas)

5.

when giving advice, parents talk from experience

6.

they have been through the teens themselves

7.

experience has taught them how to overcome their problems

8.

they remember (how it all started and) where people went wrong

9.

they wish to save their teenagers from committing similar mistakes

10.

they use their experience to protect their child

11.

from others who would endanger their faith / morals / happiness

12.

teenagers should act like an adult if they want to be treated as one

13.

they should not lie

14.

they should be careful over their choice of friends

15.

they should show interest in their religious duties

SUMMARY: CRITERIA FOR STYLE AND PRESENTATION

MAR
K

PARAPHRASE

MARK USE OF ENGLISH

A sustained attempt to re-phrase

text.
Expression
is
secure.
Allowance given for phrases /
words lifted from text that are
difficult to substitute

Very occasional first draft slips.

Language is accurate. Varied
sentence structures. Use of
original
complex
syntax.
Punctuation and spelling accurate.

A noticeable attempt to re-phrase

text. Free from stretches of
concentrated lifting. Expression
generally sound.

Language almost always accurate.

Isolated serious errors. Some
varied structures. Sentences may
include original complex syntax.
Punctuation and spelling nearly
always accurate.

Language almost always accurate.

Isolated serious errors. Some varied
structures. Sentences may include
original
complex
syntax.
Punctuation and spelling nearly
always accurate.

Language is largely accurate.

Simple
structures
tend
to
dominate. Noticeable serious
errors but not frequent. Sentences
that show some varieties and
complexities will generally be
lifted from the text. Punctuation
and spelling largely accurate.

Wholesale copying of text material,

not a complete transcript of the
original. Own language limited to
single word substitution. Irrelevant
sections more frequent.

More frequent serious errors but

meaning never in doubt. Simple
structures but accuracy not
sustained. Simple punctuation and
spelling of simple words largely
accurate. Irrelevant or distorted
details might destroy sequence in
places.

More or less a complete transcript

of the text. Random transcription of
irrelevant parts of text.

Heavy frequency of serious

errors.
Fractured
syntax.
Poor
punctuation and spelling. Errors
impede reading.

SECTION D
POEM
32

a.
b

friend / foe / enemy (only 1 is accepted)

grow

c.
d.

The wrath
i. upset/ sad/ unhappy (any suitable response
ii. no one to talk to/ no one to share (any suitable response

NOVEL
Response - 10 marks ( Refer to the band descriptors for response)
Language - 5 marks ( Refer to the band descriptors for language)

RESPONSE (10 marks)

Score
9-10

7-8

5-6

3-4

0-2

Band Descriptors
Response is relevant to the task specified and is well-supported with
evidence from the text. Main and supporting ideas are relevant to the
task specified. Ideas presented clearly, well-organised and easily
understood.
Response is relevant to the task specified and is usually supported
with evidence from the text. Main and supporting ideas are mostly
relevant to the task specified. Ideas presented fairly clear, and easily
understood.
Response is likely to be intermittently relevant to the task specified.
The response is supported with some evidence from the text. Writing
contains some ideas that are relevant to the task specified. Ideas
presented generally clear and can be understood.
Response may be barely relevant to the task specified. The
response is unlikely to have textual support. Writing barely contains
ideas that may be relevant to the task specified. Ideas presented
may be difficult to understand.
Has barely any understanding of the requirements of the task. Writes
in a disorganized way. No coherence. Has no understanding of the
task. Response provided in language other than English or no
response.

LANGUAGE (5 MARKS)

SCORE
5

BAND DESCRIPTORS
Apart from occasional slips, language is always accurate. Sentence
structure is varied. Punctuation is accurate. Spelling is secure.

4
3
2

Language is almost always accurate. Unnoticeable serious errors may

occur. Punctuation is accurate. Spelling is nearly always secure.
Language largely accurate. Simple structures tend to dominate. Noticeable
serious errors may occur when more complex structures are attempted.
Punctuation is largely accurate. Spelling is mostly secure.
Meaning is not in doubt. Serious errors become more frequent. Very
simple structures used but accuracy is not sustained. Simple punctuation is
usually correct. Spelling of simple words accurate. Irrelevant or distorted
details destroy the sequence.
Heavy frequency of serious errors impedes reading. Fractured syntax is
rampant. Punctuation falters. Spelling mostly inaccurate.