Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 1
the introduction geometric fortification, and of the firearms that made them
necessary 6
commenced without fear, continued without danger, concluded without lossMachiavelli 6
new fortresses increase in army size, improve discipline and lengthen the service
of their men 7
military activity became the capture and defense of fortified places 7
emphasis on defense, war was primarily sieges 7
introduction of bombards (canon) problem of transporting them 7
some fortifications could withstand the blast by design 7
1498- venetian state- wars of the present time are influenced more by the force of
bombards and artillery than by men at arms 10
before battles were bloodless although artillery was already in use, it was
managed with such lack of skill that it caused little hurt Francesco Guicciardini 10
with guns, cities once considered impregnable were captured with ease 10
low, thick walls with bastions 10
the new designs were effective but incredibly expensive 12
trace italienne required months or years and a chain of seigeworks had to be built and
manned until the defenders were starved out or they were close enough to bombard12
tunnels were excavated under a bastion where gunpowder mines could be placed,
creating a breach capable of being stormed 13
to carry out an attack and defend ones own fortresses at the same time required
unprecedented concentrations of both men and muntions 14
revolution of siege warfare during the renaissance was accompanied by a revolution
in field warfare, as tactics which relied on the direct use of brute force gave way to
the use of firepower 16
o began in italy
o the English had used volleys of arrows and cavalry charges since the wars
of Edward I 16
guns first appeared on the battle field of Europe in the 1300s but they were inferior to
the bow in terms of accuracy and range 17
o well trained archer could fire 10 bows a minute, it would take several
minutes to reload a gun17
o gun remained attractive because it required no training for use; archers
might take years to train 17
volleys- the first line fired together then retired to reload while the next rank came
forward and then did the same- increase rate of musket fire, dutch method, William
Louis of nassau 19
o armies spread out to minimize target and maximize effect 19
o placed importance on the ability of units to move fast and in unison 20
o troops needed to be trained, men divided up into smaller formations 20
soldier wages depended on labor and food prices varied greatly, affected the
availability of recruits 46
some people joined so they were guaranteed a meal. 1710, price of bread so high the
army offered the poor one of their few chances of survival. Hardship was the most
prominent reason for enlistment 47
o wages hard to come by, risk of being looted or bankrupt by heavy taxes high
even with volunteers it was still hard to supply a long war, entire units of men recruits
from other parts of Europe, enlisting soldiers of a defeated enemy, and drafting local
men against their will as a last resort
enlistment pardoned all crimes, but those pardoned couldnt return 50
all governments wanted veterans because they were already trained. High rewards
were offered to those who would switch from one service to another 51
veterans could win against more numerous forces. 51
veterans were encouraged to go fight for the other side after the wars over. But danger
in enlisting yesterdays enemy no sense of nationalism possibility of desertion
52
common method: draft criminals or the unemployed 52
compulsory recruiting in Sweden most soldiers were peasant farmers. Overall
recruitment had devastating impact on isolated communities 52
enlistment had become a death sentence. Deleterious consequences for Swedens
population. 52
ability to plunder civilians kept some from deserting. At the expense of the unarmed
civilian. 59
heterogeneous methods of recruiting, high wastage rates, and mobility within the
ranks destroyed any sense of corporate identity among individual formations 60
there were more soldiers and more weapons, it was more expensive. Each solider had
to be fed, clothed, and paid. 61
war dragged on for a long time the object is not to smash but tire warfare
entirely dependant on money, 61
he who has the most money wins 62
Spain went further and further into debt for war 63
Borrow borrow borrow to wage war 64
Governments paid private contractors and entrepreneurs to supply the military
services they could no longer afford to organize themselves. 64
Fire money- an army threatened to set fire to a community unless it produced cash or
goods to support the troops. In return the village gets a letter of protection 65 almost a
permanent military tax enforced by the army. Communities would hear that the army
was coming and get ready by sometimes importing goods from other nearby areas.
Struggle to supply large numbers of standard issue items. Some items defective,
overall extreme lack of supplies. 67
Uniforms difficult for everyone to wear the same thing, clothes ruined easily,
terrible conditions, replaced clothes with whatever they could. All those on the same
said would wear a sash or ribbon. 71
Once permanent regiments were established, uniforms made more sense. 1620s in
Sweden and Austria, 1660s in france and England 72
Standing armies gave rise to military hospitals. First permanent hospital opened in
1585 in spain. 72; france followed 1670; Britain 1681. 75
Tasks of feeding and lodging the troops was much harder because it was a daily
problem.
Providing was difficult because such large amounts had to be prepared on a daily
basis. Normal rationing of meet required 1,500 sheep every day. lots of beer, lots of
bread. 75-76
The ovens to cook the bread 250 carts, 250 animals to pull the carts. Long transport
distances.
Oliver Cromwell transported supplies by water to help alleviate this problem.
George Monck (cromwells successor) made the soldiers carry a weeks worth of food
at once. 76
Some armies would carry tents, or use huts. Most men didnt use the hut because it
was a lot of trouble to set up. Solution: armies carry enough tents, and build barracks
to put it in during the winter. 78
Army of Flanders solved all of its supply problems 80
By using contractors everything got done. Food shelter and clothing were all steadily
provided. This diminished mutinies that broke out when governments tried to provide
pay rather than provisions.
Period between the great discoveries of the 1490s and the railways of the 1840s
where control of strategically important waters decided the balance of power in
Europe and beyond. 83
1372 bombard on Chinese ship, Chinese found it too difficult to supply a standard
caliber of shot and they were too prone to explode. They depreciated ship borne
artillery as too inaccurate. Chinese deliberately rejected ship borne artillery. 84
oared fighting ships, well armed galleys
quinquereme- largest wooden ship ever built. Built by venetians after many pirate
raids. 87
galass- 50 meters long instead of the galleys 40, propelled by oars and sails, far
better armed
size of the crew required was the galleys crucial weakness. How to carry all the
supplies could not stay at see long, ran out of supplies. 89
improvement in sail plans meant that sails could be used more efficiently for
propulsion less number of crew. with handguns, ships could be defended with
fewer men, boats in creased in size. 89
2 important inventions that changed the nature of sea warfare: 90
Ivory chess set- Indian army vs. native infantry of British East India Trading
Company. Indian soldiers have swords and shield while European soldiers are in
uniform and equipped with firearms. 115
European overseas expansion superiority of western weaponry and military
organization over most others changing military balance 115
Import of Asian spics, silver production in America, export of slaves was due to force
and violence 115
Sudden progress of western military methods after 1740s was so rapid it left many
Europeans bewildered 115
o Fashionable to attribute the rapid transformation to the innate moral
superiority of the White Man or industrial revolution but these explain the
35% to 84%, not the original 35% rise of the west broken down into
geographical and chronological components. 117
1650- west had achieved military mastery in Cent. + NE America, Siberia, a few
coastal areas of subsaran Africa, and the islands of SE asia. 117/118
o white men found inhabitants, fought dirty and fought to kill 118
o Indians might fight 7 years and not kill 7 men
Edmund scott- military organization in SE asia was shared with America and Africanative wars were fought to enslave enemies not exterminate them118
o Gain men not territory
o However, the aim of making war in Europe was never to secure slaves, as it
was in the non-european areas listed
Less civilized people to the north and south of incan and Aztec empires lacked
defenses118
o Natives knew the area, invaders did not 119
Indians adapted to Western superiority after the initial defeats, Indians avoided
battles with the Europeans because they almost always lost them.
o Soldiers would march to an Indiantown to find it gone 119
o Europeans realized that the only way to win was to adopt similar guerilla
methods
Indians obtained guns from French in 1640s 119
o Native Americans learned fast but lost ground because their numbers
dwindled diseases and influx of westerner immigration 119
Downfall of the Aztecs bottom of 119
Western armment may have aided in battles but it could seldom win wars 120
o On Swahili coast, prices could secure firearms from turks, 120
o Dutch began to trade guns for slaves 121
This inflow of Western technology scarcely affected most African military techniques
121
o Yoruba techniques- spread themselves out and fire until out of ammounition
tactics would prove ineffective against highly trained European forces. 121
Black Africa fought for slaves, guns were unless at securing fit and healthy slaves 121
o Use of pellets rather than bullets overcame this problem but did nothing to
help the adoption of the musket into African warfare, gun didnt fit into
African military tradition at all. 121
Slaves played important role in determining Muslim response to Europes military
challenge; slaves were central to Islamic warfare. 125
o Recruited while they were children, they often were a form of tribute paid by
non-Muslims to their conquerors.
Islamic warfare: Core of every major army composed of men without local ties,
devoted entirely to fulfilling their governments wishes, and fighting in a traditional
manner. 126
Ottoman empire adopted western military technology with speed and thoroughness
126
o Guns rapidly developed by Turks, advanced siege offense and defense
techniques evident from the 1520s,
Military revolution IMPERFECTLY practiced by Turks in 3 ways
o Despite abundant human and natural resources, troops could not match the
firepower of their Christian opponents Turks had few specialists with
muskets and many horses, western improvements like volley fire and
multiplication of field guns widened the gap. 126
Well-equipped Christians repeatedly defeated their Turkish
adversaries.
o In later centuries ottoman troops had become excellent imitators, but poor
innovators; they could copy any weapon they found but had difficulty
adopting it into the traditional framework. 127
Turks never learned to change think columns into thin lines they
never mastered siege warfare. 127 Ignorance of progress made them
stagnant as others advanced beyond their abilities.
o Metallurgical inferiority: arms/armor taken from Islamic forces were no use to
westerners poor quality metal 128
Indian armies may have been huge but they were congregations of individual heroic
warriors, who tried to close with as many enemies as possible during a single
combat130
Dutchmen in the east were convinced that no profit was to be had without power, and
no trade without war 132
o Trade maintained under protection of weapons, weapons paid for by the
profits from trade. Therefore trade cannot be maintained w/o war
British East India Company- increase in numerical strength and new, more reliable
flintlock muskets made it possible to challenge the smaller native states of India. 134
o They won the battle of Plassey and the right to collect state revenues in select
Indian providences earned a ton of money, millions of pounds sterling, with
the money they built impregnable fortresses and raised huge armies, the
prospect of European domination of India became a real possibility. 135
o Then native rulers adopted western military techniques under the guidance of
French discipline that stopped the British in their tracks for a little while, had
impressive numbers and field artillery, but the imitation was too little too late.
It seemed the Europeans not had the means to challenge even their most
powerful opponents. 136
America, Siberia, Black Africa, and the Philippines lost heir independence to Europe
because they had not time to adopt western military technology; Muslim world
succumbed because they saw no need to integrate it into their existing system 136
East Asia was different because they already knew the rules of the game, firearms and
fortresses had been there for a while. 136
o Both bronze and iron artillery were fully developed in china before they
spread westwards to Europe 136
o but after the mid 1300s, the two sects separated and began to evolve
differently guns of western manufacture were both more powerful and more
mobile than those of the east 137
Japanese had smaller army but made use of western firearms rapid adoption of the
gun to win battles. Europe concentrated on improving reloading time while Japanese
concentrated on accuracy. 140
Japanese leaders were perfectly prepared to take over western military innovations,
they always adapted them to local conditions in a distinctive way. 143
China had no need for western advances; gunpowder had been around for centuries
and the massive fortification of the Ming dynasty were designed to resist
bombardment and mining. 143
o Scale of fortification in East Asia rendered siege guns useless 144
After 1580, Japanese central government revoked all weapons from anyone who
might try to resist taxes or policies demilitarization of Japan 144
Japan and China remained unchallenged until the improvements from the industrial
revolution; they did not fall before the military revolution. 145
Growth of an effective bureaucracy was essential for the creation, control, and supply
of larger and better equipped armies 147
Roberts originally proposed 1660, just before the prodigious armies and absolute
states of Louis XIV and his contemporaries. HOWEVER, military aims and problems
after this date are too similar to not include them. 147
Frederick II of Prussias military system- large army, huge death rate. Rapid fire was
main focus, rapid fire at close range lead to high losses of men. Increase in materials
needed: more muskets, gunpowder, more flour, uniforms. High cost of life/ high
financial cost (90%) still insufficient, lots of cut corners: plunder allowed, nothing
spent on the wounded, no pensions. 148