DEVELOPING COUNTRIES States have no responsibility to other states States are sovereign meaning they are the supreme authority within a territory. Increasingly it is seen that it is the people who are sovereign through a social contract where the government rules by consent of the people. They are therefore not responsible to other states. If a government exists to protect and improve the lives of its own citizens, then, there is no obligation for any state whether developed or developing to take on the responsibility of combating climate change and its spillover elsewhere. Politicians have to respond to the wishes of their electorate and the electorates priority is never going to be people who are thousands of miles away. In developed countries policy changes to curb climate change harms its own citizens interests or wellbeing, thus it is highly unlikely that these changes will be implemented. Developed countries may have an obligation to their own citizens to do what they can to prevent climate change but this obligation is no higher than their responsibility to maintain Socio- Economic stability and development of their country. Commitment to cuts in CO2 emission will result in slowing down of the economic growth and development of their country. Therefore no developed country will enter into a treaty to combat the Climate Change effects faced by Developing Countries. This is exactly why negotiations towards a binding treaty on climate change is not getting anywhere. ( For example USA and Canada did not ratify the Kyoto protocol between 1997 to 2006)
Developing countries have the biggest incentive to
reduce emissions.
Developing countries will suffer the most due to climate change
with adverse effects like flooding, crop failure and the spread of deserts. Since most of the Developing countries are in the Tropics they will be affected the most by rising temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns. Therefore developing countries have the greatest necessity and incentive to change. Developed countries which are less affected by climate change have the wealth, technology and International power to take steps to reverse climate change but they do not have a compelling need or will to make the necessary economic sacrifices. As it is developing countries who are in harms way of climate change it is the responsibility of their politicians to respond to their electorate and act to prevent climate change or reduce its impact. When Developed countries are not willing to make the basic change of reducing their CO2 emissions due to economic costs how can we expect them to pay for the spillovers of climate change in Developing countries. Moreover if Developed countries pay for the spillovers of climate change in Developing countries there will be no disincentive to force Developing Nations to cut CO2 emissions. (UK and Germany were recently caught giving clandestine subsidy for the construction of thermal power plants and coal. So the governments are actually doing the opposite to encourage an increase in CO2 emissions.
Pinning responsibility on nations is wrong and unhelpful.
The very slow progress being made by the international community in its conferences to come up with a workable framework to prevent climate change is due to squabbling over whose responsibility is for what. Imagine that all the countries are all in on different leaky lifeboats far from shore, all the countries have to row and bail, row and bail and only row and bail to save their lives instead if they take time out to debate on who ought to do what, all the boats will sink eventually as time goes by and the whole debate of finding out whose fault is what is futile The Developed nations are in larger boats and will be the last ones to sink as they believe, hence there is a difference in motivation between Developed
and Developing countries to do the needful to stop and reverse Climate
Change
QUOTE: Global warming is not just the greatest environmental challenge
facing our planet it is one of mankinds greatest challenge for survival. - Barack Obama