Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
In this project, both a 4-stage differential multipath ring VCO and a series quadrature LC VCO with
polyphase filter are designed to generate 8-phase output. The design is implanted using TSMC 0.35um
technology and Spectre simulation shows that -120dBc/Hz phase noise at 1MHz offset is achieved for
both topologies. The tuning range is from 1.2GHz to 1.5GHz and the phase error is controlled below 2
degree.
I. INTRODUCTION
Multiphase generation is widely used in high speed wireless and wire-line communication systems. In
wireless application, one example is phase-array receiver which is based on multiple-antenna phased
arrays. In wire-line application, one popular example is the phase detector in the clock and data recovery
(CDR) system. The availability of accurate multiphase signals is a prerequisite for the implementation of
high performance and that is probably why the study of multiphase generation has attracted the interest of
many researchers.
In design of multiphase VCOs, one of the most critical issues is the tradeoff of phase noise and phase
error. The phase noise in wireless communication emits interference energy at adjacent bands which is
critical to minimize for proper operation of the entire system. The phase noise in SerDes simply integrates
to form the rms random jitter which subtracts from the jitter margin. The phase noise requirement for this
project is -120dBc which is a pretty common value seen on papers and can satisfy the requirement of a lot
of applications. The phase error between different phases is important for image rejection in wireless
communication system and for minimizing jitter for inter-chip communication systems. Less than 1 deg
of phase error is required for wireless communication while for SerDes a less stringent requirement is set
for jitter performance.
II. BACKGROUND
One of the good properties of the topology of ring oscillator is that it can generate multi-phase output
directly. That is why multiphase ring oscillators are kind of dominant in research and industry. In this
project, a 4 stage multipath ring oscillator is designed for 8 phase output generation.
LC oscillator is also very attractive since it can provide better phase noise performance. Efforts have been
made to generate multiphase output using LC oscillator. Generally there are three methods for the aim of
multiphase generation [1]. At present the most popular method is to let the LC VCO oscillate at a higher
frequency, and then use the frequency divider to obtain multiple phases at lower frequency. This
frequency division approach has the additional benefit of avoiding any pushing /pulling effect on the
VCO due to the strong signal from the power amplifier. As a drawback, however, a higher oscillation
frequency and higher power consumption due to the high speed divider circuit are usually demanded.
Multiphase output can also be obtained by using a polyphase filter, usually realized as an RC polyphase
filter. Also this approach introduces substantial power consumption and the buffers are needed for the
preceding VCO in order not to decrease the Q of the LC tank. A third method of generating multiphase
output is by cross-coupling LC-tank VCOs. The combination of a direct connection and a cross
connection forces two VCOs to oscillate in quadrature. Buy cross coupling more number of VCOs, more
output phases can be achieved. In this project, 8 phases output is implemented by combing the second and
third approach. A quadrature VCO is first used to generate 4 phases output and then a polyphase filter is
adopted to do the 4 to 8 phase conversion.
Transistor P1 is fixed, however, the gate voltage of P0 and P2 can be adjusted to change the oscillating
frequency, in which P2 is for course tuning. To get larger tuning range, the size of P0 and P2 should be
increased. To get higher center frequency, P1 and N0 can made larger to increase the biasing current.
The phase noise performance of the ring oscillator can be analyzed based on the following equations:
In which,
In this topology, N0 has an optimal value around half size of N0 in terms of phase noise. A width sweep
can be done to find it.
Generally considering the design issues above the dimensions of the transistors are listed in Table 1.
Table 1 Dimension of transistors in each inverting cell
Transistor
P0
P1
P2
N0
W
12u
13u
20u
30u
L
600n
600n
600n
600n
Fig 4 shows the change of Kvco with the control voltage which is the derivative of the tuning range curve.
It can be seen that the VCO gain is within 157MHz/V to 200MHz/V while the control voltage is within
0V to 1.65V with a percentage range of 25% variation. This variation must be accounted for when
designing the loop dynamics of the PLL response so as to make the loop stable and fast enough under all
VCO gains.
Design
[3]
[4]
[5]
This Work
FOM
-154
-165.8
-140
-164
GM
I I ,1
A0
, GMc
I Q ,1
A0
where I I ,1 is the component of the first current harmonic in-phase with Vx and I Q ,1 is the quadrature
component of the first current harmonic.
Wcpl
Wsw
The smaller the coupling factor is, the better phase noise will be achieved. However, a small coupling
factor will lead to a big phase error. So there is obviously a trade-off of phase noise and phase error in PQVCO design.
In S-QVCO, on the contrary, the phase error is almost independent of the coupling factor for all
reasonable values. In this case, the phase error depends only on the actual amount of mismatch between
ideally identical components, once the QVCO architecture has been selected. Thus, you have much more
flexibility to optimize the phase noise of S-QVCO. That is another good advantage of S-QVCO compared
with P-QVCO.
To estimate Gm and Gmc in the S-QVCO, a highly simplified picture for the differential current
waveforms in 4 different phase cases are shown in Fig 11. During phase 2 and 4, the cross-coupled
switches operate in the triode region and never switch off completely. The bias current is therefore shared
between both branches. While, in phase 1 and 3, the bias current is injected into only one branch.
I1 I 2 (1 2 ) Itail
Thus, we can estimate I I ,1 and I Q ,1
I I ,1
I Q,1
(2 I tail I 2 I1 )
1
(2 I tail I1 I 2 )
(1 ) I tail
4
I tail
In this design, the tail current is 12mA and the measure average current during phase 2 corresponding to
I1 is around 4mA. Thus the coupling factor is calculated to be around 0.5.
S-QVCO Design
Considering the advantage of S-QVCO over P-QVCO described above, the S-QVCO topology is adopted
in this design. The schematic is shown in Fig 12 and the main device dimensions are listed in Table 3.
The inductor model used in this design is shown in Fig 13 and the parasitic values are listed in Table 4.
The Q of the inductor is around 8 (It is very difficult to get a Q larger than 5, so this model is taken from a
published paper on VCO). The tail current is chosen to be 12mA (power consumption of 72mW), so that
a good gm can which will ensure the oscillation under various control condition. Since there is no
Accumulation-Mode Varactor offered in the library, we connect Bulk, Source and Drain of a PMOS
transistor together to form one terminal of the varactor, and use the gate as the other terminal. In this way,
we can get a relatively large cap tuning from 2.8pF to 1.2pF. However, the range is not enough for the
requirement, so a cap bank is needed to enhance the tuning range.
k2
, k3 1
2
3
To achieve equivalent minimum IRR of every two notches, the following condition must be satisfied:
k3 k2 2
Which means middle frequency should be the geometry average of the low and high frequency.
The relative bandwidth is defined as:
BWrel
max
2k2 2 1.9k2 0.9
min
In this design we want a relative bandwidth of 1.25.The loss of the filter is another issue to consider. As a
rule of thumb, the signal losses 3dB per stage, so generally 9dB loss is expected in a 3 stage poly phase
filter.
In this design, the low frequency pole is located at 1.2GHz and the high frequency pole is located at
1.5GHz. The optimized middles frequency should be 1.34GHz which is the geometry average of low and
high frequency. The capacitors are of equal value of 1pF, and thus the resistances are calculated to be
106.1, 118.6 and 132 respectively.
The Matlab code used to optimize the poly filter is listed as below:
R1=106.1;
R2=118.6;
R3=132;
C3=1e-12;
C2=1e-12;
C1=1e-12;
w1=1/(R1*C1);
w2=1/(R2*C2);
w3=1/(R3*C3);
s=tf('s');
s1=j*w1;
s2=j*w2;
s3=j*w3;
IIR=((s+s1)*(s+s2)*(s+s3))^2/((s-s1)*(s-s2)*(s-s3))^2;
bode(IIR,{2*pi*1e9,2*pi*2e9})
k2=w1/w2;
k3=w1/w3;
BW=2*k2^2-1.9*k2+0.9
DISCUSSION
In this project, two different topologies are used to generate 8-phase output. Both of the ring VCO and the
LC VCO with polyphase filter can handle the tuning range from 1.2GHz and 1.5GHz. The ring oscillator
is optimized to have a good phase noise performance of -120dBc/Hz at 1MHz offset and the LC oscillator
has even better phase noise performance. The total power consumption of the ring oscillator is 84mW,
while the power consumption of the QVCO stage alone is 72mW. The buffer to drive the polyphase filter
also consumes a lot of power to get good oscillating performance. Generally, the design meets all the
specifications of this project. However, further power consumption optimization still needs to be done in
the future.
REFERENCE
[1] Pietro Andreani, Andrea Bonfanti, Luca Romano, and Carlo Samori, Analysis and Design of a
1.8GHz CMOS LC Quadrature VCO, IEEE JSSC, Dec 2002, pp 1737-1746
[2] Hai Qi Liu, etc, A Low-Noise Multi-GHz CMOS Multiloop Ring Oscillator With Coarse and Fine
Frequency Tuning.
[3] E. Tatschl-Unterberger, S. Cyrusian, and M. Ruegg, A 2.5 GHz phaseswitching PLL using a supply
controlled 2-delay-stage 10 GHz ring oscillator for improved jitter/mismatch, in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp.
Circuits Syst., 2005, pp. 54535456.
[4] C.-H. Park and B. Kim, A low-noise, 900-MHz VCO in 0.6-um CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-State
Circuits, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 586591, May 1999.
[5] M. Grozing, B. Philipp, and M. Berroth, CMOS ring oscillator with quadrature outputs and 100 MHz
to 3.5 GHz tuning range, in Proc. 29th Eur. Solid-State Circuit Conf., 2003, pp. 679682.
[6] A. Rofougaran, J. Rael, M. Rofougaran, and Abidi, A 900MHz CMOS LC-oscillator with quadrature
outputs, Proc. ISSCC 1996, Feb. 1996, pp. 392-293.
[7] Pietro Andreani, and Xiaoyan Wang, On the phase-noise and phase error performances of multiphase
LC CMOS VCOs, IEEE JSSC, Nov 2004, pp. 1883-1893.
[8] Ibrahim R. Chamas, Sanjay Raman, A comprehensive analysis of Quadrature Signal Synthesis in
Cross-Coupled RF VCOs, IEEE TCAS, Nov 2007, pp. 689-703.
[9] Farbod Behbahani, Yoji Kishigami, John Leete, and Asad A. Abidi, CMOS Mixer and Polyphase
Filter for Large Image Rejection, IEEE JSSC, Jun 2001, pp 873-886
[10] Jouni Kaukovuori, Kari Stadius, Jussi Ryynanen, and Kari A. I. Halonen, Analysis and Design of
Passive Polyphase Filters, Nov 2008, pp 3023-3037
[11] Lan-Chou Cho, Chihun Lee, and Shen-Iuan Liu, A 1.2V 37-38.5GHz Eight-Phase Clock Generator
in 0.13um CMOS Technology, IEEE JSSC, Jun 2007, pp 1261-1269
[12] Frank Herzel and Wolfgan Winkler., A 2.5GHz Eight-Phase VCO is SiGe BiCMOS Technology,
IEEE TCAS, vol. 52, pp. 140-144, Mar 2005.