Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The result can be simply checked by putting all of the expanded terms over a
common denominator.
The example given above shows that partial fraction expansion can easily
expand a complex fraction into a sum of simpler fractions. However, there are
many situations where the expansion is not so simple. The cases we will
consider include
Order of numerator polynomial is not less than that of the denominator. Partial
fraction expansion can only be performed when the order of the denominator
polynomial (the bottom term of the fraction) is greater than the order of the
numerator (the top term). If this condition is not met, we must perform an extra
step before continuing with the expansion.
Distinct Real Roots. The problem solved above is described as the case of
distinct, real roots. This means that each term only appears once in the
denominator, and the root of each term in the denominator is a distinct real
number. In the example above, the roots were at 0, -2 and -5.
An exponential (or other function) in the numerator. Although this is not really a
special case, it often confuses students, so we will discuss what to do if you
come upon this particular type of problem.
has numerator and denominator that are both second order. Before
performing a partial fraction expansion, the fraction must be manipulated so
that the order of the numerator is less than that of the denominator. A
straightforward way to do this is to use long division on the fraction.
where the ai are all unique. In this expression D(s) is the denominator polynomial
of order n, and N(s) is the numerator polynomial whose order is less than n. We
want to perform a partial fraction expansion such that F(s) is expressed as:
where
Find A1
Find A2
Find A3
Find A1 by first "covering-up" the first term in the denominator (i.e., the
term that is associated with A1) with your finger (shown as a gray ellipse),
and then letting s=0.
Likewise for A2
and A3
Most of the unknown coefficients can be found using the "cover-up" method.
Unfortunately, the parameter A2 cannot be found in this way. Why not? {answer}
There are two commonly used methods for finding A2. The method favored by
most textbooks uses the relationship
so
This yields,
While this method is elegant (and can be extended to multiply repeated roots),
the differentiation of the ratio of polynomials is prone to errors. This method
won't be used again in this document {click for details of method}.
Another way to find the value of A2 that is completely general, involves no
calculus, is useful in other situations, and can even be used to find the
coefficients found by the cover-up method involves manipulation of the original
equation describing the partial fraction expansion by performing a crossmultiplication.
Example: Cross Multiplication
Start with the partial fraction expansion
Multiply this by the denominator (to clear it out). In other words crossmultiply the right side by the denominator of the left side.
We are left with two polynomials that are equal to each other. We can use
the fact that if two polynomials are equal, then the coefficient associated with
each power in the polynomials must be equal. The polynomial on the left of the
equals sign (i.e., s+3) only has 1st and 0th order terms, with values equal to 1
and 3, respectively. The right side is more complicated (as shown below).
order of
coefficient
left side
coefficient
3rd (s3)
2nd (s2)
1st (s1)
0th (s0)
right side
coefficient
Solution yields:
A1 = 0.1500
A2 = -0.1944
A3 = -0.1667
A4 = 0.0444
Solution of a four-by-four system of equations is obviously more complicated
than is the use of the cover-up method to find A1, A3 and A4, followed by using
the differentiation method to find A2. This begs the question: why use the
cross-multiplication technique? The answer is that the cross-multiplication
technique need not be used in isolation. The cover-up method can be used to
find A1, A3 and A4. Then the value of A2 can be found by using the expression
(obtained using cross-multiplication)
A1+A2+A4=0,
or
A2=-(A1+A4)=-0.1944
Complex roots.
Another case that often comes up is that of complex conjugate roots.
Consider the fraction:
The second term in the denominator cannot be factored into real terms. This
leaves us with two possibilities - either accept the complex roots, or find a way to
include the second order term.
Example: Complex roots; Method 1 - Using the complex (first order) roots
If we use complex roots, we can expand the fraction as we did before. This
is not typically the way you want to proceed if you are working by hand, but may
be easier for computer solutions (where complex numbers are handled as
easily as real numbers). To perform the expansion, continue as before.
where
Note that A2 and A3 must be complex conjugates of each other since they are
equivalent except for the sign on the imaginary part. Performing the required
calculations:
so
Note that the numerator of the second term is no longer a constant, but is
instead a first order polynomial. From above (or using the cover-up method) we
know that A=-0.2. We can find the quantities B and C from cross-multiplication.
order of
coefficient
left side
coefficient
right side
coefficient
2nd (s2)
A+B
1st (s1)
4A+5B+C
0th (s0)
5A+5C
Since we already know that A=-0.2, the first expression (0=A+B) tells us that
B=0.2, and the last expression (3=5A+5C) tells us that C=0.8. We can use the
middle expression (1=4A+5B+C) to check our calculations. Finally, we get
Instead, it is simplified to
The quantities A1, A2 and A3 are found in the same way as for the case of
distinct real roots (above). So
References