Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
ISSN 1752-1416
Received on 23rd September 2014
Revised on 27th April 2015
Accepted on 19th May 2015
doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2014.0321
www.ietdl.org
Md Ayaz Chowdhury 1 , Abu Hena Md Sayem 2, Weixiang Shen 2, Kazi Shariful Islam 2
1
Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Sarawak Campus, Kuching 93350, Sarawak,
Malaysia
2
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Melbourne 3122, Victoria, Australia
E-mail: mchowdhury@swinburne.edu.my
Abstract: This study presents the design of a robust active disturbance rejection (ADR) controller in order to improve lowvoltage ride-through (LVRT) capability of wind farms connected with doubly fed induction generator (DFIG). The ADR
controller is particularly effective in real-time estimation and mitigation of the total effect of various uncertainties
against a wide range of parameter variations, model uncertainties and large disturbances. The performance evaluation
of the designed controller is performed on an IEEE system under different test cases. The simulation results show that
the proposed controller is robust against uncertainties in operating conditions and successfully improves the damping
and voltage stability and thus the LVRT capability of DFIGs.
Introduction
DFIG model
The wind turbine rotor that extracts the kinetic energy from the
wind is a complex aerodynamic system. The aerodynamic torque,
which is the input torque to the wind turbine is given as
r
A c (l, u)v3w
Tae =
2vm wt p
1
v m =
T K s g Dm v m
2Hm ae
1
K g Te DG vG
2HG s
1
g = 2pf vm
v
Ng G
v G =
1
T Tm
2HG e
1
vs vdr
E qr = E qr (X X )ids svs Edr
To
(9)
(10)
(11)
where
X = Xs + Xm Xr Xm + Xr
(12)
X = Xs + Xm
(13)
Lr + Lm
Rr
(14)
To =
(15)
(2)
v X
vdr =
dr m
Xm + Xr
(16)
(3)
vqr Xm
vqr =
Xm + Xr
(17)
(4)
(5)
(8)
(1)
where is the air density, is the rotor speed, Awt is the swept area,
cp is the pitch angle, is the pitch angle and l is the tip speed ratio.
Two-stage conversion of the aerodynamic torque Tae takes place
through the drivetrain attached to the wind turbine. The drivetrain
is conventionally treated as two lumped masses, that is, turbine
mass and generator mass, which are connected together by a shaft
with a certain damping and stiffness coefcient values. Turbine
mass includes lumped inertia of the turbine, part of the gearbox
and the low-speed shaft and generator mass includes generator
rotor mass, high-speed shaft along with its disk brake and the rest
part of the gearbox. The shaft dynamics can be expressed as [20]
1
+ vs vqr
E dr = E dr + (X X )iqs + svs Eqr
To
(6)
v2dc
Pr (t) Pg (t)
Rloss
(18)
(19)
(20)
(7)
This paper proposes a control strategy based on the above-described
DFIG model for a single machine innite bus test system in the
following section.
The GSC and RSC control strategies for the DFIGs are shown in
Fig. 2. The RSC operates to control active and reactive powers
once a voltage dip is detected and thus helps limiting the rotor
fault current and increasing the damping of stator ux and,
consequently, improving the LVRT capability of the DFIGs. The
main objective of the GSC is to regulate the dc-link voltage and
reactive power irrespective of the magnitude and direction of the
slip power. It is important to maintain relatively constant voltage
through supplying the real-power demand for the RSC to perform
its control tasks although the GSC handles only 25% of the total
power of the DFIG [23]. The control task of the RSC includes
independent regulation of active and reactive powers with the help
of iqr and idr, which are achieved from vdc and vt by PI
controllers. The priority belongs to the active power, so the
Checker block checks the available capacity for idg with respect to
iqg while the rating of GSC is 25% of the DFIG. The dc-link
voltage dynamics prevent a conventional linear controller from
properly limiting the dc-voltage under severe disturbances. Thus
the proposed control method considers the non-linearity of the
DFIGs.
The reference signals for the dc and terminal voltages vdcref and
vtref are set to a constant value (1 pu). These values depend on
three main factors: (i) the size of the converter, (ii) the ratio
between stator voltage and rotor voltage and (iii) the modulation
factor of the power converters [24]. The reference point for
reactive power Qgref is set as zero (during normal condition) or a
certain non-zero value (during disturbances). The reference point
for active power Pgref is set through maximum power point
tracking control (during normal operation) or the damping control
(during disturbances).
(21)
where U(s) and Y(s) are the input and output, respectively, G(s) is the
TF and W(s) is the total disturbance including unknown internal
dynamics and external disturbances, which are presented in the
output to facilitate simplicity in the control structure and eliminate
computation burden. Now, G(s) can be described as
G(s) =
nm
(22)
(23)
Fig. 2 Conguration of
a RSC controller
b GSC controller
nm
Gleft (s) =
m2
(25)
where
X (s) = X1 (s)
cnm snm + bcnm1 snm1 + + c1 s + c0 + Gleft (s) Y (s)
= U (s) + W (s)
0
0
A=
...
...
0
(26)
where
cnm =
an
bm
1
c
snm1 + + c1 s + c0 + Gleft (s) Y (s)
cnm nm1
1
W (s)
cnm
C= 1
(nm)
0
...
1
0 (nm)(nm)
0 b 1
0 0 ... 0
T
(nm)
(nm)
^
sZ(s) = AZ(s) + BU (s)L Y (s) Y (s)
(30)
...
...
...
...
...
T
We assume that D(s) has the local Lipschitz continuity and sD(S) is
bounded within domain of interests. With quantitative concept of
Lipschitz continuity, a number of differential equations can be
solved so that effective convergence of numerical simulation is
reached. Moreover, assumption of Lipschitz continuity allows ESO
to be simple, low-dimensional and singular structured and
eliminates the problem of chattering phenomena which is
associated with difculty in practical implementation of controllers
in hardware because of disorientation of switching signals.
Now the ESO can be expressed as [2628]
(32)
1
0
... 1
... 0
... ...
0 ...
E = 0 ...
. . . . . . Xnm (s)
X2 (s)
T
B = 0 . . . 0 b 0 (nm)
(27)
(28)
(31)
Y (s) = CZ(s)
where
Z(s) = Z1 (s)
Z2 (s)
Znm (s)
T
(nm)
Order of ESO
20
70
ADR controller
CV, pu
0.81
PI controller
CS, pu
CCT, s
CV, pu
CS, pu
CCT, s
1.436
0.425
0.873
1.347
0.342
and
L = b1
b2
bnm
T
(nm)
bi =
nm
i
i = 1, 2, . . . , n m
(33)
i=1
vio ,
nm1
nmi
sKDi Zi (s)
(36)
i=1
kPi
kDi
=
nm1
nmi
vcnmi , i = 1, 2, . . . , n m 1 (37)
(35)
a Real power
b PCC voltage
5.2
LVRT capability
a dc-Link voltage
b Rotor current
a Speed
b Stator current
Fig. 6 shows the simulation results of the dc-link voltage and rotor
current responses of WF1 for a fault at 1 s, which is subsequently
cleared after 300 ms. It is inspected from Fig. 6a that the dc-link
voltage followed by fault shows a high-frequency oscillatory
response that cannot be damped by using a PI controller.
Higher-order ESO in the proposed controller helps to estimate this
disturbed parameter and a better smoothing to dc-link voltage
uctuations is achieved by using the proposed ADR controller.
The dc-link voltage reaches its peak at 1.06 pu with the proposed
controller while it is 1.96 pu with the PI controller. Thus the
dc-link capacitor is exposed to lower voltage stress with the
proposed controller as compared with the conventional one. It is
clear from Fig. 6b that a similar damping for complex rotor fault
current is achieved through the use of the proposed ADR
controller, which demonstrates effectiveness of using a
higher-order ESO for the controller. The peak rotor fault currents
exceed the RSC tolerable threshold, that is, 2 pu, with the PI
controller during the fault. Meanwhile, the proposed controller
effectively scales the peak rotor fault current down to 1.25 pu,
which is well below the RSC tolerable limit. The proposed method
also minimises the rotor current uctuations. Again, the supremacy
of the proposed ADR controller to the conventional PI controller
is manifested during these symmetrical three-phase faults. Thus,
the performance comparison between two controllers will not be
considered in the following sections.
5.2.2 Low-impedance fault: Fig. 7 shows the simulation results
of the rotor speed and positive sequence magnitude of stator current
responses of WF1 for a low-impedance (0.5 ) fault at 1 s. When a
disturbance or a fault occurs, the terminal voltage drop causes the
corresponding generator rotor and stator ux to decrease, resulting
Robust performance
a Real power
b Reactive power
a Real power
b Reactive power
Fig. 10 Wind farm responses of aggregated and detailed wind farm models
for a three-phase short-circuit fault of duration 100 ms
a Real power
b PCC voltage
Conclusions
References
1 de Alegra, I.M., Andreu, J., Martn, J.L., Ibaez, P., Villate, J.L., Camblong, H.:
Connection requirements for wind farms: a survey on technical requirements and
regulation, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2007, 11, pp. 18581872
2 Chowdhury, M.A., Shen, W.X., Hosseinzadeh, N., Pota, H.R.: Transient stability
of power system integrated with DFIG wind farm, IET Renew. Power Gener.,
2015, 9, pp. 184194
3 Tsili, M., Papathanassiou, S.: A review of grid code technical requirements for
wind farms, IET Renew. Power Gener., 2009, 3, pp. 308332
4 Chowdhury, M.A., Shen, W.X., Hosseinzadeh, N., Pota, H.R.: Quantitative
assessment and comparison of fault responses for synchronous generator and
wind turbine generators based on modied transient energy function, IET
Renew. Power Gener., 2014, 8, pp. 474483
5 Joshi, N., Mohan, N.: A novel scheme to connect wind turbines to the power grid,
IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., 2009, 24, pp. 504510
6 Rahimi, M., Parniani, M.: Efcient control scheme of wind turbines with doubly
fed induction generators for low-voltage ride-through capability enhancement, IET
Renew. Power Gener., 2010, 4, pp. 242252
7 Hu, S., Lin, X., Kang, Y., Zou, X.: An improved low voltage ride through control
strategy of doubly-fed induction generator during grid faults, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., 2011, 26, pp. 36533665
8 Ibrahim, A.O., Nguyen, T.H., Lee, D.C., Kim, S.C.: A fault ride through technique
of DFIG wind turbine systems using dynamic voltage restorers, IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., 2011, 26, pp. 871882
9 Mohammadi, J., Afsharnia, S., Vaez-Zadeh, S.: Efcient fault-ride-through
control strategy of DFIG-based wind turbines during the grid faults, Energy
Convers. Manage., 2014, 78, (0), pp. 8895
10 Xu, L.: Coordinated control of DFIGs rotor and grid side converters during
network unbalance, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2008, 3, pp. 10411049
11 Pena, R., Cardenas, R., Reyes, E., Clare, J., Wheeler, P.: Control of a doubly fed
induction generator via an indirect matrix converter with changing DC voltage,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2011, 58, pp. 46644674
12 Valenciaga, F.: Second order sliding power control for a variable speed-constant
frequency energy conversion system, Energy Convers. Manage., 2010, 51, (12),
pp. 30003008
13 Zhang, S., Tseng, K.J., Choi, S.S., Nguyen, T.D., Yao, D.L.: Advanced control of
series voltage compensation to enhance wind turbine ride-through, IEEE Trans.
Ind. Electron., 2012, 27, pp. 763772
14 Campos-Gaona, D., Moreno-Goytia, E.L., Anaya-Lara, O.: Fault ride-through
improvement of DFIG-WT by integrating a two-degrees-of-freedom internal
model control, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2013, 60, pp. 11331145
15 Phan, V.T., Lee, H.H.: Improved predictive current control for unbalanced
stand-alone doubly-fed induction generator-based wind power systems, IET
Electr. Power Appl., 2011, 5, pp. 275287
16 Mullane, A., Lightbody, G., Yacamini, R.: Wind-turbine fault ride through
enhancement, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2005, 20, pp. 19291937
17 Han, J.: From PID to active disturbance rejection control, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron., 2009, 56, pp. 900906
18 Gao, Z.: Scaling and parameterization based controller tuning. Proc. American
Control Conf., 2003, pp. 49894996
19 Gao, Z.: Active disturbance rejection control: a paradigm shift in feedback control
system design. Proc. American Control Conf., 2003, p. 7
20 Ackermann, T. Ed.: Wind power in power systems (Wiley, New Jersey, 2012)
21 Lei, Y., Mullane, A., Lightbody, G., Yacamini, R.: Modeling of the wind turbine
with a doubly fed induction generator for grid integration studies, IEEE Trans.
Energy Convers., 2006, 21, pp. 257264
22 Chowdhury, M.A., Hosseinzadeh, N., Billah, M.M., Haque, S.A.: Dynamic DFIG
wind farm model with an aggregation technique. Proc. Int. Conf. Electrical and
Computer Engineering, 2010, pp. 330333
23 Hossain, M.J., Pota, H.R., Ramos, R.A.: Improved low-voltage ride-through
capability of xed-speed wind turbines using decentralised control of
STATCOM with energy storage system, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 2012, 6,
pp. 719730
24 Chowdhury, M.A., Hosseinzadeh, N., Shen, W.X.: Smoothing wind power
uctuations by fuzzy logic pitch angle controller, Renew. Energy, 2012, 38,
pp. 224233
25 Guo, B.Z., Zhao, Z.L., Yao, C.Z.: The active disturbance rejection control for
nonlinear systems using time-varying-gain. Proc. Asian Control Conf., 2013,
pp. 16
26 Rubio, J.J., Melndez, F., Figueroa, M.: An observer with controller to detect and
reject disturbances, Int. J. Control, 2014, 87, pp. 524536
27 Mahmoud, M.S., Mamon, A.M., Shi, P.: Observer-based fault tolerant control of a
class of nonlinear networked control systems, Int. J. Control, 2014, 87,
pp. 17071715
28 Li, Y., Yang, B., Zheng, T., Li, Y.: Extended state observer based adaptive back
stepping sliding model control of electronic throttle in transportation cyber physical
systems, Math. Probl. Eng., 2015, 2015, pp. 111
29 Rubio, J.J., Figueroa, M., Perez Cruz, J.H., Bejarano, F.J.: Geometric approach
and structure at innite controls for the disturbance rejection, IET Control
Theory Appl., 2012, 6, pp. 25282537
30 Chen, M.S., Chen, C.C.: H innity optimal design of robust observer against
disturbances, Int. J. Control, 2014, 87, pp. 12081215
31
32
33
Contreras-Leyva, M., Rojas, J.D.: New tuning method for PI controllers based on
Pareto-optimal criterion with robustness constraint, IEEE Latin Am. Trans., 2015,
13, pp. 434440
Rubio, J.J., Figueroa, M., Perez Cruz, J.H., Rumbo, J.: Control to stabilize and
mitigate disturbances in a rotary inverted pendulum, Rev. Mex. Fis. E, 2012, 58,
pp. 107112
Hossain, M.J., Saha, T.K., Mithulananthan, N., Pota, H.R.: Control strategies for
augmenting the LVRT capability of DFIGs in interconnected power systems,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2013, 60, pp. 25102522
34
35
36
Chowdhury, M.A., Shen, W.X., Hosseinzadeh, N., Pota, H.R.: A novel aggregated
DFIG wind farm model using mechanical torque compensating factor, Energy
Convers. Manage., 2013, 67, pp. 265274
Germond, A.J., Podmore, R.: Dynamic aggregation of generating unit models,
IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1978, PAS-97, pp. 10601069
Werner, H., Korba, P., Yang, T.C.: Robust tuning of power system
stabilizers using LMI-techniques, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 2003, 11,
pp. 147152