Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A1
06355-121346
A2
A3
Author
Co-author 1 Co-author 2
Andersson, sa
Andersson, Thomasshuvud, Johan
Azar, Christian
Holmberg, Johan
A4
A5
A6
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
B10
B11
B12
B13
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
C9
C10
C11
D1
D2
D3
D4
D5
D6
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E6
E7
Andersson, Bjrn
Appelblad, Hkan
Alberini, A.
Boj, Jan
Bostedt, Gran
Bostedt, Gran
Mattson, Leif
Bostedt, Gran
Mattson, Leif
Boman, Mattias
Bostedt, Gran
Boonstra, Froukje
Bickel, Peter
Schmid, StephFriedrich, Rainer
Boman, Mattias
Bystrm, Olof
Barker, T.
R. Knut
Brander, L.M.
R.J.G.M. Flor J.E. Vermaat
Bystrm, Olof
Bostedt, G.
L. Mattsson
Cravener, Martin
Carlsson, Fredrik Frykblom, PetLiljenstolpe, Carolina
Carlsson, Fredrik Johansson-Stenman, Olof
Carlsson, Fredrik Martinsson, Peter
Carlsson, Fredrik Martinsson, Peter
Carlsson, Fredrik Johansson-Stenman, Olof
Carlsson, Fredrik Lampi, E.
Martinsson, P.
Carlsson, Fredrik Frykblom, PetLagerkvist, C. J.
Carlsson, F.
Kataria, M.
COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners AS
Costanza, R.
R. d'Arge
R. de Groot
Drake, Lars
Drake, Lars
Drake, Lars
Drake, Lars
Kumm, Karl-IAndersson, Marie
Dalin, Per-Eric
Drake, Lars
Eliasson, Peter
Ek, Kristina
Eggert, Hkan
Olsson, Bjrn
Ekstrm, Clas
Kierkegaard, Borgstrm, Truls
Eggert, Hkan
Olsson, Bjrn
Eggert, Hkan
Olsson, Bjrn
Entec UK Limited
06299-103238
05214-135345
06188-53244
04328-13591
05214-142116
05226-173634
06211-16580
04323-92539
06186-9617
06299-94916
05128-10720
06306-51327
06353-8458
06354-41430
0688-23453
98269-13322
9896-17812
0657-152531
06228-201623
06298-4659
0660-31450
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
F7
F8
F9
G1
G2
G3
G4
G5
G6
G7
G8
G9
G10
G11a
G11b
G11c
G11d
G12
G13
G14
G15
G16
H1
H2
H3
H4
H5
H6
H7
H8
H9
H10
H11
H12
H13
H14
H15
H16
06229-45412
06185-112349
06278-5313
03110-10452
06355-114657
97300-143458
02325-14339
04273-124614
064-154426
05195-184213
06354-7348
Fredman, Peter
Folke, Carl
Frykblom, Peter
Fredman, Peter
Emmelin, Lars
Fredman, Peter
Emmelin, Lars
Fredman, Peter
Fahlgren, Louise Knutsson, Helena
Fredman, Peter
Fankhauser S.
Gren, Ing-Marie
Gren, Ing-Marie
Gren, Ing-Marie
Gren, Ing-Marie
Sderqvist, Tore
Gren, Ing-Marie
Sderqvist, ToWulff, Fredrik
Grudemo, Stefan
Grudemo, Stefan
Grudemo, Stefan
Grudemo, Stefan
Grudemo, Stefan
Grudemo, Stefan Ivehammar, PeSandstrm, Jessica
Grudemo, Stefan Ivehammar, PeSandstrm, Jessica
Grudemo, Stefan Ivehammar, PeSandstrm, Jessica
Grudemo, Stefan Ivehammar, PeSandstrm, Jessica
Grudemo, Stefan
Groth, Charlotta
Granberg, M.
Wikland, M. Nilsson, L.
Gren, I.M.
Gren, Ing-Marie. C. Folke
K. Turner
Hammar, Thomas
Hansson, Lars
Hansson, Lars
Hasund, Knut Per Hedvg, LennaPleijel, Hkan
Hanemann, W. MichJohansson, Pe Kristrm, Ben
Hrnsten, Lisa
Fredman, Peter
Heiter, Carsten
Hkby, Stina
Sderqvist, Tore
Hasund, Knut Per
Hougner, Cajsa
Heldt, Tobias
Hjalte, Krister
Hjalte, Krister
Lidgren, Karl Thelander, An
Hultkrantz, Lars
Hahn, Gunnela
Holgn, P.
Mattson, L. Li, C.-Z.
H17
H18
H19
I1
I2
I3
I4
I5
I6
I7
J1
J2
J3
J4
J5
J6
J7
J8
J9
J10
J11
J12
J13
J14
J15
J16
J17
K1
K2
K3
K4
K5
K6
K7
K8
K9
K10
K11
K12
K13
K14
L1a
L1b
L2
06278-4615
04297-154210
06282-34730
97240-185313
97240-204456
97301-165112
9872-104652
98171-125829
02281-135441
0443-123218
05214-145231
Hougner, Cajsa
Colding, J. Sderqvist, T.
Hkansson, Cecilia
Holland, M.
D. Forster
K. King
Inregia AB
Ivehammar, Pernilla
Ivehammar, Pernilla
Ivehammar, Pernilla
Israelsson, Torun
Israelsson, Torun Kristrm, Bengt
Idar, Elisabet
Jernelv, Arne
Jernelv, Arne
Jernelv, Arne
Jernelv, Arne
Kgeson, Per
Johansson, Per-Olo Kristrm, Bengt
Jansson, Jan Owen Nilsson, Jan-Eric
Johansson, Per-Olo Zavisic, Stojan
Johansson, Per-Olov
Johansson, Olof
Jmttjrn, Joachim
Johansson, Per-Olo Kristrm, BenMattsson, Leif
Johansson, Per-Olo Kristrm, BenNyquist, Hans
Johansson, Per-Olov
Johannesson, M. Johansson, P.
Johannesson, M. Johansson, P. Lfgren, K.
Johannesson, M. Johansson, P. Kristrm, B.
Johannesson, M. Johansson, P.
Katz, Katarina
Sterner, Thomas
Katz, Katarina
Sterner, Thomas
Kristrm, Bengt
Kgesson, Per
Kgesson, Per
Kristrm, Bengt
Konjunkturinstitutet
Konjunkturinstitutet
Kihlman, Tor
Wibe, Sren Johansson, Siv
Kristrm, Bengt
Kristrm, Bengt
Kataria, Mitesh
Kvendokk S.
K. E. Rosendahl
Kristofersson, D. S. Navrud
Landell, Elin
Smith, Stefan
Landell, Elin
Smith, Stefan
Leksell, Ingemar
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
L23
M1
M2
M3
M4
M5
M6
M7
N1
N2
N3
N4
O1
O2
O3
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
R1
S1
06300-5634
06184-105719
05175-135348
06352-1105
06353-52211
06355-41944
06355-95231
04322-101341
06272-74748
06354-53554
98102-151827
05261-201257
03107-12115
06173-10341
06298-102653
05235-111939
05173-214435
0337-135541
0443-93835
97271-165948
Leksell, Ingemar
Leksell, Ingemar Lfgren, Lars
Li, Chuan-Zhong Fredman, Peter
Lindvall, Jan
Lfgren, Tora
Hjerpe, Mattias
Latitila, Thomas
Paulrud, Anton
Lindberg, Kreg
Denstadli, JonFredman, Pete
Leksell, Ingemar
Lundstrm, Susanna
Leksell, Ingemar
Lwgren, Marianne
Lindberg, Kreg
Andersson, T Dellaert, Benedict
Lindqvist Dilln, J Eliasson, JonaWidell, Jenny
Lind, Gunnar
Lindqvist Dill Eliasson, Jonas
Lindberg, K.
Fredman, P.
Laitila, Thomas
Paulrud, Anton
Laitila, Thomas
Paulrud, Anton
Lagerkvist, C. J. Carlsson, F. D. Viske
Lindberg, K.,
Heldt, T.
Fredman, P.
Leksell, I.
A. Rabl
Lindhjem, H.
Malmberg, Johan
Mattsson, Leif
Mattsson, Leif
Kristrm, Bengt
Mattsson, Leif
Li, Chuan-Zhong
Mattsson, Leif
Li, Chuan-Zhong
Magnell, Mats
Ljungdahl, Fr Parker, Thomas
Markowska, A.
T. Zylicx
Nilsson, Mns
Gullberg, Monica
Nerhagen, Lena
Johansson, Hkan
Nunes, P.A.L.D.
J.C.J.M. van den Bergh
Navrud,S.
Y. Trdal
A.Hunt
Olsson, Christina
Olsson, B.
Olsthoorn, X.
M. Amann A. Bartonova
Paulrud, Anton
Paulrud, Anton
Paulrud, Anton
Dalin, Per-Eric
Paulrud, Anton
Laitila, Thomas
Paulrud, Anton
Paulrud, Anton
Persson, U.
Cedervall, M.
RIVM, EFTEC, NTUA and IIASA in association with TME a
Sandstrm, Mikael
S2a
S2b
S3
S4
S5
S6
S7
S8
S9
S10
S11
S12
S13
S14
S15
S16
S17
S18
S19
S20
S21
S22
S23
S24
S25
S26
S27
S28
S29
T1
T2
T3a
T3b
T3c
T4
T5
T6
V1
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
W6
06187-95425
0079-15141
06278-94843
04190-234323
05330-1581
06228-5421
0614-112456
0181-11255
04274-192024
05165-04546
05126-14359
06279-7385
06355-611
05165-3811
Silvander, Ulf
Silvander, Ulf
Svedrup, H
Warfvinge, P Nihlgrd, Bengt
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore
Schele, Siv
Sorsa, Riitta
Skneberg, Kristian
Soutukorva, sa
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, Tore Scharin, Henrik
Svedster, Henrik
Sundqvist, Thomas
Sundqvist, Thomas
SIKA
SIKA
Silvander, Ulf
Drake, Lars
Sundberg, Sara
Sderqvist, Tore
SOU
SIKA
SIKA
Sterner, T.
Bartelings, H
Svedsater, H.
Soutukorva, sa Sderqvist, Tore
Sderqvist, T.
Eggert, H.
Olsson, B.
Trouv, Johan
Jansson, Jan Owen
Toivonen, Anna-Lii Appelblad, H Bengtsson, B
Transek AB
Transek AB
Transek AB
Thrnqvist, Stig
Norlin, Joel Ulmestrand,
Turner, R.K.
S. Georgiou I-M. Gren
Toivonen, A.L.
E. Roth
S. Navrud
Vredin, Maria
Werneman, Peter
Wilhelmsson, Mats
Wilhelmsson, Mats
Wilhelmsson, Mats
Widlert, Staffan
Lind, Gunnar Lindqvist, Es
Wilkstrom, D.
W7
Z1
Z2
1
2
06349-51338
9868-12726
063-203846
98132-104036
Winslott Hiselius, L.
Zethraeus, N.
Johansson, P.
Zandersen, M
R. Tol
kerman, Jeanette Johnson, F. R Bergman, Lars
kerman, Jeanette
Co-author 3 Year
1994
1984
1995
Title
Document Type Source of study Type of study
Estimating theThesis
Master thesis 1994Primary
Kolets miljefJournal
Ekonomisk Debatt,Secondary
Defining the gJournal
Ecological Economi
Primary
orsakadAppendix
av SO to The National
1994 Korrosionskadekostnader
Report
PrimaryInstitute of Economic Research a
2001 The SpawningDoctoral thesis GERUM 2001:3, Dep
Primary
2004 Robustness ofWorking paper
NOTA DI LIVOROMeta/synthesis analysis
1985 Kostnadsnyttoa
Licentiate thesis Research Report, TPrimary
1995 Benefits of amReport
Report 110, Department of Forest E
1991 Skogens betydReport
Arbetsrapport 141,Primary
1995 The value of fJournal
Annals of Tourism Primary
1997 Valuing the woDoctoral thesis In Bostedt, Gran, Primary
1993 Valuation of s Report
Ume Economic Stu
Primary
iedrich, Rainer
2002 Estimation of Report
Institute of Energy Secondary
1997 Forest Enviro Doctoral thesis Silvestria 45, Department of Fores
1998 The replacemeDoctoral thesis In Bystrm, Olof, Cost-Effective
Primary
Reductions of Nonpoint So
2000 Ancillary BenWorking paper
Commission of EurMeta/synthesis analysis
2004 The Empirics Conference paper European Associat Meta/synthesis analysis
2000 The Replaceme
Journal
Environmental andSecondary/benefi
2006 A Note on BenJournal
Journal of Forest Secondary/benefits transfers
1995 SamhllsekonoThesis
Master thesis, Dep Primary
ljenstolpe, Carolina
2001 Valuing wetlanReport
Working Paper SeriPrimary
2000 Willingness toJournal
Applied EconomicsPrimary
2001 Do Hypothetica
Journal
Journal of Enviro Primary
2001 Willingness toJournal
Environmental Economics and Polic
2003 Costs
and Bene
JValues
ournalof Noise Disturbances
Journal of Transport
Economics
The Marginal
from AirSecondary
Traffic:
Doesand
thePolicy
Time of
artinsson, P.
2004 the Day Matter?
Journal
Transportation ResPrimary
agerkvist, C. J.
2005 Using Cheap Ta
Journal
Economics Letters Primary
2006 Assessing
MaWorking
paper
Working
Papers in Primary
Externalities
from Landfill
Disposal
and Incineration
of
2000 Waste - Final Main
ReportReport
(governme European CommissMeta/synthesis analysis
S. Farber, M. 1997 The Value of Magazine article Nature 387, 253-2 Meta/synthesis analysis
1987 Vrdet av bevReport
Report 289, Department of Economic
1994 Relations amon
Report
Report 74, DepartmSecondary
1994 Vrdering av Report
p. 233-241 In Frstrkta
Secondary
miljinsatser i jordbruket
ndersson, Marie
1991 Har jordbrukeReport
Smskriftserien noPrimary
2000 Smviltsjakte Thesis
Arbetsrapport 296,Primary
1992 The non-markeJournal
European Review oPrimary
1994 Miljjusterad Report
Appendix to The National
Secondary
Institute of Economic Research a
2002 Valuing the E Licentiate thesis 2002:40, Lule UniPrimary
2003 HeterogeneousConference paper Paper presented a Primary
orgstrm, Truls
1999 Monetra
vrde
Report
SLF
Reportthesis,
45, A
Swe
Secondary
Heterogenous
preferences for marine
Licentiate
amenities:
Department
choice
experiment
of Economics, School of Econ
quality
Commercial Law, Gteborg
2004 applied to water
Dissertation/thesis
Primary University.
2009 Valuing multi-Journal
Marine Policy, 33 (2),
Primary
201-206
2001 Economic EvalReport (governme Final Report for Secondary/benefits transfers
1995
1991
1998
2001
1999
2000
2001
1995
1995
1992
1993
1995
1996
Langaas, Sind 1996
1988
1988
1994
1999
2000
ndstrm, Jessica
2002
ndstrm, Jessica
2002
ndstrm, Jessica
2002
ndstrm, Jessica
2002
1987
1996
Hamberger, L.1995
1995
I.J. Bateman 1994
1974
1993
1994
eijel, Hkan
1990
Mattsson, Lei 1992
2000
2000
2003
1997
2003
2000
1977
Wells, Curt 1982
1991
1996
2000
Endangered spe
Licentiate thesis Report 109, DepartPrimary
Folke and Tomas Kberger (eds.),
The Societal Chapter in book p. 141-171 In Carl Primary
Halved EmissiDoctoral thesis in Questions in th Primary
Wilderness puJournal
Tourism Economics,
Primary
Values of MouReport
Working Paper 1999:26, The Europe
EnvironmentalDoctoral thesis Doctoral thesis, Silvestria 136, D
En slussoftill
Thesis
Master
thesis
in
e White-backed
Primary of Forest Economics, Swedish
Values
an Endangered
SpeciesDissertation
- the Case
of17,
theDepartment
Woodpecker inDissertation/thesis
Sweden
Agricultural Sciences,
Ume.
Primary
The Costs of Chapter in book London, UK: EarthSecondary/benefits transfers
Benefits from Report
Beijer Discussion Secondary
Alternative ni Journal
Ecological EconomPrimary
Costs and beneJournal
Ecological EngineeSecondary
Vtmarker - e Journal
Ekonomisk debatt, Secondary
Reduced nutrieReport
Beijer Discussion Secondary
CVM-studie av
Report
VTI Notat T29, ThePrimary
CVM-studie av
Report
VTI Notat T47, ThePrimary
Nya vgars in Report
VTI meddelande Review
7
E6 genom Ljung
Report
VTI meddelande nrPrimary
CVM-studie av
Report
VTI notat nr 31 - Primary
Berkningsmode
Report
VTI meddelande nrPrimary
Berkningsmode
Report
VTI meddelande nrPrimary
Berkningsmode
Report
VTI meddelande nrPrimary
Berkningsmode
Report
VTI meddelande nrPrimary
Frbifart Os Report
Working paper, ThePrimary
Biltrafikens mReport
p. 75-166, In Expe Review
Couples' WilliJournal
Acta Obstetricia e Primary
The Value of Journal
European Review oSecondary/benefits transfers
Primary and SJournal
Environmental andSecondary/benefits transfers
TrafikimmissioReport
The Swedish Nation
Primary
Vgtrafiken ocReport
Report, DepartmentPrimary
Vrdering av tReport
Report. The Intern Secondary
Ekonomiska ko
Report
Report 3862, The SPrimary
Natural resou Journal
Environmental andSecondary
On the distancJournal
Landscape and UrbPrimary
Using contingThesis
Master thesis, Dep Primary
Elasticities o Journal
Environmental andMeta
DocumentationReport
Smskriftserien noPrimary
SamhllsekonoReport
Report, Centre for Primary
TurskidkarensReport
CTEK Working paper
Primary
Sjrestaureri Doctoral thesis Thesis, Lund Economic Studies
Ekonomiska ko
Report
Report TEM, LundPrimary
Guld och grnReport
In Rkna med miljn! Frslag till
SamhllsekonoReport
Review
Appendix to Sveriges
kostnader fr kvveutslpp, en delrap
Recreation valJournal
Journal of Enviro Secondary
derqvist, T.
2006
2009
A. Haworth an1999
1993
1996
2001
1998
2001
2001
2003
1992
1993
1994
1992
1988
1989
1989
1989
1995
1996
attsson, Leif
1988
yquist, Hans
1993
1990
1996
1997
Gerdtham, U. 1993
1997
1989
1990
1990
1993
1993
1997
1998
1998
hansson, Siv
1993
1992
1990
2009
2000
2004
1988
1998
1987
1987
1995
1994
2001
2001
2002
Heldt, Tobias 2001
1999
1997
2000
2001
ellaert, Benedict
2001
Jarlebring, Is 2003
iasson, Jonas
2002
2004
2006
2006
2006
2005
2001
2006
1994
1990
1987
1993
1994
rker, Thomas
1994
1999
1998
2003
2001
A. Longo, A. 2006
1993
2004
J. Clench-Aas,1999
2001
2000
2001
2003
2003
2003
1991
n association with TME a 2000
1996
SamhllsekonoReport
DsK 1987:6, MinistPrimary
Vrdering av lReport
Report 1995:5, Th Primary
On ReconciliaDoctoral thesis In Chuan-Zhoung Primary
Li (1994),
BetalningsviljReport
Forskning frn LinkPrimary
Ekonomisk vrThesis
Master Thesis in EPrimary
Combining Con
Report
Arbetsrapport 329,Primary
Skiers and snoReport
Working paper 200Primary
Ekonomisk vrd
Report
Department of ApplPrimary
Br vi dricka Thesis
Rapport 109, Insti Secondary
Health costs oLicentiate thesis Licentiate thesis, Secondary
Emns nyttjanReport
VASTRA report 2, Primary
Tourism DevelJournal
Annals of Tourism Primary
Vrdering av iReport
Report, Transek, S Primary
Vrdet av boenReport
Report, Transek, S Review
Destination A Working paper
WP 2004:02, EuropPrimary
Anglers valuatConference paper IFTET 2006 PortsmPrimary
A Multi-AttribJournal
Journal of Leisure Primary
Swedish Consu
Journal
AgBioForum (The Primary
J
The Value of Dissertation/thesisChapter in doctora Primary
Air Pollution Journal
Risk Analysis 21, Primary
20 Years of S Conference paper Norwegian UniversMeta/synthesis analysis
Attityder till Thesis
Master thesis 126, Primary
Hunting in SwJournal
Scandinavian JournPrimary
The EconomicJournal
Scandinavian JournPrimary
The Non-Timbe
Journal
Scandinavian JournPrimary
How do differeJournal
Journal of Enviro Primary
Statens milj Report
Department of industrial environme
Costing an IntJournal
Ecological EconomSecondary/benefits transfers
Externalities Report
Stockholm Environm
Primary
Variations in Report
VTI notat 36A- 200Primary
Economic ValuJournal
Ecological
Meta/synthesis
analysis
HEATCO -Econom
Developing
Harmonised
European Approaches
Economic value
Report (governme
Primary
Linbanan i NorThesis
Master
thesis
in Department
Primary of Economics, School of Econ
Licentiate
thesis,
Stated
Prefer
Dissertation/thesis
Gteborg
University.
Primary
Dioxide,
Nitrogen
Dioxide and Fine
and Suspended
Particulate
Matter in Cities
Journal
Environmental andSecondary/benefits transfers
Sportfisket i Report
Arbetsrapport 300, Department of
Ekonomisk anal
Report
Arbetsrapport 290,Primary
Sportfisket i Report
Arbetsrapport 305,Primary
Valuation of Report
Arbetsrapport 335,Primary
Marginal ValuReport
Arbetsrapport 333,Primary
Recreational Report
Arbetsrapport 334,Primary
The Value of Working paper
Swedish Institute Primary
Technical RepReport (governme RIVM report 4815Meta/synthesis analysis
Recreational bReport
Working Paper No Primary
1991
1991
hlgrd, Bengt
1994
1995
1995
1995
1995
1996
1996
1994
2001
2000
1987
2000
1996
2002
2002
1999
2002
1991
2003
1996
1992
2003
2003
1999
2000
2005
Soutukorva, 2005
1987
Geertz-Hansen2000
2001
2001
2001
Loo, Lars-Ove2009
F. Wulff, S. B 1999
G. Gudbergsso2004
1997
1997
2000
2000
2000
Lindqvist, Jo 1993
2003
ergman, Lars
2005
1997
2005
1991
1988
a/synthesis analysis
REC
DE
CVM
CVM
CVM, TCM
CVM
CVM
CVM
TCM
See B4, B5
See also B2, B5
See also B2, B4
See B5
* See also B12
a/synthesis analysis
a/synthesis analysis
See also B9
ndary/benefits transfers
RC
Count data models This study uses an econometric model to e
The
authors undertook
a thorough
review of
Agricultural
Research provided
funding.
CVM
CE
CVM
CE
See C3
a/synthesis analysis
a/synthesis analysis
See D6
CVM
TCM
CVM
CE
CE
CE
CE
See also L5
CVM
RC
CVM
See F5 for the questionnaireCVM
See F4
See H6, F4
HP /(CVM)
CVM
ndary/benefits transfers
See also G4
CVM
CVM
LT1, L1, G12, G6 and G7
Follow up of previous CVMCVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
See also G8
CVM
ndary/benefits transfers
ndary/benefits transfers
CVM
CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
Pilot study
CVM
RC
CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
Cost of planting oaks as a substitute for
Personal interviews, double-bounded DC
TCM
*
*
RC
CVM
ndary/benefits transfers
See also K6
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CE
CE, CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
Mail questionnaire, OE
CVM
Mail questionnaire
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
The survey was conduced by a professional
The survey was conducted by a survey fir
The National Corporation of Swedish Pharma
Telephone interviews were administered t
CVM
CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
Mail questionnaire, OE, DC
CVM
Mail questionnaire, DC
CVM
Mail questionnaire, DC
CVM
CE
*
See also M3
See K6
See K2
See K1
a/synthesis analysis
ndary/benefits transfers
See also G8
See also G8
CVM
CVM
CVM
See also L2
See also F1
a/synthesis analysis
*
ndary/benefits transfers
*
a/synthesis analysis
Political WTP
Political WTP
CVM
CVM
CVM
SP and CVM
CVM, CM
Political WTP
REC, PF
CM
SP
CE
CE
CE
CE
CE
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
CVM
REC
Averting behavior
CVM
CVM
CVM
SP
TCM
CE
CVM
TCM
CVM
Mail questionnaire
Mail questionnaire, zonal method
Mail questionnaire, 20 sets * 2 alternative
Mail questionnaire, DC
Mail questionnaire, zonal method
The study was conducted in Autumn 1986 an
The Benefit Assessment section of the rep
Data from the tourism and travel databa
ndary/benefits transfers
See P6
a/synthesis analysis
See G5 for a CBA
TCM
S2b
S2a
See also S2
CVM
CVM
Mail questionnaire, OE
Mail questionnaire, OE
HP
CVM
Mail questionnaire, DC
CVM
CVM
TCM
PF
HCM/Political WT
CVM
CVM
CE
CE
PF
RC
See K6
CVM
CVM
TCM
TCM
CVM
CVM
HP
SP
Political WTP/DE
CVM, costs
ndary/benefits transfers
*
CVM
CVM
CVM
HP
HP
See W2
SP
CE
a/synthesis analysis
See 2
See also 1
CE
CVM
TCM
DE
Market prices
Preservation
n/r
Preserving the wolf in Sweden
n/r
Swedish house ownEnvironmental attributes associat Noise (dB 30, 40), Location (mounta
Coastal water quality
Sweden
Swedish citizens a The white-backed woodpecker, anIncrease in population density (thre
Martebomiren/r
Ecosystem services provided by Ecosystem services lost due to explo
Laholm Bay Residents of Bsta Water quality
50 % reduction of the nutrient emi
Femundsmarka
Swedish visitors in Trip/visit to the study area (mounn/r
Gta(SJFR).
kanal 160,800
n/r
Gta Kronor),
kanal age 43 years and 51Distance
to the
Gta
kanal
ultural Research
(1992 Swedish
percent of
sample,
and the Swedish population
as a whole, were females.Increase in population density (thre
Passive uses
Australia, Japan, New Zealand,Built environment
The optimal degree of sea level rise
The Stockhon/r
Wetlands
The motorway
Households in selecEnvironmental encroachment in aThe alternative of construing the ro
The road, SResidents in MlnlyEnvironmental encroachment in aThe alternative of construing the ro
Ljungskile, Residents of LjungsEnvironmental effects of a moto An alternative location of the moto
Malm, the TIndividual between Traffic
Reduction in traffic congestion
Huskvarna Residents in the st Encroachment of a physical barrieReplacing the road/railway with a t
Hllviken Residents in the st Encroachment of a physical barrieReplacing the road/railway with a t
Rttvik
Residents in the st Encroachment of a physical barrieReplacing the road/railway with a t
Ulricehamn Residents in the st Encroachment of a physical barrieReplacing the road/railway with a t
The motorwaHouseholds nearby Encroachment from a road
Replacing the road E66 with the alt
Gteborg
Human health
Six, four, and three in-vitro fertili
Gotland
The study populatioecological functions, extractive Information provided on baseline con
Sweden, UnVisitors and non-vi ecological functions, non extractive uses
Roslags Nsbn/r
Traffic noise
Different noise levels relative to th
Sweden
n/r
Carbon dioxide emissions and othn/r
Sweden
n/r
Sweden
Swedish citizens Distance to recreational forests An increase in the distance to the re
The national city park Ulriksdal-Haga-Brunnsviken-Djurgrden
Sweden
Swedes aged 16-74Agricultural landscape
Preservation of landscape elements: (
The nationaln/r
The ecosystem service provided bn/r
Grvelsjn, Skiers visiting Gr The negative externality of snow Separation of trails
Recreational benefits of lake restoration
Lake Vombsj
n/r
The effect of water quality on re Three scenarios: (1) decrease in the
Forests, the non-timber value
n/r
Sweden
Swedes
Sweden
Sweden
Various
Non extractive uses, passive use No change
Sweden
Swedish householdEnvironmental attributes affectedThe attributes in this choice-exper
Ireland, Norway, Sweden, U built environment, human health
Iceland, No The authors used daecological functions, extractive uses, non extractive uses, passive
The proposedHouseholds in the aEncroachment in a green area / barLocating the road in a tunnel
The road SrHouseholds in the aEncroachment in a green area / barLocating the road in a tunnel
Sweden
n/r
Motor vehicle exhaust emissions
Gothenburg n/r
Effects of exhaust emissions in u n/r
Sweden
Swedish citizens a The white-backed woodpecker, anIncrease in population density (thre
Gta kanal Tourists visiting th Gta Kanal
n/r
Gta Kanal Two target populatiGta Kanal
Preservation of Gta Kanal
Jmtland Anglers
Angling site
CVM: a doubling of average catch
Jmtland moLocal population, sSki recreation
Separation of trails
Sweden
n/r
Effects of exhaust emissions, damn/r
Four fishing Swedish anglers thaAttributes of fishing sites: type o Type of water (river), species (trou
Kaitum RiveSwedish anglers thaRecreational fishery in the river n/r
Kaitum RiveAnglers that visite Attributes of angling sites: numb Catch per day of Grayling < 30 cm (
The county Swedish anglers in Fish catch in recreational fishing A doubling of catch compared to the
The county Swedish anglers in Recreational fishery
n/r
8) 50% reduction in own and passenger's annua
Study population isHuman health
Austria, Germany, Hungary, ecological functions, non extractive uses, passive uses
Laholm Bay Si wedes
Eutrophication effects on seaside 50% reduction of the nutrient load
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Swedes aged betweEutrophication of the Baltic Sea Eutrophication is decreased to a leve
Stockholm Residents of Brom Bromma airport
Total shutdown
Stockholm aInhabitants in the Water quality
1-metre improvement of mean sight
Sweden
n/r
Natural resource damage from then/r
Sweden
n/r
Methyl mercury in fish
n/r
Stockholm aInhabitants in the Water quality
1-metre improvement of mean sight
Swedish car Potential car buyer Environmentally protective enginn/r
Sweden
Swedish house-ownEnvironmental impacts arising froDownstream water level (status quo,
Sweden
Swedish non-resideEnvironmental impacts arising fr Downstream water level (status quo,
Sweden
n/r
The waterco n/r
Vxj, LinkResidents in Vxj (A) Traffic emissions, (B) Green (A) 50% reduction (B)+(c)+(D) diffe
tudy was acquired using The
a study populatioExtractive uses
The extent of change examined in thi
n/r
Air quality
Fish
human health
Forests
Forests
Forests
Animals/Plants
Mountain
Sustainable forests
180 Non-rando
Sustainable forests
(A) 236 (B) 2 Distributed
Sustainable forests
2500 Random samp
A magnificent mountain landscape 300 trips
TDB respond
Wetland
global
wetlands/constructed wetlands
wetlands/constructed wetlands
trees, woodland
Wetland
Wetland
Air quality
Environment in general
Sustainable forests
n/r
192 Registered
See column NSee column
282 househol Non-rando
Agricultural land
Mountain
Agricultural land
Manmade environment
Water quality, Fish
n/r
92 Random sa
270 Random sa
Random sa
1000 Random samp
Animals/Plants
Wetland
Water quality
Mountain
Sustainable forests
Thriving wetlands
n/r
Zero eutrophication, A balanced m
A magnificent mountain landscape
Water quality
Flourishing lakes and streams
Birds, endangered species
Beach, wetlands/constructed wetlands, flood control/dams
2880 Random sa
n/r
500 Random sa
1016 A selection
n/r
Sales price
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
Wetland
n/r
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Human health
wetlands/constructed wetlands,
wetlands/constructed wetlands,
Manmade environment
Air quality
Forests
Sustainable forests
Agricultural land
Animals/Plants
Mountain
Water quality
Water quality
Forests
n/r
500 Random sa
Birds, trees
Fish
regional, buildings, crops, trees, human health
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
he Swedish government budget
Environment in general
Environment in general
Animals/Plants
Air quality
n/r
500 househol Random sa
Sustainable forests
200 Random sa
Clean air, A good built environment
Forests
Sustainable forests
80 Random sa
Forests
Human health
Human health
Human health
Human health
Sustainable forests
200 Random sa
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
Air quality
Forests
Clean air
Sustainable forests
800 Random sa
1100, divided Random sa
Water quality
Manmade environment
Forest
Fish, birds, river attributes
global, buildings, other assets, human health
fresh water, fish
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
n/r
1000 ?
750 ?
See column NSee column
1500 Random
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
200 householdRandom sa
124 househol Random sa
Air quality
Air quality
Forests
Water quality
Water quality
Fish
Mountain
Air quality
Clean air
n/r
n/r
Clean air
n/r
n/r
Sustainable forests
(A) OE: 480. Random sa
Flourishing lakes and streams
?
Non-rando
Flourishing lakes and streams
3000 Random samp
Flourishing lakes and streams
200 Random samp
A magnificent mountain landscape Snowmobile vis
The residen
Clean air
n/r
n/r
Water quality
Mountain
Manmade environment
salt water
Water quality
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Human health
preservation of agricultural land, wetlands/constructed wetlands,
Water quality
Zero eutrophication, A balanced m
200 Choice-bas
106 On-site sam
64 (year 2000?
More than 20 Choice-bas
More than 20 ?
See column NSee column
See column NSee column
3169 trips
TDB respond
Fish
Water quality
1000 Random sa
1000 Random sa
Manmade environment, Air qualA good built environment, Clean ai(a) About 300(a) all in
Manmade environment, Air qualA good built environment, Clean ai500 househol Random sa
Water quality
Manmade environment
696 Random sa
1000 Random sa
Water quality
Forests, Agricultural land
Water quality, Fish
Water quality
Air quality
Water quality
Water quality
Water quality
Water quality, Fish
n/r
n/r
Other assets
Global, endangered species, rain forest, human health
Fish
Fish
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Fish
Flourishing lakes and streams
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Manmade environment
A good built environment
Fish
salt water
fish
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Manmade environment
Human health
Human health
trees, woodland
Manmade environment, Air qualA good built environment, Clean ai317 househol Non-random,
Response rate Year of data Payment vehicle Economic measure Estimated values
n/r
1994 n/r
RC
RC in total 1200-6
n/r
1994 n/r
71%
See column N "Sp
96%
30%
1991
(A) 33% (B) 31
1992
61% 1993/1994
n/r
1992
Other
60 billion US dolla
65%
85%
1089 interviews
56%
WTP
WTP
WTP
Price, cost of injur
Price, CS
2002
WTP
2002 The project is fina WTP marginal
2000
WTP
60%
n/r
67.4%
74.4%
1993
1989
1996
1999
?
WTP mean, median Median WTP 466.
n/r
RC
Annual RC: 2.5-7 m
A monthly tax on t WTP mean, median, co
Mean annual WTP:
Payment for the tri WTP, CS
Maximum WTP for the
n/r
January 1996 n/r
See column N "Sp
1993
See column N "Sp
1990
n/r
1993 n/r
Other
(A)71%, (B)69%
68%
1987 (A) one-time paymeWTP mean, median (A) mean WTP: 464
1988 Annual increase in WTP mean, median OE: Mean WTP 371
32 per reduced kg o
WTP
Other
Cost of injury/repla
WTP
WTP aggregate
n/r
Other
1988 n/r
48%
1982 n/r
WTP
Increase in WTP: SE
n/r
1990 n/r
Other
67%
1987 Annual payment toWTP, CV, Jobs lost Mean annual WTP: 4500. Number of job
61%
1989 ?
WTP mean, median Mean WTP: 1200 per
1988 Contribution to pr WTP mean, CV
Mean WTP: (A) 1275
46.4%
1986 ?
WTP, EV
(1) a reduction of
75%
See column N "Sp
See column N "Sp
See column N "Sp
See column N "Sp
WTP mean, EV
WTP
CS, WTP
WTP
EV, WTP
74%
67%
73%
1992 An annual charge fWTP mean, median Mean WTP 1500, Median WTP 0
42%
WTP mean
n/r
n/r
(A) 45%, (B) 6
Personal intervi
53.2 % in the fi
67%
Snowmobiles: 63
n/r
1987
1995
1993
1999
1999
1998
2001
1999
n/r
Other
15-25 SEK/kg NOx,
n/r
Other
1 SEK/kg CO2, 40-4
?
WTP mean, median OE: Mean WTP 765
For the group cycliWTP mean, median, stTourist mean WTP:
Annual payment foWTP mean, median, t1:st sub-sample: Mean WTP of 100-225
Licence fee
WTP mean, confidence
Mean WTP in CVM
Daily fee (dagkort)WTP mean
CVM: mean WTP 33, C
n/r
Other
20 SEK/kg CO2, 60
n/r
Residents: 61% V
(A) 49%, (B) 46
n/r
Total economic value230-240 million
1999 Visitors: increase i WTP/WTA mean
"for" residents' m
2002 Monthly housing cWTP mean
Mean WTP per month
67%
1998
72%
1999
2000: 75%, 20012001/2002
70%
1998
70%
1998
See column N "Sp1987, 1986
See column N "Sp
87, 1986, 1985
n/r
1990-1994
Licence fee
n/r
Extra fee per day
A extra fee
n/r
n/r
WTP marginal
MWTP for an extra f
CS
CS 166 per fishing
WTP, marginal, confiWTP of an extra sma
WTP marginal
Marginal WTP for an
CS, per angling day, pCS per fishing day
WTP
Table 1 provides est
WTP
Table 1 summarizes the results of an exte
CS
CS: (A) 12-32 mill
65.3%
67.5%
n/r
1989 Tax
1989 Tax
60.4%
67%
1998: 47.2%, 19
1998
n/r
1995
n/r
1987
47.2%
1998
Potential car bu 1994/1995
40%
2002
29%
2002
n/r
n/r
n/r
CS aggregate
Time is not valued:
n/r
PS
Total damage 736 mi
n/r
HCM: 2.46-27.06 mi
Higher prices of ta WTP mean, median, stMean monthly WTP:
(A) Extra payment WTP
a
mean, median (A) mean WTP 6856
Increase in electri WTP marginal
MWTP, re per kWh:
Increase in electri WTP marginal
MWTP, re per kWh:
1991 n/r
1995 n/r
Other
RC
WTA/WTP
WTP
CS
The willingness to
Table 1 presents me
The estimated consumer surplus per trip
n/r
WTP median
1986 n/r
Adjusted values
No
No
54.23 SEK per additional fishing day
le 1 for estimated mean and media
Mean and median willingness to pay values were a function of the results of the dichotomou
CVM: WTP as a function
Yes
Yes of household income per capita or household income, environmen
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dependent variable: WTP. Independent variables: travel distance, number of persons in the
Regression analysis with increase in WTP for the tourist trip as dependent variable. Explana
Dependent variable: DC bid. Independent variables: attitudes toward the importance of natu
Dependent variable: TC. Independent variables: number of household members who made a
analysis there were several scen The model used in this analysis is entitled E3ME. This is an econometric, dynamic, simulati
The
per
hectare
of
wetlands
1995
US Dollars
is a to
function
of three
groups
of indepe
found an
over-all
transferlevels
error
of
74%,
where
low
values
werein
systematically
over-estimated,
the value
of high
valu
lhors
abatement
costs
for different
model
ofvalue
abatement.
description.
The
Shadow
prices
are
calculated
and
used
test and
re all in 1992 prices.
the influence of the defined restrictions.
reational value (2005 Swedish kron
Recreation values of the forest landscapes weighted by the four different management chara
Yes
Dependent variable: WTP Independent variables: age, education, income
Yes
Conditional logit and random parameter logit models. Variables: high biodiversity, medium
Yes
Dependent variable: WTP. Independent variables: individual income, partner income, house
Test differences in preferences between a hypoth
and "fly often from Bromma", female and lives in detached house. Model
coefficients are estimated using a mixed logit model.
Yes
Yes
The marginal willingness to pay is estimated for the following attributes in the choice exper
Yes
The willingness to pay for having the weed cut is estimated as a function of the following in
reports the externality costs for incineration of waste for three different types of facilities. Table 2 reports the externality cos
presents the total annual value o Estimated values reported in the study are per unit area of each ecosystem service for each e
Yes
Yes
Yes
Regression analysis of WTP with income, age, sex, born in the area, permanent resident and
Dependent variable: travel frequency. Independent variables: cost per hunting day, supply of
A regression model of WTP was estimated. Independent variables: household income, age, l
Yes
Random effects binary Probit model with the following variables: noise, location: mountain
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Regression analysis with the following indeIn addition 480 individuals received a OE-questi
Regression analysis of WTP. Explanatory variables: sex,Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of
Dependent variable: maximum WTP for a visit in the study area. Independent variables: dist
See F4 and H6
Yes
Four different
models
estimated,
lineaModel
Only the
hedonic study
income
per person
andwere
population
density.
coefficients
wereis summarized here
estimated using a probit model.
Yes
ults with respect to the optimal d A cost function for the damage from sea level rise is calculated as a function of the cost-min
No
No
No
Yes
Couples were asked to state the number of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) / embryo transfer (ET)
ults presented in the table are in
ults of the Broadland study are detailed in Table 1. The estimate of the monetary replacement costs indicates that the annual (
Yes
Regression analysis was estimated with house prices as dependent variable. Independent var
No
No
Yes
Regression analysis of the probability of giving a positive WTP bid to avoid an increase in t
Yes
No
Yes
Regression models of WTP. Independent variables: gender, resident in northern counties, res
Yes
Dependent variable: WTP, Independent variables: value of the first bid, education, protest an
No
The environmental debt of Uppsala
WTP as a function of the stated motives for paying for programme A: use values, use values
Yes
WTP as a function of the stock of moose, price of moose meat, tax wage rate, income, numb
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dependent variable: WTP for the next hunting season. Independent variables: Number of m
A logistic model
form
is used
to model the
probability
of accepting
func
Willingness
to pay
values
are estimated
to reflect
income
and qualitythe
ofbid
lifeamount
attainedasatadiffe
Four willingness to pay equations were estimated. Equation 1: willingness to pay as a funct
The probability of accepting the insurance premium bid was modeled as a function of the in
Yes
Regression of WTP. Independent variables: gender, age, income, annual driving distance, ex
an WTP 1023 , median WTP 200 per household. DC: mean WTP 2500, median WTP 1130 per household.
No
Pilot study
Yes
Yes
A conditional logit model and a random parameter logit are estimated with the parameters: a
provides a summary of the estimated ancillary benefits of carbon taxes due to reduced air pollution and traffic externalities b
error from benefits transfer betwThe authors formed a probability density function for willingness to pay, and estimated mea
No
No
Valuation of air pollution from air, railway and m
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
WTP as a function of: sex, age, children in the household, level of education, environmental
WTP as a function of the following variables: number of household members, number of fis
CVM: Dependent variable: probability of "yes" answer. Independent variables: daily fee, da
The valuation of local health effects was based o
Yes
In this study two functions were estimated one for skiers and one for snowmobilers. The tra
Yes
The willingness to pay is estimated as a funciton of expected catch per day of Grayling and
Yes
The willingness to pay was modeled as a funciton of the64.23 SEK per extra fish
Yes
The coefficients of the attributes in the choice experiment (different levels of type of housin
Yes
The dependent variable in the conditional logit model is "ski visits". The independent variab
nately, the value of a year of lost The cost of pollution is modeled as a function of the value of a year of lost life, the duration
del results are promising with rega
To analyse the impact on WTP of the explanatory variables above, the following standard m
Yes
Regression model of WTP was estimated. Explanatory variables: number of household mem
No
Total hunting value was also divided into meat v
Yes
Regression analysis of WTP/WTA. Explanato
Total moose hunting value was also divided into
Yes
Regression analyses were made between the
The
r non-timber value was also decomposed into
Yes
The non-timber value is a function of the type of forest landscape (4 different) and the share
shows the mean per capita willingness to pay for nutrient abatement in each of the Baltic Countries.
shows the payment scheme into nutrient
Mean willingness
abatement to
forpay
thefor
Baltic
nutrient
Sea countries.
abatement among the Baltic countries was a function o
No
1 to 6 present the biodiversity values obtained from 61 representative biodiversity valuation studies under various categories.
After experimenting with different distributional assumptions F for WTP, the study settled f
No
The questionnaire
was also handed out to foreign
respondent supports a non-governmental organization).
The coefficients
were
using
maximum
likelihoodwas
techniques.
tudies from Yes
research studies including
max) estimated
ExternE
the required
1995a,
reduction
of emissions
calculated.
93 and Metroeconomica 1996.
Yes
Valuation function with the following independent varia22.05 per extra fish
Yes
Dependent variable: travel frequency. Independent varia228.77 SEK per additional fishing d
Yes
ML-model was estimated with the following
Four potenti127.01 SEK per extra fish
Yes
A model with a bid variable and 5 variables for the cat Five types of angling were analyzed
Yes
Dependent variable:
frequency.
Independent
Five
types oftoangling
were
Double-log
ordinary travel
least square
(OLS)
regressionsvaria
were
estimated
examine
theanalyzed
effect of
Yes
summarizes the results of an exteThe per person per year value for each of the habitats were derived by selecting only compa
Yes
Dependent variable: indirect utility from visiting a sit stersjn: Mean WTP for reducing o
Yes
Yes
A regression analysis of WTP. Explanatory variables: age, income, capital, sex, owner of fis
A regression analysis of WTP. Explanatory variables: age, income, capital, sex, number of h
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Dependent variable: the choice probability that a site i Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of
The estimate of the damage suffered by Swedish
Yes of a deposit system for collection and recycling of batteries
Regression analysis with WTP as dependent variable. Ex
1998: Mean WTP for reducing one k
Dependent variable: WTP bid. Independent variables in groups: attitudes of respondents, pe
A model of the choice experiment attributes and following socio-economic and attitudinal v
A model of the choice experiment attributes and the following attitudinal and firm-specific v
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Only the Swedish part of the study is summarized
Yes
A base hedonic price model with 69 or 86 variables of house characteristics. This base mode
No
No
No
40 SEK per extra kilo and 55 SEK p
shows estimates of aggregate benefits for the total economic value of a Baltic Sea nutrient reduction strategy. Data from the P
reports aggregate values for ann Fishing expenditures, extra willingness to pay (WTP) for the same fishing experience and W
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
The willingness to pay and willingness to accept compensation for changed transports of ha
Yes
The probability of being willing to pay the specified bid amount to continue hormone replac
mated consumer surplus per trip Two meta analysis models based on different dependent variables were estimated: the natura
Yes
, number of persons in the household, part of experience derived form Risebo area, part of experience of Risebo derived from
ependent variable. Explanatory variables (all are dummy variables): stand density more and less, proportion of broad leaved
ward the importance of nature conservation in general and the existence of wolves in Sweden, gender and presented wolf pop
ehold members who made a skiing trip, average age of household, number of persons under 12 years old in household, house
nometric, dynamic, simulation model estimated using econometric panel-data techniques on cross-section and annual time-ser
on of three groups of independent variables: study characteristics (such as valuation technique and marginal value); wetland p
different management characteristics were compared for reference and alternative cases. The difference in value was determi
high biodiversity, medium biodiversity, fish, fenced waterline, crayfish, walking facilities, intercept, surrounding vegetation m
ome, partner income, household wealth, number of children, education, serious disease, pollution knowledge, retired, membe
eferences between a hypothetical and an actual choice experiment
tributes in the choice experiment: 1. Chicken - a) growth, b) genetically modified producs in fodder (banned or not given info
function of the following independent variables: housing area nearby the lake, bathing place, canoe track, boat place, control
2 reports the externality costs for landfilling wastes for two different types of facilities. For incineration, total external costs r
cosystem service for each ecosystem type. Estimated unit values were either the sum of consumer and producer surplus for th
s: noise, location: mountain or off-shore, height, small group, large group, large group located offshore, small group located in
multinomial
ent variables are: FISH (the level of cod in the sea), WATER (improvement of bathing water quality from the worst to the bes
are shown in the table below.
duals received a OE-question (total sample 3360). The data derived from the OE-question was not analysed in this study. See
TP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 35.28 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 1751.23 SEK per kg.
Independent variables: distance to home, days in the study area, household income, prior visits, wilderness experience, puris
dy
ereis summarized here
s a function of the cost-minimizing combination of protection cost and damage per se (dry and wetland loss). Analytically, a c
ontains a general calculation model for encroachment costs of infrastructure investments. (A)adjacent area (B) the municip
he municipality
d and railway in a tunnel (B) only the road in a tunnel and (c)only the railway in a tunnel.
he municipality
IVF) / embryo transfer (ET) treatments they would undergo at various prices. Willingness to pay (WTP) for treatment was de
s indicates that the annual (undiscounted) cost of replacing the Martebo mire's lost life support functions is about 2.5-7 millio
nt variable. Independent variables were: noise (dB), experienced noise, housing attributes (15 attributes), house located in Ro
bid to avoid an increase in the distance to the forest. Independent variables: present distance to forest, age, household income
ent in northern counties, resident in southern counties, income inflated into 1994-values, farmer, city, long education, age and
rst bid, education, protest answers, experienced skier, accommodation, household income.
6 for benefits to agriculture, Table 7 for benefits to materials, Table 8 for benefits to forests and Table 9 for benefits to visibil
espondent stated their WTP in terms of time. Questionnaire 2: the respondents stated their WTP in SEK
ebt of Uppsala
ax wage rate, income, number of kilos of meat the hunter obtains, number of days used for hunting and the hunter's motive fo
ent variables: Number of moose the hunter expects to kill and the variance of that variable, expected value of the moose meat
ng the
function ages.
of theThe
bid,quality
age, income,
gender. to
The
data were
analyzed
in accordance
with
th
ality
ofbid
lifeamount
attainedasatadifferent
of life education,
is measuredand
according
a ranking
scale
administered
to survey
resp
willingness to pay as a function of the bid amount (estimated including observations in which respondents answered the contin
deled as a function of the insurance premium bid, perceived quality of life, age, income, education, and gender. The equation
annual driving distance, experience of recovery systems, children, dependent on having a car, holds account with a gasoline
mated with the parameters: alternative specific constant (not choosing opt out), male, age, label, member of environmental org
n and traffic externalities based on a number of studies conducted in Norway, Sweden, and the UK. The estimated values ran
s to pay, and estimated mean willingness to pay by multiplying the integral of the probability density function by the percent o
tion from air, railway and martime traffic based on value estimates derived in L3
l health effects was based on secondary data derived from contingent valuation studies.
ved from the DC-question
of education, environmental interest, number of canal visits and planned future canal visits.
old members, number of fishing days last year, part of total household income, accessibility to site from car-road, bag limit p
dent variables: daily fee, days spent in the study area within the past three years and reported disturbance by snowmobiles.
l health effects was based on secondary data.
ndent variables: number of slopes, tax, income, dependence of household income on tourism, general statement for/against to
e for snowmobilers. The trail chosen to ski or snowmobile was modeled as a function of distance to the trail, the cost of trial
ch per day of Grayling and Brown Trout, bag-limit per day of each species, whether or not the dam at Storsj is removed and
K per extra fish
ent levels of type of housing, castration, tailing docking, fixation and cost) are estimated using a binary heteroskedastic mode
ts". The independent variables are: distance, travel + time cost, fee cost, shelter, scenery and different levels of snowmobile p
ear of lost life, the duration of exposure, and the concentration of exposure. 38 equations in all are used to detail the dose res
e, the following standard meta-regression model is applied. A number of m (m = 1,...,Ms) WTP estimates are identified from
number of household members, household income, place of residence, and attitudes towards the use of biocides.
as also divided into meat value and recreation value
value was also divided into meat value and recreational value
was also decomposed into on-site consumptive use, on-site non-consumptive use and off-site experience.
e (4 different) and the shares of the tree species pine, spruce, birch and other broadleaves
c countries was a function of the results of contingent valuation surveys performed in three of the ten countries (Poland, Swed
s under various categories. Table 1 present the market value of bioprospecting contracts signed between pharmaceutical and a
for WTP, the study settled for a two-parameter Weibull distribution.
sficients
also handed out to foreigner visitors, but data about Swedish visitors are only reported here.
ed by selecting only compatible studies (i.e., studies using a similar method of estimation) and converting the WTP figures to
n: Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 13.01 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 675.14 SE
e, capital, sex, owner of fishing-waters, number of fishing days per year, number of household members, number of househo
e, capital, sex, number of household members, level of education and children under the age of 1 years old
s: standard of house, age of house, living area, lot size, local tax rate, travel time by car to Stockholm city, time trend for date
, children under the age of 7 years old, level of education, intention to move from the house during the current year, subjectiv
n WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 12.64 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 382.39 SEK per
TP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 46.24 SEK per kg and mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 1408.89 SEK per
amage suffered by Swedish moose hunters was based on secondary data, see reference H5
cycling of batteries
ean WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 210.74 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 6420.49 SEK
attitudes of respondents, personal and household characteristics, ability to pay and car practices.
-economic and attitudinal variables: whether the respondent regularly buys green products, regularly fish for recreation, prefe
titudinal and firm-specific variables: environmental impact of hydropower, the firms environmental concern, interest in buyi
sts, animals and air pollution - was modeled as a function of age, income, gender, if willingness-to-pay estimation was consid
K per extra kilo
K per extra kilo, 15.79 SEK per extra fish and 102.67 SEK per additional fishing day
or changed transports of hazardous materials was estimated as a function of number of wagons, hazardousness, time of transp
to continue hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was modeled as a function of the initial bid amount, the difference in the res
s were estimated: the natural log of consumer surplus and the consumer surplus normalized for size of forest. The consumer
measures. Independent variables: income, radon concentration, perceived cost of mitigation, children, age of adult, neighbour
istical model that the author assumed the willingness to pay data follows. Statistical models included: normal; logistic; weibu
erience of Risebo derived from the forest, household income, part of experience derived from fishing and the probability of re
s, proportion of broad leaved trees more or less, size of clearcuts big/few and small/many, tree age older and younger, and acc
ender and presented wolf population dummy for 100, 700 and 1000 wolves.
years old in household, household income, number of overnight stays, level of education for responding household member, m
ss-section and annual time-series data 1970-1995. It is an integrated E3 model covering 19 regions of Western Europe (the EU
nd marginal value); wetland physical and geographic characteristics (such as wetland type, functions, continent, and latitude)
fference in value was determined to the measure of the additional recreation value of conducting the transformation from the
cept, surrounding vegetation meadow land, cost, male, age and kid.
n knowledge, retired, member of an environmental organisation, big city, house owner, nature knowledge, age and nature imp
dder (banned or not given information about), c) out summer, d) mobile slaughter house. 2. Beef - a) improved labelling, b) g
noe track, boat place, control of weed in remaining parts of the lake and cost for the household. The coefficients were estima
neration, total external costs range from 28 Euros/tonne of waste incinerated for the most modern plant to 77 Euros/tonne for
er and producer surplus for the service, the producer surplus for the service alone, or the service price times the service quan
lues in the agricultural production and attitudes towards preserving the agricultural landscape
ffshore, small group located in mountainous area, visit mountains, price change per kWh, member of an environmental organ
ality from the worst to the best level) and BIODIVERSITY (different levels of biodiversity). Model coefficients are estimated
wetland loss). Analytically, a cost function for the damage from sea level rise can be obtained by substituting the optimal valu
y (WTP) for treatment was derived from the median number of treatments at different prices. Maximum WTP to have a child
unctions is about 2.5-7 millions of SEK. The values of investments in wetland, sewage treatment plants and reductions in far
ttributes), house located in Roslags-Nsby or in Lahll and time of house purchase
r, city, long education, age and a preference variable for the environment in general.
ected value of the moose meat and the variance of that variable, a recreational dummy variable
analyzed
in accordance
with
the standardAge-specific
interpretation
of yes responses
anda aparametric
conservative
interpretation
of yes rate
responses.
le administered
to survey
respondents.
willingness
to pay for
reduction
in the hazard
pertaininT
spondents answered the contingent valuation question). Equation 2: willingness to pay as a function of the bid amount (estim
on, and gender. The equation was estimated separately for respondents answering 'yes' and respondents answering 'no' to a qu
holds account with a gasoline company, choice of station dependent on price, considers that only the companies ought to pay,
member of environmental organization, university education, price change, price change* member of environmental organiza
UK. The estimated values ranged from as low as US$2 per ton of carbon reduced to as high as US$3,056. The report noted th
nsity function by the percent of non-zero bids. Using 1000 bootstrap replicates, the authors estimated standard errors for the
ite from car-road, bag limit per day, catch per day, distance to site from residence, congestion, fee per day and no bag-limit a
sturbance by snowmobiles.
eneral statement for/against tourists, preferences for change in the number of tourists in the future, and number of ski days
ce to the trail, the cost of trial use, how well the trials were groomed, whether or not shelters were available, the scenery, and t
am at Storsj is removed and restored. The last independent variable is extra fee per day. The model coefficients are estimate
e ten countries (Poland, Sweden, and Lithuania), and the GDP of each country. The sharing of abatement cost was calculated
between pharmaceutical and agricultural industries and government agencies. Since these values did not include indirect, exi
EK per extra fish. 2. Put and take: 79.66 SEK per extra kilo, 57.88 SEK per extra fish. 3. River angling: 237.04 SEK per extra
persex,
extra
fish and car
73.04
SEK perand
additional
fishingexperience,
day. 2. Put income
and take:
66.15
SEK willingness
per extra kilo,
61.67
SEK per extra
dEK
age,
education,
ownership
use, accident
and
reported
to pay.
Double-log
OLSfir
converting the WTP figures to 1997 Euro. The unweighted average of the WTP values of the selected studies gives the WTP p
kilo of phosphorus 675.14 SEK per kg. Mean WTP for increasing the Secchi depth one meter during the summer 360.26 SEK
members, number of household members who angle in Swedish salt and brackish water, number of household members who
1 years old
kholm city, time trend for date of house sale, dummy variables for: chain houses, terrace houses, basement, furnished attic, ba
ing the current year, subjective radon risk assessment, interest in the study result, household income, gross rateable value of h
f phosphorus 382.39 SEK per kg. DC: Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 82.81 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reduci
phosphorus 1408.89 SEK per kg. Mean WTP for increasing the Secchi depth one meter during the summer 369.13 SEK per p
o of phosphorus 6420.49 SEK per kg. Mean WTP for increasing the Secchi depth one meter during the summer 923.34 SEK p
larly fish for recreation, prefer government provision of green electricity, chose alternative which gave the most value for the
ental concern, interest in buying green electricity, green image, prefer government provision of green electricity, public sector
s-to-pay estimation was considered an easy task; whether the respondent felt confident with stated willingness-to-pay; if non-
ncerned with total economic value, and they contain the same valuation scenario. Table 2 brings together both the costs of pol
ional fisheries were modeled as a function of a range of fishing behaviours and socio-demographic characteristics. General l
certified as being fairly produced, the amount of coffee consumption by the individual, whether or not the individual stated t
hazardousness, time of transportation. Furthermore, the following dummy variables were also included: whether or not the re
mount, the difference in the respondent's quality of life rating with and without the HRT, age, income, household size and educ
size of forest. The consumer surplus was modeled as a function of authorship, site characteristics, methodology used, socioe
ldren, age of adult, neighbour influence and forced-air intake and exhaust ventilation in the house.
ons of Western Europe (the EU plus Norway and Switzerland), with an annual solution 1970-2012 allowing for lagged respon
ctions, continent, and latitude); and socio-economic characteristics of the study population.
g the transformation from the reference to the alternative case. The difference in value was multiplied by the 179000 citizens
knowledge, age and nature important for stated WTP. Three models were estimated.
f - a) improved labelling, b) genetically modified producs in fodder (banned or not given information about), c) out all year, d
The coefficients were estimated using a random bivariat probit model.
rn plant to 77 Euros/tonne for an old plant. However, if coal is the displaced energy source, pollution displacement can bring
e price times the service quantity. Unit values for each ecosystem service were then multipied by global surface area of each e
ber of an environmental organization, windmill near residence, age and choice based on what is best for society.
odel coefficients are estimated using the mixed multinomial logit model.
y substituting the optimal values for the two policy variables - degree of protection and annual increments in height.
rpretation
of yes rate
responses.
Thethroughout
standard interpretation
included
responsesThe
to the
original
question,
while the
conservativ
on
in the hazard
pertaining
one's remaining
life areyes
estimated.
implied
value
of a statistical
life
of an ave
ction of the bid amount (estimated including observations in which respondents answered all of the survey questions). Equat
ondents answering 'no' to a question following the dichotomous choice contingent valuation question asking whether respond
y the companies ought to pay, given less information in the questionnaire, Prajs customer, considers motoring a serious proble
ber of environmental organization, price change*university education, fish, fish*fisherman, bird, bird*bird-watcher, benthic i
US$3,056. The report noted that although the size of these benefits varies a lot, they usually are at least on the same order as t
mated standard errors for the mean willingness to pay values. The authors examined if the intervals for mean willingness to p
ee per day and no bag-limit and residents in the south of Sweden as dummy variables.
re available, the scenery, and the presence of snowmobiles (for skiers function only). Both functions were estimated using a c
odel coefficients are estimated using maximum likelihood techniques.
an then be denoted M=(SUM)Ms, from s=1 to S. The set of k (k = k,..,K) explanatory variables or regressors are further deno
abatement cost was calculated using the Chander-Tulkens model and the mean willingness to pay from each country.
s did not include indirect, existence and moral values of genetic diversity, these values were interpreted as lower bounds of th
angling: 237.04 SEK per extra kilo, 731.79 SEK per extra fish. 4. Coastal angling 15.85 SEK per extra kilo, 6.89 SEK per ex
a kilo,
61.67
SEK per extra
and 114.38
SEK
per additional
fishing
3. River
angling:
206.72
per extra
kilo, 358
ness
to pay.
Double-log
OLSfish
regressions
were
undertaken
to examine
theday.
effect
of different
factors
onSEK
reported
willingness
to
ected studies gives the WTP pp/py for the specific habitat/species. These values were adjusted by the ratio of average EU inc
uring the summer 360.26 SEK per visit. Laholmsbukten: Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 11.07 SEK per kg, me
r of household members who angle in Swedish fresh water, household income and level of education.
basement, furnished attic, basement and furnished attic, special conditions likely to increase market price, special conditions
ome, gross rateable value of house, reduction of rateable value due to presence of radon radiation
per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 2505.94 SEK per kg.
the summer 369.13 SEK per person and year 61.78 SEK per visit.
ing the summer 923.34 SEK per person and year 154.66 SEK per visit. 1999: Mean WTP for reducing one kilo of nitrogen 18
ch gave the most value for the money, could not afford to pay more for green electricity, would rather spend money to make o
green electricity, public sector and electricity cost share
ed willingness-to-pay; if non-human interest is an important motive for willingness-to-pay; if payment is a yearly tax rather th
together both the costs of pollution abatement and related economic benefit estimates in a cost-benefit analysis framework.
hic characteristics. General linear multiple regression models were used, and non-linear relationships were fitted to the mode
r or not the individual stated they were not willing to change their coffee habits, and whether or not they belonged to a non-pr
ncluded: whether or not the respondent owns his or her residence, receives substantial information in the questionnaire, does
come, household size and education. The model was estimated using two different measures of the quality of life, a rating sca
cs, methodology used, socioeconomic characteristics and study characteristics. The natural log of the consumer surplus was
12 allowing for lagged responses and a calibration of the solution using recent data and short-term forecasts 1996-2000.
iplied by the 179000 citizens (between 17 and 74 years) in Vasterbotten. The present value, assuming 100 year period, was a
mation about), c) out all year, d) mobile slaughter house. The coefficients were estimated with a random parameter logit mode
lution displacement can bring the net external costs for the most modern plant down to -43 Euros/tonne (for oil the same plan
y global surface area of each ecosystem type to yield an estimate of global economic totals. All estimated values from the liter
ncrements in height.
uestion,
while the
conservative
interpretation
includedisonly
those yes
responses
to a follow-up
question that asked if respond
e of a statistical
life
of an average
remaining duration
calculated
using
this parameter
and age.
the survey questions). Equation 3: willingness to pay as a function of the bid amount and respondent's perceived change in h
estion asking whether respondents were absolutely certain that they would pay the bid amount.
d, bird*bird-watcher, benthic invertebrates; moderate species richness, benthic invertebrates; high species richness, river-marg
at least on the same order as the gross mitigation costs of climate change.
rvals for mean willingness to pay from the three countries were significantly different from each other. Transfer error was the
or regressors are further denoted xk,ms. Measurements from the same SP study may share many of the same values (for exam
erpreted as lower bounds of the economic value of genetic diversity changes. Tables 2 and 3 present the mean WTP values fo
er extra kilo, 6.89 SEK per extra fish. 5. Guided coastal angling 19.98 SEK per extra kilo, 10.47 SEK per extra fish.
06.72
per extra
kilo, 358.31
per extra
fish and
175.02
SEK per additional
fishing
Coastal experience,
angling 12.40
SEK
ors onSEK
reported
willingness
to pay.SEK
Variables
included
age,
sex, education,
car ownership
andday.
use,4.accident
incom
by the ratio of average EU income per capita to the income levels in the countries where the studies were carried out to get a W
itrogen 11.07 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 549.20 SEK per kg.
arket price, special conditions likely to decrease market price, high radon daughter concentration, lots with special conditions
ducing one kilo of nitrogen 183.60 SEK per kg, mean WTP for reducing one kilo of phosphorus 5593.68 SEK per kg. Mean
ather spend money to make other power sources more environmentally benign, weighted all attributes against each other, gen
ayment is a yearly tax rather than a voluntary payment; if willing to reduce WYP in follow-up question; if WTP is asked only
not they belonged to a non-profit organization. The model was estimated using the random effects binary probit model.
ion in the questionnaire, does not live next to the railway. The model is estimated using both the multinomial logit model and
he quality of life, a rating scale (RS), and a time trade-off (TTO). The RS method asked respondents to indicate their health s
g of the consumer surplus was found to be a superior model in terms of explanatory power.
rm forecasts 1996-2000.
os/tonne (for oil the same plant's net external costs are -9 Euros per tonne). For incineration facilities, damage from air pollut
estimated values from the literature were converted to 1994 U.S. dollars per hectare per year.
question that asked if respondents were totally sure whether they would pay.
ondent's perceived change in health status from therapy (estimated including observations in which respondents answered all
gh species richness, river-margin vegetation and erosion; broad beach with somewhat reduced amount of plant species and bio
h other. Transfer error was the percent difference between the estimated value using benefits transfer, and the true value from
y of the same values (for example year, geographical area, payment vehicle etc) while varying along other dimensions (for ex
esent the mean WTP values for the preservation of single and multiple species, respectively obtained from contingent valuatio
dies were carried out to get a WTP adjusted to EU average. The total benefit of preservation of habitats/species may be derive
n, lots with special conditions likely to increase the market price, lots with special conditions likely to decrease the market pr
s 5593.68 SEK per kg. Mean WTP for increasing the Secchi depth one meter during the summer 804.44 SEK per person and
ributes against each other, gender, monthly household income, children, education and electricity heated house.
uestion; if WTP is asked only for one issue (global warming); if the sample is drawn from the Swedish sample, and if the scen
ilities, damage from air pollution is the largest contributor to external costs. Total external costs for landfills range from 15 to
ich respondents answered all of the survey questions). Equation 4: willingness to pay as a function of the bid amount and res
mount of plant species and biomass growth, river-margin vegetation and erosion; broad beach with high amount of plant spec
ined from contingent valuation (CV) studies. Table 4 links the value of biodiversity to the value of natural habitat conservatio
onal fishing
day. 5. Guided
coastal angling
22.05 by
SEK
per extra
13.78 SEK
percar
extra
fishMarginal
and 158.48
per additiona
eported
risk divided
by the average
risk, adjusted
reported
carkilo,
use versus
average
use).
ratesSEK
of substitution
w
habitats/species may be derived by multiplying the adjusted WTP pp/py with the 365 millions (total EU-15 population).
r 804.44 SEK per person and year 134.68 SEK per visit.
y heated house.
wedish sample, and if the scenario comprised a larger scope of the environmental good. The model specification was semi-log
ithout the HRT. The difference between the two numbers was then divided by 100. The TTO method asked respondents state
s for landfills range from 15 to 20 Euros per tonne (for a modern versus an old site), with pollution displacement negligible.
tion of the bid amount and respondent's perceived change in health status from therapy, gender, age, income, education, and h
with high amount of plant species and biomass growth. The dependent variable is binary indicating the choice of the responde
e of natural habitat conservation obtained using CV method. Table 5 links biodiversity value to the value of protection of natu
and
158.48
per additional
fishing
day. via a two-stage procedure. First, reported risk and income were regressed on age.
arginal
ratesSEK
of substitution
were
examined
ethod asked respondents state how many years of full health would be equivalent to 30 years of life with menopausal symptom
age, income, education, and household size (estimated including observations in which respondents answered all of the surve
he value of protection of natural areas with high tourism and outdoor recreational demand obtained using CV and other altern
ncome were regressed on age. Then, estimated values of risk and income were included in a log-log regression of willingness
life with menopausal symptoms. The full health years was then divided by 30 years to calculate the measure used.
ents answered all of the survey questions). These models were run including and excluding uncertain responses, for a total o
ned using CV and other alternative valuation methods including travel cost and tourism revenues. Table 6 present the biodive
es. Table 6 present the biodiversity values linked to ecosystem functions and ecological services, particularly those relating to
, particularly those relating to soil and wind erosion, water quality, and wetland ecosystem's functions. These values were bas
nctions. These values were based on CV and other methods such as averting behavior, replacement costs, production function
ent costs, production function, and hedonic price. Table 7 presents the range of monetary estimates of biodiversity values. Th
tes of biodiversity values. The range of values depended on the level of life diversity, the biodiversity value type, and the valu
r
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006