Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Association for Asian Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
Journal of Asian Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
in Contemporary
Asia:
ReligiousResurgence
AsianPerspectives
on Capitalism,
theState,
Southeast
and theNew Piety
ROBERT W. HEFNER
Large portionsof East and SoutheastAsia are in the throesof a historically
upsurgein religiousobservanceand association.Many of the
unprecedented
and laitybased than
are inorepopular,voluntary,
new varietiesof religiosity
the religionsof yesteryear.
particiMany are also markedby the heightened
as
otheras
well
on
and
an
women,
well-being
inner-worldly
of
emphasis
pation
to
but
with
on
Southeast
transcendence.
Asia,
references
Focusing
worldly
and
moral
the
social
this
article
examines
in
China,
of
genealogy
developments
easternAsia's religiousvitalization.Many analystshave emphasizedtheinfluence of postcolonialsecularisms,neoliberaldisciplines,and ascendantcivil
societiesin thereligiousresurgence.
Althoughthesefactorshave indeedplayed
the
a role,the macro-narratives
state,capital,and democratization
often
of
and
to
the
microattention
of selffamily,and
meso-passions
giveinsufficient
and proximato
the
have
contributed
which
all
popularization
neighborhood, of
tizationofonce restricted
spiritualdisciplines.
essayconcernsa development
takingplace acrossa broadswathofconAsia:
an
unprecedentedupsurgein religiousritual,association,
temporary
and observance.The resurgencedefiesa centuryof forecastsby secularization
and decline.
theoristsof religionsimminentprivatization
and modernization
Chiefamongthese is that
social characteristics.
The eventalso has distinctive
and laity
the new varietiesof religiontend to be more popular,voluntary,
based than the establishedreligionsof yesteryear.
Many are also markedby
notbyexplicitnormaof
theheightened
participation women,althoughtypically
of genderequality.Last but notleast,some of the new movetiveaffirmations
thanwith
transcendence
mentsalso appearpreoccupiedless withotherworldly
inner-worldly
well-being.
Of course,not all of Asia is being sweptintothisragingreligioustorrent,
and not all new varietiesof religionare popular,prosperityminded, or
Two generationsago, Japan was a pioneer of laity-based,
woman friendly.
religions(Davis 1992; Hardacre 1984; Metraux1996).
peace-and-prosperity
Boston
is DirectoroftheInstitute
on Culture,ReligionandWorldAffairs,
RobertW. Hefner(rhefner@bu.edu)
University.
1032
RobertW. Hefkier
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1033
varietiesof
generations
ago, SoutheastAsia was renownedforthe home-grown
Islam made famousby scholarssuch as Clifford
Geertz(1960, 1965) and Sven
Hizbut
Cederroth(1981, 1996), today,Saudi-inspired
conservatives,
Salafiyyah
and Muslim Brothersmove effortlessly
across the
Tahririnternationalists,
region.However,althoughSoutheastAsia's Islamic resurgenceshows clear
influencesfindtheirmeaning,to borrowa
the universalized
globalinflections,
phrasefromAnnaLowenhauptTsing,notin "abstractprinciplesof knowledge
and power,but ratherin concreteengagements"(2005, 67; cf. Hefner1998;
Howell2008, 219-21).
The moststartling
of easternAsia'sreligiousrevitalizations,
however,is that
takingplace in China. China specialistsdo not have to be remindedthatthis
in lightof the highmodernistsecularism
developmentis especiallysurprising
of Chinese MarxismLeninism,expressedin its fullausterity
duringthe Great
Leap Forwardand CulturalRevolution.Yet today,a generationafterthose
tensofmillionsofChineseare activein Budcalamities,
"superstitions-smashing
in ancestraland templerites;
dhistworship;severalhundredmillionparticipate
ofa
mostcommonly
and between20 millionand 60 millionprofessChristianity,
neo-Pentecostal
variety(see Ashiwaand Wank 2009; Chau 2006; Overmyer
Americancomas some conservative
it
2003). Certainly is too earlyto forecast,
mentatorshave,thatChina will soon have the greatestnumberof Christians
outsideof the West.Whatis clear,however,is thatpopularsocietyin China is
buta bustlingandpluralizedrelinotan end ofhistory
secularization,
undergoing
life.
social
of
gionizationofbroadexpanses
easternAsia's
inthisessaythen,iswhether
The questionunderlying
myremarks
coincihistorical
richesis merelya strange
oflatemodernreligious
embarrassment
dence,or whetherit has some commonsociologicaland moralthreadrunning
is a response
thatAsia'sresurgence
havehypothesized
it. Some analysts
through
ascendantneoliberalism.
ofthestateinthefaceofa globally
retreat
totheostensible
Othersof Tocquevillianpersuasionhave seen the resurgenceas the welcome
state.Still
expressionof a civilsocietyrisingin the face of a long overbearing
as theunintended
theresurgence
haveportrayed
othercommentators
consequence
theoffspring
themselves
ofonce securesecularnationalisms,
ofthedestabilization
in theheydayofWesterncolonialism.
introduced
ofpoliticalsecularisms
accounts
directsour attentionto relevantissues,I
each
of
these
Although
whatdrawsnonelitesto new
suggestthat,forthe purposesof understanding
thesemetanarratives
formsofreligiousobservance,
putrathertoo muchempha"secularist"
of the state,globalcapital,and a putatively
sis on the macro-logics
of
the
microand
and
rather
too
little
on
meso-passions self,family,
modernity
life.As HarriEnglundand JamesLeach have notedwithregard
and everyday
narratives
riskobscurtocertainusagesoftheconceptof"modernity,"
high-flying
passions"(2000, 234) of religiousactors,especially
ing the "specificexistential
Michael
those whom I shall call- adaptinga notionfromthe anthropologist
Peletz (1997) "ordinary"
believers.
1034
RobertW. Hefner
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1035
times,thewayinwhichtheissuewas
(see Roberts1995).A signoftheintellectual
and modernizistas
had
had
Whereas
neo-Weberians
assessed,however, changed.
withhowreligionmightinculcatehabitsoftheheart
longconcernedthemselves
was lessintent
thisnewscholarship
and walletconduciveto capitalist
enterprise,
how religionmightmake capitalistenterpriseworkthanwith
on determining
betweencapitalismand religion,including
full
the
rangeof synergies
exploring
formarketperformance
thosewhose implications
mightbe neutral,corrosive,
or fetishized.
Nowhereperhapshas the new studyof religionand capitalismbeen more
thanwithregardto one ofthe morerecentofthe newAsianreligicontentious
rootslie notinAsia,of
s historical
Pentecostalism
Pentecostal
osities,
Christianity.
In theearlyyearsofthe
course,butin EnglandandAmericasGreatAwakenings.
inermillennial
of
the
twentieth
hope, scriptural
century, evangelicalmessage
AmericanpreachandbaptismbytheHolySpiritwasborrowedbyAfrican
rancy,
with
ecstatic
it
who
ers,
weeping,healing,dancing,and speakingin
spiced up
tongues(Martin1990,28; Maxwell2006; Robbins2004). In the 1960s,thePenA
tecostalstreamunderwentan additionalethicaland epistemicpermutation.
newleadershipdirecteditsmessageawayfromthe fire-and-brimstone
theology
docand moremarket-friendly
ofan earlierera,and preacheda kinder,gentler,
trine,whichwe knowtodayas prosperity
theology(Coleman1995).The message
whatJesusofNazarethhad once saidabouta camel,a
wasthat notwithstanding
needle,and the near-zeroprospectsof a richpersongettingintoheaven- God
healthand wealthawaitall
does not wantyou to staypoor. On the contrary,
who abide by His commandments.
gospel
Althoughnot of Asian origins,localizedvarietiesof the prosperity
who
and
charismatics
Asian
Pentecostals
of
the
new
to
generation
appealed
flockedto the faithfromthe 1980s on. The messagewas popular,forexample,
in Indonesia,
withwhomI interacted
ChineseChristians
amongthemiddle-class
Malaysia,and Singaporein the 1980s and 1990s.Otherstudieshave confirmed
thatthe prosperity
messagecarrieswell acrossclass lines,includingin todays
China(butnotTaiwan),wheremillionsofpoorand a smallernumberofmiddleofthefaith(Bays2003;
classChinesehaveflockedtothiswealth-affirming
variety
Martin2002, 155-57; Vala 2009 ).
and nonhas also made inroadsintonon-Buddhist
Christianity
Prosperity
Muslimareas of SoutheastAsia, includingthe Catholic Philippines.In that
and liberCatholicshave defiedthe churchestablishment
charismatic
country,
ationtheologiansand ralliedto the prosperity
messageof spiritualconfidence
and economicsuccess.HoweverincongruousthisCatholicembraceof a neoProtestant
aspectsof religionand
theologymayappear,the examplehighlights
eastern
Asia.
are
across
that
widespread
capitalism
KatharineWiegele has
In her Investingin Miracles(2005), anthropologist
Catholiof
this
with
a
subtle
account
us
Filipinospeciesofcharismatic
provided
whichfirstappearedon the
cism.Wiegeles focusis the El Shaddaimovement,
1036
RobertW. Hefiier
lower-class
Philippinescene in 1981. El Shaddai'soverwhelmingly
membership
in
the
aftermath
of
the
1986
Power
Revolution
and the
grewsteadily
People
economicsurgeof the Fidel Ramospresidency(Wiegele2005, 3). By the late
1990s,El Shaddaihad about 10 millionfollowers.
El Shaddaiis grudgingly
toleratedbymostofthechurchhierarchy,
Although
and
Catholics
can
manyclergy left-leaning
barelyhidetheirdistasteforthemovement.El Shaddai,thesecriticsclaim,is littlemorethana lightly
Christianized
cult.
The
movement
wealth
in
cargo
promises
magicalexchangefor tithing
donationsto the "treasureboxes"so prominently
displayedat El Shaddais fiveto ten-hourprayerrallies.As withDavid Maxwell's(2007) studyof PentecostalisminZimbabwe,Wiegeledismissesthiscargo-cult
characterization
as simplistic.
Butshealsopointsoutthattheunderlying
of
in
the
which
El Shaddai
logic
tithing
membersengage is indeed modeled on a ratherblatantformof spiritualized
patron-clientism.
Throughdonationsand prayer,one seeks to "obligateGod"
intodelivering
miraculousmaterialfavors.No less significant,
El ShaddaitheolPentecostalsin the global
ogy resemblesthatof manyotherfirst-generation
south,inthatitdeflectsthedesiretoproblematize
"structural,
societal,orhistorical understandings
ofinequality"
(Wiegele2005, 1003;cf.Freston2008,26). The
is
If
clear:
fallen
on hardeconomictimes,don'tfeel sorryfor
message
you've
and don'tget distracteddreamingabout structural
reforms
and social
yourself,
If
in
there
with
God
and
do
miracles
will
justice. youget
yourbest,
happen,whateveryourmarginalized
in society.
circumstance
if
not
Social-psychologically, structurally,
speaking,miraclesdo happen.As
Wiegeleexplains,the El Shaddaibrings"ritualspace intothe home and self."
There's the proximatespirituality
to which I referredearlier.This spiritual
of home and self,Wiegeleadds,allows"ordinary
empowerment
people to heal
and to mediatewithGod"; it "rejectsdetermining
notionsofpovertyand seeks
to retelllife historiesand futuresin narrativesof transformative
miracles"
This
(2005, 171).
tangiblyoptimisticand self-empowering
spiritis captured
in
the
chanted
hundreds
of
thousands
of
vividly
slogan
by
mostlypoor people
at El Shaddai rallies:"I am rich! I am strong!Somethinggood is goingto
happento me!" (Wiegele2005, 173).
From the broaderperspectiveof the easternAsian resurgence,the El
Shaddai storyis not unique, althoughits class profileis more impoverished
than manyothermovements.The past generationhas seen wealth-affirming
and individual-"empowering"
take root across the region.A few
religiosities
RobertWeilerpointedout thatin Taiwan and
yearsago, the anthropologist
China,the religiousscene was rifewithamoralghostcults.Weilerdescribed
these cultsas amoralbecause theirspirituallogic is thatof a self-interested
and freelancing
actormakinga quick-and-easy
bargainwitha gift-giving
ghost.
The spiritualdeal makingrequireslittle,if any,public mindedness,and even
In Weilers words,the interaction
less ethicalself-cultivation.
is premisedon
"individualisminstead of community,utilitarianism
instead of familyor
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1037
amoralmarketinsteadof a clearset of
community
good,and an unpredictable,
sharedmorals"(1994, 162).
of similarly
transactionaIn recentyears,we have also seen a proliferation
lized cultsin Vietnamand the Theravadalandsof SoutheastAsia. As Rachelle
M. Scotts (2009) studyof the DhammakyaTemple outside of Bangkok
to selfremindsus, however,not all of these movementsare as indifferent
and publicethicsas Wellers ghostcultists.The largestand fastest
cultivation
of
growing Thailand's Buddhist temples, the Dhammakyarecruitsfrom
higherup in the social hierarchythan does El Shaddai, among the urban
middleclass ratherthanthe poor. The templeuses modernmass media and
to advertiseits religiousservices.In so doing,it operates"in a
slickmarketing
mannersimilarto Soka Gakkai [in Japan]and Foguan Shan [in Taiwan],as
well as the prosperitygospels of prominentChristianevangelicals,"in the
sense that"theTemplelinkspersonaland communalsuccessto the application
of Buddhisttruthsto ones everydayactivities"(Scott2009, 55). At the same
time,and in a manneranalogousto El Shaddais positionwithregardto thePhilippineCatholicChurch,theDhammakyaleadershiptakescare to makepublic
Tellingly,
pledgesofallegianceto Thailand'sreligiousandpoliticalestablishment.
however, the temple uses these declarations to legitimate less
establishment-authorized
practicesand doctrines.Chief among these is that
laicizesthe meditationtraditionof monasticpractice"
the temple"effectively
(Scott2009, 65), makingexercisesonce reservedformonasticmale virtuosos
availableto laymen and women.
The DhammakyathusdrawsdownthehighidealsofTheravadaBuddhism
citizenshopingfora proactiveandproximate
intothelifeworldsofordinary
pracandkeepinginmindthemiddle-class
ticeofthefaith.Seen fromthisperspective,
thatthetemplealso offers
itis notat all surprising
profileofitscoreconstituency,
entrance
for
how
"to
on
exams,transform
wayward
college
prepare
guidance
and bringfamiliestogether"(Scott
teens,cultivateconfidencein professionals,
reli2009,55). The logicofthisand manyothervarietiesofso-calledprosperity
butconfidenceand moralsecurity
gion,then,is notmerelymaterialwell-being,
in thepursuitof nearat handconcerns.
inwhichsomemightexpectnotto see such
Ifthereis one religioustradition
a market-and society-accommodating
mien,it mightwell be SoutheastAsian
Islam. It is notthatIslam is opposed to wealthmakingor class inequalities.As
Muslimreformists
fromthe MiddleEast to SoutheastAsiahaveloudlydeclared
the ProphetMuhammadand hisfirstwifewere
forthebetterpartofa century,
Islamis arguablythemostcomall
the
world
and
of
merchants,
major
religions,
All thisis
at leastas seen fromthe perspectiveof itsscriptures.
mercefriendly,
trueenough,but one wouldhastento add thatMuslimshave not alwaysbeen
fortwobasic reasons.
enamoredofmoderncapitalism,
in the
Western
liberalimaginariesto the contrary,
First,notwithstanding
Muslimworld,moderncapitalismwas not the felicitous
productof individuals
1038
RobertW. Heftier
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1039
in additionto the
barrennessof NorthAtlanticcapitalism.Equally striking,
in
meditation
Burma, Thailand, and Cambodia,
consumer-friendly
groups
thereare good numbersof Buddhistmonksand lay personswho, ratherthan
middle-classwealthmaking,call fora sober and environmentally
legitimating
religiousethics(see Taylor1997).
friendly
incontemporary
easternAsia,then,is not
The storyofreligionandcapitalism
neoliberalizedor even made marketfriendly.
thatof mass religioneverywhere
Like the nun-ledCompassionRelief movementstudiedby C. JuliaHuang
setup byan anticon(2009) in Taiwan,and the SantiAsokBuddhistcommunity
sumeristmonkin Thailand(Scott2007, 40), some of the new religiousmovements dedicate themselvesto the poor and the marginalas much as the
middleclassand mobile.
seems clear.The most
Nonetheless,forthe moment,the verdictof history
successfulof the new religiousstreamshave recruiteda massfollowing
byproconsumerism,
messageon markets,
motinga moreupbeatand accommodating
and wealth.The logic of theiraccommodationsreflectsless a knowledgeor
thana concernto providetheiradepts
of neoliberalabstractions,
endorsement
withwhichto negotiatethe maze of
withthe confidenceand morallegitimacy
the marketplaceand urban society.In the next sectionof this essay,I will
thatappliesto religiousresponsesto capitsuggestthatthelogicoftheproximate
alismalso appliesto the otherelephantin the easternAsianreligiousroom:the
state.
modern,omnipretentious
developmentalist
States and the New Religiosity
behemoth?Could it be thatsome tectonic
What,then,of the nation-state
betweenstateand societyis the real keyto the new
shiftin the relationship
Let me tryto addressthisquestionfirstby lookingback on
Asianreligiosity?
covered.
groundalready
and market
Ghostcultists,
Buddhists,
Christians,
wealth-affirming
prosperity
Muslimsall tend,relatively
speaking,to steerclear of anygrandtheoryof the
of hierarchy
and exclusionin society.Each does so in a
stateor the structures
mannerthatreflectsthe proximateconcerns,capacities,and class standingof
ofthereligioustraand epistemicconstraints
itsbelievers,as wellas thedoctrinal
ditionitself.The lackof interestin abstractpoliticalschemesmayat timesalso
as withChinas healingcults,
of the ritualcommunity,
reflectthe formlessness
likea
in whicha healerworkswithindividualclientsand thuswithoutanything
El
Shaddai
or
At
as
with
the
other
times,
assembly.
Philippines'
congregational
the apoliticism
is compoundedby the sense thatactiThailand'sDhammakya,
vismmightjeopardizetheleaderships politicaland economicinterests.
some
a generaldisinclination
towardgrandpoliticaltheory,
Notwithstanding
to
heed
to
and
the
new
their
adherents
politics public
religions
enjoin
pay
among
1040
RobertW. Heftier
ethics.As CharlesKeyes(1987) and Donald Swearer(1995) have shown,Theravada Buddhismhas longhad an ideal of thejust kingupholdingthe dhamma
in Buddhist
and democracyreformists
conservatives
law. Both establishment
SoutheastAsia invokethatideal to legitimateopposingpoliticalvisions.There
is a similarpatternto Islam in SoutheastAsia. There,both militantIslamists
and Muslimdemocratscite Islam'spublicethicalprincipleto "commandright
and forbidwrong"(Cook 2000), but theydo so in supportof different
political
aims(Hefner2005; Wilson2008). Aboveand beyondthisvariationin politicalhowever,it is striking
mindedness,
that,iftheyturnto politicsat all, the more
successfulreligiouscurrentsdo so by bringing
theirreligiousmessageclose to
the concernsand lifeworldsof ordinary
believers.The politicstheypursueis
one that moves throughsubjectiveand proximatedisciplines,ratherthan
frontal
assaultson a distantstateor religiousestablishment.
This pointis nicelyillustrated
withregardto contemporary
Burma'senormous lay meditationmovement.As JulianeSchoberhas shownin a seriesof
Burmais tornbetweentworival
studies,Buddhismin contemporary
important
animated
different
ethicalvisions.The firstis that
organizations
by profoundly
so lavishlysupportedby the regime-backedState Peace and Development
Council(SPDC), thepresent-day
extensionofthe StateLaw and OrderRestorationCouncilthathas ruthlessly
ruledBurmasince 1988. As Schoberexplains,
the SPDC uses "large-scaleritualsto legitimatea politicalhierarchyof the
state"(2005, 114). ThistatistBuddhismis, of course,thoroughly
political,but
itspoliticsis premisedon a "scripturalist,
and centraotherworldly,
nonpolitical,
lizedsangha"(Schober2005, 117).Thisofficial
Buddhismalsosendsmissionaries
to the nation'stribalmargins,
as an adjunctto the regimes repressiveefforts
at
ethnicand nationalintegration.
Schoberisquicktopointout,however,
thatthereisanother
ofBuddhism
variety
in Burma.It is basednoton theregimes religious
on
the
but
designs,
popularand
As withthelong-suppressed
Nobel Peace
generalizedpracticeof laymeditation.
PrizewinnerAungSan Suu Kyi,someinthemeditation
movement
blenda socially
engagedBuddhismwithWesternpost-Enlightenment
devisingBuddhist
thought,
for
and
human
grounds democracy
rights(Schober2005, 127). As Schoberand
the anthropologist
the largestof the lay
IngridJordthavebothshown,however,
meditation
movements
also engagein a proximate
spiritual
politics:theyseek to
to a lay publicthat,in an earliertime,would have
open vipassanmeditation
The first
been barredfromthiselevatedspiritual
discipline.
principleofthisrelithen,is notstatecapture,butthedesireto open a ritualformonce
giouspolitics,
believers.No less important,
reservedformonasticvirtuososto ordinary
Jordt
featureof thisNew Laityis thatwomen
tellsus that"[t]hemostdistinguishing
in meditation"
are byfarthe mainparticipants
(2007, 158; forThailand,cf.Scott
2009; forTaiwan,see Huang2009; Madsen2007,21-41; Weiler1999,33-^36).
Like Schober,Jordtgoes on to pointout thatthevipassanmovementdoes
Wherethe state
notsteerentirely
clearofhigher-level
politicalpreoccupations.
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1041
1042
RobertW. Heftier
suchgrandprohowever,
newlypious,notleastofall thepoorand marginalized,
More
to
the
all
such
remain
remote
and
dangerous.
point,
politicalprojects
jects
whentheydo not firstpass throughthe pietistdisciare seen as compromised
(cf.Gade 2004; Smith-Hefner
2007).
plinesof ethicalself-fashioning
Conclusion
let me returnto thequestionwithwhichI beganthis
Bywayofa conclusion,
as
to
what
these
essay,
examplesof religiousresurgence
sayaboutpolitics,
public
incontemporary
East and Southeast
Asia.For thoseofTocqueethics,andreligion
villian
whohavelonghopedthatnewreligious
associations
nurture
persuasion
might
habitsofthedemocratic
seem disappointing.
heart,theanswer,I fear,mayat first
Unlesswe restrict
ourgaze to religious
associations
thatalreadysubscribe
to liberal
ideals- a standard
thatwouldexcludemanyreligiousassociations
in theWest(cf.
Edwardsand Foley2001; Hefner1998,2001)- it is clearthatthepoliticalvalues
ofthenewreligious
currents
arevaried.Someareexplicitly
committed
todemocratic
ideals.A greaternumberpopularizehabitsofpietyand self-cultivation
fromwhich
believers
were
once
excluded.
other
are
either
indifferHowever,
ordinary
groupings
enttodemocratic
inIndonesiawhomI
or,as withtheLaskarJihadmilitants
projects,
havestudied(Hefner2003,2005; cf.Hasan 2006),directly
opposed.Some groups
use the socialand culturalcapitalgeneratedin religiousassociationfornotably
"uncivil"
habitsoftheheart(cf.Edwardsand Foley2001; Keane 1996,19).
Asia'snew religiosity
then,thanthe
maybe less a matterof democratization,
and proximatization
of once restricted
popularization
spiritual
disciplines.
Long a
in
a
doldrums
even
the
Catholic
Church
has
had to
sea,
lumbering
ship
Filipino
resonate
withtheneedsanddesiresofordingivegroundtothedemandthatreligion
believers.
there
are
democratic
ary
Certainly,
qualitiestothesechanges.Ifbydemocratization
we meantheopeningofheretofore
restricted
spherestobroadenedpublic
then
democratization
is
indeed
participation, religious
takingplace. However,as a
formof institutional
is a farmoreprocedural,
rulepractice,moderndemocracy
and
than
such
a
casual
extension
of
the
term
would
allow
bound,
objectified
entity
at workin easternAsias religious
(cf. Stepan2001). Whatis moreimmediately
fieldsis the populardemandforaccess to heretofore
restricted
practicesof the
as wellas theirapplication
to everyday
concernsbyordinary
believers.
faith,
If notthe religiousexpression
of a tectonicdemocraticshift,
then,justwhat
to thefore?The examplesI havediscussedin
broughtthenewAsianreligiosities
thisessayoffertwobroadanswersto thisquestion.First,it seemsthatmanyin
easternAsianeverentirely
lostthehabitofaddressing
questionsofvalue,security,
withtransnatural
real"bywayofanidealizedengagement
andthe"really
beingsand/
whatsecularnationalist
or statesofbeing.Notwithstanding
hegemonsmayhave
in official
influence
thecontinuing
oncetoldthemto believe,and notwithstanding
ofprivate
belief(Asad1993;Ashiwa
viewsofreligion
as a matter
circlesof''Western"
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1043
andWank2009;VanderVeer2001),a goodnumberofordinary
citizenscontinueto
feelthatone buildsa moresecurefoundation
forprivateand publiclifethrough
to thetransnatural
ethicalized
relations
(cf.Seligmanet al. 2008).
the
what
has
Second,
brought resurgenceto theforehas also to do withthe
A simunintendedeffectsofsuccessfulstatebuildingand marketdevelopment.
1950s
the
and
creative
from
the
to
destructive
1970s,the
torrent,
ultaneously
stateand capitalsweptawaymostof the delicatesociomorallatticesthrough
whichpeople gave securityand ethicalorderto theirlives.For some citizens,
and notjust the well heeled or progressive
minded,these changesopened up
new horizonsof mobilityand opportunity,
includingfor women. But for
the
even
some
others,
among
sociallyprivileged,the new landscapewas still
Whereasbefore
blightedby largeexpansesof social and ethicalformlessness.
therewere villagesand marketsregulatedby familyand community
codes,
there is today the sometimesdesultorylandscape of the urban apartment
scrambletowardeduand thenever-ending
ofnon-kin,
block,theneighborhood
and growingold on one s own.
cation,employment,
Whentheyfirstappealedto the massesto join themon the goldenroadto
easternAsia's elites were confidentthattheyhad comprehensive
modernity,
guidesforthe brave new worldintowhichtheyinvitedtheirfellowcitizens.
resThe leadershipeventually
discovered,however,thatit had no enduringly
and intimatelandscapesof
onantethicalplan, not least forthe fast-changing
urbanlife.The exampleremindsus thatin easternAsia, as in much of the
world,dominationin the marketand state does not guaranteehegemonyin
of ordinary
thelifeworldsand moralimaginaries
people.
thatAsia'snewreligious
It is intotheseunstablemicro-and meso-landscapes
The factthatin Beijingand Shanghaitoday,thereare sophisareflowing.
currents
whospeak
someofthemCommunist
ticatedsecularintellectuals,
Partymembers,
ethical
other
or
some
a
"cultural
need
for
of
the
middle-range
Christianity"
favorably
of the perceivedvoid. The macro-structural
code, speaksto the pervasiveness
forproxofthestateandcapitalhaveonlydeepenedthepopularthirst
achievements
In thissense,easternAsia's
imatemoralguidesandinexclusive
spiritual
disciplines.
ofthe late modern
a
notas mystification
is bestunderstood
religiousresurgence
insecurities
butas a creativeand nonsecularresponseto theexistential
condition,
not
withwhich,
and participatory
manyWestern
coincidentally,
opportunities
modernshavealsolonggrappled(cf.McLeod 2007).
List of References
Asad,Talal. 1993. Genealogiesof Religion:Disciplineand Reasonsof Powerin ChrisPress.
tianityand Islam. Baltimore:JohnsHopkinsUniversity
Ashiwa,Yoshiko,and David L. Wank,eds. 2009. MakingReligion,MakingtheState:The
Calif: StanfordUniversity
Press.
PoliticsofReligionin ModernChina. Stanford,
1044
RobertW. Hefner
Glenme111.:
FreePress.
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1045
1046
RobertW. Heftier
Asia
ReligiousResurgencein Contemporary
1047