Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report on
Senior High
School
Students
Forum
MANOLITA C. SALAGUNTING
SHS COORDINATOR
he Senior High School students forum was conducted to all grade 10 students
of Carmen NHS on September 9, 2015. It was organized by Mr. Adel R.
Cambangay, Jr. with the active support of Mrs. Celia A. Castillo, the Schools
Guidance Counselor, Mrs. Manolita C. Salagunting, the SHS Coordinator and all the
dynamic advisers of Grade 10 level. The forum was graced with the highly proficient
speaker of the k-12-SHS Program, Mrs. Cely Labadan, the assistant to the Principal.
T
T
he forum was divided into three parts; the first part was the talk proper as
delivered by the assistant to the principal, then the open forum part where
students were free to express themselves and ask questions and the final part
was the answering of the K to 12 Survey Questionnaires for Students. The
survey will be used to assess in considering the SHS Tracks and Strands offerings of
the school.
he Grade 10 students were divided into 2 sessions of 4 sections per session.
The first group started at 8:00am to 10:00am with Grades 10 Del Rosario,
Dingel, Flores and Yldefonso. The second group from 10:am to 12:00nn
with Grades 10 San Juan, Zara, Alcala and Yldefonso. Every session started
with a prayer, the singing of National Anthem, a welcome message and introduction
of the speaker by the Grade 10 Level Chairman, Mr. Adel R. Cambangay,Jr.
t was observed that during the talk, the students listened interestingly and
responded actively to the relaxed and friendly atmosphere set by the speaker.
There were questions asked by the students during the open forum in which the
speaker was able to answer satisfactorily and students were clarified of the cobwebs
that boggle their minds concerning their future in the Senior High School.
SURVEY RESULTS
Table 1
Summary of Attendance
No. of Attendees
39
30
26
32
33
35
26
0
221
Section
San Juan
Zara
Del Rosario
Dingel
Flores
Acala
Yldefonso
OHSP
Total
LIS Enrolment
45
38
42
43
38
41
44
15
306
Table 1 shows the number of students attended the forum per section and the
expected number of attendees as shown in the LIS enrolment column. It is noted that
there were no students from the OHSP-Open High School Program which is an ADMAlternative Delivery Mode since the forum was conducted on a weekday when these
students were on their respective jobs.
Figure 1
GRADE 10 RESPONSES
YES
NO
10%
90%
Figure1 shows the responses of the students in the question whether they are
going to college or not. Almost all of the students are eager to go to college and those
who are not going to college have varied reasons like; parents could not afford to
send them to college, lack of interest in pursuing their studies and they wanted to
work after graduation to help support the financial needs of the family.
Figure 2
PUBLIC HIGH
SCHOOL
PRIVATE HIGH
SCHOOL
98%
Figure 3
YOU
FATHER
M OTHER
PARENTS
Figure 3 shows the responses of the grade 10 students when asked who will
decide which track they are going to pursue in Senior High School. The parents, both
the mother and the father has the decision over the mother alone, nor the father alone
nor the students themselves. Other choices being the teacher and the guardian is not a
consideration of the decision making in choosing the track which may affect the
future of the students.
Figure 4
TVL
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Figure 4 tells us that most of the parents are considering the Academic track
over the TVL-Technical Vocational Livelihood track for their children which means
their children will enroll in a college course after the 2-year Senior High School.
Figure 5
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
STEM
HUMMS
ABM
GAS
HE
AF
IA
Though parents have chosen the academic track for their children,
however, the results as shown in Figure 5 signify that they are considering the
GAS-General Academic strand.
Figure 6
TVL
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Students responses of their own choice of track to take up in the Senior High
School slightly differ from the choice of their parents as shown in Figure 6 on the
previous page. However, the academic track is still the main choice of more than
half of the students who responded.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
STEM
HUMMS
ABM
GAS
HE
AF
Figure 7
IA
Figure 7 shows the students choice of strand to take up in the Senior High
School. GAS-General Academic Strand still the choice of most of the students like
the parents but there is still minimal difference in number.
Figure 8
29%
1%
1%
11%
58%
Interest
Employment
Opportunities
Life Work Values
Financial
Aptitude
Figure 8 shows the factors that may affect the choice of track and strand of
the students. More than half of the student who responded denotes the importance
of employment opportunities in the consideration of choosing the best track and
strand for them, apparently followed with significant difference by financial and
interest factors respectively. Life work values and aptitude are not considered.
he survey questionnaires for the Grade 10 students who will be the first
batch of the Senior High School implementation of the K-12 program of the
Department of Education verified the pulse of the students as well as the
parents how prepared they are and how they will go through the process of
choosing the career path for their children.
track and strand. It is evident in the result that GAS-General Academic Strand
came out as the choice of most parents and students which means they are still not
so sure and feel safe in the GAS choice because they understand that they can still
proceed to a course in college whenever they realize the course fitted for them.
Parents as well as students make some distance to choose TVL-Technical
Vocational and Livelihood track in the fear that they might want to proceed to
college and become professional someday but they cant push it through because
they are confined to their choice which is work after Senior High School.
O
I
APPENDICES
Appendix A
Appendix B
List of Students in the Academic Strand and the GAS-General Academic Strand
STEM
HUMMS
ABM
GAS
CASINILLO, RICHELLE
EGAGAMAO, CHARLENE
ABDULLAH, OLILY
BARBIETO, MARIEL
BAUTISTA, JERELIEN
CAREIT, IANE
BORRES, CHRIS JOY
ALIMA, MARYJEL
ALMINE, MYKYLLA
ABRAGAN, ERIKA
HAMILI
ABUZO, LORLYN
ACEBES, RONA
ALBARACIN, JULIUS JR
ALCANTARA, ALEXIS
ALVAREZ, ANGELITO
CANONO, RECHEL
JELL
CAIPANG, RHEA MAYE
GATCHALIAN, JENNY
GULTIANO, JESSA
MAE
CALIT, RIZZEL
GANINAY, LOVELY
ROSE
CALLAO, QUENNIE FE
HADJISALIC, NORHANIE
MADRID, JUNALIE
MAGAS, KYLE
HYACINTH
MAGDAYO, SARAH
MAE
REYES, ARCHIE
RODRIGUEZ, JUN
GERALD
ROSAOT, MARK
LESTER
BAGUNA, JOEJIE
ELESTERIO, MAE VENN
LABITAD, JOSHUA A
LICONG, CRISTY LOU
SARIP, ASLEA
SAVARIA, ALEXANDER
TAYLARAN, KIMBERLY
10
MAE
MANUEL, GERALDINE S
MAPANAO, JENNEFER
MAPANDI, NORHAINA
MARBA, NIA VERGARA
MARIANO, DULCE AMOR
MENDEZ, LEA JANE
MENDEZ, LEAH
MIRADOR, CRISSA MAE
MONSANTO, PRINCESS
INEE
MUGOT, JENNY ROSE
NAGALES, MARIA
ISABELA
NAMATA, ANNALYN
NAMBATAC, NOVA
NARITO, DEBBIE ROSE
OBOD, MARIEL AMARGA
OLAGUER, KRISTINE
JANE
OMPOC, JEANIE BEB
ONYOT, JACKLYN
ONYOT, JERLYN GOLES
OPOG, SHERRY MAE
OPONE, JESSALYN
ORDINAN, MICHELLE
ORONG, KRISTAL
OTBO, MA TERESA
Appendix C
11
Appendix D
PICTORIALS
12
DATA PROCESSING
13
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Survey Results
14
Appendices
7
Appendix A K-12 Survey Questionnaire
for Students
Appendix D Pictorials
Appendix E
ATTENDANCE SHEETS
15