Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3, MAY 2012
323
I. I NTRODUCTION
and
M
pij = 1 j.
(1)
i=1
324
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 3, MAY 2012
(2)
ZARE et al.: DIRECTLY MEASURING MATERIAL PROPORTIONS USING HYPERSPECTRAL COMPRESSIVE SENSING
(3)
325
M N
1
|
pij pij |.
M N i=1 j=1
(6)
As
.
An
(7)
(8)
(9)
Therefore, using A as the sensing matrix yields the proportions directly from the sensor. This is a remarkable and
potentially extremely useful result.
326
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, VOL. 9, NO. 3, MAY 2012
Fig. 1. Average error of estimated proportion values. The average error for
the uncompressed noisy data with S = I is represented by the dotted line.
The results are found using an S matrix composed of normally distributed
sampled values. Error bars show one standard deviation across ten random
sensing matrices. (a) 1% noise and mean signal-to-noise of 38 dB. (b) 2%
noise and mean signal-to-noise of 32 dB. (c) 5% noise and mean signal-to-noise
of 24 dB.
(10)
ZARE et al.: DIRECTLY MEASURING MATERIAL PROPORTIONS USING HYPERSPECTRAL COMPRESSIVE SENSING
327
Fig. 2. Average errors of estimated endmembers. The results are found using
an S matrix composed of normally distributed sampled values. Error bars
show one standard deviation across ten random sensing matrices. (a) 1% noise
and mean signal-to-noise of 38 dB. (b) 2% noise and mean signal-to-noise of
32 dB. (c) 5% noise and mean signal-to-noise of 24 dB.