Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Panel
Chair
Prof. Guo Huadong
Center for Earth Observation and Digital
Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Panelist
Dr. Salvano Briceno, United Nations
Dr. Frederick Campbell, Fred Campbell
Consulting, Canada
Mr. K. Harald Drager, President, The International Emergency Management Society, Norway
Staff
Ms. Ling Thompson, British Royal Society
Ms. Liu Jie, Center for Earth Observation and
Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences
ii
Foreword
The catastrophic tsunami in the Indian Ocean
on December 26, 2004 inflicted tremendous
l o ss e s i n human lives and prop er t ies
upon the coastal countries. As part of the
response to the major natural disasters,
the InterAcademy Panel on International
Issues (IAP) launched the Natural Disaster
Mitigation Initiative in early 2005 in order
to alleviate the impact of natural disasters
through scientific and technological means,
review the applications of science and
technology in natural disaster relief, and
set the course for future endeavor for the
scientific and technological community.
The Project led by the Chinese Academy of
Sciences (CAS), was joined by academies
of Bangladesh, Cuba, Japan, the Netherlands,
Sweden, and the United States, followed later by
their counterparts in Australia, Canada, India,
and Nigeria, etc. Based on this, the Natural
Disaster Mitigation Study Panel of IAP was
formed in April, 2005.
iii
iv
Preface
The great earthquake that occurred in the
Indian Ocean on December 26, 2004 caused
an unprecedented large tsunami, which
successively struck more than ten coastal
countries and resulted in about 300,000
deaths and severe economic losses. The
whole world was shocked by the tsunami and
governments and scientific community all
over the world were forced to reflect on the
issue: how could mankind effectively utilize
science and technology to cope with similar
serious natural disasters? Many international
efforts have been made to explore the
serious problem. The InterAcademy Panel
on International Issues (IAP) took prompt
action. The IAP co-chairs, Prof. Yves Qur
and Prof. Chen Zhu, issued a written proposal
appealing for the joint actions of the IAP
community to deal with tsunami and other
serious natural disasters, which won warm
support from IAP member academies.
The IAP approved an initiative entitled
Global Natural Hazards and Disaster
Reduction at its executive committee meeting
held in Stockholm in February, 2005. The
study panel, in which the scientists came
from a few national academies, finished the
work (Phase I) in September 2005. At the
IAP EC meeting held in Shanghai in October
2005, the title was changed to Natural
Disaster Mitigation. Thus IAP approved the
initiation of the Phase II research work and
encouraged the participation of more national
academies.
Since 2006, the study panel has held series of
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
vii
viii
Acknowledgements
The Study Panel thanks the InterAcademy
Panel on International Issues, especially IAP
co-chairs Prof. Chen Zhu and Prof. Howard
Alper, former IAP co-chair Prof. Yves
Qur, and the IAP Executive Committee,
for recognizing the urgency of the topic and
providing the opportunity to undertake this
important study.
The Study Panel acknowledges the many
individuals and organizations who have
shared information and provided suggestions
that have helped shape the report.
The Study Panel would like to express sincere
gratitude to the Science Academies that
responded to the questionnaire circulated
by the Study Panel: Albanian Academy of
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(CAS), Academia Sinica, National Academy
of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences
( A N C E F N ) of A r g e nt i n a , Au s t r a l i a n
Academy of Science, Cuban Academy of
Sciences, The Academy of Athens, Indian
National Science Academy (INSA), Science
Council of Japan (SCJ), Academy of Sciences
Malaysia, Academy Council of the Royal
Society of New Zealand, Pakistan Academy
of Sciences (PAS), Royal Swedish Academy
of Sciences (RSAS), as well as the scientific
organizations from Jamaica. Their input
and suggestions are woven throughout the
report. The working group wishes to thank
ICSU (International Council for Science)
and AASA (Association of Academies of
Sciences in Asia) for their support and
cooperation.
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Executive Summary
Background
The devastating Indian Ocean tsunami of
December 2004 highlighted the lack of
preparedness and lack of data-sharing among
the affected countries. Nearly a quarter of a
million people lost their lives, and over 1.6
million were displaced from their homes.
In the aftermath of this shocking event, IAP
members decided to activate the Academies
and their scientists in efforts to increase
international cooperation in research, datasharing and application of modern technology
for disaster mitigation.
As proposed by the Chinese Academy of
Sciences (CAS), agreed upon and approved
by the IAP Executive Committee Meeting in
February, 2005, the IAP initiative on Natural
Disaster Mitigation was launched as an IAP
response to the Indian Ocean tsunami and more
generally to natural disaster mitigation. CAS
was to act as the lead Academy for the initiative
and member academies from Bangladesh,
Cuba, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden, U.S., and
Indonesia joined the initiative.
The six member academies quickly nominated
their experts to join the working group. Later
on, experts from Canada, Australia, Norway,
Nigeria and UN assisted in the initiative.
Between 2005 and 2008, a number of workshops were held, which formed task groups to
work on establishing and sharing natural
disaster databases, and ensuring their manageNatural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Scientific Understanding of
Natural Disasters
Natural hazards resulting from geophysical
and hydrometeorological events are uncontrollable forces that impact the environment
in which we live. Earthquakes and volcanic
eruptions can alter the earths topography,
while flooding and drought have a great
impact on life forms. Often, hazards become
disasters that cause human and economic
losses, and the magnitude of these losses is
increasing. Complex infrastructure, population
growth and widespread poverty are some of
the reasons, but human activities such as land
use practices exacerbate the effects.
This is evident both in developing and developed
countries. Further, there is now convincing
evidence that climate change is contributing
to an increasing frequency and intensity of
some types of events.
However, as we prepare to meet these changing hydrometeorological conditions, we must
use science and technology to explore the
potentially positive aspects of a changing
climate.
Lack of scientific and technological tools or
experience cannot explain why so many of
the hazards become disasters. Knowledge,
experience and tools exist, but there is
a problem of access to, and sharing of,
information and data, and a need for science
to be incorporated into social and political
decision-making. To reduce risks and
vulnerability, to mitigate the effects of natural
disasters, and to improve rescue operations,
xii
International Activities in
Natural Disaster Mitigation
As natural disasters have become major
threats to human life and the world economy,
governments and international organizations
are cooperating to promote global and
regional risk management, and to improve the
capability to mitigate the effects of disasters.
Early international disaster reduction activities
can be traced back to the International Decade
for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR, 19901999). It raised awareness of the significance of
natural disaster reduction. In 1994, the First
World Conference on Disaster Reduction
was held in Yokohama, Japan, establishing
the guiding principles for the Decade for
Natural Disaster Reduction. In December,
1999, the UN General Assembly adopted the
International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
(ISDR) to implement follow-up action for the
achievements of the decade, and to promote
the continuing development of disaster
reduction around the world. Then, in 2005,
the Second World Conference on Disaster
Reduction was held in Hyogo Prefecture,
Japan, and the Action 2005-2015: Building
the Resilience of Nations and Communities
to Disasters (Hyogo Framework for Action,
HFA), was adopted by the Conference, which
has become the international blueprint for
disaster reduction. In December, 2006, the
United Nations General Assembly agreed
to establish the United Nations Platform
for Space-based Information for Disaster
Management and Emergency ResponseUNSPIDER as a new United Nations
programme.
This is a gateway to space-based information
for disaster management support, serving
as a bridge to connect disaster management
and space communities, and by being a faciliNatural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Earthquake Disasters
An earthquake is a sudden movement of
the Earths lithosphere (its crust and upper
mantle), which is caused by the release of
built-up stresses within rocks along geological
faults, or by the movement of magma in
volcanic areas. Smaller earthquakes occur
frequently, but annually only as many as 18-20
reach a magnitude above Ms 7. Approximately
40 disastrous earthquakes have occurred since
xiii
xvi
Recommendations
This report has the specific purpose of
providing a scientific and practical guide
to Academies of Sciences, with examples of
good practice of mitigation measures and
technique. The intention is not to propose a
xvii
munication technology.
xix
xx
Contents
Study Panel i
Foreword iii
Preface v
Acknowledgements ix
Executive Summary xi
1 Global Natural Disasters 1
2 International Disaster Reduction Activities 13
3 Earthquake Disasters 23
4 Tropical Cyclones and Storm Surges 58
5 Flood and Drought Induced Disasters 73
6 Earth Observation for Natural Disaster Mitigation 86
7 Disaster Mitigation Strategies and Recommendations 112
Annex 1 Global Natural Disaster and Disaster Reduction Survey 117
Annex 2 Analyses on the Responses of the Questionnaire about
Natural Disaster Mitigation 120
Annex 3 Glossary 127
Annex 4 Wenchuan Earthquake Disaster Mitigation 130
References 143
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
xxi
xxii
1.1 Introduction
mitigation research.
Low Income
2 237 777 288 (55.58%)
Lower Middle
Income
Upper Middle
Income
High Income
500
Drought
Earthquake
Epidemio
Flood
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
Million people
Slide
Volcano
Wind storm
Others
Figure 1.1 World overview from 1975-2000 of number of people affected categorized by income class
and disaster type
200
Hydrometeorogical
Flood
150
d
Win
te
rela
Dr
ou
g
ht
&
50
m
Stor
disaste
rs
100
Slide
s
197
0
197
1
197
2
197
3
197
4
197
5
197
6
197
7
197
8
197
9
198
0
198
1
198
2
198
3
198
4
198
5
198
6
198
7
198
8
198
9
199
0
199
1
199
2
199
3
199
4
199
5
199
6
199
7
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
0
Year
Figure 1.3 Number of natural disasters by type (1970-2005) (from ISDR Disaster Statistics)
90
80
Annual losses
$1bn
total economic losses
70
insured losses
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1950
1960
13
Source: Munich Re, 2004
16
1970
1980
29
Number of events
44
1990
72
1998
2003
natural catastrophes:
Wind and Storm, e.g. tsunami, typhoon
and storm surge;
Earthquake;
Flood, and
Others, e.g. volcano, geo-disaster, biodisaster, and fire, etc. See Figure 1.5.
50 %
Frequency
45%
Death Toll
Economic Loss
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Storm
Earthquake
Flood
Others
Figure 1.5 Ratio for frequency, death toll and economic loss 1950-1999
Conclusions:
The most frequent occurrence of disasters
are wind & storm (38%), earthquake (29%)
and flood (27%);
Disasters with the biggest death toll are
earthquake (47%), wind & storm (45%),
and flood (7%);
Disasters with the biggest economic losses
are earthquake (35%), flood (30%), and
wind & storm (28%).
To conclude, storms, earthquakes, and floods
1.3.1 Harmfulness
Natural disasters have caused serious harm,
resulting in huge social, economic, and
environmental losses, and have affected
peoples livelihood and development. This is
considered to be the most common feature of
natural disasters.
1.3.2 Unexpectedness
A natural disaster often occurs suddenly and
without obvious warning signs. As people
are unaware of the event until it hits them,
casualties and losses tend to be more severe
than when there is time to take evasive action.
8
12
International Disaster
Reduction Activities
2.1 Introduction
Early international disaster reduction activities
can be traced back to the International Decade
for Natural Disaster Reduction 1990-1999, or
IDNDR. It raised international awareness of
the significance of natural disaster reduction.
At the mid-point of the IDNDR, in 1994, the
First World Conference on Disaster Reduction
held in Yokohama, Japan, was able to review
the achievements of IDNDR up to that point,
and to establish guiding principles for the rest
of the Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction.
In December 1999, at the conclusion of the
Decade, the United Nations General Assembly
adopted the International Strategy for Disaster
Reduction (ISDR) to implement follow-up
action for the achievements of the Decade
and to promote the continuing development
of disaster reduction around the world.
Then, in 2005, the 2nd World Conference on
Disaster Reduction held in Hyogo Prefecture,
Japan, and the Action 2005-2015: Building
the Resilience of Nations and Communities to
Disasters (Hyogo Framework for Action, HFA)
adopted by the Conference has become the
international blueprint for disaster reduction.
With the recent occurrence of catastrophes
such as the Indian Ocean tsunami, the
Pakistan earthquake, and Hurricane Katrina,
governments have enhanced their commitment
to disaster mitigation and relief. The voices
calling for global cooperation to reduce the
14
Theme
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
Water: too much ... too little ... the main cause of natural disasters
1998
1999
Prevention pays
2000
Disaster prevention, education and youth, with special focus on forest fires
2001
2002
2003
2004
Learning
2005
2006
2007
2008
practice.
On November 24, 1999, the 54th United
Nat ions G enera l Ass embly adopte d a
resolution to develop IDNDR to ISDR. At
the start of ISDR, the Inter-Agency Task
Force for Disaster Reduction (IATF/DR) and
Inter-Agency Secretariat of the International
Strateg y for Disaster Reduction (UN/
ISDR) were established as first steps towards
implementing a disaster reduction strategy.
The objectives of ISDR are:
To improve the resilience of human society to
17
2.7 Achievements,
Challenges and Future
Development
After many years of international disaster
reduction activities worldwide, international
societies have achieved valuable achievements
listed as follows:
UN Agencies, International and Regional
Organizations and Countries have built
up and perfected the disaster reduction
mechanism and the construction of agencies
with provisions of disaster reduction;
The cooperation in disaster reduction has
been conducted at international, regional
and national levels, strengthening research
on the development of disaster reduction;
For disaster reduction activities, frameworks were generated and executed in
order to prevent or reduce the possible
damage caused by disasters, and
Science and technology, especially spatial
technolog y will play an increasingly
important role in international disaster
mitigation.
At the same time, international disaster
reduction activities are faced with great
challenges, including the following:
22
Earthquake Disasters
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Earthquakes and Their
Effects
1. Earthquake and Disasters
Earthquakes result from interior movements
in earths rigid crust or lithosphere. They
have long affected and changed the earths
internal structure and surface configuration,
and also caused serious injury to living
creatures, especially to human society. Large
earthquakes have caused displacement of
mountains and rivers, caused drastic changes
to the living environment, prompted largescale human migration, and even provoked
war and dynastic replacement.
Many ancient civilizations have kept records
of earthquakes, and over thousands of years,
important understanding of earthquake
monitoring, epicenter localization and
earthquake disaster prevention have been
cumulatively achieved. In 46 AD, the
6.5-magnitude earthquake in Nanyang urban
district, Henan Province of China, caused
approximately 10,000 deaths. Subsequently,
several earthquakes occurred near Luoyang,
the ancient capital of China. The urgent need
for forecasting and quick determination of
the epicenter gave birth to the seismograph
invented by Zhang Heng (79-139 AD), a
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Epicenter
Magnitude
Death Toll
Serious Injury
Occurrence (year)
(place name)
(Ms)
(person)
(person)
1902
Atush, China
8.25
5650
4350
Afghanistan
8.6
20000
8.3
Above 3000
1905
1906
USA
1906
Manasi, China
8.0
300
1907
Uzbekistan
7.8
12000
1908
Italy
7.5
123000
1915
Italy
7.0
29980
1920
Haiyan, China
8.5
234117
1923
Tokyo, Japan
8.2
142800
1927
Gulang, China
8.0
41000
1934
Nepal-India
8.4
10000
1935
Pakistan
7.5
30000
1939
Turkey
7.9
30000
1939
Chile
8.3
28000
7.2
20000
1948
Turkmen, Soviet
Union
1960
Chile
8.9
157000
1960
Morocco
5.9
13000
1962
Iran
7.2
12200
1966
Xingtai, China
7.2
8000
1968
Iran
7.3
12100
1970
Tonghai, China
7.7
1970
Peru
1975
1000
USD 50 billion
40000
15621
26783
7.8
50000
100000
Haicheng, China
7.2
1328
4292
1976
Tangshan, China
7.8
242000
160000
RMB 10 billion
1976
Guatemala
7.5
22400
1978
Iran
7.2
12000
1980
Italy
6.9
3114
1985
Mexico
8.1
10000
40000
1988
Armenia, USSR
6.8
25000
19000
RUB 10 billion
1989
California, USA
7.1
271
500
USD 2 billion
1990
Iran
7.7
50000
200000
1993
India
6.4
21000
10000
73 villages destroyed
6.7
72
10000
USD12.5 billion
Northridge,
California, USA
Remarks
12000
1994
24
San Francisco,
Economic Loss
USD 75 million
9 rescue teams
29 rescue teams
Continued
Time of
Epicenter
Magnitude
Death Toll
Serious Injury
Occurrence (year)
(place name)
(Ms)
(person)
(person)
7.2
5438
30000
USD96 billion
7.4
15637
42442
USD 20 billion
1995
Osaka-Kobe,
Japan
Economic Loss
Remarks
1999
Izmit, Turkey
1999
Chinese Taipei
7.6
1674
3924
20 rescue teams
2001
Gujart, India
7.6
16403
55863
10 rescue teams
2003
Algeria
6.7
2274
11452
USD 5 billion
38 rescue teams
2003
Bam, Iran
6.8
26200
30000
2004
Indian Ocean
9.0
300000
100000
21 rescue teams
Pakistan
7.6
87000
65038
USD 5 billion
19 rescue teams
6.4
6234
36300
USD 18 million
10 rescue teams
2005
2006
Yogyakarta,
Indonesia
35 rescue teams
47 rescue teams
Wenchuan, China
8.0
69197
374176
domestic and 5
teams abroad
2. Tsunami Disaster
1) General description
Tsunami means sea wave with ultra-large
wave length and cycle induced by vibrations
f rom u nd e rs e a move me nt su ch as an
earthquake. The tsunami wave in deep sea
waters can travel at a wave length of several
hundred miles with only one-meter wave
height, so its fluctuation generally will not
be felt or observed by the traveling ships.
The tsunami wave can travel at a speed of
above 1000 km/h, and its wave speed will
decrease with the sharp increase of its wave
amplitude when the tsunami wave moves
near to shallow water areas of the coastline. It
is in the coastal areas that tsunami becomes
the natural disaster posing the greatest threat
to life. The wave amplitude of a tsunami may
increase suddenly to above 35 meters, and
bring with it incomparable destructive power
even though the frequency of occurrence of
tsunamis is very low.
Tsunamis may be caused by many factors,
such as large-area vertical displacement of the
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Global Tsunami Sources 1650 B.C. to A.D. 2008 from Earthquake, Volcano, Landslide, and Other Causes
10W
10E
20E
30E
40E
50E
60E
50E
60E
70E
80E
90E
100E
110E
120E
130E
140E
150E
160E
170E
180E
170W
160W
150W
140W
130W
120W
110W
100W
90W
80W
70W
60W
50W
40W
110E
120E
130E
140E
150E
160E
170E
180E
170W
160W
150W
140W
130W
120W
110W
100W
90W
80W
70W
60W
50W
40W
Effects of the
Tsunami
60S
50S
Earthquake
Magnitude
Not
>=9 >=8 >=7 >=6 recorded
60S
50S
40S
40S
30S
30S
20S
20S
10S
10S
10N
10N
20N
20N
30N
30N
40N
40N
50N
50N
60N
60N
70N
70N
20W
No Deaths
10W
Transform
Convergent
0
10E
70S
Plate Boundaries
Divergent
20W
20E
30E
40E
70E
80E
90E
100E
Figure 3.1 Distribution map of historical tsunami events (by USA NGDC)
Figure 3.2 The tsunami in the Indian Ocean struck the coast
31
120W 60W
60E
120E
180
60N
60N
30N
30N
30S
30S
60S
60S
180
120W 60W
60E
120E
180
B Type
A Type
35
II
III
IV
VI
VII
Starting and
ending year
18971916
19171933
19341951
19521968
19691980
19811988
19992008
Interval in this
cycle (year)
19
16
17
16
11
17
10
Earthquake
frequency (time)
11
34
44
26
23
27
16
Activity belt
Along the
equator
Circum-Pacific
Along the
equator
Circum-Pacific
Along the
equator
Circum-Pacific
Along the
equator
30E
60E
90E
120E
150E
60N
60N
30N
30N
30S
30S
30E
60E
90E
120E
150E
Figure 3.5 Interior earthquake belt of the Himalayas - Alps and Eurasia
90E
120E
150E
180
150W
120W
90W
60W
30W
60N
60N
30N
30N
30S
30S
60S
60S
90E
120E
150E
180
150W
120W
90W
60W
30W
3.4 Suggestions
3.4.1 Experiment Field
Construction for
Earthquake Prediction
1. Selection and Construction of National
Earthquake Experiment Field in
Seismic Zone
Earthquake prediction experiment fields
should be constructed in typical area in
Himalayas-Tethys seismic zone, Eurasia
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
120E
15S
15S
105E
120E
135E
Figure 3.7 Earthquake epicenter distributions in Laut Banda-Indonesia Island Arc area
48
75W
90W
60W
15N
15N
75W
90W
60W
45W
30W
15W
45S
45S
60S
60S
75S
75S
105W
90W
75W
60W
45W
30W
70N
30N
10N
10S
30S
50S
160W
120W
80W
40W
40E
80E
120E
160E
offshore ascending;
Development of the prediction mode of
tsunami ascending value with super-high
definition (20m);
Research on tsunami quantitative warning
technology, especially research on the
assimilation technology of tsunami digital
mode;
Research on the evaluation technology for
storm disaster risk, and
IAP Report Natural Disaster Mitigation
51
52
Figure 3.12 Technical path of rapid judgment and trend forecast of serious earthquake disaster
rescue.
4) The research on serious disaster rescue
and restoration processing plan
An earthquake disaster rescue and restoration
processing plan should be established by
different levels of serious disaster, different
places and environments, different traditional
and prevention standards. Especially in
developing countries the research should
focus on the establishment of serious disaster
rescue and restoration processing plan,
such as rescue team, medical and assistance
personnel, rescue equipment and logistic
security, rescue material, evacuation and
arrangement for wounded personnel and
disaster area restoration plan.
57
4.1 Introduction
The weather, climate and water affect almost
all human activities as well as the safety of
human society and economic development.
At the same time, the influence of natural
disasters have been more pronounced.
According to statistics of the past 25 years
(1980-2005) from the World Meteorological
Organization (WMO), nearly 90% of the
natural disasters influencing humans were
related to meteorological and water-related
disasters. The economic loss and deaths
resulting from natural disasters were 75% and
70% respectively.
Statistical data from the World Meteorological
Organization shows that the top ten natural
disasters threatening human beings are tropical
cyclones, earthquakes, floods, thunderstorms,
hurricanes, snowstorms, avalanches, volcanos,
heat waves, landslides (mud-rock flow),
and tidal (tsunami), among which tropical
cyclone is the most common causes of death,
especially in Asia, and tropical cyclone and
storm tide cause the severest disasters. For
example, a strong storm tide in Bangladesh
from 12th to 13th November, 1970 drowned
nearly 300,000 people; a storm tide near
Chittagong of Bangladesh in the night of
April 29th, 1991 caused a tide of over 6m and
2m inundation, as well as 10 million disaster
victims, 140,000 deaths and over 3 billion
58
6%
8%
29%
12%
12%
18%
15%
Northwest Pacific Ocean
59
300
273.4
250
200
150
113.3
100
50
24.1
4.1
7.3
0.0
0 1950-1959 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005
Year
Figure 4.2 Economic Loss caused by Tropical Cyclone every ten years in the world (1950-2005)
Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE
140
132.1
120
100
80
60
45.2
40
20
0
0.0
0.8
1.7
7.8
Figure 4.3 Insurance Loss caused by Tropical Cyclone every ten years in the world (1950-2005)
Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE
200
Economic Loss/Billion USD
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year
Figure 4.4 Economic Loss caused by Tropical Cyclone each year in the world (1950-2005)
Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE
60
100
Insurance Loss/Billion USD
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year
Figure 4.5 Insurance Loss caused by Tropical Cyclone each year in the world (1950-2005)
Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
North
Atlantic
East
Pacifc
1975-1989
South
Indian
1990-2004
62
700
24-h
48 -h
72 -h
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
Year
2001
2003
2005
2007
Figure 4.7 China Meteorological Administrations (CMA) average 24-h, 48-h and 72-h typhoon
track forecast errors (from 1991 to 2008, unit: km)
Source: National Meteorological Center and Shanghai Typhoon Institute of CMA
900
72 -h
48 - h
24 -h
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
Year
1997
2000
2003
2006
Figure 4.8 Japan Meteorological Agencys (JMA) average 24-h, 48-h and 72-h typhoon track forecast errors
(from 1982 to 2007, unit: km)
Source: RSMC Tokyo Typhoon Center of Japan Meterological Administration
700
600
Forecast Errors (n mi)
700
24-h
48-h
72-h
96-h
120-h
500
600
500
400
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
0
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
Year
1995
2000
2005
Figure 4.9 US National Hurricane Centers (NHC) annual average hurricane track forecast errors
(from 1970 to 2008, unit: nautical mile)
Source: National Hurricane Center of NWS/NOAA.
64
10.4, 13.6 and 14.6 knots (or 5.3, 7.0 and 7.5
m/s); the CMA 24-h,48-h and 72-h typhoon
intensity forecast errors were 6.2, 8.7 and 8.5
m/s; the JMA 24-h, 48-h and 72-h typhoon
intensity forecast errors were 6.7, 8.5 and 9.5
m/s in 2007, respectively (Figure 4.12).
530
24-h
48-h
72-h
480
430
380
330
280
230
180
2007-2008
2006-2007
2005-2006
2004-2005
2003-2004
2002-2003
2001-2002
2000-2001
1999-2000
1998-1999
1997-1998
1996-1997
1995-1996
1994-1995
1993-1994
1992-1993
1991-1992
80
1990-1991
130
Year
Figure 4.10 RSMC La Reunion official average 24-h, 48-h and 72-h tropical cyclone
track forecast errors form 1990 through 2008
Source: RSMC La Reunion-Tropical Cyclone Center/Meteo-France
Atlantic Basin Tropical Cyclones
30
24-h
48-h
72-h
96-h
120-h
25
30
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
0
1990
1995
Year
2000
2005
Figure 4.11 US National Hurricane Centers (NHC) annual average hurricane intensity forecast errors
(from 1990 through 2008, unit: knot)
Source: National Hurricane Center of NWS/NOAA.
Table 4.1 Japan Meteorological Agencys average 24-h, 48-h and 72-h typhoon intensity forecast
errors (from 2000 to 2007, unit: hPa)
Year
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
24-h
13.0
10.9
10.8
11.0
11.4
12.8
14.1
13.0
48-h
15.6
15.3
15.3
16.1
17.0
17.1
17.0
72-h
18.6
19.0
18.6
19.9
65
10.0
9.0
8.0
NHC
7.0
US National Hurricane
Center
6.0
CMA
5.0
4.0
China Meteorological
Administration
3.0
JMA
Japan Meteorological
Agency
2.0
1.0
0.0
24-h
48-h
72-h
Figure 4.12 Comparison of official typhoon intensity forecast errors (unit: m/s) (NHC in 2008, CMA in 2008, JMA in 2007)
Source: Shanghai Typhoon Institute of CMA, RSMC Tokyo Typhoon Center of JMA,
National Hurricane Center of NWS/NOAA.
Though various nations have made remarkable progress in typhoon surveillance, forecast
and alert over the past two decades, there
are still substantial prediction errors in the
estimation of abnormal tracks and abrupt
increases of intensity. The techniques of
typhoon surveillance, forecast and alert are
far from meeting the accuracy of typhoon
forecast requirements for disaster prevention
and alleviation. Therefore, it is still a critical
task for those nations to improve the overall
level of typhoon sur veillance, forecast
and alert, especially on the combined use
of various observation, remote sensing
techniques and other related techniques,
in order to improve the forecast, alert and
assessment of major typhoon disasters.
Figure 4.13 NHCs real-time wind field analysis based on ground observation data, ground weather radar and GIS
of Tropical Storm Bonnie, Hurricane Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne in 2004 and Hurricane Katrina in 2005
Source: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/data_sub/wind.html
66
68
4.5 Suggestions
4.5.1 Recommendations
for Typhoon Disaster
Mitigation
Some recommendations and measures to
mitigate typhoon or hurricane disasters are
to:
1) Further improve the construction of
monitoring system of typhoon and
disaster
The typhoon monitoring system incorporating the meteorological satellite, Doppler
weather radar, aircraft detection, GPS, and
other remote sensing techniques need to
be established. The rapid and reliable data
transmission needs to be realized.
The related research and technology should
be strengthened, which mainly include:
Research on inversion technology for data
acquired from meteorological satellite and
Doppler weather radar;
R e s e a r c h a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o f k e y
monitoring technologies and methods
for tracking typhoon, assessing typhoon
intensity and prediction of typhoon trends,
and
Research on communication transmission
and processing technology for typhoon
disaster.
2) Further strengthen the research on
typhoon mechanism and theory
The theoretical research and operational
forecasting still face many difficulties and
69
70
40
39 Tanggu
38
37
36
35
Dandong
Dadong
Laohutan
Longkou Zhifudao
Chengshantou
Yangjiaogou
Xiaomaidao
Latitude
90
80
70
Shijiusuo
Lianyungang
60
34
33
Gaoqiao
Luchaogang
Zhapu
Zhenhai
Shenjiamen
30
29
28
27
26
25
50
Lsi
32
31
Quit
100
Shipu
Jiantiao
Haimen
Kanmen
Wenzhou
Ruian
Aojiang
Sansha
40
30
20
Meihua
10
Pingtan
Chongwu
Xiamen
118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128
Dongshan
Longtitude
Figure 4.15 The storm surge probability forecast of State Oceanic Administration, China
(Storm surge is higher than 1 m)
72
5.1 Introduction
Flood and drought induced disasters can
cause devastating consequences on human
Volcano
0.1%
Wild Fire
0.1%
Wind Storm
11.9%
Drought
33.1%
Slide
0.1%
Earthquake
1.6%
Flood
50.8%
Famine(natural)
0.8%
Epidemic
0.4%
Extreme Temperature
1.1%
Flood-related Disasters
Drought
Non Water-related Disasters
73
100
80
60
40
20
0
1973-1977
1978-1982
1983-1987
Year
1988-1992
1993-1997
1998-2002
Figure 5.3 Number of people affected by natural disasters around the world
Source: World Disasters Report, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
Figure 5.4 Regional distributions of casualties caused by disasters around the world
74
75
Year
Figure 5.5 Property losses caused by flood in the United States (1903 to 1996)
Year
Figure 5.6 Flood damages in the United States from 1903 to 1996
1960s, Japan has implemented nine floodcontrol projects. The budget for flood-control
has increased thanks to the rapid economic
development and this has greatly improved
the situation for flood-control. To address
new issues of flood and drought control in the
process of urbanization, a series of integrated
flood-control strategies in river basins were
implemented, which effectively constrained
the rising trend of property losses. However,
over the past ten years, the losses caused by
IAP Report Natural Disaster Mitigation
50,000
47,500
45,000
42,500
40,000
37,500
35,000
32,500
30,000
27,500
25,000
22,500
20,000
17,500
15,000
12,500
10,000
7,500
5,000
2,500
47,073
Intensity of private property
damage by flood**
35.6
35
30
Inundated area
(in 1,000 hectares)
230
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
25
20
15
10
1970
1975
1980
1985
Year
0.7
1990
1995
2001
5
0
25,000
Flood
Drought
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
1950
1952
1954
1956
1958
1960
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Year
Figure 5.8 Areas affected by flood and drought disasters in China from 1950 to 2006
77
80
5.3 Suggestions
82
5.4 Summary
With climate change, extreme climate patterns
would occur more frequently in the future;
with rapid urbanization, population and asset
growth in areas with high flood/drought
disaster, risk also has increased. Therefore,
our modern society becomes more vulnerable
when facing severe natural hazards and losses
from flood and drought disasters.
Science and technology are needed in disaster
management in order to deal with challenges
from increased risks of flood and drought
disaster in the 21st century and to perfect the
security assurance system for flood control
and drought resistance that is compatible with
socio-economic development. As countries
around the world have different physical and
geographical conditions and socio-economic
development situations, there are significant
differences in the risk characteristics of flood
and drought disasters as well as in the impact
on human society and ecological community.
As a result, each country or region should
adjust measures to local conditions when
selecting water regulation strategies, which
should not only obey the evolution order
of nature, but also follow the rules of socioeconomic development. The results will lead
to harmonious co-existence between human
and nature, and provide support to and
assurance for sustainable development.
Some issues that can have significant and
IAP Report Natural Disaster Mitigation
85
Table 6.1 Optical satellite for disaster management (2008) modified from NOAA
Resolution in meters (# of bands)
Launch date
System
Country
PAN
VNIR
SWIR
MIR
TIR
Swath in
KM
18/09/2007
WorldView-1
United States
0.5
32(3)
600
15/06/2007
CBERS-2B
China/Brazil
20
1.64(4)
113
10/01/2007
IRS Cartosat 2
India
20(3)
20(1)
120
28/07/2006
KOMPSAT-2
Korea
10(3)
20(1)
120
15/06/2006
Resource-DK-1
Russia
2.8(4)
20
25/04/2006
EROS B
Israel
0.7
20(4)
120
24/01/2006
ALOS
Japan
2.5
6(3)
23.9/70
87
Continued
Launch date
System
Country
PAN
VNIR
SWIR
MIR
TIR
Swath in
KM
27/10/2005
TopSat
United Kingdom
2.5
6.5(5)
78
27/10/2005
China
56(2)
56(1)
600
26/08/2005
MONITOR-E #1
Russia
8(4)
24
05/03/2005
IRS Cartosat 1
India
2.5
6.5(5)
78
01/12/2004
DMC ThaiPhat
Thailand
177
20/04/2004
RocSat2
Chinese Taipei
6.5(5)
78
21/10/2003
CBERS-2
China/Brazil
20
113
17/10/2003
IRS ResourceSat-1
India
35, 70
27/09/2003
DMC BilSat
Turkey
12
32(3)
600
27/09/2003
DMC NigeriaSat-1
Nigeria
30(4)
30(2)
60(1)
185
27/09/2003
DMC UK
United Kingdom
80(4)
185
26/06/2003
OrbView 3
United States
20
28/11/2002
DMC AlSat-1
Algeria
2.5(4)
11.3
04/05/2002
SPOT-5
France
2.5
6.5(5)
78
22/10/2001
Proba
ESA
10(3)
50
18/10/2001
Quickbird-2
United States
0.6
39(3)
600
07/12/2000
EO-1
United States
10
26(4)
52
05/12/2000
EROS A1
Israel
1.8
20(3)
120
28/06/2000
Tsinghua-1
China
5(4), 20(3)
20(3)
20(2)
20(3)
12
12/03/2000
MTI
United States
30(6)
30(3)
37
20/12/1999
KOMPSAT-1
Korea
6.6
94
15/12/1999
Terra
Japan/USA
2.5(4)
16
24/09/1999
IKONOS-2
United States
18/36(63)
14
15/04/1999
Landsat 7
United States
15
4(8)
16
24/03/1998
SPOT-4
France
10
36(3)
600
29/09/1997
IRS ID
India
14
28/12/1995
IRS IC
India
22/01/1990
SPOT-2
France
10
60
01/03/1984
Landsat 5
United States
4(4)
Imaging
frequency
Spatial
resolution
C-Band, 5.405
3 to 100 meters
GHz
Polarization
Look direction
Status
In operation (Since
2007)
RADARSAT-2
7 years
RADARSAT-1
5 years
C-Band,
5.3 GHz
10 to 100 m
Single HH
Right-looking
In operation (Since
1995)
Envisat ASAR
5 years
C-Band, 5.331
GHz
30 to 1000
meters
Right-looking
In operation (Since
2002)
TerraSAR-X
5 years
X-Band, 9.650
Single (HH, VV)
1 to 15 meters
GHz
Dual (VV/HH, VV/VH, HH/HV)
In operation (Since
2007)
Right-looking
In operation (Since
2005)
L-Band, 1.27
GHz
10 to 100
meters
Main sensor
Constellation resolution
Constellation return
duration
DMC
DMC partners
Optical
32m
0.5 day
SPOT
France
Optical
4m
26 days
Terra-SAR-X
Germany
SAR
1m
4 days
COSMOS SkyMed
Italy
SAR
1m
1.5 days
HJ
China
Optical/SAR
22m/5m
0.5 days
b e g au ge d by e x t r ap ol at i on f rom t he
frequency of smaller events. This provides
only a first approximation. To get a better
assessment, seismologists try to locate, map,
and understand local faults, frequency and
mechanism of rupture. This understanding is
placed in the context of the regional tectonic
setting of crustal motion (neo-tectonics). In
areas of low seismicity (where earthquakes
can still pose a serious threat), assessments
of frequency and magnitude are based on
geological evidence (slickensides, sand blows,
etc.) as well as tectonics. It is important to
recognize that this fundamental seismological
research makes a direct and important link
to the practical issues of effective earthquake
mitigation.
There is consequently a requirement for a variety
of spatial and temporal information which
can be obtained from EO and other sources.
Such information includes: demographics,
infrastructure (communications, utility and
high risk installations, hospitals, and relief
centers), building stock, seismic history,
neo-tectonics, lithology, fault location,
mechanism and dynamics, strain estimates
and budgets.
Potential users of such earthquake information are following:
National and local authorities (planners,
building regulators);
Government agencies with specific charge
to against earthquake risk;
National survey agencies;
Possible disaster management coordinating
bodies (see recommendations);
Possibly some relief agencies (planning for
disaster scenario);
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
Figure 6.1 The deformation map of Mani Earthquake (Mw7.5) occurred in East Kunlun Mountains of Tibet on Nov. 8, 1997.
The interferogram along the fault indicates typical left sharing deformation mechanism
92
6.2.4 Recommendations
Compile relevant base-maps and building
stock, distribution, density and infrastructure databases of high risk areas. Satellite
images in combination with aerial photos
and other map information should be
used to produce this information (if they
exist), or update the base information from
high resolution satellite images. Expand
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
and forecast.
Table 6.4 EO spatial resolution requirements for flooding phases and application
Application
Phase
Threshold
Optimum
Land use
Post-flood
Pre-flood
30 m (MSI)
4-5 m (MSI)
Infrastructure
Post-flood
Pre-flood
5 m (pan-vis)
1 m (pan-vis)
Vegetation
Post-flood
Pre-flood
250 m (M/HSI)
30 m
Soil moisture
Snow pack
Pre-flood
Pre-flood
1 km
1 km
100 m
DEM (vertical)
Post-flood
Pre-flood
1-3 m (InSAR/pan-vis)
0.10-0.15 m
Flood development
flood peak
During flood
Pre-flood
30 m (SAR/MSI/
VIS-pan/IR)
5m
Damage assessment
(feedback/lessons learned)
Post flood
2-5 m (MSI/pan-vis/SAR)
0.3 m
Bathymetry(near-shore)
Pre-flood
1 km (SAR/MSI)
90 m
96
Infrastructure
1-3years/6months
Months
Land use
1-3years/6months
Months
Vegetation
Soil Moisture
Snow Pack
3months/1month
1week/daily
2month/1week
Months
1day
1day
1-3years/months
months
Flood development
Flood peak
24-hr(tasking- delivery)
Hours-days(function of drainage
basin)
Hours-days(function of drainage
basin)/
Damage assessment
n/a
2-3days/<1day
1-3years/months
Months
SAR reference
image product
SAR crisis
image product
Speckle filtering
Geometric correction
Subset/Mosaic
Topographic maps
Speckle filtering
Geometric correction
Subset/Mosaic
Preprocessed SAR
reference image product
Data combination
(normalized difference index)
Threshold classification
Post-classification
Preprocessed SAR
reference image product
Hydrographic network
Map editing
Administrative boundaries
Figure 6.2 Flowchart for the generation of the flood extent maps using satellite radar (SAR) images
97
Figure 6.3 Flood extent mapping in a GIS environment based on MODIS-TERRA satellite data of April 9, 2004
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/nadm.html
Analysts:
Canada - Dwayne Chobanik
Mexico - Valentina Davydova
Elvia Delgado Diaz
Adelina Albanil
Reynaldo Pascual
U.S.A. - Brad Rippey
David Miskus*
Intensity:
D0 Abnormally Dry
D1 Drought - Moderate
D2 Drought - Severe
D3 Drought - Extreme
D4 Drought - Exceptional
H
AH
A
A
H
AH
AH
AH H
H
A
AH
H
AH
AH
AH
H
AH
H
AH
AH
Regions outside of the agricultural landscape
of Canada may not be as accurate as other
regions due to limited information.
99
Figure 6.5 The monitoring image of tropical storm NARGIS on May 2, 2008
101
Figure 6.6 The contrast images on Hainggyi before and after the attack of NARGIS. The above figure was taken on
November 11, 2004 and the below figure was taken on May 5, 2008
Yangon
Yangon
Figure 6.7 The contrast images taken by NASA at Myanmar before and after the NARGIS. The left image was taken
on April 15, 2008, in which rivers and lakes were clear. The right image was taken on May 5, 2008. It shows that after
the NARGIS attacked Myanmar, the whole coastal plain was flooded; the Yangon at the red triangle was almost totally
surrounded by the flood
Soil moisture;
Surface pressure;
Snow equivalent water content.
For satellites, the priority covers the need
for improving calibration of all data. In
the geostationary orbit there is a need for
improving imagers and sounders. There is
also a need to improve the timeliness and
temporal coverage of data delivery from low
Earth orbit. Improving the observations of seasurface winds, altimetry and Earth radiation
are the key observational needs from low
Earth orbit. More research is also needed into
Doppler technology, precipitation observation
capability and radio occultation techniques.
Medium-range
Extended
Forecasts
Forecasts
3-10 days
10-30 days
8 Cloud cover
11 Cloud imagery
14 Cloud type
19 Height of tropopause
27 Ozone profile
31 Sea-ice cover
33 Sea-ice thickness
35 Snow cover
37 Soil moisture
39 Temperature of tropopause
Weather
Nowcasting
Short-range
Observational Requirement
0-2 hours
Forecasts
1 Aerosol profile
2-72 hours
4
104
1. Startup Condition
106
Figure 6.8 The workflow for making first level response products as response to emergent natural disasters
Table 6.7 Workflow of Department of Satellite Remote Sensing, Ministry of Civil Affairs response
to emergent natural disasters
Fourth grade response
Startup situation
Same as the workflow of Ministry of Civil Affairs response to emergent natural disasters
On-duty System
Start-up
Real-time
monitor data
Base Data
Airborne remote
sensing
Not start-up
107
Continued
Fourth grade response
Data process
Field survey
Product
distribution
Expert
consultation
Not start-up
Start-up
Distribute products by EMAIL, FAX and RTX, intranet and website before 15 o'clock on the same day.
Not start-up
108
Response
products
Start-up
1) Flood Disaster
Indicators considered in Model Model analysisAnalysis product
109
2) Earthquake Disaster
Indicators considered in Model Model analysisAnalysis product
110
3) Typhoon Disaster
Indicators considered in Model Model analysisAnalysis product
111
112
7.2 Suggestions to
Scientific Community
IAP member academies should actively make
an effort to organize and participate in all levels
of S & T disaster mitigation programs, e.g.
intergovernmental collaboration programs,
and programs operated from international
and regional foundations, and to undertake
efficient exploration on the cutting-edge
issues regarding S & T disaster mitigation.
The tasks of basic research and multidisciplinary studies on natural disaster
reduction are strongly recommended for
science community as follows:
To identify areas subject to severe natural
disasters against the background of climate
change, to carry out scientific assessment
and analysis with regard to the sensitivity
and fragility of local people to natural
disasters, and taking account of different
levels of social and economic development
and S & T development status;
To conduct further research on the adaptability of human society to severe natural
disasters, and make a comprehensive study
on the adaptability to natural disasters,
taking into account societal sustainable
development issues such as poverty and
113
116
117
7. Would you mark (from 1 6, 1 being the least severe and 6 the most severe) the order of severity in the following
disaster types in your country? (The severity is determined by economic damage and the disasters occurring frequency)
Earthquakes
Floods
Droughts
Forestry Fires
Storms
Tsunamis
118
Continued
8. What kinds of public awareness and training programs concerning natural disasters have been conducted in your
country in recent years, and how many people have been trained?
9. What are the statistical standards about natural disaster data in your country? Is the scientific metadata shared in
your country? Could international researchers obtain disaster data (economic damage, death toll, disaster types, disaster
occurring frequency, etc.) from your country?
10. In the procedure of disaster mitigation, please list the major technological facilities used for monitoring and early
warning.
11. (I) Please give brief information of the remote sensing data requirements in the systems used in your country.
(II) To whom do you report ?
(To the government)
12. Is there any organizational structure for handling disaster issues in your country (at government, provincial, local
levels)? Has an emergency response system been set up in your country?
13. How is disaster research organized and financed?
14. Can you give 1-2 typical cases in your country? And whats your general opinion on NDM in your country or region?
15. Are there other factors in relation to GDR and DR that should be taken into account?
119
120
Importance
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Critical Role
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
Very Important
0, 0%
Count
0, 0%
Critical Role
very important
6, 43%
not important
not very important
important
8, 57%
very important
Critical Role
Figure 1 The statistical result of the appraisement for the scientific research on natural disaster mitigation
121
Table 2 The estimation of severity grades of major natural disasters in different nations or regions
Country/region
Storm
Flood
Drought
Forest Fire
Earthquake
Tsunamis
Cuba
India
Greece
Malaisia
Argentina
Albania
Australia
Jamaica
Japan
New Zealand
Pakistan
Sweden
Chinese Taipei
China
6
5
4
3
2
Storm
Flood
Drought
Forest Fire
Earthquake
Tsunamis
1
0
China
Chinese Taipei
Sweden
Pakistan
New Zealand
Japan
Jamaica
Australia
Albania
Argentina
Malaisia
Greece
India
Cuba
Cuba
India
Greece
earthquakes, geochemistry
Malaysia
earthquakes, tsunamis
Argentina
earthquakes
Albania
Australia
Jamaica
Japan
New Zealand
Pakistan
Sweden
storms, flooding
Chinese Taipei
China
3 Researches on Natural
Disaster Reduction: the
Programmes of Inner
Countries or Regions
and the International
Cooperation
The organization and financial support of
Natural Disaster Mitigation IAP Report
N/A, 1, 7%
count
increasing, 1,
7%
strengthen, 1,
7%
enough
enough, 6,
43%
not enough
strengthen
increasing
N/A
not enough, 5,
36%
Figure 3 The statistic pie chart for the status of funds on research programs of NDM
Table 4 The status of the funds for natural disaster mitigation research
Country/regions
124
Status
Cuba
not enough
India
enough
Greece
enough
Malaisia
enough
Argentina
not enough
Albania
not enough
Australia
enough
Jamaica
not enough
Japan
strengthen
New Zealand
N/A
Pakistan
enough
Sweden
increasing
Chinese Taipei
adequate
China
4 Education of Disaster
Reduction and the
Construction of
Emergency Response
System
126
Annex 3 Glossary
ACDR
ADAA
EO
Earth Observation
EOS
Agency
ESA
ESCAP
ADPC
ADRC
ALOS
ESSP
AMDAR
ETRP
AMP
EU
European Union
AREP
EWC
Environment Programme
FAO
Pacific
United Nations
ARF
ASEAN
FEMA
AVHRR
FEWS
Radiometer
GDACS
AVNIR-2
System
GEO
GEOSS
BEST
CAS
CCD
GFDL
CEODE
GHG
Greenhouse Gases
Earth
GIS
GMS
GOES
CEOS
CGMS
CMA
CNES
CNSA
CODATA
CONAE
CRInSAR
CSA
CT
Computerized Tomography
DCP
DMCii
DMISCO
ECF
Systems
Satellites
GOS
GPS
GSHAP
GWP
HFA
HFCS
Hydrofluorocarbons
HWRP
IAP
IATF/DR
IBRD
127
ICDO
ICDRR
ICHARM
NOAA
mitigation risk
NRT
NWP
OCHA
ICRC
ICSU
OSOCC
ICT
PALSAR
IDDR
IDNDR
PFCS
Perfluorocompounds
Reduction
PGA
PRISM
IDRC
Affairs, UN
Aperture Radar
Conference
IMO
International Meteorological
PSInSAR
Organization
PSIR
Pressure-State-Impact- Response
RP
Regional Programme
Group
RS
Remote Sensing
IOC
RSMC
IPCC
INSARAG
Center
Change
SAR
Infrared
SCA
IRCC
SF6
ISRO
SHIFOR
ISDR
SHIPS
IR
Scheme
Reduction
ITU
SID
IWTC
SSM/I
Cyclones
TCOP
JAXA
TOMS
JMA
TOVS
LEO
UN/ISDR
LOS
Look of Sight
Ms
Earthquake scale
Reduction
MSG
MTP
NADM
UNDP
NASA
UNEP
Administration
UNESCAP
NASDA
NATO
NFP
NGDC
NGO
Non-government organization
NHC
128
UNDAC
UNICEF
UNIDO
UNOCHA
WCDR
WCP
UNOOSA
WFEO
UN-SPIDER
WFP
Organizations
World Food Programme
WHO
USGS
WMO
UV
Ultraviolet
WSSD
VAAC
VHR
Development
129
1030'E
330'N
10330'E
1040'E
10430'E
1050'E
10530'E
1060'E
330'N
W
S
Songpan County
3230'N
Qingchuan County
Pingwu County
Guangyuan City
3230'N
Heishui County
320'N
Beichuan County
Jiangyou City
320'N
Jiange County
Maoxian County
3130'N
Zitong County
Anxian
Lixian
3130'N
Mianyang City
Mianzhu City
Luojiang City
Shifang City
Deyang City
Wenchuan County
Dujiangyan CityPengzhou City
310'N
Legend
Guanghan City
County boundary
1030'E
10330'E
15
30
1040'E
60
90
10430'E
120
310'N
Flight area
km
1050'E
10530'E
1060'E
Figure 1 The flight area of the two Remote Sensing aircrafs from May 14 to June 5, 2008
2 Earthquake Disaster
Mitigation
2.1 Geological Disaster
Due to the unique geological and geographic
condition in Wenchuan, the earthquake
i n du c e d l arge nu mb e rs of s e c on d ar y
geological disasters, such as landslide,
landslip, and debris flow, which not only
led to heavy casualties and financial loss,
but also severely damaged the roads, rivers,
engineering projects, farmlands, and forests.
The emergence and development of the
earthquake accompanied with the destruction
of vegetation, landform, rock, soil, and other
natural elements, are the major causes of the
change in the color and texture shown in
the remote sensing images. According to the
statistics, the earthquake ruptured a large area
of approximately 29,000 km2. The geological
disaster covers an area of 2,250 km2, which is
7.8 % of the total area.
The planar feature of the distribution of
IAP Report Natural Disaster Mitigation
134
10417'29"E
10347'29"E
10447'29"E
Songpan County
Qingchuan County
328'9"N
328'9"N
Songpan County
Jiangyou County
Lo
ng
s
en
Zitong County
ha
3138'9"N
3138'9"N
Mao County
Mianyang City
Shifang County
318'9"N
318'9"N
Mianzhu County
Santai County
Pengzhou County
Shehong County
Pi County
Jintang County
Qingbaijiang Dist. Chengdu
10417'29"E
10347'29"E
0
11.8cm
10447'29"E
0 5 10
20
30
kilometers
40
136
Table 1 Estimated house collapse ratio corresponding to the earthquake intensity levels
Earthquake intensity
7()
8()
9()
10()
11()
13
38
31
11
12
23
27
45
56
83
17
32
47
61
76
Earthquake intensity
11()
Yingxiu Town
Yinxing Town
Dabao Town
Jingtang Town
Hongbai Town
Tianchi Town
Beichuan Town
Chaping Town
Chenjiaba Town
Nanba Town
9()-10()
Figure 6 Photo showing the overflowing water caused by the blocked river
N
Hongyuan
Sonpan
Qinchuan
Pingwu
Guangyuan
Wangcang
Mesui
BeiChuan
Maoxian
Maerkan
Jianyou
Jiange
Cangxi
Zitong
Lixian
Anxian
Mianzhu
Shifang
Xiaojin
Baoxin
Wenchuan
Epicenter
Langzhong
Mianyang
Luojian
Deyang
Pengzhou Guanhao
Dujianyan
Zhongjian
Pixian
Chongzhou
Jintao
Chendu
Wenjian
Lusan
60 km
0 15 30
Dayi
Lezhi
Yanting
Santai
Xichong
Legend
Interpreted Town Places
Interpolated Collapse Ratio (%)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Contours of Collapse Ratio (%)
0-19
20-39
40-59
60-79
80-100
Longmen Mountain Faults
Wenchuan-Maoxian Faolts Zone
Beichuan-Yinxiu Faolts Zone
Anxian-Guanxian Faolts Zone
Epicenter
County Borders
Figure 7 The interpolated house collapse ratio map overlaid with the Longmenshan Mountain faults in the disaster region
Figure 8 The airborne optical remote sensing image showing the collapsed houses of Yingxiu, Wenchuan County
Figure 10 Photos of broken Xiayu bridges in Beichuan, taken after the Earthquake
140
3 Lives Rescue
The quake caused deaths, injuries, and cut of
electricity, communications, transportations
and water supplies. The disaster not only
devastated lives and livelihoods, but also
destroyed services and infrastructures.
Official figures of the Ministry of Civil Affairs
of China (as of July 21, 2008 12:00 Chinese
Standard Time) state that 69,197 were
confirmed dead, including 68,636 in Sichuan
141
4 Conclusions
An emergency disaster monitoring system
with advanced, practical, fast and reliable
technical ability should be further established.
At e m e r ge n c y t i m e , an aut h or it at i ve
institution should be guaranteed with
National Dispatching Power so that it
could effectively coordinate key space
infrastructures to achieve a high degree of
data sharing among different agencies.
142
References
ADRC, (2006), Natural Disasters Data Book-2005, March
2006.
Annual review: Natural catastrophes 2005, Munich Re,
Topics Geo 2005.
Annual review: Natural catastrophes 2004, Munich Re,
Topics Geo 2004.
Annual review: Natural catastrophes 2003, Munich Re,
Topics Geo 2003.
Frolova N., Larionov V., Bonnin J., (2007 June), Simulationbased information systems for multi-hazard risk
assessment and near real time loss estimations due to
strong earthquakes. 14th TIEMS Annual Conference
143
144
145
146
Members
Australian Academy of Science
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Brazil
Cuban Academy of Sciences
Academy of Scientific Research and Technology, Egypt
Union of German Academies of Sciences and Humanities
Science Council of Japan
Akademi Sains Malaysia
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
The Royal Society, UK
Ex Officio: TWAS, the academy of sciences for the developing world
For further information on the InterAcademy Panel on International Issues please see:
http://www.interacademies.net/