Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Brendan Graham
Victoria Munro
Erica Ma
Marta Swiercz
Executive summary
MGMS Environmental was retained by the Township of Uxbridge (hereafter referred to as the
Client) to complete a Phase II Environmental Assessment (ESA) on a property ranging from
Centennial Drive to north of Brock street, Uxbridge (hereafter referred to as the Site). The Site
is presented in Figure 1. This Phase II was completed in general accordance with the Canadian
Standards Association (CSA) Z769-00 and O. Reg. 153/04 (as amended by 511/09). The Phase I
ESA recommended that a Phase II ESA be completed to evaluate potential environmental
concerns associated with the soil and groundwater
The subject Site includes 30 and 34 Brock Street West, Uxbridge and the surrounding study area
of a 250 meter radius. The sites are currently home to a hair salon, youth centre, police station,
and residential units. The Phase II ESA study site is an irregularly shaped area of approximately
0.2 hectares, as depicted in Figure 4.
The purpose of this Phase II ESA is to establish a chemical profile of the current soil and
groundwater conditions based on the information provided from the Phase I ESA within the
subject Site. The Phase I recommends that the following require further investigation:
Records of expired Underground Storage Tanks (UST) containing gasoline as there are
no records of the decommissioning of these tanks which represent a potentially
contaminating activity.
Records of a former gas station located on the site, which poses a contaminating activity
as it is generally accepted that gas stations always have leaks.
The lack of mitigation records regarding the spills of gasoline and heating oil.
Records of two spills from underground storage tanks caused by damage from moving
equipment and causes unknown; both of these spills have possible and confirmed
environmental impacts.
The aim of this assessment was to address the following objectives:
Determine the location and concentration of contaminants from USTs, and gas and diesel
spills in the land or water on, in, or under the Site.
Obtain information regarding environmental conditions in the land or water in order to
undertake a risk assessment.
Determine if the applicable Site Condition Standards and conditions for contaminants on,
in or under the Phase II site are met.
Determine whether the following contaminants are present on, in or under the Site:
BTEX, VOC, PAH, or Heavy metals (Lead).
Steps that could be taken to confirm, refute, or delineate contamination.
The limitations of this Phase II ESA are as follows,
Limited turnaround time to develop new sampling plans after receiving preliminary
results.
Clarity of historic information provided.
There were no access limitations to the planned drilling locations.
i
The site investigation and records review conducted for the Site includes findings such as:
TSSA reports no UST was reported on the subject Site,
EcoLog ERIS identified that USTs are located on the subject site.
Ontario Spills records indicate two spills pertaining to pipeline hits.
Environmental Protection Zone located north of the subject site.
Topographic maps identified that groundwater and precipitation runoff flows in a
northerly direction.
These findings helped facilitate an on-site reconnaissance of the subject Site, in which the
following key findings were found:
Environmental monitoring wells were found on site.
Interview with owner stated previous spills of gasoline and heating oil.
Designated substances potentially found in building structures.
Surrounding properties of concern include a Shell gas station.
Soil and groundwater samples were taken and selected samples were sent to Niagara
Laboratories and tested for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Benzene-TolueneEthylbenzene-Xylene (BTEX), Heavy Metals (Lead), and Petroleum Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAH). This Phase II ESA included the drilling of 19 boreholes over three sampling rounds.
After the completion of the sampling and analysis, the total cost of the project was calculated at
$46,671.12.
VOC and BTEX contamination was found to be located at the Macs Milk on the subject site.
There was confirmed VOC and BTEX contaminants above the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment
Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act - Tables 2 and 8 in the
soil samples at the Mac's Milk location to a depth of 23m; however, the groundwater samples
were found to be below the Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part
XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act - Tables 2 and 8 (see section 8.1.3).
Based on the findings of this Phase II ESA, we suggest a risk assessment should be conducted
for the Site in order to determine the potential risks the contaminants from the Site may pose to
the human and natural environment. Risk assessments are useful to help owners and developers
determine property specific standards that ensure that all major pathways for contaminants are
addressed, and all contaminants in, on or under the property are assessed.
ii
Table of Contents
Executive summary.......................................................................................................................... i
1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Site Description ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Property Ownership .............................................................................................................. 1
1.3 Current and Proposed Land Uses .......................................................................................... 1
1.4 Application of Site Condition Standards .............................................................................. 1
1.5 Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 2
1.6 Limitations ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Physical Setting ..................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Past Investigations ................................................................................................................ 3
3.0 Scope of the Investigation ......................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Overview of Site Investigation ............................................................................................. 4
3.2 Media Investigated ................................................................................................................ 4
3.3 Deviations from Sampling and Analysis Plan ...................................................................... 5
4.0 Investigation Methods ............................................................................................................... 5
4.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 5
4.2 Drilling and Excavation ........................................................................................................ 5
4.3 Soil: Sampling....................................................................................................................... 5
4.4 Groundwater: Monitoring, Sampling, Well Installation ....................................................... 6
4.5 Analytical Testing and Iterative Process............................................................................... 6
4.6 Residue Management Procedures ......................................................................................... 6
4.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control....................................................................................... 6
4.8 Costs...................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 Review and Evaluation ............................................................................................................. 8
5.1 Groundwater: Elevations and Flow, Hydraulic Gradients, and Quality ............................... 8
5.2 Soil: Texture and Quality ...................................................................................................... 9
5.3 Contaminants on the Property............................................................................................... 9
5.4 Contaminated Media ............................................................................................................. 9
5.4.1 Soil ................................................................................................................................. 9
5.4.2 Groundwater .................................................................................................................. 9
6.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................... 9
6.1 Summary of Site Conditions ............................................................................................... 10
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Site Description
The subject site includes 30 and 34 Brock Street West, Township of Uxbridge. The Site is used
for general commercial uses, and consists of the Mondo hair salon, Uxbridge Youth Center, and
a Durham Regional Police Service Station. The Property Identification Numbers (PIN) of the
Site(s) are 26844-0102, 26844-0103, 26845-0002 and 26845-0071. The Site is an irregular shape
and is approximately 0.2 hectares in size. The Site is located within the Uxbridge-Brooke
watershed and, located north of the subject Site, is an Environmental Protection Zone (EPZ)
meaning it is an environmentally sensitive area. Based on the topographic map, the groundwater
and precipitation runoff is expected to flow in a northerly direction towards the EPZ. The Phase
II area includes both commercial and institutional land uses. This includes automotive service
shops, Shell Canada, retailers, handyman services, and offices.
standard for non-agricultural property uses, and Table 2: Full Depth Generic Site Condition
Standards in a Potable Ground Water Condition standard for commercial property uses. The
application of the Site Condition Standards will aid in the completion of the objectives for
carrying out this Phase II ESA.
1.5 Objectives
This Phase II Environmental Site Assessment will address the following:
There are records of expired USTs containing gasoline and there are no records of the
decommissioning of these tanks which represent a potentially contaminating activity.
There are records that a former gas station was located on the site and it is generally
accepted that gas stations always have leaks.
The lack of mitigation records regarding the spills of gasoline and heating oil that
occurred on the Phase I study area which represents a potentially contaminating activity.
Records of two spills from underground storage tanks, causes are damage and from
moving equipment and unknown; both spills have possible and confirmed environmental
impacts.
Records of environmental monitoring wells.
This Phase II ESA aims to complete the following objectives:
Determine the location and concentration of contaminants from USTs, and gas and diesel
spills in the land or water on, in, or under the Phase II site.
Obtain information regarding environmental conditions in the land or water in order to
undertake a risk assessment, and compare to the Site Condition Standards in the EPA.
Determine if the applicable site condition standards and conditions for contaminants on,
in or under the Phase II site are met.
Determine whether the following contaminants are present on, in or under the site:
BTEX, VOC, PAH, or Heavy metals (Lead).
Determine steps that could be taken to confirm, refute, or delineate contamination.
The aforementioned objectives were completed to the best ability of MGMS Environmental, as
the limitations are not expected to have impeded the results of the study.
1.6 Limitations
The limitations of this Phase II ESA are as follows,
Clarity of historic information provided. For example, records of UST for gasoline found
on EcoLog ERIS, but the Customer Service Representative at Technical Standards and
Safety Authority claimed there were no registered USTs for the subject Site.
Limited turnaround time to develop new sampling plans after receiving preliminary
results.
There were no access limitations to the planned drilling locations.
2.0 Background
2.1 Physical Setting
Table 1. Physical setting of the Site.
Physical
Subject Site
Properties
30 Brock Street West, Uxbridge
Address
34 Brock Street West, Uxbridge
Size of the Site 30 Brock Street: Approximately 680.8m2
34 Brock street: Approximately 308m2
Total area: 0.2 hectares
Approximate for both addresses:
UTM
17T 850298m East
Coordinates
6885552m North
Institutional and Commercial
Land Use
Adjacent
Roadways found within and adjacent of the Site.
Properties
A creek is adjacent from the north to the southern limits of the Site.
Environmental Protection Zone is found north of the Site.
Commercial properties found east and west of the Site.
Centennial Park found south of Site (formerly a landfill).
Map Findings Topographic map
Flow of water is expected flow north towards the EPZ.
Hydrogeological Map
The Site is situated within the Southern Ontario Lowlands geographical
area.
Soil Type
Records
were sent to and analyzed by a CALA certified laboratory - Niagara Laboratories. The
laboratory analytical methods, procedures, and protocols were followed in accordance with O.
Reg. 153/04 (as amended by 511/09).
4.1 General
A site reconnaissance was completed prior to drilling to observe for potential health and safety
risks. Ontario 1-Call utility services was contacted initially to ensure the locations of utilities in
the area. Any and all power lines or underground utilities were noted in a prepared document
which was provided to the drilling crew. A health and safety plan was prepared and all crew
members wore the required personal protective equipment.
to ensure the obtained samples and analytic data provided by the laboratory are representative of
the Site samples.
The following QA/QC protocols were be taken:
Sampling jars were labeled and arranged in order of sample collection prior to
arriving on the Site during sampling date.
Soil samples were be extracted with a decontaminated split spoon apparatus.
Sampling apparatus were changed to minimize risk of cross-contamination of
samples.
Monitoring wells were installed and purged before taking groundwater samples under
MOECC guidelines 6.4.2 and 6.4.3.
Equipment and apparatus used for installing and purging monitoring wells were used
only for the well to minimize risk of cross-contamination.
Separate Nitrile gloves were used for handling each sample.
Soil and water samples were immediately placed in respectively labeled glass jars and
coolers on ice (to maintain ~4 degrees Celsius) for preservation as instructed by the
laboratory.
Secondary soil samples were collected in labeled airtight glass jars at the same time
as the primary sample.
Non-specific monitoring and sampling equipment (i.e. portable gas meter and water
quality meter) were cleaned and rinsed before and in between uses with Alconox and
distilled water.
Collection of Blank QC soil samples were to the laboratory.
Documentation of location and time of samples and QC samples collected.
Documentation of in-field testing methods and results.
Documentation of sampling protocols and procedures.
All sampling and monitoring methods were done in accordance with the MOECC
Sampling Guideline outlined by the APGO.
Selecting a certified Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation (CALA)
accredited laboratory for sample analysis.
Use of QC check samples to assess the quality of the measurements by the laboratory.
Use of different Nitrile gloves whenever a different sample was handled.
Documentation and schedule of Chain of Custody of the soil and water samples.
Laboratory data documentation of the following:
o Calculation and computations used in the analysis
o Methods used to assess uncertainty of analysis and methods used to minimize
uncertainty
o Computer programs used in analysis
o Analytic equipment calibration and standardization methods
o Routine maintenance record on analytical equipment
o Measurement comparison from the machines
o Actions taken to correct faulty equipment
Documentation and schedule of data custody from the laboratory.
If corrections are made on the data, clear documentation of reason of corrections and
where the corrections were performed in the procedure.
7
Logs of data entry methods and data transfer procedures and schedules.
If parameters are missing from the analysis or invalid, a record of reasons for missing the
parameters or invalidity must be provided.
Documentation of lab-provided QC checks.
Cross-checking laboratory analysis from in-field testing.
Inspections on the laboratory to ensure compliance with outlined QA/QC program.
4.8 Costs
Table 2. Cost breakdown of the project.
Item
Cost
Base Charge
$25.00
BTEX Lab Package
TPH Lab Package
SlipCap
Waterra Valves
Waterra Tubing
Bailer
$5.00/BH = (5 x 4) = $20
$22.00/BH = (22 x 4) = $88
$0.40/foot = $13.12
$15.00/BH = (15 x 4) = $60
6.0 Conclusions
The Phase I records review noted 34 Brock Street as being the site of a former retail
gasoline outlet. This finding was of particular concern for this Phase II ESA. Further
sampling was carried out at this location to determine if a former gasoline storage tank on
this property had contributed to any areas of potential environmental concern.
Two soil samples taken via borehole in the back parking lot of the 34 Brock Street
property noted levels of BTEX and VOCs in the soil above the Table 2 & 8 of Ontarios
Site Specific Soil Standards in Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended 511/09).
After a general area of contaminants was delineated, further sampling was done in an
area around the noted contamination to determine an area confirmed to be clear of both
BTEX and VOCs. The delineated area in this study was found to be 5076.04 m3.
Due to the depth of contamination noted (23m), the fine grained texture of soils, the low
potential for migration and the costs associated with remediation on this site, it has been
recommended that a risk assessment be completed for this property to better determine
site specific standards and to scientifically study the potential risks this contamination
plume may pose to the human and natural environment in the immediate area.
9
VOC
0.5
1.8
2.7
3.8
2.9
3.9
10
Round 2
SS3/B2/R2
(18m)
SS4/B2/R2
(21m)
.0150
.2300
.0513
.521
5.3
.0025
.1587
.027
.1568
1.3
All soil found outside the delineated area is confirmed not to be above the Site Specific Soil
Standard under Ontario Regulation 153/04 (as amended 511/09). All groundwater sampled
throughout this Phase II ESA was confirmed to be below the Site Specific Soil Standard under
Ontario Regulation 153/04.
6.4 Recommendations
Based on the aforementioned results and conclusions, MGMS Environmental recommends that
any remediation measures specifically target the delineated area in this Phase II ESA. However,
several site specific conditions act as limitations to possible remediation solutions. Soils in the
compacted area are mainly silty clays, and with approximately 5076.04 m3 of material found at a
depth of at least 23m, many ex-situ or off-site remediation options such as a dig and dump
excavation are simply not feasible.
In the first round of sampling, soil and groundwater samples were taken to the north of the site
and had no notable signs of contamination. In the second round of sampling, the boreholes taken
around the APEC found that no notable contamination had migrated out of the delineated area.
For these reasons, we do not believe the contaminants on site to be of particular risk of
migration. The silty clay soil on the subject property will also hold the contamination in place
better than a coarse grained sediment, such as sand. The current commercial land use of the
property is not particularly sensitive, and is occupied by a convenience store. For the above
reasons, we believe a risk assessment should be conducted for the Site to scientifically determine
the risks the site may pose to the human and natural environment in the immediate area. Risk
assessments can help owners/developers achieve property specific standards that ensure that all
major pathways for contaminants are addressed and all contaminants in or on the property are
assessed.
7.0 Limitations/Modifications/Learnings
7.1 Sampling plan
In terms of the sampling plan, MGMS took the safe route and drilled a significant number of
boreholes to ensure that all of the contamination was found and addressed. While our team took
a large number of boreholes, as a group of new consultants, we believe this approach was
necessary based on the nature of the Site and its past history of USTs and spills. While we
believe we took the fast, easy and logical approach, with more experience conducting Phase II
ESAs, MGMS would be more likely to address the contamination with fewer boreholes and
monitoring wells in order to save on costs if confronted with a similar site in the future.
In our original sampling plan we had included Inorganic materials to be analyzed by the
laboratory; however, after further consideration we agreed that it was no longer necessary. With
11
more experience and knowledge of which samples require which testing methods, we will be
able to further save on costs in the future.
In round three of the sampling stage, PAHs and Lead packages were excluded from laboratory
analysis. As BH3/RD1 and BH2/RD2 returned positive for contamination, no lead or PAH levels
were noted in soil samples. If we were to do something differently, PAHs and lead would be
excluded from analysis altogether. Upon second consideration, there was not enough reason to
include those parameters based on the information yielded in the records review of the Phase I
ESA.
7.1.2 QA/QC
For QA/QC, if we were to do anything differently we would make a more concrete plan for
sampling blanks or spikes. Sampling blanks were only used in rounds one and three, and
sampling spikes were not used in any rounds. If done differently, both blanks and spikes would
be used across all three rounds in a more consistent plan.
7.1.3 Analysis
In terms of analysis, we ideally would have taken fewer boreholes in the first and second rounds
because the contamination was isolated to one area on the property. The first round should have
been more direct in addressing the information yielded in the records review, as BH1/RD1 and
BH2/RD1 were likely unnecessary. Those locations were taken to establish a baseline of
conditions for the whole Phase II site. They were located at the north and south corners of the
Phase II property to determine the state of soil and groundwater and if there was any change
across the site. However, we should have been more direct in addressing the concerns of the
Phase I assessment instead of attempting to establish site wide conditions of groundwater flow
through the site. Therefore, while we were being careful in our sampling plan, we could have
saved a significant amount in our overall costs by having a better idea of which areas to drill. In
addition, analyzing for lead and PAHs would be eliminated because there was not a strong
enough reason to include those parameters based on the Phase I ESA findings and
recommendations.
12
8.0 References
ALS Environmental. (n.d). Holding times and types of containers. Retrieved from:
http://www.caslab.com/Holding-Times-Container-Types/
Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (2013). Report template for Phase Two
Environmental Site Assessment conducted in accordance with Ontario Regulation
153/04, as amended.
Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario (2011). Report template for Phase Two
Environmental Site Assessment conducted in accordance with Ontario Regulation
153/04, as amended. Retrieved from
https://www.apgo.net/files/APGO_Brownfields_Guidance_Document.pdf
DesignMantic. (n.d). Free Logo Design. Retrieved from http://www.designmantic.com/
Laboratory Services Branch Ministry of the Environment. (2011). Protocol for Analytical
Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental
Protection Act. Retrieved from: https://dr6j45jk9xcmk.cloudfront.net/documents/1006/36-12-protocol-for-analytical-methods-en.pdf
Soil Engineers Ltd. (2012). Phase One Environmental Site Assessment, Proposed Culvert
Replacement [for] Centennial Drive to north of Brock Street West, the township of
Uxbridge. Reference Number: 1204-S048E.
http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/programs/taiga-environmental-laboratory/price-guide
http://www.kodiakdrilling.ca/pricing/cost-estimator/
13
9.0 Appendices
14
SS2/B1
Spoon)
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead), PAH,
Inorganic
Compounds.
Soil (Split
Spoon)
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
15
SS3/B1
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS4/B1
11
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS5/B1
15
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS6/B1
Soil (Split
Spoon)
GW/B
1
Groundwater
Monitoring
Well
SS1/B2
Soil (Split
Spoon)
(Lead), PAH,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead), PAH,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead), PAH,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
16
SS2/B2
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS3/B2
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS4/B2
11
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS5/B2
15
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS6/B2
Soil (Split
Spoon)
GW/B
2
Groundwater
Monitoring
Well
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
BTEX
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
contamination in Borehole 2.
Previous retail fuel outlet in 1970s
raises concerns of lead based fuels on
subject property. Local heating oil
spill raises concerns of heavy fuels
(PAHs).
Second sample taken from borehole
2. Far northern edge of subject
property.
17
SS1/B3
Soil (Split
Spoon)
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
SS2/B3
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS3/B3
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS4/B3
11
Soil (Split
Spoon)
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
18
SS5/B3
15
Soil (Split
Spoon)
SS6/B3
Soil (Split
Spoon)
GW/B
3
Groundwater
Monitoring
Well
Inorganic
Compounds.
VOC,
BTEX,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead),
PAHs,
Inorganic
Compounds.
Heavy
Metals
(Lead)
BTEX, TPH,
Heavy
Metals
(Lead)
19
Figure 1.Borehole locations for Sampling Plan 1 (Photo from Google Maps, modified by
Brendan Graham).
20
5
6
7
8
9
10
Details
Iterative Plan
Sample at 30m only sent for analysis if contamination noted at 25m.
Sample at 35m only sent for analysis if contamination noted at 30m.
21
Figure 2. Borehole locations for Sampling Plan II (Photo from Google Maps, modified by
Brendan Graham).
22
Depth (m)
6m, 23m
6m, 23m
6m, 23m
6m, 23m
6m, 23m
6m, 23m
Details
QC Blank
LEGEND
-Borehole 1/Round 3
-Borehole 2/Round 3
-Borehole 3/Round 3
-Borehole 4/Round 3
-Borehole 5/Round 3
-Borehole 6/Round 3
-Borehole 2/Round 2 (Completed)
-Borehole 3/Round 1 (Completed)
Figure 3. Borehole locations for Sampling Plan III (Photo from Google Maps, modified by Brendan
Graham).
23
BH1/RD1
BH3/RD1
BH1/RD2
BH2/RD2
BH3/RD2
BH4/RD2
BH5/RD2
BH6/RD2
BH7/RD2
BH8/RD2
BH9/RD2
BH10/RD2
BH1/RD3
BH2/RD3
BH3/RD3
BH4/RD3
BH5/RD3
BH6/RD3
24
MDL (ug/g)
SS1/B1
SS2/B1
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
SS5/B1
SS1/B2
SS2/B2
SS3/B2
SS4/B2
SS5/B2
SS6/B2
GW/B2
SS1/B3
SS2/B3
SS3/B3
SS4/B3
SS5/B3
SS6/B3
GW/B3
PAHs
.0029
.1500
.024
.15
.5
1.5
.05
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.0037
.3031
.4068
.2583
.2932
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.1502
.3801
.4306
.4586
.3997
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.0245
.0863
.0644
.0721
.0982
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.1587
27.32
22.68
26.88
25.58
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
1.8
2.7
3.8
2.9
3.9
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS6/B1
GW/B1
Lead
<mdl
<mdl
SS3/B1
SS4/B1
VOCs
25
MDL (ug/g)
SS1/B1/R2 (6m)
SS2/B1/R2 (15m)
SS3/B1/R2 (18m)
SS4/B1/R2 (21m)
SS5/B1/R2 (25m)
SS6/B1/R2 (30m)
SS7/B1/R2 (35m)
SS1/B2/R2 (6m)
SS2/B2/R2 (15m)
SS3/B2/R2 (18m)
SS4/B2/R2 (21m)
SS5/B2/R2 (25m)
SS6/B2/R2 (30m)
SS7/B2/R2 (35m)
SS1/B3/R2 (6m)
SS2/B3/R2 (15m)
SS3/B3/R2 (18m)
SS4/B3/R2 (21m)
SS5/B3/R2 (25m)
SS6/B3/R2 (30m)
SS7/B3/R2 (35m)
SS1/B4/R2 (6m)
SS2/B4/R2 (15m)
SS3/B4/R2 (18m)
SS4/B4/R2 (21m)
SS5/B4/R2 (25m)
SS6/B4/R2 (30m)
SS7/B4/R2 (35m)
GW/B4/R2 (15m)
SS1/B5/R2 (6m)
SS2/B5/R2 (15m)
SS3/B5/R2 (18m)
SS4/B5/R2 (21m)
SS5/B5/R2 (25m)
SS6/B5/R2 (30m)
SS7/B5/R2 (35m)
SS1/B6/R2 (6m)
SS2/B6/R2 (15m)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Xylene
VOCs
Lead
PAHs
.0029
.1500
.024
.15
.5
1.5
.05
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.0150
.0025
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.2300
.1587
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.0513
.029
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
.521
.1568
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
5.3
1.3
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
26
SS3/B6/R2 (18m)
SS4/B6/R2 (21m)
SS5/B6/R2 (25m)
SS6/B6/R2 (30m)
SS7/B6/R2 (35m)
SS1/B7/R2 (6m)
SS2/B7/R2 (15m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS3/B7/R2 (18m)
SS4/B7/R2 (21m)
SS5/B7/R2 (25m)
SS6/B7/R2 (30m)
SS7/B7/R2 (35m)
SS1/B8/R2 (6m)
SS2/B8/R2 (15m)
SS3/B8/R2 (18m)
SS4/B8/R2 (21m)
SS5/B8/R2 (25m)
SS6/B8/R2 (30m)
SS7/B8/R2 (35m)
SS1/B9/R2 (6m)
SS2/B9/R2 (15m)
SS3/B9/R2 (18m)
SS4/B9/R2 (21m)
SS5/B9/R2 (25m)
SS6/B9/R2 (30m)
SS7/B9/R2 (35m)
SS1/B10/R2 (6m)
SS2/B10/R2 (15m)
SS3/B10/R2 (18m)
SS4/B10/R2 (21m)
SS5/B10/R2 (25m)
SS6/B10/R2 (30m)
SS7/B10/R2 (35m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
27
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl-benzene
Xylene
VOCs
MDL (ug/g)
.0029
.1500
.024
.15
.5
SS1/BH1/R3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS2/BH1/R3 (23m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS1/BH2/RD3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS2/BH2/RD3 (23m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS1/BH3/RD3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS2/BH3/RD3 (23m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS1/BH4/RD3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS2/BH4/RD3 (23m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS1/BH5/RD3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS2/BH5/RD3 (23m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS1/BH6/RD3 (6m)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
SS3/BH6/RD3
(BLANK QC
SAMPLE)
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
<mdl
28
Figure 4. General location map (Image from Google Earth, modified by Brendan
Graham).
29
MGMS ENVIRONMENTAL
30