Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The principle of gender equality has been provided in the Indian Constitution in its
Preamble, Fundamental rights, Fundamental Duties and DPSP. Constitution not only
provides equality to women, but also empowers the state to adopt measures of positive
discrimination in favor of women and YES the government has adopted the measures by
giving them constitutional privileges and special initiatives. They are:Constitutional Privileges
(i)
Equality before law for women (Article 14)
(ii)
The State not to discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion,
The State to make any special provision in favour of women and children
(Article 15 (3))
(iv)
The State to direct its policy towards securing for men and women equally the
right to an adequate means of livelihood (Article 39(a)); and equal pay for equal
work for both men and women (Article 39(d))
(vi)
The State to make provision for securing just and humane conditions of work
The State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people
(Article 47)
(x)
To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the
Not less than one-third (including the number of seats reserved for women
belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the total number of
seats to be filled by direct election in every Panchayat to be reserved for women and
such seats to be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Panchayat
(Article 243 D(3))
(xii)
Not less than one- third of the total number of offices of Chairpersons in the
Not less than one-third (including the number of seats reserved for women
belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the total number of
seats to be filled by direct election in every Municipality to be reserved for women
and such seats to be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a Municipality
(Article 243 T (3))
(x)
Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and women in such manner as the legislature of a
State may by law provide (Article 243 T (4))
SPECIAL INITIATIVES FOR WOMEN
(i)
In January 1992, the Government set-up this statutory body with a specific mandate
to study and monitor all matters relating to the constitutional and legal safeguards
provided for women, review the existing legislation to suggest amendments
wherever necessary, etc.
(i)
Reservation for Women in Local Self -Government
The 73rd Constitutional Amendment Acts passed in 1992 by Parliament ensure onethird of the total seats for women in all elected offices in local bodies whether in
rural areas or urban areas.
(ii)
The National Plan of Action for the Girl Child (1991-2000)
The plan of Action is to ensure survival, protection and development of the girl child
with the ultimate objective of building up a better future for the girl child.
(iv) National Policy for the Empowerment of Women, 2001
The Department of Women & Child Development in the Ministry of Human Resource
Development has prepared a National Policy for the Empowerment of Women in
the year 2001. The goal of this policy is to bring about the advancement,
development and empowerment of women.
punishable with two to seven years of imprisonment. The prison sentence for the
rape of any other woman ranges from seven years to life.
Marriageable age: The minimum age for marriage for a boy is 21, but 18 for a
girl. This is a legal extension of the patriarchal mindset that believes that a wife
should always be younger than the man.
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act: Women are still not equal guardians of
their children. A father is considered the natural guardian of a child, although the
custody of offspring under the age of 5 will ordinarily be awarded to the mother.
The Goa Law on polygamy: A law recognises the second marriage of a Gentile
Hindu man of Goa if his previous wife does not have any children before the age of
25 or if she does not have a male child by 30.
No right to marital property: Upon separation or divorce, an Indian woman is
entitled only to maintenance from her husband. She has no right to the assets, such
as house or commercial property, bought in her husbands name during the
marriage.
According to the Global Gender Gap Report released by the World Economic
Forum (WEF) in 2011, India was ranked 113 on the Gender Gap Index
(GGI) among 135 countries polled. Since then, Indias rankings on the World
Economic Forum's Gender Gap Index (GGI) has fallen to 114/142 in 2013.
Over 50% of Indian labor is employed in agriculture. A majority of rural men work
as cultivators, while a majority of women work in livestock maintenance, egg and
milk production. About 78 percent of rural women are engaged in agriculture,
compared to 63 percent of men. About 37% of women are cultivators, but they are
more active in the irrigation, weeding, winnowing, transplanting, and harvesting
stages of agriculture. About 70 percent of farm work was performed by women in
India in 2004.[16] Women's labor participation rate is about 47% in India's tea
plantations, 46% in cotton cultivation, 45% growing oil seeds and 39% in
horticulture.
There is wage inequality between men and women in India. The largest wage gap
was in manual ploughing operations in 2009, where men were paid INR 103 per day,
while women were paid INR 55, a wage gap ratio of 1.87.
LAWS ON SEX DETERMINATION
Two laws that prohibit the sex selection of a fetus in India are the Medical
Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (MTP), as amended in 2002, and the Pre-
married woman or her husband for the purpose of limiting the number of children.
Where the pregnancy is more than twelve weeks but less than twenty weeks, the
opinion regarding the medical necessity for an abortion in the above circumstances
must be formed in good faith by two medical practitioners. When the pregnancy is
less than 12 weeks, the opinion of one medical practitioner is necessary for the
approval of an abortion. All abortions must be performed in a government hospital,
regardless of the length of the pregnancy.
PNDT Act (Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques)
The PNDT Act of 1994, later amended in 2002, was enacted with the objective as
stated in the preamble;
to provide for the prohibition of sex selection, before or after conception, and for
regulation of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for the purposes of detecting genetic
abnormalities or metabolic disorders or chromosomal abnormalities or certain
congenital malformations or sex-linked disorders and for the prevention of their
misuse for sex determination leading to female feticide and for matters connected
therewith or incidental thereto.
Thus, the PNDT Act prohibits the use of all technologies for the purpose of sex
selection, which would also include the new chromosome separation techniques.
With the blanket prohibition contained in sections 3, 4 and 5 of the PNDT Act, there
is effectively a ban on sex selection in India. It is not possible to use pre-natal
diagnostic techniques to abort fetuses whose sex and family history indicate a high
risk for certain sex-linked diseases, or to choose a fetus whose sex is less
susceptible to certain sex-linked diseases. This blanket prohibition may appear to
be a contradiction to the provisions of the MTP Act, which permits the abortion of a
fetus that is at a risk of being born with serious physical or mental disabilities.
While it is legally permissible to abort a fetus at risk of serious physical or mental
disabilities, it is not permissible to select a fetus of a sex which is less likely to suffer
from a sex-linked disease.
The PNDT Act primarily provides for the following:
Prohibition of sex selection, before and after conception.
Regulation of prenatal diagnostic techniques (e.g., amniocentesis and
ultrasonography) for the detection of genetic abnormalities, by restricting their use
to registered institutions. The Act allows the use of these techniques only at a
registered place, for a specified purpose, and by a qualified person who is registered
for the purpose.
Prevention of the misuse of such techniques for sex selection, before or after
conception.
Prohibition of the advertisement of any techniques used for sex selection as well as
those used for sex determination.
Prohibition on the sale of ultrasound machines to persons not registered under this
Act.
Punishment for violations of the Act. Violations carry a five-year jail term and a fine
of approximately US $200-$1,000. All offenses are cognizable when police may
arrest without a warrant. They are also non-bailable and non-compoundable.
Indian laws do not, under any circumstance, allow sex determination tests to be
undertaken with the intent to terminate the life of a fetus developing in the mothers
womb, unless there are other absolute indications for termination of the pregnancy
as specified in the MTP Act of 1971. Any act causing the termination of the
pregnancy of a normal fetus would amount to feticide, and in addition to rendering
the physician criminal liable, is considered professional misconduct on his part,
leading to his penal erasure.
But bans on child marriage, pre-natal sex selection tests and dowries are
poorly enforced, while laws excluding daughters and widows from inheriting land
still exist, a study by the U.N. World Population Fund (UNFPA) found.
India has skewed child sex ratios that rights campaigners describe as alarming. The
number of girls under six years old has fallen for the past 50 years and
there are now 919 girls to every 1,000 boys, against 976 in 1961, according
the 2011 census.
Experts say a strong preference for sons is the root cause behind the uneven ratios,
with some parents taking illegal gender tests to abort female foetuses.
Twelve million Indian girls have been aborted in the last three decades, a
2011 study in the British medical journal Lancet found.
Other girls die due to preventable diseases such as pneumonia and diarrhea,
because they are sidelined in favour of their male siblings when it comes to access
to health care and nutrition.
The Indian census data suggests there is a positive correlation between abnormal
sex ratio and better socio-economic status and literacy. Urban India has higher child
sex ratio than rural India according to 1991, 2001 and 2011 Census data, implying
higher prevalence of sex selective abortion in urban India. Similarly, child sex ratio
greater than 115 boys per 100 girls is found in regions where the predominant
majority is Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or Christian; furthermore "normal" child sex ratio of
104 to 106 boys per 100 girls are also found in regions where the predominant
majority is Hindu, Muslim, Sikh or Christian. These data contradict any hypotheses
that may suggest that sex selection is an archaic practice which takes place among
uneducated, poor sections or particular religion of the Indian society.
Hence, we could state that statements such as sex selection is a practice of rural
people are all misconceptions and it is a practice done in urban area too and this is
possible by the support of politicians and local police as stated by a Delhi Court.