Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CE 26/27-I-02-14
KING SAUD UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
By
SALEH DHAHAWI Al-SHAMMARI
RIYADH
JUMADA AWAL,1427
JUNE,2006
By
Saleh Dhahawi Al-Shammari
RIYADH
JUMADA AWAL,1427
JUNE,2006
Triaxial Tests"
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
Advisor
Signature:
Dr. Abdullhakem AL-Ghanem
Examiner
Signature:
Dr.Abdul Aziz AL-Enazi
Date:June 2006
CONTENTS
page
List of tabel
iv
List of figures
Acknowledgement
ix
Absract
CHAPTER ONE:INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
2.4
13
16
16
16
17
17
17
25
25
25
25
26
CHAPTER FIVE:CONCLUSION
36
APPENDIX A
37
REFERENCES
44
List of tables
Table NO:
2.1
Title
page
15
3.1
18
3.2
Hydrometer method
19
3.3
21
3.4
22
3.5
23
4.1
Area of failure
35
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig: NO
2.1
Title
page
2.2
Stress system
2.3
11
2.4
12
3.1
20
3.2
24
4.1
4.2
4.3
29
4.5
28
4.4
27
30
4.6
4.7
31
32
33
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the Name of Allah,Most Gracious,Most Merciful
I wish to express my deep appreciation and gratitude to my project supervisor
Dr. Abdullhakem AL-Ghanem and the examiner member Dr.Abdul Aziz ALEnazi for their since encouragement ,helpful suggestion and valuable guidance
throughout all stages of my project.
My deep thanks to engineer:Abdusstar and Jalal in the soil laboratory for their help
through laboratory testing.
Saleh AL-Shammari
Abstract
10
Chapter One
Introduction
1.1.
Background:
The civil engineer, in facing the practical problems raised by the use of the soil
11
the stress and strain conditions and drainage patterns are different. However, these
methods are effected by many factors, one such factor is the rate of loading at which
the external load is applied to the specimen.
The test may, however, be performed in various ways; and, in order to
distinguish between the different types of test and relate them to the more common
practical problems, it is necessary to make a brief survey of the basic factors
controlling shear strength and deformation.
12
Chapter Two
Literature Review
2.1.
(2-1)
where V/V denotes the change in volume per unit volume of soil,
denotes the change in total normal stress,
u denotes the change in pore pressure
and
13
The difference u is termed the effective stress and denoted by the symbol
' . It is important to note that equation (2.1) is valid whatever the contact
area between the solid particles [2],[3]. through within the stress range
encountered problems this area is likely to be small.
This relationship may be illustrated by a conclusion of practical importance
which follows directly from equation (2.1). A volume change will occur,
without any change in the applied or total stress, if the pore pressure
undergoes a change (Fig. 2.1). This is the primary cause of the long-term
settlements of buildings founded on clay, in which the excess pore pressure
set up during construction dissipates only at a slow rate. It is also the
explanation of the additional settlements caused by ground water lowering,
either for construction work or for water supply[4].
2) The shear strength of soils, as of all granular materials, is largely determined
by the frictional forces arising during slip at the contacts between the soil
particles. These are clearly a function of the component of normal stress
carried by the solid skeleton rather than of the total normal stress [5].
2.2.
14
Fig. [2.1]
The effect of pore-pressure dissipation on volume change
(a) stress system applied to element;
(b) relationship between decrease in volume, V/V, and increase in
effective stress ' ;
(c) changes in total stress during test: stage I increase in total stress
under undrained conditions; stage II dissipation of pore pressure
under constant total stress;
(d) changes in pore pressure u;
(e) changes in effective stress ' ;
in a fully saturated soil.
(f) Changes in volume, V/V.
15
Shear strength is not a unique property of a soil but depends on many factors.
The shear strength of a test sample is measured in the laboratory by
subjecting it to certain defined conditions and carrying out a particular kind
of test. Failure can occur in the soil as a whole, or within limited narrow
zones referred to as failure planes. Some of the factors on which the strength
of soil as measured in a laboratory test depend are as follows[6]:
(a) Mineralogy of grains.
(b) Particle shape, size distribution and configuration.
(c) Voids ratio and water content.
(d) Previous stress history.
(e) Existing stresses in-situ.
(f) Stress changes imposed during sampling.
(g) Initial state of the sample.
(h) Stresses applied prior to test.
(i) Method of test.
(j) Rate at which loading is applied.
(k) Whether or not drainage is allowed during the test.
(l) Resulting pore water pressure.
(m) Criterion adopted for determining the shear strength.
Items (a) to (e) are related to natural conditions which cannot be controlled
but can be assessed from field observations, measurements and geological
evidence. Items (f) and (g) depend on the quality of sampling and the care
taken in handling and sample preparation, but (g) can be controlled with
remolded or compacted samples (e.g. density and moisture content). Testing
methods, items (h) or (k), can vary considerably and determine (l). Certain
triaxial test procedures are recognized as normal practice and many of these
are describe in this volume.
2.2.2. Stress-Strain Relationships:
Shear Strength Parameters:
16
For the specified failure criterion it is necessary to be able to relate the shear
strength on a potential failure surface to the stress normal to that surface,
denoted by n (total stress) or 'n (effective stress).
In terms of total stress the parameters are the cohesion, c, and the angle of
shear resistance, . The relationship between f n when failure occurs on
the plane is given by Coulombs equation.
f = c + n tan
(2-2)
Triaxial Test:
17
The water pressure, usually called cell pressure, can be measured directly
from a manometer or gauge, and an adaptation also enables the pore water
pressure inside the sample to be recorded.
2
3
Fig. [2.2]
Stress system
During the application of this load the sample experience shortening in the
vertical direction with a corresponding expansion in the horizontal direction.
Under these conditions the axial stress is the major principal stress 1; the
intermediate and minor principal stresses (2 and 3, respectively) are both
equal to the cell pressure.
Connections to the ends of the sample permit either the drainage of water and
air from the voids in the soil or, alternatively, the measurement of the pore
pressure under conditions of no drainage.
18
dissipation of water and no drainage is allowed during the
application of the deviator stress.
ii)
19
Fig. [2.3]
The triaxial apparatus.
20
Fig. [2.4]
Stress system in triaxial test.
21
2.4.
represents the intrinsic bond between grains. The bond is affected by the cementing
agents and the soluble salts. Also, the soil parameters C, are dependent upon
many factors.
Cohesion C is dependent upon:
1) Cementing agents and soluble salts.
2) Stress history of the soil mass, desiccation. And water content.
3) The fabric and structure of the soil mass.
4) Grain shape, size and surface roughness.
Angle of internal friction is dependent upon:
1) Void ratio or relative density.
2) Particle shape.
3) Grain size distribution.
4) Particle surface roughness.
5) Water content.
6) Intermediate principle stress.
7) Particle size.
8) Overconsolidation or prestress.
Void ratio, related to the density of the sand, is perhaps the most important
single parameter that affects the strength of sand, the lower the void ratio (higher
density or higher relative density), the higher the shear strength. The Mohr circles for
the triaxial test data shown in Fig. (2.2) for various confining pressures and four
initial void ratios. It can be seen that as the void ratio decreases, or the density
increases, the angle of internal friction or angle of shearing resistance increases.
The effects of relative density or void ratio, grain shape, grain size
distribution, and particle size on are summarized in Table 2.1.
22
23
[7]
Table 2.1
The effect of void ratio, grain shape, grain size distribution, and particle size on *
Loose
Dense
D10
No. General Description Grain shape
(mm) Cu
e
(deg)
e
(deg)
Ottawa standard
Well
1
0.56 1.2 0.70
28
0.53
35
sand
rounded
Sand from St. Peter
2
Rounded
0.16 1.7 0.69
31
0.47
34
sandstone
Beach sand from
3
Rounded
0.78 1.5 0.89
29
--Plymouth. MA
Silty sand from
4
Franklin Falls Dam Subrounded 0.03 2.1 0.85
33
0.65
37
site, NH
Silty sand from
Subangular
5
vicinity of John
to
0.04 4.1 0.65
36
0.45
40
Martin Dam, CO
subrounded
Slightly silty sand
Subangular
from the shoulders
6
to
0.13 1.8 0.84
34
0.54
42
of Ft. Peck Dam,
subrounded
MT
Screened glacial
7
sand, Manchester,
Subangular 0.22 1.4 0.85
33
0.60
43
NH
Sand from beach of
hydraulic fill dam,
8
Subangular 0.07 2.7 0.81
35
0.54
46
Quabbin Project,
MA
Artificial, wellSubrounded
graded mixture of
9
to
0.16
68 0.41
42
0.12
57
gravel with sands
subangular
No.7 and No.3
Sand for Great Salt
10
Lake fill (dust
Angular
0.07 4.5 0.82
38
0.53
47
gritty)
Well-graded,
11 compacted crushed
Angular
----0.18
60
rock
* By A. Casagrande.
The angle of internal friction of the undisturbed St. Peter sandstone is larger than
60 and its cohesion so small that slight finger pressure or rubbing, or even stiff
blowing at a specimen by mouth, will destroy it.
Angle of internal friction measured by direct shear test for No. 8, by triaxial tests
for all others.
24
Chapter Three
Experimental Work
3.1.
Introduction
Since the soil properties at every location is different, the soil must be
evaluated in many different parts or sites in order to study all characteristics of the
soil.
However, the soil properties must be determined from laboratory tests.
The testing program includes determinations of physical characteristics of the
soil such as grain size analysis and specific gravity tests compaction tests and limits
and indicates.
3.2.
Soil Characteristics
The soil used in this project was brought from Al-Nassem east of Riyadh.
Number of tests were conducted on this soil to find its physical characteristics.
25
in Table (3.1) and the gradation curve was plotted in Fig. (3.1). The soil is
classified as silty sand (SM).
2) Hydrometer Method:
Sieve analysis for them. For the particles passing sieve No. 200. I should
make precipitation and put them in a small dish in the oven and after drying
use them for hydrometer method. In this test, a dispersing agent of 125ml of
4% sodium metaphosphate (NaPO3) mix with the soil and water were used to
make the suspension volume of 1000ml. The test data recorded in Tables 3.2.
3.4. Specific Gravity Test:
A specific gravity tests were performed on one soil sample, and their results
are testes in Table (3.3). The specific gravity of the soil is taken to be the average of
the two values in Table (3.3) was found to be equal to 2.68.
3.5. Limits and Indices:
Several tests were performed to determined the Atterberg Limits, liquid
limit, plastic limit and shrinkage limit and indices like plasticity index, flow index
and toughness index. These limits and indices are useful to identify and classify the
soil. The test data recorded in table 3.4.
3.6. Compaction Test:
The moisture-density (compaction) test is designed to aid the field
compaction of the soil so as to develop the best engineering properties of the
material. It is assumed that the strength or shearing resistance of the soil increases
with higher densities.
Compaction tests are necessary to determine the optimum water content and
the maximum dry density for the soil and there is a definite relationship between the
26
soil moisture content and the degree of dry density to which a soil may be
compacted, and that for a specific amount of compaction energy applied on the soil.
There is one moisture content termed the (optimum moisture content) at which
particular soil attains its maximum dry density. The result of this test is given in table
3.5.
27
Table 3.1
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS (Mechanical)
Sample Location : Riyadh East
Dry wt. of sample =
500 gms.
Sieve
Sieve
diam.
Wt.
retained
no.
(mm)
(g)
retained
passing
4.76
0.000
100.0
10
2.000
0.02
0.004
100.0
16
1.180
7.26
1.452
98.5
20
0.850
19.35
3.870
96.1
40
0.425
80.66
16.132
83.9
60
0.250
166.37
33.274
66.7
100
0.150
260.17
52.034
48.0
200
0.075
342.61
68.522
31.5
28
Table 3.2
GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS - HYDROMETER METHOD
Sample Location :
Riyadh East
Date of Testing :
Date
Time
of
test
Elapsed
time
Temp.
Co
(min.)
Corr.
Hyd.
L
from
table
(65)
L/t
Finer
Hyd.
Corr.
read.
Only
for
mensc.
Actual
hyd.
Read.
readings
Ra
Rc
K,
from
Corr.
SQRT
of
table
Diam.
L/t
(6-4)
D , mm
Finer
26101426
09:20
17101426
09:50
0.5
25
49
46.3
92.0
50
8.1
16.2
4.0249
0.0128
0.0515
28.99
25
47
44.3
88.1
48
8.4
8.4
2.8983
0.0128
0.0371
27.74
25
45
42.3
84.1
46
8.8
4.4
2.0976
0.0128
0.0268
26.49
25
42
39.3
78.1
43
9.2
2.3
1.5166
0.0128
0.0194
24.61
25
39
36.3
72.2
40
9.7
1.213
1.1011
0.0128
0.0141
22.73
16
25
36
33.3
66.2
37
10.2
0.6375
0.7984
0.0128
0.0102
20.85
32
14.5
31
28.15
56.0
32
11.1
0.3469
0.5890
0.01285
0.0076
17.63
64
24
26
23
45.7
27
11.9
0.1859
0.4312
0.0128
0.0055
14.40
185
23.5
21
17.85
35.5
22
12.7
0.0686
0.2620
0.0128
0.0033537
11.18
1470
24
16
13
25.8
17
13.5
0.0092
0.0958
0.0128
0.0012266
8.14
29
30
Table 3.3
SPECIFIC GRAVITY TEST
Depth : 0.5
m
729.53
729.02
25.5
29.5
698.15
697.65
0.99875
0.9977
50
50
Ww = ws+wbw-wbws
18.62
18.63
Gs = Ws/Ww
2.682
2.678
31
32
33
34
Chapter Four
Results and discussion
4.1 SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL BY TRIAXIAL TESTS
Six triaxial tests were performed during this study with different drainage
condition in order to evaluate the shearing strength parameters .The tests were
performed as follows:
1-Three consolidated drained tests (C.D.tests)
2-Three consolidated undrained tests(C.U.tests)
4.2 Consolidated Drained Tests (C.D.tests)
Consolidated drained triaxial tests were conducted on specially molded
samples at chamber pressure of 100 kpa,200 kpa and 300 kpa. The stress strain
curves for the three samples are plotted in figure (4.1 ).The stress circles at failure
Mohr-Coulomb envelope for the samples in figure (4.2).
.
From figure (4.1 ) it can be observed that the shearing strength of the soil increases
with increasing consolidation pressure.
4.3 Total and EffectiveConsolidated Undrained Tests (C.U.tests)
Three consolidated undrained triaxial tests with measurements of change in
pore water pressure were conducted on specially molded samples with different
chamber pressures.The stress strain curves for the three samples are plotted in
figure (4.3) .The stress circles at failure Mohr-coulomb envelope for the samples in
figure(4.4).
4.4 Comparision of the C.D and C.U tests
The Mohr-coulomb envelope for the C.D. tests gave the shear strength
parameters C=30 kpa and =29(reference figure 4.2),whereas the Mohr-coulomb
envelope for the C.U.tests gave C=5kpa and =30.5(reference figure 4.4) and area
failure for C.U.tests =0.1361 mm^2 and show table 4.1
35
4.5 Stresses paths
The (p-q )circles Mohr coulomb for the C.D. tests in figure (4.6) gave the
range of stresses a=26.24kpa and =25(reference figure 4.6), whereas the Mohrcoulomb envelope for the total C.U.tests gave a=4.31kpa and =27 (reference
figure 4.7) and Mohr-coulomb envelope for effective C.U.tests gave a=8.4kpa and
=28.25 (reference figure 4.8)
36
37
1200
1100
c=30kpa
a n g le = 2 9 d e g
1000
900
S h e a r S tr e s s , k P a
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
N o r m a l S tr a in , k p a
Figure:4.2 total and effective stress failure envelopes for C.D.triaxial test.
38
39
1000
900
c o h e s io n :
to ta l= 5 k p a
e ffe c tiv e = 1 0 k p a
800
a n g le o f f r ic t io n :
to ta l= 3 0 .5 d e g .
e ffe c tiv e = 3 2 .5 d e g .
S h e a r S tr e s s , k P a
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
N o rm a l S tre s s k p a
Figure :4.4 total and effectives stress failure envelopes for C.U.triaxial
.
Test.
40
41
1200
1100
a=26kpa
a n g le = 2 5 d e g r e e
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
p
Figure:4.6 stresses pathes C.D.test.
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
42
1000
a = 8 .4 k p a
a n g le = 2 8 .2 5 d e g r e e
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
P
Figure:4.7 stresses paths effective C.U.triaxial test.
800
900
1000
43
1000
900
a = 4 .3 1 k p a
a n g le = 2 7 d e g r e e
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
P
Figure:4.8 stresses paths for total C.U.triaxial test.
800
900
1000
44
3 kpa
(1-3) kpa
uf %
Af
100
217.15
37.5
0.17269
200
419.1
48
0.11453
300
632.59
76.5
0.12093
Af
avg=.1361mm2
45
CHAPTER FIVE
CONCLUSION
Based on laboratory investigation of the soil the following conclusions may be
1-The soil can be classified as SM (silty sand) soil as per unified soil classification
system.
2-From the test results,the total angle of internal friction yields to =30.5 with
acohesion of 5kpa while the effective angle of internal friction was =32.5 with
cohesion of 10kpa.The results that there are small change in the value of the angle of
internal friction while the value of cohesion were doubled .This pore that effect of
pore water pressure on the cohesion more than on the angle of internal friction.
3-The relatisonship between the volume change and the strain are consistant with the
calculated skepton pore water parameters at failure (Af);which they both indicate that
the sample were under consolidated.
4-The results of stress path both tests were consistant with that of provded in the
litruture.since that the parameters obtained from the polted stress paths parameters
are consistant with that can be calculated from existing relationships given in the
literature;which as follows
sin=tan
a=c cos
5-From all tests,the stress strain realationship were followed the residual shear
failure.This indicator of the sample consolidation conditions since,the residual shear
failure are for lose sand in granular soils and for under or normal consolidation for
cohesion soil.while the peak shear (brittle)failure are for dense sand in granulare soils
and for over consolidated clay.
46
APPINDEX (A)
47
TRIAXIAL TEST
48
Volume
Volume
Def.
Load
dalta
Unit
Area
change
change
Reading
(cm3)
(cm3)
(div)
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
(div)
(mm)
8.42
0.00
0.0
0.0000
8.42
0.00
20
10
0.2
8.42
0.00
40
28
8.4
-0.02
60
8.23
-0.19
8.2
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
Area
Stress
Strain
dv/v
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
(%)
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
31.92
0.28
0.000
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
89.13
0.56
42
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
133.32
0.85
80
53
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
167.76
1.13
-0.22
100
59
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
186.22
1.41
8.19
-0.23
120
64
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
201.42
1.69
8.12
-0.30
140
67
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
210.26
1.97
8.1
-0.32
160
71
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
222.17
2.25
8.1
-0.32
180
73
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
227.77
2.54
8.08
-0.34
200
75
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
233.33
2.82
-0.42
250
79
2.5
0.0352
0.9648
10.2592
244.00
3.52
7.9
-0.52
300
82
3.0
0.0423
0.9577
10.3347
251.41
4.23
7.82
-0.60
350
83
3.5
0.0493
0.9507
10.4112
252.61
4.93
7.8
-0.62
400
84
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
253.76
5.63
7.8
-0.62
450
86
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
257.86
6.34
7.78
-0.64
500
87
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
258.90
7.04
7.27
-1.15
650
91
6.5
0.0915
0.9085
10.8955
264.65
9.15
7.25
-1.17
700
92
7.0
0.0986
0.9014
10.9806
265.48
9.86
7.19
-1.23
750
93
7.5
0.1056
0.8944
11.0671
266.27
10.56
7.16
-1.26
800
95
8.0
0.1127
0.8873
11.1549
269.85
11.27
7.15
-1.27
850
96
8.5
0.1197
0.8803
11.2441
270.53
11.97
7.05
-1.37
900
97
9.0
0.1268
0.8732
11.3348
271.16
12.68
6.95
-1.47
1000
98.5
10.0
0.1408
0.8592
11.5206
270.91
14.08
0.000
0.028
0.270
0.313
0.327
0.427
0.455
0.455
0.484
0.598
0.740
0.854
0.882
0.882
0.911
1.636
1.665
1.750
1.793
1.807
1.949
2.092
TRIAXIAL TEST
Consolidated Drained Test ( CD )
49
Sample data : dia. = 3.6 cm ,
Loading rate
length = 7.2 cm ,
= 0.3 mm/min.
Volume
Volume
Def.
Load
dalta
Unit
Area
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
change
change
Reading
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
Area
Stress
Strain
dv/v
(cm3)
(cm3)
(div)
(div)
(mm)
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
(%)
7.38
0.0
0.0000
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
0.000
7.35
-0.03
20
25
0.2
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
79.81
0.28
-0.043
7.2
-0.18
40
50
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
159.16
0.56
-0.256
7.1
-0.28
60
63
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
199.98
0.85
-0.398
7.02
-0.36
80
73
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
231.06
1.13
-0.512
6.92
-0.46
100
82
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
258.81
1.41
-0.655
6.84
-0.54
120
88
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
276.95
1.69
-0.768
6.72
-0.66
140
96
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
301.26
1.97
-0.939
6.64
-0.74
160
100
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
312.91
2.25
-1.053
6.6
-0.78
180
104
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
324.49
2.54
-1.110
6.5
-0.88
200
108
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
336.00
2.82
-1.252
6.4
-0.98
250
117
2.5
0.0352
0.9648
10.2592
361.36
3.52
-1.394
6.22
-1.16
300
123
3.0
0.0423
0.9577
10.3347
377.12
4.23
-1.651
6.1
-1.28
350
129
3.5
0.0493
0.9507
10.4112
392.61
4.93
-1.821
-1.38
400
134
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
404.80
5.63
-1.964
5.9
-1.48
450
139
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
416.78
6.34
-2.106
5.82
-1.56
500
143
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
425.55
7.04
-2.220
5.7
-1.68
550
147
5.5
0.0775
0.9225
10.7291
434.13
7.75
-2.390
5.66
-1.72
600
149
6.0
0.0845
0.9155
10.8117
436.68
8.45
-2.447
5.62
-1.76
650
151
6.5
0.0915
0.9085
10.8955
439.14
9.15
-2.504
5.52
-1.86
700
154
7.0
0.0986
0.9014
10.9806
444.39
9.86
-2.647
5.48
-1.9
750
155
7.5
0.1056
0.8944
11.0671
443.78
10.56
-2.703
5.44
-1.94
800
157
8.0
0.1127
0.8873
11.1549
445.97
11.27
-2.760
5.24
-2.14
900
161
9.0
0.1268
0.8732
11.3348
450.07
12.68
-3.045
5.24
-2.14
1000
165
10.0
0.1408
0.8592
11.5206
453.82
14.08
-3.045
5.24
-2.14
1100
169
11.0
0.1549
0.8451
11.7126
457.20
15.49
-3.045
TRIAXIAL TEST
Consolidated Drained Test ( CD )
Sample data : dia. = 3.6 cm , length = 7.1 cm ,
50
Loading rate
= 0.3 mm/min.
Volume
Volume
Def.
Load
dalta
Unit
Area
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
change
change
Reading
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
Area
Stress
Strain
dv/v
(cm3)
(cm3)
(div)
(div)
(mm)
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
(%)
3.9
0.00
0.0
0.0000
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
-0.10
20
27
0.2
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
86.19
0.28
4.1
-0.20
40
64
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
203.73
0.56
4.2
-0.30
60
83
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
263.46
0.85
4.4
-0.50
80
96
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
303.86
1.13
4.42
-0.52
100
105
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
331.40
1.41
4.6
-0.70
120
114
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
358.78
1.69
4.64
-0.74
140
122
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
382.86
1.97
4.8
-0.90
160
128
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
400.53
2.25
4.82
-0.92
180
134
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
418.10
2.54
4.82
-0.92
200
137
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
426.22
2.82
5.2
-1.30
250
147
2.5
0.0352
0.9648
10.2592
454.02
3.52
5.24
-1.34
300
158
3.0
0.0423
0.9577
10.3347
484.43
4.23
5.32
-1.42
350
166
3.5
0.0493
0.9507
10.4112
505.22
4.93
5.44
-1.54
400
177
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
534.70
5.63
5.5
-1.60
450
184
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
551.70
6.34
5.56
-1.66
500
191
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
568.39
7.04
5.7
-1.80
600
202
6.0
0.0845
0.9155
10.8117
592.01
8.45
5.8
-1.90
700
208
7.0
0.0986
0.9014
10.9806
600.22
9.86
5.9
-2.00
800
212
8.0
0.1127
0.8873
11.1549
602.20
11.27
-2.10
900
215
9.0
0.1268
0.8732
11.3348
601.03
12.68
6.4
-2.50
1100
234
11.0
0.1549
0.8451
11.7126
633.04
15.49
0.000
0.142
0.285
0.427
0.711
0.740
0.996
1.053
1.281
1.309
1.309
1.850
1.907
2.020
2.191
2.277
2.362
2.561
2.703
2.846
2.988
3.557
TRIAXIAL TEST
Consolidated Undrained Test ( CU )
51
= 0.3 mm/min.
Pore
water
Def.
dalta
Unit
Area
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
pressure
pressure
Reading
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
Area
Stress
Strain
(div)
(kPa)
(div)
(div)
(mm)
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
0.0
0.0000
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
0.5
20
12
0.2
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
38.31
0.28
15
5.5
40
33
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
105.05
0.56
22
60
45
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
142.84
0.85
26
11
80
55
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
174.09
1.13
33
14.5
100
59
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
186.22
1.41
37
16.5
120
62
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
195.12
1.69
42
19
140
65
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
203.98
1.97
45
20.5
160
66
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
206.52
2.25
47
21.5
180
67
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
209.05
2.54
49
22.5
200
69
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
214.67
2.82
52
24
220
70
2.2
0.0310
0.9690
10.2145
217.15
3.10
54
25
240
70
2.4
0.0338
0.9662
10.2443
216.51
3.38
56
26
260
70
2.6
0.0366
0.9634
10.2742
215.88
3.66
56
26
280
70
2.8
0.0394
0.9606
10.3044
215.25
3.94
57
60
26.5
28
300
350
70
70
3.0
3.5
0.0423
0.0493
0.9577
0.9507
10.3347
10.4112
214.62
213.04
4.23
4.93
63
29.5
400
70
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
211.47
5.63
66
31
450
70
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
209.89
6.34
68
32
500
69
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
205.33
7.04
74
35
550
69
5.5
0.0775
0.9225
10.7291
203.78
7.75
76
36
600
69
6.0
0.0845
0.9155
10.8117
202.22
8.45
78
37
650
69
6.5
0.0915
0.9085
10.8955
200.67
9.15
79
37.5
700
68
7.0
0.0986
0.9014
10.9806
196.23
9.86
TRIAXIAL TEST
Consolidated Undrained Test ( CU )
Sample data : dia. = 3.6 cm ,
length = 7.2 cm ,
52
Loading rate
Pore
water
= 0.3 mm/min.
Pore
water
Def.
dalta
Unit
Area
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
pressure
pressure
Reading
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
Area
Stress
Strain
(div)
(kPa)
(div)
(div)
(mm)
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
0.0
0.0000
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
10
0.1
0.0014
0.9986
9.9120
12.79
0.14
0.5
20
10
0.2
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
31.92
0.28
30
12
0.3
0.0042
0.9958
9.9400
38.25
0.42
40
15
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
47.75
0.56
2.5
50
45
0.5
0.0070
0.9930
9.9682
143.04
0.70
60
60
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
190.45
0.85
13
6.5
70
72
0.7
0.0099
0.9901
9.9966
228.22
0.99
16
80
81
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
256.38
1.13
19
9.5
90
88
0.9
0.0127
0.9873
10.0251
278.14
1.27
20
10
100
93
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
293.53
1.41
26
13
120
102
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
321.01
1.69
32
16
140
109
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
342.06
1.97
35
17.5
160
114
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
356.72
2.25
38
19
180
118
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
368.17
2.54
43
21.5
200
121
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
376.44
2.82
45
22.5
220
123
2.2
0.0310
0.9690
10.2145
381.56
3.10
49
24.5
240
125
2.4
0.0338
0.9662
10.2443
386.63
3.38
50
25
260
127
2.6
0.0366
0.9634
10.2742
391.67
3.66
52
26
280
128
2.8
0.0394
0.9606
10.3044
393.60
3.94
55
27.5
300
130
3.0
0.0423
0.9577
10.3347
398.58
4.23
59
29.5
350
132
3.5
0.0493
0.9507
10.4112
401.74
4.93
65
32.5
400
135
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
407.83
5.63
68
34
450
137
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
410.78
6.34
75
37.5
500
139
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
413.64
7.04
78
39
550
141
5.5
0.0775
0.9225
10.7291
416.41
7.75
80
40
600
143
6.0
0.0845
0.9155
10.8117
419.10
8.45
84
42
650
144
6.5
0.0915
0.9085
10.8955
418.78
9.15
TRIAXIAL TEST
Consolidated Undrained Test ( CU )
Sample data : dia. = 3.6 cm ,
Loading rate
= 0.3 mm/min.
length = 7.2 cm ,
53
Pore
water
Pore
water
Def.
Load
dalta
Unit
Area
Corr.
Deviator
Axial
pressure
pressure
Reading
Reading
Strain
Corr.factor
Area
Stress
Strain
(div)
(kPa)
(div)
(div)
(mm)
( cm2)
( kPa)
(%)
0.0
0.0000
1.0000
9.8980
0.00
0.00
10
0.1
0.0014
0.9986
9.9120
25.57
0.14
20
15
0.2
0.0028
0.9972
9.9260
47.88
0.28
30
22
0.3
0.0042
0.9958
9.9400
70.13
0.42
0.5
40
30
0.4
0.0056
0.9944
9.9541
95.50
0.56
1.5
50
48
0.5
0.0070
0.9930
9.9682
152.58
0.70
13
60
70
0.6
0.0085
0.9915
9.9824
222.20
0.85
16
5.5
70
92
0.7
0.0099
0.9901
9.9966
291.61
0.99
20
7.5
80
108
0.8
0.0113
0.9887
10.0108
341.84
1.13
22
8.5
90
120
0.9
0.0127
0.9873
10.0251
379.28
1.27
25
10
100
128
1.0
0.0141
0.9859
10.0394
403.99
1.41
32
13.5
120
142
1.2
0.0169
0.9831
10.0682
446.90
1.69
36
15.5
140
152
1.4
0.0197
0.9803
10.0971
477.00
1.97
42
18.5
160
160
1.6
0.0225
0.9775
10.1262
500.66
2.25
49
22
180
167
1.8
0.0254
0.9746
10.1555
521.06
2.54
52
23.5
200
173
2.0
0.0282
0.9718
10.1849
538.22
2.82
55
25
220
177
2.2
0.0310
0.9690
10.2145
549.07
3.10
59
27
240
181
2.4
0.0338
0.9662
10.2443
559.85
3.38
63
29
260
185
2.6
0.0366
0.9634
10.2742
570.55
3.66
66
30.5
280
188
2.8
0.0394
0.9606
10.3044
578.11
3.94
69
32
300
191
3.0
0.0423
0.9577
10.3347
585.61
4.23
81
38
350
197
3.5
0.0493
0.9507
10.4112
599.56
4.93
86
40.5
400
202
4.0
0.0563
0.9437
10.4889
610.23
5.63
95
45
450
206
4.5
0.0634
0.9366
10.5678
617.67
6.34
104
49.5
500
210
5.0
0.0704
0.9296
10.6478
624.93
7.04
114
54.5
550
212
5.5
0.0775
0.9225
10.7291
626.10
7.75
121
58
600
214
6.0
0.0845
0.9155
10.8117
627.18
8.45
125
60
650
216
6.5
0.0915
0.9085
10.8955
628.17
9.15
128
61.5
700
218
7.0
0.0986
0.9014
10.9806
629.07
9.86
133
64
750
220
7.5
0.1056
0.8944
11.0671
629.89
10.56
136
65.5
800
221.5
8.0
0.1127
0.8873
11.1549
629.19
11.27
139
67
850
224
8.5
0.1197
0.8803
11.2441
631.24
11.97
145
70
900
226
9.0
0.1268
0.8732
11.3348
631.78
12.68
146
70.5
950
228
9.5
0.1338
0.8662
11.4270
632.23
13.38
REFERENCES
1)
Bishop A.W. and Henkel, D.J. (1962). The measurement of soil properties in the
triaxial test, Edward Arnold Ltd, London, 2nd Ed. 227P.
54
2)
Bishop A.W., and Eldin, A.K.G, 1950. Undrained triaxial tests on saturated sands
and their significance in the general theory of shear strength, Geotechnique, 2: 1332.
3)
4)
Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B., 1967. Soil mechanics in engineering practice, John
Wiley and Sons, New York, 2nd Ed. 729P.
5)
6)
Head, K.H. 1986. Manual of soil laboratory testing, volume 3 effective stress tests,
Halsted Press, New York, 1240 pp.
7)