Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4
6
8
Interest Rate (rc)%
[125]
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
126
d)
100
>\,
(1 I rJlOOf
I
Load factor /
(%)
(Sinking Fund)
..
10
0-8
Power factor at
peak load
10
0-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
00
0-6
04
0-2
00
0 055
0-107
0-148
0-177
0 194
0-200
0000
0000
0-000
0000
0-000
0-000
Load loss-factor c
1-000
1-000
1-000
1-000
1-000
1-000
0-660
0-710
0-750
0-778
0-794
0-800
0-400
0-472
0-528
0-568
0-592
0-600
0 195
0-269
0-326
0-367
0-392
0-400
10
15
20
25
30
40
3"o
31/
5%
4"o
6%
7%
Percentage annual depreciation rate (r(i) for zero salvage value after
n years
9-13
5-78
4-12
3-12
2-46
1-66
8-93
5-58
3-91
2-93
2-28
1-48
8-72
5-38
3-72
2-74
2-10
1-33
8-52
5-18
3-54
2-57
1-94
1-18
8-33
4-99
3-36
2-40
1-78
105
8-14
4-81
319
2-24
1-64
0-93
7-95
4-63
3-02
2-09
1-50
0-83
7-59
4-30
2-72
1-82
1-26
0-65
7-24
3-98
2-44
1-58
1-06
0-50
Percentage annual depreciation rate (r,,) for 10% salvage value after
i
j years
10
15
20
25
30
40
8-22
5-20
3-71
2-81
2-22
1-49
8-04
5-02
3-52
2-64
2-06
1-33
7-85
4-84
3-35
2-47
1-89
1-20
7-67
4-66
3-19
2-31
1-75
106
7-50
4-49
3-02
216
1-60
0-94
7-33
4-33
2-87
2-02
1-48
0-84
7-16
4-17
2-72
1-88
1-35
0-75
6-84
3-87
2-45
1-64
114
0-58
6-52
3-58
2-20
1-42
0-96
0-45
-'- 36-5yq)
(5)
04
00
Load Factor I
0-8
10
(8)
.
(9>
In the same way, expression (2) for the investment cost of the
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
C, - C -f- Q. = C +
iKi + WCKC)
(10)
127
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
128
200
200
Transformer
100 kVA_
11 kV
3-phase
50C/S
50
100
Iron Loss
Fig. 3.Transformer prices for various loss values.
Transformer IOOkVA.llkV
3-phajse, 50c/$
160
Fig. 5.Transformer prices for various loss ratios and iron-loss values.
(Transformer Price C)
100%126 5
42
Transformer
100 kVA, UkV. 3-phase,50c/s
0
150%
100
Iron Lo&s Wt
Fig. 4.Transformer prices for various loss ratios and iron-loss values.
50
50
100
Iron Loss ?%
Fig. 6.Annual operating cost of transformer.
150
one feature in common, a double minimum, namely one minimum operating cost for each curve drawn for a constant loss ratio
or transformer price, and among these minima a specific minimum corresponding to one definite loss ratio or price. This last
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
5/kW
0-4d./KWh
09
0535
0322
6% pa.
Iron Loss
Fig. 7. -Annual operating cost of transformer.
129
f^A
V Wj/Opt
P + 36-5^
u2(p + 36-5zyq)
Thus only the curve in Fig. 5 for the above ratio is needed for
calculating the corresponding curve in Fig. 8, this last curve being
the lowest and its minimum giving the solution required. Without the information embodied in Fig. 5, the trial-and-error
method must be used, with the aid of the second rule. For a
tentative design with the desired loss ratio, the annual capital
cost should be compared with the cost of the losses. If the
ratio of these two costs does not correspond
to that required by the second rule, at least
Transformer 100 kVA. 11 kV, 3-phase, 50 c/s.
an obvious indication will be obtained of what
p-5/kW 9=0-4d./kWh y-1 w-0 9
modifications in design are necessary to
#
Loss Ratio approach the requirements of the most economic design.
Wc:Wi
No conclusions can be drawn from Figs. 6, 7
and 8 on the rate of increase of the annual
operating cost on a deviation of the price of
the transformer, and the loss ratio, etc., from
their optimum values. This rate of increase
will depend largely on the values of the constants R, p, q, y, u, I, z, whereas the shape of
the different curves in Figs. 6, 7 and 8
obviously depends on the scales used in
plotting them.
An important point to note in connection
with the above analysis is that in function (12)
and in Figs. 3, 4 and 5 representing this function, the price and the loss variations have
been assumed as being due only to dimensional
changes in designs; no such factors as the use
of different materials (aluminium in place of
copper, or different grades of steel, etc.), or
different manufacturing and overall costs have
been taken into account. Hence, the minimum
value of the transformer operating cost
applies for the price variations as given, e.g.,
200
100
125
175
150
by the data in Fig. 5. If different materials
Transformer Price
can be used in construction or the manufaccx
turing and overall costs can be modified, a
Fig. 8.Annual operating cost of transformer.]
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
130
different solution may be found for the most economic transformer design; this must be checked by using data suitably
modified from those in Fig. 5, and proceeding as before.
In the example analysed in Figs. 3-8, the point corresponding
to the most economic transformer design is indicated by K on
all curves, while the point S corresponds to the standard design
for the given case, i.e. to 100% price and loss values, and a
3 1 loss ratio. Reference lines drawn at the bottom of Fig. 5
allow the total loss figures for different designs to be read off,
and thus the corresponding efficiencies to be calculated.
(6) INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS CONSTANTS
For a given relationship between the initial transformer cost
and its losses, e.g. of the type represented by the curves of
Figs. 3, 4 or 5, the most economic choice of a transformer, as
represented by Figs. 6-8, can be made only if the coefficients
R, p, q, y, u, I, z, are assumed constant. It will therefore be instructive to examine, at least qualitatively, how variations in the
values of these coefficients will affect economic selection for a
given price/loss relationship for the transformer.
With other values unchanged, an increase in the total rate of
the capital charges R, i.e. an increase in the interest rate and/or a
decrease in the assumed life of the transformer, will displace the
optimum point K in Figs. 6-8 towards the comparatively cheaper
transformer designs, i.e. towards those having higher losses; this
results from the requirement that there shall be a definite ratio
between the annual capital charges and the cost of the losses.
The same requirement shifts the economic choice of a transformer
towards cheaper designs also with decreases in the power tariff
(factors p and q): in the time the transformer is excited during
the year (>); in the load factor / and therefore in the load lossfactor z; and in the ratio u of the actual peak load to the transformer rating. The changes in the values of /, z, it, besides
affecting the economic selection of specific total losses and of
the transformer price related with this figure, also influence the
choice of the most economic ratio of copper to iron losses. With
each of these constants equal to unity, the kW loss figures for
iron and for copper should be equal; if the values of /, z, u
decrease, the copper loss must become greater than the iron loss
so as always to fulfil the condition of equality between the annual
costs of the two types of loss.
With the loss ratio determined by /, z and w, as well as by
p and q, the total loss is proportional to the iron loss. The value
of the latter at which the annual operating cost is an optimum,
i.e. for the point K in Figs. 6 and 7, will depend on the ratio of the
interest charged on capital R to the power tariff: the higher this
ratio, the higher the iron-loss figure for the optimum design of
transformer.
In view of the wide range of numerical values which the factors
R, P, q, X, it, I, z, can assume in practice, and with the price/loss
relationship depending on the transformer type and size, as well
as on the transformer manufacturer and on general economic
conditions, such as the costs of raw materials and of labour, etc.,
it is neither practicable nor possible to establish a numerical relationship between the most economical loss value and the ratio
^/(P* <?) For a given price/loss relationship, the above dependence could theoretically be represented diagrammatically
in the manner shown in Fig. 9.
(7) CURRENT PRACTICE OF TRANSFORMER USERS FOR
CAPITALIZATION OF LOSSES
For the capitalization of losses, transformer users in this
country and abroad mostly favour equation (7) for calculating
the annual cost of operating.
In 10 cases out of the 25 examined, the three coefficients in
equation (7) were given directly. The coefficients of equation (10)
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
131
wide limits, but the data for their determination are as a rule (10) BOGH, A.: "Valuation of Annual Losses of Conveiter and
easily obtainable. The following approximate values of the
Traasformer Stations by Means of Load Curves," World
constants of equation (7) are suggested for estimating purposes,
Power Conference, 1930, Paper No. 331.
these applying to current conditions in this country:
(11) BOLTON, D. J.: "The Economic Rating of Motors and Trans(a) For large transformers in power stations and main subformers," Journal I.E.E., 1944, 91, Part II, p. 195.
stations :
ca 0 08C } 10 Wi I - 4 8 Wc
. . per annum (14)
(10) APPENDICES
with (approximately) p 3 per kW, q 0-2d./kWh, y = 1,
(10.1) Valuation of Copper Losses
it
0-9, I
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(Referring to Section 3)
When the load on a transformer (or on any other electrical
equipment having copper losses) varies over a period 7", e.g. in
the manner shown in Fig. 10A, the total copper losses during this
period can be expressed as:
Lc = zwcpT kWh
(18)
where wcp is the copper loss in kW corresponding to the peak N.p
of the variable load, and z is the "load loss-factor." The value
of this factor is defined from the above as:
wctdt
ifdt
N?dt
(19)
1JT or
wcpT or
cp
where wct, f,, N,, are the instantaneous values at a time / of the
copper loss, the current and the load respectively, and Jp is the
current at peak load.
When the actual load curve is known, e.g. as in Fig. 10A, the
load loss-factor z can always be evaluated by drawing the curve
of the squares of the loads (Fig. 10B) and calculating the ratio of
Time
T 8760 hr O
t
Time
T
(9) BIBLIOGRAPHY
LENARD, P.: " L'evaluation et la capitalisation des pertes
Fig. 1 0 A
Fig. 10B
dans les transformateurs," International Conference on
Large High-Tension Electric Systems, 1937,1, Paper 101. the surface under the curve to the surface of the rectangle Np2T.
WOI.F, M.: "Die Berechnung der elektrischen Verluste bei This is correct only with a constant power factor throughout the
schwankenden Lastverhaltnissen in Netzen und Energie- period of load changes; otherwise a kVA or a current curve must
wandlern auf Grund von Erfahrungswerten," Elektro- be used in place of the kW load curve.
technische Zeitschrift, 1931, 52, p. 1267; 1932, 53, p. 1005. In most practical cases, either the actual or the anticipated load
VIDMAR, M.: "Der wirtschaftliche Aufbau des Transforma- curves are not available, or the method indicated for determining
tors," Elektrotechnik und Maschinenbau, 1933, 51, p. 69. the load loss-factor is considered too laborious. The load is then
VIDMAR, M.: "Le probleme economique dans la con- characterized by its load factor / only, this being the ratio of the
struction des transformateurs," Comptes rendus du actual power consumption (kWh) during the period T to the
congres international d'electricite, Paris, 1932, 5, p. 977. product of the peak load and the period T:
THIESSEN, W.: "Berechnung und Bewertung von UmspanT
nerverlusten," Elektrizitdtswirtschaft, 1935, 34, p. 765.
N,dt
SANDOR, L.: "Calculation of capitalization of transformer
(20)
1
=
losses," Elektrotechnika, 1941, 34, pp. 19, 26 (in HunNpT
garian).
In other words / is the ratio of the mean load during the period
BOLTON, D. J.: "Electrical Engineering Economics,"2nd ed.,
T to the peak load Np.
1936, chap. 9 (Chapman and Hall, Ltd.).
For calculating the copper losses a relation must be established
REED, E. G.: "The Essentials of Transformer Practice,"
between the load loss-factor z and the load factor /. For a given
2nd ed., 1927, chaps. 23-25 (Chapman and Hall, Ltd.).
WILD, E. E.: "Transformers," 1940, chap. 9, pp. 7-10 value of/, z can assume different values between the two extremes
of zmax = / and zm,-n I2, depending on the shape of the load
(Blackie and Sons, Ltd.).
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
132
the duration of the load and its peak value, and z' the annual
load loss-factor for the copper watt-loss at the rated load.
The load factor / as used for the evaluation of transformer
losses must always be determined for the load on the transformer
itself, for there may be a great difference between the load factor
of the whole system and that of any individual transformer.
(10.2) Underrunning as a Means for the Economic Selection of
Transformers
(Referring to Section 5)
Usually the price variations for a transformer with iron and
copper losses varying independently over a sufficiently wide
Load factor /
1 0
0 9
0- 8
0- 7
0 6
0 5
0 4
0- 3
0- 2
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 815
0- 66
0- 525
0 40
0 29
0 195
0- 115
0- 055
0 02
0 0
The factor /, and hence also the factor z in the above table,
are deduced from kW loads; as a result these values of z can be
used only when the power factor of the load remains constant
during the period of load variations. This does not hold in
most practical cases, so that it becomes advisable to simulate
actual conditions more closely, namely by assuming that under
a varying load the reactive component of the load remains constant. The values of z, depending on the power factor during
the peak load, are then those given in the table in Section 3 and
in Fig. 2 (these values are also taken from Wolf's paper). It
should be noted that when the power factor is constant throughout load variations, values of z must be taken corresponding to
unity power factor at peak load in Fig. 2 and in the Table in
Section 3.
Incidentally, the load loss-factor z is equal to the square of the
product of the load factor / and the form factor / of the loadcurve,/being the ratio of the r.m.s. value of the load curve (NB)
to its mean value (NM)'>
z = l2/2
(21)
This can be proved by a further transformation of equation
(19), thus:
T
N2dt
=
^o
NT
-Nj^
N
_
^Np'J
^NMy
The load loss-factor z can hence also be obtained from empirical data interrelating / and /.
Sometimes empirical formulae are used giving the relationship
between z and /, e.g. the following expression:
z = 0-2/ +0-8/2
(22)
The results obtained may be close enough to the empirical figures
quoted above, provided the power factor can be assumed constant. Otherwise, better results will be obtained by using the
values of z in the Table in Section 3.
The factors / and z always refer to the actual duration T of
the load and to its peak value Np. When calculating the copper
losses, it is usual to extend the calculation over a period of one
year (8 760 hours) and to use the copper watt-loss Wc corresponding to the nominal rating P of the transformer, thus:
T = 8 760^ hours
. . . . .
(23)
(24)
NP uP kilowatts
(25)
Whence
wcp = u2Wc
giving the copper losses as:
Lc = 8 160zu2Wcy = 8 76Oz'Wc . . kWh (26)
where z' = zu2y, z being the actual load loss-factor referred to
range, are not easy to obtain. The selection of the most economic transformer is then partly possible by considering a series
of transformers of similar design but of different ratings. The
transformers in a series usually have a constant copper/iron
loss ratio, at least over a narrow range about the kVA figure for
which the transformer is to be chosen. The prices for a standard
series of transformers can be easily obtained. The object of the
present method is to reduce the losses in a transformer by using
a design from the standard series, but with a rating higher than
normally corresponding to the anticipated maximum load.
If the working load is N{ kVA, the direct choice of a transformer from the standard series would give a rating Pl N{ kVA,
with full-load copper loss of Wcl and iron loss of Wix kW.
Assume that a higher rating is selected, namely P2 = */>, kVA;
its full-load losses will be Wc2 and Wi2 respectively. Owing to
similarity in design, the loss ratio will be the same in the two
cases, thus:
Wcl/Wn = Wc2/Wi2 = constant . . . (27)
The transformer of rating P2 will have to work only on a maximum load of N1 kVA, i.e.
N^Pi^PJx
(28)
(3D
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
K2lW;2={\ln).{WclIWi2)
= {\lnXWcXIWi{).
133
<C
250
. (32)
then
m2lx2~]/n or x = m. \/n
. . . (33)
For every value of the coefficient n chosen, different, interrelated values of m and x are possible.
The practical application of this method will be illustrated by
an example. Fig. 11 gives prices, efficiencies, and iron and
200
250
97 - "
Standard Transformers
3-phage. 50c/s
II kV
H.:ty-31-constan1
Wc
200
08
05
Fig. 12
Wi
150
100
200
kVA
Fig. 11
300
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
134
A
w /
or
,-i-i
^o
(36)
i.e. the total annual cost of the losses ought to be equal to s/t
times the annual capital charges.
M. Vidmar (Reference 3) assumes an increase of r times
in all the linear dimensions of a transformer as a means of
design change, and further that such increase will raise the price
of the transformer in proportion to the third power of r (i.e. s = 3),
whereas the losses will decrease inversely with r (i.e. / = 1).
Therefore s\t 3. Actually Vidmar's assumption of the increase in transformer cost is exaggerated through not taking into
account all the dimensions depending only on the voltage rating,
and all the supplementary items of approximately constant cost.
A value of s between 2 and 2-5 would seem to be more correct.
Evidence of this can be found by making use of the method of
underrunning transformers as described in Section 10.2.
Taking r as the coefficient of increase of transformer rating
in comparison with the standard rating, corresponding to the
load, when underrunning the transformer, the prices for the
standard series shown in Fig. 11 increase as /*, i.e. s = \,
whereas for diminution of the losses it is easily found that / lies
between and | . In Fig. 13, curve 1 gives the total losses for
the different kVA ratings of the standard series of transformers
in the example taken. Curve 2 gives the losses when underrunning r times the transformers with the nominal load of 100kVA;
by a suitable change in the number of turns the losses are reduced
to W\r. Curves 3 and 4 are also shown; these pass through the
point r --= 1, Wlr = 1VU for Nt = 100 kVA, and satisfy the relations Wfr ~ WJr'< and W/r = WJr} respectively, thus showing that the value of / does lie between i and | . .
The values of the coefficients s and / determining the law of
variation of transformer cost and losses will be different for
different transformer designs and makes, and in a strict analysis
they ought to be specially determined for each case. The ratio
sit, however, will not vary very much, and for all practical purposes it can be safely taken as between 2 and 2-5; in the above
example, with s = i and t -= 1/4-5, it is 2-25.
t
\
1OO
200
300 kVA
Fig. 13
Additional evidence can be provided by considering a particular series of standard transformers of 50, 75, 100, 150
and 200 kVA, in which the weights of active materials are
540, 700, 890, 1160 and 13601b, i.e. the weights increase
as 1 : 1-3 : 1-65 : 2-15 : 2-52. The increase in linear dimensions would be the cube root of these values, namely
1 : 109 : 1-18 : 1-29 : 1-36. Pre-war prices were 93, 110,
126, 163 and 190, i.e. they increased in the proportion
1 : 1 18 : 1 36 : 1 75 : 2-05. Taking the increase of the linear
dimensions as / times, and the price increase as rs times,
values of s are 1 8, 1 85, 2- 2, 2- 34. The total losses are 1 56,
2-12, 2-64, 3-56, 4 50 kW, i.e. they are in a proportion
of 1 : 1-36 : 1-69 : 2-28 : 2-88. When underrunning the
transformers these losses will change in the proportion
50/50 : 50/75 : 50/100 : 50/150 : 50/200; they will then be as
1 : 0-9 :0-82 :0-76 :0-72; if this is to be defined by
i--', t will be 1-2,
1-2,
109,
s/t
annual cost of thefixedloss, and the other is that the total annual
cost of losses should be about 2-5 times the total capital charges
on the transformer. These two points should considerably
simplify the consideration of transformer tender prices. There
Authorized licensed use limited to: MADHAV INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE. Downloaded on June 21,2010 at 07:57:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.