Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bryan Attewell
21/02/2008
Ahmed Elmarakbi
07/07/2008
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Choosing an Individual Project
1. INTRODUCTION
The final year project might be considered the most important module on the
programme, it is certainly the largest, at 40 credits, in terms of its contribution to your
degree classification. The project is normally the last module to be tackled, which
means that you are able to bring to bear all of the knowledge and skills that you have
accumulated during the course.
Let's get this into perspective however, it is an undergraduate project, not a doctoral
thesis. We want to see a problem competently solved and reported. The project does not
have to include the development of new theories or great originality, rather the correct
application of known procedures to an engineering problem. Most students enjoy their
final project, it is an opportunity to pursue an investigation into an area in which they
have a personal interest.
The project will include a number of key elements.
1. First there will be the identification of a problem and the negotiation of a project
brief with your supervisor.
2. You will be expected to conduct research into the subject of your project. This can
take many forms, e.g. patent search, literature survey, contacts with suppliers,
customers and colleagues.
3. You will write and submit an interim report.
4. You should then set about solving the problem that you have been faced with. It is
necessary that the project contains at least one of the following elements:4.1. A design study resulting in a set of engineering drawings and supporting
calculations.
4.2. Experimental work where a test rig is designed and made, experiments carried
out, and the results analysed and reported.
4.3. A manufacturing problem is identified and a system is designed and put in
place to eliminate the problem.
5. While all projects should contain some element of a literature review, projects that
confine themselves to that activity are not acceptable.
6. Your project will be reported by means of a written report.
7. You will attend a viva (or question session) with two members of academic staff.
Students vary in their level of ambition and ability. Those aspiring to a first class
honours degree would need to ensure that the project is sufficiently demanding to allow
them to display their ability to the full. A student who can perhaps only devote a limited
amount of time to study and who will be satisfied with a lower grade might chose
something less ambitious.
Industrially based students have available to them very large resources compared to
students who are not in work. In particular they are able to ask suppliers for
information about their products, or even request that they carry out part of the work of
the project. It is necessary to strike a balance here, in the real world most engineering
projects involve contributions from many sources, and you will probably need to obtain
information from suppliers. It is not acceptable, however, to undertake a project that
merely involves the obtaining of tenders and the organisation of the work. It is essential
that your project shows that you have been involved in engineering the details of the
process. You should size the motors, and calculate the stresses etc., you should not rely
on a supplier to do this for you. The final grade awarded will take into account any
external assistance that you may have had.
There may be conflicts of interest between the needs of your company and the
academic requirements of the project. It is better to choose a project that is not of
critical importance to the firm's future, as such a project would probably be taken out of
your hands if things started to go wrong, while the timing of the academic project
might not fit with the company's requirements. The best projects are perhaps those that
the firm would like to carry out, but have been sidelined by more pressing issues.
You will be required to negotiate your project title and content with your academic
supervisor. We hope that you will undertake a project that is of interest, and will make
every effort to allocate supervisory staff that have the necessary expertise.
The idea for the individual project may be a proposal from a member of staff or your
own, or perhaps a combination of the two.
Staff Proposals
For projects proposed by members of university academic staff you should discuss the
project with the proposer so that you have ample of time to think about the best choices
for you. Please note that not every project is appropriate for every student: some may
only suit students with a very specific set of interests. Each project proposal will have a
brief outline in order to help you to make an informed choice.
Own Proposals
If you have your own idea for an individual project it is your responsibility to find a
member of university academic staff who is willing to supervise it. The module leader
will be happy to help you find a supervisor but you should not assume that one can be
allocated in every case.
The individual projects offered by members of staff may well vary significantly in
breadth, depth and degree of complexity. The vital thing is to select a set of projects
(preferred project and two others) that are right for you. Some students are better
advised to attempt harder, riskier projects that require a high degree of original input
and technical problem solving. Other students are better suited to clear, well-defined
and comparatively safe projects that provide scope for demonstrating proficiency with a
low risk of failure.
If you are ambitious and would like to achieve high marks in your project, you should
choose your set of projects with particular care. The potential supervisors will be more
than happy to offer advice on the appropriateness of a project, given your academic
background, strengths, weakness, motivations and ambitions. Please keep in mind that
it is essential to balance realism and ambition when making a choice.
Please note that if you choose from the projects offered by members of staff your first
choice of project might not be guaranteed since supervisors can only take responsibility
for a limited number of individual projects. In some cases, you will be allocated one of
your other choices.
Typical project titles might include:
The design of a mechanism to operate a high speed weaving machine.
A review of the energy requirements of a company and the implementation of a system
of process monitoring and adjustment to optimise energy consumption.
The design of a computer controlled machine to bend brake and other pipes for the
automotive industry.
The specification and implementation of a control system for an industrial process.
The application of statistical process control to the manufacture of a company's
product.
The specification and design of a variable speed drive system for an industrial process.
The use of Taguchi techniques in an experimental investigation into the problems
associated with the manufacture of injection moulded components.
The application of a solid state control system to a domestic product.
The automation of a production line.
Etc.
Please note that all of these titles involve the solution of a real engineering problem.
The interim report should describe the progress to date and indicate the next stages of
the work. It should include a Gantt Chart showing how you plan to continue with the
work. (See Appendix 3 - Sample Gantt Chart).
The interim report should not exceed 2000 words in length, and a word count should be
appended.
You should submit two copies of your intermediate report, one to your academic
supervisor and one to the module team. Your academic supervisor will comment on the
content of the interim report and may require that you carry out further work and resubmit the report before proceeding with the project. That could happen, for example, if
there was insufficient evidence of background research. Like the project brief, this part
of the assessment is pass/fail, it does not contribute to your final grade. You must obtain
the approval of your academic supervisor before proceeding with the project. It is
recommended that the interim report be submitted 12 weeks after you have registered
on the project module.
attendance is not essential. In any event the work supervisor may be asked to comment
upon your work throughout the year.
In the case of centre based or independent off campus students the viva may be
undertaken by video conferencing subject to the technical quality of the transmission
being of an appropriate standard. It is expected that independent students will make
their own arrangements and pay for any hire and connection charges involved.
You will be asked to briefly describe the work that you have undertaken, and then you
will be asked a number of questions relating to it. It will not be necessary to prepare a
formal presentation, you are not being marked on presentation skills. There will not be
facilities available for overhead projection or computer based presentation.
If you have constructed a portable product, e.g. an electronic circuit, you may bring that
to the viva to demonstrate its operation. In that case you must make arrangements well
in advance of the viva to ensure that any necessary ancillary equipment, power supplies
etc, is available.
The duration of the viva will be about 20 minutes.
10
problems encountered and their solutions, setbacks, lessons learned, involvement of the
project sponsor if applicable and his/her reaction to the project, an exposition on how
the deliverables satisfy the objectives, how it was established that the deliverables meet
the objectives.
Success
The quality of the end product is clearly important. Success can only be evaluated
effectively if measures have been identified to allow an objective assessment - giving
some notation of "proof", rather than reliance on opinion or anecdotal evidence.
Success in the project should always be argued for in terms of mapping back to the
objectives identified in the terms of reference.
Control (Supervisor only to comment on this)
The control assessment should take into account the feedback from the 2 nd marker and
also the supervisors assessment of the students ability to control and management the
entire project. However, apparent management and control may exist because of the
level of advice and direction given by the supervisor. Where this is the case the overall
mark should be reduced accordingly.
Presentation/Viva
The purpose of the presentation (viva) is to allow the student to demonstrate the grasp
they have of the subject of the project and thus to guarantee that they are indeed
responsible for the report submitted. The focus should be on a brief, accurate, critical
summary from the student of what they have done/achieved followed up by a
question/answer session based on the content of the report, demo of the product (where
appropriate) and presentation.
4.6. Timescale
All students are normally expected to complete the project within one academic year.
You will have fixed deadlines for the submission of all work associated with the
project. The table below shows a typical timetable for a centre based student.
Week
Nos.
1-2
3-4
5-11
12
13-22
22-26
26
29
Activity
Staff
AS/WS
MT
AS/WS
11
AS/MT
AS/WS
AS/WS
AS/MT
AS/MT
AS - Academic supervisor
WS - Work based supervisor
MT - Module Team
Students will be supplied with an addendum to this guide giving specific dates for the
required submissions. This will vary from year to year and between centres depending
upon the mode of operation.
5. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
5.1. Preliminary stage
You will be allocated an individual project and a member of staff will be assigned to
supervisor it based on the previous procedures (Choosing an Individual Project, section
2).
You will have the opportunity to read through the project outline, discuss the projects
with your supervisor, summarize the project and proposes the approach, milestones,
deliverables, resources, timeline and scope.
You will prepare and submit a project brief form to your allocated supervisor. Then, the
supervisor will have the opportunity to review, comment and approve it or ask you for
modification. Once the project brief has been approved by the supervisor, you will
move ahead and work on the next stages of the project.
5. 2. Execution
Weekly Meetings
You must arrange regular meetings with your supervisor. The meetings may be brief
once your project is under way but your supervisor needs to be sure that your work is
progressing. If you need to see your supervisor between meetings you should send
mail, asking him/her to suggest a time when he/she will be available. Before the
meeting, you should have prepared a written list of points you wish to discuss. And
during the meeting, you should take notes so that you do not forget the advice you were
given.
Progress Report
You will submit an interim report to the 2nd marker. The report includes a literature
review, objectives, methodology, progress-to-date, initial results and Gantt chart.
Project Review
12
A short meeting (10-15 mins) between you and the 2 nd marker will be held to
professionally review the report. You will have the opportunity to explain your ideas,
show your progress and raise any constraints or problems you have been experiencing.
It is expected that the projects should have progressed to the point were something has
been built or modelled.
Reporting
The 2nd marker will write his/her report about your performance and make
recommendations to your supervisor and the module leader.
13
14
Use of References
You are encouraged to read about your subject and you may quote from those sources,
but you must make it absolutely clear that those words were not your original work.
E.g. "It can be shown that the force is proportional to the square of the velocity."[4]
Here a quotation has been taken from a book, paper, or Internet article, and used within
the report. It is made clear that the words belong to someone else because they are
contained within quotation marks "", while the name of that person will be given at the
end of your report in the reference section beside the number [4].
Often you will want to make use of another worker's ideas, without citing their precise
words. This is also permissible, provided that you credit that person within your text.
E.g. Brown [3] believes the world to be round, while Smith [5] argues for a flat plane.
This is a normally a more appropriate use of a source than to quote verbatim, but there
are occasions when you need to use the exact expression. DO NOT copy large chunks
from texts or other sources however.
If you use someone else's ideas or words within your text without crediting the source,
you are guilty of copying or plagiarism. In the past students have failed their projects,
and therefore their degree, because their reports contained substantial amounts of
copied material. Copying is both unprofessional and dishonest, while the legitimate
use of sources with proper references is an essential part of report writing.
15
16
Appendix 3 - Sample
Gantt Chart
Week No.
Activity
Agree Title and Brief
Submit Brief
Literature Survey
Evolve Concept
Solutions
Write Interim Report
Submit Interim Report
Choose Solution
Scheme Drawing
Calculations
Material Selections
Manufacturing
Selections
Detail Drawings
Build Prototype
Test
Write Final Report
Submit Final Report
Attend Viva
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Here, although possession is implied, no apostrophe is used. This contradicts the rule
given above and you might find it a tad confusing. If you are indeed confused I would
suggest that you always write It is in full, and never use an apostrophe with Its.
2) There and their.
Their indicates possession, while there is a place.
They parked their car over there.
It might help you to remember this by saying Where? Over there, the spelling of
where and there is the same.
3) Affect and Effect
An effect is normally an outcome or result of an action. A simple check is to see if you
can replace the work effect with the word result.
The shooting of the gun had the effect of killing the people.
An important effect was the dissolution of parliament.
The word effected is used in the context of brought about.
He effected the changes by killing his boss and taking his job.
Affect is normally used in the context of influencing something. If you can replace the
word affect(ed) with influence(d) then it is being used correctly.
It was claimed that the gunshot wound had affected his health. The hole in his head
had an affect upon his balance. The effect of the gunshot wound was that he died.
It was claimed that dyeing the food would not affect the taste. However the dye in the
food had the effect of spoiling the taste.
She effected her victory by affecting the judgement of those around her.
19
20
...according to Einstein [27].... and an appropriate list presented as shown in the later
section.
Industrial context
This section should include a description of the present industrial practice and the
potential benefits deriving from implementation of the project findings.
Methodology
A description of the techniques used to develop the solutions to the industrial problem
and for a range of alternative solutions. Clear sketches, plans and descriptions of the
main solution to the problem and of all alternative solutions should be included
together with the rationale for selecting a particular route.
Analysis
Analysis should, where possible, involve mathematical models of the proposed
solution. All calculations should be well annotated being accompanied by clear
diagrams and explanations. Any other aids and such aspects as computer programmes
should be described and/or listed.
Conclusions
These should be bold, clear statements listed 1, 2, 3 and so on to indicate the project
outcomes.
The conclusions will answer such questions as Have the original objectives been
achieved? Does the solution comply with the companys requirements? Do you
recommend that the manufacturing systems or procedural modifications are
implemented?
Suggestions for further work
This section will deal with such aspects as recommendations for extending the study,
for examining further manufacturing conditions and for developing a greater
understanding of the effects of the proposed systems.
References
References are to be presented in the following way:[1] Smith, AB, Jones C, 1993 Advances in the design of manufacturing control
systems, J. Manuf Eng, 22 , 5, 1993, 210-215.
[2] Kirkman, John, 1980 Good Style for Scientific and Engineering Writing, Pitman
Publishers, 1980, p27-33.
21
Appendices
Any useful material which does not contribute directly to the main text or which
because of its sheer bulk would detract from the readers enjoyment should be included
in an Appendix. Such material may include engineering drawings, computer programs,
tables of data, or numerous graphs, recorder printouts etc. Do not photocopy and
include manufacturers data sheets or similar informationha, rather cite them as
references.
General Aspects of the Format of the Report and its Submission
The report should be prepared in 12 point typescript with double line spacing on white
A4 paper. Only one side of the paper should be used. The margins should be as
follows:Left (binding edge) and bottom .................................................35mm
Other margins ..........................................................................14mm
Pages should be numbered consecutively including those on which graphs, diagrams
etc appear. The numbers should be located centrally at the bottom of each page. Roman
numerals should be used up to the end of the Nomenclature section and thereafter
arabic numerals are required.
The length of the report, not including appendices, should not exceed 50 sides.
Two copies of the report should be submitted by the required date.
22
23
A literature survey has been carried out, but not all of the sources are entirely relevant
and it is occasionally difficult to determine the source of a concept. The report has a
reasonable structure and, while there may be some typographical errors and spelling
mistakes, they are not so numerous as to provide a major distraction. Most of the
diagrams are relevant and reasonably executed. In general the report accurately
describes the work carried out, but there may be some ambiguities, or sections which
are not quite clear. The work is clearly reported but the results/findings are not
analysed in any great depth. The reader senses that the student has a reasonable grasp
of the subject but feels that there are a few areas which could have benefited from
further study.
The viva reveals a good, reliable, student of average ability who is reasonably confident
but does not demonstrate complete understanding of the project topic. Most of the
questions are tackled fairly accurately.
3rd
The student has required considerable assistance and guidance and only understands the
main issues with noticeable difficulty. Some progress has been made, achieving the
minimum acceptable standards.
Some attempt has been made to examine the literature and a few sources are cited, but
there may be sections of the report that have clearly been quoted from the work of
others without a proper reference. There may be a some failings in the overall standard
of presentation, e.g. poor or insufficient diagrams, significant numbers of errors. The
report does describe the work carried out, but may be difficult to follow, or may leave
the reader guessing as to what actually happened in some sections. The report is
factual without being analytical. The reader is left with the concern that, while the
work is not without some merit, the student does not fully understand some of the key
aspects of the subject.
Rather indifferent viva. There is evidence that the project has met some of the original
aims but there is much left undone. There is a lack of understanding in several areas.
An inability to successfully answer several questions.
Fail
Little work has been done. The student shows difficulty in understanding the
requirements of the project.
There is very little evidence of a literature survey, save for examples of uncited copied
text that has been used to bulk out the report. The report may be poorly prepared with
numerous errors and with an inadequate number of badly presented diagrams. There
are obvious and significant gaps in the investigation, and there is little evidence to
suggest that any substantial work has been carried out.
During the viva there is little evidence of how the aims of the project have been met
and there is a general inability to answer questions.
24