Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4, December 2013
www.seipub.org/acer
*1
Abstract
Different Pt/SAB and Pd/SAB (40 wt% SiO2 in silica-alumina
carriers with 20 wt% zeolites) catalysts were prepared by
impregnation method and compared with NiW/SAB catalyst.
The results showed that Pt/SAB catalyst had larger surface
area and pore volume compared to NiW/SAB and Pd/SAB
catalysts. Pt and Pd loading, the reaction parameters of
reaction such as temperature and WHSV were investigated.
The hydrocracking reaction results showed that 0.8 wt% Pt
loading catalyst had optimized conversion ratio and
selectivity with 300C and WHSV=2 h-1. Pd/SAB catalyst had
higher gas selectivity but lower naphtha and middle
distillates yield due to the strongest acidic sites. Pt/SAB
catalyst had more stable catalytic activity during
hydrocracking reaction. TEM and ICP results indicated that
Pt was highly dispersed in small clusters and stable after 200
h reaction, while Pd and NiW/SAB catalysts had deactivated
issue.
Keywords
Hydrocracking; Pd/SAB Catalyst; Pt/SAB Catalyst; Deactivation
Introduction
Cleaner fuels can be obtained by natural gas, coal and
biomass conversion to liquid fuels via F-T technology
and alleviate the energy shortage caused by crude oil
fluctuation. The hydrocracking reaction is applied to
produce middle distillates which can cut long chain
hydrocarbon. Shell, Exxon, Sasol and other major
international petrochemical companies have invested
in this field. The hydrocracking catalyst is
characterized by the presence of two types of active
sites. Acidic sites act as isomerization and cracking
function while metal sites have hydrogenation and
dehydrogenation function. The noble metal (Pt, Pd)
and transition metal (W, Ni, Mo, Co) are commonly
used. The noble metal (especially Pt) shows better
performances in terms of selectivity and conversion
73
Journal Website
74
Catalysts
SBET (m2/g)
PV (m3/g)
APD (nm)
NiW/ SiO2-Al2O3
208
0.503
9.7
NiW/SAB
188
0.467
9.9
Pt-0.008/SAB
240
0.588
9.8
Pd-0.008/SAB
223
0.547
9.9
Notes: SBET; surface area; PV; pore volume; APD; average pore
diameter
www.seipub.org/acer
Selectivity (%)
PtLoading
(wt)
T
(C)
WH
SV
(h-1)
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
Pt-0.01
Pt-0.008
Pt-0.005
Gas
26.2
1
18.0
6
15.6
8
16.0
6
16.2
8
4.24
8.91
8.18
Na
ph
.
M
D
68.
98
67.
58
67.
78
67.
58
58.
07
46.
24
58.
41
53.
2
4.8
2
14.
36
16.
57
16.
22
18.
15
49.
51
22.
85
38.
62
Naphtha
and MD
yield (%)
68.06
81.46
76.85
82.31
61.04
67.18
58.66
38.74
Selectivity
Pt-0.003
Con
versi
on
(%)
92.2
2
99.4
2
91.1
1
98.2
2
80.0
9
70.1
7
72.1
6
42.1
9
Selectivity
75
Journal Website
Selectivity
Selectivity(%)
T (C)
WH
SV
(h-1)
Conve
rsion
(%)
Gas
Naph.
MD
300
310
320
330
340
350
2
2
2
2
2
2
90.74
96.50
98.22
99.54
94.74
90.41
13.60
16.04
16.06
38.48
34.76
34.69
41.50
63.41
67.58
60.45
64.43
62.94
44.93
20.55
16.22
1.11
0.82
2.1
Naph.
and
MD
yield(%)
78.43
81.02
82.31
61.28
61.82
58.8
Selectivity(%)
T
(C)
WH
SV
(h-1)
Conversi
on (%)
Gas
Naph.
260
41.29
12.11
52.94
280
300
1
1
96.26
98.53
60.35
59.69
37.76
39.94
300
78.59
46.62
39.74
300
66.09
38.49
35.64
MD
34.9
5
2.12
0.38
13.5
6
26.0
1
Naph. and
MD yield(%)
38.30
38.39
39.73
41.89
40.74
www.seipub.org/acer
hydrocracking reaction.
100
Selectivity
Conversion/ %
90
80
70
60
50
Pd/SAB
NiW/SAB
Pt/SAB
40
30
0
50
100
150
200
Time/ h
Selectivity
Catalysts
NiW/SAB
Pt-0.008/SAB
Pd-0.008/SAB
SBET (m2/g)
Fresh
Used
188
177
240
228
223
189
APD (nm)
Fresh
Used
9.9
9.1
9.8
9.6
9.9
8.4
Conclusion
The different temperature and Pt loading have been
investigated via fixed bed reactor 0.8 wt% Pt loading
catalyst had similar selectivity of C5-C15 and higher
77
Journal Website
78
MANAGE.
50
(2009)
855-876.