Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4223
Member ASHRAE
ABSTRACT
Transfer pumping interfaces are an important component
of chilled water storage systems and other open hydronic
systems. This paper describes a parametric study of seven
interface types applied to a representative chilled water storage application. Interface types considered include indirect
(heat exchanger) interfaces, direct interfaces, direct interfaces
with energy recovery operated at variable or constant speed,
and reversible variable-speed direct interfaces. Annual simulations on an hourly time step were performed using component models described in Part 1 of this paper. Seven levels of
static head, varying from 90 ft to 360 ft (27 m to 110 m), were
considered for each alternative. Construction costs were estimated and economic performance was described in terms of
simple payback period and life-cycle cost. Results of the study
suggest that energy recovery for direct interfaces may be feasible for static head as low as 120 ft (37 m) and that indirect interfaces may not be economically superior except at very high
levels of static head due to high capital cost
INTRODUCTION
Stratified chilled water thermal storage is frequently
incorporated into large chilled water systems because of the
substantial economic and operational benefits it offers. For
reasons of cost, stratified storage tanks are typically unpressurized vessels. For aesthetic reasons, tank height is typically
limited to such an extent that the free surface of water in the
tank is not the highest point in the chilled water system. When
this is the case, a pumping interface is required to move water
from the tank to the system because of the adverse static pressure differential that exists between them. Figure 1 schematically indicates the relationship between a typical open thermal
storage tank, chilled water system, and transfer pumping interface. In addition to controlling pressure and flow rate, a transfer pumping interface also controls flow direction through the
piping that connects it to the chilled water system. A transfer
pumping interface adds capital cost to a chilled water storage
system and can be a major energy consumer if the static pressure differential is large.
The economics of transfer pumping depend strongly upon
the size of the static pressure differential. When this differential is small, the additional energy consumption it causes may
be too small to warrant special energy conservation measures.
However, as the static differential becomes larger, growing
operating cost may justify additional capital expenditures to
limit pump energy usage.
One alternative for large adverse static differential situations is to eliminate the problem by using a heat exchanger to
separate the system into hydraulically independent low- and
high-pressure zones. Another option is the use of hydraulic
turbines in conjunction with a direct interface to recover a
portion of the added pumping power from water flowing back
to the storage tank. Reverse-running centrifugal pumps are
typically used as hydraulic turbines in this application because
they are lower in cost than specially built turbines and have
good performance characteristics when applied with care
(Buse 1981). The heat exchanger interface usually reduces
pumping costs, but it also increases storage tank size. This
trade-off tends to favor the use of energy recovery at moderately large static head differentials and the use of a heat
exchanger interface when static head is very large.
The system designer must select an appropriate interface
type based on reasonable technical and economic criteria.
Tackett (1988) compared the performance of a direct interface
with energy recovery to that of an indirect interface for a high-
William P. Bahnfleth is an assistant professor in the Department of Architectural Engineering at Penn State University, University Park, Pa.
Christopher G. Kirchner is a project mechanical engineer at SHG, Inc., Detroit, Mich.
THIS PREPRINT IS FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY, FOR INCLUSION IN ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 1999, V. 105, Pt. 1. Not to be reprinted in whole or in
part without written permission of the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329.
Opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASHRAE. Written
questions and comments regarding this paper should be received at ASHRAE no later than February 13, 1999.
Figure 1 Typical chilled water system with open stratified chilled water storage tank and transfer pumping interface.
rise office building with a thermal storage tank located in its
basement. He concluded that energy recovery should be
considered whenever the use of an indirect interface might
also be feasible. Tackett also suggested as a specific guideline
that direct pumping without energy recovery is the most
economical alternative below a twenty-story differential.
Tacketts study, which is the only published analysis of its
type, considering only constant-speed pump and turbine operation, was based only on simple payback analysis and considered a thermal storage system that is atypical in a number of
significant respects. Consequently, a clear need exists to
extend this analysis to include variable-speed pumping, lifecycle cost analysis, and more representative storage systems.
The objective of the present work is to provide a detailed
analysis of transfer pumping economics for a system representative of chilled water storage installations designed in
accordance with current good practice. The performance of
seven interface types is compared in a typical district cooling
application with the adverse static pressure differential varying from 90 ft to 360 ft (27.4 m to 109.7 m) of water. Hourly
time step annual simulations to determine energy consumption and cost characteristics of each interface are performed
using models described in detail in Part 1 of this paper (Bahnfleth and Kirchner 1998). Simulation results and capital cost
estimates are used to determine life-cycle cost and simple
payback periods for each interface type as a function of static
pressure differential. Because of the number of interface types
and static pressure differential levels evaluated, only one
representative load profile and electric rate structure were
considered. However, the results of this analysis are quite clear
in their qualitative implications for interface design and can be
generalized on that basis.
INTERFACE ALTERNATIVES
The following discussion briefly reviews the classification of transfer pumping interfaces and summarizes the alter2
4223
4223
TABLE 1
Summary of Interface Types
Description
Indirect, Constant Speed
Acronym
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
Figure 6 Design day cooling load profile and level load thermal storage system operation.
by accident. However, because all interfaces were subjected to
the same loadings and flow rates, it was felt that this assumption would not diminish the significance of pumping energy
comparisons. Discharge capacity needed to serve the system
load could be deducted from storage as long as the inventory
remained positive. For the purpose of implementing the thermal storage operating strategy, it was assumed that the chilled
water plant was composed of multiple 3,000 ton (10,560 kW)
chillers and that the chiller capacity on-line during discharge
was fully loaded.
The thermal storage interface was modeled explicitly, but
the plant was not. Refrigeration plant modeling was not necessary because system-side charging and return temperatures
were assumed to be the same for all interface types. This
implies that, for indirect interface cases, a 43F system-side
discharge temperature is acceptable. For many systems, this
would be satisfactory, but in some instances, use of an indirect
interface would make it necessary to lower the system-side
charging temperature in order to achieve the same discharge
temperature as the direct case. The resulting compressor
energy penalty in such cases should be charged to the indirect
interface, which would reduce its economic attractiveness.
Chiller charge and discharge capacity requirements were
computed on the basis of design thermal storage tank capacity
and daily integrated cooling load. Each interface was assumed
to have sets of three identical parallel transfer pumps. The
minimum increment of storage capacity dispatched was 800
tons (2,814 kW), based on a criterion of limiting minimum
continuous transfer pump flow rate to approximately 40% of
the capacity of one pump.
The sizing and operation of storage were based on the
simplified electric rate structure summarized in Table 2. It is
6
TABLE 2
Electric Utility Rate Summary
On-Peak Rates*
Winter
Summer
Usage ($/kWh)
0.053
0.081
Demand ($/kW
8.07
16.35
Winter
Summer
Usage ($/kWh)
0.042
0.042
Demand ($/kW
0.000
0.000
Off-Peak Rates
curves for direct interfaces with 180 ft and 310 ft (55 m and
95 m) of static pressure differential are shown in Figures 7
and 8. Pump curves shown in these figures are manufacturers data; turbine curves were generated using techniques
described in Part 1.
Selection of pumps/turbines for a reversible interface is
highly constrained. The required component must not only
provide the necessary flow when functioning as a pump, it
must also recover a significant amount of energy across a
range of flow rates when operating as a turbine. Satisfactory
selections were not found in the manufacturers line for the
constant-speed case. Since the equipment line of the manufacturer is quite extensive, it was concluded that the difficulties
encountered are likely to be generic. With the exception of the
90 ft (27 m) case, however, it was possible to select pumps that
would also function adequately as turbines at variable speed.
Pump/turbine selections for reversible interface cases are
shown in Table 5.
Capital Cost
Capital cost estimates were developed to determine the
investment required for each alternative and are summarized
in Table 6. Estimates included the complete interface from the
tank to the connection point on the primary/secondary chilled
water system and the cost of the thermal storage tank. Cost
data for piping and piping system components were obtained
from a standard source (Means 1996). The costs of pumps,
turbines, clutches, heat exchangers, and variable-speed drives
were obtained directly from equipment vendors. The cost of
the clutch included in turbine costs for each of the unidirectional interfaces (Table 6a) was $8,000. Variable-speed pump
costs in Table 6a include variable-frequency drive costs ranging from $13,165 to $22,956 as a function of horsepower. The
reversing option for the drives in the RDVT interface added
$3,900 to $7,500, also depending on the drive horsepower. A
TABLE 3
Pump Best Efficiency Point Data
Static Pressure
Flow Rate
Pressure
Speed
(rpm)
Specific
Speed*
Brake Power
Motor Power
(m)
Eff.
(%)
(Bhp)
(kW)
(Mhp)
(kW)
75
23
88
1780
3506
54
40
75
56
159
88
26
88
1780
3110
64
47
75
56
2070
131
125
38
88
1780
2166
74
55
100
75
(ft of water)
(m)
Interface
Type
Indirect
90
27
130
40
2070
131
170
51
88
1780
1720
101
75
125
93
180
55
2070
131
220
66
88
1780
1418
131
97
150
112
220
67
2070
131
260
78
81
1750
1230
168
125
200
149
260
79
2070
131
300
90
83
1750
1105
189
141
200
149
310
94
2070
131
350
105
80
1750
984
229
171
250
186
360
110
2070
131
400
120
80
1750
890
261
195
300
224
Direct
(gpm)
(L/s)
(ft of water)
2520
159
2520
4223
TABLE 4a
Turbine Selection Data for Unidirectional Interfaces (Turbine Best Efficiency Point Data)
Static Pressure
Flow Rate
Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
(gpm)
(L/s)
(ft of water)
(m)
Eff. (%)
Specific Speed*
90
27
2070
131
55
17
79
4010
130
40
2070
131
90
27
79
2772
180
55
2070
131
135
41
88
2045
220
67
2070
131
170
51
87
1691
260
79
2070
131
200
60
88
1497
310
94
2070
131
240
72
86
1306
360
110
2070
131
275
83
84
1179
TABLE 4b
Turbine Selection Data for Unidirectional Interfaces
(Pump Best Efficiency Point Selection Data for Turbine Operation)
Static Pressure
Flow Rate
Pressure
Eff. (%)
(ft of water)
(m)
(gpm)
(L/s)
(ft of water)
(m)
90
27
1715
108
41
12
79
130
40
1715
108
68
20
79
180
55
1870
118
116
35
88
220
67
1850
117
144
43
87
260
79
1870
118
172
52
88
310
94
1835
116
200
60
86
360
110
1800
114
223
67
84
TABLE 5
Reversible Interface Pump and Turbine Selections
Static Pressure
Pressure
Brake Power
Motor Power
(ft of
water)
(m)
(gpm)
(L/s)
(ft of
water)
(m)
Eff.
(%)
Speed
(rpm)
Specific
Speed*
(Bhp)
(kW)
(Mhp)
(KW)
90
27
130
40
5000
315
230
69
89
1780
2131
326
243
150
112
180
55
5600
353
230
69
91
1780
2255
357
267
200
149
220
67
5150
325
250
75
84
1750
1997
387
289
200
149
260
79
2750
173
220
66
90
1750
1607
170
127
250
186
310
94
2750
173
300
90
84
1750
1273
248
185
300
224
360
110
2750
173
330
99
84
1750
1185
273
203
350
261
90
27
130
40
5489
346
265
79
79
1780
2011
180
55
6039
381
258
77
88
1780
2151
220
67
5921
374
308
92
87
1750
1831
260
79
2992
189
250
75
88
1750
1524
310
94
3162
199
370
111
86
1750
1167
360
110
3162
199
407
122
84
1750
1086
4223
Figure 7 Direct interface pump and turbine selections180 ft (55 m) static pressure differential.
Figure 8 Direct interface pump and turbine selections310 ft (95 m) static pressure differential.
4223
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
37,590
123,891
28,500
72,094
63,900
107,494
97,744
130
40
37,590
123,891
34,500
81,896
69,900
117,296
125,969
180
55
37,590
123,891
40,155
95,924
75,555
131,324
140,273
220
67
37,590
123,891
48,900
110,918
86,100
148,118
151,418
260
79
37,590
123,891
48,900
110,918
86,100
148,118
162,266
310
94
37,590
123,891
60,900
128,366
94,800
162,266
191,666
360
110
37,590
123,891
70,800
144,566
104,700
178,466
206,966
All values include installation cost. Variable-speed drive and clutch prices are included where applicable.
TABLE 6b
Cost Summary: Component Cost
Storage Tank ($)*
Item
Storage Tank
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
1,477,649
1,477,649
1,196,192
1,196,192
1,196,192
1,196,192
1,196,192
147,765
147,765
119,619
119,619
119,619
119,619
119,619
1,625,414
1,625,414
1,315,811
1,315,811
1,315,811
1,315,811
1,315,811
Mark-Up (10%)
Total
218,262
218,262
179,316
179,316
208,708
208,708
200,783
Heat Exchanger
500,000
500,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
718,262
718,262
179,316
179,316
208,708
208,708
200,783
Total
*
TABLE 6c
Cost Summary: Total Capital Cost
Total Capital Cost ($)*
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,644,991
1,714,044
1,747,622
1,816,675
130
40
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,654,495
1,729,570
1,757,126
1,832,202
1,833,385
180
55
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,663,452
1,751,790
1,766,084
1,854,422
1,856,043
220
67
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,677,304
1,775,541
1,782,787
1,881,023
1,873,696
260
79
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,677,304
1,775,541
1,782,787
1,881,023
1,890,880
310
94
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,696,312
1,803,178
1,796,568
1,903,434
1,937,449
360
110
2,822,683
2,959,383
1,711,994
1,828,839
1,812,249
1,929,094
1,961,684
Includes markup on all items other than the storage tank (based on 10% contingency, 20% general conditions, and 20% overhead and profit).
require special site work and foundations. The use of a relatively low estimate for tank cost casts indirect interfaces in the
most favorable light possible because it minimizes the size
penalty associated with a diminished temperature differential.
The implications of this assumption will be discussed following the presentation of results.
Energy Analysis
Table 7 summarizes annual electric demand and usage
characteristics for each case. Demand results presented in
Table 7 are the total of twelve monthly on-peak demands, i.e.,
the annual billing demand for each case. These results are
provided to give a gross comparison between alternatives.
Monthly maximum on-peak demands for each interface for
the 90 ft (28 m) and 360 ft (110 m) of water cases are listed in
Table 8. The relatively level monthly on-peak demands listed
are due to the interaction of the control strategy and load
profile. Storage is utilized to nearly its full capacity at some
TABLE 7a
Annual Interface Energy Consumption: Usage
Static Pressure
Usage (kW)
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
788,238
447,190
555,826
481,166
414,850
343,724
130
40
788,238
447,190
738,005
660,836
504,892
428,944
532,320
180
55
788,238
447,190
966,186
885,682
569,741
492,476
673,170
220
67
788,238
447,190
1,249,626
1,161,261
765,489
677,496
791,993
260
79
788,238
447,190
1,423,165
1,326,697
818,665
727,788
919,483
310
94
788,238
447,190
1,727,053
1,627,125
1,022,557
922,576
1,131,728
360
110
788,238
447,190
1,972,752
1,880,756
1,204,902
1,093,656
1,323,420
TABLE 7b
Annual Interface Energy Consumption: Demand
Demand (kW)*
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
3,283
3,407
2,133
2,206
1,497
1,543
130
40
3,283
3,407
2,854
2,965
1,842
1,817
2,462
180
55
3,283
3,407
3,767
3,928
2,163
1,901
2,645
220
67
3,283
3,407
4,876
5,072
2,886
2,567
3,289
260
79
3,283
3,407
5,594
5,823
3,139
2,663
3,695
310
94
3,283
3,407
6,767
7,045
3,899
3,367
4,404
360
110
3,283
3,407
7,723
8,061
4,555
3,994
5,247
4223
11
90 (27 m)
IV
DC
DV
Month
DCT
DVT
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
Jan
274
263
176
177
125
126
632
650
381
333
437
Feb
274
293
178
187
125
130
648
681
378
332
437
Mar
274
290
178
186
125
130
647
678
377
333
438
Apr
274
265
176
178
125
125
633
653
380
333
438
May
274
276
177
181
125
127
639
664
380
333
438
Jun
274
290
178
186
125
130
647
678
380
333
437
July
274
282
178
183
125
128
643
670
380
333
438
Aug
274
287
178
185
125
129
645
675
378
333
436
Sep
274
292
178
186
125
130
648
680
380
333
436
Oct
274
291
178
186
125
130
648
679
380
333
437
Nov
274
289
178
185
125
129
646
677
380
333
438
Dec
274
289
178
185
125
129
646
677
380
333
437
360 (110 m)
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
42
20
13
25
38
130
40
39
10
32
42
28
180
55
18
54
41
49
30
220
67
37
64
39
46
37
260
79
45
69
42
49
35
310
94
54
74
41
47
34
360
110
60
77
39
45
33
TABLE 9b
Percent Reduction in Annual Energy Consumption Relative to the DC Interface: Demand
Percent Reduction in Annual Energy Demand *
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
54
60
30
28
130
40
15
19
35
36
14
180
55
13
10
43
50
30
220
67
33
30
41
47
33
260
79
41
39
44
52
34
310
94
51
50
42
50
35
360
110
57
56
41
48
32
Energy Cost
Annual interface electric costs calculated using the electric rate structure shown in Table 2 are summarized in Table
10. Annual energy cost savings for each interface relative to
the DC alternative are shown in Figure 10. The range of interface operating costs shown provides a striking illustration of
the importance of minimizing adverse static differential in
systems with direct interfaces. From the least operating cost
system (DVT) at 90 ft (28 m) of static to the highest cost (DC)
system at 360 ft (110 m), pumping energy cost increases by
more than a factor of five.
The annual pumping cost per ton-hour of delivered storage is shown in Table 11. These costs are obtained by dividing
the total annual energy cost for the interface by the total capacity delivered to the load. Consequently, they include the cost
of pumping during both charging and discharging and represent the energy cost that would be incurred by a purchaser of
chilled water. Prices for district chilled water in the U.S. range
from less than 15/ton-h (4.3/kWh) to more than 35/ton-h
(10/kWh) with 25/ton-h (7.1/kWh) being a typical value
(Pierce 1997). At the low end of the static head range, unit
4223
Figure 9 Annual interface pumping energy: (a) constant speed, (b) variable speed.
14
4223
Demand ($)
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
35,566
37,028
23,113
23,934
16,216
16,736
130
40
35,566
37,028
30,934
32,166
19,955
19,707
26,676
180
55
35,566
37,028
40,837
42,615
23,433
20,607
28,651
220
67
35,566
37,028
52,859
55,029
31,262
27,822
35,633
260
79
35,566
37,028
60,646
63,184
34,004
28,855
40,036
310
94
35,566
37,028
73,372
76,438
42,243
36,479
47,715
360
110
Static Pressure
35,566
37,028
83,738
87,456
Usage ($)
49,346
43,262
56,835
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
41,611
23,112
29,399
25,324
21,979
18,102
130
40
41,611
23,112
39,019
34,809
26,758
22,627
28,026
180
55
41,611
23,112
51,080
46,678
30,248
26,029
35,468
220
67
41,611
23,112
66,067
61,225
40,639
35,830
45,188
260
79
41,611
23,112
75,237
69,953
43,504
38,542
48,731
310
94
41,611
23,112
91,310
85,819
54,350
48,877
59,933
360
110
Static Pressure
41,611
23,112
104,303
99,219
Total ($)
64,015
57,946
70,123
RDVT
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
90
27
77,177
60,140
52,512
49,258
38,195
34,839
130
40
77,177
60,140
69,952
66,976
46,714
42,333
54,702
180
55
77,177
60,140
91,917
89,293
53,681
46,635
64,119
220
67
77,177
60,140
118,926
116,254
71,902
63,652
80,821
260
79
77,177
60,140
135,883
133,137
77,508
67,397
88,767
310
94
77,177
60,140
164,682
162,257
96,593
85,357
107,648
360
110
77,177
60,140
188,041
186,676
113,361
101,208
126,957
Figure 10 Annual energy cost savings relative to the direct constant-speed interface (see Table 1 for acronym definitions).
4223
15
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
0.68
0.53
0.45
0.44
0.34
0.31
130
40
0.68
0.53
0.62
0.59
0.41
0.37
0.48
180
55
0.68
0.53
0.81
0.79
0.47
0.41
0.57
220
67
0.68
0.53
1.05
1.03
0.64
0.56
0.71
260
79
0.68
0.53
1.20
1.18
0.68
0.60
0.78
310
94
0.68
0.53
1.45
1.43
0.85
0.75
0.95
360
110
0.68
0.53
1.66
1.65
1.00
0.89
1.12
TABLE 11b
Average Annual Delivered Storage Pumping Energy Costs (SI Units)
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
0.19
0.15
0.13
0.12
0.10
0.09
130
40
0.19
0.15
0.18
0.17
0.12
0.11
0.14
180
55
0.19
0.15
0.23
0.22
0.13
0.12
0.16
220
67
0.19
0.15
0.30
0.29
0.18
0.16
0.20
260
79
0.19
0.15
0.34
0.33
0.19
0.17
0.22
310
94
0.19
0.15
0.41
0.41
0.24
0.21
0.27
360
110
0.19
0.15
0.47
0.47
0.28
0.25
0.32
Simple Payback
The results of simple payback analysis are presented in
Table 12 and Figure 11. The direct interface without energy
recovery is used as the basis for calculating payback. Payback
relative to the constant-speed DC case is shown in Figure 11a
and payback relative to the variable-speed DV case is shown
in Figure 11b. Payback periods are shorter when the more
expensive DV case is used as the base despite its lower energy
cost.
The payback of the indirect interface is, at best, marginal
over the entire range of static pressure considered. Even with
a static differential of 360 ft (110 m), the simple payback of the
IC and IV alternatives is on the order of ten years. The best
payback achieved is 8.9 years with 360 ft (110 m) of static
head, and payback becomes much worse at lower values. At
90 ft (28 m) of static differential, payback does not occur
because savings are negative. Payback for systems with
energy recovery is relatively longer at lower levels of static
differential but drops below five years before static pressure
reaches 150 ft (46 m). As Figure 11a shows, variable-speed
pumping without energy recovery is not attractive on the basis
of payback at any point within the range of static head differential considered. However, the benefits of variable-speed
pumping for chilled water thermal storage system should not
be evaluated solely in economic terms (Bahnfleth 1995).
16
Figure 11 Simple payback period as a function of static pressure: (a) relative to DC interface, (b) relative to DV interface (see
Table 1 for acronym definitions).
4223
17
(ft of water)
(m)
DV
IC
IV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
21.2
None
None
7.2
9.7
130
40
25.2
None
132.7
4.4
6.4
11.7
180
55
33.7
78.5
40.7
2.7
4.2
6.9
220
67
36.8
27.4
21.8
2.2
3.7
5.2
260
79
35.8
19.5
16.9
1.8
3.0
4.5
310
94
44.1
12.8
12.1
1.5
2.6
4.2
360
110
85.6
10.0
9.7
1.3
2.5
3.8
TABLE 12b
Simple Payback SummaryBase: Variable-Speed Direct Interface
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DCT
DVT
RDVT
90
27
None
None
3.0
7.1
130
40
None
179.5
1.4
4.2
8.5
180
55
88.2
41.3
0.4
2.4
4.1
220
67
26.7
21.1
0.2
2.0
2.8
260
79
18.7
16.2
0.1
1.6
2.6
1.3
2.5
1.2
2.1
310
94
12.0
11.3
360
110
9.1
8.9
TABLE 13
Life-Cycle Cost Summary
Static Pressure
(ft of water)
(m)
IC
IV
DC
DV
DCT
DVT
90
27
3,912,708
3,808,781
2,386,650
2,409,744
2,287,080
2,308,726
130
40
3,912,708
3,808,781
2,642,475
2,675,514
2,416,893
2,430,104
2,605,985
180
55
3,912,708
3,808,781
2,961,655
3,012,941
2,524,253
2,513,084
2,761,641
220
67
3,912,708
3,808,781
3,356,982
3,417,473
2,798,303
2,780,030
3,015,182
260
79
3,912,708
3,808,781
3,596,473
3,655,924
2,877,482
2,832,910
3,144,589
310
94
3,912,708
3,808,781
4,022,228
4,094,843
3,160,816
3,108,983
3,457,840
360
110
3,912,708
3,808,781
4,367,823
4,465,383
3,413,317
3,358,523
3,754,789
RDVT
and below the values assumed for this study. Two scenarios
were considered: (1) 10% increase in capital costs combined
with 10% reduction in energy costs and (2) 10% decrease in
capital costs combined with 10% increase in energy costs. The
net savings, payback period, and life-cycle costs were calculated for each scenario and compared with the results obtained
with baseline assumptions.
The results of the simple payback sensitivity analysis for
the DCT interface are plotted in Figure 13a. It can be observed
4223
Figure 12 Life-cycle costs as a function of static pressure: (a) constant-speed alternatives (DVT shown for comparison), (b)
variable-speed alternatives (see Table 1 for acronym definitions).
4223
19
Figure 13 Simple payback and life-cycle cost sensitivityDCT interface: (a) simple payback, (b) life-cycle cost.
20
4223
4223
22
Petersen, S.R. 1997. Energy price indices and discount factors for life-cycle cost analysis 1997. Washington D.C.:
U.S. Department of Commerce.
Tackett, R.K. 1988. The use of direct pumping and hydraulic
turbines in thermal storage systems. ASHRAE Transactions 94(1): 1989 - 2007.
4223