Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The finance industry has had an enviable contribution to the whole Global Business
Market. For every type of Business we need many resources which are useful for the
development of Business. Finance is one of the most important resources to start a business or to
develop a Business. So, the first and foremost important resource is finance to start and to face
the competition in the Business Market.
In this competitive world every individual needs money to run to lead his life
successfully. So, he follows different techniques to save his income in order to face future risks
and uncertainties.
Investing in securities is one of the ways where an individual mostly like to adopt as
a source of income, because securities are those which may give him more returns and they are
also more risky.
Keeping in mind all the above this project work done for INDIABULLS, to know the
market position and a keen study is done on securities by taking 6 sectors with six companies
with their annual returns and companies information which is required is collected from their
company sites and magazines and successfully completed
ANALYSIS & PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
Page numbers
List of tables
List of graphs
iii
Chapter 1
1.1 Introduction
1.4 Scope
1.5 Methodology
1.6 Limitations
Chapter 2
Review of literature
Chapter 3
Company profile
41
Chapter 4
Data analysis
45
Chapter 5
5.1 Findings
70
5.2 Conclusions
71
5.3 Suggestions
73
Bibliography
74
List of tables
TABLE
PARTICULARS
PAGE NO.
4.1
45
4.2
46
4.3
47
4.4
4.5
4.6
50
4.7
51
4.8
52
4.9
53
4.10
54
4.11
55
4.12
56
4.13
57
48
49
4.14
58
CORRELATION BETWEEN ITC & COLGATE&PALMOLIVE
4.15
59
4.16
60
4.17
STANDARD DEVIATION
61
i
4.18
AVERAGE
62
4.19
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
63
4.20
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
67
4.21
PORTFOLIO RETURN RP
68
4.22
PORTFOLIO RISK
69
ii
LIST OF GRAPHS
GRAPH
PARTICULARS
PAGE No.
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
STANDARD DEVIATION
AVERAGE
PORTFOLIO RETURN
PORTFOLIO RISK
iii
61
62
68
69
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Portfolio management and investment decision as a concept came to be
familiar with the conclusion of second world war when thing can be in the stock market can be
liberally ruined the fortune of individual, companies ,even government s it was then discovered
that the investing in various scripts instead of putting all the money in a single securities yielded
weather return with low risk percentage, it goes to the credit of HARY MERKOWITZ, 1991
noble laurelled to have pioneered the concept of combining high yielded securities with these
low but steady yielding securities to achieve optimum correlation coefficient of shares.
Definition by SEBI
A portfolio management is the total holdings of securities belonging to any person.
Portfolio is a combination of securities that have returns and risk characteristics of their own;
port folio may not take on the aggregate characteristics of their individual parts.
Thus a portfolio is a combination of various assets and /or instruments of
investments. Combination may have different features of risk and return separate from those of
the components. The portfolio is also built up of the wealth or income of the investor over a
period of time with a view to suit is return or risk preference to that of the portfolio that he holds.
The portfolio analysis is thus an analysis is thus an analysis of risk return characteristics of
individual securities in the portfolio and changes that may take place in combination with other
securities due interaction among them and impact of each on others. Security analysis is only a
tool for efficient portfolio management; both of them together and cannot be dissociated.
Portfolios are combination of assets held by the investors.
These combination may be various assets classed like equity and debt or of different issues
like Govt. bonds and corporate debts are of various instruments like discount bonds, debentures
and blue chip equity nor scripts of emerging Blue chip companies.
Portfolio analysis includes portfolio construction, selection of securities revision of
portfolio evaluation and monitoring of the performance of the portfolio. All these are part of the
portfolio management.
The traditional portfolio theory aims at the selection of such securities that would fit in
will with the asset preferences, needs and choices of the investors. Thus, retired executive invests
in fixed income securities for a regular and fixed return. A business executive or a
young
aggressive investor on the other hand invests in and rowing companies and in risky ventures.
The modern portfolio theory postulates that maximization of returns and minimization of
risk will yield optional returns and the choice and attitudes of investors are only a starting point
for investment decisions and that vigorous risk returns analysis is necessary for optimization of
returns. Portfolio analysis includes portfolio construction, selection of securities, and revision of
portfolio evaluation and monitoring of the performance of the portfolio. All these are part of the
portfolio management.
1.2 NEED OF STUDY
The stock markets have become attractive investment options for the common man. But
the need is to be able to effectively and efficiently manage investments in order to keep
maximum returns with minimum risk.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
To construct an effective portfolio which offers the maximum return for minimum risk.
1.4 SCOPE
1.5 METHODOLOGY
Primary source
Information gathered from interacting with Mr.B.SATISH in the class room. And the
data from the textbooks and other magazines.
Secondary source
1.6 LIMITATIONs
CHAPTER -2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
what assets to purchase, how many to purchase, when to purchase them, and what assets to
divest. These decisions always involve some sort of performance measurement, most typically
expected return on the portfolio, and the risk associated with this return (i.e. the standard
deviation of the return). Typically the expected returns from portfolios, comprised of different
asset bundles are compared.
The unique goals and circumstances of the investor must also be considered. Some investors are
more risk averse than others. Mutual funds have developed particular techniques to optimize
their portfolio holdings.
Thus, portfolio management is all about strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in
the choice of debt vs. equity, domestic vs. international, growth vs. safety and numerous
other trade-offs encountered in the attempt to maximize return at a given appetite for risk.
ELEMENTS
formulated. This will help the selection of asset classes and securities in each class
depending upon their risk-return attributes.
Finally, the evaluation of portfolio for the results to compare with the
targets and needed adjustments have to be made in the portfolio to the emerging
conditions and to make up for any shortfalls in achievements (targets).
The Portfolio Program and Asset Management Program both follow a disciplined process to
establish and monitor an optimal investment mix. This six-stage process helps ensure that the
investments match investors unique needs, both now and in the future.
When the optimal investment mix is determined, the next step is to formalize our goals and
objectives in order to utilize them as a benchmark to monitor progress and future updates.
4. SELECT INVESTMENTS
The customized portfolio is created using an allocation of select QFM Funds. Each QFM
Fund is designed to satisfy the requirements of a specific asset class, and is selected in the
necessary proportion to match the optimal investment mix.
5. MONITOR PROGRESS
Building an optimal investment mix is only part of the process. It is equally important to
maintain the optimal mix when varying market conditions cause investment mix to drift
away from its target. To ensure that mix of asset classes stays in line with investors unique
needs, the portfolio will be monitored and rebalanced back to the optimal investment mix
Just as markets shift, so do the goals and objectives of investors. With the flexibility of the
Portfolio Program and Asset Management Program, when the investors needs or other
life circumstances change, the portfolio has the flexibility to accommodate such changes.
RISK
Risk refers to the probability that the return and therefore the value of an asset or security may
have alternative outcomes. Risk is the uncertainty (today) surrounding the eventual outcome of
an event which will occur in the future. Risk is uncertainty of the income/capital appreciation or
loss of both. All investments are risky. The higher the risk taken, the higher is the return. But
proper management of risk involves the right choice of investments whose risks are
compensation.
RETURN
Return-yield or return differs from the nature of instruments, maturity period and the creditor or
debtor nature of the instrument and a host of other factors. The most important factor influencing
return is risk return is measured by taking the price income plus the price change.
PORTFOLIO RISK
Risk on portfolio is different from the risk on individual securities. This risk is reflected by in the
variability of the returns from zero to infinity. The expected return depends on probability of the
returns and their weighted contribution to the risk of the portfolio.
RETURN ON PORTFOLIO
Each security in a portfolio contributes returns in the proportion of its investment in security.
Thus the portfolio of expected returns, from each of the securities with weights representing the
proportionate share of security in the total investments.
TYPES OF RISKS
Risk consists of two components. They are
1.
Systematic Risk
2.
Un-systematic Risk
1.SYSTEMATIC RISK
Systematic risk refers to that portion of total variability in return caused by factors affecting the
prices of all securities. Economic, Political and sociological changes are sources of systematic
risk. Their effect is to cause prices of nearly all individual common stocks and/or all individual
bonds to move together in the same manner.
i.
Market Risk
Variability in return on most common stocks that are due to basic sweeping changes in investor
expectations is referred to as market risk. Market risk is caused by investor reaction to tangible
as well as intangible events.
ii.
Interest rate-Risk
Interest rate risk refers to the uncertainty of future market values and of the size of future
income, caused by fluctuations in the general level of interest rates.
iii.
Purchasing-Power Risk
Purchasing power risk is the uncertainty of the purchasing power of the amounts to be received.
In more events everyday terms, purchasing power risk refers to the impact of or deflation on an
investment.
3.UNSYSTEMATIC RISK
Unsystematic risk is the portion of total risk that is unique to a firm or industry.
Factors such as management capability, consumer preferences, and labor strikes Cause
systematic variability of return in a firm. Unsystematic factors are largely independent of factors
affecting securities markets in general. Because these factors affect one firm, they must be
examined for each firm.
Unsystematic risk that portion of risk that is unique or peculiar to a firm or an industry, above
and beyond that affecting securities markets in general. Factors such as management capability,
consumer preferences, and labor strikes can cause unsystematic variability of return for a
companys stock.
Business Risk
i.
Business risk is a function of the operating conditions faced by a firm and the variability these
conditions inject into operating income and expected dividends.
Business risk can be divided into two broad categories
a.
b.
a. Internal business risk is associated with the operational efficiency of the firm. The
operational efficiency differs from company to company. The efficiency of operation is
reflected on the companys achievement of its pre-set goals and the fulfillment of the
promises to its investors.
b. External business risk is the result of operating conditions imposed on the firm by
circumstances beyond its control. The external environments in which it operates exert some
pressure on the firm. The external factors are social and regulatory factors, monetary and
fiscal policies of the government, business cycle and the general economic environment
within which a firm or an industry operates.
ii.
Financial Risk
Financial risk is associated with the way in which a company finances its activities. Financial
risk is avoided risk to the extent that management has the freedom to decide to borrow or not to
borrow funds. A firm with no debit financing has no financial risk
MARKOWITZ MODEL
THE MEAN VARIANCE CRITERION
Dr. Harry M. Markowitz is credited with developing the first modern portfolio analysis model in
order to arrange for the optimum allocation of assets with in portfolio. To reach these objectives,
Markowitz generated portfolio with in a reward risk context. In essence, Markowitz model is a
theoretical framework for the analysis of risk return choices. Decisions are based on the concept
of efficient portfolios.
Markowitz model is a theoretical framework for the analysis of risk, return choices and this
approach determines an efficient set of portfolio return through three important variable that is,
Return
Standard Deviation
Coefficient of correlation
Markowitz model is also called as a Full Covariance Model. Through this model the investor
can find out the efficient set of portfolio by finding out the trade off between risk and return,
between the limits of zero and infinity. According to this theory, the effect of one security
purchase over the effects of the other security purchase is taken into consideration and then the
results are evaluated. Markowitz had given up the single stock portfolio and introduced
diversification. The single stock portfolio would be preferable if the investor is perfectly certain
that his expectation of highest return would turn out to be real. In the world of uncertainty, most
of the risk averse investors would like to join Markowitz rather than keeping a single stock,
because diversification reduces the risk.
A portfolio is efficient when it is expected to yield the highest return for the level of risk
accepted or, alternatively the smallest portfolio risk for a specified level of expected return level
chosen, and asset are substituted until the portfolio combination expected returns, set of efficient
portfolio is generated.
Assumptions
The Markowitz model is based on several assumptions regarding investor behavior:
1.
For a given risk level, investors prefer high returns to lower returns.
Similarly for a given level of expected return, investors prefer less risk to more risk.
In developing this model, Markowitz first disposed of the investor behavior rule that the
investor should maximize expected return. This rule implies non-diversified single security
analysis portfolio with the highest expected return is the most desirable portfolio. Only by
buying that single security portfolio would obviously be preferable if the investor were perfectly
certain that this highest expected return would turn out to be the actual return. However, under
real world conditions of uncertainty, most risk adverse investors join with Markowitz in
discarding the role of calling for maximizing the expected returns. As an alternative, Markowitz
offers the expected returns/variance rule.
Markowitz has shown the effect of diversification by regarding the risk of securities. According
to him, the security with the covariance, which is either negative or low amongst them, is the
best manner to reduce risk. Markowitz has been able to show that securities, which have, less
than positive correlation will reduce risk with out, in any way, bringing the return down.
According to his research study a low correlation level between securities in the portfolio will
show less risk. According to him, investing in a large number of securities is not the right method
of investment. It is the right kind of security that brings the maximum results.
Henry Markowitz has given the following formula for a two-security portfolio and three
security portfolios.
,
The Security Market Line, seen here in a graph, describes a relation between the beta and the
asset's expected rate of return
The market reward-to-risk ratio is effectively the market risk premium and by rearranging the
above equation and solving for E (Ri), we obtain the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM).
Where:
returns, or also
,
is the expected return of the market
between the expected market rate of return and the risk-free rate of return).
Beta measures the volatility of the security, relative to the asset class. The equation is saying that
investors require higher levels of expected returns to compensate them for higher expected risk.
We can think of the formula as predicting a security's behavior as a function of beta:
CAPM says that if we know a security's beta then we know the value of r that investors
expect it to have.
Assumptions of CAPM
fixed.
access.
The model assumes that asset returns are (jointly) normally distributed
random variables. It is however frequently observed that returns in equity and other
markets are not normally distributed.
The model does not appear to adequately explain the variation in stock
returns.
The model assumes that given a certain expected return investors will
prefer lower risk (lower variance) to higher risk and conversely given a certain level of
risk will prefer higher returns to lower ones.
The model assumes that all investors have access to the same information
and agree about the risk and expected return of all assets. (Homogeneous expectations
assumption)
is weighted by its market capitalization. This assumes no preference between markets and
assets for individual investors, and that investors choose assets solely as a function of
their risk-return profile. It also assumes that all assets are infinitely divisible as to the
amount which may be held or transacted.
The market portfolio should in theory include all types of assets that are
held by anyone as an investment (including works of art, real estate, human capital...)
Unfortunately, it has been shown that this substitution is not
innocuous and can lead to false inferences as to the validity of the
CAPM, and it has been said that due to the in observability of the
true market portfolio, the CAPM might not be empirically testable.
must comprise every asset, with each asset value-weighted to achieve the above. All such
optimal portfolios, i.e., one for each level of return, comprise the efficient frontier.
A line created from the risk-reward graph, comprised of optimal
portfolios.
The optimal portfolios plotted along the curve have the highest
expected return possible for the given amount of risk.
Because the unsystemic risk is diversifiable, the total risk of a portfolio can be viewed as beta.
Note 1: The expected market rate of return is usually measured by looking at the arithmetic
average of the historical returns on a market portfolio.
Note 2: The risk free rate of return used for determining the risk premium is usually the
arithmetic average of historical risk free rates of return and not the current risk free rate of
return.
Measuring
the
Expected
Return
and
Standard
Deviation
of
Portfolio
The expected return on a portfolio is the weighted average of the returns of individual assets,
where each asset's weight is determined by its weight in the portfolio.
The formula is:
E (Rp) = [WaX E (Ra)] + [WaX E (Ra)]
Where
The portfolio standard deviation ( p) measure the risk associated with the expected return of the
portfolio.
The formula is p = wa2 2 + wa2 2 + 2wawbrab a b
The term rab represents the correlation between the returns of investments a and b. The correlation
coefficient, r, will always reduce the portfolio standard deviation as long as it is less than +1.00.
Portfolio diversification
Diversification
occurs
when
different
assets
make
up
portfolio.
The benefit of diversification is risk reduction; the extent of this benefit depends upon how the
returns of various assets behave over time. The market rewards diversification. We can lower risk
without sacrificing expected return, and/or we can increase expected return without having to
assume more risk. Diversifying among different kinds of assets is called asset allocation.
The diversification can either be vertical or horizontal.
In vertical diversification a portfolio can have scripts of different companies within the same
industry. In horizontal diversification one can have different scripts chosen from different
industries.
in
foreign
stocks
and
bonds.
The graph on the shows how volatility increases the risk of loss of principal, and how this risk
worsens as the time horizon shrinks. So all other things being equal, volatility is minimized in
the portfolio.
If we graph the return rates and standard deviations for a collection of securities, and for all
portfolios we can get by allocating among them. Markowitz showed that we get a region
bounded by an upward-sloping curve, which he called the efficient frontier.
It's clear that for any given value of standard deviation, we would like to choose a portfolio that
gives you the greatest possible rate of return; so we always want a portfolio that lies up along the
efficient frontier, rather than lower down, in the interior of the region. This is the first important
property of the efficient frontier: it's where the best portfolios are.
The second important property of the efficient frontier is that it's curved, not straight.
If we take a 50/50 allocation between two securities, assuming that the year-to-year performance
of these two securities is not perfectly in sync -- that is, assuming that the great years and the
lousy years for Security 1 don't correspond perfectly to the great years and lousy years for
Security 2, but that their cycles are at least a little off -- then the standard deviation of the 50/50
allocation will be less than the average of the standard deviations of the two securities separately.
Graphically, this stretches the possible allocations to the left of the straight line joining the two
securities
When all yields react similarly - the portfolio's variance will equal the
A Portfolio manager evaluates his portfolio performance and identifies the sources of strengths
and weakness. The evaluation of the portfolio provides a feed back about the performance to
evolve better management strategy. Even though evaluation of portfolio performance is
considered to be the last stage of investment process, it is a continuous process. There are
number of situations in which an evaluation becomes necessary and important.
Sharpes ratio
Treynors ratio
Jensens alpha
Sharpes ratio
A ratio developed by Nobel Laureate William F. Sharpe to measure risk-adjusted performance. It
is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate from the rate of return for a portfolio and dividing
the result by the standard deviation of the portfolio returns.
The Sharpe ratio tells us whether the returns of a portfolio are due to smart investment decisions
or a result of excess risk. This measurement is very useful because although one portfolio or fund
can reap higher returns than its peers, it is only a good investment if those higher returns do not
come with too much additional risk. The greater a portfolio's Sharpe ratio, the better its riskadjusted performance has been.
Treynors ratio
The Treynor ratio is a measurement of the returns earned in excess of that which could have
been earned on a risk less investment.
The Treynor ratio is also called reward-to-volatility ratio. It relates excess return over the riskfree rate to the additional risk taken; however systematic risk instead of total risk is used. The
higher the Treynor ratio, the better is the performance under analysis.
Treynors ratio = (Average Return of the Portfolio - Average Return of the Risk-Free Rate) / Beta
of the Portfolio
Like the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio (T) does not quantify the value added, if any, of active
portfolio management. It is a ranking criterion only. A ranking of portfolios based on the Treynor
Ratio is only useful if the portfolios under consideration are sub-portfolios of a broader, fully
diversified portfolio. If this is not the case, portfolios with identical systematic risk, but different
total risk, will be rated the same.
Jensens alpha
An alternative method of ranking portfolio management is Jensen's alpha, which quantifies the
added return as the excess return above the security market line in the capital asset pricing
model. Jensen's alpha (or Jensen's Performance Index) is used to determine the excess return of a
stock, other security, or portfolio over the security's required rate of return as determined by the
Capital Asset Pricing Model. This model is used to adjust for the level of beta risk, so that riskier
securities are expected to have higher returns. The measure was first used in the evaluation of
mutual fund managers by Michael Jensen in the 1970's.
To calculate alpha, the following inputs are needed:
The recent CBI probe into the operations of many market dealers has revealed the unscrupulous
practices by banks, dealers and brokers in their portfolio operations. The SEBI has then imposed
stricter rules, which included their registration, a code of conduct and minimum infrastructure,
experience and expertise etc.
The guidelines of SEBI are in the direction of making portfolio management a responsible
professional service to be rendered by experts in the field.
PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS
Portfolio analysis includes portfolio construction, selection of securities,
revision of portfolio evaluation and monitoring the performance of the portfolio. All these are
part of subject of portfolio management which is a dynamic concept. Individual securities have
risk-return characteristics of their own. Portfolios, which are combinations of securities may or
Traditional approach
Modern approach
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Traditional approach was based on the fact that risk could be measured on each individual
security through the process of finding out the standard deviation and that security should be
chosen where the deviation was the lowest. Traditional approach believes that the market is
inefficient and the fundamental analyst can take advantage for the situation. Traditional
approach is a comprehensive financial plan for the individual. It takes into account the
individual needs such as housing, life insurance and pension plans.
Traditional approach basically deals with two major decisions. They are
a.
b.
MODERN APPROACH
Modern approach theory was brought out by Markowitz and Sharpe. It is the combination
of securities to get the most efficient portfolio. Combination of securities can be made in many
ways. Markowitz developed the theory of diversification through scientific reasoning and
method. Modern portfolio theory believes in the maximization of return through a combination
of securities. The modern approach discusses the relationship between different securities and
then draws inter-relationships of risks between them. Markowitz gives more attention to the
process of selecting the portfolio. It does not deal with the individual needs.
CHAPTER-3
COMPANY PROFILE
COMPANY PROFILE
India Bulls Financial Services is one of Indias leading and fastest growing financial services
firms. It is a major player in the capital markets dealing with securities broking, margin lending,
depository services, equity research services, and commodities trading. It also provides credit
services like loan against shares, mortgage and consumer finance. It is constantly tapping new
India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. (IBFSL) established one of the first in-house developed
trading platforms in India. It expanded its service offerings to include Equity, F&O, wholesale
Debt, Mutual fund, IPO distribution and Equity Research. It ventured into Insurance distribution
and commodities trading. It has always focused on brand building and the franchise model for
expanding its business. It came out with its Initial Public Offer (IPO) in September 2004 and it
gradually emerged as a market leader in securities brokerage industry with 43% of online share
trading. In the financial year 2006-07 it was included in the prestigious Morgan Stanley Capital
International Index (MSCI).
India Bulls Financial Services Ltd has given us an opportunity to do an internship project for the
company. The goals of this project have been clearly defined. The various goals are as follows,
Client acquisition
Revenue generation
Mapping the Risk Profile of Clients
Coordination with the back office
Client servicing and Retention
Understanding the Media Sector
Studying the patterns of the derivatives market
Global forces will continue to affect everyones business and personal life.
Technology will continue to advance and amaze us.
There will be a continuing push toward deregulation of the economic sector.
These three developments globalization, technological advances, and deregulation spell endless
opportunities. Globalization is characterized by the increases in the flow of goods and services,
capital, technology and information, as well as the mobility of individuals across borders. In
simple terms it is the integration of one country with the rest of the world in all economic
spheres. The process of globalization can be seen in terms of trade in goods and services, trade in
finance and Foreign Direct Investment. Since 1990, Indias financial system has become more
exposed to the global bonding of the financial, IT and telecommunications industries whose
linkages keep widening, deepening and growing. Indias fitful, ambivalent attempts at
privatization and opening to private participation in the provision of infrastructure services have
also contributed to reciprocal intrusions with the global financial system impinging on Indias
capital markets and vice-versa. The dotcom and telecom bubbles have burst, but the financial
connections they created have remained intact. One outcome has been the creeping but relentless
internationalization of Indias financial system, regardless of domestic popular or political
preferences. The choice of a sheltered domestically protected alternative to a globally connected
financial system no longer exists.
India emerges from autarchic isolation into unwitting global prominence, its key systems
political, economic, social, financial, institutional and markets consumer, producer, commodity,
factor and financial are being exposed to the hot influences of globalization some subtle, others
quite rampantly in-your-face. Being perhaps the most tactile, open and nonphysical, Indias
financial system and market have felt the earliest and greatest pressure to accommodate and
adapt to globalization more quickly than other systems and markets.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
1. Prof. P. V. Narasimham
2. Shri V. Shankar
Managing Director
3. Dr. S. D. Israni
4. Dr. M. Y. Khan
5. Mr. P. J. Mathew
Shareholder Director
6. M. C. Rodrigues
Shareholder Director
Shareholder Director
Shareholder Director
9. Mr. K. D. Gupta
Shareholder Director
Shareholder Director
CHAPTER-4
DATA ANALYSIS
DATA ANALYSIS
Calculation of return of ICICI
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
Ending
price(Rs)
Dividend(Rs)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
141.45
297.90
375.00
587.70
892.00
295.45
371.35
585.05
891.5
1238.7
7.50
7.50
8.50
8.50
10.00
Table 4.1
Return = Dividend + (Ending Price-Beginning price) 100
Beginning Price
= 114.17%
= 27.17%
* 100
= 58.28%
= 53.13%
= 39.98%
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Beginning
Price
358.5
645.9
771
1195
1630
Ending price
Dividend
645.55
769.05
1207
1626.9
2877.75
3
3.50
4.50
5.50
7.00
Table 4.2
Return
Return (2005)
3+(645.55-358.5)
358.5
* 100
= 80.9%
Return (2006)
= 19.60%
Return (2007)
4.50+(1207-771)
771
= 57.13%
Return (2008)
5.00+(1626.9-1195) * 100
1195.9
Return (2009)
7.00+(2877.75-1630) * 100
1630
= 76.97%
* 100
36.6%
Beginning
price(Rs)
Ending
price(Rs)
Dividend(Rs)
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
667
990
1318.95
142
176.5
983.5
1310.75
142.1
176.1
209.45
15
20
31.80
2.65
3.10
Table 4.3
Return
Return(2005)
15 + (983.5-667)
667
Return(2006) =
20+ (1310.75-990)
990
* 100
*100
49.7%
34.4%
Return(2007)
31+ (142.1-1318.95)*100 =
1318.95
Return(2008)
86.87%
25.8%
3.10+(209.45-176.5) *100 =
176.5
20.45
142
Return(2009)
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
Ending
price(Rs)
Dividend(Rs)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
133.65
161.5
179.2
270.5
390.9
159.7
179.1
269.15
388.45
382.1
6.75
6.75
7.25
6.00
11.25
Table 4.4
Return
Return(2005)
Return(2006) =
6.75+(159.7-133.65)
133.65
6.75+ (179.1-161.5) *
161.5
* 100
100
= 24.5%
= 13.58
Return(2007)
7.25+(269.15-179.2)
179.2
* 100
= 54.2
Return(2008)
6.00+(388.45-270.5) * 100
270.5
= 45.8
Return(2009)
11.25+(382.1-390.9) * 100
390.9
= 0.62
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
Ending
price(Rs)
Dividend(Rs)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
898.00
1334.00
320.00
447.95
251.5
1371.05
317.8
448
251.35
212.65
10.00
3.00
3.50
2.00
2.00
Table 4.5
Return
Return(2005)
10.00+(1375.05-898.00) * 100 =
898.00
Return(2006)
3.00+(317.8-1334.00) * 100
1334
54.23%
= -75.95%
Return(2007)
3.50+(448-320.00)
320
Return(2008)
2.00+(251.35-447.95) * 100
447.95
Return(2009)
* 100
2.00+(212.65-251.5) * 100
251.5
41.09%
= -43.44%
= -14.65%
Year
Beginning
price(Rs)
Ending
price(Rs)
Dividend(Rs)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
598.45
1109.00
1268
363
391
1095.25
1251.15
362.75
391.8
425.5
15.00
17.00
14.50
8.50
8.50
Table 4.6
Return
Return(2005)
15.00+(1095.25-598.45) * 100
598..45
85.52%
Return(2006)
17.00+(1251.15-1109.00) * 100
1109
14.35%
Return(2007) =
14.50+(362.75-1268.00) * 100
1268.00
-70.24%
Return(2008) =
8.50+(391.8-363) * 100
363
10.27%
Return(2009) =
8.50+(425.5-391.00) * 100
391.00
10.99%
Year
Return (R)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
114.7
27.17
58.28
53.13
39.98
293.26
_
R
58.652
58.652
58.652
58.652
58.652
_
R-R
56.048
-31.482
-0.372
-5.522
-18.672
Table 4.7
_
Average (R) =
Variance =
Standard Deviation =
R
N
= 293.26 = 58.65
5
_
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Variance
1
4 (11905.379)
_
( R-R )2
3486.6
991.11
0.138384
30.492
348.64
4856.98
34.846
Year
Return (R)
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
80.9
19.60
57.13
36.6
76.97
271.2
_
R
_
R-R
_
( R-R )2
54.24
54.24
54.24
54.24
54.24
26.66
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
710.75
1199.92
8.3521
311.16
516.65
2476.8
Table 4.8
_
Average (R) = R = 271.2 = 54.24
N
Variance =
_
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Standard Deviation =
Variance
1 (2476.8)
5-1
24.88
Year
_
R
Return
(R)
49.7
34.4
-86.87
25.8
20.4
43.43
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
_
R-R
8.686
8.686
8.686
8.686
8.686
_
( R-R )2
41.04
25.714
-95.556
17.114
11.714
1682.14
661.209
9130.94
293.88
137.21
11905.379
Table 4.9
_
Average (R) = R
N
Variance =
Standard Deviation
S.D
43.43
5
_
1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Variance
1
(11905.379)
5-1
= 8.686
54.55
Year
Return
(R)
24.5
13.58
54.2
45.8
0.62
138.7
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
R-R
( R-R )2
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
27.74
-3.24
-14.16
26.46
18.06
-27.12
10.5
200.5
700.13
326.16
735.5
1972.79
Table 4.10
__
Average R =
R
N
variance
Standard Deviation
138.7 = 27.74
5
1
n-1
_
(R-R )2
Variance
1 (1972.79)
4
22.2
Year
Return (R)
2005
54.23
_
R
-7.744
_
R-R
61.974
_
( R-R )2
3840
2006
-75.95
-7.744
-68.206
4652
2007
41.09
-7.744
48.834
2384
2008
-43.44
-7.744
-35.696
1274
2009
-14.65
-7.744
-6.906
47.692
-38.72
12197.692
Table 4.11
_
Average (R) = R
N
Variance
= -38.72 = -7.744
5
_
= 1/n-1 (R-R)2
Standard Deviation =
Variance
=
=
1 (12197.692)
4
55.22
Year
Return (R)
2005
2006
2007
85.52
14.35
-70.24
_
R
10.18
10.18
10.18
_
R-R
75.34
4.17
-80.42
_
( R-R )2
5676
17.39
6467
2008
2009
10.27
10.99
50.89
10.18
10.18
0.09
0.81
0.0081
0.6561
12161
Table 4.12
_
Average (R) = R = 50.89 = 10.18
N
5
Variance
Standard Deviation
_
= 1 (R-R) 2
n-1
Variance
1
4
(12161)
55.13
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
DEVIATIONOFHDFC
___
RA-RA
DEVIATION OF ICICI
__
RB-RB
26.66
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
56.048
-31.482
-0.372
-5.522
-18.672
COMBINED DEVIATION
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
1494.24
1090.5
-1.075
97.41
-424.4
2256.675
Table 4.13
n
__
__
Co-variance (COVAB ) = 1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
451.335
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
451.335
(24.88) (34.846)
0.5206
DEVIATIONOF ITC
Year
___
RA-RA
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Table 4.14
41.04
25.714
-95.556
17.114
11.714
DEVIATION OF
COLGATEPALMOLIVE
__
RB-RB
-3.24
-14.16
26.46
18.06
-27.12
COMBINED DEVIATION
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
-132.97
-364.1
-2528.4
309.07
-317.68
-3034.08
n
__
__
Co-variance (COVAB ) = 1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
Co-variance(COVAB )
= 1/5 (-3034.08)
= -606.816
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
= -
606.816
(54.55) (22.21)
= - 0.5008
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
DEVIATION 0F
CIPLA
___
RA-RA
61.974
-68.206
48.834
-35.696
-6.906
DEVIATION OF
RANBAXI
__
RB-RB
75.34
4.17
-80.42
0.09
0.81
Table 4.15
Co-variance (COVAB )
n
__
__
= 1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
COMBINED DEVIATION
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
4669.12
-284.42
-3927.23
-3.213
-5.59
448.667
Co-variance(COVAB )
= 1/5 (448.667)
= 89.7334
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
89.7334
(55.22)(55.13)
= 0.0295
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
DEVIATION OF
CIPLA
___
RA-RA
61.974
-68.206
48.834
-35.696
-6.906
DEVIATION OF HDFC
COMBINED DEVIATION
__
RB-RB
26.06
-34.64
2.89
-17.64
22.73
___
___
(RA-RA ) (RB-RB)
1615.04
2362.66
141.13
629.68
-156.97
4591.54
Table 4.16
Co-variance (COVAB )
Co-variance(COVAB )
n
__
__
= 1/n (RA-RA) (RB-RB)
t=1
= 1/5 (4591.54)
=
918.31
COV AB
(Std. A) (Std. B)
=
918.31
(55.22) (24.88)
0.668
STANDARD DEVIATION
COMPANY
STANDARED DEVIATION
ITC
COLEGATEPALMOLIVE
HDFC
ICICI
RANBAXY
CIPLA
Table 4.17
54.55
22.21
24.88
34.846
55.13
55.22
.
Graph 4.1
AVERAGE
COMPANY
AVERAGE
ITC
8.686
COLGATE&PALMOLIVE
HDFC
ICICI
RANBAXY
CIPLA
27.74
54.24
58.652
10.18
-7.744
Table 4.18
Graph 4.2
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
COMPANY
HDFC&ICICI
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXY
CIPLA&HDFC
0.5206
0.5008
0.0295
0.668
Table 4.19
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
HDFC&ICICI
Formula
Xa
(Std.b) 2
p ab (std.a ) (std.b)
(std.a) + (std.b) 2 - 2 pab (std.a) (std.b)
2
Xb
Where X a
1Xa
=
HDFC
ICICI
Std.a
24.88
Std.b
34.85
p ab
= 0.5206
Xa
(34.85) 2
Xb
1Xa
Xa
0.8199
Xb
0.1801
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
ITC&COLGATE
Formula:
Xa
(Std.b) 2
p ab (std.a ) (std.b)
(std.a) + (std.b) - 2 pab (std.a) (std.b)
2
Xb
Where X a
Std.a
1Xa
=
ITC
COLGATE
54.55
Std.b
22.21
p ab
0.5008
Xa
Xb
1Xa
Xa
0.0503
Xb
0.9497
PORTFOLIO WEIGHTS
CIPLA&RANBAXY
Formula
Xa
(Std.b) 2
p ab (std.a ) (std.b)
(std.a) + (std.b) - 2 pab (std.a) (std.b)
2
Xb
Where X a
1Xa
=
CIPLA
RANBAXY
Std.a
Std.b
=
=
55.22
55.13
p ab
0.0295
Xa =
Xb =
Xa
0.49916
Xb
0.50084
Two Portfolios
Correlation
Coefficient
COMPANY Xa
COMPANY Xb
PORTFOLIO
RETURN Rp
PORTFOLO
RISK
p
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
0.5206
0.5008
0.605
0.8199
0.0563
0.49916
..0.1801
0.9497
0.50084
114.24
26.835
1.2335
Table 4.20
PORTFOLIO RETURN
PORTFOLIO RISK=
__
__
( Rp)=(Ra)(Xa) + (Rb) (Xb)
___________________________________
p =
X1^21^2+X2^22^2+2(X1)(X2)(X12)12
31.14
22.77
49.43
Portfolio return Rp
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
114.24
26.835
1.234
Table 4.21
.
Graph 4.3
Portfolio risk
ICICI&HDFC
ITC&COLGATE
CIPLA&RANBAXI
Table 4.22
Graph 4.4
31.14
22.77
49.43
CHAPTER-5
FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS
AND
SUGGESSIONS
FINDINGS
As the study shows the following findings for portfolio construction
Investor would be able to achieve when the returns of shares and debentures
Investors may invest their money for long run as the both combinations are most suitable
portfolios.
A rational investor would constantly examine his chosen portfolio both for average
return and risk.
CONCLUSION
ICICI&HDFC
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in HDFC when
compared to ICICI as the risk involved in HDFC is less than ICICI as the
standard deviation of HDFC is less than that of ICICI.
The combination of ITC and COLGATE gives the proportion of investment is 0.0563
and 0.50084 for ITC and COLGATE, based on the standard deviations The standard
deviation for ITC is 54.55 and for COLGATE is 22.2.
Hence the investor should invest their funds more in COLGATE when compared to ITC
as the risk involved in COLGATE is less than ITC as the standard deviation of
COLGATE is less than that of ITC.
CIPLA&RANBAXY
to
both the risk is almost same, hence the risk is same when invested in either of the
security.
SUGGESTIONS
Buy stock with a disparity and discrepancy between the situation of the firm and the
Dont put your trust in only one investment. It is like putting all eggs in one basket.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
1.
V.K.BHALLA
Website
4.WWW. Investopedia.com
5.www.nseindia.com
6.www.bseindia.com.
Newspapers& magazine
7. DAILY NEWS PAPERS.ECONOMIC TIMES, FINANCIAL EXPRESS