Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V.R.Prasath Kumar
Assistant Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering,
SRM University.
This experimental study aims to investigate the suitability of fly ash and egg shell powder as partial replacement for fine aggregate in the production of low-cost
and light weight concrete. In this experimental study
is an attempt to find the optimum usage of fly ash and
egg shell powder in normal concrete by replacing the
river sand (7%,14%,21%,28% & 35%) by weight at various
proportions.
The present scenario demands identification of cheaper and locally available substitute materials for the river
sand for making concrete which is environment friendly solution for the fast depleting and excessively mined
river sand and lead to an overall reduction in construction cost for sustainable development.The quantity of
fly ash produced from thermal power plants in India is
approximately 80 million tons each year, and its percentage utilization is less than 10%. Majority of fly ash
produced is of Class F type.
Keywords:
Abstract:
1. Introduction:
In India, the most widely used fine aggregate for construction is the natural river sand mined from the riverbeds. However, the availability of river sand for the
preparation of concrete is becoming scarce, due to
the excessive non scientific methods of mining from
the riverbeds, lowering of water table, sinking of the
bridge piers, etc.
Due to the depletion of river bed it has also become
expensive. The high and increasing cost of these materials has greatly hindered the development of shelter and other infrastructural facilities in developing
countries.
February 2015
Page 214
c)To study the effect of fly ash and egg shell powder
for various mix proportions.
d)To provide economical construction material.
e)Use of fly ash and egg shell powder by partially sand
replacement in normal concrete for real time projects
thereby reducing the overall cost of construction.
f)Reduction in mining river sand helps protecting the
ground water table.
g)The effective way of utilizing waste material leads to
clean environment.
3. Experimental Program:
3.1 Materials:
3.1.1 Cement:
The cement used for the present experimental investigation was ordinary Portland cement of 53 grade, conforming to IS: 122691987. The various characteristics
of cement were tested as per the Indian Standards IS:
4031 1988. Specific Gravity of the cement was 3.15.
February 2015
Page 215
February 2015
Page 216
For each mix, the required quantities of the constituents were batched by weight. The mix design is produced for maximum size of aggregate is 20mm conventional aggregate FA and ESP with replacement of
fine aggregate. The replacement of FA and ESP respectively and combinely with fine aggregate by 7%, 14%, 21%
,28% and 35% is studied by casting cubes, cylinders and
beams.
The concrete is prepared in laboratory. The concrete is
poured into the mould in 3 layers by poking with tamping rod. The cast specimens are removed after 24 hours
and these are immersed in a water tank. After curing 7
& 28 days the specimens are removed and these are
tested for Compression, Split and Flexural strength as
shown in fig.1, fig.2 and fig. 3 respectively, and the results compared with conventional concrete.
February 2015
Page 217
February 2015
Page 218
3. Compressive strength was higher than normal concrete for 21% FA and ESP replacement at 7 and 28 days
of curing ages. FA and ESP replacements greater than
28% (M30) and 21% (M40) had lower strength than normal concrete at the same time weight of the cubes are
reduced up to 7% per cube.
4. Split tensile strength of FA and ESP concrete were
comparable with normal concrete up to 35% FA and
ESP replacement. However, concrete with 14% FA and
ESP had lower split tensile strength than normal concrete at both the mixes.
Fig. 8 Flexural strength for 7 & 28 days (M30)
5. Flexural strength of FA and ESP concrete were comparable with normal concrete up to 35% FA and ESP
replacement. However, concrete with 14% FA and ESP
had lower flexural strength than normal concrete at
both the mixes.
6. Results of this investigation suggest that fly ash and
egg shell powder could be very conveniently used in
structural concrete.
References:
1. Rafat Siddique, Effect of fine aggregate replacement with class F fly ash on the mechanical properties
of concrete, cement and concrete research, 33 (2003)
539-547.
Fig. 9 Flexural strength for 7 & 28 days (M40)
5. Conclusions :
The following conclusions can be drawn from the present investigation.
1. Compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and
flexural strength of fine aggregate partially replaced
with FA and ESP concrete specimens were higher than
the normal concrete specimens at 7 and 28 days. The
strength differential between the FA and ESP concrete
specimens and normal concrete specimens became
more distinct after 28 days.
2. Compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and
flexural strength of fine aggregate partially replaced
with FA and ESP concrete continued to increase at certain level at 7 and 28 days.
February 2015
Page 219
6. Sathanantham.T, Partially repalcement of fine aggregate by rice husk & egg shell in concrete, International journal of innovative research & studies, ISSN
2319-9725, Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2014.
7. K.Uma shankar J & H.V.Balaji, Experimental analysis
on effective utilization of industrial waste materials of
egg shell, GGBS and saw dust ash, International journal of management, information technology & engineering, Volume 2, Issue 1,Jan 2014.
8. Anu Paul, Anumol V S, Fathima Moideen, Jiksymol K
Jose, Alka Abraham, Studies on Improvement of Clayey Soil Using Egg Shell Powder and Quarry Dust Journal of Engineering Research and Applications ISSN :
2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 4( Version 4), April 2014.
9. Khusbu Rajhans, Proff. C. R. Sharma, Studies on concrete characteristic strength using fly ash and rice husk
ash, International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications, ISSN: 2248-9622, Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2014.
10. M.S. SHETTY (1982) Concrete Technology, Sultan
Chand Publication, 2nd edition.
11. ACI Committee 211.1-91 (1991), Standard Practice for
Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight and
Mass Concrete. Detroit, American Concrete Institute.
12. Concrete technology by A.M.NEVILLE.
13. Concrete technology by M.L.GAMBHIR.
14. Indian Standard Recommended Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design IS: 10262 1982.
Author Details:
V.R.Prasath Kumar
Assistant Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering,
SRM University.
15. Indian Standard Recommended Guidelines for Cement IS: 456 1978.
16. IS 383:1970 Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete.
17. IS 4031(Part 6):1988 Methods of physical tests for
hydraulic cement: Part 6 Determination of compressive strength of hydraulic cement.
18. IS 9013:1978 Method of making, curing and determining compressive strength of accelerated cured concrete test specimens.
February 2015
Page 220