Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interpreting Literature
Many people are wary of interpreting literature. They see interpretation as arbitrary,
arcane, and possibly fraudulent, as something teachers do to baffle students. However,
we all interpret as we read. To read (at least with understanding and appreciation) is
to interpret.
Interpretation includes a number of different things readers do. Most commonly,
people think that to interpret is to decode meanings hidden in the writing by the
author. The question asked is, "What did the author really mean?" This question
shows a simplistic understanding of what imaginative writing is and how literature
works. Other areas of this map discuss the writing process and how it leads to
discovery.
Here, I want to
discuss the
reader's role in
relation to the
writer and the
text.
UNIVERSITY OF EL SALVADOR
SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
FOREIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT
The world of The Lord of the Rings affected Tolkien and, as the world developed, it
guided his work in completing the novel. Tolkien's letters show this reciprocal
influence between him and his unfolding imaginary world.
I cite this work of fantasy because it clearly shows how the writer creates a world that
in turn affects him or her.
UNIVERSITY OF EL SALVADOR
SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
FOREIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY OF EL SALVADOR
SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
FOREIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT
I want to emphasize that both understanding and meaning can, and often do, come
before explanation and interpretation. Explaining and interpreting make clear and
explicit what may only be implied as one reads with understanding. People often
mistakenly assume that one must be able to explain and interpret a text before it has
meaning.
Surplus Meaning
Since literature is symbolic, its meaning is not simple or single. Because of the nature
of symbols, literature has what is sometimes called "surplus meaning": one can never
really exhaust or completely state the meaning of a piece of literature. Another
reading, or another reader, will produce new meanings, or new shades of meaning.
Surplus meaning does not imply that a literary text can mean anything at all. Although
the limits to what a text can mean are vague, those limits do exist. They are
established by discussion among readers of the text, by the text itself, and by its
cultural and historical context. A reader must be able to convince other readers of the
validity and reliability of his or her interpretation. Even so, not all readers will agree.
While the surplus or multiple meanings of literary texts may frustrate those who want
single, clear meanings, in fact surplus meaning should excite readers, since it opens
the text to reading, rereading, and discussion that continually develop insight and
meaning.
Sometimes what is meant by interpretation is "mapping" features of the text onto
features of another system of ideas. For instance, some literary critics map texts onto
Freudian psychology, or onto existential philosophy. Using the Pentad* or the
Pollution Cycle can be seen as this kind of mapping.
If the author intended such a mapping of his or her text onto another set of ideas or
events, the text itself is an allegory. Any text may be read allegorically by a clever
reader; however, unless the author's intent was allegorical, such interpretations can
be very misleading). An example of Biblical allegory, for instance, may be found in
Ezekiel 17 or Hosea 1-3.
Conclusion
The meaning of a piece of literature resides in the reader's freedom to respond.
Discussion of literature assumes a community of those discussing the poem, novel,
essay, story or whatever. For a reader's response to be more than idiosyncratic, the
reader must engage in dialogue with other readers of that piece of literature. The
dialogue may be face to face, it may be electronic, or it may be in print. For a reader's
understanding of a piece of literature to succeed, it must survive in the continuing
dialogue of readers.
UNIVERSITY OF EL SALVADOR
SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES
FOREIGN LANGUAGE DEPARTMENT
ANNEX
*The Pentad is organized in five sets of questions (i.e., Action, Actor-Agent, Scene,
Means, and Purpose), which cover the major content areas of literary analysis.
BURKES PENTAD
Action:
Actor-Agent:
Scene:
Means:
Purpose:
What happened?
What is happening?
What will happen? What could happen?
What is it? (e.g., an act of revenge, justice, blind chance)
Why?
Why not?(What did the agent want to accomplish and why did
he/she/it have to use this approach to achieve the purpose? Why
not do it another way?)