Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 15-4444
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00212-FDW-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Miguel
Eloiza
Arellano
appeals
the
revocation
of
his
Arellano
the
Petition
for
Warrant
for
Offender
Under
We affirm.
reasonable
time
after
the
parolee
is
taken
into
Morrissey v.
United States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829, 831 (4th Cir. 1992).
The
Supreme Court has also stated that, because the loss of liberty
as a parole violator does not occur until the parolee is taken
into custody, there is no constitutional duty to provide [the
parolee]
an
adversary
parole
hearing
until
he
is
taken
into
87-89 (1976).
Rule
32.1
requires
that
court
hold
the
revocation
Arellano argues
that
delay
of
approximately
six
(6)
years
and
seven
(7)
Government
constitutional
right
contends
to
an
Arellano
adversarial
did
not
hearing
have
until
he
a
was
Indeed,
also
have
concluded
that
the
revocation
Other
hearing
conditions
United
States
of
v.
his
probation
Pardue,
363
or
F.3d
supervised
695,
698
release.
(8th
Cir.
See
2004)
charges,
no
undue
federal
occurred.);
requirements
revocation
and
hearing
time
must
limitations
be
adhered
to
applicable
only
to
after
the
Arellano