Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/
of Family Issues
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Journal of Family Issues can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://jfi.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://jfi.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://jfi.sagepub.com/content/31/11/1530.refs.html
Consequences of
Filial Support for
Two Generations:
A Narrative and
Quantitative Review
Eva-Maria Merz1,2,
Hans-Joachim Schulze2,
and Carlo Schuengel2
Abstract
This narrative and quantitative review synthesizes findings from 55 (N = 54,550)
studies on the association between providing support to elderly parents and
well-being of adult children as well as well-being of parents, in an endeavor
to determine the prevailing direction of effects, magnitude of effects, and
possible factors that may moderate these effects. The relation between caring
for an elderly parent and well-being and/or caregiver burden in adult
children was found to be insubstantial. Likewise, being cared for by adult
children was found to be weakly related to well-being in elderly parents.
More complex models including psychological aspects of caring; aspects of
the intergenerational relationship, such as quality; and the inclusion of both
the adult childs and the parents perspectives on providing and receiving
support appear more promising for understanding caregiving and well-being
in intergenerational relationships beyond childhood.
Keywords
intergenerational solidarity, well-being, caregiver burden, meta-analysis
1
Corresponding Author:
Eva-Maria Merz, Department of Social Demography, Netherlands Interdisciplinary
Demographic Institute, PO Box 11650, 2502AR The Hague, Netherlands
Email: Merz@nidi.nl
1531
Merz et al.
1532
norms concerning family care can vary among different cultural backgrounds
(e.g., Fuligni & Pedersen, 2002; Kwak, 2003).
Method
Literature Search
The studies included in the present meta-analysis were identified from the
psychological, sociological/gerontological, and medical literature through
the electronic databases Web of Science (Social Sciences and Arts and
Humanities citation indices), ERIC (Education Resources Information
Center), MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and SocIndex (Sociology citation Index) in the time period 1945 to 2007, using the following
keywords: intergenerational support AND well(-)being (100 results),
intergenerational solidarity AND well(-)being (26 results), (parent)
care AND well(-)being (772 results), parent care AND adult children
(934 results), caring AND well(-)being (139 results), caregiving AND
well(-)being (660 results), social support AND burden (983 results),
intergenerational support AND burden (18 results) or filial maturity
(23 results), filial maturity AND well(-)being (7 results), elderly parents
AND adult children (218 results), and caregiver burden (1,530 results).
Furthermore, the reference lists of the retrieved articles were checked on
relevant studies.
1533
Merz et al.
focused on caring and well-being in a broader range of roles (children, parents, partners, brothers, or sisters; Pinquart & Srensen, 2003, 2004, 2005,
2006), only studies investigating caregiving and receiving in adult child
parent dyads were included. Consequently, studies reporting spousal or other
familial caring relationships were excluded from our review. Studies on professional caregiving were also excluded from this meta-analysis. Fourth,
studies had to describe original quantitative research and include sufficient
data to determine effect sizes. Moreover, the studies had to be published in
English. Finally, to establish a minimum study quality (Wortman, 1994), only
studies published in scientific, peer-reviewed journals were included in the
meta-analysis. If there were more than one study based on the same sample,
only one report was included in the analyses (e.g., Ingersoll-Dayton, Starrels,
& Dowler, 1996; Starrels et al., 1997; Zhan, 2005, 2006). Of all reviewed
studies, 55 satisfied the above-mentioned criteria and were included in our
review. Publication years of these studies ranged between 1981 and 2007.
Coding Procedure
A detailed coding scheme was used to record the following study characteristics: country, design, sample size, predominant sex of sample, mean age of
both the parent and child generation, cultural background of the respondents
(Western vs. non-Western), effect size type (bivariate vs. multivariate), and
marital status. The kind of care the older generation received from their adult
children was differentiated into instrumental and emotional care.
All studies included in the statistical meta-analytic procedure were coded
by the first author. The second and the third authors each coded 10 studies, of
which 5 were the same. In other words, 5 studies were coded by all three
authors, 10 by the first and second authors, and 10 by the first and third
authors. The remaining studies were coded by the first author. Following the
coding procedure an interrater reliability check (Cohens k or intraclass correlations) was performed. Reliability coefficients ranged from k = .77 to 1.0
and r = .88 to 1.
1534
Statistical Analyses
A meta-analytic approach with a fixed-effects model (Hedges & Vevea, 1998)
was used to examine the combined effect sizes of studies investigating the
association between care and well-being of the parent generation on one hand
and caring and well-being of the child generation on the other hand. The correlation coefficient (r) was chosen as the effect size statistic. If a study did not
include adequate effect size statistics but reported that there was no significant effect, the effect size was conservatively estimated as p = .50 (Lipsey &
Wilson, 2001; Mullen, 1989). The resulting effect sizes were inserted in the
statistical package Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2; Borenstein,
Rothstein, & Cohen, 2000). Combined effect sizes were calculated by weighting each study as a function of sample size (Mullen, 1989; Rosenthal, 1991).
The overall statistics were computed by combining data across outcomes and
treating these as independent. Differences between groups of effect sizes (i.e.,
categories of a moderator) were interpreted as significant when the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) did not overlap. Whether the various effect sizes that
were averaged into an overall effect size all estimated the same population
effect sizes was investigated with tests of heterogeneity, performed with the
Q statistic (see Lipsey & Wilson, 2001) to determine whether exploratory
analyses including additional study characteristics as moderating factors
were necessary, using meta-analytical regression analysis.
Results
General Results Concerning Study Characteristics
Measures of well-being typically consist of a global assessment of various
aspects of a persons life (Diener, 1984). Well-being in most of the included
1535
Merz et al.
1536
1537
Concept
Well-Being
ES Reported
in Study
r = .07
r = .04
r = -.03
r = .26
r = .15
r = -.05
r = -.04
r = -.02
r = .02
r = .05
r = -.08
r = .03
r = .27
r = .14
r = -.02
r = -.01
r = .11
r = .02
r = -.05
r = -.06
r = .03
r = .04
r = .03
Correlation
Calculated
0.85
2.32*
-1.15
2.18*
4.94***
2.11*
-0.95
-0.67
0.40
1.13
1.02
1.14
2.60**
2.21*
-0.67
-0.67
2.23*
0.54
-0.89
-1.01
1.28
1.44
4.23***
Z Value
Study
N
Table 1. Association Between Receiving Care and Well-Being of the Parent Generation
-0.09 to 0.23
0.01 to 0.08
-0.09 to 0.02
0.03 to 0.47
0.09 to 0.21
0.004 to 0.11
-0.13 to 0.04
-0.06 to 0.03
-0.08 to 0.12
-0.03 to 0.13
-0.07 to 0.23
-0.02 to 0.08
0.07 to 0.46
0.02 to 0.26
-0.07 to 0.04
-0.05 to 0.03
0.01 to 0.21
-0.05 to 0.09
-0.16 to 0.06
-0.18 to 0.06
-0.02 to 0.08
-0.02 to 0.10
0.02 to 0.04
95% CI
1538
1539
Merz et al.
ES
Z Value
95% CI
Categorical
moderator
Positive 8
r = .06
4.93***
0.04 to 0.08
24.67**
conceptualization
well-being
Negative 8
r = -.01 0.58
-0.03 to 0.02
9.90
conceptualization
well-being
Combination 6
r = .03
2.06
-0.01 to 0.06
6.03
conceptualization
well-being
Continuous
moderator
% Married
14
r = .04
5.07***
0.03 to 0.06
26.16*
Point estimate -.00
-2.16*
-0.002 to -0.001
slope
Point estimate
.13
3.15**
0.04 to 0.20
intercept
Mean age
14
r = .04
4.12***
0.02 to 0.05
30.61**
Point estimate
.01
3.73***
0.01 to 0.02
slope
Point estimate -.71
-3.55*** -1.10 to -0.32
intercept
Note: CI = confidence interval.
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.
1540
1541
Negative
Negative
Negative
Combineda
Negative
Negative
Combined
Combined
Negative
Negative
Negative
Combined
Negative
Negative
Combined
Combined
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Positive
Combined
Combined
Cicirelli (1993)
Pruchno and Kleban (1993)
Starrels et al. (1997)
Marks (1998)
Carpenter (2001)
Schwarz et al. (2005)
Marks et al. (2002)
Llacer et al. (2002)
Umberson (1992)
Li and Seltzer (2003)
Gupta (2000)
Atienza and Stephens (2000)
Zhan (2002)
Amirkhanyan and Wolf (2003)
Stephens and Townsend (1997)
Choi and Marks (2006)
Loomis and Booth (1995)
Li, Seltzer, and Greenberg (1999)
Stephens et al. (2001)
Amirkhanyan and Wolf (2006)
Dwyer, Lee, and Jankowski (1994)
Spitze, Logan, Joseph, and Lee (1994)
Stephens, Franks, and Atienza (1997)
78
424
1,585
296
80
265
8,286
127
2,057
139
118
103
110
8,345
296
152
373
168
278
7,009
135
763
105
Concept
Well-Being
Study
N
Correlation
Calculated
r = .24
r = .08
r = .23
r = -.02
r = .17
r = .45
r = -.02
r = -.08
r = .02
r = .06
r = .32
r = -.30
r = -.15
r = -.01
r = -.22
r = -.14
r = -.01
r = .22
r = .24
r = .19
r = -.33
r = -.03
r = -.32
ES Reported
in Study
r = .24
r = .08
b = .23
p = .40
r = .17
b = .45
b = -.03
p = .38
p = .28
p = .50
b = .32
b = -.30
r = -.15
p = .50
r = -.22
p = .25
r = -.01
r = .22
b = .24
b = .19
b = -.33
p = .44
r = -.32
Table 3. Association Between Caring for an Older Parent and Well-Being of the Adult Child Generation
2.12*
1.81
9.32***
-0.25
1.24
7.79***
-1.92
-0.91
1.09
0.67
3.50***
-3.14**
-1.56
-0.67
-3.85***
-1.71
-0.12
2.87**
4.06***
15.75***
-3.89***
-0.77
-0.81
Z value
(continued)
0.02 to 0.44
-0.01 to 0.18
0.18 to 0.28
-0.13 to 0.10
-0.08 to 0.35
0.35 to 0.54
-0.04 to 0.00
-0.25 to -0.09
-0.02 to 0.07
-0.11 to 0.22
0.14 to 0.47
-0.47 to -0.12
-0.33 to 0.04
-0.03 to 0.01
-0.33 to -0.11
-0.29 to 0.02
-0.11 to 0.10
-0.36 to -0.07
0.13 to 0.35
0.16 to 0.21
0.17 to 0.47
-0.10 to 0.04
-0.27 to 0.11
95% CI
1542
4.17***
-1.57
-1.67
-0.43
-13.66***
0.16
-0.21
2.29*
2.90**
2.41*
1.50
0.67
Z value
r = .40
r = -.06
r = -.11
r = -.05
r = -.07
100
Negative
r = .40
818
Negative
b = -.06
252
Combined
b = -.11
95
Combined
b = -.05
31,644
r = .06
p = .50
r = .02
r = -.02
r = .20
r = .22
r =.14
r = .14
Correlation
Calculated
ES Reported
in Study
b = .02
b = -.02
r = .20
b = .22
b = .14
r = .14
112
110
130
171
297
112
Combined
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Combined
Negative
Concept
Well-Being
Study
N
Table 3. (continued)
0.22 to 0.55
-0.12 to 0.01
-0.23 to 0.02
-0.24 to 0.16
-0.09 to -0.06
-0.17 to 0.20
-0.21 to 0.17
0.03 to 0.36
0.07 to 0.36
0.03 to 0.25
-0.04 to 0.32
-0.11 to 0.23
95% CI
1543
Merz et al.
ES
Z Value
95% CI
Categorical
moderator
Negative
21
r = .09
13.98***
0.08 to 0.11
conceptualization
well-being
Combination
12
r = -.03 -3.39*** -0.05 to -0.01
conceptualization
well-being
Bivariate ES
14
r = -.15 -7.62*** -0.19 to -0.11
Multivariate ES
20
r = -.07 -12.04*** -0.08 to -0.06
Continuous
moderator
Publication year
34
r = -.07 -13.66*** -0.09 to -0.06
Point estimate -0.004
-3.38*** -0.007 to -0.002
slope
Point estimate
8.51
3.35***
3.54 to 13.50
intercept
23
r = -.04 -6.02*** -0.05 to -0.03
% Western
Point estimate -0.001
-3.91*** -0.003 to -0.001
slope
Point estimate
0.11
2.83***
0.03 to 0.19
intercept
% Female
29
r = -.05 -7.32*** -0.06 to -0.04
Point estimate -0.003
-9.17*** -0.005 to -0.003
slope
0.18
7.09***
0.14 to 0.24
Point estimate
intercept
Mean age
22
r = -.05 -7.25*** -0.06 to -0.04
Point estimate
0.003
3.23**
0.001 to 0.005
slope
Point estimate -0.22
-4.12*** -0.33 to -0.12
intercept
290.80***
27.20**
54.42***
282.45***
353.29***
173.05***
231.81***
210.28***
1544
Because some of the studies included in this meta-analysis did not provide
appropriate exact statistics, effect sizes had to be conservatively estimated as
probability level (p). Excluding those studies from the analyses provided a
similar small overall effect size of r = -.11 (p < .001) on a still heterogeneous
set of studies.
Discussion
It is reasonable to expect that giving care to elderly parents takes a toll on
childs well-being, whereas receiving care is associated with increased wellbeing for elderly parents. The results of our review support the notion that
caring for an elderly parent is associated with stress and depression in adult
children, but the effects are very small. Several studies suggested that the
burden of caring may be offset by individual characteristics, for example,
problem-focused coping with the stress of having a needy parent or relationship characteristics such as quality or attachment and positive views of the
parent, which leads to a satisfactory balance of the childrens and the parents
needs. Being cared for by adult children was likewise found to be weakly
related to well-being in elderly parents. Several studies suggested that the
benefits of receiving care may be offset by feelings of unwanted dependency
and loss of autonomy. Other studies focused on structural factors, such as
marital status or living situation, as possible moderators of the relation between
receiving care from adult children and well-being of the elderly parents.
Below, we elaborate on these findings, in particular on moderating factors in
the association between intergenerational care and well-being in parents and
adult children and offer some directions for future research.
1545
Merz et al.
& Reuter, 2006). Little is as yet known about the qualities of instrumental or
emotional support that determine their effectiveness in engendering feeling
support. Instrumental support, if timed well and contingent on the perceived
needs of the parents, may lift the spirits of a parent as much as support that is
entirely emotional or social in nature.
In addition to different types of care, this study also investigated care
recipient characteristics, including marital status and age. With regard to marital status of parents, our results mainly confirmed expectations, based on
earlier work. Parents with a partner benefited less from filial care than divorced
or widowed ones. Married parents may be able to direct their needs to their
partner and might be less dependent on their adult children. With respect to
age, it was found that older parents benefited more from filial support than
younger parents. It has been suggested that older persons are better capable
to integrate complex positive and negative emotions because of more experience and tolerance of ambiguity in later stages of the life span (Magai, 2001).
This might be an explanation for the fact that older people generally value
support from their adult offspring more than younger parents by trying to
maximize positive affect and dampen negative emotions.
Another significant moderating factor was the conceptualization of the
outcome variable well-being. Studies using mere positive conceptualizations
found significantly stronger effect sizes than studies including negative wellbeing measures. Diener (1984) pointed to the need of more rigorously defined
constructs referring to subjective well-being. In the current meta-analysis,
studies with negative, positive, and combined concepts of well-being were
integrated but produced different results. The concepts included depression,
positive and negative mood, life satisfaction, and affect balance but were all
referred to as well-being in the original studies. It seems imaginable that very
different interpretations are related to those concepts that might explain a part
of the heterogeneity found in the different sets of studies. It is also possible
that part of the stronger positive associations between received support and
positive well-being may be the result of bias to answer questions in the
positive direction. To resolve this issue, research including more than one
perspective on core variables or clearer operationalizations of core variables
is necessary.
1546
1547
Merz et al.
1548
Additionally, it would be interesting and fruitful to integrate both caregiver and care recipient reports on their well-being and exchange of care. The
perception of care received and provided and characteristics of the intergenerational relationship may differ for adult children and their parents because
of different feelings of overload and other commitments.
In summary, the current report offers a general review on the associations
between intergenerational support and well-being of adult child and parent
generations. Specifically, it provides support for the notion that providing
and receiving intergenerational care is not generally but conditionally related
to well-being. Given longevity, increasing numbers of older adults in modern
society, and growing demands on intergenerational support, work detailing
the particular patterns and consequences of filial support need to be key
topics in the social sciences.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship
and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this
article.
References
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analyses.
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1973). The development of infant-mother attachment. In
B. Caldwell & H. Ricciuti (Eds.), Review of child development research (3rd ed.,
pp. 1-94). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
*Amirkhanyan, A. A., & Wolf, D. A. (2003). Caregiver stress and noncaregiver stress:
Exploring the pathways of psychiatric morbidity. The Gerontologist, 43, 817-827.
*Amirkhanyan, A. A., & Wolf, D. A. (2006). Parent care and the stress process: Findings from panel data. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences
and Social Sciences, 61, S248-S255.
*Atienza, A. A., & Stephens, M. A. P. (2000). Social interactions at work and the
well-being of daughters involved in parent care. Journal of Applied Gerontology,
19, 243-263.
*Barber, C. E. (1988). Correlates of subjective burden among adult sons and daughters caring for aged parents. Journal of Aging Studies, 2, 133-144.
Berger, F., & Fend, H. (2005). Kontinuitt und Wandel in der affektiven Beziehung
zwischen Eltern und Kindern vom Jugend-bis ins Erwachsenenalter [Continuity
1549
Merz et al.
1550
Gabriel, B., & Bodenmann, G. (2006). Well being, marital and parenting satisfaction
in parents in association with child behavior. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 53, 213-225.
*Gupta, R. (2000). A path model of elder caregiver burden in Indian/Pakistani families in the United States. International Journal of Aging and Human Development,
51, 295-313.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in metaanalysis. Psychological Methods, 3, 486-504.
Ingersoll-Dayton, B., Starrels, M. E., & Dowler, D. (1996). Caregiving for parents
and parents-in-law: Is gender important? The Gerontologist, 36, 483-491.
Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Liebkind, K., Jaakkola, M., & Reuter, A. (2006). Perceived discrimination, social support networks, and psychological well-being. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 293-312.
*Kim, I. K., & Kim, C.-S. (2003). Patterns of family support and the quality of life of
the elderly. Social Indicators Research, 62/63, 437-454.
Kwak, K. (2003). Adolescents and their parents: A review of intergenerational family
relations for immigrant and non-immigrant families. Human Development, 46,
115-136.
*Lang, F. R., & Schtze, Y. (2002). Adult childrens supportive behaviors and older
parents subjective well-being: A developmental perspective on intergenerational
relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 661-680.
*Lee, M.-D. (2007). Correlates of consequences of intergenerational caregiving in
Taiwan. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59, 47-56.
*Lee, G. R., & Ellithorpe, E. (1982). Intergenerational exchange and subjective wellbeing among the elderly. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 217-224.
*Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K., & Coward, R. T. (1995). Depression among older parents:
The role of intergenerational exchange. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57,
823-833.
Levitt, M. J., Guacci, N., & Weber, R. A. (1992). Intergenerational support, relationship quality, and well-being: A bicultural analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 13,
465-481.
*Li, L., Liang, J., Toler, A., & Gu, S. (2005). Widowhood and depressive symptoms
among older Chinese: Do gender and source of support make a difference? Social
Science & Medicine, 60, 637-647.
*Li, L. W., & Seltzer, M. M. (2003). Parent care, intergenerational relationship quality, and mental health of adult daughters. Research on Aging, 25, 484-504.
*Li, L. W., Seltzer, M. M., & Greenberg, J. S. (1999). Change in depressive symptoms among daughter caregivers: An 18-month longitudinal study. Psychology
and Aging, 14, 206-219.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. London: Sage.
1551
Merz et al.
*Llacer, A., Zunzunegui, M. V., Gutierrez-Cuadra, P., Bland, F., & Zarit, S. H.
(2002). Correlates of well-being of spousal and children carers of disabled people
over 65 in Spain. European Journal of Public Health, 12, 3-9.
Logan, J. R., & Spitze, G. D. (1996). Family ties: Enduring relations between parents
and their grown children. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
*Loomis, L. S., & Booth, A. (1995). Multigenerational caregiving and well-being:
The myth of the beleaguered sandwich generation. Journal of Family Issues, 16,
131-148.
*Lowenstein, A., & Katz, R. (2005). Living arrangements, family solidarity and life satisfaction of two generations of immigrants in Israel. Ageing & Society, 25, 749-767.
*Lowenstein, A., Katz, R., & Gur-Yaish, N. (2007). Reciprocity in parent-child exchange
and life satisfaction among the elderly: A cross-national perspective. Journal of
Social Issues, 63, 865-883.
Magai, C. (2001). Emotions over the life span. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),
Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 399-426). San Diego, CA:
Academic Press.
Marcoen, A., Verschueren, K., & Geerts, G. (1997). Gehechtheid van volwassen
kinderen aan hun ouders als determinanten van ouderzorg [Attachment of adult
children to their parents as determinants of parent care]. In J. P. Baeyens (Ed.),
Gerontologie & geriatrie 1996. Proceedings 19th winter meeting Oostende
(pp. 332-338). Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
*Markides, K. S., Costley, D. S., & Rodriguez, L. (1981). Perceptions of intergenerational relations and psychological well-being among elderly Mexican Americans:
A causal model. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 13,
43-52.
*Markides, K. S., & Krause, N. (1985). Intergenerational solidarity and psychological
well-being among older Mexican Americans: A three generations study. Journal
of Gerontology, 40, 390-392.
*Marks, N. F. (1998). Does it hurt to care? Caregiving, work-family conflict, and
midlife well-being. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 951-966.
*Marks, N. F., Lambert, J. D., & Choi, H. (2002). Transitions to caregiving, gender,
and psychological well-being: A prospective U.S. national study. Journal of Marriage
and Family, 64, 657-667.
*McCulloch, B. J. (1990). The relationship of intergenerational reciprocity of aid
to the morale of older parents: Equity and exchange theory comparisons. Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 45,
S150-S155.
Merz, E.-M., Consedine, N. S., Schulze, H.-J., & Schuengel, C. (2009). Well-being of
adult children and ageing parents is associated with intergenerational support and
relationship quality. Ageing & Society, 29, 783-802.
1552
Merz, E.-M., Schuengel, C., & Schulze, H.-J. (2007). Intergenerational solidarity: An
attachment perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 175-186.
*Mui, A. C. (1995). Caring for frail elderly parents: A comparison of adult sons and
daughters. The Gerontologist, 35, 86-93.
Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced basic meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
*Murphy, B., Schofield, H., Nankervis, J., Bloch, S., Herrman, H., & Singh, B.
(1997). Women with multiple roles: The emotional impact of caring for ageing
parents, Ageing & Society, 17, 277-291.
*Mutran, E., & Reitzes, D. C. (1984). Intergenerational support activities and wellbeing among the elderly: A convergence of exchange and symbolic-interaction
perspectives. American Sociological Review, 49, 117-130.
*Peters-Davis, N. D., Moss, M. S., & Pruchno, R. A. (1999). Children-in-law in caregiving families. The Gerontologist, 39, 66-75.
Pinquart, M., & Srensen, S. (2003). Associations of stressors and uplifts of caregiving with caregiver burden and depressive mood: A meta-analysis. Journals
of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58,
P112-P128.
Pinquart, M., & Srensen, S. (2004). Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts
with subjective well-being and depressive mood: A meta-analytic comparison.
Aging & Mental Health, 8, 438-449.
Pinquart M., & Srensen, S. (2005). Ethnic differences in stressors, resources, and
psychological outcomes of family caregiving for older adults: A meta-analysis.
The Gerontologist, 45, 90-106.
Pinquart, M., & Srensen, S. (2006). Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social
resources, and health: An updated meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology: Series
B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, P33-P45.
*Pruchno, R., & Kleban, M. H. (1993). Caring for an institutionalized parent: The
role of coping strategies. Psychology and Aging, 8, 18-25.
Pype, S., Marcoen, A., & Van Ranst, N. (1996). Filiale maturiteit, zorg voor bejaarde
ouders en welbevinden in de late volwassenheid [Filial maturity, care for elderly
parents and well-being in late adulthood]. In J. P. Baeyens (Ed.), Gerontologie &
geriatrie 1996. Proceedings 19th winter meeting Oostende (pp. 339-344). Leuven,
Belgium: Garant.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in
the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills,
CA: Sage.
*Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I., & Mayer, B. (2005). Adult parentchild relationships: Relationship quality, support, and reciprocity. Psychologie
Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 54, 396-417.
1553
Merz et al.
1554
Townsend, A. L., & Franks, M. M. (1995). Binding ties: Closeness and conflict in
adult childrens caregiving relationships. Psychology and Aging, 10, 343-351.
*Townsend, A., Noelker, L., Deimling, G., & Bass, D. (1989). Longitudinal impact
of interhousehold caregiving on adult childrens mental health. Psychology and
Aging, 4, 393-401.
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship
between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on
underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119,
488-531.
*Umberson, D. (1992). Relationships between adult children and their parents: Psychological consequences for both generations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 664-674.
*Weinstein, M., Glei, D. A., Yamazaki, A., & Ming-Cheng, C. (2004). The role of
intergenerational relations in the association between life stressors and depressive
symptoms. Research on Aging, 26, 511-530.
*Whitbeck, L. B., Hoyt, D. R., & Tyler, K. A. (2001). Family relationship histories,
intergenerational relationship quality, and depressive affect among rural elderly
people. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 20, 214-229.
Wortman, P. M. (1994). Judging research quality. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges
(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 97-109). New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Zarit, S. H., & Eggebeen D. J. (2002). Parent-child relationships in adulthood and
later years. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 135-161). Mahwah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
*Zhan, H. J. (2002). Chinese caregiving burden and the future burden of elder care in
life-course perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development,
54, 267-290.
*Zhan, H. J. (2005). Social-economic context of parent care: Explaining Chinese
caregivers psychological and emotional well-being. Journal of Gerontological
Social Work, 45, 83-100.
Zhan, H. J. (2006). Joy and sorrow: Explaining Chinese caregivers rewards and
stress. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 27-38.
*Zunzunegui, M. V., Bland, F., & Otero, A. (2001). Support from children, living
arrangements, self-rated health and depressive symptoms of older people in Spain.
International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1090-1099.