Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Woodard v. Everyone Who Could, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Jameel Woodard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials regarding unsanitary living conditions. The district court denied relief and Woodard appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the appeal should be denied without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-09-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7033

    Original Title

    Woodard v. Everyone who could, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Jameel Woodard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials regarding unsanitary living conditions. The district court denied relief and Woodard appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the appeal should be denied without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Woodard v. Everyone Who Could, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Jameel Woodard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials regarding unsanitary living conditions. The district court denied relief and Woodard appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and determined the appeal should be denied without requiring oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately represented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7033

    JAMEEL WOODARD,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EVERYONE WHO COULD HAVE STOPPED MY UNSANITARY
    LIVING CONDITIONS BUT DIDNT (B.C.D.C.); WENDY
    SHERROD; RALPH LOGAN; COMMISSIONER FLANAGAN,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-01-2465-AW)

    Submitted:

    September 19, 2002

    Decided:

    September 30, 2002

    Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jameel Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Todd Marrow, Assistant
    Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jameel Woodard appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court. See Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary


    Living Conditions But Didnt (B.C.D.C.), No. CA-01-2465-AW (D. Md.
    June 3, 2002).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like