Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KNOWLEDGE PAPERS
WHAT A WASTE: A GLOBAL REVIEW OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
WHAT A WASTE
A Global Review of Solid Waste Management
Cover photo on right and on this page: Conakry landfill, Guinea (Charles Peterson photographer).
Cover photo on far left: separate containers for recyclables and non-recyclables, Barcelona, Spain (Perinaz Bhada-Tata photographer).
KNOWLEDGE PAPERS
WHAT A WASTE
A Global Review of Solid
Waste Management
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword vii
Acknowledgements viii
Executive Summary ix
Abbreviations and Acronyms xi
Country Classification According to Region xii
Country Classification According to Income xiii
1. Introduction 1
2. Global Waste Management Practices 4
3. Waste Generation 8
4. Waste Collection 13
5. Waste Composition 16
6. Waste Disposal 22
7. Waste and the Environment 25
A Note on the Reliability of Solid Waste Data 32
iv
Annexes
A. Map of Regions 36
B. Map of Income Distribution 38
C. Availability of MSW Data by Country 40
D. Countries Excluded for Lack of Data 45
E. Estimated Solid Waste Management Costs 46
F. MSW Generation Data for Cities Over 100,000 47
G. MSW Collection Data for Cities Over 100,000 63
H. MSW Disposal Methods for Cities Over 100,000 71
I. MSW Composition Data for Cities Over 100,000 78
J. MSW Generation by Country Current Data and Projections for 2025 80
K. MSW Collection Rates by Country 84
L. MSW Disposal Methods by Country 87
M. MSW Composition by Country 90
N. IPCC Classification of MSW Composition 93
O. The Global City Indicators Program 94
References 95
List of Tables
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
List of Figures
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
List of Boxes
1.
2.
3.
4.
What a Waste 1999: Whats changed (and what hasnt) in the last decade 2
Definitions of Municipal Solid Waste 4
Components of an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan 25
Integrated Sustainable Waste Management Framework 26
FOREWORD
Solid waste management is the one thing just
about every city government provides for
its residents. While service levels, environmental impacts and costs vary dramatically,
solid waste management is arguably the most
important municipal service and serves as a
prerequisite for other municipal action.
Currently, world cities generate about 1.3 billion
tonnes of solid waste per year. This volume is
expected to increase to 2.2 billion tonnes by 2025.
Waste generation rates will more than double over
the next twenty years in lower income countries.
Globally, solid waste management costs will
increase from todays annual $205.4 billion to
about $375.5 billion in 2025. Cost increases will
be most severe in low income countries (more
than 5-fold increases) and lower-middle income
countries (more than 4-fold increases).
The global impacts of solid waste are growing
fast. Solid waste is a large source of methane, a
powerful GHG that is particularly impactful in
the short-term. The recycling industry, with more
Acknowledgements
This report was written by Daniel Hoornweg and Perinaz Bhada-Tata; and managed by Abha JoshiGhani, Manager of the Urban Development and Local Government Unit and Zoubida Allaoua, Director
of the Finance, Economics and Local Government Department. The Waste and Climate Change
section is from Charles Peterson. The authors would like to thank Christa Anderson, Julianne Baker
Gallegos, Carl Bartone, Marcus Lee, Catalina Marulanda, John Norton, Charles Peterson, Paul Procee,
and Sintana Vergara for their useful feedback and comments. The report was also discussed and
reviewed by the World Banks Waste Management Thematic Group. Adelaide Barra, Xiaofeng Li,
Jeffrey Lecksell and Claudia Lorena Trejos Gomez provided support and research assistance.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As the world hurtles toward its urban
future, the amount of municipal solid
waste (MSW), one of the most important
by-products of an urban lifestyle, is growing
even faster than the rate of urbanization.
Ten years ago there were 2.9 billion urban
residents who generated about 0.64 kg
of MSW per person per day (0.68 billion
tonnes per year). This report estimates
that today these amounts have increased
to about 3 billion residents generating 1.2
kg per person per day (1.3 billion tonnes
per year). By 2025 this will likely increase
to 4.3 billion urban residents generating
about 1.42 kg/capita/day of municipal solid
waste (2.2 billion tonnes per year).
Municipal solid waste management is the most
important service a city provides; in low-income
countries as well as many middle-income countries,
MSW is the largest single budget item for cities
and one of the largest employers. Solid waste
is usually the one service that falls completely
Africa region
C&D
CDM
EAP
ECA
GDP
GHG
Greenhouse gas
HIC
High-income country
ICI
IPCC
ISWM
LIC
Low-income country
LMIC
MENA
METAP
MRF
MSW
mtCO2e
OECD
PAHO
RDF
Refusederived fuel
SAR
SWM
tCO2e
UMIC
xi
xii
Africa
(AFR)
Eastern
& Central Asia
(ECA)
Latin America
& the Caribbean
(LAC)
Angola
Brunei Darussalam
Albania
Benin
Cambodia
Armenia
Argentina
Botswana
China
Belarus
Bahamas, The
Burkina Faso
Fiji
Bulgaria
Barbados
Burundi
Hong Kong
Croatia
Belize
Cameroon
Indonesia
Cyprus
Cape Verde
Lao PDR
Macao, China
Chad
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Mongolia
Congo, Rep.
Myanmar
Cote dIvoire
Philippines
Romania
Middle East
& North Africa
(MENA)
Algeria
Organisation for
Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD)
Andorra
Bangladesh
Bahrain
Australia
Bhutan
Austria
India
Belgium
Maldives
Iraq
Canada
Nepal
Bolivia
Israel
Czech Republic
Pakistan
Estonia
Brazil
Jordan
Denmark
Sri Lanka
Georgia
Chile
Kuwait
Finland
Malaysia
Latvia
Colombia
Lebanon
France
Marshall Islands
Lithuania
Costa Rica
Malta
Germany
Macedonia, FYR
Cuba
Morocco
Greece
Poland
Dominica
Oman
Hungary
Dominican Republic
Qatar
Iceland
Eritrea
Singapore
Russian Federation
Ecuador
Saudi Arabia
Ireland
Ethiopia
Solomon Islands
Serbia
El Salvador
Italy
Gabon
Thailand
Slovenia
Grenada
Tunisia
Japan
Gambia
Tonga
Tajikistan
Guatemala
Korea, South
Luxembourg
Ghana
Vanuatu
Turkey
Guyana
Guinea
Vietnam
Turkmenistan
Haiti
Monaco
Kenya
Honduras
Netherlands
Lesotho
Jamaica
New Zealand
Liberia
Mexico
Norway
Madagascar
Nicaragua
Portugal
Malawi
Panama
Slovak Republic
Mali
Paraguay
Spain
Mauritania
Peru
Sweden
Mauritius
Switzerland
Mozambique
St. Lucia
United Kingdom
Namibia
United States
Niger
Suriname
Nigeria
Rwanda
Uruguay
Venezuela, RB
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
South Asia
(SAR)
Chad
Bulgaria
Colombia
Barbados
Comoros
Cameroon
Costa Rica
Belgium
Cape Verde
Cuba
Brunei Darussalam
Eritrea
China
Dominica
Canada
Ethiopia
Congo, Rep.
Dominican Republic
Croatia
Gambia
Cote d'Ivoire
Fiji
Cyprus
Ghana
Ecuador
Gabon
Czech Republic
Guinea
Georgia
Denmark
Haiti
El Salvador
Grenada
Estonia
Kenya
Guatemala
Jamaica
Finland
Lao PDR
Guyana
Latvia
France
Liberia
Honduras
Lebanon
Germany
Madagascar
India
Lithuania
Greece
Malawi
Indonesia
Malaysia
Mali
Mauritius
Hungary
Mauritania
Iraq
Mexico
Iceland
Mongolia
Jordan
Myanmar
Ireland
Mozambique
Lesotho
Namibia
Israel
Nepal
Macedonia, FYR
Panama
Italy
Niger
Maldives
Peru
Japan
Rwanda
Marshall Islands
Poland
Korea, South
Senegal
Morocco
Romania
Kuwait
Serbia
Nicaragua
Russian Federation
Luxembourg
Sierra Leone
Nigeria
Seychelles
Macao, China
Tanzania
Pakistan
South Africa
Malta
Togo
Paraguay
Monaco
Uganda
Philippines
St. Lucia
Netherlands
Vanuatu
New Zealand
Vietnam
Solomon Islands
Suriname
Norway
Zambia
Sri Lanka
Tajikistan
Oman
Zimbabwe
Sudan
Uruguay
Portugal
Swaziland
Venezuela, RB
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Thailand
Singapore
Tonga
Slovak Republic
Tunisia
Slovenia
Turkey
Spain
Turkmenistan
Sweden
Switzerland
Trinidad and Tobago
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
xiii
Introduction
In 1999 the World Bank published What a Waste:
Solid Waste Management in Asia (Hoornweg and
Thomas 1999), with an estimate of waste quantities
and composition for Asia. In the intervening
decade more accurate and comprehensive data
became available for most regions of the world.
OECD-country estimates are typically reliable and
consistentadded to these were comprehensive
studies for China and India and the Pan-American
Health Organizations study for Latin America.
Therefore a global update of the 1999 report is
possible, and timely.
Municipal solid waste managers are charged with
an enormous task: get the waste out from underfoot
and do so in the most economically, socially, and
environmentally optimal manner possible. Solid
waste management is almost always the responsibility of local governments and is often their
single largest budget item, particularly in developing countries. Solid waste management and
street sweeping is also often the citys single largest
source of employment.1 Additionally, solid waste
is one of the most pernicious local pollutants
uncollected solid waste is usually the leading
contributor to local flooding and air and water
pollution. And if that task were not large enough,
local waste management officials also need to deal
with the integrated and international aspects of
solid waste, and increasingly with demographic
change in the work force, employment generation,
and management of staff both formal and
informal.
BOX 1
``There is a greater emphasis on labor issues: in highincome countries, demographics and immigration
are critical factors; in low-income countries working
conditions and integration of waste pickers has
gained in importance.
BOX 2
TABLE 1
Comparison of Solid Waste Management Practices by Income Level (adapted from What a Waste 1999)
Activity
Low Income
Middle Income
High Income
Collection
Recycling
Composting
Incineration
Landfilling/
Dumping
Costs
(see Annex E)
Source
Residential
Industrial
Commercial
Institutional
Same as commercial
Municipal Services
All of the above should be included as municipal solid waste. Industrial, commercial, and institutional (ICI) wastes are often grouped
together and usually represent more than 50% of MSW. C&D waste is often treated separately: if well managed it can be disposed
separately. The items below are usually considered MSW if the municipality oversees their collection and disposal.
Process
Medical waste
Agricultural
TABLE 2
Generators and
Types of Solid Waste
(adapted from
What a Waste 1999)
Waste Generation
At a Glance:
` MSW generation levels are expected to double by 2025.
` The higher the income level and rate of urbanization, the greater the amount of solid waste
produced.
` OECD countries produce almost half of the worlds waste, while Africa and South Asia regions
produce the least waste.
Waste generation in sub-Saharan Africa is approximately 62 million tonnes per year. Per capita waste
generation is generally low in this region, but spans
a wide range, from 0.09 to 3.0 kg per person per day,
with an average of 0.65 kg/capita/day. The countries
with the highest per capita rates are islands, likely
due to waste generated by the tourism industry, and
a more complete accounting of all wastes generated.
The annual waste generation in East Asia and the
Pacific Region is approximately 270 million tonnes
per year. This quantity is mainly influenced by
waste generation in China, which makes up 70%
of the regional total. Per capita waste generation
ranges from 0.44 to 4.3 kg per person per day for
Photo: Jeroo Bhada
TABLE 3
Lower Boundary
Upper Boundary
Average
AFR
0.09
3.0
0.65
EAP
0.44
4.3
0.95
ECA
0.29
2.1
1.1
LAC
0.11
MENA
0.16
14
5.7
1.1
OECD
1.10
3.7
2.2
0.12
5.1
0.45
Current Waste
Generation Per
Capita by Region
(see Annex J)
1.1
SAR
SAR
5%
AFR
5%
FIG. 1
MENA
6%
Waste Generation
by Region
ECA
7%
OECD
44%
LAC
12%
EAP
21%
10
TABLE 4
Waste Generation
Projections for
2025 by Region
Total Urban
Population
(millions)
Region
Total
(tons/day)
Per Capita
(kg/capita/day)
Total
(tons/day)
AFR
260
0.65
169,119
1,152
518
0.85
441,840
777
0.95
738,958
2,124
1,229
1.5
1,865,379
ECA
227
1.1
254,389
339
239
1.5
354.810
LCR
399
1.1
437,545
681
466
1.6
728,392
MENA
162
1.1
173,545
379
257
1.43
369,320
1,566,286
1,031
842
2.1
1,742,417
192,410
1,938
734
0.77
567,545
3,532,252
7,644
4,285
OECD
729
2.2
SAR
426
0.45
2,980
1.2
TABLE 5
Income Level
1.4
6,069,703
Upper Boundary
Average
High
0.70
14
2.1
Upper Middle
0.11
5.5
1.2
Lower Middle
0.16
5.3
0.79
Lower
0.09
4.3
0.60
Waste Generation
by Country Income Level 3
High-income countries produce the most waste
per capita, while low income countries produce
the least solid waste per capita. Although the
total waste generation for lower middle income
countries is higher than that of upper middle
income countries, likely skewed as a result of
Chinas inclusion in the lower middle income
3
EAP
Total
Current Waste
Generation
Per Capita
by Income Level
Projected Population
Countries are classified into four income levels according to World Bank
estimates of 2005 GNI per capita. High: $10,726 or above; Upper middle:
$3,466-10,725; Lower middle: $876-3,465; and Lower: $875 or less.
11
Lower
Income
6%
FIG. 2
Waste Generation
by Income
Lower Middle
Income
29%
High
Income
46%
Upper Middle
Income
19%
Total Urban
Population
(millions)
TABLE 6
Projected Population
Per Capita
(kg/capita/
day)
Total
(tons/day)
343
0.60
204,802
1,637
676
1,293
0.78
1,012,321
4,010
2,080
1.3
2,618,804
572
1.16
665,586
888
619
1.6
987,039
774
2.13
1,649,547
1,112
912
2.1
1,879,590
2,982
1.19
3,532,256
7,647
4,287
1.4
6,069,705
Lower Income
High Income
Total
Total Population
(millions)
Urban
Population
(millions)
Total
(tons/day)
0.86
584,272
Waste Generation
Projections for 2025
by Income
12
TABLE 7
Variable
Current GDP (current US$, 2005)
TABLE 8
Average MSW
Generation Rates
by Income
Data Source
Income Level
Low-Income
0.6 1.0
Middle-Income
0.8 1.5
High-Income
1.1 4.5
FIG. 3
Urban Waste
Generation
by Income Level
and Year
1,200
956
1,000
800
686
602
600
369
400
243
213
200
0
360
75
343
219
676
343
Lower
Income
1,293 2,080
288
344
573
423
619
628
Lower Middle
Income
Upper Middle
Income
2010
Projected 2025
774
777
912
840
High
Income
13
Waste Collection
At a Glance:
` MSW collection is an important aspect in maintaining public health in cities around the world.
` The amount of MSW collected varies widely by region and income level; collection within cities
can also differ greatly.
` Collection rates range from a low of 41% in low-income countries to a high of 98%
in high-income countries.
iStockphoto.com/brytta
14
Separate
garbage
containers,
Singapore
FIG. 4
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
High Income
Upper Middle
Income
Lower Middle
Income
Lower Income
FIG. 5
80%
60%
70%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
OECD
MENA
LAC
ECA
EAP
SAR
AFR
15
16
Waste Composition
At a Glance:
` Waste composition is influenced by factors such as culture, economic development, climate,
and energy sources; composition impacts how often waste is collected and how it is disposed.
` Low-income countries have the highest proportion of organic waste.
` Paper, plastics, and other inorganic materials make up the highest proportion of MSW in highincome countries.
` By region, EAP has the highest proportion of organic waste at 62%, while OECD countries have
the least at 27%, although total amount of organic waste is still highest in OECD countries.
` Although waste composition is usually provided by weight, as a countrys affluence increases,
waste volumes tend to be more important, especially with regard to collection: organics
and inerts generally decrease in relative terms, while increasing paper and plastic increases
overall waste volumes.
Types of Waste
and Their Sources
Type
Sources
Organic
Food scraps, yard (leaves, grass, brush) waste, wood, process residues
Paper
Plastic
Glass
Metal
Cans, foil, tins, non-hazardous aerosol cans, appliances (white goods), railings, bicycles
Other
Textiles, leather, rubber, multi-laminates, e-waste, appliances, ash, other inert materials
Metal
1%
Others
10%
FIG. 6
Glass
2%
Waste
Composition
in China
Plastic
13%
Organic
65%
Organic
41%
Others
47%
Paper
9%
Metal
1%
Glass
2%
Plastic
4%
Paper
5%
Municipal Waste Genereated from Population Using Coal for household heating = 49,500,000 tons
Municipal Waste Genereated from Population Using Gas for household heating = 100,500,000 tons
Total Municipal Waste Generation in 2000 = 150,000,000 tons
Other
18%
FIG. 7
Global
Solid Waste
Composition
Metal
4%
Organic
46%
Glass
5%
Plastic
10%
Paper
17%
17
18
in a location can have an impact on the composition of MSW generated. This is especially true
in low-income countries or regions where energy
for cooking, heating, and lighting might not come
from district heating systems or the electricity
grid. For example, Figure 6 shows the difference
in waste composition in China between a section
of the population that uses coal and another that
uses natural gas for space heating. The other
category is clearly higher: 47% when coal is used,
and an ash residue is included, as opposed to 10%
when natural gas is used for home heating.
Climate can also influence waste generation in
a city, country, or region. For example, in Ulan
Bator, Mongolia, ash makes up 60% of the MSW
generated in the winter, but only 20% in the summer
(UNEP/GRID-Arendal 2004). Precipitation is also
important in waste composition, particularly when
measured by mass, as un-containerized waste can
absorb significant amounts of water from rain and
snow. Humidity also influences waste composition
by influencing moisture content.
Methodology
This report includes waste composition data that
was available for 105 countries from various sources.
Please see Annex M for further information on
MSW composition data by country. Waste composition data is generally available as percentages
of the various waste streams, commonly divided
into the categories shown in Table 10. In some
cases, other wastes are further disaggregated into
textiles, rubber, ash, etc. However, for the purposes
of standardization and simplification the other
category in this report includes all of these wastes.
Although the definitions and methodologies for
determining composition are not always provided
or standardized in the waste studies referenced, the
compositions for MSW are assumed to be based
on wet weight. Each waste category was calculated
using waste generation figures from individual
19
FIG. 8
Other
15%
Other
17%
Waste Composition
by Income
Metal
2%
Metal
3%
Glass
3%
Glass
3%
Organic
64%
Plastic
8%
Organic
59%
Plastic
12%
Paper
5%
Paper
9%
Other
13%
Other
17%
Organic
28%
Metal
3%
Glass
5%
Metal
6%
Organic
54%
Plastic
11%
Glass
7%
Plastic
11%
Paper
14%
Paper
31%
TABLE 10
CURRENT ESTIMATES*
Source:
Income Level
Organic (%)
Paper (%)
Plastic (%)
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
Low Income
64
17
59
12
15
54
14
11
13
High Income
28
31
11
17
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
2025 ESTIMATES**
Income Level
Organic (%)
Paper (%)
Plastic (%)
Low Income
62
17
55
10
13
15
50
15
12
15
High Income
28
30
11
18
Types of Waste
Composition by
Income Level
20
CURRENT
FIG. 9
Solid Waste
Composition
by Income
and Year
2025
Other
17%
Metal
Glass 3%
3%
Plastic
8% Paper
5%
Other
Metal
17%
3%
Glass
3%
Plastic
9%
Paper
6%
Low Income
Organic
64%
75 MT*
Organic
62%
201 MT
Other
15%
Other
15%
Metal
2%
Glass
3%
Lower Middle
Income
Organic
59%
Plastic
12%
Metal
3%
Glass
4%
Organic
55%
Plastic
13%
Paper
9%
Paper
10%
369 MT
Metal
3%
956 MT
Other
15%
Other
13%
Upper Middle
Income
Glass
5%
Organic
54%
Plastic
11%
Metal
4%
Glass
4%
Organic
50%
Plastic
12%
Paper
14%
Paper
15%
243 MT
High Income
Others
17%
426 MT
Other
18%
Organic
28%
Metal
6%
Organic
28%
Metal
6%
Glass
7%
Glass
7%
Plastic
11%
Paper
31%
602 MT
Source: Current data vary by country.
*Total annual waste volume in millions of tonnes
Plastic
11%
Paper
30%
686 MT
21
Waste Composition
by Region
Other
10%
Metal
2%
Glass
3%
Plastic
13%
FIG. 10
Plastic
13%
Organic
62%
Paper
10%
Paper
9%
d. SAR Composition
Other
19%
Other
37%
Metal
5%
Organic
47
Glass
7%
Plastic
8%
Organic
50%
Metal
1%
Glass
Paper
1% Plastic 4%
7%
Paper
14%
Metal
2%
Glass
4%
Plastic
9%
Organic
54%
Plastic
12%
Organic
61%
Paper
14%
Other
12%
Paper
16%
Metal
6%
Glass
7%
Plastic
11%
Paper
32%
Waste Disposal
At a Glance:
` Landfilling and thermal treatment of waste are the most common methods
of MSW disposal in high-income countries.
` Although quantitative data is not readily available, most low- and lower middle-income
countries dispose of their waste in open dumps.
` Several middle-income countries have poorly operated landfills; disposal should
likely be classified as controlled dumping.
Methodology
Waste disposal data was available for 87 countries
through various sources. Annex L presents MSW
disposal methods data by country. Waste disposal
data sets are generally available as percentages of the
various waste disposal options, commonly divided
into the categories shown in Table 10. Although
the definitions and methodologies for calculating
waste disposal methods and quantities are not
always provided or standardized in waste studies,
the disposal of MSW is assumed to be based on wet
weight. Each waste disposal category was calculated
using waste generation figures for the individual
country. The total waste disposal figures by income
and by region were then aggregated.
Figure 11 shows current annual global MSW
disposal for the entire world. These are only
approximate values, given that the data is from
various years.
FIG. 11
22
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Landfill
Recycled
WTE
Dump
Disposal Options
Compost
Other
High Income
TABLE 11
Dumps
0.05
Dumps
44
Landfills
250
Landfills
80
Compost
66
Compost
1.3
Recycled
129
Recycled
Incineration
122
Incineration
0.18
Other
8.4
Other
21
1.9
Low Income
Dumps
Dumps
23
27*
Landfills
2.2
Landfills
6.1
Compost
0.05
Compost
1.2
Recycled
0.02
Recycled
2.9
Incineration
0.05
Incineration
0.12
Other
0.97
Other
18
*This value is relatively high due to the inclusion of China.
MSW Disposal
by Income
(million tonnes)
24
FIG. 12
FIG. 13
Compost
1%
Dumps
13%
Other
26%
Recycled
1%
Income
0%
Other
6%
Dumps
33%
Income
1%
Recycled
0%
Compost
1%
Landfills
59%
Landfills
59%
TABLE 12
MSW Disposal
Dumps
Source: Hoornweg 2005
in two contrasting
regions (million Landfills
tonnes) Compost
AFR
OECD
2.3
Dumps
2.6
Landfills
242
0.05
Compost
66
Recycled
0.14
Recycled
125
Incineration
0.05
Incineration
120
Other
0.11
Other
20
25
ysis of both investment and recurrent costs associated with the proposed facilities and services, over
the lifetime of the plan (or facilities);
options) for waste collection, transportation, treatment, and disposal of the defined types and quantities of solid wastes (this must address options for
all types of solid waste arising);
BOX 3
26
BOX 4
Sus
tai
na
b
Local/Regulatory Authorities
NGOs/CBOs
Service Users
Informal/Formal Sector
Donor Agencies
Stakeholders
Elements
Aspects
Environmental
Political/Legal
Institutional
Socio-Cultural
Financial/Economic
Technical
and Performance
Adapted
van
de Klundert
and Anschtz
2001.
Adapted
fromfrom
van de
Klundert
and Anschtz
2001.
27
FIG. 14
Waste Hierarchy
Reduce
Reuse
Waste Diversion
Recycle
Recover
(digestion, composting)
Landfill
Incineration
Waste Disposal
Controlled Dump*
Least preferred option
*As a minimum, waste should be disposed at a controlled dump, which includes site selection,
controlled access, and where practical, compaction of waste. Incineration requires a complimentary
sanitary landfill, as bottom ash, non-combustibles and by-passed waste needs to be landfilled.
28
Maputo Fapel,
paper mill and paper
recycling factory
29
Leachate Management
Semi-controlled Dumps
Unrestricted contaminant
release
None
Controlled Dump
Unrestricted contaminant
release
None
Engineered Landfill/
Controlled Landfill
Sanitary Landfill
TABLE 13
Landfill
Classifications
30
TABLE 14
Landfill Methane
Emissions and Total
GHG Emissions for
Selected Countries
Country
Brazil
16
659
2.4%
China
45
3,650
1.2%
India
14
1,210
1.1%
Mexico
31
383
8.1%
South Africa
16
380
4.3%
*EPA 2006a.
**UNFCCC 2005.
A transfer
station
in Amman,
Jordan
Technology Options
Waste Reduction
Waste Collection
Recycling/Materials Recovery
Materials recovery facility (MRF) to process source separated materials or mixed waste,
although source separated is the preferred option as the materials would have less
contamination from other discards.
MRFs use a combination of manual and mechanical sorting options. Waste pickers could be used
as a source of labor for manual sorting stages.
Composting/Anaerobic Digestion
Institute composting programs ideally with source separated organics. As with recyclables source
separated materials reduce the contamination associated with recovery from mixed waste.
Compost the organic material after digestion to produce a useful soil conditioner and avoid
landfill disposal. Finished compost applied to soils is also an important method to reduce GHG
emissions by reducing nitrogen requirements and associated GHG emissions.
Incineration/Waste-to-energy/
RefuseDerived Fuel (RDF)
Use the combustible fraction of waste as a fuel either in a dedicated combustion facility
(incineration) with or without energy recovery or as RDF in a solid fuel boiler.
Landfill
Capture the methane generated in disposal sites and flare or use as a renewable energy resource.
Policy Recommendations
for Reducing GHG Emissions
Governments have a range of policy options to
encourage waste management practices that will
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Practical approaches
that could be applied in most cities include:
` Public education to inform people about their
options to reduce waste generation and increase
recycling and composting.
` Pricing mechanisms, such as product charges
can stimulate consumer behavior to reduce
waste generation and increase recycling. A
product charge is a cost assessment added to the
price of a product and is tied to the cost of the
desired waste management system. Consumers
would pay for the waste management service
31
TABLE 15
Technical GHG
Mitigation
Opportunities by
Waste Management
Component
32
Rarely is it disclosed at what stage the waste generation rates and composition were determined, and
whether they were estimated or physically measured.
The most accurate method measures the waste
generated at source before any recycling, composting,
burning, or open dumping takes place. However,
the generation rate and composition are commonly
calculated using waste quantities arriving at the final
disposal site. This method of measurement does not
fully represent the waste stream because waste can be
diverted prior to final disposal, especially in low- and
Bangalore,
India
33
ANNEXES
36
ANNEX A
Map of Regions
Greenland
(Den)
Iceland
Faeroe
Islands
(Den)
The Netherlands
Isle of Man (UK)
Canada
Unite
Kingdo
Ireland
Channel Islands (UK)
Luxembourg
Liechtenstein
Switzerland
Andorra
United States
Portugal
Spain
Gibraltar (UK)
Bermuda
(UK)
Morocco
A
Former
Spanish
Sahara
The Bahamas
Cayman Is.(UK)
Mexico
Cuba
Mauritania
Haiti
Belize Jamaica
Guatemala Honduras
El Salvador Nicaragua
Cape Verde
Mali
Senegal
The Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
R.B. de
Venezuela
Guyana
Suriname
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Colombia
Burkina
Faso
Cte Ghana
dIvoire
To
Equatorial G
So Tom and Pr
Ecuador
Kiribati
Brazil
Peru
Samoa
Fiji
Bolivia
Tonga
Paraguay
Dominican
Republic
Puerto
Rico (US)
U.S. Virgin
Islands (US)
St. Martin(Fr)
St. Maarten(Neth)
Dominica
St. Lucia
Barbados
Grenada
R.B. de Venezuela
Chile
Trinidad
and Tobago
Poland
Czech Republic
Slovak Repu
Uruguay
Argentina
Austria
Guadeloupe (Fr)
Martinique (Fr)
Aruba Bonaire Curaao
(Neth) (Neth) (Neth)
Germany
Hungary
Slovenia
Croatia
Bosnia and
Italy
Herzegovina Serb
San
Marino
Montenegro Koso
Vatican
City
Mac
Albania
G
ANNEX
37
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Russian Federation
Estonia
Denmark Russian Latvia
Fed.
Lithuania
ed
Germany Poland Belarus
om
Belgium
Ukraine
Moldova
Romania
France Italy
Bulgaria
Monaco
Tunisia
Algeria
Turkey
Greece
Georgia
Armenia Azerbaijan
Cyprus
Lebanon
Israel
Syrian
Arab
Rep.
Jordan
Malta
Libya
Niger
Benin
Kazakhstan
Arab Rep.
of Egypt
Chad
Eritrea
Sudan
Dem.Peoples
Rep.of Korea
Tajikistan
Pakistan
United Arab
Emirates
Oman
ogo
Guinea
ncipe
Cameroon
Central
African
Republic
Bangladesh
India
Myanmar
Gabon
Congo
Sri
Lanka
Guam (US)
Philippines
Brunei Darussalam
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
Palau
Maldives
Kenya
Rwanda
Dem.Rep.of Burundi
Congo
Tanzania
Vietnam
Cambodia
Somalia
Uganda
Lao
P.D.R.
Thailand
Rep. of Yemen
Ethiopia
South
Sudan
Japan
Bhutan
Nepal
Djibouti
Nigeria
Rep.of
Korea
China
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Qatar
Saudi
Arabia
Kyrgyz
Rep.
Uzbekistan
Turkmenistan
Islamic Rep.
of Iran
Kuwait
Iraq
Mongolia
Nauru
Singapore
Seychelles
Comoros
Solomon
Islands
Indonesia
Tuvalu
Timor-Leste
Angola
Malawi
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Namibia
Mayotte
(Fr)
Mozambique
Botswana
Madagascar
Vanuatu
South
Africa
Fiji
Mauritius
Runion (Fr)
Australia
Swaziland
Kiribati
New
Caledonia
(Fr)
Lesotho
Ukraine
ublic
Romania
bia
Classified according to
ovo Bulgaria
FYR
cedonia
Greece
Antarctica
New
Zealand
Sub-Saharan Africa
High-income economies
OECD
Other
No data
38
ANNEX B
Greenland
(Den)
Iceland
Faeroe
Islands
(Den)
The Netherlands
Isle of Man (UK)
Canada
Unite
Kingdo
Ireland
Channel Islands (UK)
Luxembourg
Liechtenstein
Switzerland
Andorra
United States
Portugal
Spain
Gibraltar (UK)
Bermuda
(UK)
Morocco
A
Former
Spanish
Sahara
The Bahamas
Cayman Is.(UK)
Mexico
Cuba
Mauritania
Haiti
Belize Jamaica
Guatemala Honduras
El Salvador Nicaragua
Cape Verde
Mali
Senegal
The Gambia
Guinea-Bissau
R.B. de
Venezuela
Guyana
Suriname
Guinea
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Colombia
Burkina
Faso
Cte Ghana
dIvoire
To
Equatorial G
So Tom and Pr
Ecuador
Kiribati
Brazil
Peru
Samoa
Fiji
Bolivia
Tonga
Paraguay
Dominican
Republic
Puerto
Rico (US)
U.S. Virgin
Islands (US)
St. Martin(Fr)
St. Maarten(Neth)
Dominica
St. Lucia
Barbados
Grenada
R.B. de Venezuela
Chile
Trinidad
and Tobago
Polan
Czech Republic
Slovak Repu
Uruguay
Argentina
Austria
Guadeloupe (Fr)
Martinique (Fr)
Aruba Bonaire Curaao
(Neth) (Neth) (Neth)
Germany
Hungary
Slovenia
Croatia
Bosnia and
Italy
Herzegovina Ser
San
Marino
Montenegro Koso
Vatican
City
Mac
Albania
ANNEX
39
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Russian Federation
Estonia
Denmark Russian Latvia
Fed.
Lithuania
ed
Germany Poland Belarus
om
Belgium
Ukraine
Moldova
Romania
France Italy
Bulgaria
Monaco
Tunisia
Algeria
Kazakhstan
Turkey
Greece
Cyprus
Lebanon
Israel
Syrian
Arab
Rep.
Jordan
Malta
Libya
Niger
Georgia
Armenia
Arab Rep.
of Egypt
Chad
a
Benin
Dem.Peoples
Rep.of Korea
Tajikistan
Pakistan
United Arab
Emirates
Oman
Togo
Guinea
ncipe
Cameroon
Central
African
Republic
Bangladesh
India
Myanmar
Rep. of Yemen
Gabon
Congo
Sri
Lanka
Guam (US)
Philippines
Brunei Darussalam
Malaysia
Marshall Islands
Palau
Maldives
Kenya
Rwanda
Dem.Rep.of Burundi
Congo
Tanzania
Vietnam
Cambodia
Somalia
Uganda
Lao
P.D.R.
Thailand
Ethiopia
South
Sudan
Japan
Bhutan
Nepal
Djibouti
Nigeria
Rep.of
Korea
China
Afghanistan
Bahrain
Qatar
Eritrea
Sudan
Turkmenistan
Islamic Rep.
of Iran
Kuwait
Saudi
Arabia
Kyrgyz
Rep.
Uzbekistan
Azerbaijan
Iraq
Mongolia
Comoros
Solomon
Islands
Indonesia
Tuvalu
Timor-Leste
Angola
Malawi
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Namibia
Mayotte
(Fr)
Mozambique
Botswana
Vanuatu
Madagascar
Fiji
Mauritius
New
Caledonia
(Fr)
Runion (Fr)
Australia
Swaziland
South
Africa
nd
Kiribati
Nauru
Singapore
Seychelles
Lesotho
Ukraine
ublic
New
Zealand
Romania
rbia
ovo Bulgaria
FYR
cedonia
Greece
Antarctica
No data
40
ANNEX C
Collection
Urban
or
Total
Year of
Data
Source
2006
Denmark
Ministry of
Foreign Affairs
2005
UNSD (2009)
2002
METAP (2004)
2002
OECD
AFR
x
x
2007
2005
UNSD (2009)
USAID (2009)
2007
METAP
(2004)
UNSD (2009)
HIC
LCR
2001
PAHO (2005)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
UMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
LCR
MENA
x
x
x
x
x
x
2001
2007
1999
2006
2001
2000
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
2007
2003
2004
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
Bangladesh4
LI
SAR
2004
Barbados
HIC
LCR
2001
Belarus
UMI
ECA
2005
Belgium
Belize
Benin2
Bhutan
HIC
LMI
LI
LMI
OECD
LCR
AFR
SAR
x
x
x
x
2006
2001
2005
2007
Bolivia
LMI
LCR
2003
Botswana
UMI
AFR
1998
Brazil
Brunei
Darussalam
UMI
LCR
2001
HIC
EAP
2006
Bulgaria
LMI
ECA
2007
Burkina Faso2
Burundi2
LI
LI
AFR
AFR
x
x
2005
2005
PAHO (2005)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
UNESCWA (2007)
Bangladesh
Department of
Environment
(2004)
PAHO (2005)
Belarus Ministry
of Natural
Resources
(2006)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
USAID (2009)
Phuntsho (2008)
Business News
Americas (2004)
Kgathi and
Bolaane (2001)
PAHO (2005)
Ngoc and
Schnitzer (2009)
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
USAID (2009)
USAID (2009)
Cambodia5
LI
EAP
Cameroon
LMI
AFR
2000
Canada
Cape Verde2
Central African
Republic2
Chad2
Chile
HIC
LMI
OECD
AFR
x
x
1990
2005
Parrot et al.
(2009)
OECD (2008)
USAID (2009)
LI
AFR
2005
USAID (2009)
LI
UMI
AFR
LCR
x
x
2005
2001
China
LMI
EAP
2004
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem.
Rep.2
Congo, Rep.
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire2
Croatia6
Cuba
UMI
LI
LCR
AFR
x
x
2001
2003
USAID (2009)
PAHO (2005)
Hoornweg et al.
(2005)
PAHO (2005)
Payet (2003)
LI
AFR
2005
USAID (2009)
LMI
UMI
LMI
HIC
UMI
AFR
LCR
AFR
ECA
LCR
x
x
x
x
x
2005
2001
2005
2008
2001
USAID (2009)
PAHO (2005)
USAID (2009)
Vego (2008)
PAHO (2005)
Income
Level
Region
Albania1
LMI
ECA
Algeria
UMI
MENA
Andorra
Angola2
Antigua and
Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Bahamas, The
Bahrain3
HIC
LMI
Country
Gen- Year of
eration Data
Disposal
Year of
Data
2002
2007
UNSD (2009)
2005
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
2005
2000
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
2003
2005
2007
Source
METAP (2004)
Belarus Ministry
of Natural
Resources
(2006)
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
2002
UNSD (2009)
2007
2000
Kum et al.
(2005)
2004
1996
UNSD (2009)
Composition
Year of
Data
Source
2005
UNSD (2009)
2002
METAP (2004)
2005
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
x
2001
2007
2005
2004
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
2004
UNSD (2009)
2004
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
x
2003
1997
2002
2008
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
Phuntsho (2008)
1999
UNSD (2009)
2006
2006
UNSD (2009)
Ngoc and Schnitzer
(2009)
2000
2006
UNSD (2009)
2004
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
2001
2004
Kum et al.
(2005)
Parrot et al.
(2009)
OECD (2008)
2006
UNSD (2009)
1998
UNSD (2009)
x
x
T
T
2001
2003
PAHO (2005)
Payet (2003)
2005
PAHO (2005)
2005
UNSD (2009)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2005
UNSD (2009)
x
x
T
T
2005
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
2006
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
2000
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
ANNEX
41
ANNEX C (continued)
Region
Cyprus
HIC
ECA
2007
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominica
Dominican
Republic
Ecuador3
HIC
HIC
UMI
OECD
OECD
LCR
x
x
x
UMI
LCR
LMI
LCR
LMI
El Salvador
Eritrea2
Estonia
Country
Gen- Year of
eration Data
Source
Collection
Urban
or
Total
Year of
Data
Source
Disposal
Year of
Data
Source
Composition
Year of
Data
Source
2007
UNSD (2009)
2001
UNSD (2009)
2006
2006
2001
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
2007
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
2004
2003
2005
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
1996
2005
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2000
UNSD (2009)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
MENA
2000
METAP (2004)
2000
2000
METAP (2004)
2000
METAP (2004)
LMI
LI
LCR
AFR
x
x
2001
2005
2001
PAHO (2005)
METAP
(2004)
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
HIC
ECA
2007
2001
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
Ethiopia7
LI
AFR
2006
1995
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon2
Gambia2
Georgia
Germany
UMI
HIC
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
HIC
EAP
OECD
OECD
AFR
AFR
ECA
OECD
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1994
2006
2006
2005
2005
2007
2006
x
x
x
1994
2000
2005
McIntyre (2005)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
x
x
x
2001
2007
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
2008
1997
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
2006
2007
2000
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
LI
AFR
2008
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong,
China
Hungary
Iceland
HIC
UMI
LMI
LI
LMI
LI
LMI
OECD
LCR
LCR
AFR
LCR
LCR
LCR
x
x
x
2006
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
USAID (2009)
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
Tadesse et al.
(2008)
McIntyre (2005)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
USAID (2009)
USAID (2009)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
Asase et al.
(2009)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
x
x
x
2001
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
x
x
x
T
T
T
2001
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
x
x
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
HIC
EAP
2008
Shekdar (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2008
Shekdar (2009)
HIC
HIC
OECD
OECD
x
x
2006
2006
x
x
T
T
2003
2007
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
2003
2004
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
x
x
2005
2003
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
India
LMI
SAR
2006
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
Hanrahan et al.
(2006)
2004
UNSD (2009)
Indonesia8
LMI
EAP
2008
Shekdar (2009)
2006
Pasang et al.
(2007)
2000
LMI
MENA
2005
2005
LMI
HIC
MENA
OECD
x
x
2005
2006
x
x
T
T
2005
2005
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
2005
OECD (2008)
Israel
HIC
MENA
1996
Italy
Jamaica3
Japan
HIC
UMI
HIC
OECD
LCR
OECD
x
x
x
Jordan
LMI
MENA
Kenya
LI
Korea, South
Kuwait
Ghana
Iran, Islamic
Rep.9
Iraq10
Ireland
x
x
T
T
2007
2007
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
T
T
2007
2007
2008
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
2001
2001
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
Asase et al.
(2009)
UNSD (2009)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
2006
2001
2005
Damghani et al.
(2008)
UNESCWA (2007)
OECD (2008)
Israel Ministry of
the Environment
(2000)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
OECD (2008)
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
2001
2003
2001
METAP (2004)
2001
AFR
2002
HIC
OECD
2005
2002
HIC
MENA
2009
Kenya Ministry
of Environment
(2002)
OECD (2008)
Personal
communication
x
x
2004
2005
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
2004
2008
x
x
x
2003
2001
2001
OECD (2008)
Asase et al.
(2009)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
2005
1996
UNSD (2009)
PAHO (2005)
UNSD (2009)
METAP
(2004)
x
x
x
UNSD (2009)
2005
UNSD (2009)
2005
2001
2003
OECD (2008)
Israel Ministry of
the Environment
(2000)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
OECD (2008)
x
x
x
2005
2007
2008
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
Shekdar (2009)
2001
METAP (2004)
2001
METAP (2004)
2004
OECD (2008)
2005
OECD (2008)
42
ANNEX C (continued)
LI
EAP
2008
Shekdar (2009)
Latvia
UMI
ECA
2007
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
1999
UNSD (2009)
2003
Lebanon
UMI
MENA
2000
METAP (2004)
2000
METAP
(2004)
2000
Lesotho
Liberia11
LMI
LI
AFR
AFR
2005
USAID (2009)
Lao PDR
Gen- Year of
eration Data
Source
UMI
ECA
2007
Luxembourg
Macao, China
HIC
HIC
OECD
EAP
x
x
2006
2003
Macedonia, FYR
LMI
ECA
2006
LI
LI
AFR
AFR
x
x
2003
2005
Malaysia12
UMI
EAP
2002
Maldives
LMI
SAR
1998
LI
AFR
2007
Malta
HIC
MENA
2007
Marshall Islands
Mauritania2
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
LMI
LI
UMI
UMI
HIC
EAP
AFR
AFR
LCR
OECD
x
x
x
2005
2003
2006
USAID (2009)
Payet (2003)
OECD (2008)
Mali
13
Year of
Data
Source
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
Lithuania
Madagascar
Malawi2
Collection
Urban
or
Total
Income
Level
Country
OECD (2008)
Jin et al. (2006)
Hristovski et al.
(2007)
Payet (2003)
USAID (2009)
Saeed et al.
(2009)
UNEP (2002)
Samake et al.
(2009)
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
x
x
T
T
2007
2007
2007
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
Disposal
Year of
Data
2003
x
x
2003
2007
2007
Composition
Year of
Data
2000
Latvia Ministry
of Environment
(2006)
2003
METAP (2004)
2000
METAP (2004)
2004
UNEP (2007)
x
x
2005
2007
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
1996
Macedonia (1996)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2000
1995
UNSD (2009)
Source
Lithuania
Ministry of
Environment
(2005)
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
Source
Ngoc and Schnitzer
(2009)
Latvia Ministry
of Environment
(2006)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
2007
2005
UNSD (2009)
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
2007
2006
2007
x
x
2007
x
x
x
2002
METAP
(2004)
2002
METAP (2004)
2000
UNSD (2009)
Grest (2008)
Ngoc and Schnitzer
(2009)
Mongolia
LI
EAP
2001
Mongolia
Ministry of
Nature (2001)
Morocco
LMI
MENA
2002
METAP (2004)
LI
AFR
2007
Grest (2008)
2007
2000
2008
Shekdar (2009)
x
x
2004
1995
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
2005
2008
2005
UNSD (2009)
Imam et al. (2008)
OECD (2008)
2009
2000
Mozambique
14
Myanmar
UMI
EAP
2000
IPCC (2006)
Namibia2
UMI
AFR
2005
LI
SAR
2008
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua3
Niger2
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
HIC
HIC
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
HIC
OECD
OECD
LCR
AFR
AFR
OECD
MENA
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
2006
2006
2001
2005
2008
2006
1997
Pakistan15
LMI
SAR
2009
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
UMI
LMI
UMI
LCR
LCR
LCR
x
x
x
2001
2001
2001
USAID (2009)
Shekdar (2009)
per cap
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
USAID (2009)
Solomon (2009)
OECD (2008)
Al-Yousfi
Batool and
Nawaz (2009)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
Philippines
LMI
EAP
2008
Shekdar (2009)
Poland
UMI
ECA
2007
Portugal
Qatar
HIC
HIC
OECD
MENA
x
x
2006
2004
Nepal
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
OECD (2008)
UNESCWA (2007)
2003
2007
Alam et al.
(2008)
UNSD (2009)
2001
PAHO (2005)
x
x
x
T
T
T
2004
2001
2001
2001
2007
UNSD (2009)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
UNSD (2009)
x
x
x
x
2004
1999
2001
2005
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
UNSD (2009)
2004
OECD (2008)
x
x
x
2001
2001
2001
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
PAHO (2005)
2001
2000
2005
OECD (2008)
1990
UNSD (2009)
2005
OECD (2008)
2001
OECD (2008)
ANNEX
43
ANNEX C (continued)
Romania
Russian
Federation
Rwanda2
Sao Tome and
Principe2
Saudi Arabia
Senegal2
Source
Collection
Urban
or
Total
Year of
Data
Source
Disposal
Year of
Data
Source
Composition
Year of
Data
Source
2007
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
2002
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2006
Atudorei
2000
IPCC (2006)
UNSD (2009)
Denmark
Ministry
of Foreign
Affairs
Payet (2003)
Patriotic
Vanguard
(2007)
2007
UNSD (2009)
1999
UNSD (2009)
2007
Patriotic Vanguard
(2007)
Income
Level
Region
Gen- Year of
eration Data
UMI
ECA
UMI
ECA
LI
AFR
2005
USAID (2009)
LMI
AFR
2005
USAID (2009)
HIC
LI
MENA
AFR
x
x
1997
2005
Al-Yousfi
USAID (2009)
2005
2006
LI
ECA
2006
Denmark
Ministry of
Foreign Affairs
UMI
AFR
2003
Payet (2003)
2003
Sierra Leone16
LI
AFR
2007
Patriotic
Vanguard (2007)
2007
Singapore
HIC
EAP
2008
2007
UNSD (2009)
2007
UNSD (2009)
2000
Slovak Republic
HIC
OECD
2006
2007
UNSD (2009)
2005
2002
Slovenia
HIC
ECA
2007
2002
UNSD (2009)
2003
OECD (2008)
Slovenia
Ministry of the
Environment
(2006)
1994
McIntyre (2005)
x
x
2002
2008
OECD (2008)
Shekdar (2009)
2002
UNSD (2009)
Serbia1
Seychelles
Singapore
(2009)
OECD (2008)
European
Environment
Agency (2008)
Solomon Islands
LMI
EAP
1994
South Africa17
UMI
AFR
2003
Spain
Sri Lanka
St. Kitts and
Nevis3
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and
the Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland2
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab
Republic
Tajikistan
HIC
LMI
OECD
SAR
x
x
2006
2003
McIntyre (2005)
City of Cape
Town (2008)
OECD (2008)
Perera (2003)
UMI
LCR
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
UMI
LCR
2001
PAHO (2005)
2004
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
x
x
T
T
2007
2007
x
x
2005
2005
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
x
x
2005
2005
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
2002
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
METAP
(2004)
2002
METAP (2004)
2002
METAP (2004)
2005
2000
UNSD (2009)
2000
x
x
2007
1994
UMI
LCR
2001
PAHO (2005)
LMI
UMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
AFR
LCR
AFR
OECD
OECD
x
x
x
x
x
2000
2001
2005
2006
2006
IPCC (2006)
PAHO (2005)
USAID (2009)
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
LMI
MENA
2002
METAP (2004)
UMI
ECA
2001
Tanzania
LI
AFR
2005
CEROI (2001)
Kassim and Ali
(2006)
Thailand
LMI
EAP
2008
Shekdar (2009)
Togo2
Tonga
Trinidad and
Tobago
LI
LMI
AFR
EAP
x
x
2005
1994
USAID (2009)
McIntyre (2005)
HIC
LCR
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
Tunisia
LMI
MENA
2000
METAP (2004)
2000
Turkey
LMI
ECA
2006
OECD (2008)
2004
2002
Turkmenistan
Uganda18
United Arab
Emirates3
LMI
ECA
2000
LI
AFR
2004
Turkmenistan
Ministry
of Nature
Protection
(2000)
Bingh (2004)
HIC
MENA
2000
UNESCWA (2007)
Kassim and
Ali (2006)
PAHO (2005)
METAP
(2004)
Turan et al.
(2009)
Bingh (2004)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2003
UNSD (2009)
2000
METAP (2004)
2000
METAP (2004)
2004
Turan et al.
(2009)
2008
2006
UNSD (2009)
2002
Bingh (2004)
44
ANNEX C (continued)
Income
Level
Region
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Vanuatu
Venezuela, RB
HIC
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
OECD
OECD
LCR
EAP
LCR
x
x
x
x
x
2006
2006
2001
1994
2001
LI
EAP
2004
LMI
MENA
2001
METAP (2004)
Zambia19
LI
AFR
Zimbabwe2
LI
AFR
2005
Environmental
Council of
Zambia (2004)
USAID (2009)
Vietnam
West Bank and
Gaza
Gen- Year of
eration Data
Source
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
McIntyre (2005)
PAHO (2005)
World Bank
(2004)
Collection
Urban
or
Total
Year of
Data
Source
Disposal
Year of
Data
Source
x
x
x
T
T
T
2007
2005
2001
UNSD (2009)
UNSD (2009)
PAHO (2005)
x
x
x
2005
2005
2001
OECD (2008)
OECD (2008)
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
PAHO (2005)
2001
METAP
(2004)
2005
UNSD (2009)
NOTES:
1
Year for generation data is assumed to be 2006
2
Generation rates calculated using a per capita rate of 0.5kg/cap/day
3
Generation value refers to domestic waste (household) only
4
Generation rates are for urban areas only
5
Collection and disposal values are for Pnom Penh only
6
Generation rate is for Dalmatia
7
Genearation value for Mekelle City
8
Collection value is for Jakarta only
9
Generation and composition values are for Tehran
10
Population values are for 1999, the most recent year available
11
Composition values for Monrovia only
12
Generation values are for Kuala Lumpur
13
Generation and composition values are for Bamako
14
Generation and composition values are for Maputo
15
Generation and composition values are for Lahore
16
All values are for Freetown
17
Generation values are based on Cape Town per capita values
18
All values are for Kampala city only
19
Generation values are from 1996; composition values are for Lusaka only
2001
METAP (2004)
Composition
Year of
Data
Source
x
x
x
2005
2003
1994
OECD (2008)
UNSD (2009)
McIntyre (2005)
2000
2001
METAP (2004)
2007
UNSD (2009)
ANNEX
ANNEX D
Income level
Region
LI
UMI
HIC
LMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
LI
HIC
UMI
LMI
LI
LMI
LI
UMI
HIC
UMI
LMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LMI
LMI
HIC
LMI
HIC
LI
HIC
LMI
LMI
LI
HIC
LI
SAR
EAP
OECD
ECA
OECD
ECA
OECD
OECD
MENA
OECD
OECD
OECD
OECD
OECD
AFR
OECD
ECA
EAP
EAP
ECA
ECA
MENA
OECD
AFR
EAP
ECA
ECA
OECD
OECD
OECD
EAP
EAP
OECD
EAP
OECD
AFR
EAP
EAP
ECA
ECA
OECD
MENA
45
46
ANNEX E
<$876
$876-3,465
$3,466-10,725
>$10,725
0.22
0.29
0.42
0.78
43%
68%
85%
98%
Income
(GNI/capita)
Waste Generation
(tonnes/capita/yr)
Collection Efficiency
(percent collected)
Collection2
Sanitary Landfill
Open Dumping
Composting3
Waste -to-Energy
Incineration4
Anaerobic Digestion5
20-50
10-30
2-8
5-30
30-75
15-40
3-10
10-40
40-90
25-65
NA
20-75
85-250
40-100
NA
35-90
NA
40-100
60-150
70-200
NA
20-80
50-100
65-150
NOTE: This is a compilation table from several World Bank documents, discussions with the World Banks Thematic Group on Solid Waste, Carl Bartone and other industry and organizational colleagues. Costs associated with uncollected wastemore than half of all waste generated in low-income
countriesare not included.
2010 Cost6
2025 Cost
$1.5 billion
$7.7 billion
$20.1 billion
$84.1 billion
$24.5 billion
$63.5 billion
$159.3 billion
$220.2 billion
$205.4 billion
$375 billion
Source: Authors calculations with input from What a Waste report (Hoornweg and Thomas 1999) and the World Bank Solid Waste Thematic
Group and Carl Bartone.
All values provided in the table are exclusive of any potential carbon finance, subsidies, or external incentives. Costs included are for purchase
(including land), operation, maintenance, and debt service.
Collection includes pick up, transfer, and transport to final disposal site for residential and non-residential waste.
Includes sale of any net energy; excludes disposal costs of bottom and fly ash (non hazardous and hazardous).
Anaerobic digestion includes sale of energy from methane and excludes cost of residue sale and disposal.
Cost of SWM (US$) = waste generated (tonnes) X percent of waste collected (%) X [cost of collection ($/ton) + cost of disposal ($/ton)]
2010: $1.5bil = 75,000,000 tonnes X 43% X ($30/ton + $15/ton); 2025: $7.7bil = 201,000,000 tonnes X 55% X ($45/ton + $25/ton)
2010: $20.1bil = 369,000,000 tonnes X 68% X ($50/ton +$30/ton); 2025: $84.1bil = 956,000,000 tonnes X 80% X ($65/ton + $45/ton)
2010: $24.5bil = 243,000,000 tonnes X 84% X ((0.9Landfill ($65/ton + $50/ton)) + (0.1Incinerate ($65/ton + $100/ton))); 2025: $63.5bil =
426,000,000 X 92% X ((0.85Landfill ($85/ton + $65/ton)) + (0.15Incinerate($85/ton +$145/ton)))
10
2010: $159.3bil = 602,000,000 tonnes X 98% X ((0.8Landfill ($180/ton + $75/ton)) + (0.2 Incinerate ($180/ton + $150/ton))); 2025: $220.2bil =
686,000,000 tonnes X 98% X ((0.75Landfill ($210/ton + $95/ton)) + 0.25Incinerate($210/ton + $185/ton)))
ANNEX
ANNEX F
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
Africa
Benin
Parakou (UNSD 2009)
Porto Novo (Achankeng 2003)
Burkina Faso (UNSD 2009)
Ouagadougou
Burundi (Achankeng 2003)
Bujumbura
Cameroon (Achankeng 2003)
Douala
Yaounde
Congo, Rep. (Achankeng 2003)
Brazzaville
Cote dIvoire (Achankeng 2003)
Abidjan
Egypt (Achankeng 2003)
Cairo
Gambia, The (Achankeng 2003)
Banjul
Ghana
Accra (Achankeng 2003)
Kumasi (Asase 2009)
Guinea (UNSD 2009)
Conakry
Madagascar (Achankeng 2003)
Antananarivo
Mauritania (Achankeng 2003)
Nouakchott
Morocco (Achankeng 2003)
Rabat
Namibia (Achankeng 2003)
Windhoek
Niger
Niamey (Achankeng 2003)
Zinder (UNSD 2009)
Nigeria (Achankeng 2003)
Ibadan
Lagos
Rwanda (Achankeng 2003)
Kigali
Senegal (Achankeng 2003)
Dakar
Tanzania (Achankeng 2003)
Dar es Salaam
Togo (Achankeng 2003)
Lome
Tunisia (Achankeng 2003)
Tunis
Uganda (Achankeng 2003)
Kampala
Zambia (UNSD 2009)
Lusaka
Zimbabwe (UNSD 2009)
Harare
2002
1993
148,450
0.59
0.50
87,671
88
2002
876,200
0.79
692,635
693
1993
1.40
1993
0.70
1993
0.80
1993
0.60
1993
1.00
1993
0.50
1993
0.30
1993
2006
1,610,867
0.40
0.60
966,520
967
2007
3,000,000
0.24
725,274
725
69,430
69
1993
0.30
1993
0.90
1993
0.60
1993
0.70
1993
2006
242,800a
1.00
0.29
1993
1993
1.10
0.30
1993
0.60
1993
0.70
1993
1.00
1993
1.90
1993
0.50
1993
6.00
2005
1,300,000
0.90
1,171,994
1,172
2005
2,500,000
0.08
207,500
208
47
48
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
1,453,000
1,319,000
10,839,000
957,000
3,093,000
1,374,000
1,775,000
886,000
3,294,000
1,087,000
4,900,000
2,628,000
1,076,000
1,165,000
1,319,000
1,413,000
785,000
1,025,000
1,397,000
3,893,000
2,533,000
1,996,000
1,780,000
2,928,000
1,242,000
799,000
1,600,000
1,232,000
814,000
1,354,000
978,000
772,000
1,077,000
874,000
791,000
1,435,000
2,568,000
1,153,000
1,019,000
834,000
949,000
769,000
1,701,000
1,730,000
1,137,000
891,000
2,498,000
1,818,000
2,023,000
1,451,000
1,065,000
801,000
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
1,307,701
1,187,101
9,755,101
861,301
2,783,701
1,236,600
1,597,501
797,400
2,964,600
978,301
4,410,000
2,365,200
968,400
1,048,501
1,187,101
1,271,701
706,501
922,501
1,257,301
3,503,701
2,279,701
1,796,400
1,602,000
2,635,200
1,117,800
719,101
1,440,000
1,108,800
732,600
1,218,600
880,200
694,800
969,301
786,600
711,901
1,291,501
2,311,200
1,037,701
917,101
750,600
854,101
692,101
1,530,901
1,557,000
1,023,301
801,901
2,248,200
1,636,200
1,820,701
1,305,901
958,501
720,901
1,308
1,187
9,755
861
2,784
1,237
1,598
797
2,965
978
4,410
2,365
968
1,049
1,187
1,272
707
923
1,257
3,504
2,280
1,796
1,602
2,635
1,118
719
1,440
1,109
733
1,219
880
695
969
787
712
1,292
2,311
1,038
917
751
854
692
1,531
1,557
1,023
802
2,248
1,636
1,821
1,306
959
721
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Nanchang, Jiangxi
Nanjing, Jiangsu
Neijiang, Sichuan
Ningbo, Zhejiang
Pingxiang, Jiangxi
Qingdao, Shandong
Qiqihar, Heilongjiang
Shanghai, Shanghai
Shantou, Guangdong
Shenyang, Liaoning
Shenzhen, Guangdong
Shijianzhuang, Hebei
Suining, Sichuan
Suqian, Jiangsu
Suzhou, Jiangsu
Taian, Shandong
Taiyuan, Shanxi
Tangshan, Hebei
Tianjin, Tianjin
Tianmen, Hubei
Tianshui, Gansu
Tongliao, Jilin
Wanxian, Chongqing
Weifang, Shandong
Wenzhou, Zhejiang
Wuhan, Hubei
Wulumuqi, Xinjiang
Wuxi, Jiangsu
Xian, Shaanxi
Xiangxiang, Hunan
Xiantao, Hubei
Xianyang, Shaanxi
Xiaoshan, Zhejiang
Xinghua, Jiangsu
Xintai, Hebei
Xinyi, Jiangsu
Xinyu, Guangdong
Xuanzhou, Anhui
Xuzhou, Jiangsu
Yancheng, Jiangsu
Yichun, Jiangxi
Yichun, Jilin
Yixing, Jiangsu
Yiyang, Hunan
Yongzhou, Hunan
Yueyang, Hunan
Yulin, Guangxi
Yuyao, Zhejiang
Yuzhou, Henan
Zaoyang, Hubei
Zaozhuang, Shandong
Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu
Zhangjiakou, Hebei
Zhanjiang, Guangdong
Zhaodong, Heilongjiang
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
2000
Urban
Population
1,722,000
2,740,000
1,393,000
1,173,000
1,502,000
2,316,000
1,435,000
12,887,000
1,176,000
4,828,000
1,131,000
1,603,000
1,428,000
1,189,000
1,183,000
1,503,000
2,415,000
1,671,000
9,156,000
1,779,000
1,187,000
785,000
1,759,000
1,287,000
1,269,000
5,169,000
1,415,000
1,127,000
3,123,000
908,000
1,614,000
896,000
1,124,000
1,556,000
1,325,000
973,000
808,000
823,000
1,636,000
1,562,000
871,000
904,000
1,108,000
1,343,000
1,097,000
1,213,000
1,558,000
848,000
1,173,000
1,121,000
2,048,000
886,000
880,000
1,368,000
851,000
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
1,549,800
2,466,000
1,253,701
1,055,701
1,351,800
2,084,400
1,291,501
11,598,301
1,058,400
4,345,200
1,017,901
1,442,701
1,285,200
1,070,101
1,064,701
1,352,701
2,173,501
1,503,901
8,240,400
1,601,101
1,068,301
706,501
1,583,101
1,158,301
1,142,101
4,652,101
1,273,501
1,014,301
2,810,701
817,200
1,452,600
806,400
1,011,600
1,400,400
1,192,501
875,701
727,200
740,701
1,472,400
1,405,800
783,901
813,600
997,200
1,208,701
987,301
1,091,701
1,402,200
763,200
1,055,701
1,008,901
1,843,200
797,400
792,000
1,231,200
765,901
Total Waste
(tons/day)
1,550
2,466
1,254
1,056
1,352
2,084
1,292
11,598
1,058
4,345
1,018
1,443
1,285
1,070
1,065
1,353
2,174
1,504
8,240
1,601
1,068
707
1,583
1,158
1,142
4,652
1,274
1,014
2,811
817
1,453
806
1,012
1,400
1,193
876
727
741
1,472
1,406
784
814
997
1,209
987
1,092
1,402
763
1,056
1,009
1,843
797
792
1,231
766
49
50
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2000
2000
2000
2,070,000
2,675,000
1,072,000
0.90
0.90
0.90
1,863,000
2,407,501
964,800
1,863
2,408
965
2007
6,926,000
2.47
17,128,767
17,129
2007
525,760
1.51
792,932
793
2005
8,962,000
0.88
7,896,024
7,896
4,974,766
3,728,911
4,975
3,729
2007
1,660,714
3.00
2005
2,392,701
1.56
Eastern Europe & Central Asia (UNSD 2009)
2007
1,532,000
1.01
1,549,467
1,549
2007
1,806,200
1.21
2,181,918
2,182
2006
784,900
1.24
974,904
975
605,391
568,133
1,064,384
605
568
1,064
2007
303,200
2.00
2007
185,960
3.06
2007
1,300,000
0.82
Latin America and the Caribbean (PAHO 2005)
2001
2001
2001
2001
12,544,018
285,000
202,518
472,971
1.16
0.88
0.95
0.49
14,551,061
249,660
192,392
232,040
14,551
250
192
232
2001
200,000
2.67
534,000
534
2001
268,792
0.95
255,352
255
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
717,026
629,955
790,353
201,230
135,783
1,113,000
193,876
135,783
0.60
0.36
0.53
0.33
0.33
0.54
0.40
0.46
430,216
226,784
419,677
66,406
45,352
599,907
77,357
62,868
430
227
420
66
45
600
77
63
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
119,152
105,746
130,095
183,968
182,593
393,569
288,085
119,247
336,392
107,827
461,534
169,254
0.29
0.44
0.58
1.14
0.95
1.27
0.62
0.75
0.30
0.88
0.89
0.74
35,000
47,000
76,000
210,000
173,900
500,000
180,000
89,200
102,000
95,000
410,000
125,000
35
47
76
210
174
500
180
89
102
95
410
125
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Araguaina
Araguari
Arapiraca
Araraquara
Araras
Atibaia
Bage
Barbacena
Barra Mansa
Barreiras
Barretos
Barueri
Bauru
Belem
Belford Roxo
Belo Horizonte
Betim
Blumenau
Boa Vista
Botucatu
Braganca Paulista
Brasilia
Cabo de Santo Agostinho
Cabo Frio
Cachoeirinha
Cachoeiro de Itapemirim
Camacari
Camaragibe
Campina Grande
Campinas
Campo Grande
Campos dos Goytacazes
Canoas
Carapicuiba
Cariacica
Caruaru
Cascavel
Castanhal
Catanduva
Caucaia
Caxias
Caxias do Sul
Chapeco
Colatina
Colombo
Contagem
Cotia
Crato
Criciuma
Cubatao
Curitiba
Diadema
Dourados
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Urban
Population
113,143
101,974
186,466
182,471
104,196
111,300
118,767
114,126
170,753
131,849
103,913
208,281
316,064
1,280,614
434,474
2,238,526
306,675
261,808
200,568
108,306
125,031
2,051,146
152,977
126,828
107,564
174,879
161,727
128,702
355,331
969,396
663,621
406,989
306,093
344,596
324,285
253,634
245,369
134,496
105,847
250,479
139,756
360,419
146,967
112,711
183,329
538,017
148,987
104,646
170,420
108,309
1,587,315
357,064
164,949
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
0.53
0.88
0.99
0.87
0.72
1.49
0.42
0.83
0.76
1.76
0.76
1.87
1.39
1.57
0.81
1.43
0.49
0.84
0.57
1.41
1.03
0.76
0.92
1.58
1.17
1.03
0.99
1.01
1.35
1.69
0.75
0.73
0.68
0.73
1.05
0.79
0.59
0.40
0.94
0.73
0.76
0.92
0.49
0.71
0.39
1.86
0.78
0.33
0.56
0.85
0.75
0.79
1.33
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
59,500
90,000
185,000
158,400
75,000
165,700
50,000
95,200
130,000
232,200
79,200
390,000
440,000
2,012,000
350,000
3,201,800
150,000
220,000
115,000
153,000
128,500
1,556,700
140,000
200,000
125,400
180,000
160,000
130,000
480,000
1,641,000
496,400
296,000
207,000
250,000
340,000
200,000
145,000
54,000
100,000
183,000
106,600
330,000
72,200
80,000
72,000
1,000,000
116,700
35,000
96,000
92,000
1,186,700
281,600
219,000
Total Waste
(tons/day)
60
90
185
158
75
166
50
95
130
232
79
390
440
2,012
350
3,202
150
220
115
153
129
1,557
140
200
125
180
160
130
480
1,641
496
296
207
250
340
200
145
54
100
183
107
330
72
80
72
1,000
117
35
96
92
1,187
282
219
51
52
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Urban
Population
775,456
207,663
480,949
142,377
342,315
2,141,402
258,543
287,737
133,738
108,122
117,749
1,093,007
247,131
232,629
155,161
104,219
264,812
1,072,717
152,523
133,044
222,127
230,566
147,050
212,496
187,479
196,675
147,494
129,685
125,559
162,433
272,942
135,366
581,556
191,291
108,489
112,104
147,202
106,800
597,934
429,604
174,567
212,133
456,796
323,397
157,682
113,543
249,046
112,617
447,065
141,082
132,461
283,308
797,759
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
0.94
0.67
1.56
0.58
1.27
1.11
0.75
0.95
0.82
0.59
1.66
1.17
1.21
0.55
0.53
0.58
0.98
0.79
0.62
0.83
0.36
0.98
0.61
0.94
0.62
1.27
0.95
0.66
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.96
0.77
0.63
0.72
1.03
0.48
0.66
1.72
1.15
1.18
1.08
0.64
1.02
0.51
0.79
0.64
0.57
1.61
0.71
1.89
1.34
1.32
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
730,000
140,000
750,800
83,000
435,000
2,375,000
195,000
273,000
109,100
64,000
195,000
1,279,700
300,000
127,100
83,000
60,000
260,600
850,000
95,000
110,000
80,000
227,000
90,400
200,000
116,000
250,000
140,000
85,500
62,200
98,000
190,000
130,000
450,000
120,000
78,000
115,400
70,000
70,000
1,027,900
493,200
206,000
230,000
290,500
330,200
80,000
90,000
159,500
64,000
720,000
100,000
250,000
380,000
1,050,000
Total Waste
(tons/day)
730
140
751
83
435
2,375
195
273
109
64
195
1,280
300
127
83
60
261
850
95
110
80
227
90
200
116
250
140
86
62
98
190
130
450
120
78
115
70
70
1,028
493
206
230
291
330
80
90
160
64
720
100
250
380
1,050
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Urban
Population
205,830
1,405,835
168,020
179,732
197,342
288,653
363,392
124,228
330,241
306,947
213,841
712,317
153,712
459,451
131,679
173,418
920,599
236,193
367,902
652,593
102,742
137,355
127,339
132,282
124,690
168,458
123,881
262,237
323,158
218,538
286,537
126,026
102,985
329,158
135,627
273,616
1,360,590
334,661
106,776
193,582
189,186
121,993
1,422,905
104,549
246,846
104,508
504,923
253,059
168,218
5,857,904
186,544
116,552
150,227
115,352
2,443,107
170,078
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
1.04
1.55
0.31
0.64
0.98
0.98
0.64
0.67
0.63
1.51
0.71
1.72
1.63
1.47
0.38
0.81
0.75
0.66
1.05
0.87
0.24
0.59
1.10
0.94
0.40
0.60
0.66
0.76
0.56
0.64
1.05
0.99
0.58
0.73
0.66
1.03
0.98
0.58
0.84
0.93
0.53
0.53
0.97
0.97
0.97
1.71
0.89
0.56
0.74
1.20
1.29
0.87
0.55
0.52
1.08
0.83
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
215,000
2,180,000
52,000
115,000
192,500
284,000
232,700
83,000
208,100
462,000
151,500
1,223,000
250,000
675,300
50,500
140,000
693,900
155,000
385,600
570,000
25,000
81,000
140,000
125,000
50,000
101,300
82,000
200,000
180,000
140,000
300,000
125,000
60,000
239,700
90,000
280,900
1,340,000
193,400
90,000
180,900
100,000
64,500
1,376,000
101,000
240,000
179,000
450,000
141,200
125,100
7,058,700
240,000
101,300
82,000
60,200
2,636,500
141,000
Total Waste
(tons/day)
215
2,180
52
115
193
284
233
83
208
462
152
1,223
250
675
51
140
694
155
386
570
25
81
140
125
50
101
82
200
180
140
300
125
60
240
90
281
1,340
193
90
181
100
65
1,376
101
240
179
450
141
125
7,059
240
101
82
60
2,637
141
53
54
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
107,632
184,903
243,611
115,844
262,538
649,331
417,983
703,177
140,159
192,998
891,119
449,476
173,559
107,384
358,523
539,313
204,316
193,547
870,028
10,434,252
303,551
122,751
321,181
184,871
155,276
493,468
196,723
228,690
197,644
244,165
107,486
129,424
715,360
138,081
129,692
252,051
501,214
126,936
108,998
215,298
227,429
345,965
292,304
262,494
117,609
242,063
0.51
0.49
0.66
0.65
0.51
0.99
1.10
0.81
1.43
0.69
0.70
0.69
1.18
0.47
1.03
1.23
0.69
0.52
0.85
2.00
0.96
0.59
1.12
0.78
0.89
0.92
0.91
0.58
0.84
0.67
0.88
0.40
1.48
0.83
0.33
1.55
0.90
0.79
1.03
0.58
0.77
0.95
1.08
1.32
1.36
0.66
55,000
91,300
160,000
75,000
133,700
640,000
460,000
566,700
200,000
133,300
620,000
312,000
205,000
50,000
367,900
661,600
140,000
100,000
740,000
20,855,700
290,000
73,000
358,700
145,000
138,000
455,000
180,000
133,000
167,000
162,500
95,000
52,000
1,058,900
115,000
42,200
391,000
451,600
100,000
112,000
125,000
175,000
330,000
315,000
346,000
160,000
160,000
55
91
160
75
134
640
460
567
200
133
620
312
205
50
368
662
140
100
740
20,856
290
73
359
145
138
455
180
133
167
163
95
52
1,059
115
42
391
452
100
112
125
175
330
315
346
160
160
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
318,779
138,402
245,347
214,344
161,953
216,061
250,348
0.80
0.65
1.03
0.80
1.00
0.80
0.94
255,023
89,961
252,707
171,475
161,953
172,849
235,327
255
90
253
171
162
173
235
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
163,036
160,148
145,475
175,938
140,559
120,874
120,299
203,231
148,312
365,674
190,085
468,390
120,874
148,220
200,792
185,268
275,982
286,931
0.90
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.42
0.80
1.00
0.95
1.00
1.00
0.68
1.01
1.40
1.21
1.63
0.71
1.00
0.96
146,732
152,141
145,475
175,938
59,035
96,699
120,299
193,069
148,460
365,674
129,258
472,137
169,224
179,346
327,893
131,540
275,982
275,454
147
152
145
176
59
97
120
193
148
366
129
472
169
179
328
132
276
275
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
293,000
183,000
1,276,000
353,000
6,558,000
543,000
230,000
113,000
2,181,000
854,000
129,000
644,000
166,000
145,000
116,000
232,000
117,000
403,000
246,000
115,000
345,000
1,909,000
256,000
317,000
234,000
349,000
401,000
206,000
382,000
234,000
285,000
114,000
310,000
0.58
0.60
0.80
0.49
0.72
0.55
0.65
0.61
0.77
0.87
0.44
0.46
0.40
0.31
1.04
0.50
1.02
0.63
0.62
0.60
0.72
0.81
0.60
0.80
0.66
0.61
0.58
0.67
0.72
0.51
0.88
0.38
0.60
169,940
109,800
1,020,800
172,970
4,721,760
298,650
149,500
68,930
1,679,370
742,980
56,760
296,240
66,400
44,950
120,640
116,000
119,340
253,890
152,520
69,000
248,400
1,546,290
153,600
253,600
154,440
212,890
232,580
138,020
275,040
119,340
250,800
43,320
186,000
170
110
1,021
173
4,722
299
150
69
1,679
743
57
296
66
45
121
116
119
254
153
69
248
1,546
154
254
154
213
233
138
275
119
251
43
186
55
56
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
157,000
112,000
278,000
289,000
0.75
0.79
0.85
0.51
117,750
88,480
236,300
147,390
118
88
236
147
2001
2001
2001
234,737
203,770
326,384
0.85
1.38
1.02
199,526
281,203
332,585
200
281
333
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
154,832
308,288
118,935
154,897
2,186,632
222,217
268,843
110,846
133,177
162,078
109,220
220,345
452,307
144,381
0.44
0.50
0.41
0.75
0.75
0.56
0.50
0.44
0.60
0.60
0.58
0.58
0.50
0.47
67,662
154,144
48,763
116,173
1,639,974
124,442
134,422
48,440
79,906
97,247
63,348
127,800
226,154
67,859
68
154
49
116
1,640
124
134
48
80
97
63
128
226
68
2001
2001
1,841,200
200,421
0.72
0.65
1,325,664
130,274
1,326
130
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
136,909
172,203
139,802
115,358
172,548
285,286
479,605
167,975
0.70
0.82
0.54
0.51
0.61
0.57
0.81
0.63
95,836
141,206
75,493
58,833
105,254
162,613
388,480
105,824
96
141
75
59
105
163
388
106
2001
95,551
0.85
81,218
81
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
248,019
2,541,581
130,000
122,157
366,735
130,118
1.20
0.95
0.90
0.90
0.80
0.85
297,623
2,414,502
117,000
109,941
293,388
110,600
298
2,415
117
110
293
111
2001
180,000
1.53
275,400
275
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
141,061
416,301
143,803
335,866
167,599
0.60
0.60
0.30
0.60
0.30
84,637
249,781
43,141
201,520
50,280
85
250
43
202
50
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
138,480
138,504
121,221
105,806
152,845
143,452
125,433
126,474
113,191
1,100,085
164,868
124,603
0.30
0.60
0.30
0.25
0.30
0.60
0.25
0.35
0.40
0.60
0.30
0.30
41,544
83,102
36,366
26,452
45,854
86,071
31,358
44,266
45,276
660,051
49,460
37,381
42
83
36
26
46
86
31
44
45
660
49
37
2001
2001
2001
2001
126,402
819,867
126,721
483,384
0.70
0.67
0.63
0.69
88,481
549,311
79,834
333,535
88
549
80
334
2001
357,265
1.00
357,265
357
2001
2001
159,974
452,724
0.89
1.00
142,377
452,724
142
453
2001
1,458,155
1.00
1,458,155
1,458
2001
331,190
1.00
331,190
331
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
728,010
117,271
656,245
130,425
108,466
297,776
475,683
117,929
135,875
219,281
444,870
219,414
169,784
388,012
232,956
209,241
676,160
197,275
268,673
131,268
107,065
178,672
125,105
155,363
342,374
755,017
117,215
130,748
0.94
0.89
0.80
0.85
0.53
1.17
0.80
0.53
0.92
0.94
0.94
0.53
0.94
0.94
1.20
0.94
0.97
0.94
0.94
0.95
0.52
0.60
0.54
1.27
0.92
0.90
0.92
0.53
685,785
104,019
522,371
110,340
57,704
348,398
380,546
62,974
124,733
207,001
418,178
116,948
159,937
364,731
279,547
196,896
658,580
186,030
252,015
124,048
55,995
107,739
67,056
197,311
316,354
677,250
107,838
69,035
686
104
522
110
58
348
381
63
125
207
418
117
160
365
280
197
659
186
252
124
56
108
67
197
316
677
108
69
57
58
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Urban
Population
495,962
1,655,225
381,747
183,941
246,166
276,085
1,650,776
679,230
109,179
144,166
279,878
129,236
619,185
101,390
106,922
198,564
125,395
445,778
1,264,121
199,712
128,407
174,205
1,153,998
113,705
103,909
113,727
362,442
184,289
111,671
127,443
427,966
385,047
714,689
197,699
779,523
8,615,955
144,574
194,458
1,112,636
628,801
861,173
141,412
1,223,180
164,819
317,877
259,343
357,857
119,405
249,838
130,398
152,318
1,372,446
191,424
657,447
438,696
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
0.93
1.28
0.93
0.53
1.18
0.94
1.20
1.18
0.95
0.92
0.94
1.05
0.99
0.76
0.54
1.13
0.93
0.95
1.22
1.42
0.54
0.92
1.10
0.85
1.13
0.50
1.00
0.85
0.54
0.95
0.98
0.94
0.99
1.13
0.94
1.38
0.54
0.98
1.19
0.89
1.20
0.94
1.28
0.94
1.47
0.92
0.94
0.98
0.80
0.94
1.05
1.38
0.71
0.83
0.76
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
461,245
2,118,688
355,025
98,041
289,245
258,139
1,980,931
801,491
103,174
132,921
263,925
135,698
615,470
76,752
57,310
224,377
116,994
423,489
1,543,492
283,591
68,955
160,965
1,269,398
96,649
117,417
56,864
362,442
155,908
59,967
121,071
419,407
361,944
705,398
223,400
733,531
11,890,018
78,070
190,569
1,324,037
556,489
1,033,408
132,927
1,565,670
154,930
467,279
237,818
336,386
117,256
198,621
122,574
159,934
1,893,975
135,528
542,394
333,409
Total Waste
(tons/day)
461
2,119
355
98
289
258
1,981
801
103
133
264
136
615
77
57
224
117
423
1,543
284
69
161
1,269
97
117
57
362
156
60
121
419
362
705
223
734
11,890
78
191
1,324
556
1,033
133
1,566
155
467
238
336
117
199
123
160
1,894
136
542
333
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
104,620
228,239
587,730
143,235
135,731
100,805
134,895
184,679
678,645
147,912
123,072
138,393
497,078
127,254
231,809
134,539
185,063
298,063
276,743
100,889
101,049
233,807
121,076
307,550
1,262,520
128,339
722,279
480,844
687,969
350,648
533,457
124,461
126,257
443,782
268,208
330,885
130,553
147,086
463,812
266,612
531,511
404,788
124,722
161,425
1,018,447
139,514
0.76
0.62
0.86
0.54
0.92
0.54
0.53
0.50
0.97
0.94
0.80
0.52
1.20
1.10
1.20
0.53
0.53
0.85
0.94
0.94
0.53
0.91
0.53
0.84
1.22
1.05
1.04
1.17
1.16
1.18
0.94
0.92
0.54
1.05
0.94
1.20
0.54
0.94
0.92
0.94
0.87
0.80
0.95
0.71
1.20
0.53
79,511
141,508
502,509
77,060
125,008
54,031
71,899
92,340
658,286
139,037
98,458
71,964
596,494
139,979
277,012
71,306
97,528
252,161
259,862
94,836
53,556
212,998
64,049
256,804
1,537,749
134,756
749,726
562,587
798,044
413,765
502,516
115,002
67,926
463,752
252,920
397,062
70,107
137,967
425,779
251,415
462,415
323,830
117,862
113,966
1,222,136
73,942
80
142
503
77
125
54
72
92
658
139
98
72
596
140
277
71
98
252
260
95
54
213
64
257
1,538
135
750
563
798
414
503
115
68
464
253
397
70
138
426
251
462
324
118
114
1,222
74
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
124,107
147,845
952,068
115,369
108,861
0.61
0.62
0.71
0.61
0.43
75,085
90,925
676,920
70,029
46,266
75
91
677
70
46
59
60
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
149,918
708,438
174,059
124,656
293,745
0.66
0.94
0.94
0.70
0.61
98,946
665,932
163,615
87,259
179,184
99
666
164
87
179
2001
2001
2001
2001
513,399
223,350
170,433
202,745
1.31
1.04
1.08
1.07
673,579
232,507
184,068
217,748
674
233
184
218
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
449,282
148,767
165,357
112,203
410,734
153,112
264,645
469,747
166,902
200,365
125,034
205,554
286,202
344,164
123,142
183,861
192,449
122,270
751,155
387,641
448,345
134,908
148,752
251,567
364,476
341,971
106,926
246,856
0.81
0.68
0.73
0.64
0.56
0.57
0.58
0.52
0.62
0.70
1.20
1.08
1.13
0.59
0.52
0.50
0.59
1.05
0.60
0.71
0.79
0.78
0.54
0.87
0.56
0.55
0.61
0.70
365,716
101,162
121,207
72,147
228,368
87,733
154,023
244,268
103,479
139,454
150,541
222,409
324,267
203,745
64,034
91,379
112,968
128,261
452,195
274,837
352,399
105,363
80,177
219,618
202,649
186,716
64,690
173,787
366
101
121
72
228
88
154
244
103
139
151
222
324
204
64
91
113
128
452
275
352
105
80
220
203
187
65
174
2001
162,157
1.18
191,345
191
2001
106,916
0.34
36,351
36
2001
287,131
1.00
287,131
287
2001
2001
2001
2001
162,779
105,720
157,295
203,975
0.70
0.70
3.20
2.20
113,945
74,004
503,344
448,745
114
74
503
449
ANNEX
ANNEX F (continued)
Year
2001
2001
2001
Urban
Population
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
539,130
137,390
1,303,182
2001
1,836,286
2001
283,273
2001
704,168
2001
103,706
2001
396,125
2001
895,989
2001
144,345
2001
1,405,933
2001
283,273
2001
147,800
Middle East & North Africa
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
0.90
0.90
1.23
485,217
123,651
1,602,914
485
124
1,603
1.10
0.69
0.74
0.85
2.93
0.52
1.50
1.08
0.28
1.15
2,019,915
194,325
521,084
88,150
1,160,646
468,602
216,518
1,518,408
80,166
169,970
2,020
194
521
88
1,161
469
217
1,518
80
170
2007
7,765,000
1.77
13,766,234
13,766
2005
8,203,666
0.88
7,044,000
7,044
2005
6,784,000
South Asia
1.71
11,621,432
11,621
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
189,998
1,275,135
3,520,085
228,280
975,393
966,862
475,439
4,301,326
1,437,354
648,032
808,515
4,343,645
930,882
426,674
10,306,452
199,258
1,055,938
195,985
11,978,450
809,895
3,843,585
221,492
1,474,968
932,484
2,322,575
369,959
1,104,713
2,551,337
595,575
0.40
0.51
0.37
0.25
0.52
0.45
0.44
0.39
0.40
0.36
0.40
0.62
0.57
0.31
0.57
0.39
0.42
0.22
0.45
0.20
0.57
0.19
0.38
0.23
0.39
0.58
0.31
0.43
0.67
75,999
650,319
1,302,431
57,070
507,204
435,088
209,193
1,677,517
574,942
233,292
323,406
2,693,060
530,603
132,269
5,874,678
77,711
443,494
43,117
5,390,303
161,979
2,190,843
42,083
560,488
214,471
905,804
214,576
342,461
1,097,075
399,035
76
650
1,302
57
507
435
209
1,678
575
233
323
2,693
531
132
5,875
78
443
43
5,390
162
2,191
42
560
214
906
215
342
1,097
399
61
62
ANNEX F (continued)
Generation Rate
(kg/capita/day)
Total MSW
Generated (kg/day)
Total Waste
(tons/day)
City
Year
Kolkata
Lucknow
Ludhiana
Madurai
Meerut
Nagpur
Nashik
Patna
Pondicherry
Pune
Raipur
Rajkot
Ranchi
Shillong
Simla
Srinagar
Surat
Tiruvanantapuram
Vadodara
Varanasi
Vijaywada
Vishakhapatnam
Nepal (Alam 2008)
Kathmandu
Sri Lanka (UNSD 2009)
Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia
Moratuwa
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
4,572,876
2,185,927
1,398,467
928,868
1,068,772
2,052,066
1,077,236
1,366,444
220,865
2,538,473
605,747
967,476
847,093
132,867
142,555
898,440
2,433,835
744,983
1,306,227
1,091,918
851,282
982,904
0.58
0.22
0.53
0.30
0.46
0.25
0.19
0.37
0.59
0.46
0.30
0.21
0.25
0.34
0.27
0.48
0.41
0.23
0.27
0.39
0.44
0.59
2,652,268
480,904
741,188
278,660
491,635
513,017
204,675
505,584
130,310
1,167,698
181,724
203,170
211,773
45,175
38,490
431,251
997,872
171,346
352,681
425,848
374,564
579,913
2,652
481
741
279
492
513
205
506
130
1,168
182
203
212
45
38
431
998
171
353
426
375
580
2003
738,173
0.31
226,800
227
2007
2007
209,787
189,790
0.73
0.67
154,110
127,854
154
128
NOTES:
* Denotes domestic waste data as MSW figures are unknown.
PAHO defines municipal waste and domestic waste as follows:
PAHO definitions:
Municipal waste
Solid or semi-solid waste generated in of population centers including domestic and commercial wastes, as well as those originated by the,
small-scale industries and institutions (including hospital and clinics); markets street sweeping, and from public cleansing.
Domestic waste
Domestic solid or semi-solid waste generated by human activities a the household level.
** China cities have populations over 750,000 inhabitants
ANNEX
ANNEX G
Year
Urban Population
Africa
Benin (UNSD 2009)
Parakou
2002
148,450
10
1995
876,200
51
2005
1,720,000
43
2003
800,000
15 - 20
2002
2,777,000
30 - 40
2007
3,000,000
76
2006
2,312,000
30 - 45
N/A
611,883
20 - 30
2007
242,800
77
2003
1,708,000
30 - 40
N/A
2,500,000
48
2002
1,000,000
42
2005
1,300,000
18
2007
2,500,000
99
2007
6,926,000
100
2007
525,760
100
2004
8,962,000
83
2007
1,660,714
95
2007
1,532,000
90
2007
1,806,200
100
2006
784,900
100
2007
2007
2007
1,300,000
303,200
185,960
100
62
95
63
64
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
2001
12,544,018
Bahia Blanca
2001
285,000
100
100
Cordoba
2001
1,283,396
100
Neuquen
2001
202,518
100
Parana
2001
245,677
100
Rafaela
2001
100,000
100
Rio Cuarto
2001
154,127
100
Rosario
2001
906,004
100
Salta Capital
2001
472,971
100
2001
200,000
100
2001
268,792
100
90
Bahamas
Nassau, Bahamas
Barbados*
Barbados
Bolivia*
Cochabamba
2001
717,026
El Alto
2001
629,955
76
La Paz
2001
790,353
87
Oruro
2001
201,230
92
Potosi
2001
135,783
88
2001
1,113,000
88
Sucre
2001
193,876
85
Tarija
2001
135,783
93
2001
318,779
99
Chile
Antofagasta, Antofagasta
Antofagasta, Calama
2001
138,402
100
Araucana, Temuco
2001
245,347
100
B.OHiggins, Rancagua
2001
214,344
100
Biobo, Chilln
2001
161,953
100
Biobo, Concepcin
2001
216,061
100
Biobo, Talcahuano
2001
250,348
100
Coquimbo, Coquimbo
2001
163,036
100
Coquimbo, La Serena
2001
160,148
100
2001
145,475
100
2001
175,938
100
2001
140,559
100
2001
120,874
100
Maule, Curic
2001
120,299
100
Maule, Talca
2001
203,231
100
2001
148,312
100
Santiago, La Florida
2001
365,674
100
Santiago, La Pintana
2001
190,085
100
Santiago, Maip
2001
468,390
100
Santiago, Providencia
2001
120,874
100
Santiago, Recoleta
2001
148,220
100
Santiago, Santiago
2001
200,792
100
Tarapac, Arica
2001
185,268
100
Valparaso, Valparaso
2001
275,982
100
2001
286,931
100
ANNEX
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
Colombia
Armenia
2001
293,000
100
Barrancabermeja
2001
183,000
100
100
Barranquilla
2001
1,276,000
Bello
2001
353,000
97
Bogot
2001
6,558,000
100
100
Bucaramanga
2001
543,000
Buenaventura
2001
230,000
80
Buga
2001
113,000
100
Cali
2001
2,181,000
97
Cartagena
2001
854,000
97
Cartago
2001
129,000
98
Ccuta
2001
644,000
100
84
Dosquebradas
2001
166,000
Envigado
2001
145,000
99
Florencia
2001
116,000
80
Floridablanca
2001
232,000
95
Girardot
2001
117,000
95
Ibagu
2001
403,000
97
Itag
2001
246,000
98
Maicao
2001
115,000
100
Manizales
2001
345,000
100
Medelln
2001
1,909,000
100
Montera
2001
256,000
100
Neiva
2001
317,000
98
Palmira
2001
234,000
100
100
Pasto
2001
349,000
Pereira
2001
401,000
94
Popayn
2001
206,000
98
Santa Marta
2001
382,000
97
Sincelejo
2001
234,000
100
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
285,000
114,000
310,000
157,000
112,000
278,000
289,000
95
81
100
100
100
98
98
2001
2001
2001
234,737
203,770
326,384
82
40
100
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
154,832
308,288
118,935
154,897
2,186,632
222,217
268,843
110,846
100
100
100
97
100
100
100
100
Soacha
Sogamoso
Soledad
Tulu
Tunja
Valledupar
Villavicencio
Costa Rica
Alajuela
Desamparados
San Jos
Cuba
Bayamo
Camagey
Ciego de vila
Cienfuegos
Ciudad de La Habana
Guantnamo
Holgun
Manzanillo
65
66
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
133,177
162,078
109,220
220,345
452,307
144,381
100
100
91
98
100
100
2001
2001
2001
201,700
2,774,926
244,039
100
60
90
2001
2001
1,841,200
200,421
80
83
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
136,909
172,203
139,802
115,358
172,548
285,286
479,605
167,975
94
82
73
50
85
95
81
83
2001
95,551
100
2001
2001
2001
2001
248,019
2,541,581
122,157
366,735
80
70
90
80
2001
180,000
100
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
141,061
416,301
143,803
335,866
138,480
138,504
152,845
143,452
1,100,085
164,868
45
16
40
16
45
80
45
22
22
45
2001
483,384
85
2001
2001
2001
2001
357,265
452,724
1,458,155
331,190
56
68
66
48
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
728,010
117,271
656,245
130,425
108,466
297,776
85
85
90
85
85
100
ANNEX
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
475,683
117,929
135,875
219,281
444,870
219,414
169,784
388,012
232,956
209,241
676,160
197,275
268,673
131,268
107,065
178,672
125,105
155,363
342,374
755,017
117,215
130,748
495,962
1,655,225
381,747
183,941
246,166
276,085
1,650,776
679,230
109,179
144,166
279,878
129,236
619,185
101,390
106,922
198,564
125,395
445,778
1,264,121
199,712
128,407
174,205
1,153,998
113,705
103,909
113,727
362,442
184,289
111,671
127,443
427,966
385,047
714,689
197,699
67
68
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
779,523
8,615,955
144,574
194,458
1,112,636
628,801
861,173
141,412
1,223,180
164,819
317,877
259,343
357,857
119,405
249,838
130,398
152,318
1,372,446
191,424
657,447
438,696
104,620
228,239
587,730
143,235
135,731
100,805
134,895
184,679
678,645
147,912
123,072
138,393
497,078
127,254
231,809
134,539
185,063
298,063
276,743
100,889
101,049
233,807
121,076
307,550
1,262,520
128,339
722,279
480,844
687,969
350,648
533,457
124,461
126,257
ANNEX
ANNEX G (continued)
City
Year
Urban Population
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
443,782
268,208
330,885
130,553
147,086
463,812
266,612
531,511
404,788
124,722
161,425
1,018,447
139,514
85
85
80
85
85
90
90
80
90
85
90
90
85
2001
2001
2001
124,107
147,845
952,068
80
70
80
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
149,918
708,438
174,059
124,656
293,745
63
80
66
64
95
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
513,399
154,469
223,350
114,332
119,984
170,433
202,745
99
35
60
97
42
54
26
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
449,282
148,767
165,357
112,203
410,734
153,112
264,645
469,747
166,902
200,365
125,034
205,554
286,202
344,164
123,142
183,861
192,449
122,270
751,155
387,641
448,345
134,908
75
57
66
70
89
78
89
90
80
66
75
75
85
87
65
73
89
63
47
65
74
80
69
70
ANNEX G (continued)
Year
Urban Population
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
148,752
251,567
364,476
341,971
106,926
246,856
71
79
77
80
77
70
2001
162,157
100
2001
106,916
90
2001
287,131
82
2001
2001
2001
2001
162,779
105,720
157,295
203,975
100
100
100
100
2001
2001
2001
539,130
137,390
1,303,182
75
95
90
1,836,286
283,273
704,168
396,125
895,989
144,345
1,405,933
283,273
344,593
147,800
80
100
68
88
80
90
87
100
80
100
7,765,000
77
6,784,000
86
2003
738,173
94
2007
2007
209,787
189,790
96
90
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
2001
Middle East & North Africa (UNSD 2009)
2007
2005
South Asia
NOTES:
* Domestic waste data used as MSW figures not available; hence it is assumed that waste collection coverage is for domestic waste and not MSW
** Urban population data from 2007; Waste collection coverage data from 2006
PAHO definitions:
Municipal waste
Solid or semi-solid waste generated in of population centers including domestic and commercial wastes, as well as those originated by the,
small-scale industries and institutions (including hospital and clinics); markets street sweeping, and from public cleansing.
Domestic waste
Domestic solid or semi-solid waste generated by human activities a the household level.
ANNEX
ANNEX H
City
Urban
Population
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
Open
Dump
(%)
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
12,544,018
285,000
202,518
245,677
472,971
100
80
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
717,026
629,955
790,353
201,230
135,783
1,113,000
193,876
135,783
87
0
87
89
85
85
83
90
0
74
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
5
0
0
9
0
0
N.A.
N.A.
0
0
9
0
0
13
11
13
7
15
6
9
10
318,779
138,402
245,347
214,344
268,792
161,953
216,061
250,348
163,036
160,148
145,475
175,938
140,559
120,874
120,299
203,231
148,312
365,674
468,390
120,874
148,220
200,792
185,268
275,982
286,931
0
0
98
100
35
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
83
0
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
86
0
100
0
100
75
0
0
48
0
100
75
100
100
0
96
0
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
95
0
99
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N.A.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
2
0
17
0
0
25
0
0
0
4
17
15
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
14
5
0
1
154,832
308,288
118,935
154,897
2,186,632
222,217
268,843
110,846
0
0
0
14
0
0
20
20
9
100
100
0
90
100
80
0
90
0
0
85
11
0
0
80
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
71
72
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
Open
Dump
(%)
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
133,177
162,078
109,220
220,345
452,307
144,381
0
20
0
93
100
81
100
80
88
0
0
0
0
0
13
5
0
19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
293,000
183,000
1,276,000
353,000
6,558,000
543,000
230,000
113,000
2,181,000
854,000
129,000
166,000
145,000
116,000
232,000
403,000
246,000
115,000
345,000
1,909,000
256,000
234,000
349,000
206,000
382,000
234,000
285,000
114,000
310,000
157,000
278,000
100
0
100
97
100
0
0
100
0
100
82
100
99
0
0
99
98
0
100
100
0
100
99
0
0
100
0
100
0
100
95
0
0
0
0
0
98
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
90
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98
86
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
18
0
1
0
10
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
14
0
0
0
0
0
5
234,737
138,940
203,770
123,375
109,398
129,219
109,367
108,214
135,133
326,384
100
100
90
100
100
0
0
0
0
98
0
0
0
0
0
30
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
97
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
70
0
0
3
2
210,580
594,424
2,774,926
0
0
83
0
0
10
100
100
0
0
0
3
0
0
4
ANNEX
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
Open
Dump
(%)
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
1,841,200
200,421
84
0
0
91
0
0
0
0
16
9
479,605
285,286
81
95
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
5
95,551
90
10
2,541,581
40
60
180,000
90
10
141,061
416,301
143,803
335,866
138,480
138,504
152,845
143,452
1,100,085
164,868
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
65
38
80
44
60
35
54
38
30
54
25
0
0
0
0
0
23
26
0
23
10
62
20
56
40
65
23
36
70
23
819,867
100
357,265
159,974
452,724
1,458,155
331,190
331,190
0
0
0
0
0
0
100
100
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
728,010
117,271
656,245
130,425
108,466
297,776
475,683
117,929
135,875
219,281
444,870
219,414
169,784
388,012
232,956
209,241
676,160
197,275
268,673
131,268
94
0
94
0
0
93
94
0
0
0
94
0
0
94
0
0
93
0
0
94
0
0
0
94
0
0
0
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
0
94
0
0
94
0
94
0
94
94
0
94
94
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
73
74
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
107,065
178,672
125,105
155,363
342,374
755,017
117,215
130,748
495,962
1,655,225
381,747
183,941
246,166
276,085
1,650,776
679,230
109,179
144,166
279,878
129,236
619,185
101,390
106,922
198,564
125,395
445,778
1,264,121
199,712
128,407
174,205
1,153,998
113,705
103,909
113,727
362,442
184,289
111,671
127,443
427,966
385,047
714,689
197,699
779,523
8,615,955
144,574
194,458
1,112,636
628,801
861,173
141,412
1,223,180
164,819
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
0
0
0
94
0
94
0
0
92
94
0
0
93
0
0
93
0
94
94
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
92
0
0
0
92
0
0
94
94
0
0
0
94
0
93
0
0
92
0
0
93
0
0
0
0
94
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
92
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
94
0
0
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
70
0
Open
Dump
(%)
94
94
94
0
94
0
94
94
0
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
0
94
0
94
94
0
92
0
0
92
94
0
0
94
94
0
0
94
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
94
0
94
0
94
23
0
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
6
6
7
8
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
8
8
6
6
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
8
6
6
7
6
6
6
7
6
ANNEX
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
317,877
259,343
357,857
119,405
249,838
130,398
152,318
1,372,446
191,424
657,447
438,696
104,620
228,239
587,730
143,235
135,731
100,805
134,895
184,679
678,645
147,912
123,072
138,393
497,078
127,254
231,809
134,539
185,063
298,063
276,743
100,889
101,049
233,807
121,076
307,550
1,262,520
128,339
722,279
480,844
687,969
350,648
533,457
124,461
126,257
443,782
268,208
330,885
130,553
147,086
463,812
266,612
531,511
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
96
0
0
94
94
94
94
93
94
94
0
94
0
94
0
0
0
0
94
94
0
0
94
93
93
93
94
0
0
94
0
0
0
0
94
94
92
94
0
0
0
94
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
94
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
0
Open
Dump
(%)
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
94
0
94
94
92
94
0
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
94
94
0
94
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
0
94
94
94
94
94
0
0
94
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
8
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
75
76
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
Open
Dump
(%)
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
404,788
124,722
161,425
1,018,447
139,514
0
0
0
92
0
0
0
0
0
0
94
94
94
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
6
6
6
8
6
124,107
952,068
115,369
108,861
0
0
0
0
0
49
0
0
58
0
71
61
0
0
0
0
42
51
29
39
149,918
708,438
174,059
124,656
293,745
0
80
0
0
95
0
0
0
0
0
63
N.D.
66
64
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
37
20
34
36
5
513,399
170,433
37
0
61
100
0
0
0
0
2
0
449,282
148,767
165,357
112,203
410,734
153,112
264,645
469,747
166,902
200,365
125,034
205,554
286,202
344,164
123,142
183,861
192,449
122,270
751,155
387,641
448,345
134,908
148,752
251,567
364,476
341,971
106,926
246,856
0
0
0
0
0
70
0
80
0
0
0
0
76
78
0
0
0
0
0
0
66
0
0
70
0
0
0
0
67
51
59
63
79
0
79
0
71
59
67
66
0
0
58
65
79
56
42
58
0
71
63
0
68
71
69
62
18
35
26
21
3
14
3
2
12
28
20
21
11
5
27
19
3
32
46
29
20
13
21
15
16
12
16
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
14
15
16
18
16
18
18
17
13
13
13
13
17
15
16
18
12
12
13
14
16
16
15
16
17
15
15
ANNEX
ANNEX H (continued)
Urban
Population
Sanitary
Landfill
(%)
Controlled
Landfill
(%)
Open
Dump
(%)
Watercourses
(%)
Other
(%)
162,157
70
18
13
106,916
80
20
287,131
100
162,779
105,720
157,295
203,975
0
0
0
0
100
100
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
539,130
137,390
1,303,182
0
100
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
142,227
742,145
0
0
0
100
100
0
0
0
0
0
77
78
ANNEX I
Year
Urban
Population
Organic
(%)
Total
Recyclables
(%)
Paper (%)
Plastic
(%)
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
28
13
12
Africa
Ghana (Asase 2009)
Kumasi
2008
1,610,867
64
65
4
Middle East & North Africa (Al-Yousfi)
2002
67
18
2002
55
14
13
13
2002
34
31
16
14
2002
59
13
12
2002
68
10
11
2002
57
11
11
14
28
38
48
25
45
21
35
26
25
38
32
42
34
48
29
30
37
35
53
37
21
23
24
21
38
27
25
42
27
41
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
1,89,998
12,75,135
35,20,085
2,28,280
9,75,393
9,66,862
4,75,439
43,01,326
14,37,354
6,48,032
8,08,515
43,43,645
9,30,882
35,770
4,26,674
1,03,06,452
1,99,258
10,55,938
1,95,985
29,354
1,19,78,450
8,09,895
38,43,585
2,21,492
14,74,968
35,022
9,32,484
23,22,575
3,69,959
11,04,713
59
46
41
54
35
65
50
52
52
50
57
41
50
30
51
54
47
42
34
47
62
54
54
60
49
52
58
46
52
43
South Asia
14
16
12
21
19
14
14
22
22
13
11
16
16
22
20
16
16
23
13
16
17
23
22
19
13
21
17
12
21
16
ANNEX
ANNEX I (continued)
Year
Kanpur
2005
Kavarati
2005
Kochi
2005
Kohima
2005
Kolkata
2005
Lucknow
2005
Ludhiana
2005
Madurai
2005
Meerut
2005
Nagpur
2005
Nasik
2005
Panjim
2005
Patna
2005
Pondicherry
2005
Port Blair
2005
Pune
2005
Raipur
2005
Rajkot
2005
Ranchi
2005
Shillong
2005
Silvassa
2005
Simla
2005
Srinagar
2005
Surat
2005
Tiruvananthapuram
2005
Vadodara
2005
Varanasi
2005
Vijaywada
2005
Visakhapatnam
2005
Nepal (calculated from Alam 2008)
Kathmandu
Urban
Population
Organic
(%)
Total
Recyclables
(%)
Paper (%)
Plastic
(%)
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
25,51,337
10,119
5,95,575
77,030
45,72,876
21,85,927
13,98,467
9,28,868
10,68,772
20,52,066
10,77,236
59,066
13,66,444
2,20,865
99,984
25,38,473
6,05,747
9,67,476
8,47,093
1,32,867
50,463
1,42,555
8,98,440
24,33,835
7,44,983
13,06,227
10,91,918
8,51,282
9.82,904
48
46
57
57
51
47
50
55
55
47
40
62
52
50
48
62
51
42
51
63
72
43
62
57
73
47
45
59
46
12
27
19
23
11
16
19
17
11
16
25
17
13
24
28
17
16
11
10
17
14
37
18
11
14
15
17
17
24
41
27
23
20
38
37
31
27
35
37
35
21
35
26
24
21
32
47
39
20
14
20
20
32
13
38
38
23
30
738,173
68
11
11
79
80
ANNEX J
Country
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Bahamas, The
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo, Dem. Rep.
Congo, Rep.
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt, Arab Rep.
El Salvador
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Fiji
Income
Level
LMI
LMI
LMI
HIC
UMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
LI
HIC
UMI
HIC
UMI
LI
LMI
LMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
LI
LI
LMI
HIC
LMI
LI
LI
UMI
LMI
LMI
LI
LI
LMI
UMI
LI
UMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
LMI
LMI
LMI
LMI
LI
HIC
LI
UMI
Region
ECA
MENA
AFR
LCR
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
LCR
MENA
SAR
LCR
ECA
OECD
LCR
AFR
SAR
LCR
AFR
LCR
EAP
ECA
AFR
AFR
AFR
OECD
AFR
AFR
AFR
LCR
EAP
LCR
AFR
AFR
AFR
LCR
AFR
ECA
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
MENA
LCR
AFR
ECA
AFR
EAP
0.77
1.21
0.48
5.50
1.22
0.68
2.23
2.40
3.25
1.10
0.43
4.75
0.78
1.33
2.87
0.54
1.46
0.33
1.03
1.03
0.87
1.28
0.51
0.55
0.77
2.33
0.50
0.50
0.50
1.08
1.02
0.95
2.23
0.50
0.53
1.36
0.48
0.29
0.81
2.07
1.10
2.34
1.24
1.18
1.13
1.37
1.13
0.50
1.47
0.30
2.10
1,088
23,288
4,329
137
41,096
1,342
36,164
13,288
822
630
16,384
438
5,479
13,690
356
1,699
329
1,863
890
149,096
247
6,959
1,288
384
6,082
49,616
137
795
1,288
14,493
520,548
27,918
359
9,425
1,096
3,260
4,356
740
6,822
1,230
8,326
10,959
63
6,658
8,603
40,822
3,945
438
1,367
3,781
712
Total
Population
3,488,000
42,882,000
27,324,000
101,000
46,115,000
2,908,000
24,393,000
8,622,000
397,000
972,000
206,024,000
303,000
8,668,000
10,742,000
389,000
14,460,000
819,000
12,368,000
2,265,000
228,833,000
526,000
6,551,000
23,729,000
15,040,000
25,136,000
37,912,000
750,000
5,831,000
17,504,000
19,266,000
1,445,782,000
55,563,000
1,217,000
107,481,000
5,362,000
5,549,000
26,233,000
4,274,000
11,231,000
1,018,000
9,910,000
5,578,000
69,000
12,172,000
16,074,000
98,513,000
8,525,000
7,684,000
1,252,000
124,996,000
905,000
2025
MSW GenUrban
eration Per
Population Capita (kg/
capita/day)
2,006,000
31,778,000
18,862,000
35,000
43,470,000
1,947,000
22,266,000
6,204,000
346,000
875,000
76,957,000
152,000
6,903,000
10,511,000
237,000
7,286,000
428,000
9,047,000
1,591,000
206,850,000
426,000
5,011,000
6,899,000
2,577,000
17,194,000
31,445,000
526,000
2,634,000
6,566,000
17,662,000
822,209,000
44,179,000
405,000
48,980,000
3,678,000
3,973,000
15,677,000
2,735,000
8,763,000
760,000
7,575,000
5,027,000
55,000
9,523,000
12,027,000
46,435,000
5,726,000
2,368,000
903,000
30,293,000
557,000
1.2
1.45
0.7
4.3
1.85
1.2
2.1
2.15
2.9
1.6
0.75
4
1.2
1.8
2.3
0.75
1.7
0.7
1.4
1.6
1.3
1.6
0.75
0.8
1
2.2
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.5
1.7
1.5
2.1
0.75
0.75
1.8
0.7
0.8
1.3
2.1
1.65
2.15
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.6
0.7
1.7
0.65
2.1
Total MSW
Generation
(tonnes/day)
2,407
46,078
13,203
151
80,420
2,336
46,759
13,339
1,003
1,400
57,718
608
8,284
18,920
545
5,465
728
6,333
2,227
330,960
554
8,018
5,174
2,062
17,194
69,179
368
1,844
4,596
26,493
1,397,755
66,269
851
36,735
2,759
7,151
10,974
2,188
11,392
1,596
12,499
10,808
88
14,285
18,041
83,583
9,162
1,658
1,535
19,690
1,170
ANNEX
81
ANNEX J (continued)
Country
Income
Level
Region
Total
Population
2025
MSW GenUrban
eration Per
Population Capita (kg/
capita/day)
Total MSW
Generation
(tonnes/day)
Finland
France
HIC
HIC
OECD
OECD
3,301,950
47,192,398
2.13
1.92
7,030
90,493
5,464,000
65,769,000
3,805,000
53,659,000
2.1
2
7,991
107,318
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong, China
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Rep.
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kenya
Korea, South
Kuwait
Lao PDR
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, China
Macedonia, FYR
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Mongolia
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
UMI
LI
LMI
HIC
LI
HIC
UMI
LMI
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LMI
LMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
LMI
LI
HIC
HIC
LI
UMI
UMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
LI
LI
UMI
LMI
LI
HIC
LI
UMI
UMI
LMI
LMI
LI
LI
LMI
LI
AFR
AFR
ECA
OECD
AFR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
EAP
OECD
OECD
SAR
EAP
MENA
OECD
MENA
OECD
LCR
OECD
MENA
AFR
OECD
MENA
EAP
ECA
MENA
AFR
ECA
OECD
EAP
ECA
AFR
AFR
EAP
SAR
AFR
MENA
AFR
AFR
LCR
EAP
MENA
AFR
EAP
AFR
SAR
1,144,675
822,588
2,316,296
60,530,216
11,680,134
6,755,967
31,324
5,237,139
215,946
3,227,249
2,832,769
6,977,700
6,717,604
280,148
321,623,271
117,456,698
46,219,250
2,589,698
5,179,120
39,938,760
1,353,969
84,330,180
3,850,403
6,615,510
38,895,504
2,683,301
1,916,209
1,549,569
3,244,163
461,534
2,256,263
390,776
466,162
1,341,972
4,653,890
2,288,114
14,429,641
70,816
3,900,064
384,809
1,197,094
519,206
79,833,562
1,370,974
15,753,989
7,706,816
12,847,522
708,907
3,464,234
0.45
0.53
1.69
2.11
0.09
2.00
2.71
2.00
5.33
1.00
1.45
1.99
1.92
1.56
0.34
0.52
0.16
3.58
2.12
2.23
0.18
1.71
1.04
0.30
1.24
5.72
0.70
1.03
1.18
0.50
1.10
2.31
1.47
1.06
0.80
0.50
1.52
2.48
0.65
1.78
0.50
2.30
1.24
0.66
1.46
0.14
0.44
0.50
0.12
521
438
3,904
127,816
1,000
13,499
85
10,466
1,151
3,233
4,110
13,890
12,904
438
109,589
61,644
7,197
9,260
10,959
89,096
247
144,466
4,000
2,000
48,397
15,342
1,342
1,600
3,836
230
2,474
904
685
1,425
3,734
1,151
21,918
175
2,534
685
603
1,195
99,014
904
23,014
1,052
5,616
356
427
1,698,000
2,534,000
3,945,000
80,341,000
31,993,000
11,236,000
108,000
19,926,000
683,000
12,305,000
9,682,000
8,305,000
9,448,000
337,000
1,447,499,000
271,227,000
88,027,000
5,275,000
8,722,000
58,079,000
2,908,000
121,614,000
8,029,000
57,176,000
49,019,000
3,988,000
7,713,000
2,072,000
4,784,000
2,211,000
3,102,000
569,000
535,000
2,001,000
29,954,000
21,353,000
33,769,000
411,000
20,589,000
431,000
4,548,000
1,406,000
124,695,000
3,112,000
37,865,000
28,954,000
55,374,000
2,560,000
38,855,000
1,524,000
1,726,000
2,272,000
61,772,000
19,713,000
7,527,000
40,000
11,478,000
230,000
7,966,000
5,544,000
8,305,000
7,011,000
314,000
538,055,000
178,731,000
66,930,000
3,564,000
8,077,000
42,205,000
1,733,000
86,460,000
6,486,000
16,952,000
41,783,000
3,934,000
3,776,000
1,476,000
4,275,000
850,000
2,193,000
473,000
535,000
1,493,000
11,350,000
6,158,000
27,187,000
233,000
8,987,000
416,000
2,203,000
674,000
102,258
1,965,000
23,994,000
14,493,000
24,720,000
1,226,000
10,550,000
0.7
0.75
1.85
2.05
0.5
2
2.3
2
3.5
1.4
1.8
2
2
1.7
0.7
0.85
0.6
3
2.1
2.05
0.9
1.7
1.3
0.6
1.4
4
1.1
1.45
1.7
0.8
1.5
2.2
1.75
1.6
1.1
0.8
1.9
2.2
0.95
2
0.8
2.2
1.75
0.95
1.85
0.5
0.85
0.9
0.7
1,067
1,295
4,203
126,633
9,857
15,054
92
22,956
805
11,152
9,979
16,610
14,022
534
376,639
151,921
40,158
10,692
16,962
86,520
1,560
146,982
8,432
10,171
58,496
15,736
4,154
2,140
7,268
680
3,290
1,041
936
2,389
12,485
4,926
51,655
513
8,538
832
1,762
1,483
179
1,867
44,389
7,247
21,012
1,103
7,385
82
ANNEX J (continued)
Country
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and the
Grenadines
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Income
Level
Region
Total
Population
2025
MSW GenUrban
eration Per
Population Capita (kg/
capita/day)
Total MSW
Generation
(tonnes/day)
HIC
HIC
LMI
LI
LI
HIC
HIC
LI
UMI
LMI
LMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
UMI
UMI
LI
LI
HIC
LI
UMI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LI
UMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
UMI
UMI
OECD
OECD
LCR
AFR
AFR
OECD
MENA
SAR
LCR
LCR
LCR
EAP
ECA
OECD
MENA
ECA
ECA
AFR
AFR
MENA
AFR
ECA
AFR
AFR
EAP
OECD
ECA
EAP
AFR
OECD
SAR
LCR
LCR
LCR
13,197,842
3,612,147
2,848,165
2,162,063
73,178,110
3,605,500
1,629,404
60,038,941
2,008,299
3,052,320
18,678,510
58,654,205
23,398,400
6,162,205
759,577
11,648,240
107,386,402
1,573,625
88,673
15,388,239
4,693,019
3,830,299
43,172
2,029,398
4,839,400
3,036,442
986,862
50,992
26,720,493
33,899,073
2,953,410
15,069
44,119
48,255
2.12
3.68
1.10
0.49
0.56
2.80
0.70
0.84
1.21
0.21
1.00
0.50
0.88
2.21
1.33
1.04
0.93
0.52
0.49
1.30
0.52
0.79
2.98
0.45
1.49
1.37
1.21
4.30
2.00
2.13
5.10
5.45
4.35
1.70
27,945
13,293
3,123
1,068
40,959
10,082
1,142
50,438
2,438
630
18,740
29,315
20,630
13,616
1,014
12,082
100,027
822
44
20,000
2,438
3,041
129
904
7,205
4,164
1,192
219
53,425
72,137
15,068
82
192
82
16,960,000
4,764,000
7,075,000
26,250,000
210,129,000
5,228,000
3,614,000
224,956,000
4,267,000
8,026,000
34,148,000
115,878,000
36,337,000
10,712,000
1,102,000
19,494,000
128,193,000
15,220,000
216,000
34,797,000
17,999,000
9,959,000
94,000
8,639,000
5,104,000
5,308,000
1,941,000
705,000
52,300,000
46,623,000
20,328,000
61,000
195,000
125,000
14,860,000
4,229,000
4,478,000
5,503,000
126,634,000
4,187,000
2,700,000
104,042,000
3,501,000
5,584,000
25,593,000
86,418,000
23,236,000
7,389,000
1,066,000
11,783,000
96,061,000
3,831,000
155,000
29,661,000
8,992,000
5,814,000
60,000
3,949,000
5,104,000
3,300,000
958,000
183,000
36,073,000
37,584,000
3,830,000
23,000
64,000
69,000
2.1
3
1.5
0.75
0.8
2.3
1.15
1.05
1.65
0.6
1.4
0.9
1.2
2.15
1.7
1.45
1.25
0.85
0.9
1.7
0.85
1.05
2.5
0.85
1.8
1.6
1.7
4
2
2.1
4
4
4
1.85
31,206
12,687
6,717
4,127
101,307
9,630
3,105
109,244
5,777
3,350
35,830
77,776
27,883
15,886
1,812
17,085
120,076
3,256
140
50,424
7,643
6,105
150
3,357
9,187
5,280
1,629
732
72,146
78,926
15,320
92
256
128
LMI
UMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
LI
LI
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
LMI
AFR
LCR
AFR
OECD
OECD
MENA
ECA
AFR
EAP
AFR
EAP
LCR
MENA
ECA
ECA
12,600,333
343,331
270,983
7,662,130
5,490,214
9,109,737
1,653,091
9,439,781
22,453,143
2,390,840
22,162
144,645
6,063,259
48,846,780
2,061,980
0.79
1.36
0.51
1.61
2.61
1.37
0.89
0.26
1.76
0.52
3.71
14.40
0.81
1.77
0.98
10,000
466
137
12,329
14,329
12,493
1,479
2,425
39,452
1,233
82
2,082
4,932
86,301
2,027
54,267,000
482,000
1,242,000
9,854,000
7,978,000
27,519,000
8,929,000
59,989,000
68,803,000
9,925,000
112,000
1,401,000
12,170,000
89,557,000
6,068,000
30,921,000
389,000
417,000
8,525,000
6,096,000
16,890,000
2,774,000
21,029,000
29,063,000
5,352,000
37,000
291000
8,909,000
67,981,000
3,485,000
1.05
1.6
0.85
1.85
2.3
1.7
1.2
0.55
1.95
0.85
3.5
10
1.15
2
1.25
32,467
622
354
15,771
14,021
28,713
3,329
11,566
56,673
4,549
130
2,910
10,245
135,962
4,356
ANNEX
83
ANNEX J (continued)
Country
Uganda
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Vanuatu
Venezuela, RB
Vietnam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Income
Level
LI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
LMI
UMI
LI
LI
LI
Region
AFR
MENA
OECD
OECD
LCR
EAP
LCR
EAP
AFR
AFR
0.34
1.66
1.79
2.58
0.11
3.28
1.14
1.46
0.21
0.53
1,179
4,192
97,342
624,700
329
110
25,507
35,068
842
2,356
2025
MSW GenUrban
eration Per
Population Capita (kg/
capita/day)
Total
Population
54,011,000
6,268,000
65,190,000
354,930,000
3,548,000
328,000
35,373,000
106,357,000
16,539,000
15,969,000
9,713,000
5,092,000
59,738,000
305,091,000
3,333,000
113,000
34,059,000
40,505,000
6,862,000
7,539,000
0.65
2
1.85
2.3
0.6
3
1.5
1.8
0.55
0.7
Total MSW
Generation
(tonnes/day)
6,313
10,184
110,515
701,709
2,000
339
51,089
72,909
3,774
5,277
Income Level
Number
of
Countries
Included
Total Urban
Population
(millions)
Per Capita
(kg/capita/day)
Projected Population
Total
(tonnes/day)
Total Population
(millions)
Urban Population
(millions)
Per Capita
(kg/capita/day)
Total
(tonnes/day)
Lower Income
38
343
0.60
204,802
1,637
676
0.86
584,272
42
1,293
0.78
1,012,321
4,011
2,080
1.26
2,618,804
35
572
1.16
665,586
888
619
1.59
987,039
High Income
46
774
2.13
1,649,546
1,112
912
2.06
1,879,590
Total
161
2,982
1.19
3,532,255
7,648
4,287
1.42
6,069,705
Summary by Region
Current Available Data
Region
Number of
Countries Total Urban
Included Population
(millions)
Total
(tonnes/day)
Projected Population
Total (millions)
Urban (millions)
Total (tonnes/
day)
AFR
42
261
0.65
169,120
1,153
518
0.85
441,840
EAP
17
777
0.95
738,959
2,124
1,230
1.52
1,865,380
ECA
19
227
1.12
254,389
339
240
1.48
354,811
LCR
33
400
1.09
437,545
682
466
1.56
728,392
MENA
16
162
1.07
173,545
379
257
1.43
369,320
OECD
27
729
2.15
1,566,286
1,032
842
2.07
1,742,417
SAR
426
0.45
192,411
1,939
734
0.77
567,545
Total
161
2,982
1.19
3,532,255
7,648
4,287
1.42
6,069,705
84
ANNEX K
Income
Region
Collection (%)
Urban/Total
LMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
LMI
LI
UMI
UMI
LI
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
HIC
UMI
UMI
LMI
LMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LMI
HIC
LI
HIC
UMI
LMI
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
LMI
HIC
UMI
UMI
HIC
ECA
MENA
OECD
LCR
ECA
OECD
ECA
OECD
LCR
AFR
LCR
ECA
EAP
OECD
LCR
AFR
LCR
ECA
LCR
OECD
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
MENA
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
ECA
OECD
AFR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
EAP
OECD
OECD
EAP
MENA
OECD
OECD
LCR
OECD
MENA
OECD
ECA
MENA
OECD
77
92
100
95
80
100
100
100
50
23
83
81
75
99
98
20
74
92
76
100
100
94
69
81
30-95
71
79
100
100
60
100
85
100
100
72
89
11
68
100
90
100
80
56
76
100
62
100
95+
99
50
100
100
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
U
T
ANNEX
ANNEX K (continued)
Income
Region
Collection (%)
Urban/Total
HIC
LI
LI
HIC
LMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
LMI
LI
HIC
LMI
HIC
UMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
UMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
LI
HIC
LMI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
UMI
UMI
LMI
LI
EAP
AFR
AFR
MENA
EAP
AFR
LCR
OECD
MENA
SAR
OECD
LCR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
OECD
ECA
AFR
ECA
AFR
AFR
EAP
OECD
ECA
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
OECD
OECD
MENA
AFR
LCR
MENA
ECA
AFR
OECD
OECD
LCR
LCR
MENA
AFR
100
18
40
100
60
98
91
100
72-100
94
100
73
99
77
51
74
100
90
21
65
95
33-55
100
100
93
98
100
91
80
100
99
80
48
100
95
77
39
100
100
86
86
85
20
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
U
U
T
U
T
U
T
T
T
T
U
T
85
86
ANNEX K (continued)
Number
of Countries
Included
Upper Limit
Lower Income
13
10.62
55.00
20
50.20
95+
27
50.00
100.00
High Income
35
76.00
100.00
Total
95
Summary by Region
Number
of Countries
Included
Lower Limit
Upper Limit
AFR
12
17.70
55.00
EAP
60.00
100.00
ECA
12
50.00
100.00
LCR
28
10.62
100.00
MENA
10
55.60
95+
OECD
26
76.00
100.00
SAR
Total
95
Region
94.00
ANNEX
ANNEX L
Income
Region
Algeria
Antigua and
Barbuda
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominica
Greece
Grenada
Guatemala
Guyana
Haiti
Hong Kong, China
Hungary
Iceland2
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan3
Korea, South
Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao, China2
Madagascar2
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco4
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
UMI
MNA
HIC
LCR
LMI
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
LI
LMI
HIC
UMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
UMI
LMI
LMI
LI
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
LMI
HIC
LI
UMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LI
HIC
LMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
LMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
ECA
OECD
OECD
ECA
OECD
LCR
ECA
EAP
AFR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
ECA
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
LCR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
LCR
EAP
OECD
OECD
OECD
MENA
OECD
LCR
OECD
MENA
OECD
ECA
ECA
MENA
ECA
OECD
EAP
AFR
MENA
EAP
AFR
LCR
OECD
MENA
OECD
OECD
LCR
Dumps (%)
96.80
Landfills
(%)
0.20
Compost
(%)
1.00
99.00
100.00
95.00
54.00
22.37
37
24
60
37
95
34
100.00
69.66
6.75
96.00
11.57
100.00
82.90
100.00
46.00
71.95
69.50
100.00
87.20
79.78
5.09
100.00
92
90
22
59
55
90
72
66
90
54
100
3
85
36
100
40
46
44
19
21
97
88
91
97
27
1
2
85
28
44.72
4.00
22.77
12.48
0.90
11.10
3.24
15.28
1
9
33
19
23
Recycled
(%)
WTE (%)
Other (%)
2.00
1.00
30.34
26.54
31.10
5.00
26.78
0.29
2.40
4.80
1.27
25.57
45
3
16
34
10
17
49
8
4
23
31
2
3
4
4
25
15
21.10
34.32
13.97
54.04
6
9
12
74
14
2
39
32
0.90
17.10
60.74
5.39
27.20
12.80
1.74
0.03
10
78
4
76
6
15
1
50
100
13
63
132
17
38
87
88
ANNEX L (continued)
Landfills
(%)
Compost
(%)
Recycled
(%)
Country
Income
Region
WTE (%)
Other (%)
Niger
Norway
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Poland
Portugal5
Romania
Singapore6
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
St. Kitts and
Nevis
St. Lucia
St. Vincent and
the Grenadines
Suriname
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab
Republic
Thailand
Trinidad and
Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Venezuela, RB
West Bank and
Gaza
LI
HIC
UMI
LMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
AFR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
ECA
OECD
ECA
EAP
OECD
ECA
OECD
LCR
20
42
19
64
26
56
44
66
92
64
75
15
78
86
52
100
15
3
6
33
4
34
4
9
47
1
25
0
21
12
32
0
24
14
15
25
49
7
14
UMI
UMI
LCR
LCR
70
78
30
22
UMI
HIC
HIC
LCR
OECD
OECD
100
5
1
10
16
34
34
50
50
0
1
LMI
MENA
>60
<25
<5
<15
LMI
HIC
EAP
LCR
14
85
94
LMI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
UMI
UMI
LMI
MENA
ECA
AFR
OECD
OECD
LCR
LCR
MENA
45
66
32
59
69
50
30
100
64
54
3
30
0
1
9
8
17
24
8
14
66
41
NOTES:
For sources and year of data, see Annex C.
1. All waste is taken to landfills, where the waste is classfied and then sent to different destinations, such as recycling and composting plants.
2. Percentages may not add up to 100 because residues of some treatments, such as incineration and composting, are landfilled.
3. Landfilling refers to all waste disposed on land.
4. Recycled amount refers to both recycled and composted waste; other includes wastes imported from France for incineration with energy recovery.
5. Landfill includes non-controlled dumping sites.
6. MSW includes industrial waste from manufacturing industries; landfill includes ash from incineration.
ANNEX
ANNEX L (continued)
Lower Income
Lower Middle Income
Upper Middle Income
High Income
Total
7
17
27
39
90
Summary by Region
Region
AFR
EAP
ECA
LCR
MENA
OECD
SAR
Total
89
90
ANNEX M
Income
Level
Region
LMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
LI
UMI
HIC
LMI
LI
LMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
LI
LMI
HIC
UMI
UMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
LMI
LI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LI
LMI
HIC
LI
HIC
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
LMI
LMI
LMI
HIC
HIC
HIC
UMI
HIC
ECA
MENA
OECD
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
SAR
ECA
OECD
LCR
AFR
SAR
LCR
LCR
EAP
EAP
AFR
OECD
LCR
LCR
LCR
ECA
LCR
ECA
OECD
OECD
LCR
MENA
AFR
EAP
OECD
OECD
AFR
ECA
OECD
AFR
OECD
LCR
AFR
LCR
EAP
OECD
OECD
SAR
EAP
MENA
OECD
MENA
OECD
LCR
OECD
Organic (%)
38
70
19
40
51
47
35
71
29
39
60
52
58
24
61
44
55
48
24
50
54
50
46
69
38
18
29
39
60
88
68
33
32
35
39
14
64
47
44
58
49
38
29
26
35
62
43
25
40
29
57
26
Paper (%)
10
10
26
24
12
23
22
5
28
17
20
3
17
6
15
22
3
4
47
19
11
21
20
12
27
8
27
14
10
4
15
40
20
10
34
34
3
20
18
9
24
26
15
26
3
6
22
31
25
28
13
46
Plastic (%)
8
5
14
14
10
4
11
7
10
5
5
7
13
8
15
2
10
5
3
10
10
18
12
10
11
4
1
36
12
2
8
10
9
3
22
4
9
13
4
10
19
17
17
2
10
11
11
13
5
18
9
Glass (%)
5
1
11
5
9
7
8
13
7
5
2
4
2
3
4
8
4
6
2
5
2
7
5
1
4
5
1
3
1
3
5
10
2
3
12
5
5
1
2
3
2
4
1
9
2
5
3
13
5
7
Metal (%)
5
2
3
2
5
5
5
7
3
5
2
1
1
2
5
7
5
13
2
2
2
4
2
9
2
6
1
2
1
3
5
3
2
5
5
1
5
4
1
2
2
2
3
8
9
4
3
2
4
8
Other (%)
34
12
27
15
14
13
19
16
13
29
5
1
7
59
5
13
17
35
8
4
18
7
11
3
13
63
32
10
13
4
4
7
26
51
16
12
28
16
16
27
12
12
35
24
59
4
13
23
16
22
3
12
ANNEX
ANNEX M (continued)
Income
Level
Region
LMI
HIC
LI
UMI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
LI
LMI
UMI
UMI
LMI
LI
LI
LI
HIC
HIC
LI
LMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
UMI
LMI
UMI
HIC
UMI
LI
UMI
LI
HIC
HIC
LMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
HIC
HIC
LMI
LMI
LI
LMI
HIC
LMI
UMI
LI
HIC
UMI
MENA
OECD
EAP
ECA
MENA
AFR
OECD
EAP
ECA
AFR
EAP
AFR
EAP
AFR
LCR
MENA
AFR
EAP
SAR
OECD
OECD
AFR
AFR
OECD
SAR
LCR
LCR
EAP
ECA
OECD
ECA
AFR
ECA
AFR
EAP
OECD
EAP
OECD
SAR
LCR
OECD
OECD
MENA
EAP
AFR
EAP
LCR
MENA
ECA
AFR
OECD
LCR
Organic (%)
62
28
46
57
63
43
45
4
20
52
62
18
20
70
51
69
69
54
80
35
56
38
57
30
67
44
55
41
38
34
46
44
5
85
44
38
65
49
76
34
29
65
48
46
47
14
68
40-65
78
25
54
Paper (%)
11
24
6
18
10
22
4
24
4
7
4
15
12
15
19
12
8
7
26
21
2
11
33
5
25
7
19
10
21
11
10
37
28
13
6
21
11
32
68
20
10
15
4
31
32
9
7-18
3
34
20
Plastic (%)
16
8
10
7
13
1
24
11
1
12
2
15
9
6
4
10
16
3
19
8
2
18
9
18
11
4
14
10
11
3
3
12
12
7
17
12
6
12
2
15
12
14
10
5
24
11
5-14
1
12
11
Glass (%)
2
5
8
5
1
12
4
5
1
3
1
5
2
6
4
3
7
3
4
3
5
4
2
8
3
3
12
7
11
1
10
4
8
5
8
1
8
11
4
4
5
2
3
3
2
2-6
1
5
3
Metal (%)
2
7
12
3
2
4
1
3
1
6
4
20
3
3
3
2
8
1
4
7
1
5
4
5
2
5
8
4
5
3
5
5
3
6
4
1
6
2
3
2
4
2
8
16
4
1-6
2
8
5
Other (%)
6
28
21
43
4
31
16
63
37
41
10
1
22
4
18
2
4
7
7
12
5
57
4
20
7
7
28
18
23
23
24
39
31
15
7
31
2
7
5
8
17
29
7
14
35
5
12
6
7-24
16
16
8
91
92
ANNEX M (continued)
Income
Level
Region
LMI
LI
LMI
LI
LI
EAP
EAP
MENA
AFR
AFR
Organic (%)
Paper (%)
71
60
61
50
40
Plastic (%)
11
2
14
5
21
Glass (%)
8
16
7
5
20
Metal (%)
3
7
3
2
4
Other (%)
4
6
2
2
4
3
9
13
37
11
NOTE:
For sources and year of data, see Annex C.
Organic (%)
Paper (%)
Plastic (%)
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
Number of
Countries
Included
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
22
27
18
20
88
76
2
3
21
34
1
2
20
18
1
1
8
9
1
1
12
20
1
2
57
59
25
70
37
36
13
43
35
109
56
68
24
13
16
63
Summary by Region
Region
AFR
EAP
ECA
LCR
MENA
OECD
SAR
Total
Number of
Countries
Included
19
17
12
18
10
6
27
109
Organic (%)
Paper (%)
Plastic (%)
Glass (%)
Metal (%)
Other (%)
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
Lower
Limit
Upper
Limit
18
4
5
14
40
14
35
88
71
65
69
70
56
80
2
2
10
6
9
8
3
21
31
37
32
25
68
17
1
2
3
4
4
1
2
20
24
12
36
16
22
18
1
3
1
1
1
2
1
5
9
13
8
5
13
4
1
1
3
1
2
2
1
5
20
9
16
9
13
1
1
2
11
3
2
5
5
57
63
43
59
16
63
59
ANNEX
ANNEX N
Food
Waste
Paper/
Cardboard
Wood
Eastern Asia
South-Central Asia
South-Eastern Asia
Western Asia & Middle
East
26.2
40.3
43.5
41.1
18.8
11.3
12.9
18
3.5
7.9
9.9
9.8
Eastern Africa
Middle Africa
Northern Africa
Southern Africa
Western Africa
53.9
43.4
51.1
23
40.4
7.7
16.8
16.5
25
9.8
7
6.5
2
15
4.4
Eastern Europe
Northern Europe
Southern Europe
Western Europe
30.1
23.8
36.9
24.2
21.8
30.6
17
27.5
7.5
10
10.6
11
36
67.5
30
6
24
2.5
North America
Central America
South America
Caribbean
33.9
43.8
44.9
46.9
23.2
13.7
17.1
17
6.2
13.5
4.7
2.4
Textiles
Asia
3.5
2.5
2.7
2.9
Africa
1.7
2.5
2.5
1
Europe
4.7
2
Rubber/
Leather
Plastic
Metal
Glass
Other
1
0.8
0.9
0.6
14.3
6.4
7.2
6.3
2.7
3.8
3.3
1.3
3.1
3.5
4
2.2
7.4
21.9
16.3
5.4
1.1
5.5
4.5
4.5
1.8
3.5
3.5
2.3
2
2
11.6
1.5
1.5
1.4
6.2
13
3.6
7
10
8
14.6
1.4
1.8
0.7
1.9
8.5
6.7
10.8
9.9
4.6
2.6
2.9
5
6.5
3.7
3.3
5.7
9.8
12.3
13
3.5
Oceania
America
3.9
2.6
2.6
5.1
NOTES:
1. Data are based on weight of wet waste of MSW without industrial waste at generation around year 2000.
2. The region-specific values are calculated from national, partly incomplete composition data. The percentages given may therefore not
add up to 100%. Some regions may not have data for some waste types - blanks in the table represent missing data.
93
94
ANNEX O
REFERENCES
References
Achankeng, Eric. 2003. Globalization, Urbanization and
Municipal Solid Waste Management in Africa. African
Studies Association of Australasia and the Pacific
2003 Conference.
Alam, R., M. Chowdhury, G. Hasan, B. Karanjit, L.
Shrestha. 2008. Generation, storage, collection and
transportation of municipal solid waste A case
study in the city of Kathmandu, capital of Nepal.
Waste Management 28:1088-1097.
Al-Yousfi, B. Sound Environmental Management of
Solid Waste The Landfill Bioreactor. UNEP.
Asase, M., E. Yanful, M. Mensah, J. Stanford, S. Amponsah. 2009. Comparison of municipal solid waste
management systems in Canada and Ghana: A case
study of the cities of London, Ontario, and Kumasi,
Ghana. Waste Management 29:2779-2786.
Asomani-Boateng, R. and M. Haight. Reusing organic
solid waste in urban farming in African cities: a challenge for urban planners. In Urban Agriculture in
West Africa Contributing to Food Security and Urban Sanitation. 1999. O. Smith (Ed.). IDRC.
Atudorei, A. Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management
in Romania. Case Study Region 8 Bucharest Ilfov.
European Federation of Waste Management and Environmental Services.
Bangladesh Department of Environment. 2004. SAARC Workshop on Solid Waste Management, Dhaka,
Bangladesh, October 10 - 12, 2004. Prepared by Bangladesh DoE, Waste Concern, and ITN-BUET.
Batool, S. and M. Nawaz. 2009. Municipal solid waste
management in Lahore City District, Pakistan.
Waste Management 29:1971-1981.
Belarus Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. 2006. Second, Third, Fourth National
Communication.
Bingh, L. 2004. Opportunities for utilizing waste biomass for
energy in Uganda. University of Science and Technology,
Oslo, Norway.
Business News Americas. 2004. Solid waste generation up
7.88% in 2003 Bolivia. Available at: http://www.bnamericas.com/content_print.jsp?id=283762&idioma=I
§or=&type=NEWS (accessed October 2009).
95
96
Hoornweg, D., P. Lam, M. Chaudhry. 2005. Waste Management in China: Issues and Recommendations. Urban
Development Working Papers No. 9. East Asia Infrastructure Department. World Bank.
Kgathi, D. and B. Bolaane. 2001. Instruments for sustainable solid waste management in Botswana. Waste
Management & Research 19:342-353.
Kum, V., A. Sharp, and N. Harnpornchai. 2005. Improving the solid waste management in Phnom Penh city:
A strategic approach. Waste Management 25:101-109.
Latvia Ministry of Environment. 2006. Fourth National
Communication of the Republic of Latvia to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Lithuania Ministry of Environment. 2005. Lithuanias
Third and Fourth National Communication on Climate
Change.
Imam, A., B. Mohammed, D.C. Wilson, and C.R. Cheeseman. 2008. Solid waste management in Abuja, Nigeria. Waste Management 28:468-472.
IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Chapter
10 Waste management. J. Bogner, Coordinating
Lead Author. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R.
Dave, L.A. Meyer (eds). Cambridge University Press.
METAP. 2004. Mediterranean Environmental Technical Assistance Programme Solid Waste Management
Centre. Available at http://www.metap-solidwaste.
org/ (accessed October 2- 009).
REFERENCES
Pasang, H., G. Moore, and G. Sitorus. 2007. Neighbourhood-based waste management: A solution for
solid waste problems in Jakarta, Indonesia. Waste
Management 27:1924-1938.
Patriotic Vanguard. 2007. World Bank Report: Solid Waste Management in Freetown. The Patriotic
Vanguard Newspaper. Available at http://www.thepatrioticvanguard.com/article.php3?id_article=955#
(accessed October 2009).
Payet, R. 2003. Solid Waste Management in Indian Ocean Islands and Seychelles. Waste Management Experts Meeting, Havana, Cuba. October 27 November 1, 2003.
Perera, K. 2003. An Overview of the Issue of Solid
Waste Management in Sri Lanka. In Proceedings of the
Third International Conference on Environment and Health.
M. Bunch, V. Suresh and T. Kumaran (Eds.), Chennai, India, December 15 -17, 2003.
Peterson, C. 1979, Excise Tax on New Tires Proposed:
Scrap Tires Arise As Special Disposal Problem.
Waste Age. May 1979.
Phuntsho, S., S. Heart, and D. Yangden. 2008. Results
of the first national solid waste survey in the urban areas of
Bhutan. National Conference on Solid Waste Management, Thimphu, Bhutan. August 18-20-2008.
Saeed, M., M. Hassan, M. Mujeebu. 2009. Assessment
of municipal solid waste generation and recyclable
materials potential in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Waste Management 29:2209-2213.
Samake, M., Z. Tang, W. Hlaing, and J. Wang. 2009.
State and Management of Solid Wastes in Mali:
Case Study of Bamako. Environmental Research Journal
3(3):81-86.
Shekdar, A. 2009. Sustainable solid waste management: An integrated approach for Asian countries.
Waste Management 29:1438-1448.
Singapore. 2009. Yearbook of Statistics Singapore. Government of Singapore.
Slovenia Ministry of the Environment and Spatial
Planning. 2006. Slovenias Fourth National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Solomon, U. 2009. The state of solid waste management in Nigeria. Waste Management 29:2787-2790.
97
98
USAID. 2009. Environmental Guidelines for SmallScale Activities in Africa. 2nd Ed. ENCAP (Environmentally Sound Design and Management Capacity
Building for Partners and Programs in Africa). Available at: http://www.encapafrica.org/egssaa.htm (accessed November 2009).
van de Klundert, A. and J. Anschtz. 2001. Integrated
Sustainable Waste Management- the Concept. Tools
for Decision-makers. Experiences from the Urban
Waste Expertise Programme (1995-2001). WASTE.
Vego, G., S. Kuar-Dragievi, N. Koprivanac. 2008.Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia,
Croatia. Waste Management 28:2192-2201.
WASTE. 2005. Available at http://www.waste.nl (accessed May 2010).
World Bank. 2004. Vietnam Environment Monitor
2004 Solid Waste. Jointly prepared by World Bank,
Vietnam Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, and CIDA.
KNOWLEDGE PAPERS
WHAT A WASTE
Email: urbanhelp@worldbank.org
Website: www.worldbank.org/urban