Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2d 901
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-90634-CRT)
Shirley Hemphill, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
without giving a receipt. The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 1915(d) concluding that it was frivolous. Hemphill, without
appealing the first dismissal, filed this action raising essentially the same claim.
The district court dismissed the second complaint, again as frivolous, with
reference to its holding in the first case. Hemphill now appeals the dismissal of
her second complaint. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the decision of
the district court.
2
The test for determining whether a complaint is frivolous within the meaning of
28 U.S.C. 1915(d) is whether "it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in
fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989). The facts alleged by
Hemphill--a warrantless entry into her house and the confiscation of her
property--could, if proved, state a valid fourth amendment claim. Thus, the
claim does not lack an arguable basis in law or in fact. The absence of proof
does not militate in favor of dismissal with prejudice before allowing the pro se
plaintiff an opportunity to supplement her complaint. Id.
Although the district court erred when it dismissed the claim as frivolous, we
affirm the dismissal based on the principle of res judicata. The plaintiff, having
previously filed the same cause of action against the same defendant with an
adjudication on the merits, is barred from relitigating the claim. See Brooks v.
The Arlington Hosp. Assoc., 850 F.2d 191, 195 (4th Cir.1988).
Since Hemphill was barred from bringing her second claim, this appeal is
without merit. The decision of the district court is affirmed. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED.