Issuance of TRO not allowed in cases involving implementation of government

refrastructure.
AVAILABLE DEFENSES OF B.P. 22 CASES
a. Payment of the value of dishonoured check within five (5) banking days from
receipt of notice of dishonour.
b. Payment of the value of the check before the filing of the criminal case in court.
*it was redeemed by the accused
c. Failure to serve a written notice of dishonour of the check to the issuer.
*not a mode of extinguishing criminal liability
d. Novation or change in the underlying obligation of the parties before the filing of
the criminal case in court (GR No. 193362 Medalla vs. Laxa)
e. Stop payment order pursuant to a valid reason such as non-delivery of goods or
services
f. Knowledge by the payee that the check was not supported by sufficient funds
when the issuer issued the check (Tan vs. Phil. Commercial International Bank)

Right in esse clear and unmistakable right to be protected one clearly founded on or
granted by law or is enforceable as a matter of law.