Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Natural geography, including hydrology, forms a remarkably uniform system in the southern section of the Great
Hungarian Plain bordered by the Tisza, Maros and Krs
Rivers (Pcsi & Srfalvi 1960, 105). In spite of its relative
homogeneity, however, this landscape is very diverse as the
area largely occupied by Csongrd and Bks counties is
sub-divided by major rivers (the Tisza and its tributaries) as
well as a web of small water courses. Rich water supplies1 in
combination with the diversity of local habitats offered good
opportunities for the settlement of early neolithic human populations. The first ever communities practicing sedentary agriculture in the area of present-day Hungary were represented
by the Starevo culture in Southern Transdanubia in the west
and the Krs culture that occupied a significant portion of
the Great Hungarian Plain beginning with the end of the 7th
millennium BC. The latter inhabited the valley of the Tisza
River and of its left bank tributaries for almost a millennium
(Paluch & Tth 2005, 1415).
Catchment areas of the Tisza, Krs, Maros and Berety Rivers seem to have defined the first strategic boundaries of early neolithic sedentism. Within the region outlined by these rivers a previously unseen density of settlements began appearing. Considering Csongrd county
alone, field surveys covering an area of over 4000 km2 as
well as archival and literary data have revealed the existence
of 232 early neolithic sites. Numbers have recently increased spectacularly thanks to field walks carried out
within the framework of the national archaeological survey
in Csongrd county.2 Previously, such a dazzling number of
sites would have been unimaginable, not only within a single county but over the entire area of Hungary (Makkay
1982, 113). A similarly high density of early neolithic settlements may be observed in the adjacent area of Bks
county (MRT 8; MRT 10).
Plotting these early neolithic settlements over the map,
1
2
Prior to extensive river regulation projects the open floodplain area of the Tisza River exceeded 1,940,000 hectares of which only 158,000 hectares
remain today (Bulla & Mendl 1999, 149).
These local surveys were carried out mostly in cooperation between the Department of Archaeology of Szeged University and archaeologists of the
Ferenc Mra Museum within the framework of the project titled Archaeological Topographic Works in Csongrd County. To date, most of the
results have remained unpublished.
49
1. Soil quality had no demonstrable effect on decision-making during the time of early neolithic settlement,
2. Early neolithic lifeways may have somewhat differed
depending on settlement in areas characterized by the two
different soil types.
Agriculture may have been practiced on pleistocene residual surfaces, while fishing, hunting and gathering may
have been subsistence practices pursued in floodplain areas.
Other resources of the floodplain must have included wood
and water itself as a means of transport and communication.
Early neolithic settlements are aligned along river
banks, especially those of the Tisza. Of the aforementioned
232 Krs culture settlements known in Csongrd County
16 are represented only in the form of archival records or literary references. Studies of settlement structure can be carried out concerning the remaining 216 sites. During the
course of field walks carried out in the Krs culture settlement area indicate that the size of individual sites fell on average between 2 to 3 hectares, although some large settlements (covering as much as 8 to 12 hectares) were also
identified along high embankments. In some cases archival
records indicated extreme extents of 5060 hectares3, such
settlements, however, turned out to have represented multiperiod occupation where precise distinction between phases
was often impossible. At such settlements it is usually a minor component of the find material that could be safely assigned to the Early Neolithic.
Calculations using Thiessen polygons were carried out
to define individual areas around each site. The results show
that on average the occurrence of a new settlement may be
expected every 16 km2 within the territory of Csongrd
County (Map 1). In order to interpret this number, however,
the definition of archaeological sites should be revised,
since more than 60 of the aforementioned 216 sites
yielded only sporadic scatters of early neolithic finds of
fewer than five shards each! Moreover these not only mean
chance finds of pottery collected during field walks, but also
include stray finds atmajor sites, where early neolithic
artefacts of potential diagnostic value could not be associated with features or other stratigraphic phenomena (Krti
1980; Balogh 2007). This problem evidently dilutes the
practical meaning of Thiessen-polygons. Surface finds provide a very poor basis for reconstructing settlement structures.
Archaeological excavations were carried out at 51 of
the 232 known early neolithic settlements. This may be considered a fairly high proportion as it represents almost one
quarter of the entire list. However, field work revealed the
root of another weakness in using Thiessen-polygons in
reconstructing settlement structure in archaeology. This
challenge is posed by the uncertain internal chronology of
the Krs culture, a problem that remains to be solved even
today. It is only the early period characterized by painted
3
4
5
50
Anders A. & Paluch T. 2011. A Krs-kultra fiatalabb idszaknak teleplse Mindszent hatrban Siedlung aus der jngeren Periode der Krs-Kultur in der Gemarkung von
Mindszent. MFMStudia Archaeologica 12, 1529.
Bcsmegi G. 2001. Nagytke, Bels-Ecser, Jaksor, Kajn s Kistke rgszeti topogrfija I. MA dissertation, Jzsef Attila
University, Szeged. Manuscript.
Bcsmegi G. & Fogas O. 2009. A Krs-kultra lelhelyei Nagytkn Sites of the Krs culture at Nagytke. In Bende L. &
Lrinczy G. (eds), Medintl Etig. Tisztelg rsok Csalog
Jzsef szletsnek 100. vforduljn. Szentes 2009, 5559.
Balogh Cs. 2007. Hdmezvsrhely, Batida. Rgszeti Kutatsok
Magyarorszgon 2006 Archaeological Investigations in
Hungary 2006, 212.
Banner J. 1937. A hdmezvsrhelyi reformtus gimnzium rgisggyjtemnye 1. Dolgozatok a Szegedi Tudomnyegyetem
Rgisgtudomnyi Intzetbl 13, 105120.
Bulla B. & Mendl T. 1999. A Krpt-medence fldrajza. Budapest.
Csallny G. 1936. jabb jazig temetk Szentes hatrban
Jazygen Grberfelder bei Szentes. Dolgozatok a Szegedi
Tudomnyegyetem Rgisgtudomnyi Intzetbl 12, 7189.
Glser R. 1991. Bemerkungen zur Absoluten Datierung des
Beginns der Westlichen Linienbandkeramik. Banatica 11,
5364.
Goldman Gy. 1991. A Krs kultra ksi szakasznak idrendjrl Dvavnya-Rhely leletei alapjn Chronology in the
Late phase of the Krs culture on the basis of finds from
Dvavnya-Rhely. Archaeologiai rtest 118, 3344.
Horvth F. 1994. A Dl-alfldi jkkorkutats j szempontjai,
mdszerei s eredmnyei. PhD Thesis. Szeged.
Kalicz N., Molnr S. & Rzss M. 2007. Az lelemtermels
kezdetei Somogy megyben a Kr.e. 76. vezred forduljn.
Az jkkor (neolitikum) legidsebb szakasza Beginnings of
food production in Somogy county at the turn of the 7th-6th
Millennia B. C. The earliest phase of the Neolithic Period.
Communicationes Archaeologicae Hungariae 2007, 1964.
Krti B. 1980. Honfoglals kori magyar temet Szeged-Algyn
Ein ungarisches Grberfeld aus der Landnahmezeit in
Szeged-Algy. Mra Ferenc Mzeum vknyve 197819791,
323345.
Makkay J. 1974. Das Frhe Neolithikum auf der Otzaki Magula
und die KrsStarevo-Kultur. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 26, 131154.
Makkay J. 1982. A magyarorszgi neolitikum kutatsnak j
eredmnyei. Az idrend s a npi azonosts krdsei. Budapest.
Makkay J. 1990. The Protovina problem as seen from the northernmost frontier. In Srejovi D. & Tasi N. (eds), Vina and its
world. International Symposium The Danubian Region from
6000 to 3000 B. C.. Beograd, 113122.
Makkay J. 1992. Excavations at the Krs culture settlement of
Endrd-regszlk 119 in 1986-1989. In Bknyi S. (ed.),
Cultural and landscape changes in south-east Hungary I. reports on the Gyomaendrd Project (= Archaeolingua Main Series 1). Budapest, 121193.
Makkay J. 1996. Theories about the origin, the distribution and the
end of the Krs culture. In Tlas L. (ed.), At the fringes of
three worlds: hunter-gatherers and farmers in the middle
Tisza valley. Szolnok, 3553.
REFERENCES
Ammerman A. J. & Cavalli-Sforza L. L. 1971. Measuring the rate
of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6, 674688.
6
7
8
Deszk-Olajkt (Cs13) 8. gdr, Endrd 119 (B13), Ktelek-Huszrsarok (J) Pit 1, Maroslele-Pana (Cs105) Pit 4, csd-Kirit (Cs105) Pit 2.
In spite of this, evidence of long time sedentism is present in the form of stratified Krs culture settlements such as Hdmezvsrhely-Kopncs,
Tcsy-tanya (Banner 1937) and Pitvaros-Vztroz (Horvth 1994, 5).
Notable examples include Mindszent-Szlpart (1992), Szentes-Boros Smuel utca (2004) and Szentes-Munks utca (2005).
51
52