Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The T.F for each component can then be used to relate one input signal to
another and ultimately derive the closed loop T.F.
Note that the response of closed loop systems to disturbance or set point changes
may be stable or unstable, depending on how the controller is designed or
changes in the dynamics of the process.
No control
t
Undesired growing oscillations
after control
Measured temperature
transmitted as electrical
signal
TT
Control valve
TC
Heater
I/P
Pneumatic signal
Transducer, converts
current to pressure
e
mA
Set point
Converts
0C to mA
Temperature
controller
()
mA
P
mA
Control
valve
Measuring device
()
Disturbance
variable
STH
Controlled
variable
e.g. thermocouple
Measured
temperature
1
2
+
()
+ 1
+ 1
where
1 = 1,
1
2 =
54
()
()
1
+ 1
2
+ 1
Represents change in ()
due to change in
()
+
+
()
Represents summation
of signals
()
()
Represents change in ()
due to change in
115
()
()
+
+
1
+ 1
()
()
()
=
() + 1
Input variable in this case is
the output from the STH, ()
()
()
1
+ 1
116
Measuring element
time constant
()
()
Note that if there is no change in either set point or disturbance variable, then
=
=
() + 1
116
Km in Eqn 116 (called the S.S. gain ) depends on the input and output ranges of the
measuring element as shown in Fig 27.
20
Tm (mA)
12
16
16
= 0.16
100
output range
Span
55
100
T (0C)
Zero = 550C,
Zero and span can be adjusted
for some measuring elements
155
Controller
For a PI controller, the L.T is Eqn 110
()
1
= 1 +
110
111
()
=
112
()
Note that
in Eqn 111 is the output (in mA) from sensor transmitter which is
used internally by the controller.
() is related to the actual set point
() by the sensor transmitter Gain, Km , as
= ()
113
()
()
114
()
()
+
-
1
1 +
()
()
=
()
115
()
()
()
()
Control valve
Pneumatically operated control valve can be air-to-open or air-to-close
2
1
Slope is Kv
Flow
(cfm)
6
9
12
Pressure (psig)
15
The T.F of a valve with a nearly linear relationship between the input and out can
be represented as
()
=
() + 1
()
()
+ 1
116
()
(/)
()
Comparator
Km
mA
mA
()
mA
1
1+
P
mA
KIP
Pt
psi
+ 1
1
+ 1
/
2
+ 1
()
++
()
Km
The notations highlighted above, and which are also used in Fig 32, represent
deviation variables in the s domain
In fig 32, the path from Point E to Y through blocks Gc, Gv and Gp is known as
the forward path.
The path from Y to the comparator through Gm is known as the feedback path.
The feedback loop in Fig 32 has two input signals which are D and Ysp
We want to investigate how Y responds to changes in each of D and Ysp , i.e we
want to generate closed loop T.F for
and
We would make use of the following block diagram algebra to generate the above
stated T.Fs.
U
G1
X1
G2
X2
G3
X3
The three blocks G1, G2 and G3 which are in series can be combined and represented
as one block G
X3
U
G
Fig 33: Equivalent block diagram
The above block combination can be represented using the following algebra
1 = 1
117
2 = 2 1
3 = 3 2
By successive substitution, we have
118
3 = 3 2 1
3 =
where
3 2 1
X3
= +
= 0
No disturbance
121
Note that U in Eqn 121 is related to the other loop variables in the following form
122
123
124
125
126
= =
127
128
129
Rearranging gives
=
1 +
130
Note the order in which the T.Fns are arranged in Eqn 130
120
131
= +
132
Note that =0
Rearranging Eqn 132, we have
=
1 +
133
=
1 +
Note that closed loop T.Fs for set point change and disturbance change both have
the same denominator 1 +
1 +
1 +
134
Solution
Start by reducing the inner loop to get Fig 35.
In order to find
1 1 2 1 2 3
=
1 + 2 1 2 + 1 2 3 1 2 1
()
= =
2 ()
+ 1
()
= =
1 ()
+ 1
=
=
Level transmitter, I/P and control valve all have negligible dynamics, hence the
reason for which they have been represented as
Controller is proportional, hence it is represented as
Process T.F is
( + 1)
Arrange Eqn 135 in the standard form for 1st order systems
The closed loop transfer function for a set point change in Fig 37b is
()
( + 1)
=
()
1 +
( + 1)
135
135a
135b
()
=
() + (1 + )
135c
()
1+
=
()
+1
1 +
()
1
=
() 1 + 1
where
136
137
1 +
138
1 =
1 +
139
1 =
Eqn 136 shows that the closed loop system exhibits a 1st order dynamics with time
constant 1
In Eqn 138, 1 is less than , the process time constant. This shows that the presence
of the controller is meant to give the controlled variable a faster response,
compared with the uncontrolled process.
If we assume that the magnitude of change in set point is M, the closed loop
response to this kind of change is
= 1 1
140
At large values of t, the new steady state value is 1 , which is less than the
desired value of M for values of 1 < 1.
Fig 38 Closed loop response of proportional control to a step change in set point
141
1 =
1 +
We substitute the above values and Eqn 137 into Eqn 141, we have
138
offset = 1 =
142
1+
1
1+
()
=
1 ()
( + 1)
1 +
1
1+
( + 1)
143
Clear denominators in Eqn 143, i.e multiply top and bottom by ( + 1) and
()
=
1 () + 1 + + 1
144a
()
=
1 () 2 + + +
144b
or
Eqn 144b contains a quadratic in the denominator, so we can express Eqn 144b
in the standard form for 2nd order systems
()
=
1 () 2 + + +
145
()
=
2
1
1 ()
+ 1 +
+1
or
()
3
= 2 2
1 () 3 + 233 + 1
3 =
where
3 =
3 =
147
148
149
1 1 +
2
146
150