Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDEX
Click on the content links below to go to the appropriate page and section
JUPITER INTERNET ADVERTISING MODEL
Population Data
Overall Population
Online Population
Online Advertising Market
Spending
Metrics
Distribution by Pricing Scheme
Distribution by Media Format
Offline Advertising Market
Spending
Metrics
METHODOLOGY STATEMENT
Jupiter Internet Advertising Model
[Back to Index]
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Growth
('02-'07)
106.9
284.8
108.1
287.4
109.2
290.0
110.3
292.5
111.5
295.0
112.7
297.5
113.9
300.0
1.1%
0.9%
Online Population
Households
Individuals
62.4
141.3
66.9
156.3
71.5
171.2
76.5
185.3
81.5
198.9
85.7
209.7
88.9
218.6
5.8%
6.9%
Online Penetration
Households
Individuals
58.4%
49.6%
61.9%
54.4%
65.5%
59.0%
69.4%
63.3%
73.1%
67.4%
76.0%
70.5%
78.0%
72.9%
Broadband Population
Households
10.4
15.7
21.4
26.7
32.0
36.8
40.7
Broadband Penetration
US households
Online households
9.7%
16.6%
14.5%
23.4%
19.5%
29.8%
24.2%
34.9%
28.7%
39.2%
32.6%
42.9%
35.8%
45.8%
$4,476
$1,061
$5,537
2.5%
$4,353
$1,242
$5,595
1.0%
$4,760
$1,436
$6,196
10.8%
$5,901
$1,648
$7,548
21.8%
$7,617
$1,884
$9,500
25.9%
$9,468
$2,114
$11,582
21.9%
$11,651
$2,343
$13,994
20.8%
21.8%
13.5%
20.1%
$2.60
-25.2%
$2.04
-21.4%
$1.93
-5.9%
$2.12
10.1%
$2.45
15.7%
$2.79
13.6%
$3.26
17.0%
9.8%
3.1%
3.0%
3.2%
3.7%
4.4%
5.2%
6.1%
Spending Metrics
Online ad spending per online household
Online ad spending per online user
$89
$39
$84
$36
$87
$36
$99
$41
$117
$48
$135
$55
$157
$64
13.5%
12.3%
554
24.0%
610
10.0%
658
7.9%
718
9.1%
779
8.6%
808
3.7%
836
3.5%
6.5%
$1,909
$1,850
$2,017
$2,492
$3,206
$3,971
$4,870
21.4%
21.1%
Clutter
Marketing Impressions per Usage Day
Year-over-year growth
Distribution by Pricing Scheme
Media Spending by Pricing Scheme
Impression-based
[Back to Index]
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Growth
('02-'07)
$1,459
$1,108
$4,476
$1,361
$1,141
$4,353
$1,426
$1,317
$4,760
$1,690
$1,719
$5,901
$2,082
$2,330
$7,617
$2,463
$3,034
$9,468
$2,878
$3,903
$11,651
16.1%
27.9%
21.8%
42.7%
32.6%
24.8%
100.0%
42.5%
31.3%
26.2%
100.0%
42.4%
30.0%
27.7%
100.0%
42.2%
28.6%
29.1%
100.0%
42.1%
27.3%
30.6%
100.0%
41.9%
26.0%
32.0%
100.0%
41.8%
24.7%
33.5%
100.0%
$4,258
$164
$54
$4,476
$4,015
$266
$72
$4,353
$4,254
$377
$130
$4,760
$5,051
$606
$244
$5,901
$6,143
$1,014
$460
$7,617
$7,018
$1,635
$814
$9,468
$7,644
$2,610
$1,397
$11,651
Distribution by Format
Conventional
Rich Media
Streaming
Total
95.1%
3.7%
1.2%
100.0%
92.2%
6.1%
1.7%
100.0%
89.4%
7.9%
2.7%
100.0%
85.6%
10.3%
4.1%
100.0%
80.7%
13.3%
6.0%
100.0%
74.1%
17.3%
8.6%
100.0%
65.6%
22.4%
12.0%
100.0%
$38.9
$15.5
$17.9
$44.3
$11.1
$13.6
$44.7
$39.6
$225.5
-6.4%
$41.2
$15.0
$18.6
$44.8
$11.0
$13.9
$45.9
$40.5
$230.8
2.3%
$43.7
$16.3
$19.7
$46.6
$11.6
$14.6
$47.8
$42.4
$242.7
5.2%
$47.0
$17.6
$21.2
$48.5
$12.3
$15.3
$49.6
$44.9
$256.3
5.6%
$47.8
$18.9
$22.4
$50.4
$13.0
$16.0
$51.4
$46.8
$266.5
4.0%
$48.8
$20.0
$23.6
$52.2
$13.5
$16.7
$53.1
$48.5
$276.3
3.7%
$49.7
$21.0
$24.6
$53.9
$13.9
$17.3
$54.8
$50.2
$285.7
3.4%
3.8%
6.9%
5.8%
3.8%
4.9%
4.6%
3.6%
4.4%
4.4%
$180.8
-7.9%
$184.9
2.3%
$194.9
5.4%
$206.7
6.1%
$215.1
4.1%
$223.1
3.7%
$230.8
3.4%
4.5%
$1,691
$635
$1,711
$643
$1,785
$672
$1,874
$707
$1,929
$729
$1,980
$750
$2,026
$769
3.4%
3.6%
13.7%
57.9%
80.9%
21.8%
Metrics
Spending Metrics
Offline ad spending per household
Offline ad spending per capita
[Back to Index]
COPYRIGHT
ENFORCED
Time online per week. The next lever in calculating online ad inventory is number of hours of Internet
usage.STRICTLY
As users gain
familiarity with the Internet, and as Web ventures offer improved content, the value of the Internet to online consumers increases.
Jupiter expects that average hours of Internet usage per user per week will increase at a nearly six percent compound annual
growth rate through 2007, down from the high, double-digit growth rates experienced in recent years.
Forecast Approach
In developing the forecast, Jupiter split growth expectations into near-term trends and long-term potential. To understand the nearterm trends, Jupiter examined quarterly growth rates in the revenues of online publishers as well as quarterly growth rates in overall
advertising impressions.
To determine the long-term growth potential of online advertising, Jupiter projected the amount of available ad inventoryonline
traffic that flows to sites capable of generating substantial online ad revenueand then applied CPM and sell-through rate
assumptions
to determine
actual revenue
derived
from
these
impressions. Specifically, the following growth Copyright
levers were
used Research
to
JUPITER
INTERNET
ADVERTISING
MODEL,
10/02
(US
Only)
2002 Jupiter
calculate the long-term market size of online advertising:
a division of Jupitermedia Corporation
to Index]
Online population. The first lever in Jupiter's forecast is the size of the online audience. Expected growth in the online[Back
population
provides the most substantial boost to market size, with the online audience increasing from 141 million people at the end of 2001
to nearly 219 million at the end of 2007.
Time online per week. The next lever in calculating online ad inventory is number of hours of Internet usage. As users gain
familiarity with the Internet, and as Web ventures offer improved content, the value of the Internet to online consumers increases.
Jupiter expects that average hours of Internet usage per user per week will increase at a nearly six percent compound annual
growth rate through 2007, down from the high, double-digit growth rates experienced in recent years.
Page views per hour. To calculate total online traffic, Jupiter multiplies the number of online users by time online by an estimate of
page views per hour, based on Media Metrix traffic data.
Total advertising impressions. Using AdRelevance data on advertising impressions served, Jupiter calculated a ratio of ad
impressions per page view and projected this into the future. Jupiter expects this ratio to decrease slightly in coming years as
publishers attempt to reduce clutter by redesigning their interfaces to accommodate fewer, larger ads.
Effective CPM. To translate online ad inventory into actual revenue, Jupiter used the metric of effective CPM. Because most
publishers will only release rate card CPMs rather than actual CPMs earned, effective CPM provides a verifiable industry-wide
measure. Jupiter derives estimates for effective CPM by dividing total online advertising revenue by total impressions served in a
given period. We expect a 10 percent compound annual growth rate in effective CPMs through 2007 based on improvement in the
overall US economy, continuing online media consolidation, reduced clutter, improved ad targeting capabilities, growing ecommerce activity, increased broadband penetration (which allows for additional deployment of premium rich-media advertising),
and growing comfort among traditional advertisers with marketing online.
Clutter Index
To determine the number of commercial impressions an online user sees in an average usage day, Jupiter factored in online
advertising impressions, text links to commercial ventures (e.g., shopping channels), marketing e-mail messages, and page views
on commercial sites (e.g., content, commerce, or corporate). To calculate growth in clutter, Jupiter used its core advertising model
assumptions regarding the growth of online traffic and the total number of online advertising impressions.
Reproduction by any method or unauthorized circulation is strictly prohibited. Jupiter Research data and analysis are intended for the sole use of
clients. All data and projections are based on Jupiter Research's judgment at the time of publication and are subject to change. Copyright 2002
Jupiter Research