Double Cyclone System

CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTIONS
1.1 Objectives

To have a better understanding on the working principle of double cyclone as one of the
air pollution control devices.

To study the effect of cyclone body diameter upon the collection efficiency.

1.2 Literature review

Literally, cyclone or sometimes known as cyclone collectors, cyclone separators, centrifugal
separators, and inertial separators are the pollution control devices that imply a centrifugal
force to separate the dust particles from the gas streams. The operation of this device initially
starts when the gas stream enters at angle and it is started to spin rapidly. Associated with
that, the circular motion that subsequently creates the centrifugal force tends to throw the
dust particles towards the wall of the cyclone. Lastly, after striking the wall, these dust
particles will fall by gravity into a hopper located underneath. In the meantime, the opposing
of these outward particle motions is the inward drag force, which tends to cause the clean
flowing outward for discharging process.
Figure 1.1: Mechanism of cyclone

Double Cyclone System

Besides, cyclones also can be classified into two, which namely as single-cyclone or multicyclone. And when comparing these two technologies, multi-cyclone which consist of
several small cyclones working in parallel mode bring the greatest collection efficiency. This
is due to the fact that multi-cyclone are much longer and smaller in diameter. As the length
increases, it may enhance residence time for the particles to be trapped inside the device.
Even more, longer in size may increase the surface area between the particles and the wall or
surface of the cyclone. Meanwhile, at the smaller diameter, it may increase the centrifugal
force. Therefore, the combination of these two factors may results in higher efficiency of the
particles collection.
Figure 1.2: Example of multi-cyclones

Apart from that, the cyclones also can be categorized into three classes which namely as high
throughput, conventional or high efficiency. The determination of these kinds of cyclones
usually depends on the industrial requirement or the manufacturers interest as well. The
comparison between these devices is as following figure.

Double Cyclone System

Figure 1.3: Efficiency versus particle diameter for different types of cyclones

Along with the above figure, standard cyclone dimensions have been developed in order to
ease the manufacturing of the equipment itself. The standard dimension is as illustrated in the
next following diagram.
Figure 1.4: Standard cyclone dimensions

Double Cyclone System

Alike with any other air pollution control devices, cyclones also equipped with its advantages
and disadvantages. The advantages and disadvantages for this device are presented in the
following table:
Table 1.1: Advantages and disadvantages of cyclone as air pollution device
CYCLONES

Advantages
Low capital cost

No moving parts: lack of maintenance

requirements and low operating cost

Temperature and pressure limitations
only dependent on the materials of

construction
Small space requirements
Dry collection and disposal

Disadvantages
Low collection efficiency especially for
very small particles (< 10m)
High operating cost due to power
required to overcome pressure drop
Unable to handle sticky or tacky
materials

Therefore, in industry, there are two analyses that are required to be performed by the
engineers. The analyses are basically comes in two forms, which namely as
i.

Performance analysis
While conducting an experiment or works related to air pollution control devices, the
main goal of applying these devices are to check the collection efficiency, .
Therefore, prior of calculating the efficiency, the dimension for each of the
parameters should be known and established.

ii.

Design analysis
Design analysis on the manufacturing of cyclone basically needs to consider few
major things such as the (1) target performance, , (2) type of cyclone required
(conventional, high throughput or high efficiency) as well as (3) the characteristics of
the dimensions for both of the particles and type of cyclones selected earlier.
Table 1.2: Influence of varying several characteristics towards the efficiency
4

Double Cyclone System

Cyclone & Process Design Change

Pressure drop

Efficiency

Increase cyclone size (Dc)

Decreases

Decreases

Lengthen cylinder (Lc)

Decreases slightly

Decreases

Increase exit tube diameter (Dc)

Decreases

Increases

Increase inlet area-maintaining velocity

Decreases

Decreases

Increase dust concentration

Decreases for large increases

Decreases

Increase particle size and/ or density

No change

Increases

CHAPTER 2
METHODOLOGY

Double Cyclone System

2.1 Experiment 1: To study the effect of cyclone body diameter upon collection
efficiency
1. The experiment for the big cyclone operation is prepared.
2. The weight of the empty feed container and the dust hopper are being weighted
separately.
3. 50g of the sample should be weighed prior of being slowly poured into the feed container.
4. The air pump is connected to the feed container with the provided tubing and needle
valves should be ensured to be initially closed.
5. The feed container then is attached to the holder and its position is adjusted so that the
outlet of the feed container is just inside the inlet piping of cyclone.
6. The outlet dust filter is cleaned thoroughly.
7. Before conducting the experiment, all of the items and connections are being assembled
and properly tightened.
8. The Main Switch is turned on and at the meantime, the START button is pushed for
running the air blower.
9. The inverter controller is adjusted so that air velocity of 10 m/s may be achieved.
10. The computer is switched on and the EXPERIMENT button is clicked and subsequently,
Experiment 1a is chosen.
11. Then, air pump is switched on and the needle is slowly opened until boiling phenomena
is observed.
12. In the meantime, the stopwatch shall be started.
13. The RECORD button is clicked so that the airflow rates and pressure drops may be
recorded along the experiments.
14. The experiment is conducted for 60 minutes.
15. Once the experiment has been completed, the air blower is switched off.
16. The feed container and the dust hopper are detached from the apparatus and are being
weighted separately later on.
17. The collection efficiency of the cyclone is determined then.
2
Vp p d p
centrifuga l force

drag force
R g
18. After that, the experiment will be repeated by using the small cyclone.
Figure 2.1: Schematic diagram of double cyclone system

Double Cyclone System

CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Pressure drop and collection efficiency are the two major criteria used to evaluate cyclone
performance. Both properties are functions of cyclone dimensions: inlet height (W), inlet width
(H), gas outlet diameter (De ), outlet duct length (S), cyclinder height (Lb), cyclone height (Lc),
and dust outlet diameter (Do).

Time

Experiment 1a (Big cyclone)

Q
V

DPT1
7

Double Cyclone System

(min)
0
10
20
30
40
50

(m3/hr)
132.55
132.39
130.22
132.24
132.19
132.23

(m/s)
35863.10
35792.75
35773.81
35779.22
35765.70
35776.52

(in H2O)
0.51
0.51
0.52
0.52
0.52
0.53

Table 3.1: Final data collection for big cyclone

Time
(min)
0
10
20
30
40
50

Experiment 1b (small cyclone)

Q
V
(m3/hr)
91.83
92.59
92.53
92.17
92.15
92.12

(m/s)
24845.78
25051.41
25035.17
24937.77
24932.36
24924.24

DPT1
(in H2O)
0
0
0
0
0
0

Table 3.2: Final data collection for small cyclone

Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 show the result for flowrate, velocity and pressure difference for big and
small cyclone. As shown in the tables, the bigger cyclone has higher velocity compared to the
smaller cyclone. This phenomenon proves that object with greater speed will have greater force
and as the distance from the center goes further, the greater the force.

Centrifugal force =

mV 2c
r

As propose by above relation, an object traveling in a circle experiences an outward force

(toward the wall) called centrifugal force. This force, known as the centrifugal force, depends on
the mass of the object, the speed of rotation, and the distance from the center. More massive
object will have greater force. Object with greater speed will have greater force and as the
distance from the center goes further, the greater the force.

Double Cyclone System

40000
35000
30000
25000

Velocity (m/s)

20000

15000
Exp 1b-Small
cyclone
10000

Exp 1a-Big cyclone

5000
0
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Time (min)

Figure 3: Velocity difference for Experiment 1(a) and 1(b)

The centrifugal force is created when dust filled air enters the top of the cylindrical collector at
an angle and is spun rapidly downward in a vortex (similar to a whirlpool action). As the air flow
moves in a circular fashion downward, heavier dust particles are thrown against the walls of the
collector, collect, and slide down into the hopper. As exhibited in Figure 3, big cyclone has
higher velocity than small cyclone. Therefore, it will have greater centrifugal force. More dust
will be thrown and collected into the hopper.
Parameter
Data
Experiment
1(a) (big cyclone) 1(b)(small cyclone)
Initial weight of sample in feed container, A
909.40
591.74
Final weight of sample in feed container, B
956.26
627.93
Initial weight of dust hopper, C
804.05
523.63
Final weight of dust hopper, D
813.51
530.19
Weight of sample collected in dust hopper, E
9.46
6.56
Collection efficiency, (%)
20.2
20.0
Table 3.3: Collection efficiency
From both experiment, we can see that the collection efficiency for Experiment 1(a) with large
cyclone is much higher than Experiment 1(b) (See Table 3.3). The collection efficiency is given
by,

Double Cyclone System

2

centrifugal force V p p d p
=
=
drag force
R g

This results obviously violate the theory which increase the cyclone size will decrease the
efficiency. From the literature, longer cyclone in relation to its diameter will provide more vortex
revolutions and thus more chances for particle collection. However, taking into consideration on
the length of the cyclones makes the results became logic. This is due to the fact that the bigger
cyclone has longer body than the smaller one. It has been reported in the literature that a longer
cyclone in relation to its diameter will provide more vortex revolutions and thus more chances
for particle collection. To further support the result, Table 3.4 below indicate the Overall cyclone
collection efficiency(Stern, 1955)

Table 3.4: Overall cyclone collection efficiency (Stern, 1955)

Particles (m)

Conventional Cyclone

<5
5 20
15 20
> 40

<50
50 80
80 95
95 - 99

High efficiency
Cyclone
50 80
80 95
95 - 99
95 - 99

The collection efficiency obtained from this experiment does not reach the overall collection
efficiency which had been published by Stern (1955). Referring Table 3.4, flour is considered 520m in particle size. The conventional cyclone efficiency is around 50 to 80% and for high
efficiency cyclone is 80-95%. The results obtained in this experiment are far from the efficiency
published by Stern (1955). There are few factors that caused this error for example unsteady state
flow rate and low maintenance of the equipment itself. The flour used in this experiment also
needs to be known the exact size so that we can estimate the efficiency of the cyclone correctly.

10

Double Cyclone System

CHAPTER 4
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 Conclusions (ipah)

3.2 Recommendations
In order to obtain the better results for the future work undertakings, some recommendation
steps have been proposed for the implementation. These steps may be explained in detailed in
the following:
i.

The handling of the dust sample should be properly managed so that, any spill over of
the dust into the floor may bring an error while calculating for its actual efficiency.

ii.

The particle size for the dust sample, which is flour in this case, should be uniform
while conducting the experiment. This is due to the reasons that, varying the size of
the particle may results an inaccuracy which is in terms of collection efficiency.

11

Double Cyclone System

CHAPTER 5
REFERENCES
1. EPA Air Pollution Technology Fact Sheet. Retrieved on Oct 5, 2010 from
http://www.p2pays.org/ref/10/09866.pdf.
2. Gaseous Emission - Control Technologies (Air-Quality Technology). Retrieved on Oct 5,
2010 from http://engineering.dartmouth.edu/~cushman/courses/engs37/Cyclones.pdf.
3. The Encyclopedia of Filters - Dust Collection. Retrieved on Oct 5, 2010 from
http://www.qfilter.com/Resource.aspx/DocumentDetail/15.
4. Dust
Collector.
Retrieved
on
Oct
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_collector.
5. Cyclones.
Retrieved
on

Oct

5,
5,

2010
2010

from
from

http://www.ezzesoft.com/files/CYCLONESver2.pdf.
6. Karl B. Schnelle and Charles A. Brown (2002). Chapter 21: Cyclone design, Air
Pollution Control Technology Handbook, CRC Press.
7. Lab manual double cyclone system.

12